Next Article in Journal
Establishment of the Qy Absorption Spectrum of Chlorophyll a Extending to Near-Infrared
Next Article in Special Issue
Biased versus Partial Agonism in the Search for Safer Opioid Analgesics
Previous Article in Journal
A Hidden Coordination-Bond Torsional Deformation as a Sign of Possible Spin Transition in Nickel(II)-Bis(nitroxide) Compounds
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Intriguing Effects of Substituents in the N-Phenethyl Moiety of Norhydromorphone: A Bifunctional Opioid from a Set of “Tail Wags Dog” Experiments
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 17
10.3390/molecules25173792
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of N-Substituents on the Functional Activities of Naltrindole Derivatives for the δ Opioid Receptor: Synthesis and Evaluation of Sulfonamide Derivatives

by
Chiharu Iwamatsu
1,
Daichi Hayakawa
2,
Tomomi Kono
1,
Ayaka Honjo
1,
Saki Ishizaki
1,
Shigeto Hirayama
1,3,
Hiroaki Gouda
2 and
Hideaki Fujii
1,3,*
1
Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Kitasato University, 5-9-1, Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8641, Japan
2
Division of Biophysical Chemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8555, Japan
3
Medicinal Research Laboratories, School of Pharmacy, Kitasato University, 5-9-1, Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8641, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(17), 3792; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173792
Submission received: 31 July 2020 / Revised: 18 August 2020 / Accepted: 19 August 2020 / Published: 20 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Opioids and Their Receptors: Present and Emerging Concepts in Opioid Drug Discovery)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We have recently reported that N-alkyl and N-acyl naltrindole (NTI) derivatives showed activities for the δ opioid receptor (DOR) ranging widely from full inverse agonists to full agonists. We newly designed sulfonamide-type NTI derivatives in order to investigate the effects of the N-substituent on the functional activities because the side chain and S=O part in the sulfonamide moiety located in spatially different positions compared with those in the alkylamine and amide moieties. Among the tested compounds, cyclopropylsulfonamide 9f (SYK-839) was the most potent full inverse agonist for the DOR, whereas phenethylsulfonamide 9e (SYK-901) showed full DOR agonist activity with moderate potency. These NTI derivatives are expected to be useful compounds for investigation of the molecular mechanism inducing these functional activities.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The ligands interacting with receptors have long been classified into agonists and antagonists. However, it is now widely accepted that there are agonists, neutral antagonists, and inverse agonists. Agonists interact with receptors in the active state to induce physiological activities, whereas inverse agonists, which bind to receptors in the inactive state, can suppress the constitutive activities of receptors. The constitutive activity is characterized as activities induced by receptors in the absence of agonists [1,2,3]. Neutral antagonists themselves do not exhibit any activities and can block the functions of both agonists and inverse agonists. Recently, the relationship between some disease states and the constitutive activity of receptors, and developments of inverse agonists have been reported [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. In the opioid field, since Costa and Herz firstly reported that peptidic ICI-174,864 showed δ opioid receptor (DOR) inverse agonist activity [21], several peptidic and non-peptidic DOR inverse agonists have been developed [4]. Possible pharmacological effects resulting from DOR inverse agonism include anorexia [22,23], short-term memory improvement [24], and antitussive effects [25]. We also recently reported several DOR inverse agonists with the skeleton of naltrindole (NTI) [24,25,26], which was developed as a selective DOR antagonist by Portoghese et al. [27,28].
Interestingly, a series of compounds we reported induced activities from full inverse agonists to full agonists depending on their substituents on the 17-nitrogen atom (Figure 1) [24,25,26,29]. Amide-type compound SKY-623 bearing 17-cyclopropanecarbonyl group was a DOR full inverse agonist with high potency [25]. Well-known NTI with the 17-cyclopropylmethyl substituent was a neutral antagonist [27,28]. In contrast, SYK-754 possessing the phenylacetyl group as a 17-substituent was a DOR full agonist with moderate potency [29]. The 17-substituent of the morphinan skeleton, which is a representatively fundamental core of opioid ligands and is shared among NTI and many clinically used opioids like morphine, oxymorphone, and naloxone, is a determinant of the activities of ligands, either agonist or antagonist [30]. Especially, this tendency is observed in the ligands showing selectivity for the μ opioid receptor (MOR), which is one of the known opioid receptor types, encompassing MOR, DOR, and κ opioid receptor (KOR). For example, naltrexone and naloxone with a bulky 17-substituent like cyclopropylmethyl and allyl, respectively, are antagonists, while morphine and oxymorphone, having a small methyl group at the 17-nitrogen, are agonists. However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of opioid ligands with common structures, but possessing different 17-substituents, whose activities range from full inverse agonists to full agonists. It is also worth noting that amide-type compounds SYK-623 and SYK-754 showed opioid functionality even though they lack a basic nitrogen. The basic nitrogen in opioid ligands, which is protonated under the physiological environment, is well-known to be an essential pharmacophore. Indeed, co-crystals of opioid receptors with specific antagonists or agonists have been resolved to reveal the interaction between the protonated nitrogen atom in the ligands and the aspartic acid residue in the receptor [31,32,33,34,35]. Moreover, such interaction between a ligand and the receptor has also been recently elucidated by cryo-electron microscopic analysis of the ligand-receptor complex [36,37]. The neoclerodane diterpene salvinolin A is known to be a non-nitrogenous KOR agonist [38]. However, salvinolin A has been reported to bind to the KOR in a different fashion from that of morphinan derivatives [39]. Taken together, several NTI derivatives that we have reported (Figure 1) are expected to be useful compounds to elucidate the binding modes of these structures and to investigate the effects of the N-substituents on the conformational changes of the DOR that induce functional activities from inverse agonists to agonists. We were therefore interested in sulfonamide-type NTI derivatives, because not only the orientation of the sidechain, but also the chemical property of the nitrogen atom in the sulfonamide moiety differs from those of tertiary alkyl or amide-type compounds. Herein, we will report the synthesis of sulfonamide-type NTI derivatives and the evaluation of their opioid activities. We also compared activities among the NTI derivatives having corresponding tertiary alkyl amine, amide, and sulfonamide moieties.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. The Most Stable Conformations of the Corresponding Alkyl-, Amide-, and Sulfonamide-Type Compounds and the Comparison of the Basicities of Their Nitrogen Atoms

In order to clarify the structural differences among alkylamines, amides, and sulfonamides, we calculated the most stable conformations of 1-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)piperidine (A), 1-(trifluoroacetyl)piperidine (B), and 1-(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)piperidine (C) as model compounds at the ωB97XD/6-31G(d,p) level (Figure 2). The orientations of trifluoromethyl parts in the three model compounds differed from each other. The C=O or S=O moieties in piperidines B or C, which were possible functionalities to interact with the receptor, were also oriented toward distinct directions. The active conformers, which interact with the target proteins, do not necessarily correspond to the most stable conformations. However, it is obvious that the relative relationship among the spatial locations of the piperidine ring, side chain, and the C=O or S=O moieties varied among the three piperidines. As the nitrogens of piperidines A and B are sp3 and sp2 hybridized, respectively, the structures of these nitrogens were trigonal pyramid and the trigonal plannar, respectively. Meanwhile, the nitrogen of piperidine C was observed to be slightly pyramidalized. According to the calculations by Advanced Chemistry Development (ACD/Labs) Software V11.02, the nitrogen of piperidine A is basic, whereas piperidines B and C have no basic nitrogens: the predicted pKa values were 6.79 ± 0.10 for A, −1 ± 0.20 for B, and −7.81 ± 0.20 for C. The amide-type NTI derivative SYK-623 (Figure 1) was a DOR full inverse agonist, even though it lacked a basic nitrogen, a known important pharmacophore. This observation evoked the idea that the C=O moiety might compensate for the interaction between the protonated nitrogen and the receptor. It is interesting to consider whether the S=O moieties in sulfonamide-type NTI derivatives, which were oriented differently from the C=O part in amide-type NTI derivatives, can function as a surrogate for the amide carbonyl moiety.

2.2. Chemical Synthesis

Compound 7 [24,25], which is the key intermediate for the synthesis of the target sulfonamide-type NTI derivatives, was synthesized from naltrexone hydrochloride (1) (Scheme 1). Fischer indolization of 1 with phenylhydrazine hydrochloride gave NTI (2) [27,28] in 99% yield, which was treated with acetic anhydride to afford diacetate 3 in 95% yield. The reaction of 3 with Troc-Cl provided a mixture of compounds 4 and 4′. Although the dealkylation with chloroformates is the usual method [40,41,42], the application of the methodology to 14-hydroxymorphinan derivatives requires the protection of the 14-hydroxy group because the cleavage reaction of the D-ring (piperidine ring) reportedly proceeded when applying the methodology to 14-hydroxy free morphinan derivatives [43]. Although the treatment with zinc and acetic acid is the usual deprotection procedure for the N-Troc group [44], the application of the deprotection conditions to the 14-acetoxy morphinan derivatives like 4 and 4′ sometimes facilitated the migration of the acetyl group from the 14-O-position to the 17-nitrogen. Therefore, we attempted to hydrolyze the 14-acetate under basic conditions using methanol as a solvent to afford compounds 5 and 6 in 60% and 21% yields, respectively. As compound 5 was unexpectedly obtained, we explored the optimal conditions of hydrolysis (see the Supporting Information for details). The treatment of a mixture of 4 and 4′ with 4 M NaOH aqueous solution using THF as a solvent selectively furnished compound 5 and methyl carbamate 6 was almost not detected. Finally, the key intermediate 7 was prepared by introduction of TBS group at the phenolic hydroxy group of 5. Although we previously reported the synthesis of 7 from 1 [24], the synthetic method shown in Scheme 1 was four steps shorter and provided the key intermediate 7 in higher total yield than the previous method (see the Supporting Information for details). Portoghese et al. and Rice et al. independently reported the synthesis of the 5 hydrochloride from noroxymorphone in one step (see the Supporting Information for details) [45,46]. However, noroxymorphone is difficult to obtain and very expensive compared with naltrexone hydrochloride (1).
Designed sulfonamide-type NTI derivatives 9 were synthesized from the key intermediate 7 (Scheme 2). Sulfonylation of 7 and the followed deprotection of TBS group gave compounds 9a–g. For the synthesis of vinyl sulfonamide derivatives 8g, 2-chloroethylsulfonyl chloride was used in the presence of NaOH instead of triethylamine. The change from triethylamine to more basic NaOH effectively expedited E2 elimination to provide the vinylsulfonyl moiety.

2.3. Binding Affinity and Functional Activity

The binding affinities of the synthesized compounds 9 for the opiod receptors were evaluated by competitive binding assays according to the previously reported methods [47] (Table 1). Although the binding affinity of compound 9d for the DOR was low, the other tested compounds 9 bound to the DOR with strong to moderate affinities. Among them, compound 9f with a cyclopropylsulfonyl group was the strongest binder to the DOR with a Ki value of 7.44 nM. However, its affinity for the DOR was over 10-fold lower than that of the mother compound NTI. Compounds 9c and 9f, which had relatively high affinities for the DOR, showed binding affinities for the KOR, but their affinities for the KOR were lower than those for the DOR. All the tested compounds exhibited almost no affinities for the MOR. The DOR selectivities displayed by the tested compounds tended to also be observed in the series of alkyl- and amide-type NTI derivatives.
As all the tested compounds 9 showed DOR selectivities, we evaluated the functional activities of 9 for the DOR by [35S]GTPγS binding assays according to the previously reported methods [47] (Table 1). Compounds 9a, 9b, 9f, and 9g showed inverse agonist activities. Among them, compounds 9f and 9g showing high efficacies were almost full inverse agonists. The activity of 9f was comparable to that to SYK-623 (EC50 = 0.969 nM, Emax = −91.2%) [25]. Interestingly, both compounds possessing the cyclopropyl moiety together with either a C=O or a S=O functionality were inverse agonists, while the NTI-bearing cyclopropylmethyl group, with neither the C=O nor S=O moiety, was a neutral antagonist. Benzylsulfonamide 9d and phenethylsulfonamide 9e were DOR agonists. Morphine derivatives with large and small N-substituents are known to show antagonist and agonist activities, respectively, while the N-phenethyl derivative bearing a larger N-substituent was an agonist [30]. Although it is not fully clear why such outcomes were observed, the observations for compounds 9d and 9e may result from a similar cause. As no [35S]GTPγS binding was measured for compound 9c, 9c was a neutral DOR antagonist.
We summarized the binding affinities and functional acitvities of the corresponding alkyl-, amide-, and sulfonamide-type NTI derivatives for the DOR in Table 2. Full agonists, partial agonists, neutral antagonists, partial inverse agonists, and full inverse agonists were categorized based on the following criteria: Emax ≥ 80% for full agonists, 80% > Emax ≥ 10% for partial agonists, 10% > Emax > −10% for neutral antagonists, −10% ≥ Emax > −80% for partial inverse agonists, and −80% ≥ Emax for full inverse agonists. In the case that the substituent R was methyl, trifluoromethyl, phenyl, or cyclopropyl group, NTI derivatives were neutral antagonsts or inverse agonists. However, no clear trend dependent on the moiety X was observed. On the other hand, the derivatives bearing benzyl or phenethyl substituent as the R group exhibited agonist activities regardless of the moiety X. Although all the derivatives with the phenyl, benzyl, or phenethyl substituent as the R group possessed the phenyl ring in their N-substituents, regardless of the moiety X, the derivatives with benzyl-X- or phenethyl-X- group showed positive intrinsic activities whereas N-(phenyl-X)- derivatives displayed no positive intrinsic activities. It is not clear why such results were obtained, but the length between the phenyl ring and morphinan core structure may play a key role. When the substituent R is a vinyl group, the X moiety seemed to control the functional activities: an alkyl-type derivative (X = CH2) was an agonist while amide-type (X = CO) or sulfonamide-type (X = SO2) derivatives were inverse agonists. The outcomes shown in Table 2 critically suggest that the N-substituent (R-X- group) would affect the functional activity. This observation is consistent with the idea that binding of these different structures would selectively alter the conformation of the DOR to induce an agonistic, inverse agonistic activity, or no activity at all. However, it is not yet known which functional group or which interaction would control the conformational changes of the receptor based on the classical structure-activity relationship study carried out in this research. Further investigations using computational simulation, X-ray crystallographic or cryo-electron microscopic studies of the complex of these ligands with the DOR are expected to reveal key insights.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Information

All reagents and solvents were obtained from commercial suppliers and were used without further purification. Melting points were determined on a Yanako MP-500P melting point apparatus and were uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded on a JASCO FT/IR-460Plus. NMR spectra were recorded on an Agilent Technologies VXR-400NMR for 1H- and 13C-NMR. Chemical shifts were reported as δ values (ppm) referenced to tetramethylsilane, acetone-d6, methanol-d4, or dimethyl sulfoxide-d6. MS were obtained on a JMS-AX505HA, JMS-700 MStation, or JMS-100LP instrument by applying an electrospray ionization (ESI) method. Elemental analyses were determined with a Yanako MT-5 and JM10 for carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen. The progress of the reaction was determined on Merck Silica Gel Art. 5715 (TLC) visualized by exposure to UV light or with sodium phosphomolybdate solution (sodium phosphomolybdate (9.68 g) in distillated water (400 mL), sulfuric acid (20 mL), and 85% phosphoric acid (6 mL)). Column chromatographies were carried out using Fuji Silysia CHROMATOREX® PSQ 60B (60 μm) or Fuji Silysia CHROMATOREX® NH-DM2035 (60 μm). The reactions were performed under an argon atmosphere unless otherwise noted.

3.2. Procedures for the Synthesis All the New Compounds and Their Spectroscopic Data

3.2.1. 17-Cyclopropyl-6,7-didehydro-4,5α-epoxyindolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-3,14β-diyl Diacetate (3)

A solution of NTI (220 mg, 0.53 mmol) in acetic anhydride (5 mL) was stirred at 83 °C for 2 h. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was poured into saturated sodium bicarbonate aqueous solution and extracted with chloroform. The combined organic layers were washed with brine and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. After removing the solvent in vacuo, the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the title compound 3 (252 mg, 95%) as a yellow amorphous material; IR (film) cm−1: 3375, 1730, 1450, 1367, 1255, 1231, 1190, 1155, 1046, 1016, 744. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.05–0.17 (m, 2H), 0.46–0.57 (m, 2H), 0.77–0.88 (m, 1H), 1.78 (dd, J = 2.0, 12.2 Hz, 1H), 1.96 (s, 3H), 2.24 (s, 3 H), 2.25–2.32 (m, 1H), 2.28 (dd, J = 6.9, 12.5 Hz, 1H), 2.42 (dd, J = 6.1, 12.5 Hz, 1H), 2.53 (ddd, J = 5.3, 12.3, 12.3 Hz, 1H), 2.55 (dd, J = 1.3, 16.9 Hz, 1H), 2.72-2.80 (m, 2H), 3.18 (d, J = 18.8 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (d, J = 16.9 Hz, 1H), 4.70 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 5.69 (s, 1H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.03−7.08 (m, 1H), 7.15–7.21 (m, 1H), 7.34 (br d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (br d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.7, 3.8, 9.5, 20.5, 22.3, 24.0, 24.5, 30.9, 43.7, 48.2, 55.7, 59.5, 83.8, 85.7, 110.9, 111.3, 118.7, 119.1, 119.4, 122.4, 122.9, 126.6, 128.6, 130.8, 132.0, 132.8, 137.0, 146.9, 168.5, 170.6. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C30H31N2O5 [M + H]+: 499.2233. Found: 499.2246.

3.2.2. 6,7-Didehydro-4,5α-epoxyindolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-3,14β-diol (nor-NTI) (5)

To a solution of compound 3 (1.6 g, 3.22 mmol) in 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (10 mL) were added potassium carbonate (2.2 g, 16.1 mmol) and 2,2,2-trichloroethyl chloroformate (2.22 mL, 16.1 mmol), and the mixture was refluxed for 20 h with stirring. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was poured into saturated sodium bicarbonate aqueous solution and extracted with chloroform. The combined organic layers were washed with brine and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. After removing the solvent in vacuo, the obtained crude product was used in the next reaction without any purification.
To a solution of the crude product in THF (15 mL) was added 4 M sodium hydroxide aqueous solution and the mixture was refluxed for 24 h with stirring. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was poured into saturated sodium bicarbonate aqueous solution and adjusted to pH 7–8 by addition of 2 M hydrochloric acid, then extracted with a mixed solvent (chloroform:ethanol = 3:1). The combined organic layers were washed with brine and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. After removing the solvent in vacuo, the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the title compound 5 (834 mg, 72% from 3) as a yellow amorphous material; IR (film) cm−1: 3292, 1617, 1501, 1457, 1325, 1240, 1164, 1072, 868. 1H NMR (400 MHz, methanol-d4): δ 1.90 (dd, J = 3.8, 13.2 Hz, 1H), 2.65 (dd, J = 1.2, 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.66 (ddd, J = 5.2, 13.4, 13.4 Hz, 1H), 2.92 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.99 (ddd, J = 4.1, 13.2, 13.2 Hz, 1H), 3.12−3.18 (m, 1H), 3.21 (d, J = 19.2 Hz, 1H), 3.46 (dd, J = 6.8, 19.2 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 5.68 (s, 1H), 6.639 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.648 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (ddd, J = 0.9, 7.1, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (ddd, J = 1.1, 7.1, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (s, 1H), three protons (OH × 2 and NH) were not observed. 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 47.1, 54.3, 56.1, 67.0, 71.7, 72.1, 79.2, 84.3, 109.6, 111.4, 114.6, 118.3, 118.5, 121.8, 125.0, 126.3, 129.4, 130.2, 136.8, 141.9, 143.9, 170.6. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C22H21N2O3 [M + H]+: 361.1552. Found: 361.1563.

3.2.3. Methyl 6,7-Didehydro-4,5α-epoxy-3,14β-dihydorxyindolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-17-ylcarboxylate (6)

The hydrolysis of the crude compound, which was obtained by the reaction of compound 3 with 2,2,2-trichloroethyl chloroformate, was carried out using methanol instead of THF as a solvent, provided compound 5 (60%) and the title compound 6 (21%) as off-white amorphous material; IR (film) cm−1: 3400, 1673, 1454, 1325, 909, 735. 1H NMR (400 MHz, methanol-d4): δ 1.58-1.68 (m, 1H), 2.39–2.50 (m, 1H), 2.60 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 0.5H), 2.62 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 0.5H), 2.82-2.99 (m, 3H), 3.32 (d, J = 18.2 Hz, 0.5H), 3.33 (d, J = 18.2 Hz, 0.5H), 3.71 (s, 1.5H), 3.73 (s, 1.5H), 4.00 (dd, J = 5.0, 13.7 Hz, 0.5H), 4.06 (dd, J = 5.0, 13.7 Hz, 0.5H), 4.59 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 0.5H), 4.65 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 0.5H), 5.59 (s, 1H), 6.54 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.59 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (ddd, J = 0.9, 7.1, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (ddd, J = 1.0, 7.1, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (s, 1H), two protons (OH × 2) were not observed. 13C NMR (100 MHz, methanol-d4): δ 30.2, 30.4, 33.6, 38.2, 38.5, 48.8, 53.3, 58.0, 58.3, 74.4, 79.5, 85.99, 86.03, 110.8, 110.9, 112.2, 118.7, 119.4, 119.5, 119.8, 120.1, 123.3, 125.3, 128.1, 130.6, 130.7, 131.6, 138.8, 141.3, 144.9, 158.6. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C24H22N2NaO5 [M + Na]+: 441.1426. Found: 441.1412.

3.2.4. General Synthesis of Sulfonamides 8

To a solution of compound 7 in dichloromethane were added sulfonyl chloride (RSO2Cl) or trifluoromethylsulfonyl anhydride (2–4 eq) and triethylamine (2–4 eq), and the mixture was stirred at 0 °C. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC analysis. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was poured into saturated sodium bicarbonate aqueous solution and extracted with chloroform. The combined organic layers were washed with brine and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. After removing the solvent in vacuo, the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography.

3-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-6,7-didehydro-4,5α-epoxy-17-(methylsulfonyl)indolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-14β-ol (8a)

Yield: 78%, white oil, IR (neat) cm-1: 3583, 2927, 1497, 1443, 1323, 1274, 1147, 1044, 955, 906, 842. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.02 (s, 3H), 0.04 (s, 3H), 0.89 (s, 9H), 1.82 (dd, J = 2.2, 12.8 Hz, 1H), 2.50 (ddd, J = 5.4, 12.8, 12.8 Hz, 1H), 2.69 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 2.91 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (s, 3H), 3.15 (ddd, J = 3.5, 13.3, 13.3 Hz, 1H), 3.17 (d, J = 18.8 Hz, 1H), 3.39 (dd, J = 6.6, 18.8 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (dd, J = 5.3, 13.7 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (s, 1H), 6.56 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (ddd, J = 0.9, 7.1, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (ddd, J = 1.1, 7.1, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (br d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (br d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.11 (s, 1H), a proton (OH) was not observed. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ −4.8, −4.7, 18.2, 25.5, 29.7, 29.8, 33.9 , 38.9, 45.9, 47.9, 58.4, 73.3, 83.7, 109.7, 111.3, 118.8, 119.3, 119.8, 122.6, 123.4, 125.1, 126.5, 128.8, 129.3, 137.1, 138.9, 146.6. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C29H36N2NaO5SSi [M + Na]+: 575.2012. Found: 575.2029.

3-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-6,7-didehydro-4,5α-epoxy-17-(1,1,1-trifluoromethylsulfonyl)indolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-14β-ol (8b)

Yield: 74%, white amorphous material, IR (film) cm−1: 3417, 2930, 2857, 1605, 1498, 1382, 1195, 1115, 1044, 842. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.02 (s, 3H), 0.04 (s,3H), 0.88 (s, 9H), 1.75 (br d, J = 12.8 Hz, 1H), 2.53–2.81 (m, 3 H), 3.09 (d, J = 18.9 Hz, 1H), 3.24 (ddd, J = 2.9, 13.5, 13.5 Hz, 1H), 3.40 (dd, J = 6.6, 18.9 Hz, 1H), 3.86 (dd, J = 4.6, 13.9 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.57 (s, 1H), 6.57 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.63 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.05–7.10 (m, 1H), 7.20 (ddd, J = 1.1, 7.1, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (dd, J = 0.7, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (br d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.15 (s, 1H), a proton (OH) was not observed. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ −4.8, −4.7, 18.2, 25.5, 29.68, 29.71, 29.9, 40.5, 47.5, 60.0, 72.4, 83.6, 109.7, 111.3, 118.8, 119.2, 119.8, 122.8, 123.3, 124.0, 126.4, 128.6, 129.3, 137.1, 139.2, 146.6, the carbon binding to fluorines was not determined. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C29H34F3N2O5SSi [M + H]+: 607.1910. Found: 607.1898.

3-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-6,7-didehydro-4,5α-epoxy-17-(phenylsulfonyl)indolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-14β-ol (8c)

Yield: 90%, white oil, IR (neat) cm−1: 3399, 3059, 3023, 2928, 2857, 1714, 1631, 1604, 1496, 1455. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ −0.02 (s, 3H), 0.01 (s, 3H), 0.87 (s, 9H), 1.82 (dd, J = 1.0, 13.0 Hz, 1H), 2.45 (ddd, J = 5.4, 12.8, 12.8 Hz, 1H), 2.606 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 2.609 (d, J = 18.8 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (s, 1H), 2.922 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 2.924 (ddd, J = 3.6, 12.6, 12.6 Hz, 1H), 3.10 (dd, J = 6.6, 18.8 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (dd, J = 5.2, 12.7 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (s, 1H), 6.36 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.52 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (ddd, J = 0.9, 7.0, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (ddd, J = 1.1, 7.0, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (br d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.39(br d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.53–7.60 (m, 2H), 7.61–7.66 (m, 1H), 7.87–7.92 (m, 2H), 8.06 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ −4.8, −4.7, 18.2, 25.5, 29.1, 30.1, 30.5, 38.7, 47.7, 58.7, 72.8, 84.1, 110.7, 111.1, 118.9, 119.5, 122.4, 123.1, 124.7, 126.5, 127.2, 128.4, 129.4, 129.8, 132.9, 137.1, 138.9, 139.8, 146.5, two signals in the aromatic region would be overlapped. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C34H39N2O5SSi [M + H]+: 615.2349. Found: 615.2359.

17-(Benzylsulfonyl)-3-((tert-butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-6,7-didehydro-4,5α-epoxyindolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-14β-ol (8d)

Yield: 98%, white amorphous material, IR (film) cm−1: 3397, 3061, 2953, 2928, 2856, 1497, 1324, 1274, 1043, 852. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.00 (s, 3H), 0.02 (s, 3H), 0.88 (s, 9H), 1.68 (dd, J = 2.0, 12.9 Hz, 1H), 2.33 (ddd, J = 5.4, 12.9, 12.9 Hz, 1H), 2.61 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 2.84 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 2.94 (d, J = 19.0 Hz, 1H), 3.02 (ddd, J = 3.5, 13.2, 13.2 Hz, 1H), 3.24 (dd, J = 6.6, 19.0 Hz, 1H), 3.38 (dd, J = 5.3, 13.6 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 5.54 (s, 1H), 6.49 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.57 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (ddd, J = 0.9, 7.1, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (ddd, J = 1.0, 7.1, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.50 (m, 5H), 8.07 (s,1H), a proton (OH) was not observed. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ −4.8, −4.7, 18.2, 25.5, 29.5, 29.6, 33.2, 39.5, 47.7, 58.7, 58.9, 73.0, 83.9, 110.4, 111.2, 118.8, 119.0, 119.6, 122.4, 123.1, 125.1, 126.6, 128.6, 128.8, 128.9, 129.4, 129.7, 130.6, 137.1, 138.8, 146.4. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C35H41N2O5SSi [M + H]+: 629.2505. Found: 629.2492.

3-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-6,7-didehydro-4,5α-epoxy-17-((2-phenyethyl)sulfonyl)indolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-14β-ol (8e)

Yield: 46%, pale yellow oil, IR (neat) cm−1: 2928, 1497, 1443, 1275, 1147, 1044, 907, 853, 741, 423. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.01 (s, 3H), 0.04 (s, 3H), 0.88 (s, 9H), 1.78 (br d, J = 12.7 Hz, 1H), 2.47 (ddd, J = 5.3, 12.7, 12.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.68 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 2.87 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.11-3.23 (m , 4H), 3.32-3.43 (m, 3 H), 3.75 (dd, J = 5.1, 13.6 Hz, 1H), 4.33 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 5.55 (s, 1H), 6.54 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.60 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.04–7.09 (m, 1H), 7.16-7.35 (m, 7H), 7.40 (br d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.13 (br s, 1H), a proton (OH) was not observed. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ −4.8, −4.7, 18.2, 25.5, 28.4, 29.7, 29.8, 33.6, 38.9, 47.9, 54.4, 58.4, 73.1, 83.9, 110.1, 111.2, 118.8, 119.1, 119.7, 122.5, 123.2, 125.1, 126.6, 126.8, 128.4, 128.7, 128.8, 129.6, 137.1, 138.2, 138.8, 146.5. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C36H42N2NaO5SSi [M + Na]+: 665.2481. Found: 665.2468.

3-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-17-(cyclopropylsulfonyl)-6,7-didehydro-4,5α-epoxyindolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-14β-ol (8f)

Yield: 98%, white amorphous material, IR (film) cm−1: 3397, 2928, 1604, 1497, 1444, 1325, 1274, 1147, 1046, 937, 906, 852. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.01 (s, 3H), 0.04 (s, 3H), 0.89 (s, 9H), 1.00–1.10 (m, 2H), 1.20–1.28 (m, 2H), 1.83 (br d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H), 2.44–2.55 (m, 2H), 2.67 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 2.83 (s, 1H), 2.93 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.13 (ddd, J = 3.4, 12.9, 12.9 Hz, 1H), 3.32 (d, J = 18.7 Hz, 1H), 3.37 (dd, J = 6.2, 18.7 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (dd, J = 5.0, 13.0 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 5.60 (s, 1H), 6.55 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.60 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (br dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (br dd, J = 7.6, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ −4.8, −4.7, 5.3, 5.7, 18.2, 25.5, 29.2, 29.7, 30.0, 32.4, 38.9, 47.7, 58.8, 72.8, 84.1, 110.5, 111.2, 118.8, 118.9, 119.5, 122.4, 123.0, 124.9, 126.5, 128.6, 129.9, 137.1, 138.9, 146.5. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C31H39N2O5SSi [M + H]+: 579.2349. Found: 579.2367.

3.2.5. 3-((tert-Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)-6,7-didehydro-4,5α-epoxy-17-(ethenylsulfonyl)indolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-14β-ol (8g)

To a solution of compound 7 (29.9 mg, 0.063 mmol) in dichloromethane (3 mL) were added 2-chloroethanesulfonyl chloride (22.0 μL, 0.20 mmol) and 0.5 M sodium hydroxide aqueous solution (15 μL), and the mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 20 h. The reaction mixture was poured into saturated sodium bicarbonate aqueous solution and extracted with chloroform. The combined organic layers were washed with brine and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. After removing the solvent in vacuo, the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the title compound 8f (19.8 mg, 56%) as a white amorphous material; IR (film) cm−1: 3397, 2928, 2857, 1497, 1444, 1325, 1148, 1043, 852, 744. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.01 (s, 3H), 0.04 (s, 3H), 0.88 (s, 9H), 1.80 (dd, J = 2.1, 13.0 Hz, 1H), 2.46 (ddd, J = 5.4, 12.8, 12.8 Hz, 1H), 2.67 (dd, J = 0.9, 15.9 Hz, 1H), 2.91 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (ddd, J = 3.5, 13.1, 13.1 Hz, 1H), 3.17 (d, J = 18.8 Hz, 1H), 3.34 (dd, J = 6.5, 18.8 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (dd, J = 5.3, 13.3 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (s, 1H), 5.99 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 6.31 (d, J = 16.6 Hz, 1H), 6.54 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.60 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (dd, J = 10.0, 16.6 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (ddd, J = 0.8, 7.0, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (ddd, J = 1.1, 7.0, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (br d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (br d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (s, 1H), a proton (OH) was not observed. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ −4.8, −4.7, 18.2, 25.5, 29.4, 29.6, 32.6, 38.3, 47.8, 58.4, 72.9, 84.0, 110.4, 111.2, 118.9, 119.1, 119.6, 122.5, 123.2, 124.9, 126.6, 127.1, 128.6, 129.7, 135.7, 137.1, 138.9, 146.5. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C30H37N2O5SSi [M + H]+: 565.2192. Found: 565.2195.

3.2.6. General Synthesis of Test Compounds 9

To a solution of compound 8 in THF was added 1.0 M solution of tetrabutylammonium fluoride in THF (excess), and the mixture was stirred at room temperature. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC analysis. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was poured into saturated sodium bicarbonate aqueous solution and extracted with a mixed solvent (chloroform: ethanol = 3:1). The combined organic layers were washed with brine and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. After removing the solvent in vacuo, the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography.

6,7-Didehydro-4,5α-epoxy-17-(methylsulfonyl)indolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-3,14β-diol (9a)

Yield: 87%, white amorphous material, IR (film) cm−1: 3855, 3823, 3364, 1691, 1314, 1149, 899, 803, 752, 467. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.80 (dd, J = 2.2, 12.9 Hz, 1H), 2.49 (ddd, J = 5.4, 12.8, 12.8 Hz, 1H), 2.61 (dd, J = 0.9, 15.9 Hz, 1H), 2.67 (s, 1H), 2.91 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 3.22 (s, 3H), 3.14 (ddd, J = 3.5, 13.3, 13.3 Hz, 1H), 3.16 (d, J = 18.7 Hz, 1H), 3.36 (dd, J = 6.5, 18.7 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (dd, J = 5.3, 13.6 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.02 (br s, 1H), 5.61 (s, 1H ), 6.58 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (ddd, J = 0.9, 7.0, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (ddd, J = 1.1, 7.0, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.29 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 29.5, 30.9, 32.9, 38.6, 40.0, 48.0, 58.4, 73.2, 85.0, 110.5, 111.4, 117.8, 118.9, 119.6, 119.8, 123.4, 124.1, 126.5, 128.4, 129.2, 137.1, 139.3, 143.0. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C23H23N2O5S [M + H]+: 439.1328. Found: 439.1336. Anal. Calcd for C23H22N2O5S·1.1EtOH: C, 61.87; H, 5.89; N, 5.73. Found C, 61.47; H, 5.53; N, 5.36.

6,7-Didehydro-4,5α-epoxy-17-(1,1,1-trifluoromethylsulfonyl)indolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-3,14β-diol (9b)

Yield: 74%, white amorphous material, IR (film) cm−1: 3410, 2924, 1707, 1638, 1618, 1508, 1456, 1380, 1195, 1113. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.77 (br d, J = 12.6 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (ddd, J = 5.3, 12.8, 12.8 Hz, 1H), 2.65 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 3.16 (d, J = 18.9 Hz, 1H), 3.25 (ddd, J = 2.8, 13.3, 13.3 Hz, 1H), 3.44 (dd, J = 6.7, 18.9 Hz, 1H), 3.88 (dd, J = 4.9, 13.8 Hz, 1H), 4.38 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (br s, 1H), 5.65 (s, 1H), 6.61 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.68 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (dd, J = 7.4, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.13-7.28 (m, 1H), 7.32 (br d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (br d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.25 (s, 1H), a proton (OH) was not observed. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 29.7, 37.7, 40.5, 47.6, 59.9, 72.6, 85.0, 110.0, 111.5, 118.1, 118.9, 119.8, 119.9, 121.5, 123.5, 126.3, 128.1, 128.8, 137.1, 139.4, 142.9, a carbon in an aliphatic region was not observed, and the carbon binding to fluoride was not determined. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C23H20F3N2O5S [M + H]+: 493.1045. Found: 493.1058. Anal. Calcd for C23H19F3N2O5S·MeOH: C, 54.85; H, 4.60; N, 5.33. Found C, 54.90; H, 4.73; N, 5.12.

6,7-Didehydro-4,5α-epoxy-17-(phenylsulfonyl)indolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-3,14β-diol (9c)

Yield: 84%, white amorphous material, IR (film) cm−1: 3395, 2961, 2874, 1719, 1638, 1457, 1323, 1273, 1159, 730. 1H NMR (400 MHz, aceton-d6): δ 1.69-1.76 (m, 1H), 2.59 (ddd, J = 5.4, 12.7, 12.7 Hz, 1H), 2.62 (dd, J = 1.0, 15.9 Hz, 1H), 2.67 (d, J = 18.6 Hz, 1H), 2.92 (ddd, J = 3.5, 12.8, 12.8 Hz, 1H), 2.94 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 3.21 (dd, J = 6.4, 18.6 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (dd, J = 5.2, 12.8 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (s, 1H), 4.47 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 5.59 (s, 1H), 6.39 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.56 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (ddd, J = 0.9, 7.1, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (ddd, J = 1.1, 7.1, 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.39 (m, 2H), 7.59–7.67 (m, 3H), 7.84 (br s, 1H), 7.93-7.99 (m, 2H), 10.2 (br s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 28.8, 29.0, 31.3, 38.5, 47.0, 58.2, 71.8, 71.9, 83.8, 109.5, 111.4, 117.3, 118.38, 118.44, 121.9, 123.1, 126.4, 126.9, 129.3, 129.5, 130.0, 132.6, 136.8, 140.3, 140.5, 143.2, two signals in the aromatic region would be overlapped. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C28H25N2O5S [M + H]+: 501.1484. Found: 501.1474. Anal. Calcd for C28H24N2O5S·H2O: C, 64.85; H, 5.05; N, 5.40. Found C, 64.92; H, 4.83; N, 5.31.

17-(Benzylsulfonyl)-6,7-didehydro-4,5α-epoxyindolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-3,14β-diol (9d)

Yield: 84%, white amorphous material, IR (film) cm−1: 3405, 1701, 1638, 1499, 1457, 1321, 1115, 1040, 862, 742, 700. 1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 1.62 (dd, J = 2.3, 12.7 Hz, 1H), 2.58 (ddd, J = 5.5, 12.8, 12.8 Hz, 1H), 2.67 (dd, J = 0.9, 15.9 Hz, 1H), 2.95 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 2.88-3.08 (m, 1H), 3.01 (d, J = 18.7 Hz, 1H), 3.38 (dd, J = 6.2, 18.7 Hz, 1H), 3.56 (dd, J = 5.3, 13.7 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (s, 1H), 4.47 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H), 5.60 (s, 1H), 6.52 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.62 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.85–7.02 (m, 1H), 7.12 (ddd, J = 1.0, 7.0, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.24–7.42 (m, 5H), 7.53–7.59 (m, 2H), 7.87 (br s, 1H), 10.23 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 29.4, 29.6, 32.9, 39.4, 47.8, 58.6, 59.0, 73.2, 85.0, 110.5, 111.5, 117.8 118.8, 119.5, 119.6, 123.1, 124.1, 126.4, 128.3, 128.9, 129.16, 129.21, 130.6, 137.1, 139.2, 142.8, 152.8. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C29H27O5S [M + H]+: 515.1641. Found: 515.1632. Anal. Calcd for C29H26N2O5S·2H2O·EtOH: C, 62.40; H, 6.08; N, 6.69. Found C, 62.12; H, 5.75; N, 4.43.

6,7-Didehydro-4,5α-epoxy-17-((2-phenylethyl)sulfonyl)indolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-3,14β-diol (9e)

Yield: 79%, white amorphous material, IR (film) cm−1: 3407, 2923, 1504, 1455, 1319, 1146, 1041, 903, 736. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.78 (br d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 2.47 (ddd, J = 5.2, 12.7, 12.7 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 1H), 2.64 (s, 1H), 2.87 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 1H), 3.09–3.24 (m, 4H), 3.30–3.45 (m, 3H), 3. 75 (dd, J = 4.9, 13.8 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (br s, 1H), 5.59 (s, 1H), 6.57 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (dd, J = 7.4, 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.17 (dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.19–7.33 (m, 6H), 7.38 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.31 (s, 1H) 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 20.1, 29.6, 29.9, 33.4, 38.9, 48.1, 54.5, 58.4, 73.2, 84.9, 110.4, 111.5, 117.8, 118.9, 119.6, 119.8, 123.4, 124.2, 126.5, 126.9, 128.42, 128.45, 128.9, 129.2, 137.2, 138.2, 139.3, 145.0. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C30H28N2NaO5S [M + Na]+: 551.1617. Found: 551.1623. Anal. Calcd for C30H28N2O5S·3.5H2O·0.5CHCl3: C, 56.24; H, 5.49; N, 4.30. Found C, 56.36; H, 5.71; N, 3.99.

17-(Cyclopropylsulfonyl)-6,7-didehydro-4,5α-epoxyindolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-3,14β-diol (9f)

Yield: 96%, white amorphous material, IR (film) cm−1: 3400, 2922, 1719, 1638, 1508, 1457, 1322, 1145, 1044, 899, 726, 499. 1H N MR (400 MHz, aceton-d6): δ 0.95–1.14 (m, 4H), 1.73 (dd, J = 2.0, 12.7 Hz, 1H), 2.659 (ddd, J = 5.4, 12.7, 12.7 Hz, 1H), 2.665 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 2.74–2.83 (m, 1H), 2.94 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.11 (ddd, J = 3.5, 13.1, 13.1 Hz, 1H), 3.25 (d, J = 18.7 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (dd, J = 6.7, 18.7 Hz, 1H), 3.70 (dd, J = 5.4, 13.3 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (s, 1H), 4.35 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 5.61 (s, 1H), 6.57 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.63 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (ddd, J = 0.9, 7.1, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (ddd, J = 1.0, 7.1, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.381 (br d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.388 (br d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 10.2 (s, 1H), a proton (OH) was not observed. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.3, 5.7, 29.2, 29.8, 30.0, 32.3, 38.9, 47.8, 58.8, 73.1, 85.2, 110.7, 111.4, 117.8, 118.9, 119.5, 119.6, 123.2, 123.9, 126.4, 128.2, 129.5, 137.1, 139.3, 142.9. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C25H24N2NaO5S [M + Na]+: 487.1304. Found: 487.1283. Anal. Calcd for C25H24N2O5S·1.5H2O·0.2CHCl3: C, 58.72; H, 5.32; N, 5.43. Found C, 58.68; H, 5.16; N, 5.08.

6,7-Didehydro-4,5α-epoxy-17-(ethenylsulfonyl)indolo[2′,3′:6,7]morphinan-3,14β-diol (9g)

Yield: 71%, white amorphous material, IR (film) cm−1: 3400, 1455, 1322, 1146, 903, 738. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.79 (dd, J = 2.1, 12.8 Hz, 1H), 2.46 (ddd, J = 5.3, 12.8, 12.8 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 2.78 (s, 1H), 2.90 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.05 (ddd, J = 3.5, 13.1, 13.1 Hz, 1H), 3.14 (d, J = 18.7 Hz, 1H), 3.32 (dd, J = 6.5, 18.7 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (dd, J = 5.3, 13.3 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.12 (br s, 1H), 5.61 (s, 1H), 5.99 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.639 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.641 (dd, J = 9.8, 16.4 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (dd, J = 7.4, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (dd, J = 7.5, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.29 (m, 1H), 7.39 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.30 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 29.4, 29.6, 32.5, 38.4, 47.9, 58.4, 73.1, 85.1, 110.7, 111.4, 117.8, 118.9, 119.5, 119.8, 123.4, 124.0, 126.5, 127.2, 128.3, 129.3, 135.6, 137.1, 139.3, 142.9. HR-MS (ESI): Calcd for C24H22N2NaO5S [M + Na]+: 473.1147. Found: 473.1138. Anal. Calcd for C24H22N2O5S·EtOH·0.3CHCl3: C, 59.33; H, 5.36; N, 5.26. Found C, 59.17; H, 5.22; N, 5.15.

3.3. Calculation of the Most Stable Conformations of Alkyl-, Amide-, and Sulfonamide-Type Piperidines

The initial geometries of the molecular models for density functional theory (DFT) calculations were prepared using Schrödinger suites (Schrödinger, LLC) [48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. Structural optimizations were performed for the prepared molecular models with ωB97XD/6-31G(d,p) level of theory, respectively. Their vibration frequencies were calculated at the same level to confirm their stationary structure. All of the DFT calculations were performed using the Gaussian09 program [55].

3.4. Bioassays

3.4.1. Membrane Preparation

The human MOR, DOR, or KOR recombinant CHO cell pellets were resuspended in 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer containing 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ethylene glycol bis(2-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N,N-tetraacetic acid (EGTA), pH 7.4. The cell suspensions were disrupted by use of a glassteflon homogeniser and centrifuged at 48,000× g for 15 min. The supernatant was discarded and the pellets were resuspended in buffer at a concentration of 5 mg protein/mL and stored at −80 °C until further use.

3.4.2. Competitive Binding Assays

Human MOR, DOR, or KOR recombinant CHO cell membranes were incubated for 2 h at 25 °C in 0.25 mL of the buffer containing with various concentrations of the tested compound, 2 nM [3H] DAMGO, [3H] DPDPE, or [3H] U69,593 (PerkinElmer, Inc., MA, USA), respectively. The incubation was terminated by collecting membranes on Filtermat B filter (PerkinElmer, Inc.) using a FilterMate™ harvester (PerkinElmer, Inc.). The filters were then washed three times with 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer, pH 7.4. Then, MeltiLex scintillant (PerkinElmer, Inc.) was melted onto the dried filters. Radioactivity was determined by a MicroBeta scintillation counter (PerkinElmer, Inc.). Nonspecific binding was measured in the presence of 10 μM unlabeled DAMGO, DPDPE, or U-69,593 (PerkinElmer, Inc.). Ki and 95% CI values were calculated by Prism software (version 5.0).

3.4.3. [35S]GTPγS Binding Assays

Human MOR, DOR, or KOR recombinant CHO cell membranes were incubated for 2 h at 25 °C in 0.25 mL of 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer containing 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 with various concentrations of the tested compound, 30 μM guanosine 5-diphosphate (GDP) and 0.1 nM [35S]GTPγS (PerkinElmer, Inc.). The incubation was terminated by collecting membranes on Filtermat B filter (PerkinElmer, Inc.) using a FilterMate™ harvester (Perkin Elmer, Inc.). The filters were then washed three times with 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer, pH 7.4. Then, MeltiLex scintillant (PerkinElmer, Inc.) was melted onto the dried filters. Radioactivity was determined by a MicroBeta scintillation counter (PerkinElmer, Inc.). EC50, Emax, and 95% CI values were calculated by Prism software (version 5.0). Nonspecific binding was measured in the presence of 10 μM unlabeled GTPγS (PerkinElmer, Inc.). DPDPE and ICI-174,864 (PerkinElmer, Inc.) were used as the standard DOR full agonist and full inverse agonist, respectively.

4. Conclusions

We synthesized sulfonamide-type NTI derivatives to compare their functional activities for the DOR with those of the corresponding alkyl- and amide-type NTI derivatives. Among them, cyclopropylsulfonamide 9f (SYK-839) was the most potent full inverse agonist. Its potency and efficacy were comparable to those of SYK-623, a previously reported amide-type full inverse agonist. On the other hand, phenethylsulfonamide 9e (SYK-901) showed full agonist activity with moderate potency. Not only the sulfonamide-type NTI derivatives but also the alkyl- and amide-type derivatives, which induced activities for the DOR from full inverse agonist to full agonist, are expected to be useful compounds for investigation of the relationship among the interactions of ligands with the DOR, conformational changes of the DOR, and the induced functional activities.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Synthesis of 5 hydrochloride, previously reported synthetic method of 7, optimization of the reaction conditions for synthesis of 5, synthesis of SYK-903, and 1H and 13C NMR spectra are available online.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H. and H.F.; methodology, H.F.; synthetic experiment, C.I., T.K., and S.I.; evaluation of compounds, S.H.; Analysis and data curation, C.I., A.H., S.H., and H.F.; conformational analysis, D.H. and H.G.; writing, H.G. and H.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We also acknowledge the Institute of Instrumental Analysis of Kitasato University, School of Pharmacy for its facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chalmers, D.T.; Behan, D.P. The use of constitutively active gpcrs in drug discovery and functional genomics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2002, 1, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Costa, T.; Cotecchia, S. Historical review: Negative efficacy and the constitutive activity of G-protein coupled receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2005, 26, 618–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bond, R.A.; IJzerman, A.P. Recent developments in constitutive receptor activity and inverse agonism, and their potential for GPCR drug discovery. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 27, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hirayama, S.; Fujii, H. δ Opioid Receptor Inverse Agonists and their In Vivo Pharmacological Effects. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Recent examples (from ref. 5 to ref. 20), Cherney, R.J.; Cornelius, L.A.M.; Srivastava, A.; Weigelt, C.A.; Marcoux, D.; Duan, J.J.-W.; Shi, Q.; Batt, D.G.; Liu, Q.; Yip, S.; et al. Discovery of BMS-986251: A Clinically Viable, Potent, and Selective RORγt Inverse Agonist. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 1221–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gege, C.; Albers, M.; Kinzel, O.; Kleymann, G.; Schlütera, T.; Steeneck, C.; Hoffmann, T.; Xue, X.; Cummingsc, M.D.; Spurlinoc, J.; et al. Optimization and biological evaluation of thiazole-bis-amide inverse agonists of RORγt. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 127205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nakajima, R.; Oono, H.; Sugiyama, S.; Matsueda, Y.; Ida, T.; Kakuda, S.; Hirata, J.; Baba, A.; Makino, A.; Matsuyama, R.; et al. Discovery of [1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5-a]pyridine Derivatives as Potent and Orally Bioavailable RORγt Inverse Agonists. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sun, N.; Ma, X.; Zhou, K.; Zhu, C.; Cao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xu, J.; Fu, W. Discovery of novel N-sulfonamide- tetrahydroquinolines as potent retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor γt inverse agonists for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 187, 111984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shrader, S.H.; Song, Z. Discovery of endogenous inverse agonists for G protein-coupled receptor 6. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 522, 1041–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Poli, G.; Dimmito, M.P.; Mollica, A.; Zengin, G.; Benyhe, S.; Zador, F.; Stefanucci, A. Discovery of Novel μ-Opioid Receptor Inverse Agonist from a Combinatorial Library of Tetrapeptides through Structure-Based Virtual Screening. Molecules 2019, 24, 3872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sato, A.; Fukase, Y.; Kono, M.; Ochida, A.; Oda, T.; Sasaki, Y.; Ishii, N.; Tomata, Y.; Fukumoto, S.; Imai, Y.N. Design and Synthesis of Conformationally Constrained RORγt Inverse Agonists. ChemMedChem 2019, 14, 1917–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shaikh, N.S.; Iyer, J.P.; Munot, Y.S.; Mukhopadhyay, P.P.; Raje, A.A.; Nagaraj, R.; Jamdar, V.; Gavhane, R.; Lohote, M.; Sherkar, P.; et al. Discovery and pharmacological evaluation of indole derivatives as potent and selective RORγt inverse agonist for multiple autoimmune conditions. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 2208–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lu, Z.; Duan, J.J.-W.; Xiao, H.; Neels, J.; Wu, D.; Weigelt, C.A.; Sack, J.S.; Khan, J.; Ruzanov, M.; An, Y.; et al. Identification of potent, selective and orally bioavailable phenyl ((R)-3-phenylpyrrolidin-3-yl)sulfone analogues as RORγt inverse agonists. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 2265–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Amato, G.; Manke, A.; Wiethe, R.; Vasukuttan, V.; Snyder, R.; Yueh, Y.L.; Decker, A.; Runyon, S.; Maitra, R. Functionalized 6-(Piperidin-1-yl)-8,9-Diphenyl Purines as Peripherally Restricted Inverse Agonists of the CB1 Receptor. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 6330–6345. [Google Scholar]
  15. Amaudrut, J.; Argiriadi, M.A.; Barth, M.; Breinlinger, E.C.; Bressac, D.; Broqua, P.; Calderwood, D.J.; Chatar, M.; Cusac, K.P.; Gauld, S.B.; et al. Discovery of novel quinoline sulphonamide derivatives as potent, selective and orally active RORγ inverse agonists. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 1799–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tanis, V.M.; Venkatesan, H.; Cummings, M.D.; Albers, M.; Barbay, J.K.; Herman, K.; Kummer, D.A.; Milligan, C.; Nelen, M.I.; Nishimura, R.; et al. 3-Substituted Quinolines as RORγt Inverse Agonists. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 1463–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Xue, X.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, R.; Zhang, C.; Wang, C.; Shi, Y.; Zou, L.; et al. Discovery and Characterization of XY101, a Potent, Selective, and Orally Bioavailable RORγ Inverse Agonist for Treatment of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 4716–4730. [Google Scholar]
  18. Troxler, T.; Feuerbach, D.; Zhang, X.; Yang, C.R.; Lagu, B.; Perrone, M.; Wang, T.-L.; Briner, K.; Bock, M.G.; Auberson, Y.P. The Discovery of LML134, a Histamine H3 Receptor Inverse Agonist for the Clinical Treatment of Excessive Sleep Disorders. ChemMedChem 2019, 14, 1238–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kim, J.; Song, J.; Ji, H.D.; Yoo, E.K.; Lee, J.-E.; Lee, S.B.; Oh, J.M.; Lee, S.; Hwang, J.S.; Yoon, H.; et al. Discovery of Potent, Selective, and Orally Bioavailable Estrogen-Related Receptor-γ Inverse Agonists To Restore the Sodium Iodide Symporter Function in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 1837–1858. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nirogi, R.; Shinde, A.; Mohammed, A.R.; Badange, R.K.; Reballi, V.; Bandyala, T.R.; Saraf, S.K.; Bojja, K.; Manchineella, S.; Achanta, P.K.; et al. Discovery and Development of N-[4-(1-Cyclobutylpiperidin-4-yloxy)phenyl]-2-(morpholin-4-yl)acetamide Dihydrochloride (SUVNG3031): A Novel, Potent, Selective, and Orally Active Histamine H3 Receptor Inverse Agonist with Robust Wake-Promoting Activity. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 1203–1217. [Google Scholar]
  21. Costa, T.; Herz, A. Antagonists with negative intrinsic activity at δ opioid receptors coupled to GTP-binding proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 7321–7325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Shaw, W.N. Long-term treatment of obese Zucker rats with LY255582 and other appetite suppressants. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1993, 46, 653–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Emmerson, P.J.; McKinzie, J.H.; Surface, P.L.; Suter, T.M.; Mitch, C.H.; Statnick, M.A. Na+ modulation, inverse agonism, and anorectic potency of 4-phenylpiperidine opioid antagonists. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2004, 494, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hirayama, S.; Iwai, T.; Higashi, E.; Nakamura, M.; Iwamatsu, C.; Itoh, K.; Nemoto, T.; Tanabe, M.; Fujii, H. Discovery of δ opioid receptor full inverse agonists and their effects on restraint stress induced cognitive impairment in mice. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 2237–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Higashi, E.; Hirayama, S.; Nikaido, J.; Shibasaki, M.; Kono, T.; Honjo, A.; Ikeda, H.; Kamei, J.; Fujii, H. Development of novel δ opioid receptor inverse agonists without a basic nitrogen atom and their antitussive effects in mice. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019, 10, 3939–3945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nemoto, T.; Iihara, Y.; Hirayama, S.; Iwai, T.; Higashi, E.; Fujii, H.; Nagase, H. Naltrindole derivatives with fluorinated ethyl substituents on the 17-nitrogen as δ opioid receptor inverse agonists. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 2927–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Portoghese, P.S.; Sultana, M.; Nagase, H.; Takemori, A.E. Application of the message-address concept in the design of highly potent and selective non-peptide δ opioid receptor antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 281–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Portoghese, P.S.; Sultana, M.; Takemori, A.E. Design of peptidomimetic δ opioid receptor antagonists using the message-address concept. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 1714–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fujii, H.; Uchida, Y.; Shibasaki, M.; Nishida, M.; Yoshioka, T.; Kobayashi, R.; Honjo, A.; Itoh, K.; Yamada, D.; Hirayama, S.; et al. Discovery of δ opioid receptor full agonists lacking a basic nitrogen atom and their antidepressant-like effects. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 127176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Casy, A.F.; Parfitt, R.T. Opioid Analgesics: Chemistry and Receptors; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1986; pp. 9–104. [Google Scholar]
  31. Che, T.; Majumdar, S.; Zaidi, S.A.; Ondachi, P.; McCorvy, J.D.; Wang, S.; Mosier, P.D.; Uprety, R.; Vardy, E.; Krumm, B.E.; et al. Structure of the Nanobody-Stabilized Active State of the Kappa Opioid Receptor. Cell 2018, 172, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Huang, W.; Manglik, A.; Venkatakrishnan, A.J.; Laeremans, T.; Feinberg, E.N.; Sanborn, A.L.; Kato, H.E.; Livingston, K.E.; Thorsen, T.S.; Kling, R.C.; et al. Structural insights into μ-opioid receptor activation. Nature 2015, 524, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Fenalti, G.; Giguere, P.M.; Katritch, V.; Huang, X.-P.; Thompson, A.A.; Cherezov, V.; Roth, B.L.; Stevens, R.C. Molecular control of δ-opioid receptor signaling. Nature 2014, 506, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Granier, S.; Manglik, A.; Kruse, A.C.; Kobilka, T.S.; Thian, F.S.; Weis, W.I.; Kobilka, B.K. Structure of the δ-opioid receptor bound to naltrindole. Nature 2012, 485, 400–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Manglik, A.; Kruse, A.C.; Kobilka, T.S.; Thian, F.S.; Mathiesen, J.M.; Sunahara, R.K.; Pardo, L.; Weis, W.I.; Kobilka, B.K.; Granier, S. Crystal structure of the μ-opioid receptor bound to a morphinan antagonist. Nature 2012, 485, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Mafi, A.; Kim, S.-K.; Goddard, W.A., III. The atomistic level structure for the activated human κ-opioid receptor bound to the full Gi protein and the MP1104 agonist. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 5836–5843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Koehl, A.; Hu, H.; Maeda, S.; Zhang, Y.; Qu, Q.; Paggi, J.M.; Latorraca, N.R.; Hilger, D.; Dawson, R.; Matile, H.; et al. Structure of the μ-opioid receptor–Gi protein complex. Nature 2018, 558, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Roth, B.L.; Baner, K.; Westkaemper, R.; Siebert, D.; Rice, K.C.; Steinberg, S.; Ernsberger, P.; Rothman, R.B. Salvinorin A: A potent naturally occurring non-nitrogenous κ opioid selective agonist. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 11934–11939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Yamaotsu, N.; Fujii, H.; Nagase, H.; Hirono, S. Identification of the three-dimensional pharmacophore of κ-opioid receptor agonists. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 4446–4452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Olofson, R.A.; Martz, J.T.; Senet, J.P.; Piteau, M.; Malfroot, T. A New Reagent for the Selective, High-Yield N-Dealkylation of Tertiary Amines: Improved Syntheses of Naltrexone and Nalbuphine. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 2081–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Olofson, R.A.; Schnur, R.C.; Bunes, L.; Pepe, J.P. Selective N-dealkylation of tertiary amines with vinyl chloroformate: An improved synthesis of naloxone. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 18, 1567–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Montzka, T.A.; Matiskella, J.D.; Partyka, R.A. 2,2,2-trichloroethyl chloroformate: A general reagent for demethylation of tertiary methylamines. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 15, 1325–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fujii, H.; Imaide, S.; Watanabe, A.; Nemoto, T.; Nagase, H. Novel cleavage reaction of the C16–N17 bond in naltrexone derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 6293–6296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wuts, P.G.M. Greene’s Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 5th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 921–923. [Google Scholar]
  45. McLamore, S.; Ullrich, T.; Rothman, R.B.; Xu, H.; Dersch, C.; Coop, A.; Davis, P.; Porreca, F.; Jacobson, A.E.; Rice, K.C. Effect of N-Alkyl and N-Alkenyl Substituents in Noroxymorphindole, 17-Substituted-6,7-dehydro-4,5α-epoxy-3,14-dihydroxy-6,7:2′,3′-indolomorphinans, on Opioid Receptor Affinity, Selectivity, and Efficacy. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1471–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Portoghese, P.S.; Larson, D.L.; Sultana, M.; Takemori, A.E. Opioid Agonist and Antagonist Activities of Morphindoles Related to Naltrindole. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 4325–4329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ishikawa, K.; Karaki, F.; Tayama, K.; Higashi, E.; Hirayama, S.; Itoh, K.; Fujii, H. C-Homomorphinan Derivatives as Lead Compounds to Obtain Safer and More Clinically Useful Analgesics. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 65, 920–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Sastry, G.M.; Adzhigirey, M.; Day, T.; Annabhimoju, R.; Sherman, W. Protein and Ligand Preparation: Parameters, Protocols, and Influence on Virtual Screening Enrichments. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2013, 27, 221–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bell, J.A.; Cao, Y.; Gunn, J.R.; Day, T.; Gallicchio, E.; Zhou, Z.; Levy, R.; Farid, R. PrimeX and the Schrödinger Computational Chemistry Suite of Programs. Int. Tables Crystallogr. 2012, 534–538. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jorgensen, W.L.; Tirado-Rives, J. The OPLS [Optimized Potentials for Liquid Simulations] Potential Functions for Proteins, Energy Minimizations for Crystals of Cyclic Peptides and Crambin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1657–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shivakumar, D.; Williams, J.; Wu, Y.; Damm, W.; Shelley, J.; Sherman, W. Prediction of Absolute Solvation Free Energies using Molecular Dynamics Free Energy Perturbation and the OPLS Force Field. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 1509–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Harder, E.; Damm, W.; Maple, J.; Wu, C.; Reboul, M.; Xiang, J.Y.; Wang, L.; Lupyan, D.; Dahlgren, M.K.; Knight, J.L.; et al. OPLS3: A Force Field Providing Broad Coverage of Drug-like Small Molecules and Proteins. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Greenwood, J.R.; Calkins, D.; Sullivan, A.P.; Shelley, J.C. Towards the Comprehensive, Rapid, and Accurate Prediction of the Favorable Tautomeric States of Drug-Like Molecules in Aqueous Solution. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2010, 24, 591–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Shelley, J.C.; Cholleti, A.; Frye, L.; Greenwood, J.R.; Timlin, M.R.; Uchimaya, M. Epik: A Software Program for pKa Prediction and Protonation State Generation for Drug-Like Molecules. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Design 2007, 21, 681–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision D.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford CT, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
Sample Availability: Samples of SYK-623, SYK-753, SYK-839, SYK-901, and SYK-903 are available from the authors.
Molecules 25 03792 g001 550
Figure 1. Structures of SYK-623 (DOR full inverse agonist), NTI (DOR neutral antagonist), and SYK-882 (DOR full agonist).
Figure 1. Structures of SYK-623 (DOR full inverse agonist), NTI (DOR neutral antagonist), and SYK-882 (DOR full agonist).
Molecules 25 03792 g001
Molecules 25 03792 g002 550
Figure 2. The most stable conformations of 1-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)piperidine (A), 1-(trifluoroacetyl)piperidine (B), and 1-(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)piperidine (C). The conformers were obtained by the ωB97XD/6-31G(d,p) level calculation.
Figure 2. The most stable conformations of 1-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)piperidine (A), 1-(trifluoroacetyl)piperidine (B), and 1-(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)piperidine (C). The conformers were obtained by the ωB97XD/6-31G(d,p) level calculation.
Molecules 25 03792 g002
Molecules 25 03792 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the key intermediate 7. Reagents and conditions: (a) PhNHNH2·HCl, MeSO3H, EtOH, reflux, 99%; (b) Ac2O, 85 °C, 95%; (c) Troc-Cl, K2CO3, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, reflux, 92%; (d) 4 M NaOH aq, MeOH, reflux, 5: 60% from 3, 6: 21% from 3; (e) 4 M NaOH aq, THF, reflux, 5: 72% from 3, 6: trace from 3; (f) TBSCl, imidazole, DMF, rt, 70%.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the key intermediate 7. Reagents and conditions: (a) PhNHNH2·HCl, MeSO3H, EtOH, reflux, 99%; (b) Ac2O, 85 °C, 95%; (c) Troc-Cl, K2CO3, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, reflux, 92%; (d) 4 M NaOH aq, MeOH, reflux, 5: 60% from 3, 6: 21% from 3; (e) 4 M NaOH aq, THF, reflux, 5: 72% from 3, 6: trace from 3; (f) TBSCl, imidazole, DMF, rt, 70%.
Molecules 25 03792 sch001
Molecules 25 03792 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of sulfonamide-type NTI derivatives 9. Reagents and conditions: (a) RSO2Cl, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 46–98%; (b) ClCH2CH2SO2Cl, 0.5 M NaOH aq, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 56% (8g); (c) 1.0 M TBAF, THF, rt, 71–96%.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of sulfonamide-type NTI derivatives 9. Reagents and conditions: (a) RSO2Cl, Et3N, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 46–98%; (b) ClCH2CH2SO2Cl, 0.5 M NaOH aq, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 56% (8g); (c) 1.0 M TBAF, THF, rt, 71–96%.
Molecules 25 03792 sch002
Table
Table 1. Binding affinities of compounds 9 for the opioid receptors a and functional activities of compounds 9 for the DOR b.
Table 1. Binding affinities of compounds 9 for the opioid receptors a and functional activities of compounds 9 for the DOR b.
Molecules 25 03792 i001
CompdRBinding Affinity, nM (95% CI)Functional Activity for DOR
Ki (DOR)Ki (MOR)Ki (KOR)EC50, nM (95% CI)Emax, % (95% CI)
DPDPE c―NT dNT dNT d4.66 (2.08–10.4)100 e
ICI-174,864 c―422 (215–829)NT dNT d114 (67.9–192)−100 f
NTI c―0.457 (0.192–1.09)30.7 (12.5–75.4)14.7 (3.16–68.5)ND g7.50 h
9aMe284 (151–535)10,100 (1920–16,600)ND g0.468 (0.0816–2.68)−48.8 (−58.2–−39.5)
9bCF3365 (193–692)11,800 (1740–80,300)675 (210–2170)ND g−36.1 h
9cPh49.6 (26.2–93.9)20,500 (1560–269,000)95.6 (41.4–220)ND gND g
9dBn734 (326–1660)5180 (1930–13,900)18,800 (6010–58,800)310 (82.1–177)47.1 (36.9–57.3)
9ePhenethyl132 (57.0–304)1400 (261–7440)17,800 (6840–46,300)75.8 (39.5–146)88.1 (79.2–97.0)
9fc-Pr7.44 (3.53–15.7)3900 (1450–10,500)13.6 (5.45–33.7)1.59 (0.825–3.05)−80.5 (−87.7–−73.4)
9gvinyl196 (87.5–440)3570 (1420–8970)59,100 (2190–160,000)7.80 (1.58–38.4)−80.2 (−97.8–−62.6)
a Evaluated by the ability of each compound to displace [3H]DAMGO (MOR), [3H]DPDPE (DOR), or [3H]U-69,593 (KOR) binding to the CHO cells expressing human MOR, DOR, or KOR. The data represent means of three samples. b Membranes were incubated with [35S]GTPγS and GDP in the presence of the test compound. The human DOR recombinant cell membrane (CHO) was used in this assay. The data represent means of three samples. c From ref. [24]. d NT: Not tested. e DPDPE (1 μM) was used as the standard DOR agonist. f ICI-174,864 (10 μM) was used as the standard DOR inverse agonist. g ND: Not determined. h Percent stimulation at 10 μM of the tested compound. 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Table
Table 2. Comparison of binding affinity and functional activity for the DOR among the corresponding alkyl-, amide-, and sulfonamide-type NTI derivatives.
Table 2. Comparison of binding affinity and functional activity for the DOR among the corresponding alkyl-, amide-, and sulfonamide-type NTI derivatives.
Molecules 25 03792 i002
RAlkyl-Type, X = CH2
(95% CI)		Amide-Type, X = CO
(95% CI)		Sulfonamide-Type, X = SO2
(95% CI)
MeSYK-323 a
Ki = 2.71 nM (1.93–3.82)
EC50: ND c
Emax: ND c		SYK-747 b
Ki = 977 nM (332–2,880)
EC50: ND c
Emax = −4.86% d		9a (SYK-884)
Ki = 284 nM (151–535)
EC50 = 0.468 nM (0.0816–2.68)
Emax = −48.8% (−58.2–−39.5)
CF3SYK-165 a
Ki = 134 nM (75.4–239)
EC50 = 45.5 nM (17.5–118)
Emax = −44.8% (−51.9–−37.7)		SYK-752 b
Ki = 7.84 nM (4.30–14.3)
EC50: ND c
Emax = −1.10% d		9b (SYK-837)
Ki = 365 nM (193–692)
EC50: ND c
Emax = −36.1% d
PhSYK-619 e
Ki = 15.8 nM (7.23–34.7)
EC50 = 16.1 nM (7.31–35.4)
Emax = −56.5% (−63.3–−49.8)		SYK-736 b
Ki = 290 nM (177–476)
EC50 = 322 nM (51.5–2,010)
Emax = −92.7% (−122–−62.6)		9c (SYK-838)
Ki = 49.6 nM (26.2–93.9)
EC50: ND c
Emax: ND c
BnSYK-707 e
Ki = 1.94 nM (1.50–2.50)
EC50 = 15.1 nM (2.67–85.0)
Emax = 40.3% (30.4–50.2)		SYK-754 f
Ki = 89.0 nM (66.6–119)
EC50 = 127 nM (80.1–201)
Emax = 88.5% (81.6–95.3)		9d (SYK-887)
Ki = 734 nM (326–1,660)
EC50 = 310 nM (82.1–117)
Emax = 47.1% (36.9–57.3)
PhenethylSYK-903 g
Ki = 166 nM (65.5–419)
EC50 = 7.37 nM (3.80–14.3)
Emax = 105% (96.2–114)		SYK-753 f
Ki = 41.5 nM (28.5–60.6)
EC50 = 132 nM (51.5–336)
Emax = 97.5% (82.6–112)		9e (SYK-901)
Ki = 132 nM (57.0–304)
EC50 = 75.8 nM (39.5–146)
Emax = 88.1% (79.2–97.0)
c-PrNTI e
Ki = 0.46 nM (0.192–1.09)
EC50: ND c
Emax = 7.50% d		SYK-623 b
Ki = 17.3 nM (10.3–28.9)
EC50 = 0.969 nM (0.406–2.93)
Emax = −91.2% (−99.8–−82.7)		9f (SYK-839)
Ki = 7.44 nM (3.53–15.7)
EC50 = 1.59 nM (0.825–3.05)
Emax = −80.5% (−87.7–−73.4)
vinylSYK-706 e
Ki = 0.609 nM (0.407–0.913)
EC50 = 101 nM (4.46–2,280)
Emax = 16.2% (8.14–24.3)		SYK-836 b
Ki = 1.16 nM (0.508–2.63)
EC50 = 1.43 nM (0.819–2.59)
Emax = −86.2% (−92.2–−80.2)		9g (SYK-886)
Ki = 196 nM (87.5–440)
EC50 = 7.80 nM (1.58–38.4)
Emax = −80.2% (−97.8–−62.6)
  : Full agonist (Emax ≥ 80%),   : partial agonist (80% > Emax ≥ 10%),   : neutral antagonist (10% > Emax > −10%),   : partial inverse agonist (−10% ≥ Emax > -80%),   : full inverse agonist (−80% ≥ Emax). a From ref. [26]. b From ref. [25]. c ND: Not determined. d Percent stimulation at 10 μM of the tested compound. e From ref. [24]. f From ref. [29]. g SYK-903 was newly synthesized and evaluated in comparison with SYK-836 and SYK-886. The synthetic method and its spectral data are described in the Supporting Information. The data represent means of three or four samples. 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iwamatsu, C.; Hayakawa, D.; Kono, T.; Honjo, A.; Ishizaki, S.; Hirayama, S.; Gouda, H.; Fujii, H. Effects of N-Substituents on the Functional Activities of Naltrindole Derivatives for the δ Opioid Receptor: Synthesis and Evaluation of Sulfonamide Derivatives. Molecules 2020, 25, 3792. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173792

AMA Style

Iwamatsu C, Hayakawa D, Kono T, Honjo A, Ishizaki S, Hirayama S, Gouda H, Fujii H. Effects of N-Substituents on the Functional Activities of Naltrindole Derivatives for the δ Opioid Receptor: Synthesis and Evaluation of Sulfonamide Derivatives. Molecules. 2020; 25(17):3792. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173792

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iwamatsu, Chiharu, Daichi Hayakawa, Tomomi Kono, Ayaka Honjo, Saki Ishizaki, Shigeto Hirayama, Hiroaki Gouda, and Hideaki Fujii. 2020. "Effects of N-Substituents on the Functional Activities of Naltrindole Derivatives for the δ Opioid Receptor: Synthesis and Evaluation of Sulfonamide Derivatives" Molecules 25, no. 17: 3792. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173792

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop