1. Introduction
The increasing trend of obesity worldwide is accompanied by the increasing prevalence of many obesity-related disorders such as cardiovascular and kidney diseases, diabetes, cancers, and musculoskeletal disorders [
1]. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is tightly associated with obesity and it is becoming the leading cause of liver-related mortality [
2]. NAFLD encompasses a wide spectrum of conditions, from simple accumulation of fat (steatosis) to steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, and cirrhosis with consequent higher risk to develop hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [
2,
3,
4]. The accumulation of extracellular matrix in the liver, which leads to progressive fibrosis, cirrhosis and liver failure, is the major cause of liver-related death in patients with NAFLD [
5,
6]. An early event in the development of hepatic fibrosis is the activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSC). Upon activation, HSC change their phenotype into myofibroblast-like cells with increased production of extracellular matrix (ECM) components, with the production of cytokines and chemokines for the recruitment of inflammatory cells, and the progression from fatty liver to NASH [
7,
8]. To date, despite many efforts to unravel NAFLD pathogenesis, no effective agent is available for the treatment of fibrosis in NAFLD context.
The extract from milk thistle fruit and seeds is referred to Silymarin, which is a mixture of polyphenolic flavonoids. Silybin (also referred to Silibinin) is the major component (50–60%) of Silymarin, and it is the primary bioactive principle. Several studies have shown its hepatoprotective and antihepatotoxic properties in many liver diseases such as viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, hepatic intoxication, cirrhosis, and HCC [
9,
10]. The antifibrotic efficacy of Silybin is mainly supported by results obtained in animal models where Silybin significantly reduced α-smooth muscle (α-SMA) positive cells and procollagen mRNA and regulated the expression of matrix metalloproteinases [
11,
12,
13]. More recently, studies on in vivo model of NAFLD demonstrated its efficacy also in this disease where Silybin ameliorated insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, inflammation, oxidative stress, and fibrosis with a general improvement of the liver health [
14,
15,
16].
In this context, some clinical trials evaluated the efficacy of Silybin. Most of the studies found that Silybin is able to reduce transaminases level as well as induce a general improvement of the “hepatic status” [
17,
18]. Moreover, a trial performed in adults subjects with biopsy-proven NASH showed that silymarin reduced liver fibrosis and stiffness with no effects on NAFLD score [
19]. In other studies, authors found that the combination of Silybin with vitamin E improved hepatic biochemical profile, anthropometric parameters, lipidic and glycemic metabolisms, and the ultrasonographic score of liver steatosis [
20,
21]. Recently, a meta-analysis involving 587 patients concluded that silymarin represented a promising treatment to improve liver function in NAFLD patients [
22]. However, the lack of standardization of Silybin preparations and the combination with other factors (e.g., vitamin E or Mediterranean diet) makes it difficult to take consistent conclusions from these promising data.
Despite many pieces of evidence about the general hepatoprotective effects of Silybin, both in preclinical models and in a clinical setting, very few data about the molecular mechanisms underlying the antifibrotic efficacy are currently available.
We previously developed an in vitro human NASH model (SCC) able to reproduce the initial phases of NASH development thanks to cell-to-cell interactions. Specifically, we reported that exposure to FFA induced their accumulation into hepatocytes and the activation of hepatic stellate cells as demonstrated by overexpression of α-SMA, accumulation of extracellular collagen and modulation of metalloproteinases (MMPs), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP) [
23]. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the in vitro effect of Silybin in our well-established coculture model of NASH that reproduces the initial phases of NASH development and by comparison of the effects on each monoculture system.
Here we demonstrate that Silybin exerts a direct beneficial effect on HSC by reducing the FFA induction of cell proliferation and ROS generation. More importantly, the net reduction of collagen observed in SCC after FFA and Silybin administration was the result of the modulation of MMP2-9 activity on hepatocytes, thus highlighting the importance of the cross-talk between hepatocytes and HSC not only in the development, but also in the resolution of NASH.
3. Discussion
Silybin (also referred to as Silibinin) is the major component (50–60%) of Silymarin and is considered the primary bioactive principle that exerts many beneficial effects on the liver. In particular, it has been demonstrated that Silybin has anti-inflammatory, antifibrotic, and antioxidant properties. However, despite its wide use and the extensive studies both in vitro and in vivo, the molecular mechanisms underlying its potential effects as an antifibrotic agent have not been fully elucidated so far.
In this study, we assessed the effect of Silybin in counteracting the FFA noxious stimuli using the SCC approach, which represents a more realistic model for the study of fibrogenesis [
23] where hepatocytes and HSC are cultured together in tight contact. The response of each cell type was also analyzed in their respective monocultures. These data confirm our previous results where we reported a differential behavior to the same stimuli when hepatocytes and HSC are in close contact or in the monoculture system [
23], highlighting the importance of cell-to-cell contact for the study of the mechanisms involved in fibrosis resolution/reversion. For instance, in the present study, we observed that the cytotoxicity of Silybin alone induced a slight, but statistically relevant, reduction in cell viability of both Huh7 and HSC at the highest concentration (7.5 μM) and longest exposure time (144 h). Conversely, this toxic effect disappeared in the SCC. Even more interesting is the cellular response to FFA, while in Huh7 cell viability was unchanged, in LX2 cells FFA induced a time-dependent proliferative effect, which was slightly reduced by the addition of Silybin. Once again, the SCC treatment with FFA with or without Silybin seemed to be safe in all the experimental conditions.
Regarding the antifibrotic effects, we observed that Silybin had some direct effects on LX2 by reducing cell proliferation as well as a transient regulation of the expression of collagen (COL1A1) after 96 h that could explain the reduction of FFA-induced extracellular collagen deposition observed in the SCC. In a previous in vitro study conducted on primary HSC that were isolated from human liver and activated by just the contact with the flask’s plastic surface, the authors demonstrated that Silybin was able to inhibit PDGF-BB profibrogenic action including cell proliferation, motility, and de novo synthesis of extracellular matrix components [
25]. Similarly, in a study conducted on LX2 cells activated by TGF-β, Silybin A demonstrated a significant antiproliferative effect and a strong antifibrotic effect mediated by the downregulation of COL1A1, TIMP1, and MMP2 genes and reduction of TGF-β release [
26]. Antiproliferative effects of Silybin on LX2 cells were confirmed by Ezhilarasan et al. that showed that Silybin can modulate pathways involved in cell cycle through upregulation of p27 and p53 and the consequent inhibition of downstream Akt and phosphorylated-Akt protein signaling and Ki-67 protein expression [
27]. Conversely, and in spite of the reduction of LX2 cell proliferation and the downregulation of the gene COL1A1 after 96 h, we did not evidence a reduction in the collagen deposition in LX2 monoculture. A possible explanation of this observation is that compared to the data reported in the literature, here we used lower Silybin concentrations. It worth to be mentioned that the reported effects on HSC proliferation were observed using concentrations similar to ours (5–10 µM) silybin [
25,
27] while the modulation of collagen biosynthesis was assessed only at a higher concentration ranging from 25–100 µM [
25,
26].
To elucidate the molecular mechanisms responsible for the reduction of observed collagen deposition in SCC, we evaluated the activity of MMP2-9 as the principal proteinase involved in collagen degradation. MMPs and their inhibitors—tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMPs)—have been extensively studied for their crucial role in fibrogenesis [
28,
29]. During the fibrogenic process, the great increase of MMP2-9 level is accompanied by the increase in TIMP1-2 level as a mechanism to regulate MMP2-9 proteolytic activity. In this phase, the balance between the two proteins results in MMP2-9 inhibition and a consequent reduction in ECM degradation. On the other hand, during fibrolysis, the reduction of TIMP1, allows free MMPs to degrade ECM [
7]. In this study, we evaluated the activity of free-MMP2-9 in the supernatant of the cell cultures and we found that FFAs modulate the proteolytic activity of these enzymes in hepatocytes and that the addition of Silybin at the highest concentration completely restored the enzymatic activity. Conversely, no effects were observed in LX2. On the other hand, in the SCC we found that FFAs affected MMP2-9 activity only at 96 h and that cotreatment with Silybin was effective in restoring the basal activity. Surprisingly, the opposite trend was observed for Silybin cotreatment at 144 h. In the absence of data about the expression of other factors that influence metalloproteinase activity as cytokines expression, any hypothesis about the mechanism that regulates MMP2-9 activity in the SCC system would be fully speculative.
NAFLD is a multifactorial disease and, among the wide spectrum of molecular events, alterations in the cellular oxidative status have been reported as one of the earliest alterations occurring during the abnormal fat accumulation. Indeed, intracellular lipid storage can induce toxicity enhancing the generation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), accompanied by an inflammatory response promoting the wound healing process (fibrosis). The antioxidant properties of Silybin have been widely studied, and represent an interesting aspect for the treatment of NAFLD (extensively reviewed elsewhere [
30]). We reported previously in an in vivo model of NAFLD that oral supplementation with Silymarin reduced the hepatic Malondialdehyde (MDA) (index of lipid peroxidation) and restored the GSH/GSSG ratio. Considering that the major component of Silymarin is the Silybin, it is likely that the observed effects could be attributed to the latter; however, the contribution of the other components cannot be excluded. In the present study, we explored the antioxidant properties of the Silybin supplementation in the SCC and compared the effect on the monoculture of each cell type to identify which was the target cell. FFA induced enhancement in the production of intracellular ROS both in the monocultures and SCC. The cotreatment with Silybin reestablished the basal redox state in all cell culture systems. Thus, our current findings lead to conclude that the Silybin exerts a general antioxidant effect, which was more pronounced in SCC suggesting a synergy between the two cell types. It is tempting to speculate that oxidative stress is a common feature both in hepatocytes and HSC during the onset of NAFLD pathogenesis.
The SCC provides useful information about the behavior of the system upon stimuli when hepatocytes and HSC are in close contact. As reported previously [
31], the activation of HSC requires cell-to-cell contact with hepatocytes; this effect was induced neither by the soluble mediators released in the transwell system nor by the exposure to hepatocytes conditioned medium. However, as all the in vitro systems, SCC presents some limitations regarding identifying the singular cellular response. In an attempt to tackle this issue, we used the monoculture of each cell type as a control. Moreover, to exclude the effects due to just the interaction of the two cell types in the SCC, we normalized the effects of FFAs or FFA + Silybin vs. the vehicle-treated SCC used as a control. Due to the difference in the response in SCC and monocultures, it is tempting to speculate that the response of SCC is just a summation of the effects from the monocultures. However, the overall response observed in the SCC not always represents the sum (or the average) of each monoculture effect. Taken into consideration all the before mentioned limits, we consider that, under controlled culture conditions, SCC represents a valid in vitro system providing and additional information to the commonly used monoculture set-ups.
In summary, in the present study, we compared the cellular response when HSC and hepatocytes were cultured separately and together in the SCC. Based on our current data, we hypothesize that FFAs induce a fast redox unbalance in both HSC and hepatocytes, followed by a proliferation of HSC with an increase in collagen synthesis and deposition; likewise, in hepatocytes, FFA induced also a reduction in the activity of MMP2-9 that contributed to the enhanced extracellular collagen deposition observed in the SCC. These effects were restored by the supplementation of Silybin, supporting the potentiality of this compound also as an antifibrotic agent.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Chemicals
Cell culture medium: Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s high glucose medium (DMEM-HG), l-glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin, and fetal bovine serum were purchased from Euro-clone (Milan, Italy). 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), oleic acid (C18:1), palmitic acid (C16:0), and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO, USA). AlphaLISA cell lysis buffer and Alpha Immunoassay buffer were from Perkin Elmer (Boston, MA, USA). Silybin was obtained from Extrasynthese, Genay, France (Cat#1040).
4.2. Cellular In Vitro Model and Treatment
Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) LX2 were kindly provided by S.L. Friedman (Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA). The hepatic cell line Huh7 (JHSRRB, Cat#JCRB0403) were obtained from the Japanese Health Science Research Resource Bank (Osaka, Japan). LX2 and Huh7 were maintained in DMEM-HG supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM l-glutamine, and 1% or 10% v/v fetal bovine serum, respectively, at 37 °C in 5% CO2 air humidified atmosphere.
The simultaneous coculture (SCC) was freshly prepared in cell ratio 5:1 (hepatocytes:HSCs) for each experiment and maintained in DMEM-HG supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM l-glutamine, and 1% v/v fetal bovine serum.
For the induction of NASH, SCC and monoculture were exposed to 1200 µM of free fatty acids (FFA) (oleic:palmitic ratio 2:1 µmol/µmol) [
23]. As we reported previously, the minimal Silybin concentration able to induce beneficial effects on FFA-loaded hepatocytes was 5 µM [
14], thus we cotreated SCC and monoculture with Silybin 5 or 7.5 µM for 24, 96, and 144 h. Medium containing FFAs and Silybin was refreshed every 2 days until they reach the experimental time point. Effect of Silybin was evaluated also in absence of FFAs to assess possible side effects. For each culture setup (monoculture or SCC), cells exposed to the vehicle were used as a control. The maximal concentration of vehicle (DMSO) was 0.22%
v/
v. Cell density was 20,000 cells/cm
2, 10,000 cells/cm
2, and 5000 cells/cm
2 at 24, 96, and 144 h, respectively. Summary of the experimental setup, conditions, and experimental checkpoints are described in
Table 1 and
Figure 5, respectively.
4.3. Cell Viability
Cytotoxic effect of FFA, Silybin, and the combination of both was assessed by MTT colorimetric assay at 24, 96, and 144 h. LX2 were plated at 10,000, 5000, and 2500 cells/cm2; Huh7 20,000, 15,000, and 10,000 cells/cm2; and SCC at 15,000, 7500, and 3750 cell/cm2 (to test 24, 96, and 144 h, respectively) in a 48-well culture plate and treated as described before. At the experimental time points, cells were incubated for 1 h with medium containing MTT at the concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. Afterward, the medium was removed and formazan crystals were dissolved in 200 µL of DMSO. One-hundred microliters from each well were moved in a microtiter plate, and optical density (OD) was determined at a wavelength of 562 nm on an Enspire® Multimode Plate Reader (Perkin Elmer).
4.4. RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis, and Gene Expression Analysis by q-PCR
Total RNA was isolated using EuroGOLD RNA Pure according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The total RNA concentration was quantified spectrophotometrically at 260 nm in a Beckman Coulter DU
®730 spectrophotometer (Fullerton, CA, USA) and purity was evaluated by measuring the ratio A260/A280. Total RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kits (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s suggestions in a Thermal Cycler (Gene Amp PCR System 2400, PerkinElmer, Boston, MA, USA). Quantitative PCR was performed in a CFX connectTM system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA USA). All primer pairs were designed using the software Beacon Designer 8.12 (PREMIER Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and were synthesized by Sigma Genosys Ltd. (London Road, UK). Primer sequences are specified in
Table 2. 18S and HPRT were used as reference genes. PCR amplification was performed in 15 μL reaction volume containing 25 ng of cDNA, 1 × iQ SYBR Green Supermix, and 250 nM gene specific sense and antisense primers and 100 nM primers for 18S. The data were analyzed using a Bio-Rad CFX manager (version 3.1).
4.5. Collagen Quantification
After 96 and 144 h of treatment, cells were lysed in AlphaLISA lysis buffer (Perkin Elmer) and stored at −80 °C until use. The cell lysate was diluted 1:10 v/v in Alpha Immunoassay buffer (Perkin Elmer) and collagen content was quantified using COL1A1 AlphaLISA Detection kit (Cat#AL371C, Perkin Elmer) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Results were obtained fitting the data to a doseresponse sigmoidal curve generated with Graph Pad Prism® version 5.01 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) and normalized to the total protein concentration.
4.6. MMP2/9 Activity
Metalloproteinase 2 and 9 activity was tested at 96 and 144 h in the supernatant of treated SCC, Huh7, and LX2 with InnoZymeTM Gelatinase activity assay kit (Cat#CBA003, Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA). Briefly, 30 µL of supernatant was added to a 96-well plate with 60 µL of activation buffer and 10 µL of substrate working solution. After 2 h of incubation at 37 °C, the developed fluorescence was read at 405 nm (excitation wavelength of 320 nm). Obtained data were fitted to a linear standard curve and normalized to the total protein concentration of the respective cell lysate.
4.7. Total Protein Quantification
Total proteins were quantified by fluorescamine, a nonfluorescent molecule that reacts readily with primary amines in amino acids and peptides to form stable, highly fluorescent compounds. Ten microliters of fluorescamine at 4 mg/mL in DMSO was mixed with 40 µL of cell lysate diluted 1:2 v/v. Fluorescence was read at 460 nm (excitation wavelength of 390 nm) in an EnSpire® Multimode Plate Reader (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA USA). Total protein was calculated using a BSA standard curve dilution.
4.8. Quantification of Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)
LX2, Huh7, and SCC were plated in a 96-well plate at the before mentioned cell densities. Cells were exposed for 1 h to FFA and silybin; subsequently, cells were washed with PBS and incubated for 30 min with FBS free culture medium supplemented with 25 mM Hepes/ 20 µM H2DCFDA at 37 °C. Afterward, cells were lysed with fluorescence was quantified by scanning the signal of the attached cells in each well with an Enspire® Multimode Plate Reader (Perkin Elmer) at excitation wavelength 505 nm and emission 525 nm. Fluorescence was normalized by the total proteins present in the cell lysates (µg) assessed using fluorescamine for each sample.
4.9. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using InStat software Version 3.05 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The Student’s t-test was performed for statistical comparison between groups. Value of p < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
GraphPad Prism Version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) software was used to generate graphs.