Next Article in Journal
A Hidden Coordination-Bond Torsional Deformation as a Sign of Possible Spin Transition in Nickel(II)-Bis(nitroxide) Compounds
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis, In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation for Acetylcholinesterase and BACE-1 Inhibitory Activity of Some N-Substituted-4-Phenothiazine-Chalcones
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis, Structure and Supramolecular Properties of a Novel C3 Cryptand with Pyridine Units in the Bridges
Previous Article in Special Issue
High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning (HR-MAS) NMR-Based Fingerprints Determination in the Medicinal Plant Berberis laurina
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chromene- and Quinoline-3-Carbaldehydes: Useful Intermediates in the Synthesis of Heterocyclic Scaffolds

by
Djenisa H. A. Rocha
1,2,
Vasco F. Batista
1,
Emanuel J. F. Balsa
1,
Diana C. G. A. Pinto
1,* and
Artur M. S. Silva
1
1
LAQV-REQUIMTE & Department of Chemistry, Campus de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
2
CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials & Department of Chemistry, Campus de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(17), 3791; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173791
Submission received: 27 July 2020 / Revised: 14 August 2020 / Accepted: 19 August 2020 / Published: 20 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 25th Anniversary of Molecules—Recent Advances in Organic Synthesis)

Abstract

:
Chromenes and quinolines are recognized as important scaffolds in medicinal chemistry. Herein, the efficient use of chromene- and quinoline-3-carbaldehydes to synthesize other valuable heterocycles is described. These carbaldehydes are obtained in excellent yields through the Vilsmeyer-Haack reaction of flavanones and azaflavanones. Protocols towards the synthesis of new heterocycles, such as 3H-chromeno[3–c]quinolines, (Z/E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styryl-2H-chromenes, and (E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styrylquinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehydes were established. Altogether, we demonstrate the value of chromene- and quinoline-3-carbaldehydes as building blocks.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The synthesis of new heterocyclic compounds is a significant aspect of medicinal chemistry due to the recognized value of this type of compound in the development of new drugs. In this regard, quinoline and chromene cores are interesting frameworks owing to their established medicinal value. Biological activities, such as anticancer [1,2], antimicrobial [3,4,5], anti-Alzheimer’s [6], antioxidant [7], and cardiovascular [8], can be highlighted. These nuclei can be found in natural compounds [9,10,11,12] and synthetic materials [13,14,15].
In this manuscript, the usefulness of 4-chloro(chromene- and quinoline)-3-carbaldehydes in the synthesis of other significant heterocycles is described. Moreover, the 4-chloro(chromene- and quinoline)-3-carbaldehydes 2 are easily obtained, in good to excellent yields, through a Vilsmeyer-Haack reaction (Scheme 1) using flavanones 1 (X = O) and 2-aryl-2,3-dihydroquinolines 1 (X = NH, azaflavanones), respectively. Recently we established a straightforward protocol to achieve, in excellent yields, these flavanone and azaflavanone derivatives [16].
Among the significant heterocycles described are indole and quinoline derivatives recognized bioactive alkaloids, for which-New synthetic methodologies are always essential to be established. Moreover, the study of the use of 4-chloro(chromene- and quinoline)-3-carbaldehydes 2 in Wittig reactions is also described and allowed the synthesis of interesting derivatives bearing a 3-styryl moiety. The work herein reported, besides the diversity of structures obtained, also demonstrates the scope of the transformations.

2. Results and Discussion

The Vilsmeyer-Haack formylation is an everyday procedure in our group [17,18] that was easily used in the formylation of flavanones 1 (Scheme 1, X = O) and, in the case of azaflavanones 1, (Scheme 1, X = NH), required a few optimization steps. The quantities used and the reaction time were adjusted to ensure the total formylation at botH-N-1 and C-3 and consequently avoid monoformylated derivatives.
Nuclear magnetic resonance experiments confirmed the structures of both 2-aryl-4-chloro-2H-chromene-3-carbaldehydes 2ac and 2-aryl-4-chloro-1,2-dihydroquinoline-1,3-dicarbaldehydes 2df. The most typical features in their 1H-NMR spectra are the singlets at δ = 6.33–6.47 and 6.88–7.00 ppm corresponding to the resonance of H-2, respectively, for compounds 2ac and 2df. Other important signals are seen at δ = 10.27–10.32 and 10.30–10.33 ppm due to the formyl protons’ resonances. In the 13C-NMR spectra, the signal due to the 3-CHO at δ = 187.6–188.2 ppm and the signal due to C-2 at δ = 73.8–75.0 ppm for compounds 2ac and at δ = 50.2–50.6 ppm for compounds 2df should be highlighted.
The indole nucleus is a prominent constituent of alkaloids such as serotonin and melatonin [19,20] and is also present in many bioactive alkaloids. Antitumoral [21,22], anti-arrhythmic [19], anti-inflammatory [23], antimicrobial [24], and antihypertensive properties are amongst the reported biological activities. The synthesis of indole derivatives is largely explored due to relevant biological applications described for this scaffold, and there are reports on the synthesis of indole hybrids [25,26,27]. We thought it would be interesting to obtain chromene-indole hybrids, so we studied the reaction of 2-aryl-4-chloro-2H-chromene-3-carbaldehydes 2ac with indole (3). Unexpectedly, complex mixtures of compounds were obtained. The two major products’ isolation suggested that they were derivatives presenting one and two indole units, respectively.
Furthermore, the 2-aryl-4-chloro-2H-chromene-3-carbaldehyde derivative was recovered as well as some degradation products. The amount of DMSO used was optimized to a minimum, to allow an excellent stirring. The best reaction temperature was established at 130 °C, to avoid the loss of the formyl group. The amount of indole 3 added was established to prevent mixtures of hybrids and maximize the yield of the two indole unit hybrid. This careful optimization of the reaction conditions allowed us to obtain a single compound (Scheme 2) in very good yields (60 to 84%).
The MS spectrum of the obtained compound suggested that it should contain two indole units. Furthermore, the NMR experiments confirmed this hypothesis and allowed us to establish that the obtained compounds were 3,3′-[(2-aryl-4-chloro-2H-chromen-3-yl)methylene]bis(1H-indoles) 4ac as depicted in Scheme 2. We believe that the indole carbon C-3 nucleophilicity is high and that the formyl carbon electrophilicity favors the reaction with a second indole unit. The main NMR features are: (i) NH proton resonances at δ = 10.32–10.61 and 11.06–11.16 ppm, appearing as doublets (J ≈ 2 Hz) due to their coupling with H-2 in each indole unit; (ii) methinic proton of the carbon linked to the two indole units, a singlet at δ = 6.14–6.25 ppm.
Next, the reactivity of 2-aryl-4-chloro-2H-chromene-3-carbaldehydes 2ac with anilines 5 was studied. The main objective was to obtain quinoline derivatives by forming an imine intermediate, followed by its cyclization with the elimination of hydrochloric acid (Scheme 3).
The first attempts, reacting 4-chloro-2-phenyl-2H-chromene-3-carbaldehyde 2a with aniline, gave a mixture of products and indications that the imine derivative was either not stable, or not able to resist the purification steps. Therefore, we decided to control the reaction by TLC, adding TFA to promote the in situ cyclization immediately after the consumption of the 2a. This procedure proved efficient and allowed the synthesis of the desired 6-phenyl-6H-chromeno[3,4-c]quinoline 7a in moderate yield. Naturally, the reaction scope was further evaluated (Scheme 3). Although the reaction occurs with certain success, we notice that the first step requires variable reaction times (from 1.5 to 2.5 h), whereas the second step was accomplished in an additional 72 h. Other relevant results include the lower or nonexistent reactivity of derivatives having nitro groups as substituents; only two novel compounds, 7c and 7f, were obtained, the former in low yield (25%). On the other hand, the presence of activating groups in the chromene-3-carbaldehydes, such as OCH3, improve the yield, cases of 7d (50%), and 7e (75%). That is more evident when two methoxy substituents are present in aniline, which increased reactivity, and all derivatives were obtained in very good yields (7b, 63%; 7e, 75%, 7f, 73%). We were also able to isolate two imine derivatives (Scheme 3) in low yields, and 6f was obtained only when the second step was shortened 48 h.
The main features in the NMR characterization of 6-aryl-6H-chromeno[3,4-c]quinolines 7af are the two singlets at δ = 6.32–6.44 and 7.30–7.60 ppm due to, respectively, H-6 and H-7 resonances. Another typical signal is the double doublet appearing at δ = 8.40–8.55 ppm and corresponding to the H-1 resonance. These signals were not only in agreement with the proposed structure (Scheme 3) but also showed essential connectivities in the HMBC spectra that allowed the full characterization of the synthesized 6-aryl-6H-chromeno[3,4-c]quinolines 7af.
3-Styrylchromenes constitute a small group of synthetic compounds recently reported for their antiviral [3], cytotoxic [28], and antimicrotubular activity [29]. Several methods for the synthesis of the 3-styryl-2H-chromene nucleus have been described, including the Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons [3] and Wittig [29] reactions. Considering this, we decided to assess the reactivity of 2-aryl-4-chloro-2H-chromene-3-carbaldehydes 2ac in a Wittig reaction with aromatic ylides 9 (Scheme 4). Our first approach was to use a previously established procedure [30], although with some adaptations, mainly in the reaction times and the amount of base. The two isomers were always obtained, with a clear preference for (Z)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styryl-2H-chromenes 11af (Table 1, Scheme 4), as predicted by Wittig reaction selectivity [31].
The optimization steps demonstrated that the Wittig reaction results are dependent on both the aldehyde 2 and the ylide 9. It is clear that the ylide 9c, having an electron-donating group, requires less time to be formed, depends on the amount of base used and, in our opinion, also on the solvent dryness; freshly distilled THF holds better results (Table 1). The aldehyde 2a was less reactive. It requires longer reaction times, and the major isomer is obtained in lower yields (Table 1). Another interesting result is that aldehyde 2c presents better results if the second step is performed at room temperature (Table 1); in fact, reflux promotes aldehyde decomposition instead of improving its reactivity.
The most important features of the 1H-NMR spectra of 2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styryl-2H-chromenes 10ai and 11ai are the signals of the vinylic protons, which allowed the establishment of the system absolute configuration. In the (Z)-isomer 10ai, the resonance of H-β (6.56-6.74 ppm) appears at higher frequency values than those of H-α (6.22–6.63 ppm), and the stereochemistry of the vinylic system was established as (Z) due to typical coupling constant values (3JH-α-H-β 12.1–12.3 Hz). In contrast, in the (E)-isomer 11ai, is the resonance of H-α (7.42–7.75 ppm) that appears at higher frequency values, due to the chlorine atom’s proximity, than those of H-β (6.42–6.50 ppm). The vinylic system’s stereochemistry was established as (E) due to typical coupling constant values (3JH-α-H-β 16.5–16.6 Hz) and confirmed by the NOESY experiments.
The success achieved in the synthesis of 2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styryl-2H-chromene derivatives prompt us to use the 2-aryl-4-chloro-1,2-dihydroquinoline-1,3-dicarbaldehydes 2df, aiming to obtain new (Z- and E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styrylquinolines. Therefore, we considered a previously established procedure for the synthesis of 3-styryl-4-quinolones [32], using the reaction of 2-aryl-4-chloro-1,2-dihydroquinoline-1,3-dicarbaldehydes 2df with ylides 9ac formed in situ from the phosphonium salts 8ac (Scheme 5). A color change and TLC analysis controlled the formation of ylide, being the ideal time for the ylides formation 15 min, 3 min, and 7 min, respectively, for 9a, 9b, and 9c. After the ylide formation, aldehydes 2df were added to the reaction mixture. The first results were not as good as expected (Table 2; Entries 1, 8, and 15). As so, the reaction conditions were individually studied (Table 2). The analysis of Table 2 shows that the results depend on the aldehyde’s reactivity and that the second step’s reaction time is a crucial parameter for the transformation.
Another significant observation is that in this reaction, the (E)-isomer was the major product. In contrast, the (Z)-isomer was obtained in vestigial amounts or just detected as an impurity in the 1H-NMR spectra. For this reason, none of the (Z)-isomers were obtained as pure compounds. In a few cases (Table 2; Entries 4, 5, 18, and 19), we could not isolate the (E)-isomer, because they are light-sensitive, especially when in solution or silica gel. In other cases, increasing the second step reaction time allowed the yield improvement (Table 2; Entries 3, 7, 14, and 16).
The ylide’s reactivity seems to influence the result, with the ylide 9c (R1=NO2) as the less reactive, probably due to the electron-withdrawing group. Although 9b (R1=OCH2CH3) appeared to be more reactive, with shorter reaction times in a few examples (Table 2; Entries 11 and 17), the yields were not as good as expected. In terms of the aldehyde’s reactivity, 2-aryl-4-chloro-1,2-dihydroquinoline-1,3-dicarbaldehyde 2e is the most reactive. We were able to obtain all (E)-isomers, some in moderate yields (Table 2; Entries 8 and 14). Three crucial conclusions can be reached from these results:
(i)
2-Aryl-4-chloro-1,2-dihydroquinoline-1,3-dicarbaldehydes 2df are not as reactive as the 2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styryl-2H-chromenes 2ac;
(ii)
The common Wittig reaction stereoselectivity was not observed, the (E)-isomer was obtained;
(iii)
The formyl group at C-1 did not undergo Wittig reaction, naturally because of the amide carbonyl group’s lower nucleophilicity.
The main features in the 1H-NMR spectra of (E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styrylquinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehydes 12ai are the resonances of H-α and H-β, which appear as two doublets at δ = 7.40–7.74 and 6.69–6.81 ppm, respectively, and have coupling constants (J ≈ 16 Hz) typical of an (E)-configuration. The depicted 3-styryl group conformation (Scheme 5) was confirmed by NOESY experiments in whicH-NOE correlations between H-β and H-2, H-2′ were observed.
A DFT analysis on the reaction of benzyl triphenylphosphonium ylide with 2a was performed to rationalize the abnormal selectivity obtained with the used complex aldehydes, considering the possible formation of both (E and Z)-isomers. Previous reports have shown that the Wittig reaction mechanism witH-Non-stabilized and semi-stabilized ylides proceeds through an early four-centre transition state leading to the irreversible formation of a phosphoxetane intermediate; evidence clearly discards the alternative existence of a betaine species. The reaction then passes through a secondary transition state as the phosphoxetane degenerates to the desired alkene product. It has been established in the literature that this first transition state’s nature determines the stereochemistry of the reaction, locking the relative position of the aldehyde and ylide irreversibly [31].
Preliminary studies using the low level of theory B3LYP/STO-3G* to investigate the Wittig reaction mechanism for these substrates were performed. Indeed, we verified the existence of a first high-energy transition state (TS1), leading to planar OPA intermediates (Scheme 6). Significant puckering was observed in TS1 for the (Z)-isomer, reducing unfavourable interactions between the aldehyde and ylide substituents. The latter formation of the alkene undergoes a second transition state (TS2) with the P-C bond’s advanced cleavage. Here too, some puckering is observed. Most importantly, this secondary transition state was much lower in energy than TS1, supporting our hypothesis that selectivity is controlled by relative configuration at TS1 and that the reaction is irreversible after this point.
Graph 1 shows the calculated potential energy profile for the reaction in study, here using a more precise 6-31G(d) basis set. A similar high-energy transition state preceding phosphoxetane formation was found for both configurations. The transition state TS1, shown in Scheme 6, has a geometry consistent with previous works, with advanced formation of the C-C bond (1.94–2.14 Â) but mainly electrostatic P-O interaction over 3 Â. The energy barrier of this rate-determining step of over 10 kcal/mol is higher than expected. This is most likely due to the complexity of the aldehyde structure, increasing steric constraints in the transition state, and the charge distribution to the conjugated heterocyclic ring.
Comparing both isomers (Figure 1), significantly lower energy was found for the TS leading to the (E)-isomer, in clear contradiction with most experimental and computational studies on semi-stabilized ylides but in agreement with our experimental results. This suggests that additional factors may play a role. In both cases, the transition state has an early character (C-C bond ~2.1 Â) that reduces steric interactions between substituents.
Furthermore, the non-aromatiC-Nature of the aldehyde substituent allows increased flexibility to reduce any steric constraints. However, the presence of the large aryl substituent on the C-2 sp3 carbon limits its ability to assume a puckered state (described as an increase in the PCCO dihedral angle) as it approaches the phosphine phenyl substituents. This is particularly relevant in the (Z)-isomer, where puckering acts as a tool to reduce unfavorable interactions between the aldehyde and both the phosphine and ylide substituents and thus reduce the energy of the transition state. Therefore, the restricted puckering of the (Z)-TS1 may explain its higher energy in our calculations and the preference for the formation of the E quinoline product.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

Melting points were determined on a B-545 melting point apparatus (Büchi, Porto, Portugal) and are uncorrected. 1H and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on Avance III 300, Avance III HD 500, and Avance III HD 700 [300.13 MHz (1H), 75.47 MHz (13C); 500.13 MHz (1H), 125.76 MHz (13C); 700.13 MHz (1H), 176,05 MHz (13C)] spectrometers (Bruker, Wissembourg, France) with TMS as internal reference and with CDCl3 or DMSOd6 as solvent. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in parts per million values and coupling constants (J) in Hertz. Unequivocal 1H assignments were made using 2D NOESY experiments (mixing time of 800 ms), while 13C assignments were made based on 2D gHSQC (1H/13C) and gHMBC (delays for one bond and long-range JC/H couplings were optimized for 145 and 7 Hz, respectively) experiments. Positive-ion ESI mass spectra were acquired using a Q-TOF2 instrument (Bruker, Wissembourg, France). Nitrogen was used as nebulizer gas and argon as collision gas. The needle voltage was set at 3000 V, with the ion source at 80 °C and desolvation temperature at 150 °C. Cone voltage was 35 V. High resolution mass spectra (HRMS-ESI+) were measure in a microTOF (focus) mass spectrometer. Ions were generated using an Apollo ll (ESI) source (Bruker, Wissembourg, France). Ionization was achieved by electrospray, using a voltage of 4500 V applied to the needle and a counter voltage between 100 and 150 V applied to the capillary. Elemental analyses were obtained with a 932 CHNS analyser (LECO, Madrid, Spain). Preparative thin layer chromatography was carried out with Silica gel 60 GF254 (Merck KGaA, Porto, Portugal) and column chromatography using Silica gel 0.060–0.020 mm 60A (Acros Organics, Porto, Portugal). All other chemicals and solvents were obtained from commercial sources and used as received or dried using standard procedures.

3.2. General Procedure for the Vilsmeyer-Haack Formylation of Flavanones 1ac and 2-aryl-2,3-dihydroquinolin-4(1H)-one 1df

A mixture of POCl3 (0.1 mL, 1 mmol) in dry DMF (2 mL) was stirred under 0 °C during 15 min. After that period, a solution of the appropriate 2-aryl-2,3-dihydroquinolin-4(1H)one 1df (0.1 mmol in 10 mL CH2Cl2) or the appropriate flavanone 1ac (21 mg, 0.1 mmol) was added and the reaction was stirred at ~60 °C for 1.5 h to 2 h (in the case of 2-aryl-2,3-dihydroquinolin-4(1H)one 1df) or 10 to 12 h (flavanone 1ac), depending on the starting material consumption. Then it was poured into a mixture of ice/water (10 g/15 mL) and the pH value was adjusted to 5 using a saturated solution of NaHCO3. The solid obtained was filtered, dissolved in dichloromethane (25 mL) and the organic phase was washed with water (3 × 25 mL). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and evaporated. The residue was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography using appropriate mixtures of eluent, CH2Cl2/hexane.
4-Chloro-2-phenyl-2H-chromene-3-carbaldehyde (2a). Yellow solid, yield (η) 95%, m. p. 101–103 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.40 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.89 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.3 and 8.1 Hz); 7.03 (ddd, 1H, H-6, J 1.3, 7.1 and 8.1 Hz); 7.25-7.31 (m, 5H, H-2′,3′,4′,5′,6′); 7.35 (ddd, 1H, H-7, J 1.3, 7.1 and 8.1 Hz); 7.72 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.3 and 8.1 Hz); 10.30 (s, 1H, 3-CHO) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 75.0 (C-2); 117.4 (C-8); 120.0 (C-4a); 122.0 (C-6); 126.6 (C-5); 126.8 (C-2′,6′); 128.5 (C-3′,5′); 128.8 (C-4′); 134.5 (C-7); 138.1 (C-1′), 143.9 (C-4); 155.1 (C-8a); 188.2 (3-CHO) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 271.1 35Cl [M + H]+ (36); 273.1 37Cl [M + H]+ (24); 293.1 35Cl [M + Na]+ (70); 295.1 37Cl [M + Na]+ (6). EI-HRMS: calcd for (C16H11O235Cl) 270.0448; found 270.0441. Calcd for (C16H11O237Cl) 272.0418; found 272.0409.
4-Chloro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2H-chromene-3-carbaldehyde (2b). Yellow solid, η 77%, m. p. 78–80 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.74 (s, 3H, 4′-OCH3); 6.33 (s,1H, H-2); 6.79 (d large, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 9.2 Hz); 6,85 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 7.02 (ddd, 1H, H-6, J 1.3, 7.1 and 8.0 Hz); 7.22 (dlarge, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 9.2 Hz); 7.33 (ddd, 1H, H-7, J 1.3, 7.1 and 8.0 Hz); 7.73 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 10.27 (s, 1H, 3-CHO) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 55.2 (4′-OCH3); 74.9 (C-2); 113.9 (C-3′,5′); 117.5 (C-8); 120.0 (C-4a); 121.9 (C-6); 126.4 (C-5); 126.9 (C-3); 128.3 (C-2′,6′); 130.1 (C-1′); 134.4 (C-7); 143.6 (C-4′); 143.9 (C-4); 155.0 (C-8a); 188.1 (3-CHO) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 301.1 35Cl [M + H]+ (5); 303.1 37Cl [M + H]+ (100); 323.1 35Cl [M + Na]+ (40); 325.1 37Cl [M + Na]+ (2). EI+-HRMS: calcd for (C17H13O335Cl) 300.0553, found 300.0563. Calcd. for (C17H13O337Cl) 302.0524, found 302.0527.
4-Chloro-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-chromene-3-carbaldehyde (2c). Yellow solid, η 66%, m. p. 187–188 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.47 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.97 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.3 and 8.1 Hz); 7.08 (ddd, 1H, H-6, J 1.3, 7.1 and 8.1 Hz); 7.42 (ddd, 1H, H-7, J 1.3, 7.1 and 8.1 Hz); 7.47 (dlargo, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 9.0 Hz); 7.74 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.3 and 8.1 Hz); 8.13 (dlargo, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 9.0 Hz); 10.32 (s, 1H, 3-CHO) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 73.8 (C-2); 117.4 (C-8); 119.0 (C-4a); 122.7 (C-6); 123.8 (C-3′,5′); 126.0 (C-3); 126.9 (C-5); 127.6 (C-2′,6′), 135.1 (C-7); 144.5 (C-4); 145.6 (C-1′); 147.2 (C-4′); 154.6 (C-8a); 188.1 (3-CHO) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 316.1 35Cl [M + H]+ (100); 318.1 37Cl [M + H]+ (40); 338.1 35Cl [M + Na]+ (29); 340.1 37Cl [M + Na]+ (3). EI+-HRMS: calcd for (C16H10NO435Cl) 315.0298, found 315.0304. Calcd for (C16H10NO437Cl) 317.0269, found 317.0278.
4-Chloro-2-phenyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline-1,3-dicarbaldehyde (2d). Yellow oil, η 60%. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.94 (s, 1H, H-2); 7.09-7.20 (m, 6H, H-2′,3′,4′,5′,6′,8); 7.36 (t, 1H, H-6, J 7.6 Hz); 7.49 (t, 1H, H-7, J 7.6 Hz); 8.00 (d, 1H, H-5, J 7.8 Hz); 8.70 (s, 1H, NCHO); 10.32 (s, 1H, 3-CHO) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 50.6 (C-2); 118.4 (C-8); 126.0 (C-6); 127.1 (C-3′,4′); 127.7 (C-5); 128.5 (C-4′); 128.7 (C-2′,6′); 131.0 (C-3); 133.2 (C-1′); 133.4 (C-7); 136.8 (C-4a); 137.2 (C-8a); 142.9 (C-4); 160.6 (1-NCHO); 187.8 (3-CHO) ppm. MS (ESI+) m/z (%): 320.0 35Cl [M + Na]+ (100); 322.0 37Cl [M + Na]+ (3).
4-Chloro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,2-dihydroquinoline-1,3-dicarbaldehyde (2e). Yellow oil, η 70%. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 3.71(s, 3H, 4′-OCH3); 6.72 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.6 Hz); 6.88 (s, 1H, H-2); 7.12 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.6 Hz); 7.11-7.15 (m, 1H, H-8); 7.36 (t, 1H, H-6, J 7.7 Hz); 7.48 (t, 1H, H-7, J 7.7 Hz); 8.00 (d, 1H, H-5, J 7.8 Hz); 8.69 (s, 1H, NCHO); 10.30 (s, 1H, CHO) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 50.2 (C-2); 55.2 (4′-OCH3); 114.0 (C-3′,5′); 118.4 (C-8); 126.0 (C-6); 127.4 (C-4a); 127.6 (C-5); 128.5 (C-2′,6′); 129.5 (C-1′); 131.7 (C-3); 133.4 (C-7); 136.7 (C-8a); 142.8 (C-4); 159.6 (C-4′); 160.5 (1-NCHO); 187.8 (3-CHO) ppm. MS (ESI+) m/z (%): 350.1 35Cl [M + Na]+ (100); 352,1 37Cl [M + Na]+ (40).
4-Chloro-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-1,2-dihydroquinoline-1,3-dicarbaldehyde (2f). Orange solid, η 40%, m.p. 151–153 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 7.00 (s, 1H, H-2); 7.19 (d, 1H, H-8, J 7.9 Hz); 7.37 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.8 Hz); 7.42 (t, 1H, H-6, J 7.6 Hz); 7.54 (t, 1H, H-7, J 7.6 Hz); 8.03 (d, 1H, H-5, J 7.9 Hz); 8.07 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.8 Hz); 8.72 (s, 1H, 1-NCHO); 10.33 (s, 1H, 3-CHO) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 50.5 (C-2); 118.4 (C-8); 123.8 (C-4a); 124.0 (C-3′,5′); 126.5 (C-6); 128.0 (C-5); 128.1 (C-2′,6′); 130.0 (C-3); 134.0 (C-7); 136.3 (C-8a); 144.0 (C-4); 144.1 (C-1′); 147.8 (C-4′); 160.6 (1-NCHO); 187.6 (3-CHO) ppm. MS (ESI+) m/z (%): 343.1 35Cl [M + H]+ (15); 345.1 37Cl [M + H]+ (2); 381.3 35Cl [M + K]+ (100); 383,0 37Cl [M + K]+ (15). EI-HRMS: calcd. for (C17H11N2O435Cl) 342.0407; found 342.0415. Calcd for (C17H11N2O437Cl) 344.0378; found 344.0391.

3.3. General Procedures for the Synthesis of the Chromene-Indole Hybrids 4ac

An excess of indole 3 (94 mg, 0.80 mmol) was added to a round bottom flask along with the appropriate 2-aryl-4-chloro-2H-chromene-3-carbaldehyde 2ac (0.26 mmol) and dissolved in DMSO (2.5 mL). The mixture was stirred and heated to 130 °C during 24 h. At the end, the reaction mixture was poured into a mixture of ice/water (10 g/20 mL) and liquid-liquid extraction was performed with dichloromethane (3 × 30 mL). The organic layer dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, solvent evaporated and the residue purified by thin layer chromatography using CH2Cl2 as eluent.
3,3′-[(4-Chloro-2-phenyl-2H-chromen-3-yl)methylene]bis(1H-indole) (4a). Yellow solid, η 79%, m.p. 106-107 °C. 1H-NMR (500.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 5.94 (s, 1H, H-2″); 6.25 (s, 1H, 3″-CHCroInd); 6.41 (d, 1H, H-2, J 2.0 Hz); 6.65–6.69 (m, 3H, H-8″, 3″′, 5″′); 6.73–6.80 (m, 3H, H-2″′, 4″′, 6″′); 6.92–7.03 (m, 5H, H-6″, 5, 6, 7, 5′); 7.89 (dt, 1H, H-7″, J 1.6 and 7.8 Hz); 7.17 (dt, 1H, H-6′, J 1.0 and 7.9 Hz); 7.25–7.29 (m, 1H, H-4′); 7.37 (d, 1H, H-7′, J 7.9 Hz); 7.50 (d, 1H, H-2′, J 1.5 Hz); 7.53–7.56 (m, 1H, H-4); 7.64 (dd, 1H, H-5″, J 1.6 and 7.8 Hz); 10.32 (d, 1H, H-1); 11.10 (large s, 1H, H-1′) ppm. 13C-NMR (125.77 MHz; CDCl3): δ 36.2 (3″-CHCroInd); 79.0 (C-2″); 110.6 (C-7); 111.2 (C-7′); 114.0 (C-3); 115.7 (C-3′); 116.7 (C-8″); 119.2 (2C, C-5, 5′); 119.3 (C-4); 120.6 (C-4′); 121.5 (C-6); 121.8 (C-6″); 122.2 (C-6′); 122.8 (C-2′); 123.1 (C-4″a); 123.7 (C-2); 124.8 (C-5″); 125.0 (C-4″); 126.9 (C-3′a); 127.2 (C-3″′, 5″′, 3a); 127.4 (C-2″′, 6″′); 127.6 (C-4″′); 130.0 (C-7″); 132.1 (C-3″); 135.9 (C-7a); 136.6 (C-1″′); 136.9 (C-7′a); 152.4 (C-8″a) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 509.2 35Cl [M + Na]+ (100); 511.2 37Cl [M + Na]+ (25). EI-HRMS: calcd. for (C32H23N2O35Cl) 486.1499; found 486.1490. Calcd for (C32H23N2O37Cl) 488.1470; found 488.1465.
3,3′-[(4-chloro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2H-chromen-3-yl)methylene]bis(1H-indole) (4b). red solid, η 84%, m.p. 119–121 °C. 1H-NMR (500.13 MHz, DMSO-D6): δ 3.50 (s, 3H, 4″′-OCH3); 6.01 (s, 1H, H-2″); 6.15 (s, 1H, 3″-CHCroInd); 6.30 (d, 2H, H-3″′, 5″′, J 8.6 Hz); 6.65 (d, 1H, H-2, J 2.0 Hz); 6.65–6.67 (m, 1H, H-8″); 6.71 (d, 2H, H-2″′, 6″′, J 8.6 Hz); 6.87 (t, 1H, H-5′, J 7.5 Hz); 6.89–7.01 (m, 3H, H- 6″, 5, 6); 7.04–7.10 (m, 2H, H-7, 6′); 7.13 (dt, 1H, H- 7″, J 1.0 and 7.7 Hz); 7.24 (d, 1H, H-4′, J 8.0 Hz); 7.35 (d, 1H, H-2′, J 1.5 Hz); 7.41 (d, 1H, H-7′, J 8.1 Hz); 7.45 (d, 1H, H-4, J 8.1 Hz); 7.54 (dd, 1H, H-5″, J 1.0 and 7.7 Hz); 10.57 (d, 1H, H-1, J 2.0 Hz); 11.06 (d, 1H, H-1′, J 1.5 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (125.77 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 35.6 (3″-CHCroInd); 54.8 (4″′-OCH3); 77.5 (C-2″); 111.1 (C-7); 111.6 (C-7′); 112.0 (C-3) 112.5 (C-3″′, 5″′); 114.3 (C- 3′); 116.5 (C-8″); 118.2 (C-4′); 118.2 (C-5); 118.4 (C-5′); 119.0 (C-4); 120.7 (C-6); 121.2 (C-6′); 121.6 (C-6″); 122.6 (C-4″); 122.7 (C-4″a); 123.2 (C-2′); 124.3 (C-5″, 2); 126.5 (C-3′a); 127.0 (C-3a); 128.6 (C-2″′, 6″′); 128.8 (C-1″′); 130.1 (C-7″); 133.6 (C-3″); 135.8 (C-7a); 136.6 (C-7′a); 151.8 (C-8″a); 158.6 (C-4″′) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 539.2 35Cl [M + Na]+ (29); 541.2 37Cl [M + Na]+ (12). EI-HRMS: calcd. for (C33H25N2O235Cl) 516.1605; found 516.1610. Calcd for (C33H25N2O237Cl) 518.1575; found 518.1577.
3,3′-[(4-Chloro-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-chromen-3-yl)methylene]bis(1H-indole) (4c). Yellow solid, η 60%, m.p. 179–180 °C. 1H-NMR (500.13 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 6.14 (s, 1H, 3″-CHCroInd); 6.26 (s, 1H, H-2″); 6.69 (dd, 1H, H- 8″, J 0.8 and 8.0 Hz); 6.75 (d, 1H, H-2, J 2.1 Hz); 6.82–6.94 (m, 6H, H-2″′, 6″′, 5, 6, 7, 5′); 7.03–7.11 (m, 2H, H-6″, 6′); 7.17 (dt, 1H, H-7″, J 1.6 and 8.0 Hz); 7.27 (d, 1H, H-4′, J 8.0 Hz); 7.34 (d, 1H, H-4, J 7.4 Hz); 7.41–7.46 (m, 3H, H-3″′, 5″′, 7′); 7.56 (d, 1H, H-2′, J 1.6 Hz); 7.62 (dd, 1H, H-5″, J 1.6 and 7.8 Hz); 10.61 (d, 1H, H-1, J 2.1 Hz); 11.16 (d, 1H, H-1′, J 1.6 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (125.77 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 35.7 (3″-CHCroInd); 77.1 (C-2″); 111.4 (C-7); 112.1 (C-3); 112.1 (C-7′); 113.8 (C-3′); 116.9 (C-8″); 118.6 (C-4); 118.9 (C-5, 5′); 119.6 (C-4′); 121.3 (C-6); 121.7 (C-6′); 122.2 (C-3″′, 5″′); 122.4 (C-6″); 122.6 (C-4″a); 123.3 (C-2′); 123.8 (C-4″); 125.0 (C-5″); 125.2 (C-2); 126.9 (C-3′a); 127.1 (C-3a); 128.3 (C-2″′, 6″′); 131.0 (C-7″); 133.5 (C-3″); 136.2 (C-7a); 137.0 (C-7′a); 143.2 (C-1″′); 146.4 (C-4″′); 151.7 (C-8″a) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 554.2 35Cl [M + Na]+ (8); 556.2 37Cl [M + Na]+ (3). EI-HRMS: calcd. for (C32H22N3O335Cl) 531.1350; found 531.1354. Calcd for (C32H22N3O337Cl) 533.1320; found 533.1327.

3.4. General Procedures for the Synthesis of 6-Aryl-6H-chromeno[3,4-c]quinolines 7af

In a round bottom flask with solution of the appropriate 2-aryl-4-chloro-2H-chromene-3-carbaldehyde 2ac (0.10 mmol) in dichloromethane (7 mL) was added the correspondent aniline 5 (0.27 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1.5 or 2.5 h depending on the substituents in the 2-aryl-4-chloro-2H-chromene-3-carbaldehydes 2ac. After this period, TFA (2.6 mmol in case of 3,4-dimethoxyanilinine and 26 mmol in case of aniline or 4-nitroaniline) was added to the reaction mixture and left stirring at room temperature for 72 h. Finally, the solvent was evaporated on the rotary evaporator and the mixture was purified by preparative chromatography using CH2Cl2 or a mixture of CH2Cl2/hexane (3:1) as eluent.
1-[4-Chloro-2-phenyl-2H-chromen-3-yl)]-N-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)methanimine (6b). Yellow solid, η 17%, m.p. 79–81 °C. 1H-NMR (500.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.90 and 3.91 (s, 3H, 3″- and 4″-OCH3); 6.79 (s, 1H, H-2), 6.81 (dd, 1H, H-6″, J 2.3 and 6.0 Hz); 6.83 (d, 1H, H- 2″, J 2.3 Hz); 6.86 (d, 1H, H-5″, J 6.0 Hz); 6.90 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.1 and 8.1 Hz); 6.99 (dt, 1H, H-6, J 1.0 and 7.8 Hz); 7.41 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.8 Hz); 7.21–7.28 (m, 4H, H-7,3′,4′,5′); 7.63 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.5 and 7.8 Hz); 8.84 (s, 1H, CHN) ppm. 13C-NMR (125.77 MHz, CDCl3): δ 56.0 and 56.1 (3″- and 4″-OCH3); 76.0 (C-2); 105.7 (C-6″); 111.2 (C-5″); 112.9 (C-2″); 117.2 (C-8); 121.5 (C- 4a); 121.7 (C-6); 125.6 (C-5); 127.3 (C-2′,6′); 127.9 (C-3); 128.3 (C-3′,4′,5′); 132.2 (C-7); 134.8 (C-4); 138.8 (C-1′); 144.7 (C-1″); 148.4 (C-4″); 149.3 (C-3″); 153.0 (CHN); 154.2 (C-8a) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 406.1 35Cl [M + H]+ (100); 408.1 37Cl [M + H]+ (52).
1-[4-Chloro-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-chromen-3-yl)]-N-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)methanimine (6f). Yellow solid, η 9%, m.p. 109–112 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.91 and 3.92 (s, 3H, 3″- and 4″-OCH3); 6.81 (t, 1H, H-2″, J 2.0 Hz); 6.84–6.87 (m, 3H, H-2,6″,5″); 6.95 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.1 and 7.9 Hz); 7.03 (dt, 1H, H-6, J 1.1 and 7.9 Hz); 7.30 (dt, 1H, H-7, J 1.6 and 7.9 Hz); 7.59 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.8 Hz); 7.64 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.6 and 7.9 Hz); 8.11 (d, 1H, H-3′,5′, J 8.8 Hz); 8.87 (s, 1H, CHN) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz, CDCl3): δ 56.0 and 56.1 (3″- and 4″-OCH3); 75.0 (C-2); 105.5 (C-6″); 111.3 (C-5″); 113.2 (C-2″); 117.1 (C-8); 121.1 (C- 4a); 122.3 (C-6); 123.5 (C-3′,5′); 125.9 (C-5); 127.1 (C-3); 128.1 (C-2′,6′); 132.7 (C- 7); 135.4 (C-4); 144.1 (C-1″); 146.1 (C-1′); 147.7 (C-4′); 148.8 (C-3″); 149.5 (C-4″); 152.5 (CHN); 153.7 (C-8a) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 451.1 35Cl [M + H]+ (100); 453.1 37Cl [M + H]+ (30).
6-Phenyl-6H-chromeno[3,4-c]quinoline (7a). Yellow oil, η 40%. 1H-NMR (500,13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.37 (s, 1H, H-6); 7.05 (dd, 1H, H-4, J 1.3 and 7.9 Hz); 7.18 (dt, 1H, H-2, J 1.3 and 7.5 Hz); 7.39 (dt, 1H, H-3, J 1.3 and 7.5 Hz); 7.41–7.50 (m, 7H, H-7,11, 2′,3′,4′,5′,6′); 7.66 (d, 1H, H-12, J 8.3 Hz); 7.70 (dt, 1H, H-10, J 1.4 and 7.0 Hz); 8.15 (d, 1H, H-9, J 8.3 Hz); 8.50 (dd, 1H, H-1, J 1.3 and 7.9 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (500,13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 80.3 (C-6); 117.7 (C-4); 122.6 (C-2); 123.2 (C-12c); 125.6 (C-1); 126.3 (C-11); 126.5 (C-6a); 127.5 (C-12a); 127.8 (C-12); 128.2 (C-2′,6′); 128.8 (C-3′,5′); 129.0 (C-4′); 129.3 (C-9); 129.8 (C-10); 132.0 (C-3); 132.9 (C-7); 138.6 (C-1′); 148.1 (C-8a); 148.9 (C-12b); 156.6 (C-4a) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%):310.2 [M + H]+ (42).
10,11-Dimethoxy-3-phenyl-3H-chromene[3,4-c]quinoline (7b). Yellow solid, η 63%, m.p. 127–128 °C. 1H-NMR (500.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.95 (s, 3H, 11-OCH3); 4.07 (s, 3H, 10-OCH3); 6.34 (s, 1H, H-6); 6.91 (s, 1H, H-12); 7.04 (dd, 1H, H-4, J 1.0 and 8.1 Hz); 7.16 (dt, 1H, H-2, J 1.0 and 7.6 Hz); 7.30 (s, 1H, H-7); 7.35 (ddd, 1H, H-3, J 1.6; 7.6 and 8.1 Hz); 7.40–7.52 (m, 6H, H-9,2′,3′,4′,5′,6′); 8.45 (dd, 1H, H-1, J 1.6 and 7.6 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (125.77 MHz, CDCl3): δ 56.0 (11-OCH3); 56.2 (10-OCH3); 80.4 (C-6); 105.0 (C-12a); 105.3 (C-12); 107.9 (C-9); 117.6 (C-4); 122.5 (C-2); 123.1 (C-12c); 125.0 (C-1); 126.7 (C-6a); 128.3 (C-2′,6′); 128.8 (C-3′,5′); 128.9 (C-4′); 131.2 (C-3); 131.4 (C-7); 139.0 (C-1′); 145.1 (C-8a); 146.8 (C-12b); 149.7 (C-11); 152.7 (C-10); 156.1 (C-4a) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 370.1 [M + H]+ (100). EI-HRMS: calcd. for (C24H19NO3) 369.1365; found 369.1368.
10-Nitro-3-phenyl-3H-chromeno[3,4-c]quinoline (7c). Orange oil, η 25%. 1H-NMR (500,13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.38 (s, 1H, H-6); 7.09 (d, 1H, H-4, J 8.0 Hz); 7.20–7.26 (m, 1H, H-2); 7.44–7.49 (m, 6H, H-3, 2′,3′,4′,5′,6′), 7.60 (s, 1H, H-7); 8.26 (d, 1H, H-9, J 9.1 Hz); 8.45 (dd, 1H, H-10, J 2.4 and 9.1 Hz); 8.55 (d, 1H, H-1, J 7.5 Hz); 8.62 (d, 1H, H-12, J 2.4 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (500,13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 80.2 (C-6); 118.0 (C-4); 122.2 (C-12a); 122.6 (C-2); 123.1 (C-10); 123.5 (C-6a); 124.6 (C-12); 126.4 (C-1); 128.2 (C-2′,6′); 128.6 (C-12c); 129.1 (C-3′,5′); 129.4 (C-4′); 130.8 (C-9); 133.5 (C-3); 134.5 (C-7); 137.8 (C-1′); 145.1 (C-11); 150.2 (C-8a); 152.4 (C-12b); 157.2 (C-4a) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%):355.2 [M + H]+ (100).
3-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3H-chromeno[3,4-c]quinoline (7d). Yellow oil, η 50%. 1H-NMR (500,13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.84 (s, 3H, 4′-OCH3); 6.32 (s, 1H, H-6); 6.96 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.8 Hz); 7.03 (d, 1H, H-4, J 9.2 Hz); 7.17 (t, 1H, H-2, J 7.5 Hz); 7.33–7.50 (m, 5H, H-3, 7, 11, 2′,6′); 7.65 (d, 1H, H-12, J 7.8 Hz); 7.69 (t, 1H, H-10, J 7.7 Hz); 8.14 (d, 1H, H-9, J 7.8 Hz); 8.52 (d, 1H, H-1, J 9.2 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (500,13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 55.4 (4′-OCH3); 80.0 (C-6); 114.2 (C-3′,5′); 117.7 (C-4); 122.5 (C-2); 123.5 (C-12c); 125.5 (C-1); 126.2 (C-11); 127.6 (C-12); 127,7 (C-12a); 128.8 (C-12); 129.3 (C-10); 129.7 (C-2′,6′); 129.7 (C-1′); 130.8 (C-1′); 132.0 (C-3); 132.9 (C-7); 148.1 (C-8a); 149.0 (C-12b); 156.5 (C-4a); 160.0 (C-4′) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 340.2 [M + H]+ (100).
10,11-Dimethoxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3H-chromene[3,4-c]quinoline (7e). Yellow solid, η 75%, m.p. 107–108 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 3.82 (s, 3H, 4′-OCH3); 3.93 (s, 3H, 11-OCH3); 4.02 (s, 3H, 10-OCH3); 6.42 (s, 1H, H-6); 6.94–7.02 (m, 3H, H-4,3′,5′); 7.14 (dt, 1H, H-2, J 1.1 and 7.7 Hz); 7.20 (s, 1H, H-12); 7.32–7.43 (m, 3H, H-3,2′,6′); 7.44 (s, 1H, H-9); 7.53 (s, 1H, H-7); 8.44 (dd, 1H, H-1, J 1.6 and 7.7 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz, acetone-d6): δ 55.5 (4′-OCH3); 56.1 (10- and 11-OCH3); 80.2 (C-6); 106.4 (C-9); 108.5 (C-12); 114.7 (C-3′,5′); 118.3 (C-4); 122.8 (C-2); 124.1 (C-12a); 124.5 (C-12c); 125.6 (C-1); 127.3 (C-6a); 130.3 (C- 2′,6′); 131.9 (C-3,7); 132.5 (C-1′); 145.9 (C-8a); 146.8 (C-12b); 151.0 (C-11); 154.0 (C-10); 156.9 (C-4a); 160.8 (C-4′) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 400.1 [M + H]+ (100). EI-HRMS: calcd. for (C25H21NO4) 399.1471; found 399.1475.
10,11-Dimethoxy-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-3H-chromene[3,4-c]quinoline (7f). Yellow solid, η 73%, m.p. 149–150 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.97 (s, 3H, 10-OCH3); 4.07 (s, 3H, 11-OCH3); 6.44 (s, 1H, H-6); 6.93 (s, 1H, H-9); 7.04 (dd, 1H, H-4, J 1.0 and 7.8 Hz); 7.18 (dt, 1H, H-2, J 1.0 and 7.8 Hz); 7.32 (s, 1H, H-7); 7.37 (dt, 1H, H-3, J 1.6 and 7.8 Hz); 7.50 (s, 1H, H-12); 7.65 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.8 Hz); 8.28 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.8 Hz); 8.44 (dd, 1H, H-1, J 1.6 and 7.8 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz, CDCl3): δ 56.1 (10- OCH3); 56.3 (11-OCH3); 78.9 (C-6); 105.2 (C-9); 107.9 (C-12); 117.6 (C-4); 123.0 (C-12a); 123.0 (C-2); 123.3 (C-12c); 123.9 (C-3′,5′); 125.0 (C-6a); 125.1 (C-1); 128.9 (C-2′,6′); 131.0 (C-7); 131.6 (C-3); 145.4 (C-8a); 146.1 (C-1′); 146.2 (C-12b); 148.1 (C-4′); 150.0 (C- 10); 153.0 (C-11); 155.3 (C-4a) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%):415.1 [M + H]+ (100). EI-HRMS: calcd. for (C24H18N2O5) 414.1216; found 414.1219.

3.5. General Procedures for the Synthesis of the (Z)-and (E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styryl-2H-chromenes 10ai/11ai

A mixture of appropriate phosphonium halide (8ac, 77 mg, 0.21 mmol) in freshly dry THF (10 mL) and NaH (13 mg, 0.5 mmol) was stirred under reflux until formation of the corresponding ylide, then, the 4-chloro-2-phenyl-2H-chromene-3-carbaldehydes 2ac (0.07 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture continued in reflux (or room temperature). At the end, the reaction mixture was poured into a mixture of ice (10 g) and water (20 mL) and acidified at pH ~3 with a solution HCl (10%). Then, extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL), the organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate, the solvent was evaporated to dryness and the solid residue was purified by thin layer chromatography using as eluent a mixtures dichloromethane/hexane.
(Z)-4-Chloro-2-phenyl-3-styryl-2H-chromene (10a). White solid, η 32%, m. p. 112–113 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 5.89 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.37 (d, 1H, H-α, J 12.3 Hz); 6.64 (d, 1H, H-β, J 12.3 Hz); 6.76 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 6.95 (ddd, 1H, H-6, J 1.3, 7.1 and 8.0 Hz); 7.14–7.22 (m, 6H, H-2′,3′,4′,5′,6′,7); 7.31–7.43 (m, 5H, H-2″,3″, 4″,5″,6″); 7.55 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 78.2 (C-2); 116.4 (C-8); 121.3 (C-4a); 121.4 (C-6); 124.5 (C-β); 124.6 (C-5); 126.8 (C-4); 127.2 (C-2′,6′); 128.1 (C-4′); 128.3 (C-3′,5′); 128.4 (C-4″); 128.5 (C-2″,6″); 128.6 (C-3″,5″); 128.7 (C-1′); 129.1 (C-3); 130.4 (C-7); 133.3 (C-α); 136.7 (C-1″); 152.7 (C-8a) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 367.1 Cl35 [M + Na]+ (45), 369.1 Cl37 [M + Na]+ (15). EI-HRMS m/z calcd for (C23H1735ClO) 344.0968, found 344.0964. Calcd for (C23H1737ClO) 346.0938, found 346.0933.
(E)-4-Chloro-2-phenyl-3-styryl-2H-chromene (11a). White solid, η 25%, m. p. 121–123 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.33 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.49 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.5 Hz); 6.79 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 6.94 (ddd, 1H, H-6, J 1.3, 7.1 and 8.0 Hz); 7.13 (ddd, 1H, H-7, J 1.3, 7.1 and 8.0 Hz); 7.25–7.34 (m, 6H, H-2″,3″,4″,5″,6″,4′); 7.39–7.45 (m, 4H, H-2′,3′,5′,6′); 7.56 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.5 Hz); 7.57 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 77.4 (C-2); 116.7 (C-8); 121.7 (C-6); 122.2 (C-4a); 123.2 (C-α); 125.0 (C-5); 126.8 (C-2″,6″); 127.2 (C-4); 127.7 (C-2′,6′); 128.3 (C-4′); 128.5 (C-3″,5″); 128.7 (C-3′,5′); 130.4 (C-7); 131.8 (C-β); 136.7 (C-3); 137.7 (C-1′); 152.2 (C-8a) ppm.
(Z)-4-Chloro-3-(4-ethoxyvinyl)-2-phenyl-2H-chromene (10b). White solid, η 45%, m. p. 100–102 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 1.42 (t, 3H, 4″-OCH2CH3, J 7.0 Hz); 4.05 (qd, 2H, 4′-OCH2CH3, J 1.7 and 7.0 Hz); 5.95 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.24 (d, 1H, H-α, J 12.2 Hz); 6.58 (d, 1H, H-β, J 12.2 Hz); 6.77 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.1 and 7.8 Hz); 6.87 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 9.0 Hz); 6.95 (dt, 1H, H-6, J 1.1 and 7.6 Hz); 7.15 (dt, 1H, H-7, J 1.1 and 7.6 Hz); 7.19–7.23 (m, 5H, H-2′,3′,4′,5′,6′); 7.37 (d, 2H, H-2″,6″, J 9.0 Hz); 7.54 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.1 and 7.8 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 14.8 (4″-OCH2CH3); 63.4 (4″-OCH2CH3); 78.2 (C-2); 114.4 (C-3″,5″); 116.3 (C-8); 121.4 (C-6); 121.5 (C-4a); 122.7 (C-α); 124.5 (C-5); 126.3 (C-4); 127.2 (C-2′,6′); 128.2 (C-3′,5′); 128.4 (C-4′); 129.1 (C-1′); 129.5 (C-3); 130.1 (C-2″,6″); 130.2 (C-7); 132.9 (C-β); 138.9 (C-1″); 152.6 (C-8a); 158.8 (C-4″) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 411.1 Cl35 [M + Na]+ (100); 413.1 Cl37 [M + Na]+ (3). EI-HRMS m/z calcd for (C25H2135ClO2) 388.1230, found 388.1226. Calcd for (C25H2137ClO2) 390.1201, found 390.1216.
(E)-4-Chloro-3-(4-ethoxyvinyl)-2-phenyl-2H-chromene (11b). Yellow solid, η 25%, m. p. 166–167 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 1.41 (t, 3H, 4″-OCH2CH3, J 7.0 Hz); 4.02 (q, 2H, 4′-OCH2CH3, J 7.0 Hz); 6.31 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.44 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.5 Hz); 6.78 (d largo, 1H, H-8, J 8.0 Hz); 6.85 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 9.1 Hz); 6.94 (dt, 1H, H-6, J 1.4 and 7.7 Hz); 7.11 (dt, 1H, H-7, J 1.4 and 7.7 Hz); 7.26–7.29 (m, 3H, H-3′,4′,5′); 7.37 (d, 2H, H-2″,6″, J 9.1 Hz); 7.39–7.42 (m, 2H, H-2′,6′); 7.42 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.5 Hz); 7.55 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.4 and 8.0 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 14.8 (4″-OCH2CH3); 63.5 (4″-OCH2CH3); 77.1 (C-2); 114.7 (C-3″,5″); 116.6 (C-8); 121.0 (C-α); 121.6 (C-6); 122.4 (C-4a); 124.9 (C-5); 125.8 (C-4); 127.7 (C-3′,5′); 127.8 (C-3); 128.1 (C-2″,6″); 128.4 (C-1″); 128.5 (C-2′,6′); 128.6 (C-4′); 129.4 (C-1′); 130.0 (C-7); 131.5 (C-β); 137.8 (C-3); 152.1 (C-8a); 159.3 (C-4″) ppm.
(Z)-4-Chloro-2-phenyl-3-(4-nitrovinyl)-2H-chromene (10c). Yellow solid, η 41%, m. p. 159–161 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 5.78 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.53 (d, 1H, H-α, J 12.2 Hz); 6.66 (d, 1H, H-β, J 12.2 Hz); 6.79 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.2 and 7.9 Hz); 6.97 (dt, 1H, H-6, J 1.2 and 7.6 Hz); 7.16–7.25 (m, 6H, H-7, 2′,3′,4′,5′,6′); 7.53 (d, 2H, H-2″,6″, J 8.8 Hz); 7.55 (d, 1H, H-5, J 7.9 Hz); 8.17 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 8.8 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 78.5 (C-2); 116.5 (C-8); 121.7 (C-6); 121.9 (C-4a); 123.8 (C-3″,5″); 125.5 (C-5); 127.2 (C-2′,6′); 127.6 (C-4); 128.3 (C-β); 128.5 (C-3′,5′); 128.7 (C-4′); 129.0 (C-1′); 129.2 (C-2″,6″); 130.9 (C-α); 131.0 (C-7); 138.2 (C-3); 143.3 (C-1″); 147.0 (C-4″); 152.4 (C-8a) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 413.3 Cl35 [M + Na]+ (100), 415.3 Cl37 [M + Na]+ (30). Anal. Calcd for C23H16ClNO3: C, 70,86%; H, 4,14%; N, 3,59%. Found: C, 71,19%; H, 4,16%; N, 3,53%.
(E)-4-Chloro-2-phenyl-3-(4-nitrovinyl)-2H-chromene (11c). Yellow solid, η 33%, m. p. 194–196 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.32 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.50 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.5 Hz); 6.80 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 6.97 (ddd, 1H, H-6, J 1.3, 7.2 and 8.0 Hz); 7.18 (ddd, 1H, H-7, J 1.3, 7.2 and 8.0 Hz); 7.28–7.33 (m, 3H, H-3′,4′,5′); 7.39-7.42 (m, 2H, H-2′,6′); 7.56 (d, 2H, H-2″,6″, J 9.0 Hz); 7.60 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 7.71 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.5 Hz); 8.18 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 9.0 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 77.2 (C-2); 116.9 (C-8); 121.7 (C-4a); 121.9 (C-6); 124.1 (C-3″,5″); 125.5 (C-5); 126.4 (C-4); 127.2 (C-2″,6″); 127.3 (C-α); 127.6 (C-2′,6′); 128.7 (C-3′,5′); 128.8 (C-4′); 129.0 (C-β); 129.2 (C-1′); 131.0 (C-7); 137.2 (C-3); 143.1 (C-1″); 146.8 (C-4″); 152.5 (C-8a) ppm.
(Z)-4-Chloro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-vinyl-2H-chromene (10d). Yellow solid, η 50%, m. p. 78–80 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 3.73 (s, 3H, 4′-OCH3); 5.83 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.35 (d, 1H, H-α, J 12.2 Hz); 6.63 (d, 1H, H-β, J 12.2 Hz); 6.72 (dlargo, 1H, H-8, J 8.0 Hz); 6.73 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.9 Hz); 6.95 (dt, 1H, H-6, J 1.2 and 7.6 Hz); 7.06 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.9 Hz); 7.11 (dt, 1H, H-7, J 1.2 and 7.6 Hz); 7.29–7.42 (m, 5H, H-2″,3″,4″,5″,6″); 7.55 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.2 and 8.0 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 55.1 (4′-OCH3); 77.9 (C-2); 113.6 (C-3′,5′); 116.4 (C-8); 121.3 (C-6); 121.4 (C-4a); 124.4 (C-α); 124.5 (C-5); 126.8 (C-4); 128.1 (C-4″); 128.5 (C-3″,5″); 128.6 (C-2″,6″); 128.7 (C-2′,6′); 129.3 (C-3); 130.3 (C-7); 130.8 (C-1′); 133.3 (C-β); 136.7 (C-1″); 152.5 (C-8a); 159.7 (C-4′) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 413.1 Cl35 [M + K]+ (10). EI-HRMS m/z calcd for (C24H1935ClO2) 374.1074; found 374.1082. Calcd for (C24H1937ClO2) 376.1044; found 376.1050.
(E)-4-Chloro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-vinyl-2H-chromene (11d). White solid, η 28%, m. p. 187–189 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 3.73 (s, 3H, 4′-OCH3); 6.28 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.47 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.5 Hz); 6.77 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.4 and 8.3 Hz); 6.80 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.7 Hz); 6.95 (dt, 1H, H-6, J 1.4 and 7.6 Hz); 7.13 (dt, 1H, H-7, J 1.4 and 7.6 Hz); 7.24–7.29 (m, 1H, H-4″); 7.31-7.35 (m, 4H, H-2′,6′,3″,5″); 7.42–7.45 (m, 2H, H-2″,6″); 7.44 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.7 Hz); 7.53 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.5 Hz); 7.58 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.4 and 8.3 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 55.1 (4′-OCH3); 76.9 (C-2); 113.9 (C-3′,5′); 116.7 (C-8); 121.6 (C-6); 122.2 (C-4a); 123.0 (C-α); 125.0 (C-5); 126.8 (C-2″,6″); 127.4 (C-4); 128.3 (C-4″); 128.5 (C-3); 128.7 (C-2′,6′); 129.1 (C-3″,5″); 129.8 (C-1′); 130.3 (C-7); 131.8 (C-β); 136.7 (C-1″); 152.2 (C-8a); 159.8 (C-4′) ppm.
(Z)-4-Chloro-3-(4-ethoxyvinyl)-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2H-chromene (10e). Yellow oil, η 30%. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 1.43 (t, 3H, 4″-OCH2CH3, J 7.0 Hz); 3.73 (s, 1H, 4′-OCH3); 4.05 (q, 2H, 4″-OCH2CH3, J 7.0 Hz); 5.89 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.22 (d, 1H, H-α, J 12.1 Hz); 6.56 (d, 1H, H-β, J 12.1 Hz); 6.72–6.75 (m, 3H, H-8,3′,5′); 6.87 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 8.9 Hz); 6.95 (dt, 1H, H-6, J 1.4 and 7.7 Hz); 7.09 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.9 Hz); 7.14 (dt, 1H, H-7, J 1.4 and 7.7 Hz); 7.36 (d, 2H, H-2″,6″, J 8.9 Hz); 7.55 (dd,1H, H-5, J 1.4 and 8.0 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 14.8 (4″-OCH2CH3); 55.1 (4′-OCH3); 63.4 (4″-OCH2CH3); 77.9 (C-2); 113.6 (C-3′,5′); 114.6 (C-3″,5″); 116.4 (C-8); 121.3 (C-6); 121.4 (C-4a); 122.6 (C-α); 124.4 (C-5); 126.2 (C-4); 128.7 (C-2′,6′); 129.1 (C-1″); 129.7 (C-3); 130.0 (C-2″,6″); 130.2 (C-7); 130.9 (C-1′); 132.9 (C-β); 152.5 (C-8a); 158.8 (C-4″); 159.6 (C-4′) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 441.2 Cl35 [M + Na]+ (10); 443.2 Cl37 [M + Na]+ (10). Anal. Calcd for C26H23ClO3: C, 74.55%; H, 5.53%. Found C, 74.73%; H, 5.55%.
(E)-4-Chloro-3-(4-ethoxyvinyl)-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2H-chromene (11e). Yellow solid, η 20%, m. p. 140–142 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 1.41 (t, 3H, 4″-OCH2CH3, J 7.0 Hz); 3.73 (s, 1H, 4′-OCH3); 4.03 (q, 2H, 4″-OCH2CH3, J 7.0 Hz); 6.26 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.42 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.5 Hz); 6.76 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 6.79 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.8 Hz); 6.84 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 8.8 Hz); 6.93 (dt, 1H, H-6, J 1.3 and 7.6 Hz); 7.11 (dt, 1H, H-7, J 1.3 and 7.6 Hz); 7.32 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.8 Hz); 7.37 (d, 2H, H-2″,6″, J 8.8 Hz); 7.42 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.5 Hz); 7.56 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 14.7 (4″-OCH2CH3); 55.1 (4′-OCH3); 63.5 (4″-OCH2CH3); 76.9 (C-2); 113.8 (C-3′,5′); 114.6 (C-3″,5″); 116.6 (C-8); 120.9 (C-α); 121.5 (C-6); 122.4 (C-4a); 124.8 (C-5); 127.7 (C-4); 128.1 (C-2″,6″); 128.7 (C-3); 129.1 (C-2′,6′); 129.4 (C-1″); 129.9 (C-1′); 130.0 (C-7); 131.4 (C-β); 152.0 (C-8a); 159.2 (C-4″); 159.7 (C-4′) ppm.
(Z)-4-Choro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(4-nitrovinyl)-2H-chromene (10f). Yellow oil, η 53%. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 3.74 (s, 3H, 4-OCH3); 5.72 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.51 (d, 1H, H-α, J 12.3 Hz); 6.64 (d, 1H, H-β, J 12.3 Hz); 6.78 (dlargo, 1H, H-8, J 8.0 Hz); 6.82 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.7 Hz); 6.97 (dt, 1H, H-6, J 1.3 and 7.6 Hz); 7.18 (td, 1H, H-7, J 1.3 and 7.6 Hz); 7.31 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.7 Hz); 7.55 (d, 2H, H-2″,6″, J 8.7 Hz); 7.61 (d, 1H, H-5, J 8.0 Hz); 8.17 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 8.8 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 55.2 (4′-OCH3); 78.2 (C-2); 114.0 (C-3′,5′); 116.9 (C-8); 121.6 (C-4a); 121.8 (C-6); 124.1 (C-3″,5″); 125.4 (C-5); 126.5 (C-4); 127.1 (C-2″,6″); 127.2 (C-4′); 128.2 (C-α); 129.0 (C-2′,6′); 129.2 (C-1′); 129.3 (C-3); 131.0 (C-β); 131.2 (C-7); 143.2 (C-1″); 147.0 (C-4″); 152.4 (C-8a); 160.0 (C-4′) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 442.1 Cl35 [M + Na]+ (20); 444.1 Cl37 [M + Na]+ (10). EI-HRMS m/z calcd for (C24H18N35ClO4) 419.0924, found 419.0932. Calcd for (C24H18N37ClO4) 421.0895, found 421.0895.
(E)-4-Chloro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(4-nitrovinyl)-2H-chromene (11f). Yellow solid, η 35%, m. p. 170–172 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 3.75 (s, 3H, 4′-OCH3); 6.27 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.47 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.6 Hz); 6.78 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 6.82 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.8 Hz); 6.97 (dt, 1H, H-6, J 1.3 and 7.6 Hz); 7.17 (dt, 1H, H-7, J 1.3 and 7.6 Hz); 7.31 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.8 Hz); 7.55 (d, 2H, H-2″,6″, J 8.8 Hz); 7.61 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 7.68 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.6 Hz); 8.17 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 8.8 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 55.2 (4′-OCH3); 76.8 (C-2); 114.0 (C-3′,5′); 116.9 (C-8); 121.6 (C-4a); 121.8 (C-6); 124.1 (C-3″,5″); 125.4 (C-5); 126.4 (C-4); 127.1 (C-2′,6′); 127.2 (C-α); 128.7 (C-3); 128.9 (C-β); 129.0 (C-2″,6″); 129.2 (C-1′); 131.2 (C-7); 143.4 (C-1″); 147.0 (C-4″); 152.4 (C-8a); 160.0 (C-4′) ppm.
(Z)-4-Chloro-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-3-vinyl-2H-chromene (10g). Red oil, η 34%. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 5.30 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.48 (d, 1H, H-α, J 12.2 Hz); 6.72 (d, 1H, H-β, J 12.2 Hz); 6.80 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 6.99 (dt, 1H, H-6, J 1.3 and 7.6 Hz); 7.20 (dt, 1H, H-7, J 1.3 and 7.6 Hz); 7.30 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 9.0 Hz); 7.33-7.39 (m, 5H, H-2″,3″,4″,5″,6″); 7.56 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 8.05 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 9.0 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 77.3 (C-2); 116.2 (C-8); 121.0 (C-4a); 121.9 (C-6); 123.3 (C-3′,5′); 124.0 (C-α); 124.8 (C-5); 126.7 (C-3); 127.7 (C-4); 127.8 (C-2′,6′); 128.3 (C-4″); 128.4 (C-3″,5″); 128.5 (C-2″,6″); 130.7 (C-7); 133.7 (C-β); 136.3 (C-1″); 145.8 (C-4′); 147.5 (C-1′); 152.1 (C-8a) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 412.1 Cl35 [M + Na]+ (15); 414.3 Cl37 [M + Na]+ (10). EI-HRMS m/z calcd for (C23H16N35ClO3) 389.0819, found 389.0817. Calcd for (C23H16N37ClO3) 391.0789; found 391.0804.
(E)-4-Chloro-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-3-vinyl-2H-chromene (11g). Orange oil, η 15%. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.38 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.48 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.5 Hz); 6.84 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.2 and 8.1 Hz); 6.99 (ddd, 1H, H-6, J 1.2, 7.0 and 8.1 Hz); 7.17 (ddd, 1H, H-7, J 1.2, 7.0 and 8.1 Hz); 7.28–7.37 (m, 5H, H-2″,3″,4″,5″,6″); 7.57 (dlargo, 1H, H-5, J 8.1 Hz); 7.60 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 9.0 Hz); 7.61 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.5 Hz); 8.14 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 9.0 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75,47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 75.6 (C-2); 116.7 (C-8); 122.0 (C-4a); 122.3 (C-6); 123.0 (C-α); 123.8 (C-2′,6′); 125.4 (C-5); 126.3 (C-4); 126.9 (C-2″6″); 127.7 (C-1″); 128.7 (C-3′,5′); 128.8 (C-4″); 128.9 (C-3″,5″); 130.8 (C-7); 132.0 (C-β); 136.3 (C-3); 144.9 (C-1′); 148.0 (C-4′); 151.8 (C-8a) ppm.
(Z)-4-Chloro-3-(4-ethoxyvinyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-chromene (10h). Yellow oil, η 45%. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 1.43 (t, 3H, 4″-OCH2CH3, J 7.0 Hz); 4.06 (q, 2H, 4″-OCH2CH3, J 7.0 Hz); 6.03 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.34 (d, 1H, H-α, J 12.1 Hz); 6.65 (d, 1H, H-β, J 12.1 Hz); 6.82 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 6.87 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 9.0 Hz); 6.99 (dt, 1H, H-6, J 1.3 and 7.6 Hz); 7.20 (dt, 1H, H-7, J 1.3 and 7.6 Hz); 7.34 (d, 4H, H-2′,6′,2″,6″, J 9.0 Hz); 7.55 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 8.05 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 9.0 Hz) ppm 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 14.8 (4″-OCH2CH3); 63.5 (4″-OCH2CH3), 76.7 (C-2); 114.5 (C-3″,5″); 116.3 (C-8); 121.3 (C-4a); 122.0 (C-6); 122.3 (C-α); 123.5 (C-3′,5′); 124.8 (C-5); 127.5 (C-3); 127.9 (C-2″,6″); 128.3 (C-4); 128.7 (C-1″); 130.1 (C-2′,6′); 130.7 (C-7); 133.6 (C-β); 146.2 (C-4′); 147.4 (C-1′); 152.2 (C-8a); 159.1 (C-4″) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 456.1 35Cl [M + Na]+ (45); 458.1 37Cl [M + Na]+ (15). EI+-HRMS m/z calcd for (C25H20NO435Cl) 433.1081; found 433.1084. Calcd for (C25H20NO237Cl) 435.1051; found 435.1060.
(E)-4-Chloro-3-(4-ethoxyvinyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-chromene (11h). Yellow oil, η 24%. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 1.43 (t, 3H, 4″-OCH2CH3, J 7.0 Hz); 4.06 (q, 2H, 4″-OCH2CH3, J 7.0 Hz); 6.36 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.42 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.5 Hz); 6.83 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.4 and 8.0 Hz); 6.87 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 9.0 Hz); 6.97 (dt, 1H, H-6, J 1.4 and 7.8 Hz); 7.15 (dt, 1H, H-7, J 1.4 and 7.8 Hz); 7.39 (d, 2H, H-2″,6″, J 9.0 Hz); 7.46 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.5 Hz); 7.56 (d, 1H, H-5, J 1.4 and 8.0 Hz); 7.60 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 9.0 Hz); 8.13 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 9.0 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 14.6 (4″-OCH2CH3); 63.4 (4″-OCH2CH3), 75.4 (C-2); 114.6 (C-3″,5″); 116.4 (C-8); 120.6 (C-α); 122.0 (C-4a); 122.1 (C-6); 123.6 (C-3′,5′); 125.0 (C-5); 126.2 (C-4); 126.4 (C-1″); 128.1 (C-2′,6′); 128.5 (C-2″,6″); 128.7 (C-3); 130.2 (C-7); 131.5 (C-β); 144.8 (C-1′); 147.8 (C-4′); 151.4 (C-8a); 159.4 (C-4″) ppm.
(Z)-4-Chloro-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrovinyl)-2H-chromene (10i). Orange solid, η 52%, m. p. 163–165 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 5.85 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.63 (d, 1H, H-α, J 12.2 Hz); 6.74 (d, 1H, H-β, J 12.2 Hz); 6.84 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 7.01 (ddd, 1H, H-6, J 1.3, 7.3 and 8.0 Hz); 7.24 (ddd, 1H, H-7, J 1.3, 7.3 and 8.0 Hz); 7.36 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.8 Hz); 7.56 (dd, 1H, H-5, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 7.58 (d, 2H, H-2″,6″, J 8.8 Hz); 8.09 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.8 Hz); 8.20 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 8.8 Hz) ppm.13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 77.0 (C-2); 116.6 (C-8); 120.8 (C-4a); 122.4 (C-6); 123.7 (C-3″,5″); 124.0 (C-3′,5′); 125.2 (C-5); 126.4 (C-3); 127.8 (C-α); 127.9 (C-2′,6′); 128.6 (C-4); 129.3 (C-2″,6″); 131.3 (C-7); 131.5 (C-β); 142.8 (C-1″); 145.3 (C-1′); 147.3 (C-4″); 147.9 (C-4′); 152.2 (C-8a) ppm. ESI+-MS m/z (%): 457.1 Cl35 [M + Na]+ (80); 459.1 Cl37 [M + Na]+ (15). EI-HRMS m/z calcd for (C23H15N235ClO5) 434.0669, found 434.0668. Calcd for (C23H15N237ClO5) 436.0640, found 436.0647.
(E)-4-Chloro-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrovinyl)-2H-chromene (11i). Orange solid, η 27%, m. p. 180–182 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.38 (s, 1H, H-2); 6.49 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.5 Hz); 6.85 (dd, 1H, H-8, J 1.3 and 8.0 Hz); 7.01 (ddd, 1H, H-6, J 1.3, 7.6 and 8.0 Hz); 7.21 (ddd, 1H, H-7, J 1.3, 7.6 and 8.0 Hz); 7.57–7.62 (m, 5H, H-5, 2′,6′, 2″,6″); 7.75 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.5 Hz); 8.16 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.8 Hz); 8.20 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 8.8 Hz) ppm. 13C-NMR: δ 75.4 (C-2); 116.9 (C-8); 121.6 (C-4a); 122.5 (C-6); 123.9 (C-3″,5″); 124.2 (C-3′,5′); 125.5 (C-4); 125.8 (C-5); 127.1 (C-α); 127.2 (C-2″,6″); 128.6 (C-2′,6′); 129.1 (C-β); 130.6 (C-3); 131.6 (C-7); 142.6 (C-1″); 144.3 (C-1′); 147.2 (C-4″); 148.1 (C-4′); 152.0 (C-8a) ppm.

3.6. General Procedure for the Synthesis of (Z- and E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styrylquinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehydes 12ai/13ai

The appropriate phosphonium halide salt (8ac, 0.20 mmol) in dry THF (20 mL) and sodium hydride (6 mg, 0.20 mmol) were placed in a previously dried flask. The mixture was heated at 60 °C for 15, 7 and 3 min to prepare the ylide 9a, 9b and 9c, respectively. After these periods, the formylated derivative 2df was added (0.07 mmol). The reaction mixture was refluxed or maintained at room temperature for the appropriate time depending of each formylated derivative (see Table 2). At the end, the reaction mixture was poured into water (40 mL) and ice (50 g), the pH adjusted to 3 with dilute hydrochloric acid. The reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 20 mL), the solvent was dried using anhydrous sodium sulphate and evaporated to dryness on the evaporator. The residue was purified by thin layer chromatography using mixtures of dichloromethane/hexane as eluent.
(E)-4-Chloro-2-phenyl-3-styrylquinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehyde (12a). Yellow solid, η 44% (11 mg), m.p. 72–74 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.80 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.4 Hz); 6.97 (s, 1H, H-2); 7.02–7.05 (m, 1H, H-8); 7.20–7.35 (m, 10H, H-6,7, 3′,4′,5′,2″,3″,4″,5″,6″); 7.46 (m, 2H, H-2′,6′); 7.57 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.4 Hz); 7.81–7.84 (m, 1H, H-5); 8.68 (s, 1H, 1-NCHO) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 52.2 (C-2); 118.2 (C-8); 123.1 (C-β); 126.0 (C-5); 126.2 (C-6); 126.5 (C-4a); 127.0 (C-4); 127.1 (C-2′,6′); 127.5 (C-2″,6″); 128.3 (C-4′); 128.6 (C-4″); 128.8 (C-3′,5′,3″,5″); 129.6 (C-7); 131.4 (C-1′); 133.6 (C-α); 134.1 (C-3); 136.5 (C-1″); 137.2 (C-8a); 161.0 (1-NCHO) ppm. MS (ESI+) m/z (%): 394.1 35Cl [M + Na]+ (100), 396.1 37Cl [M + Na]+ (38). MS (ESI+) calcd for (C24H1835ClNO) 371.1077; found 371.1078. Calcd for (C24H1837ClNO) 373.1047; found 372.1048.
(E)-4-Chloro-3-(4-nitrostyryl)-2-phenylquinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehyde (12c). Orange solid, η 40% (12 mg), m.p. 243.5-245.3 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.81 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.4 Hz); 6.96 (s, 1H, H-2); 7.04–7.07 (m, 1H, H-8); 7.23–7.32 (m, 7H, H-6,7, 2′,3′,4′,5′,6′); 7.59 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.8 Hz); 7.71 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.4 Hz); 7.85–7.88 (m, 1H, H-5); 8.19 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 8.8 Hz); 8.67 (s, 1H, 1-NCHO) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 52.1 (C-2); 118.3 (C-8); 124.1 (C-3″,5″); 125.9 (C-4a); 126.2 (C-6); 126.7 (C-5); 127.2 (C-β); 127.3 (C-4); 127.4 (C-2″,6″, 2′,6′); 128.6 (C-4′); 128.7 (C-3′,5′); 129.1 (C-3); 130.4 (C-7); 130.7 (C-α); 134.3 (C-8a); 136.8 (C-1′); 142.9 (C-1″); 147.2 (C-4″); 161.0 (1-NCHO) ppm. MS (ESI+) m/z (%): 417.9 35Cl [M + H]+ (100), 419.9 37Cl [M + H]+ (3). MS (ESI+) calcd for (C24H1735ClN2O3) 416.0928; found 416.0929. Calcd for (C24H1735ClN2O3) 418.0898; found 418.0100
(E)-4-Chloro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-styrylquinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehyde (12d). White solid, η 46% (13 mg), m.p. 173–175 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 3.72 (s, 3H, 4′-OCH3); 6.74 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.8 Hz); 6.79 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.4 Hz); 6.91 (s, 1H, H-2); 7.01–7.04 (m, 1H, H-8); 7.21 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.8 Hz); 7.22–7.28 (m, 3H, H-3″,4″,5″); 7.33 (t, 2H, H-6,7, J 7.3 Hz); 7.45–7.48 (m, 2H, H-2″,6″); 7.54 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.4 Hz); 7.80–7.84 (m, 1H, H-5); 8.67 (s, 1H, 1-NCHO) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 51.9 (C-2); 55.2 (4′-OCH3); 114.1 (C-3′,5′); 118.2 (C-8); 123.0 (C-β); 125.9 (C-6); 126.2 (C-5); 126.5 (C-4a); 126.8 (C-4); 127.0 (C-3″,5″); 128.6 (C-4″); 128.7 (C-2′,6′); 128.8 (C-2″,6″); 129.5 (C-1′); 131.5 (C-3); 133.5 (C-α); 134.0 (C-8a); 136.6 (C-1″); 159.4 (C-4′); 160.9 (1-NCHO) ppm. MS (ESI+) m/z (%): 424.1 35Cl [M + Na]+ (100); 426.1 37Cl [M + Na]+ (37). MS (ESI+) calcd for (C25H2135ClNO2) 402.1255; found 402.1253. Calcd for (C25H2137ClNO2) 404.1255; found 402.1254.
(E)-4-Chloro-3-(4-ethoxystyryl)-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)quinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehyde (12e). Yellow solid, η 27% (8 mg), m.p. 234–236 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3):δ 1.41 (t, 3H, 4″-OCH2CH3, J 7,0 Hz); 3.70 (s, 3H, 4′-OCH3); 4.04 (q, 2H, 4″-OCH2CH3, J 7,0 Hz); 6.73 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 8.8 Hz); 6.74 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.2 Hz); 6.85 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.8 Hz); 6.89 (s, 1H, H-2); 7.02–7.03 (m, 1H, H-8); 7.20 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.8 Hz); 7.23–7.26 (m, 2H, H-6,7); 7.39 (d, 2H, H-2″,6″, J 8.8 Hz); 7.40 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.2 Hz); 7.79–7.82 (m, 1H, H-5); 8.66 (s, 1H, 1-NCHO) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 14.8 (4″-OCH2CH3); 51.8 (C-2); 55.1 (4′-OCH3); 63.5 (4″-OCH2CH3); 114.0 (C-3″,5″); 114.7 (C-3′,5′); 118.1 (C-8); 120.8 (C-α); 125.6 (C-1″); 125.9 (C-5); 126.0 (C-6); 126.6 (C-4a); 128.4 (C-2″,6″); 128.8 (C-2′,6′); 129.2 (C-7); 129.5 (C-1′) 131.9 (C-3); 133.2 (C-β,8a); 133.9 (C-4); 159.3 (C-4′); 159.5 (C-4″); 161.0 (1-NCHO) ppm. MS (ESI+) m/z (%): 445.9 35Cl [M + H]+ (100); 447.9 37Cl [M + H]+ (13).MS (ESI+) m/z calcd for (C27H2535ClNO3) 446.1516; found 446.1517. Calcd for (C27H2537ClNO3) 448.1516; found 446.1519.
(E)-4-Chloro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(4-nitrostyryl)quinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehyde (12f). Yellow solid, η 53% (17 mg), m.p. 209–211 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 3.72 (4′-OCH3); 6.76 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.7 Hz); 6.80 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.1 Hz); 6.90 (s, 1H, H-2); 7.04–7.07 (m, 1H, H-8); 7.20 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.7 Hz); 7.29–7.32 (m, 2H, H-6,7); 7.58 (d, 2H, H-2″,6″, J 8.7 Hz); 7.69 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.1 Hz); 7.84–7.88 (m, 1H, H-5); 8.18 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 8.7 Hz); 8.67 (s, 1H, 1-NCHO) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 51.8 (C-2); 55.2 (C-4′); 114.2 (C-3′,5′); 118.3 (C-8); 124.1 (C-3″,5″); 126.0 (C-4a); 126.1 (C-6); 126.6 (C-5); 127.2 (C-β); 127.4 (C-2′,6′); 128.7 (C-2″,6″); 128.9 (C-1′); 129.6 (C-4); 130.4 (C-7); 130.6 (C-α); 130.8 (C-3); 134.3 (C-8a); 143.0 (C-1″); 147.2 (C-4″); 159.6 (C-4′); 160.9 (1-NCHO) ppm. MS (ESI+) m/z (%): 469.9 35Cl [M + Na]+ (100); 471.9 37Cl [M+Na]+ (2). MS (ESI+) calcd for (C25H2035ClN2O4) 447.1106; found 447.1110. Calcd for (C25H2037ClN2O4) 449.1106; found 448.1109.
(E)-4-Chloro-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-3-styrylquinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehyde (12g). Orange solid, η 30% (9 mg), m.p. 179.9–180.7 °C. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 6.74 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.4 Hz); 7.04 (s, 1H, H-2); 7.04–7.07 (m, 1H, H-8); 7.29–7.38 (m, 5H, H-3″,4″,5″,6,7); 7.46–7.49 (m, 4H, H-2′,6′, 2″,6″); 7.60 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.4 Hz); 7.83–7.87 (m, 1H, H-5); 8.09 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.8 Hz); 8.71 (s, 1H, 1-NCHO) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 51.3 (C-2); 118.2 (C-8); 122.8 (C-β); 124.1 (C-3′,5′); 126.1 (C-4a); 126.5 (C-6); 126.54 (C-5); 127.1 (C-2′,6′); 127.7 (C-4); 128.6 (C-3′,5′); 128.9 (C-3″,5″); 129.0 (C-4″); 130.0 (C-7); 130.2 (C-8a); 133.5 (C-3); 133.7 (C-α); 136.1 (C-1′); 144.3 (C-1′); 147.8 (C-4′); 161.0 (1-NCHO) ppm. MS (ESI+) m/z (%): 417.1 35Cl [M + H]+ (30); 419.1 37Cl [M + H]+ (2). MS (ESI+) calcd for (C24H1835ClN2O3) 417.0996; found 417.0999. Calcd for (C24H1837ClN2O3) 419.0996; found 417.0997.
(E)-4-Chloro-3-(4-ethoxystyryl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)quinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehyde (12h). Yellow oil, η 24%. 1H-NMR (300.13 MHz; CDCl3): δ 1.42 (t, 3H, 4″-OCH2CH3, J 7.0 Hz); 4.04 (q, 2H, 4″-OCH2CH3, J 7.0); 6.69 (d, 1H, H-β, J 16.4 Hz); 6.86 (d, 2H, H-3″,5″, J 8.7 Hz); 7.01 (s, 1H, H-2); 7.03–7.06 (m, 1H, H-8); 7.27–7.31 (m, 2H, H-6,7); 7.40 (d, 2H, H-2″,6″, J 8.7 Hz); 7.47 (d, 2H, H-2′,6′, J 8.7 Hz); 7.47 (d, 1H, H-α, J 16.4 Hz); 7.81–7.84 (m, 1H, H-5); 8.08 (d, 2H, H-3′,5′, J 8.7 Hz); 8.70 (s, 1H, 1-NCHO) ppm. 13C-NMR (75.47 MHz; CDCl3): δ 14.8 (4″-OCH2CH3); 51.3 (C-2); 63.6 (4″-OCH2CH3); 114.8 (C-3″,5″); 118.2 (C-8); 120.5 (C-α); 124.1 (C-3′,5′); 126.2 (C-4a); 126.3 (C-5); 126.4 (C-6); 128.5 (C-2″,6″); 128.6 (C-2′,6′); 128.7 (C-1″); 129.7 (C-7); 130.5 (C-3); 133.3 (C-β); 133.5 (C-4); 144.4 (C-1′); 147.7 (C-4′); 159.8 (C-4″); 161.1 (1-NCHO) ppm. MS (ESI+) m/z (%): 461.1 35Cl [M + H]+ (50); 463.1 37Cl [M + H]+ (3).MS (ESI+) m/z calcd for (C26H2235ClN2O4) 461.1263; found 461.1261. Calcd for (C26H2237ClN2O4) 463.1263; found 463.1263.

3.7. Theoretical Studies

Theoretic studies were performed get an insight into the selectivity of the Wittig reaction with quinoline-3-carbaldehydes 2df. All relevant structures were optimized using density functional theory (DFT). Gaussian 09 et al. [33] was used for all single-point calculations employing the standard fine grid and a B3LYP/6-31G(d) [34,35,36] level of theory. This is in agreement with the literature that suggests that larger basis sets do not cause significant changes in the relative energies of the two diastereomeric transition states, here in study. The use of THF as solvent was simulated using a standard PCM model. Vibrational frequency calculations were performed to ensure the optimized structures represented the local minima. All transition states here shown contained a single negative frequency, and the corresponding eigenvector was verified to correspond to the expected reaction coordinate. IRC calculations were also performed and lead to the formation of the next intermediate.

4. Conclusions

This work establishes that 2-aryl-4-chloro-2H-chromene-3-carbaldehydes are useful building blocks and afforded several new derivatives in good yields. Interesting heterocycles, such as 3H-chromeno[3,4-c]quinolines, were obtained, and it also demonstrated that they could be used in Wittig reactions to get new (Z and E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styryl-2H-chromenes. It was evident that 2-aryl-4-chloro-1,2-dihydroquinoline-1,3-dicarbaldehydes are less reactive. However, it was also possible to use them in Wittig reactions, where they showed high selectivity towards the (E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styrylquinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehydes. This unique selectivity was explained through density functional theory analysis.

Author Contributions

Investigation, D.H.A.R., E.J.F.B., V.F.B.; conceptualization, D.C.G.A.P. and A.M.S.S.; supervision, D.C.G.A.P. and A.M.S.S.; validation, D.C.G.A.P. and A.M.S.S.; formal analysis, D.H.A.R., V.F.B.; D.C.G.A.P. and A.M.S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.H.A.R., V.F.B.; D.C.G.A.P.; writing—review and editing, D.C.G.A.P. and A.M.S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to the University of Aveiro and FCT/MCT for the financial support for the QOPNA research Unit (UID/QUI/00062/2019) and the LAQV-REQUIMTE (UIDB/50006/2020) througH-National funds and, where applicable, co-financed by the FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement, and to the Portuguese NMR Network. D.H.A.R. and V.F.B. also thanks FCT for their PhD grant (SFRH/BD/68991/2010) and (PD/BD/135099/2017), respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Murthy, Y.L.N.; Suhasini, K.P.; Pathania, A.S.; Bhushan, S.; Sastry, Y.N. Synthesis, structure activity relationship and mode of action of 3-substitutedphenyl-1-(2,2,8,8-tetramethyl-3,4,9,10-tetrahydro-2H, 8H-pyrano[2,3-f]chromen-6-yl)-propenones as novel anticancer agents in human leukaemia HL-60 cells. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 62, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Joshi, P.; Vishwakarma, R.A.; Bharate, S.B. Natural alkaloids as P-gp inhibitors for multidrug resistance reversal in cancer. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 138, 273–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Conti, C.; Desideri, N. New 4H-chromen-4-one and 2H-chromene derivatives as anti-picornavirus capsid-binders. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 6480–6488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zheng, P.; Somersan-Karakaya, S.; Lu, S.; Roberts, J.; Pingle, M.; Warrier, T.; Little, D.; Guo, X.; Brickner, S.J.; Nathan, C.F.; et al. Synthetic calanolides with bactericidal activity against replicating and nonreplicating mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 3755–3772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Felicetti, T.; Cannalire, R.; Nizi, M.G.; Tabarrini, O.; Massari, S.; Barreca, M.L.; Manfroni, G.; Schindler, B.D.; Cecchetti, V.; Kaatz, G.W.; et al. Studies on 2-phenylquinoline Staphylococcus aureus NorA efflux pump inhibitors: New insights on the C-6 position. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 155, 428–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Najafi, Z.; Saeedi, M.; Mahdavi, M.; Sabourian, R.; Khanavi, M.; Tehrani, M.B.; Moghadam, F.H.; Edraki, N.; Karimpor-Razkenari, E.; Sharifzadeh, M.; et al. Design and synthesis of novel anti-Alzheimer’s agents: Acridine-chromenone and quinoline-chromenone hybrids. Bioorg. Chem. 2016, 67, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Balabani, A.; Hadjipavlou-Litina, D.J.; Litinas, K.E.; Mainou, M.; Tsironi, C.-C.; Vronteli, A. Synthesis and biological evaluation of (2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-2H-chromen-2-ones as free radical scavengers. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 5894–5901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bernotas, R.C.; Singhaus, R.R.; Kaufman, D.H.; Ullrich, J.; Fletcher, H.; Quinet, E.; Nambi, P.; Unwalla, R.; Wilhelmsson, A.; Nilsson, A.G.; et al. Biarylether amide quinolines as liver X receptor agonists. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 1663–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Facchini, P.J. Alkaloid biosynthesis in plants: Biochemistry, cell biology, molecular regulation and metabolic engineering applications. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2001, 52, 29–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Okunade, A.L. Ageratum conyzoids L. (Asteraceae). Fitoterapia 2002, 73, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cheenpracha, S.; Karalai, C.; Pronglimanont, C.; Kanjana-Opas, A. Candenatenins A-F, phenolic compounds from the heartwood of Dalbergia candenatensis. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 1395–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chung, P.-Y.; Bian, Z.-X.; Pun, H.-Y.; Chan, D.; Chan, A.S.-C.; Chui, C.-H.; Tang, J.C.-O.; Lam, K.-H. Recent advances in research of natural and synthetic bioactive quinolines. Future Med. Chem. 2015, 7, 947–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, R.; Chen, X.; Song, X.-R.; Ding, H.; Wang, P.; Xiao, Q.; Liang, Y.-M. Copper-catalyzed cascade cyclization of 2-propynolphenols: Access to 4-phosphorylated 2H-chromenes. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 3962–3967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bogza, Y.P.; Rastrepin, A.A.; Nider, V.V.; Zheleznova, T.Y.; Stasyuk, A.J.; Kurowska, A.; Laba, K.; Ulyankin, E.B.; Domagala, W.; Fisyuk, A.S. Synthesis and optical properties of 2-functionally substituted 4,5-dihydrothieno[3,2-c]quinolines. Dye Pigment 2018, 159, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ren, M.; Wang, S.; Yang, C.; Xu, H.; Guo, Y.; Roekaerts, D. Supercritical water oxidation of quinoline with moderate preheat temperature and initial concentration. Fuel 2019, 236, 1408–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rocha, D.H.A.; Vaz, P.A.A.M.; Pinto, D.C.G.A.; Silva, A.M.S. Synthesis of chalcones and their isomerization into flavanones and azaflavanones. Methods Protoc. 2019, 2, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sandulache, A.; Silva, A.M.S.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S. Diels-Alder reactions of chromone-3-carboxaldehydes with ortho-benzoquinodimethane. New synthesis of benzo[b]xanthones. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Coelho, A.; El-Maatougui, A.; Raviña, E.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S.; Silva, A.M.S. Efficient consecutive alkylation-Knoevenagel functionalisations in formyl aza-heterocycles using supported organic bases. Synlett 2006, 2006, 3324–3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kochanowska-Karamyan, A.J.; Hamann, M.T. Marine indole alkaloids: Potential new drug leads for the control of depression and anxiety. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 4489–44971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Chadha, N.; Silakari, O. Indoles as therapeutics of interest in medicinal chemistry: Bird’s eye view. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 134, 159–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abdelfatah, S.A.A.; Efferth, T. Cytotoxicity of the indole alkaloid reserpine from Rauwolfia serpentine against drug-resistant tumor cells. Phytomedicine 2015, 22, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Crump, M.; Leppä, S.; Fayad, L.; Lee, J.J.; Rocco, A.D.; Ogura, M.; Hagberg, H.; Schnell, F.; Rifkin, R.; Mackensen, A.; et al. Randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial of enzastaurin versus placebo in patients achieving remission after first-line therapy for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 2484–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xia, Q.; Bao, X.; Sun, C.; Wu, D.; Rong, X.; Liu, Z.; Gu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Liang, G. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 2-sulfonylindoles as potential anti-inflammatory therapeutic agents for treatment of acute lung injury. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 160, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hurdle, J.G.; O’Neill, A.J.; Chopra, I. Anti-staphylococcal activity of indolimycin, a potential topical agent for control of staphylococcal infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004, 54, 549–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Sanna, G.; Madeddu, S.; Giliberti, G.; Piras, S.; Struga, M.; Wrzosek, M.; Kubiak-Tomaszewska, G.; Koziol, A.E.; Savchenko, O.; Lis, T.; et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel indole-derived thioureas. Molecules 2018, 23, 2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wu, S.; Yang, Q.; Hu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H.; Wu, L.; Li, J. Manganese-catalyzed direct C2-allylation of indoles. Org. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 2852–2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, Z.; Kwon, O.; Huang, H.; Fadli, A.; Marat, X.; Moreau, M.; Lumb, J.-P. A bioinspired synthesis of polyfunctional indoles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 11963–11967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Uesawa, Y.; Sakagami, H.; Ishihara, M.; Kagaya, H.; Kanamoto, T.; Terakubo, S.; Nakashima, H.; Yahagi, H.; Takao, K.; Sugita, Y. Quantitative structure-cytotoxicity relationship of 3-styryl-2H-chromenes. Anticancer Res. 2015, 35, 5299–5308. [Google Scholar]
  29. Panda, P.; Nayak, S.; Bhakta, S.; Mohapatra, S.; Murthy, T.R. Design and synthesis of (Z/E)-2-phenyl/H-3-styryl-2H-chromene derivatives as antimicrotubule agents. J. Chem. Sci. 2018, 130, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Sandulache, A.; Silva, A.M.S.; Pinto, D.C.G.A.; Almeida, L.M.P.M.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S. Wittig reactions of chromone-3-carboxaldehydes with benzylidenetriphenyl phosphoranes: A new synthesis of 3-styrylchromones. New J. Chem. 2003, 27, 1592–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Robiette, R.; Richardson, J.; Aggarwal, V.; Harvey, J. Reactivity and selectivity in the Wittig reaction: A computational study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2394–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Seixas, R.S.G.R.; Silva, A.M.S.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S. New synthesis of (Z)-and (E)-3-styryl-4-quinolones. Synlett 2010, 2010, 2257–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision, A.2; Gaussian: Wallingford, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  34. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lee, C.T.; Yang, W.T.; Parr, R.G. Development of the Colle-Solvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Hariharan, P.C.; Pople, J.A. The influence of polarization functions on molecular orbital hydrogenation energies. Theor. Chim. Acta 1973, 28, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 4-chlorochromene-3-carbaldehydes 2ac and 4-chloroquinoline-3-carbaldehydes 2df.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 4-chlorochromene-3-carbaldehydes 2ac and 4-chloroquinoline-3-carbaldehydes 2df.
Molecules 25 03791 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 3,3′-[(2-aryl-4-chloro-2H-chromen-3-yl)methylene]bis(1H-indoles) 4ac.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 3,3′-[(2-aryl-4-chloro-2H-chromen-3-yl)methylene]bis(1H-indoles) 4ac.
Molecules 25 03791 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 6-aryl-6H-chromeno[3,4-c]quinolines 7af.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 6-aryl-6H-chromeno[3,4-c]quinolines 7af.
Molecules 25 03791 sch003
Scheme 4. Synthesis of (Z- and E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styryl-2H-chromenes 10ai and 11ai.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of (Z- and E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styryl-2H-chromenes 10ai and 11ai.
Molecules 25 03791 sch004
Scheme 5. Synthesis of (Z- and E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styrylquinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehydes 12ai and 13ai.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of (Z- and E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styrylquinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehydes 12ai and 13ai.
Molecules 25 03791 sch005
Scheme 6. Preliminary investigation into the mechanism of the Wittig reaction.
Scheme 6. Preliminary investigation into the mechanism of the Wittig reaction.
Molecules 25 03791 sch006
Figure 1. Calculated potential energy surface for the reaction of 2a with triphenylphosphonium ylide 9a.
Figure 1. Calculated potential energy surface for the reaction of 2a with triphenylphosphonium ylide 9a.
Molecules 25 03791 g001
Table 1. Optimization of reaction conditions for the synthesis of (Z and E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styryl-2H-chromenes 10af and 11ai.
Table 1. Optimization of reaction conditions for the synthesis of (Z and E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styryl-2H-chromenes 10af and 11ai.
EntryComp. 2YlideNaH a
(Equiv)
1st Step b
(Time)
2nd Step c
(Time)
(Z)-isomer d
(Yield, %)
(E)-isomer d
(Yield, %)
12a (R=H)9a53 h3 h10a, 1811a, 10
273 h3 h 30 min10a, 2511a, 19
371.5 h21 h10a, 3211a, 5
4720 min24 h10a, 3211a, 25
59b710 min3 h 45 min10b, 4511b, 25
69c73 min24 h10c, 4111c, 33
72b (R=OCH3)9a715 min3 h 50 min10d, 5011d, 28
89b85 min3 h 30 min10e, 5011e, 20
99c83 min3 h10f, 5311f, 35
102c (R=NO2)9a815 min5 h10g, -11g, -
11815 min3 h10g, -11g, -
12910 min24 h f10g, 2711g, -
13310 min40 min f10g, 3411g, 15
149b72 min4 h10h, 2011h, -
1573 min1 h f10h, 4511h, 24
169c86 min4 h10i, -11i, -
17310 min e2 hf10i, 5211i, 27
a Molar excess; b Time to obtain the ylide; c Time after the aldehyde addition; d Isolated compound yield in %; e THF freshly dried; f Second step at room temperature.
Table 2. Optimization of reaction conditions for the synthesis of (E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styrylquinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehydes 12ai.
Table 2. Optimization of reaction conditions for the synthesis of (E)-2-aryl-4-chloro-3-styrylquinoline-1(2H)-carbaldehydes 12ai.
EntryComp. 2Ylide2nd step a
(Time)
Comp. 12(E)-Isomer b
(Yield, %)
12d (R=H)9a50 min12a35
21 h 20 min12a40
32 h12a44
49b46 min12b17 c
51 h 30 min12b35 c
69c2 h12c33
73 h12c40
82e (R=OCH3)9a45 min12d46
91 h 20 min12d35
102 h 20 min12d20
119b40 min12e27
121 h 20 min12e25
139c2 h12f43
143 h12f53
152f (R=NO2)9a58 min12g18
162 h 20 min12g30
179b45 min12h24
189c55 min12i-
192 h12i27c
a Time after the aldehyde addition; b Isolated compound yield in %; c Mixture of the two isomers.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rocha, D.H.A.; Batista, V.F.; Balsa, E.J.F.; Pinto, D.C.G.A.; Silva, A.M.S. Chromene- and Quinoline-3-Carbaldehydes: Useful Intermediates in the Synthesis of Heterocyclic Scaffolds. Molecules 2020, 25, 3791. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173791

AMA Style

Rocha DHA, Batista VF, Balsa EJF, Pinto DCGA, Silva AMS. Chromene- and Quinoline-3-Carbaldehydes: Useful Intermediates in the Synthesis of Heterocyclic Scaffolds. Molecules. 2020; 25(17):3791. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173791

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rocha, Djenisa H. A., Vasco F. Batista, Emanuel J. F. Balsa, Diana C. G. A. Pinto, and Artur M. S. Silva. 2020. "Chromene- and Quinoline-3-Carbaldehydes: Useful Intermediates in the Synthesis of Heterocyclic Scaffolds" Molecules 25, no. 17: 3791. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25173791

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop