Next Article in Journal
High-Frequency Occurrence of Surfactin Monomethyl Isoforms in the Ferment Broth of a Bacillus subtilis Strain Revealed by Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry
Next Article in Special Issue
Electronic Effect on the Molecular Motion of Aromatic Amides: Combined Studies Using VT-NMR and Quantum Calculations
Previous Article in Journal
Native V. californicum Alkaloid Combinations Induce Differential Inhibition of Sonic Hedgehog Signaling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transition-Metal-Free Activation of Amide Bond by Arynes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

K2S2O8-Promoted Aryl Thioamides Synthesis from Aryl Aldehydes Using Thiourea as the Sulfur Source

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jinzhong University, Yuci 030619, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work
Molecules 2018, 23(9), 2225; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092225
Submission received: 30 July 2018 / Revised: 24 August 2018 / Accepted: 29 August 2018 / Published: 1 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Amide Bond Activation)

Abstract

:
Thiourea as a sulfur atom transfer reagent was applied for the synthesis of aryl thioamides through a three-component coupling reaction with aryl aldehydes and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) or N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAC). The reaction could tolerate various functional groups and gave moderate to good yields of desired products under the transition-metal-free condition.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The synthesis of sulfur-containing organic compounds has received much attention in recent years, due to their wide applications in biology, chemistry, and materials science [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. There are many sulfur reagents for their synthesis, such as P2S5 [11], Lawesson’s reagent [12], disulfides [13,14,15], thiols [16,17,18,19], sulfonyl hydrazides [20,21,22,23], sodium sulfonate [24,25,26,27,28], and elemental sulfur [29,30,31,32]. Among them, both P2S5 and Lawesson’s reagent are the most widely used reagents, and yet they have an obvious drawback of being sensitive to moisture. Therefore, much better sulfur reagents have been pursued by the organic chemists for the past decades [33]. Thioamides, as an important class of sulfur-containing organic compounds, have been synthesized by applying different sulfur reagents as the sulfur source [1,34,35,36,37,38,39]. For example, Jiang et al. [35] reported that sodium sulfide as a sulfur source was applied for the synthesis of thioamides using aldehydes and N-substituted formamides. More recently, a coupling reaction between quaternary ammoniums, N-substituted formamides, and sodium disulfide was accomplished for rapid access to aryl thioamides [36]. Thiourea as an inexpensive and easy-to-handle sulfur atom transfer reagent, was used extensively as well, mainly for the synthesis of inorganic metal sulfides [40,41,42], organic thioethers [43,44,45,46,47], and thioesters [48,49]. As far as we known, a similar reaction using thiourea and aldehydes to prepare thioamides has not yet been introduced. Hence, we want to report a new three-component coupling reaction between aryl aldehydes, thiourea as an effective sulfur source, and DMF or DMAC, for the synthesis of various aryl thioamides.

2. Results and Discussion

Initially, we treated the reaction of 4-chlorobenzaldehyde 1a in DMF and H2O at 125 °C in the presence of thiourea using the benzoyl peroxide (BPO) as an oxidant. After 24 h, the desired thioamide product 3a was isolated in 58% yield (Table 1, Entry 1). Subsequently, various oxidants, which are commonly used in C-H activation, such as p-benzoquinone (BQ), di-t-butyl peroxide (DTBP), tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP), K2S2O8, or (NH4)2S2O8, were attempted, to optimize the reaction condition (Table 1, Entries 2–6). Among them, K2S2O8 proved to be best to give the desired thioamide product 3a in 69% yield (Table 1, Entry 5). For this transformation, H2O played an extremely important role. No desired product 3a was observed when increasing the concentration of H2O to 42 M or without addition of H2O (Table 1, Entries 7 and 9). Slightly enhancing or reducing the loading amount of K2S2O8, the yield of 3a was not obviously changeable (Table 1, Entries 10–11). When the 20% of Cu(OAc)2 were used as a catalyst, only 54% yield of 3a was afforded (Table 1, Entry 12) [36]. To our delight, the yield of 3a was further promoted to 80% when 5 equiv. of pyridine (Py) as an additive were added (Table 1, Entry 13) [35].
After establishing the optimized conditions, this procedure was applied to access a variety of aryl thioamide derivatives. Several different aryl aldehydes could undergo this transformation smoothly in a mild condition to give the desired products 3ar (Scheme 1). The results indicated that many popular functional groups were well tolerated, such as methyl, methoxyl, chloro, bromo, fluoro, trifluoromethyl, and tert-butyl. Furthermore, the substrate bearing a sensitive hydroxy group, which was generally protected in the presence of an oxidant could be also tolerated in this transformation, and afforded the desired product 3o in 83% yield. A substituted amino was suitable as well, and gave 88% yield of 3p. The substituents on aromatic aldehydes had a certain influence on this transformation. When the substituents were strong electron-withdrawing groups, either lower yield of desired products, or no desired products were obtained (3j and 3r). The desired product 3m was not afforded possibly due to the steric hindrance. Moreover, our experiments demonstrated that 2-naphthaldehyde was a suitable substrate for this transformation, and gave the desired product 3q a good yield.
To further expand the substrate scope, some selected heterocyclic aldehydes and an aliphatic aldehyde were examined under the optimal condition (Scheme 2). Generally, five or six members heterocyclic derivatives were suitable for this transformation, such as furan-2-carbaldehyde, thiophene-2-carbaldehyde, and nicotinaldehyde, giving the corresponding thioamide products 3s, 3t, and 3u 54%, 74%, and 37% yields, respectively. In addition, aliphatic aldehyde did not accomplish this transformation (3w).
We attempted to explore the different N-substituted formamides for this transformation in additional solvent. No good results were provided when the normal solvents such as N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), 1,4-dioxane, 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE), toluene, chlorobenzene (PhCl), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethylene glycol, were used (see Supporting Information). Unexpectedly, N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAC), which was seldom used as an amine source by the acyl C-N bond activation [37], could replace DMF to give the same desired product in good yield. Subsequently, the reactions of aryl aldehydes with thiourea in DMAC were examined under the similar reaction condition (Table 2). The results demonstrated that various groups were tolerated well, such as methyl, chloro, and bromo, and the good yields of the desired products were isolated.
In addition, extremely small amounts of amide products were observed, along with the generation of thioamide products under the optimal condition. So, two control experiments were conducted to explain the tentative reaction mechanism (see Supporting Information). First, no thioamide product was formed in the absence of thiourea, and only trace amounts of amide product were observed. Second, when the N,N-dimethylbenzamide replacing the benzaldehyde was manipulated under the standard condition, no desired thioamide was observed.
Based on our experimental results and previous reports [35], a proposed reaction mechanism for this transformation is described in Scheme 3. First, an aryl aldehyde undergoes a nucleophilic attack by a dimethylamine, which is from the hydrolysis of DMF, to generate iminium intermediate A. The iminium A then is directly attacked by thiourea to form the intermediate B, together with the release of urea [43,47,49]. Finally, intermediate B is oxidized by K2S2O8 to afford the desired thioamide product.

3. Materials and Methods

Unless otherwise stated, all reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial suppliers, and were used without further purification. Reactions were monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis on silica gel 60 F254, and visualization was accomplished by irradiation with short wave UV light at 254 nm. 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 or a 500 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany), with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard. The coupling constants J are given in Hz. Mass spectra were measured with the Thermo Scientific LTQ Orbitrap XL MS spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) or GC-MS QP2010 (Comfort Technology Limited, Kowloon, Hong Kong).
A mixture of aldehyde 1 (0.25 mmol), thiourea (0.5 mmol), K2S2O8 (0.5 mmol), and Py (1.25 mmol) in 2.0 mL DMF/H2O (v/v = 3:1) was stirred in a sealed tube under air at 125 °C for 24 h. After the reaction was achieved, the crude mixture was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, EtOAc/petroleum ether) to afford the desired product 3.
4-Chloro-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide (3a) [35]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.36–7.33 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.26 (m, 2H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 3.19 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 199.91, 141.66, 134.60, 128.58, 127.29, 44.18, 43.32; HRMS (ESI) m/z calculated (calcd.) for C9H11ClNS+ (M + H)+ 200.02952, found 200.02971.
N,N-Dimethylbenzothioamide (3b) [35]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.37–7.30 (m, 5H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 3.19 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 201.65, 143.69, 128.89, 128.64, 126.04, 44.44, 43.53; GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 165.10 (70, M+), 164.05 (98), 121.05 (100), 77.00 (46).
4-Methyl-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide3c [35]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.23 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.16 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 3.20 (s, 3H), 2.36 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 201.55, 140.59, 138.68, 128.89, 125.89, 44.22, 43.35, 21.27; GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 179.05 (80, M+). 178.05 (100), 145.10 (50), 135.05 (98), 91.05 (45).
4-Methoxy-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide (3d) [35]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.31 (d, J = 12 Hz, 2H), 6.87 (d, J = 12 Hz, 2H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 3.22 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 201.31, 160.02, 135.82, 127.90, 113.51, 55.40, 44.37, 43.59; GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 195.05 (M+, 84), 194.05 (93), 151.05 (100).
4-Bromo-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide (3e) [35]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.53–7.50 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.19 (m, 2H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 3.19 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 199.79, 142.12, 131.53, 127.52, 122.73, 44.20, 44.30; GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 242.95 (63, M+), 243.90 (100), 242.95 (63), 241.90 (92), 200.85 (47), 198.90 (48), 120.00 (54).
4-Fluoro-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide (3f) [35]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.32–7.28 (m, 2 H), 7.05–6.99 (m, 2H), 3.58 (s, 3H), 3.16 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 200.19, 162.66 (d, J = 248 Hz), 139.44 (d, J = 4 Hz), 128.00 (d, J = 9 Hz), 115.33 (d, J = 22 Hz), 44.24, 43.45.
3-Chloro-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide (3g) [35]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.33–7.25 (m, 3H), 7.20–7.18 (m, 1H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 3.19 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 199.11, 144.78, 134.29, 129.76, 128.63, 125.89, 123.83, 44.18, 43.18; GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 200.00 (43), 199.0 (69, M+). 198.00 (100), 165.00 (32), 157.00 (26), 155.00 (74), 111.00 (24).
3-Bromo-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide (3h) [35]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.50–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.27–7.22 (m, 2H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 3.19 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 199.01, 144.98, 131.56, 129.99, 128.68, 124.30, 122.38, 44.19, 43.19; GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 244.95 (64), 243.95 (100), 242.95 (65, M+), 241.95 (95), 200.90 (43), 198.90 (43), 120.00 (51).
3-Methyl-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide (3i) [35]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.34–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.17 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 7.11 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 3.21 (s, 3H), 2.40 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 201.2, 143.2, 138.0, 129.1, 128.0, 126.1, 122.4, 44.0, 43.0, 21.2.
4-(Trifluoromethyl)-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide (3j) [35]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.64 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (d, J = 12 Hz, 2H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.18 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 199.30, 146.56,130.46 (q, J = 32.6 Hz),126.02, 125.56 (q, J = 3.8 Hz), 123.73 (q, J = 270.5 Hz), 44.07, 43.09; GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 233.00 (M+, 71), 232.00 (100), 199.05 (37), 189.00 (64).
4-tert-Butyl-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide (3k) [37]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.38–7.35 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.24 (m, 2H), 3.61 (s, 3H), 3.21 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 9H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 201.64, 151.78, 140.49, 125.67, 125.22, 44.27, 43.34, 34.70, 31.23. GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 221.10 (70, M+), 220.05 (70), 147.05 (24).
3,5-di-tert-Butyl-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide (3l). 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.39 (t, J = 4 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (d, J = 4 Hz, 2H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.16 (s, 3H), 1.33 (s, 18H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 202.78, 150.70, 142.63, 122.75, 120.13, 44.21, 43.32, 34.92, 31.40. GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 277.15 (86, M+), 276.15 (100), 220.05 (80). HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd. for C17H28NS+ (M + H)+ 278.19370, found 278.19366.
4-Benzyl-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide (3n) [38]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.59–7.56 (m, 4H), 7.47–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.41–7.34 (m, 3H),3.62 (s, 3H), 3.23 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 201.04, 142.17, 141.56, 140.33, 128.89, 127.69, 127.10, 127.09, 126.39, 44.28, 43.32. GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 241.05 (78, M+), 240.05 (100), 197.00 (58), 181.05 (66), 152.05 (74).
4-Hydroxy-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide (3o) [35]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.21–7.15 (m, 2H), 6.75–6.70 (m, 2H), 5.89 (br s, 1H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 3.21 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 200.97, 156. 03, 136. 00, 127.45, 114.85, 43.97, 43.20; GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 181.05 (M+, 74), 180.05 (79), 147.10 (31), 137.05 (100).
4-(Dimethylamino)-N,N-dimethylbenzothioamide (3p) [50]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.32 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.63 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 3.59 (s, 3H), 3.28 (s, 3H), 2.99 (s, 6H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 201.64, 150.54, 130.30, 127.98, 110.56, 44.19, 43.40, 39.86; GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 208.05 (M+, 74), 207.05 (46), 164.05 (100), 148.10 (57).
N,N-Dimethylnaphthalene-2-carbothioamide (3q) [35]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.82–7.81 (m, 3H), 7.77 (s, 1H), 7.53–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.44–7.41(m, 1H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 3.19 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 201.21, 140.60, 128.38, 128.20, 127.75, 126.78, 126.74, 124.73, 123.94, 44.27, 43.31.
N,N-Dimethylfuran-2-carbothioamide (3s) [51]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.47 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1H), 6.46 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1H),3.56 (s, 3H), 3.45 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 158.31, 151.98, 142.80, 117.27, 111.49, 44.01, 43.80. GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 155.05 (100, M+), 111.00 (70), 73.95 (27).
N,N-Dimethylthiophene-2-carbothioamide (3t) [35]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 7.41 (dd, J = 4.8, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (dd, J = 4.0, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.99–6.97 (m, 1H), 3.58 (s, 3H), 3.45 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm):191.63, 145.23, 129.30, 126.50, 126.45, 44.65. GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 171.00 (77, M+), 127.00 (100).
N,N-Dimethylpyridine-3-carbothioamide (3u) [52]. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 8.59–8.57 (m, 2H),7.69 (dt, J = 8.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.30 (m, 1H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 3.23 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm):197.59, 149.63, 146.19, 133.70, 123.18, 44.25, 43.37. GC-MS (EI) m/z (%) 166.05 (85, M+), 165.05 (88), 149.10 (35), 122.00 (100), 106.05 (38), 78.00 (62).
N,N-Dimethyl-5-(quinolin-2-yl) thiophene-2-carbothioamide (3v). 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ (ppm): 8.15 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.74–7.69 (m, 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1H), 7.54–7.49 (m, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1H), 3.56 (d, J = 40 Hz, 6H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ (ppm): 191.56, 151.54, 148.18, 148.08, 146.86, 136.77, 130.01, 129.37, 127.82, 127.53, 127.40, 126.49, 124.94, 117.42, 44.54. HRMS (ESI) m/z calculated (calcd.) for C16H15N2S2+ (M + H)+ 299.06712, found 299.06706.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have demonstrated an efficient and transitional-metal-free method for the synthesis of aryl thioamides derived from aryl aldehydes using thiourea as a sulfur source in the presence of potassium persulfate, in DMF or DMAC. This strategy has the advantages of good functional-group tolerance and gives moderate to good yields of desired products. Further studies on synthetic applications are currently under way.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/23/9/2225/s1, Table S1: Screening of various solvents, Figure S1: Three control experiments for mechanism study, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and MS spectrum of 3a–w.

Author Contributions

X.Q. conceived and designed the experiments; Y.B. performed the experiments; Y.C. contributed reagents/materials; J.L. and L.L. wrote the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi (NO. 2015176), the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Jinzhong University (NO. bsjj2015213 and NO. bsjj2015214) and the Construction plan of the ‘1331 engineering’ photoelectric material innovation team of Jinzhong University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Petrov, K.A.; Andreev, L.N. The Chemical Properties of Thioamides. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1971, 40, 505–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cremlyn, R.J. An Introduction to Organo-Sulfur Chemistry; Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jiang, W.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z. Heteroarenes as high performance organic semiconductors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6113–6127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jagodziński, T.S. Thioamides as Useful Synthons in the Synthesis of Heterocycles. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 197–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lincke, T.; Behnken, S.; Ishida, K.; Roth, M.; Hertweck, C. Closthioamide: An Unprecedented Polythioamide Antibiotic from the Strictly Anaerobic Bacterium Clostridium cellulolyticum. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2011–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shen, C.; Zhang, P.F.; Sun, Q.; Bai, S.Q.; Andy Hor, T.S.; Liu, X.G. Recent advances in C–S bond formation via C–H bond functionalization and decarboxylation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 291–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Anthony, J.E. Functionalized Acenes and Heteroacenes for Organic Electronics. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 5028–5048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ashfaq, M.; Shah, S.S.A.; Najam, T.; Ahmad, M.M.; Tabassum, R.; Rivera, G. Synthetic Thioamide, Benzimidazole, Quinolone and Derivatives with Carboxylic Acid and Ester Moieties: A Strategy in the Design of Antituberculosis Agents. Curr. Med. Chem. 2014, 21, 911–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zoumpoulakis, P.; Camoutsis, C.; Pairas, G.; Sokovic, M.; Glamoclija, J.; Potamitis, C.; Pitsas, A. Synthesis of novel sulfonamide-1,2,4-triazoles, 1,3,4-thiadiazoles and 1,3,4-oxadiazoles, as potential antibacterial and antifungal agents. Biological evaluation and conformational analysis studies. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 1569–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Guo, W.; Fu, Y.Z. A Perspective on Energy Densities of Rechargeable Li-S Batteries and Alternative Sulfur-Based Cathode Materials. Energy Environ. Mater. 2018, 1, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Polshettiwar, V. Phosphorus Pentasulfide (P4S10). Synlett 2004, 12, 2245–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ozturk, T.; Ertas, E.; Mert, O. Use of Lawesson’s Reagent in Organic Syntheses. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5210–5278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vásquez-Céspedes, S.; Ferry, A.; Candish, L.; Glorius, F. Heterogeneously Catalyzed Direct C–H Thiolation of Heteroarenes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 5772–5776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jiao, J.; Wei, L.; Ji, X.M.; Hu, M.L.; Tang, R.Y. Direct Introduction of Dithiocarbamates onto Imidazoheterocycles under Mild Conditions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rafique, J.; Saba, S.; Rosário, A.R.; Braga, A.L. Regioselective, Solvent- and Metal-Free Chalcogenation of Imidazo[1,2-a] pyridines by Employing I2/DMSO as the Catalytic Oxidation System. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 11854–11862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ding, Q.P.; Cao, B.P.; Yuan, J.J.; Liu, X.J.; Peng, Y.Y. Synthesis of thioethers via metal-free reductive coupling of tosylhydrazones with thiols. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 748–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ravi, C.; Mohan, D.C.; Adimurthy, S. N-Chlorosuccinimide-Promoted Regioselective Sulfenylation of Imidazoheterocycles at Room Temperature. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 2978–2981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hiebel, M.A.; Berteina-Raboin, S. Iodine-catalyzed regioselective sulfenylation of imidazoheterocycles in PEG400. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 937–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Siddaraju, Y.; Prabhu, K.R. Iodine-Catalyzed Cross Dehydrogenative Coupling Reaction: A Regioselective Sulfenylation of Imidazoheterocycles Using Dimethyl Sulfoxide as an Oxidant. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 7838–7846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Yang, F.L.; Tian, S.K. Iodine-Catalyzed Regioselective Sulfenylation of Indoles with Sulfonyl Hydrazides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4929–4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Yang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Tang, L.; Hu, Y.B.; Zha, Z.G.; Wang, Z.Y. Catalyst-free thiolation of indoles with sulfonyl hydrazides for the synthesis of 3-sulfenylindoles in water. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 2609–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Singh, R.; Allam, K.B.; Singh, N.; Kumari, K.; Singh, S.K. A Direct Metal-Free Decarboxylative Sulfono Functionalization (DSF) of Cinnamic Acids to α, β-Unsaturated Phenyl Sulfones. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 2656–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Senadi, G.C.; Guo, B.C.; Hu, W.P.; Wang, J.J. Iodine-promoted cyclization of N-propynyl amides and N-allyl amides via sulfonylation and sulfenylation. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 11410–11413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Handa, S.; Fennewald, J.C.; Lipshutz, B.H. Aerobic Oxidation in Nanomicelles of Aryl Alkynes, in Water at Room Temperature. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 3432–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Rao, W.H.; Shi, B.F. Copper(II)-Catalyzed Direct Sulfonylation of C(sp2)–H Bonds with Sodium Sulfinates. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 2784–2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ding, Y.; Wu, W.; Zhao, W.; Li, Y.; Xie, P.; Huang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, A. Generation of thioethers via direct C–H functionalization with sodium benzenesulfinate as a sulfur source. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 1428–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Xiao, F.; Chen, S.; Tian, J.; Huang, H.; Liu, Y.; Deng, G.J. Chemoselective cross-coupling reaction of sodium sulfinates with phenols under aqueous conditions. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 1538–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guo, Y.J.; Lu, S.; Tian, L.L.; Huang, E.L.; Hao, X.Q.; Zhu, X.J.; Shao, T.; Song, M.P. Iodine-Mediated Difunctionalization of Imidazopyridines with Sodium Sulfinates: Synthesis of Sulfones and Sulfides. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 338–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhou, Z.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J.F.; Yao, E.; Cheng, J. Multicomponent Coupling Reactions of Two N-Tosyl Hydrazones and Elemental Sulfur: Selective Denitrogenation Pathway toward Unsymmetric 2,5-Disubstituted 1,3,4-Thiadiazoles. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 5268–5271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ravi, C.; Reddy, N.N.K.; Pappula, V.; Samanta, S.; Adimurthy, S. Copper-Catalyzed Three-Component System for Arylsulfenylation of Imidazopyridines with Elemental Sulfur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 9964–9972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, J.R.; Liao, Y.Y.; Deng, J.C.; Feng, K.Y.; Zhang, M.; Ning, Y.Y.; Lin, Z.W.; Tang, R.Y. Oxidative dual C–H thiolation of imidazopyridines with ethers or alkanes using elemental sulphur. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 7784–7787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhu, X.M.; Yang, Y.Z.; Xiao, G.H.; Song, J.X.; Liang, Y.; Deng, G.B. Double C–S bond formation via C–H bond functionalization: Synthesis of benzothiazoles and naphtho[2,1-d]thiazoles from N-substituted arylamines and elemental sulfur. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 11917–11920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bergman, J. Comparison of Two Reagents for Thionations. Synthesis 2018, 50, 2323–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hurd, R.N.; Delamater, G. The Preparation and Chemical Properties of Thionamides. Chem. Rev. 1961, 61, 45–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wei, J.P.; Li, Y.M.; Jiang, X.F. Aqueous Compatible Protocol to Both Alkyl and Aryl Thioamide Synthesis. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 340–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhou, Z.; Yu, J.T.; Zhou, Y.N.; Jiang, Y.; Cheng, J. Aqueous MCRs of quaternary ammoniums, N-substituted formamides and sodium disulfide towards aryl thioamides. Org. Chem. Front. 2017, 4, 413–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xu, K.; Li, Z.Y.; Cheng, F.Y.; Zuo, Z.Z.; Wang, T.; Wang, M.C.; Liu, L.T. Transition-Metal-Free Cleavage of C–C Triple Bonds in Aromatic Alkynes with S8 and Amides Leading to Aryl Thioamides. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 2228–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kumar, S.; Vanjari, R.; Guntreddi, T.; Singh, K.N. Sulfur promoted decarboxylative thioamidation of carboxylic acids using formamides as amine proxy. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 2012–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nguyen, T.B.; Tran, M.Q.; Ermolenko, L.; Al-Mourabit, A. Three-Component Reaction between Alkynes, Elemental Sulfur, and Aliphatic Amines: A General, Straightforward, and Atom Economical Approach to Thioamides. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 310–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Rao, M.M.; Jayalakshmi, M.; Reddy, R.S. Time-selective Hydrothermal Synthesis of SnS Nanorods and Nanoparticles by Thiourea Hydrolysis. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 1044–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jayalakshmi, M.; Rao, M.M. Synthesis of zinc sulphide nanoparticles by thiourea hydrolysis and their characterization for electrochemical capacitor applications. J. Power Sources 2006, 157, 624–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, K.; Han, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhu, J. One-Step Synthesis of Bi2S3/BiOX and Bi2S3/(BiO)2CO3 Heterojunction Photocatalysts by Using Aqueous Thiourea Solution as Both Solvent and Sulfur Source. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 6136–6145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Manivel, P.; Prabakaran, K.; Krishnakumar, V.; Khan, F.N.; Maiyalagan, T. Thiourea-Mediated Regioselective Synthesis of Symmetrical and Unsymmetrical Diversified Thioethers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 7866–7870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Niu, H.; Xia, C.; Qu, G.; Wu, S.; Jiang, Y.; Jin, X.; Guo, H. Microwave-Promoted “One-Pot” Synthesis of 4-Nitrobenzylthioinosine Analogues Using Thiourea as a Sulfur Precursor. Chem. Asian J. 2012, 7, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Firouzabadi, H.; Iranpoor, N.; Gholinejad, M. One-Pot Thioetherification of Aryl Halides Using Thiourea and Alkyl Bromides Catalyzed by Copper(I) Iodide Free from Foul-Smelling Thiols in Wet Polyethylene Glycol (PEG 200). Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mondal, J.; Modak, A.; Dutta, A.; Basu, S.; Jha, S.N.; Bhattacharyya, D.; Bhaumik, A. One-pot thioetherification of aryl halides with thiourea and benzylbromide in water catalyzed by Cu-grafted furfural imine-functionalized mesoporous SBA-15. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 8000–8002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ma, X.; Yu, L.; Su, C.; Yang, Y.; Li, H.; Xu, Q. Efficient Generation of C-S Bonds via a By-Product-Promoted Selective Coupling of Alcohols, Organic Halides, and Thiourea. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 1649–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abbasi, M.; Khalifeh, R. One-pot odourless synthesis of thioesters via in situ generation of thiobenzoic acids using benzoic anhydrides and thiourea. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 1265–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Swain, S.P.; Chou, Y.; Hou, D. Thioesterifications Free of Activating Agent and Thiol: A Three-Component Reaction of Carboxylic Acids, Thioureas, and Michael Acceptors. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 2644–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bezgubenko, L.V.; Pipko, S.E.; Sinitsa, A.D. Dichlorothiophosphoric acid and dichlorothiophosphate anion as thionating agents in the synthesis of thioamides. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2008, 78, 1341–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Meltzer, R.I.; Lewis, A.D.; King, J.A. Antitubercular Substances. IV. Thioamides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 4062–4066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Perregaard, J.; Lawesson, S.O. Studies on Organophosphoous Compounds. XI.* Oxidation of Aromatic Compounds with Sulfur in Hexamethylphosphoric Triamide (HMPA). A New Method for Preparation of N,N-Dimethylthiocarboxamides. Acta Chem. Scand. B 1975, 29, 604–608. [Google Scholar]
Sample Availability: Not available.
Scheme 1. The substrate scope of substituted benzaldehydes. Reaction condition: aryl aldehyde 1 (0.25 mmol), thiourea (0.5 mmol), H2O (14 M), K2S2O8 (0.5 mmol) and Py (5 equiv.) in DMF (1.5 mL) at 125 °C for 24 h in sealed tube. Isolated yields were given.
Scheme 1. The substrate scope of substituted benzaldehydes. Reaction condition: aryl aldehyde 1 (0.25 mmol), thiourea (0.5 mmol), H2O (14 M), K2S2O8 (0.5 mmol) and Py (5 equiv.) in DMF (1.5 mL) at 125 °C for 24 h in sealed tube. Isolated yields were given.
Molecules 23 02225 sch001
Scheme 2. The substrate scope of other aldehydes. Reaction condition: aldehyde 1 (0.25 mmol), thiourea (0.5 mmol), H2O (14 M), K2S2O8 (0.5 mmol), and Py (5 equiv.) in DMF (1.5 mL) at 125 °C for 24 h in sealed tube. Isolated yields were given.
Scheme 2. The substrate scope of other aldehydes. Reaction condition: aldehyde 1 (0.25 mmol), thiourea (0.5 mmol), H2O (14 M), K2S2O8 (0.5 mmol), and Py (5 equiv.) in DMF (1.5 mL) at 125 °C for 24 h in sealed tube. Isolated yields were given.
Molecules 23 02225 sch002aMolecules 23 02225 sch002b
Scheme 3. Plausible reaction pathway.
Scheme 3. Plausible reaction pathway.
Molecules 23 02225 sch003
Table 1. Optimization of reaction conditions a.
Molecules 23 02225 i001
Table 1. Optimization of reaction conditions a.
Molecules 23 02225 i001
EntryOxidant (Equiv)Concentration of H2O (M)Yield (%) b
1BPO (2)1458
2BQ (2)140
3DTBP (2)14<5
4TBHP (2)1420
5K2S2O8 (2)1469
6(NH4)2S2O8 (2)1455
7K2S2O8 (2)420 c
8K2S2O8 (2)865 d
9K2S2O8 (2)00 e
10K2S2O8 (3)1468
11K2S2O8 (1.8)1461
12K2S2O8 (2)1454 f
13K2S2O8 (2)1480 g
a Condition: 1a (0.25 mmol), 2 (9.6 M), thiourea (0.5 mmol), oxidant, H2O, 125 °C, 24 h. b Isolated yield. c 3.4 M of DMF were used. d 11 M of DMF were used. e 13 M of DMF were used. f 20 mol% of Cu(OAc)2 were added. g 5 equiv. of pyridine (Py) were added.
Table 2. The synthesis of aryl thioamides by DMAC a.
Molecules 23 02225 i002
Table 2. The synthesis of aryl thioamides by DMAC a.
Molecules 23 02225 i002
EntryRYield (%) of 3 b
14-Cl63 (3a)
2H52 (3b)
34-CH355 (3c)
43-Br48 (3h)
53-CH351 (3i)
64-Ph60 (3n)
a Condition: 1 (0.25 mmol), 4 (1.5 mL), thiourea (0.5 mmol), K2S2O8 (0.5 mmol), H2O (0.5 mL), Py (1.25 mmol), 125 °C, 36 h. b Isolated yield.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bian, Y.; Qu, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, L. K2S2O8-Promoted Aryl Thioamides Synthesis from Aryl Aldehydes Using Thiourea as the Sulfur Source. Molecules 2018, 23, 2225. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092225

AMA Style

Bian Y, Qu X, Chen Y, Li J, Liu L. K2S2O8-Promoted Aryl Thioamides Synthesis from Aryl Aldehydes Using Thiourea as the Sulfur Source. Molecules. 2018; 23(9):2225. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092225

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bian, Yongjun, Xingyu Qu, Yongqiang Chen, Jun Li, and Leng Liu. 2018. "K2S2O8-Promoted Aryl Thioamides Synthesis from Aryl Aldehydes Using Thiourea as the Sulfur Source" Molecules 23, no. 9: 2225. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092225

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop