Next Article in Journal
Hybrid Ionic Silver and Magnetite Microgels Nanocomposites for Efficient Removal of Methylene Blue
Next Article in Special Issue
The Bioreduction of Selenite under Anaerobic and Alkaline Conditions Analogous to Those Expected for a Deep Geological Repository System
Previous Article in Journal
1,2-Benzenedithiol and Toluene-3,4-dithiol Arsenic(III) Complexes—Synthesis, Structure, Spectroscopic Characterization and Toxicological Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of By-Product from Botryosphaeria rhodina MAMB-05 as an Effective Biosorbent of Pb(II)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Copper Ions Removal from Water using A2B3 Type Hyperbranched Poly(amidoamine) Hydrogel Particles

Department of Chemistry, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(21), 3866; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24213866
Submission received: 28 September 2019 / Revised: 18 October 2019 / Accepted: 24 October 2019 / Published: 26 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heavy Metals Removal from Contaminated Soil and Water)

Abstract

:
Micrometer-sized hyperbranched poly(amidoamine) (hPAMAM) particles are prepared with a simple A2B3 type Aza–Michael addition reaction between aminoethylpiperazine (AEP) and methylenebisacrylamide (MBA) in an inverse suspension polymerization condition. The synthesized particles exhibited surprisingly high Cu2+ sorption capacity (0.223g/g) for a solid-type absorbent. In addition to the high sorption ability of the particle, its simple synthetic process and convenience, due to its micrometer-sized spherical shape and recyclability, make it a practical and attractive absorbent for heavy metal ion removal from aqueous solutions.

1. Introduction

The heavy metal ion pollution of water has been a long-pending problem since the industrial revolution. Although acute heavy metal ion poisoning accidents have disappeared, it is still an ongoing trouble these days. For example, arsenic has been confirmed as a typical toxic metal ion causing abdominal pain and cancer in the past [1], and a high level of arsenic has been found at Ganges, Bangladesh, in 1998 [2], and also in China in 2013 [3]. Another notorious toxic heavy metal ion is mercury. The usage and the disposal of mercury have been curtailed after the disaster in Minamata in 1959, but a high concentration of mercury still exists in several oceans [4] and mercury-accumulated fishes are often found in the oceans [5]. In recent decades, copper has becomes one of the popular technology metals in the industrial field. It is widely used from electrical wires to integrated circuits and thin-film solar cells [6], but copper ions show toxicity to humans, living organisms, and the environment [7]. From this point of view, the removal of the heavy metal ions that are poisoning the aqueous environment is an issue which needs a continuous research effort, in addition to the restriction of the use of toxic heavy metals.
To address the removal of heavy metal ions from water, numerous methods have been suggested, such as precipitation [8], reverse osmosis [9], ion exchange [10,11,12], and adsorption [13]. One of the interesting methods is using poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimer as an adsorbent [14,15,16]. Abundant amine functional groups originated from its dendritic nature facilitate heavy metal ion adsorption, resulting in a high adsorption performance. However, PAMAM dendrimer has significant drawbacks. The synthesis of dendrimers is a complicated and time-consuming process to obtain the necessary high molecular weight, and it cannot be separated easily from water, as it needs ultrafiltration because of their nanometer-size hydrodynamic diameters. To overcome these drawbacks several methods, including impregnating/grafting the PAMAM dendrimer onto supports, have been proposed [17,18,19,20,21]. Recently our group suggested a novel method that can overcome the drawbacks of PAMAM dendrimer without supports, utilizing the synthesis of micro-sized gel particles of hyperbranched PAMAM (hPAMAM) [22]. By the slow feeding of one monomer (methylene bisacrylamide, MBA) into the other (ethylenediamine, EDA), highly-branched poly(amidoamine) particles have successfully been obtained in one step. It can be easily separated from water by a micro-size filter and can be produced on a large scale. Interestingly, the synthesized hPAMAM particles show a high sorption capacity of Cu2+, at 0.17 g/g.
In this study, we used an A2B3 type monomer system instead of the previously reported A2B4 type monomer system [22]. By replacing ethylenediamine (EDA) (a B4 type monomer) with 1-(2-aminoethyl)piperazine (AEP) (a B3 type monomer), we intended to reduce the crosslinking density while maintaining structural robustness through the cyclic structure together with the tertiary-amine group in the piperazine moiety, which is expected to improve the metal ion binding behavior of hPAMAM hydrogel particles.

2. Results and Discussion

Aza–Michael addition polymerization between MBA (N,N′-methylenebis acrylamide) and AEP was successfully carried out by following the previously reported method [22]. Because AEP is soluble in water but MBA has a low solubility in water, simple mixing of AEP and MBA in water provides a slow feeding system of MBA into the aqueous solution of AEP. Particle shape can be achieved via inverse suspension polymerization, consisting of water as an aqueous phase and toluene as an organic phase together with span 60 as a water-in-oil (W/O) surfactant. After the polymerization reaches a critical gel point, the aqueous polymer droplets become insoluble gel particles. The polymerization process is depicted in Scheme 1. Synthesized polymers are designated as AEPx/MBAy/span60z, where x and y stand for the monomer feed ratio x:y=[AEP]0:[MBA]0, and z is the weight concentration (%) of span 60 to monomers, respectively. After preparing AEP/MBA/span60 hPAMAM particles, the synthesized hydrogel particles were characterized.
In Figure 1, optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the hPAMAM hydrogel particles obtained with different monomer feed ratios are presented. Since the stoichiometric value of [AEP]:[MBA] is 1:1.5, highly-departed values (under 0.8:1.5 and over 1.4:1.5) cannot induce a gel formation. In all monomer feed ratios employed, the polymer particles were obtained with a spherical shape and size of 50–300 micrometers.
The chemical structure of the polymers was characterized by attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR) spectroscopy (Figure 2a). Amine N-H stretch (3300~3400 cm−1), C-H stretch (2820 cm−1), and amide C=O (1640 cm−1) signals clearly indicate that polymerization was carried out successfully. The signal of 3060 cm−1 is assigned as an overtone of the 1530 cm−1 signal, often found in amide compounds, and not the C=C double bond signal from the unreacted MBA. For further verification, proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectroscopic analysis of the polymer obtained with an AEP MBA 1.2: 1.5 monomer feed ratio was carried out, and the spectrum showed no C=C double bond peak, while the polymer still showed the 3060 cm−1 signal in ATR-IR (Figure S5). Representative thermal gravimetric analysis data are presented in Figure 2b. All polymers showed good thermal stability for nitrogen-containing aliphatic polymers. The temperature of 5% weight loss (Td,5%) was 266 °C on average. This high thermal stability of the hPAMAM particles implies that the polymer network is highly stable without supports such as silica.
The sorption feature of the hyperbranched PAMAM polymers was studied. In general, swelling of a cm-scale hydrogel is presented by volume or length change through swelling. However, synthesized particles were in the range of 50–300 μm, which is quite small compared to macroscopic gels. Therefore, we examined their swelling behavior with the weight change instead of length change. The water swelling ratio of the particles was obtained via the beaker test method with distilled water for 24 h. Because the water uptake was mainly affected by the crosslink density of the polymer hydrogel, the swelling ratio of particles increased with increasing deviation from its stoichiometric value, [AEP]:[MBA]=1:1.5 (detailed information are presented in Figure S1). The maximum swelling ratio was 895% in AEP1.4/MBA1.5/span601, and the minimum swelling ratio was 335% in AEP1/MBA1.5/span601.
Subsequently, the Cu2+ absorption capacity was measured with an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES), by following the concentration change of the CuCl2 solution (1000 ppm) after placing hPAMAM particles in the solution for a certain time. Copper absorption capacities exhibited an expected tendency, proportional to the increase of AEP units. The highest Cu2+ sorption capacity of 0.223 g/g was observed with AEP1.4/MBA1.5/span601, suggesting that the amine functionalities are strongly related to the Cu2+ sorption ability. Noteworthy, 0.223 g/g is quite a high value for a solid-type absorbent and almost quadruple to that of commercial resin, Dowex M4195 (Table 1). In addition, the highest Cu2+ absorption capacity of the AEP-MBA gel is 31% higher than the value of the EDA-MBA hPAMAM particles, which was previously reported by our group [22].
Next, we studied the time-dependent Cu2+ sorption behavior to get information about the sorption rate. Especially, we measured the sorption rate in different particle sizes to understand the heavy metal ion sorption mechanism of hyperbranched PAMAM hydrogel particles (Figure 3). Because the “absorption” process occurs through the whole volume of the particle and not just on the surfaces and “adsorption” occurs on the surfaces, the sorption rate and capacity of the particles with different diameters should provide useful information of its sorption mechanism. The sorption rate of AEP1.2/MBA1.5/span600.5 (Figure 3a, 100–350 nm), AEP1.2/MBA1.5/span601 (Figure 3b, 100–300 nm), and AEP1.2/MBA1.5/span605 (Figure 3c, 20–80 nm) in early stages showed none or negligible differences, although they have a large difference of particle diameters. Additionally, the sorption capacities of three particles showed similar values of about 0.205 g/g (Figure S2), indicating that the surface area is not a crucial factor, and that absorption is the major sorption mechanism of the hPAMAM hydrogel particles. Moreover, the existence of copper inside of the particle has been confirmed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis on a cross-section of the Cu2+-absorbed particle, which supports the absorption mechanism (Table S2).
Another important factor for heavy metal sorbent is desorption. Some strong sorbents showing high sorption capacities have low desorption, requiring additional desorbents such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid(EDTA) [30,31,32,33]. These additional treatment processes limit the usability and applicability of sorbents. To check the desorption ability of synthesized hPAMAM particles, Cu2+ saturated hPAMAM hydrogel particles were treated with 0.1N HCl aqueous solution for 3 h, and then energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis was carried out. It was found that the acid treated PAMAM showed zero copper contents in thye EDX elemental analysis, meaning that complete desorption was made (Figure S4, Table S1).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

1-(2-Aminoethyl)piperazine (AEP), N,N′-Methylenebisacrylamide (MBA), Span 60®, and CuCl2 anhydrous were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MI, USA). Toluene was purchased from Junsei (Japan). All the reactants were used without further purification. Optical microscopy (OM) images were obtained on a Nikon Eclipse ME600 (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images were obtained using a FEI Company Inspect F50 (USA) and a Hitachi SU 8230 (Japan). Energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) was performed with a Hithchi SU 8230 (Hithchi, Tokyo, Japan). Metal ion concentration was measured by an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (Agilent ICP-OES 720, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra were obtained from a Nicolet iS50 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a TGA Q50 (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) in N2 condition.

3.2. Methods

3.2.1. Synthesis of Poly(Amidoamine) Particles

Inverse suspension polymerization was applied to synthesize the polymer particles. Oil phase was prepared in a 50 mL round bottom flask as the suspension stabilizer span 60 (1.0 wt% of the monomers) was dissolved in cyclohexane (12 mL) and heated to 60 °C with vigorous agitation. Methylenebis(acrylamide) (MBA) was placed in a 50 mL round bottom flask with water (6 mL) and heated to 50 °C. AEP was added into the MBA solution. The aqueous mixture was heated at 50 °C for 5–10 min until the two monomers completely dissolved. After the aqueous solution became transparent, it was poured into the oil phase solution and then agitated in 1000 rpm at 60 °C for 12 h. After polymerization, off-white polymer hydrogel particles were produced and these particles were filtered and washed several times with distilled water, acetone and methanol.

3.2.2. Measurement of Copper Ion Absorption Capacity

Stock copper solution was prepared with the initial concentration of copper (Ci) in deionized water. Dry polymer particles were placed in a 20 mL vial with a certain volume of the stock copper solution (V) and kept for 24 h to reach sorption saturation at room temperature. Copper absorbed polymer particles were removed by 0.45 μm Nylon syringe filter, and the filtrate were collected. The concentration of copper in the filtrate (Cf) was determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). Copper ion absorption capacity (A) was calculated from the following equation, Equation (1).
Copper ion absorption capacity (A) = [(Ci − Cf)V/m] (g/g)
where m (mg) is the weight of the dry sample, and V (mL) is the volume of the stock copper solution. Ci and Cf (mg/mL) are the initial and filtrate copper ion concentrations, respectively. The sorption rate is defined as the copper sorption amount (g/g) divided by sorption time (min).

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, micro-sized hPAMAM hydrogel particles consisting of AEP and MBA were successfully synthesized by a simple A2B3 type Aza–Michael addition, via inverse suspension polymerization. The synthesized particles showed a high absorption capacity of Cu2+ regardless of its diameter, as high as 0.223 g/g, which is 31% higher than ethylenediamine-based hPAMAM particles and 412% of the commercial sorbent Dowex M4195. High sorption capacity, easy desorption at mild conditions, and handy micrometer-sized particle diameters make these hydrogel particles useful materials for a practically efficient absorption system e.g., a packed column. Amine and amido groups can bind not only copper but also other metals, e.g., cadmium. Further investigation on this proposed polymer sorbent can be expanded, for its use as a high-performance sorbent for various heavy metal ions.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/24/21/3866/s1, Figure S1. Water swelling ratio of AEPx/MBA1.5/span601, Figure S2. Cu2+ absorption for different surfactant conditions (z = 0.5, 1, 2, 5 in AEP1.2/MBA1.5/span60z, absorption time was 24h), Figure S3. Cu2+ absorption saturation test (used polymer: AEP1.2/MBA1.5/span601), Figure S4. Images of AEP1.2/MBA1.5/span601 in absorption and desorption process, Figure S5. 1H-NMR and IR spectra of AEP1.2/MBA1.5 polymer, Table S1. Elemental analysis of Copper by EDX spectroscopy, Table S2. Elemental analysis of Copper on surface and cross-section of the particles by EDX.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.C., Y.E., S.L., and S.Y.K.; formal analysis, H.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.C.; writing—review and editing, S.Y.K.; visualization, H.C.; supervision, S.Y.K.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015R1A2A1A10055222 and NRF-2019R1H1A2039753).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kapaj, S.; Peterson, H.; Liber, K.; Bhattacharya, P. Human health effects from chronic arsenic poisoning—A review. J. Environ. Sci. Heal.–Part A Toxic/Hazardous Subst. Environ. Eng. 2006, 41, 2399–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Acharyya, S.K.; Chakraborty, P.; Lahiri, S.; Raymahashay, B.C.; Guha, S.; Bhowmik, A. Arsenic poisoning in the Ganges delta. Nature 1999, 401, 545–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rodríguez-lado, L.; Sun, G.; Berg, M.; Zhang, Q.; Xue, H.; Zheng, Q.; Johnson, C.A. Groundwater Arsenic Contamination Throughout China. Science 2013, 341, 866–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gworek, B.; Bemowska-Kałabun, O.; Kijeńska, M.; Wrzosek-Jakubowska, J. Mercury in Marine and Oceanic Waters—A Review. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2016, 227, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Peterson, S.A.; Van Sickle, J.; Herlihy, A.T.; Hughes, R.M. Mercury concentration in fish from streams and rivers throughout the western United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kotte, M.R.; Kuvarega, A.T.; Cho, M.; Mamba, B.B.; Diallo, M.S. Mixed Matrix PVDF Membranes With in Situ Synthesized PAMAM Dendrimer-Like Particles: A New Class of Sorbents for Cu(II) Recovery from Aqueous Solutions by Ultrafiltration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 9431–9442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)—Toxicology Profile for Copper. Available online: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp132.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2019).
  8. Charerntanyarak, L. Heavy Metals Removal by Chemical Coagulation and Precipitation. Water. Sci. Technol. 1999, 39, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bakalár, T.; Búgel, M.; Gajdošová, L. Heavy metal removal using reverse osmosis. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2009, 14, 250–253. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dąbrowski, A.; Hubicki, Z.; Podkościelny, P.; Robens, E. Selective removal of the heavy metal ions from waters and industrial wastewaters by ion-exchange method. Chemosphere 2004, 56, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alyüz, B.; Veli, S. Kinetics and equilibrium studies for the removal of nickel and zinc from aqueous solutions by ion exchange resins. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 167, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Z.; Feng, Y.; Hao, X.; Huang, W.; Feng, X. A novel potential-responsive ion exchange film system for heavy metal removal. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 10263–10272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Barakat, M.A. New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab. J. Chem. 2011, 4, 361–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Diallo, M.S.; Balogh, L.; Shafagati, A.; Johnson, J.H.; Goddard, W.A.; Tomalia, D.A. Poly(amidoamine) dendrimers: A new class of high capacity chelating agents for Cu(II) ions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 820–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Diallo, M.S.; Christie, S.; Swaminathan, P.; Johnson, J.H.; Goddard, W.A. Dendrimer enhanced ultrafiltration. 1. Recovery of Cu(II) from aqueous solutions using PAMAM dendrimers with ethylene diamine core and terminal NH 2 groups. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 1366–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, L.; Russell, D.H.; Zhao, M.; Crooks, R.M. Characterization of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers and their complexes with Cu2+ by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 3567–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Song, X.; Niu, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, J.; Chen, H. Adsorption of Hg(II) and Ag(I) from fuel ethanol by silica gel supported sulfur-containing PAMAM dendrimers: Kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamics. Fuel 2017, 206, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Niu, Y.; Yang, J.; Qu, R.; Gao, Y.; Du, N.; Chen, H.; Sun, C.; Wang, W. Synthesis of Silica-Gel-Supported Sulfur-Capped PAMAM Dendrimers for Efficient Hg(II) Adsorption: Experimental and DFT Study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 3679–3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, F.; Wang, B.; He, S.; Man, R. Preparation of Graphene-Oxide/Polyamidoamine Dendrimers and Their Adsorption Properties toward Some Heavy Metal Ions. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2014, 59, 1719–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, X.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, L.; Song, B.; Li, M.; Zeng, G.; Tan, X.; Cai, X.; Ding, Y. Adsorption of Cu(II), Pb(II), and Cd(II) ions from acidic aqueous solutions by diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-modified magnetic graphene oxide. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2017, 62, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hayati, B.; Maleki, A.; Najafi, F.; Daraei, H.; Gharibi, F.; McKay, G. Super high removal capacities of heavy metals (Pb2+ and Cu2+) using CNT dendrimer. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 336, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, S.; Eom, Y.; Park, J.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.Y. Micro-hydrogel Particles Consisting of Hyperbranched Polyamidoamine for the Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Water. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hur, J.; Shin, J.; Yoo, J.; Seo, Y.S. Competitive adsorption of metals onto magnetic graphene oxide: Comparison with other carbonaceous adsorbents. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Meng, Q.; Liu, J.; Jiang, Y.; Teng, Q. Branched Polyethyleneimine-Functionalized Polystyrene Resin: Preparation and Adsorption of Cu2+. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2019, 64, 2618–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mohammadnezhad, G.; Moshiri, P.; Dinari, M.; Steiniger, F. In situ synthesis of nanocomposite materials based on modified-mesoporous silica MCM-41 and methyl methacrylate for copper (II) adsorption from aqueous solution. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2019, 16, 1491–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dinari, M.; Mohammadnezhad, G.; Soltani, R. Fabrication of poly(methyl methacrylate)/silica KIT-6 nanocomposites via in situ polymerization approach and their application for removal of Cu2+ from aqueous solution. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 11419–11429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiang, X.; An, Q.D.; Xiao, Z.Y.; Zhai, S.R.; Shi, Z. Versatile core/shell-like alginate@polyethylenimine composites for efficient removal of multiple heavy metal ions (Pb2+, Cu2+, CrO42-): Batch and fixed-bed studies. Mater. Res. Bull. 2019, 118, 110526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Igberase, E.; Osifo, P.; Ofomaja, A. The adsorption of copper (II) ions by polyaniline graft chitosan beads from aqueous solution: Equilibrium, kinetic and desorption studies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fan, C.; Li, K.; He, Y.; Wang, Y.; Qian, X.; Jia, J. Evaluation of magnetic chitosan beads for adsorption of heavy metal ions. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 627, 1396–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Deng, L.; Su, Y.; Su, H.; Wang, X.; Zhu, X. Sorption and desorption of lead (II) from wastewater by green algae Cladophora fascicularis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 143, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gupta, V.K.; Rastogi, A. Sorption and desorption studies of chromium(VI) from nonviable cyanobacterium Nostoc muscorum biomass. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hammaini, A.; González, F.; Ballester, A.; Blázquez, M.L.; Muñoz, J.A. Biosorption of heavy metals by activated sludge and their desorption characteristics. J. Environ. Manage. 2007, 84, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jeon, C.; Kwang, H.P. Adsorption and desorption characteristics of mercury(II) ions using aminated chitosan bead. Water Res. 2005, 39, 3938–3944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of hyperbranched poly(amidoamine) particles from 1-(2-aminoethyl)piperazine (AEP) and N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of hyperbranched poly(amidoamine) particles from 1-(2-aminoethyl)piperazine (AEP) and N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide.
Molecules 24 03866 sch001
Figure 1. Optical microscopy (OM) images of hyperbranched poly(amidoamine) particles obtained with the following monomer feed ratio; AEPx/MBA1.5/span601. (a) x = 0.8, (b) x = 0.9, (c) x = 1.0, (d) x = 1.1, (e) x = 1.2, (f) x = 1.3, (g) x = 1.4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of AEPx/MBA1.5/span601; (a’) x = 0.8, (b’) x = 0.9, (c’) x = 1.0, (d’) x = 1.1, (e’) x = 1.2, (f’) x = 1.3, (g’) x = 1.4.
Figure 1. Optical microscopy (OM) images of hyperbranched poly(amidoamine) particles obtained with the following monomer feed ratio; AEPx/MBA1.5/span601. (a) x = 0.8, (b) x = 0.9, (c) x = 1.0, (d) x = 1.1, (e) x = 1.2, (f) x = 1.3, (g) x = 1.4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of AEPx/MBA1.5/span601; (a’) x = 0.8, (b’) x = 0.9, (c’) x = 1.0, (d’) x = 1.1, (e’) x = 1.2, (f’) x = 1.3, (g’) x = 1.4.
Molecules 24 03866 g001
Figure 2. Attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR) (a), and thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) data (b). The ATR-IR sample was AEP1.2/MBA1.5/span601 in (a).
Figure 2. Attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR) (a), and thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) data (b). The ATR-IR sample was AEP1.2/MBA1.5/span601 in (a).
Molecules 24 03866 g002
Figure 3. Size change of the hPAMAM particles with different span60 concentration. OM images of AEP1.2/MBA1.5/span600.5 (a), AEP1.2/MBA1.5/span601 (b), AEP1.2/MBA1.5/span605 (c), graph of copper (II) ion absorption amount at 1, 3, 10, 20 min, and 24 h in the three surfactant concentrations (d).
Figure 3. Size change of the hPAMAM particles with different span60 concentration. OM images of AEP1.2/MBA1.5/span600.5 (a), AEP1.2/MBA1.5/span601 (b), AEP1.2/MBA1.5/span605 (c), graph of copper (II) ion absorption amount at 1, 3, 10, 20 min, and 24 h in the three surfactant concentrations (d).
Molecules 24 03866 g003
Table 1. Copper (II) ion sorption capacities of various sorbents. hPAMAM: Hyperbranched poly(amidoamine); EDA: Ethylenediamine.
Table 1. Copper (II) ion sorption capacities of various sorbents. hPAMAM: Hyperbranched poly(amidoamine); EDA: Ethylenediamine.
SorbentCu2+ Sorption Capacity (g/g)Reference
Dowex M41950.054[22]
Graphene oxide/Fe3O40.023[23]
PEI-PS resin0.116[24]
m-MCM-41/PMMA0.042[25]
m-KIT-60.102[26]
[email protected]0.164[27]
Polyaniline grafted chitosan beads0.100[28]
Magnetic chitosan beads0.147[29]
PAMAM dendrimer0.329[15]
EDA-MBA hPAMAM particles0.170[22]
AEP-MBA hPAMAM particles0.223This work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, H.; Eom, Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, S.Y. Copper Ions Removal from Water using A2B3 Type Hyperbranched Poly(amidoamine) Hydrogel Particles. Molecules 2019, 24, 3866. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24213866

AMA Style

Choi H, Eom Y, Lee S, Kim SY. Copper Ions Removal from Water using A2B3 Type Hyperbranched Poly(amidoamine) Hydrogel Particles. Molecules. 2019; 24(21):3866. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24213866

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, Hojung, Youngsik Eom, Sanghwa Lee, and Sang Youl Kim. 2019. "Copper Ions Removal from Water using A2B3 Type Hyperbranched Poly(amidoamine) Hydrogel Particles" Molecules 24, no. 21: 3866. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24213866

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop