Next Article in Journal
Discovery of a Potent PLK1-PBD Small-Molecule Inhibitor as an Anticancer Drug Candidate through Structure-Based Design
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Transitional Metals (Mn and Ni) Substitution in LiCoPO4 Olivines
Previous Article in Journal
Combination of Lactobacillus plantarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae DV10 as Starter Culture to Produce Mango Slurry: Microbiological, Chemical Parameters and Antioxidant Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Separation of H2 from CO2 Using a ZIF-8 Membrane by Molecular Simulation and Maxwell-Stefan Model

1
Department of Chemical Engineering, Ilam University, Ilam 69315-516, Iran
2
Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia 7166-93187, Iran
3
Institute on Membrane Technology of the Italian National Research Council (CNR-ITM), via P. Bucci cubo 17/C, 87036 Rende (CS), Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(23), 4350; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234350
Submission received: 28 October 2019 / Revised: 21 November 2019 / Accepted: 27 November 2019 / Published: 28 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Materials for Energy Storage)

Abstract

:
The purification of H2-rich streams using membranes represents an important separation process, particularly important in the viewpoint of pre-combustion CO2 capture. In this study, the separation of H2 from a mixture containing H2 and CO2 using a zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF)-8 membrane is proposed from a theoretical point of view. For this purpose, the adsorption and diffusion coefficients of H2 and CO2 were considered by molecular simulation. The adsorption of these gases followed the Langmuir model, and the diffusion coefficient of H2 was much higher than that of CO2. Then, using the Maxwell–Stefan model, the H2 and CO2 permeances and H2/CO2 permselectivities in the H2–CO2 mixtures were evaluated. Despite the fact that adsorption of CO2 was higher than H2, owing to the simultaneous interference of adsorption and diffusion processes in the membrane, H2 permeation was more pronounced than CO2. The modeling results showed that, for a ZIF-8 membrane, the H2/CO2 permselectivity for the H2–CO2 binary mixture 80/20 ranges between 28 and 32 at ambient temperature.

1. Introduction

Energy has become one of the major concerns in the world due to the growing oil price and the concomitant depletion of fossil fuels, involving the need for greener processes and the use of renewable sources. Therefore, the search for renewable energy has attracted the attention of the scientific community [1,2]. In particular, H2 is seen as a pollution-free energy carrier, possessing high energy density and heat content 3 to 4 times higher than coal and natural gas. This simple element is currently used in chemical industries, particularly in methanol and ammonia production, food processing, and metallurgy, and for heating and electric power generation, in industrial boilers [3,4,5,6]. Unfortunately, H2 is not naturally available as a pure gas on the Earth and, at this time, approximately 90% of the total H2 production comes from non-renewable sources such as natural gas and coal, responsible for consistent greenhouse gas emissions [1,6]. Currently, H2 is produced predominantly by the natural gas steam reforming reaction in conventional reformers, followed by the water–gas shift (WGS) reaction, which provides a H2-rich stream containing also CO2 and other impurities [7]. Afterwards, these impurities must be removed in order to obtain high purity H2 for applications and downstream processes [6].
Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) as well as cryogenic and membrane separations have been considered effective methods to purify H2 from other gases such as CO2 [8,9]. In the framework of H2 purification by membrane technology and among the various types of membrane solutions, zeolite membranes possess special properties such as physical stability, appropriate chemical resistance, etc. [10]. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), as a new family of microporous membrane materials, are organized by a network of transition metal cations or clusters bonded by organic ligands [11]. Hence, MOFs have become interesting membrane materials, useful in applications such as gas separation, catalysis, and product storage, due to their feasibility in altering pore size and adsorption affinities by functionalizing the linked molecules as well as the porosity and functional groups [12,13]. Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) are an important class of materials that can be categorized as MOFs. ZIF membranes include ZIF-7, ZIF-8, ZIF-22, ZIF- 90, ZIF-95, and ZIF-100, which show interesting performance in gas separation applications [14,15,16]. In particular, the separation performances of propylene/propane mixtures were investigated through a ZIF-8 membrane fabricated by a facile hydrothermal seeded growth method by Pan et al. [14]. They found that the ZIF-8 membrane had significant separation performance for a wide range of propylene/propane binary mixtures, showing high thermal and long-term stability, and high reproducibility. Lai et al. [15] studied the permeation of CO2/CH4 through a ZIF-8 membrane based on a combination of generalized Maxwell–Stefan, viscous flow, and Knudsen diffusion models, considering the gas diffusivity, support resistance, and intercrystalline pores of the membrane layer. They found that the simulated results and the experimental gas permeation data were well fitted and consistent with the physical characterizations, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Furthermore, the transport and diffusivities of hydrocarbons in ZIF-8 as a function of temperature were studied using molecular simulation methods via dynamically corrected transition state theory (dcTST) [16]. A comparison of the determined diffusivity results with experimental data demonstrated considerable agreement for all the molecules. Chokbunpiam et al. [17] evaluated the adsorption, diffusion, and permeation of the guest molecules in the C2H6/ZIF-8 system and the influence of the diffusing C2H6 molecules in the ZIF-8 membrane by molecular dynamic simulation. They found that two effects simultaneously include the decrease in window size of the ZIF-8 membrane at higher C2H6 loadings, while exerting forces within the cavity by the guest molecules at higher loadings, pressing a given probe molecule toward the window and leading to a weak self-diffusivity dependence on the concentration of guest molecules.
From the perspective of pre-combustion capture and related zeolite membrane application, the present theoretical study aimed to study the adsorption and diffusion coefficients of H2 and CO2 in a ZIF-8 membrane, calculated by using molecular simulations. Then, using the results of molecular simulations and the Maxwell–Stefan model, the membrane permeance of H2 and CO2 binary mixtures was also investigated and is discussed below.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Molecular Simulation Details

The Materials Studio software (BIOVIA, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for the molecular simulation of adsorption and diffusion of H2 and CO2 in a ZIF-8-based membrane. The universal force field was used in all the simulations. The structure of the simulated ZIF-8-based membrane of this study was assumed to consist of a supercell with dimensions of 34 × 34 × 34 Å, as shown in Figure 1. The sorption modulus was used to simulate the adsorption of the components and the Monte Carlo method with periodic boundary conditions was applied to simulate the adsorption on the ZIF-8-based membrane. The cutoff distance in the calculations was 12.5 Å, electrostatic and van der Waals terms were Ewald and atom-based, respectively. The number of calculations was up to a balance of 1,000,000 stages and production steps of about 106. Considering that the driving force for the movement of adsorbed molecules between phases is expressed by their fugacity, the Molecular Dynamics simulation was used to investigate the diffusion of the components in the structure of the ZIF-8-based membrane. First, 10 molecules of a component were located in a ZIF-8 membrane cell by the sorption module. Then, the system was minimized using the conjugate gradient and steepest descent methods. Molecular Dynamics was carried out 1000 ps NVT at 298 K to reach the equilibrium state. The diffusion coefficients were derived from the linear least-square fits of the plots of the mean square displacement (MSD) of molecules versus time.

2.2. Maxwell–Stefan Model

The transport through the ZIF-8-based membranes was demonstrated as adsorption on the external surface, transport into the pores, intercrystalline diffusion, transport out of the pores, and desorption. Different mechanisms may contribute to the selectivity of the ZIF-8 membranes; indeed, in their pores, adsorption equilibrium and diffusion play a major role for some molecules and in particular conditions, whereas for others the molecular sieve effects turn out to be dominant. Considerable progress has been made during the last decade in developing a general theory for describing the diffusion of gaseous mixtures in zeolite membranes, using the Maxwell–Stefan (M–S) formulation [18,19], which is considered an indispensable model for simulating the transient transport across zeolites membranes, to be strongly preferred to other modeling approaches (for example, the simple Fick model) [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Therefore, it is now widely accepted that, for a proper formulation, it can be applied for describing the gas diffusion in zeolite membranes. It is also generally accepted that the fundamentally correct approach is related to the fluxes (Ni), defined in terms of the cross-sectional area of the membrane, and to the chemical potential gradients (∇µi), by using the M–S equation, shown as Equation (1) below [27]:
ρ Θ i R T μ i = j = 1 j i n Θ j N i Θ i N j Θ i , s a t Θ j , s a t Đ i j + N i Θ i , s a t Đ i .
The friction is the result of the interactions between adsorbed molecules and between a molecule and the pore wall. The parameters Đij and Đi are the Maxwell–Stefan surface diffusivities and represent inverse friction factors between molecules and between molecules and pore wall, respectively, whereas Θi is the molecule loading expressed in molecules per unit cell and Θi,sat is the saturation loading. The interchange coefficient Đij is calculated as a logarithmic average of the single-component M-S diffusivities, Equation (2):
Đ i j = [ Đ i ] θ i θ i + θ j [ Đ j ] θ j θ i + θ j .
The fractional occupancies are defined by Equation (3):
θ = q i q i s a t = Θ i Θ i s a t ,
where qi is the molar loading of species i and qi,sat is its saturation loading.
The chemical potential gradient may be expressed in terms of the fractional occupancy gradient via thermodynamic correction factors Γij, defined by Equations (4) and (5):
θ i R T μ i = j = 1 n Γ i j θ j ,
Γ i j = θ i l n p i θ j .
The adsorption of components in equilibrium with the ZIF-8-based membrane can be described by a Langmuir adsorption isotherm equation (Equation (6):
Θ = b Θ s a t P     1 + b P ,
where P is the pressure (Pa) and b represents the temperature-dependent sorption strengths (expressed in Pa−1) [25].

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the simulated adsorption isotherms for H2 and CO2 on zeolite ZIF-8 at 298 K and their comparisons with the experimental isotherms from the literature [28,29]. The agreement between the simulated isotherms and the experimental results coming from the literature of H2 and CO2 adsorption in the entire range of pressure studied in this work is reported in Figure 2a,b. On the one hand, the molecular simulations of H2 adsorption match quite well the experimental results apart from the range of pressures higher than 2500 Pa where a certain disagreement is evident, as is seen in Figure 2a. On the other hand, the molecular simulations of CO2 adsorption match quite well the experimental data from the literature at lower pressures, whereas at higher pressures a clear deviation from the simulated isotherms is evident toward lower loadings, as shown in Figure 2b. This occurs because, at higher pressures, the system is far from the ideal state and the non-ideal terms are not incorporated into the system, with a consequent disagreement. Furthermore, at high pressures, some structural features such as the simulated surface area, pore volume of the adsorbent and force field parameters can have an influence on the agreement within experimental and modeling data. However, both figures indicate the validity of the simulation results using the universal force field.
In Figure 3, simulation results of H2 and CO2 adsorption on the ZIF-8-based membrane were fitted by using a Langmuir model. As shown, there is a good agreement between the former model and the molecular simulation results. In particular, the adsorption of H2 and CO2 on the ZIF-8-based membrane looks like a monolayer adsorption. The model parameters derived from the fitting process are shown in Table 1.
MSDs were evaluated from trajectories that are carried out through the periodic boundaries [30]. Figure 4 displays the MSD as a function of time for both H2 and CO2 molecule diffusion in the ZIF-8-based membrane at 298 K and for a set loading of 10 molecules/cell. The relationship between the observed MSD versus time is linear, with a very good approximation, as also observed in other works in the literature [31,32].
This indicates that the normal diffusion occurs at this time scale. The calculated diffusion coefficient at 298 K for a set loading of 10 molecules is equal to 2.62 × 10−8 for H2 and 1.71 × 10−10 m2⋅s−1 for CO2, respectively. In both cases, it is calculated as the slope of the plot MSD versus time, as is shown in Figure 4. These values are in good agreement with reported experimental diffusion coefficients in the literature [28,29] (Table 1). Table 2 shows further H2 and CO2 diffusion coefficients at 298 K of other membranes beside the ZIF-8 one of this study.
As shown, in most of the cases reported in the table, H2 and CO2 diffusion coefficients of the ZIF-8 membrane are higher than the other ones from the literature, apart from the H2 diffusion from [34] and the CO2 diffusion from [33].
The molecular simulation results of the adsorption and diffusion of H2 and CO2 in the ZIF-8-based membrane showed that the latter adsorption was much higher than that of H2. On the other hand, the H2 diffusion coefficient in the ZIF-8-based membrane was much higher than that of CO2. Since the permeance of these components across the ZIF-8 membrane depends on their adsorption and diffusion properties, the Maxwell–Stefan model was adopted for investigating these phenomena.
In Figure 5, the permeances of H2 and CO2 as a binary mixture (H2/CO2 molar ratio = 70/30) are shown at a temperature of 298K and different pressures. It is observable that H2 permeance is higher than CO2, particularly at lower pressures, making the ZIF-8-based membrane suitable for H2 separation from CO2. H2/CO2 membrane selectivities for various H2–CO2 mixtures at different molar ratio were simulated as a function of pressure at 298 K, as seen in Figure 6. It can be observed that by increasing the H2 concentration, the H2/CO2 selectivity increased as a consequence of a higher hydrogen permeation driving force across the membrane. Meanwhile, the CO2 molecule density was reduced, causing their adsorption decrease in the competition with other molecules. Furthermore, at lower pressures, H2/CO2 permselectivity was higher because CO2 showed lower adsorption at low pressures and less effect on permeance; this mode is more favorable for hydrogen selection. As the best result of this theoretical work, Figure 6 shows that the highest simulated H2/CO2 permselectivity was reached with the H2–CO2 mixture showing a H2/CO2 ratio equal to 80/20, with values ranging between 28 and 32, although at a pressure higher than 300 kPa the permselectivity value showed a constant trend around 28.

4. Conclusions

The separation of H2 from CO2 was theoretically investigated by using a ZIF-8 membrane. The adsorption and diffusion contributions of H2 and CO2 were studied by using molecular simulations. The ZIF-8-based membrane showed a strong tendency to adsorb CO2, whereas the H2 diffusion coefficient was much higher than that of CO2. By combining the molecular simulation results with the Maxwell–Stefan model, the theoretical results demonstrated that the ZIF-8 membrane possesses a H2/CO2 permselectivity higher than 30 at relatively lower pressure (below 300 kPa), while it decreases raising the pressure. This effect is due to the progressively reduced CO2 adsorption contribution at lower pressure. However, this trend was theoretically confirmed in all the H2–CO2 binary mixtures considered in this work.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and original draft preparation, B.B.; Software and analysis, A.G., editing, K.G.; writing—review and editing, A.I.; editing, A.B.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Handayani, K.; Krozer, Y.; Filatova, T. From fossil fuels to renewables: An analysis of long-term scenarios considering technological learning. Energy Policy 2019, 127, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dunn, S. Hydrogen futures: Toward a sustainable energy system. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2002, 27, 235–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. US Department of Energy. Hydrogen Production Pathways. 2017. Available online: http://energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-production-pathways (accessed on 31 October 2019).
  4. Biegler, T. The hydrogen economy. Skeptic 2005, 25, 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  5. Armaroli, N.; Balzani, V. The Hydrogen Issue. ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Iulianelli, A.; Longo, T.; Liguori, S.; Basile, A. Production of hydrogen via glycerol steam reforming in a Pd-Ag membrane reactor over Co-Al2O3 catalyst. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 5, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Iulianelli, A.; Liguori, S.; Huang, Y.; Basile, A. Model biogas steam reforming in a thin Pd-supported membrane reactor to generate clean hydrogen for fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2015, 273, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chou, C.-T.; Chen, F.-H.; Huang, Y.-J.; Yang, H.-S. Carbon dioxide capture and hydrogen purification from synthesis gas by pressure swing adsorption. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2013, 32, 1855–1860. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bredesen, R.; Kumakiri, I.; Peters, T. CO2 capture with membrane systems. In Membrane Operations; Chapter 9; Drioli, E., Giorno, L., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2009; pp. 195–220. [Google Scholar]
  10. Verweij, H.; Lin, Y.; Dong, J. Microporous silica and zeolite membranes for hydrogen purification. MRS Bull. 2006, 31, 756–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, Z.; Ma, X.; Kasik, A.; Li, Z.; Lin, Y.S. Gas separation properties of Metal Organic Framework (MOF-5) membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 1102–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bux, H.; Chmelik, C.; van Baten, J.M.; Krishna, R.; Caro, J. Novel MOF-membrane for molecular sieving predicted by IR-diffusion studies and molecular modeling. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 4741–4743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fu, J.; Das, S.; Xing, G.; Ben, T.; Valtchev, V.; Qiu, S. Fabrication of COF-MOF composite membranes and their highly selective separation of H2/CO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 7673–7680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pan, Y.; Li, T.; Lestari, G.; Lai, Z. Effective separation of propylene/propane binary mixtures by ZIF-8 membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 390, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lai, L.S.; Yeong, Y.F.; Lau, K.K.; Shariff, A.M. CO2 and CH4 permeation through zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF)-8 membrane synthesized via in situ layer-by-layer growth: An experimental and modeling study. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 79098–79106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Verploegh, R.J.; Nair, S.; Sholl, D.S. Temperature and loading-dependent diffusion of light hydrocarbons in ZIF-8 as predicted through fully flexible molecular simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 15760–15771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chokbunpiam, T.; Chanajaree, R.; Saengsawang, O.; Reimann, S.; Chmelik, C.; Fritzsche, S.; Caro, J.; Remsungnen, T.; Hannongbua, S. The importance of lattice flexibility for the migration of ethane in ZIF-8: Molecular dynamics simulations. Microp. Mesop. Mater. 2013, 174, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Krishna, R.; Wesselingh, J. The Maxwell-Stefan approach to mass transfer. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1997, 52, 861–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kapteijn, F.; Moulijn, J.; Krishna, R. The generalized Maxwell–Stefan model for diffusion in zeolites: Sorbate molecules with different saturation loadings. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2000, 55, 2923–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Krishna, R.; van den Broeke, L.J.P. The Maxwell-Stefan description of mass transport across zeolite membranes. Chem. Eng. J. 1995, 57, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kapteijn, F.; Bakker, W.J.W.; Zheng, G.; Poppe, J.; Moulijn, J.A. Permeation and separation of light hydrocarbons through a silicalite-1 membrane. Application of the generalized Maxwell-Stefan equations. Chem. Eng. J. 1995, 57, 145–153. [Google Scholar]
  22. Krishna, R. Multicomponent surface diffusion of adsorbed species: A description based on the generalized Maxwell-Stefan equations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1990, 45, 1779–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bakker, W.J.W.; Zheng, G.; Kapteijn, F.; Kakkee, M.; Moulijn, J.A. Single and Multicomponent Transport through Metal-Supported MFI Zeolite Membranes; Weijnen, M.P.C., Drinkenburg, A.A.H., Eds.; Precision Process Technology: Kluwer, The Netherlands, 1993; pp. 425–436. [Google Scholar]
  24. Krishna, R. Problems and pitfalls in the use of the Fick formulation for intraparticle diffusion. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1993, 48, 845–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rahmati, M. A molecular simulation of natural gas dehydration by 3A zeolite nanostructure. Iran. J. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 2017, 6, 68–78. [Google Scholar]
  26. Cheng, P.; Hu, Y.H. H2O-functionalized zeolitic Zn (2-methylimidazole) 2 framework (ZIF-8) for H2 storage. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 21866–21872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, D.; Wu, Y.; Xia, Q.; Li, Z.; Xi, H. Experimental and molecular simulation studies of CO2 adsorption on zeolitic imidazolate frameworks: ZIF-8 and amine-modified ZIF-8. Adsorption 2013, 19, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hertäg, L.; Bux, H.; Caro, J.; Chmelik, C.; Remsungnen, T.; Knauth, M.; Fritzsche, S. Diffusion of CH4 and H2 in ZIF-8. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 377, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pusch, A.-K.; Splith, T.; Moschkowitz, L.; Karmakar, S.; Biniwale, R.; Sant, M.; Suffritti, G.B.; Demontis, P.; Cravillon, J.; Pantatosaki, E. NMR studies of carbon dioxide and methane self-diffusion in ZIF-8 at elevated gas pressures. Adsorption 2012, 18, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Demontis, P.; Gulín-González, J.; Jobic, H.; Suffritti, G.B. Diffusion of water in zeolites Na A and NaCa A: A molecular dynamics simulation study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 18612–18621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Du, X. Molecular-Dynamics Simulation of self-diffusion of molecular hydrogen in x-type zeolite. J. Phys. Chem. 2013, 2013, 545367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khanmohammadi, H.; Bayati, B.; Rahbar-Shahrouzi, J.; Babaluo, A.-A.; Ghorbani, A. Molecular simulation of the ion exchange behavior of Cu2+, Cd2+ and Pb2+ ions on different zeolites exchanged with sodium. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zito, P.F.; Caravella, A.; Brunetti, A.; Drioli, E.; Barbieri, G. Knudsen and surface diffusion competing for gas permeation inside silicalite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 523, 456–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bakker, W.J.W.; van den Broeke, L.J.P.; Kapteijn, F.; Moulijn, J.A. Temperature dependence of one-component permeation through a silicalite-1 membrane. AIChE J. 1997, 43, 2203–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zito, P.F.; Caravella, A.; Brunetti, A.; Drioli, E.; Barbieri, G. Discrimination among gas translation, surface and Knudsen diffusion in permeation through zeolite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 564, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Van den Bergh, J.; Tihaya, A.; Kapteijn, F. High temperature permeation and separation characteristics of an all-silica DDR zeolite membrane. Microp. Mesop. Mater. 2010, 132, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Caravella, A.; Zito, P.F.; Brunetti, A.; Drioli, E.; Barbieri, G. A novel modelling approach to surface and Knudsen multicomponent diffusion through NaY zeolite membranes. Microp. Mesop. Mater. 2016, 235, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zito, P.F.; Brunetti, A.; Caravella, A.; Drioli, E.; Barbieri, G. Mutual influence in permeation of CO2-containing mixtures through a SAPO-34 membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the supercell of the ZIF-8 structure.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the supercell of the ZIF-8 structure.
Molecules 24 04350 g001
Figure 2. Comparisons between the simulated isotherm adsorption and experimental results from the literature on the ZIF-8-based membrane at 298 K: (a) H2 (experimental results from [26]) and (b) CO2 (experimental results from [27]).
Figure 2. Comparisons between the simulated isotherm adsorption and experimental results from the literature on the ZIF-8-based membrane at 298 K: (a) H2 (experimental results from [26]) and (b) CO2 (experimental results from [27]).
Molecules 24 04350 g002aMolecules 24 04350 g002b
Figure 3. Langmuir model fitting to the molecular simulation results of H2 and CO2 uptake on the ZIF-8-based membrane at 298 K.
Figure 3. Langmuir model fitting to the molecular simulation results of H2 and CO2 uptake on the ZIF-8-based membrane at 298 K.
Molecules 24 04350 g003
Figure 4. Mean square displacement (MSD) as a function of time for both H2 and CO2 molecule diffusion in the ZIF-8-based membrane at 298 K and for a set loading of 10 molecules/cell.
Figure 4. Mean square displacement (MSD) as a function of time for both H2 and CO2 molecule diffusion in the ZIF-8-based membrane at 298 K and for a set loading of 10 molecules/cell.
Molecules 24 04350 g004aMolecules 24 04350 g004b
Figure 5. Permeance of H2 and CO2 in a binary mixture H2/CO2 = 70/30 for the ZIF-8-based membrane at 298 K and as a function of pressure.
Figure 5. Permeance of H2 and CO2 in a binary mixture H2/CO2 = 70/30 for the ZIF-8-based membrane at 298 K and as a function of pressure.
Molecules 24 04350 g005
Figure 6. H2/CO2 selectivity of the ZIF-8 membrane for the binary H2–CO2 mixture at 298 K and different H2/CO2 molar ratios.
Figure 6. H2/CO2 selectivity of the ZIF-8 membrane for the binary H2–CO2 mixture at 298 K and different H2/CO2 molar ratios.
Molecules 24 04350 g006
Table 1. Obtained Langmuir isotherm parameters and diffusion coefficient of H2 and CO2 on the ZIF-8-based membrane at 298 K.
Table 1. Obtained Langmuir isotherm parameters and diffusion coefficient of H2 and CO2 on the ZIF-8-based membrane at 298 K.
ComponentLangmuir ModelR2Diffusion Coefficient (m2/s)
This WorkLiterature
H2Θs = 356; b = 4.02 × 10−5 0.9992.62 × 10−82.5 × 10−8 [28]
CO2Θs = 127; b = 1.31 × 10−30.9981.71 × 10−102.2 × 10−10 [29]
Table 2. H2 and CO2 diffusion coefficients at 298 K for the ZIF-8 membrane of this study and those of other membranes from the literature.
Table 2. H2 and CO2 diffusion coefficients at 298 K for the ZIF-8 membrane of this study and those of other membranes from the literature.
DH2 [m2/s]DCO2 [m2/s]Membrane Ref.
2.62 × 10−81.71 × 10−10ZIF-8This work
1.73 × 10−85.22 × 10−10Silicalite[33]
5.06 × 10−81.45 × 10−10Silicalite[34]
1.33 × 10−98.82 × 10−11DDR zeolite[35]
5.01 × 10−91.58 × 10−11DDR zeolite[36]
5.79 × 10−104.12 × 10−11NaY zeolite[37]
1.27 × 10−91.23 × 10−10SAPO-34[38]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bayati, B.; Ghorbani, A.; Ghasemzadeh, K.; Iulianelli, A.; Basile, A. Study on the Separation of H2 from CO2 Using a ZIF-8 Membrane by Molecular Simulation and Maxwell-Stefan Model. Molecules 2019, 24, 4350. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234350

AMA Style

Bayati B, Ghorbani A, Ghasemzadeh K, Iulianelli A, Basile A. Study on the Separation of H2 from CO2 Using a ZIF-8 Membrane by Molecular Simulation and Maxwell-Stefan Model. Molecules. 2019; 24(23):4350. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234350

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bayati, Behrouz, Asma Ghorbani, Kamran Ghasemzadeh, Adolfo Iulianelli, and Angelo Basile. 2019. "Study on the Separation of H2 from CO2 Using a ZIF-8 Membrane by Molecular Simulation and Maxwell-Stefan Model" Molecules 24, no. 23: 4350. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24234350

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop