Synthesis and Evaluation of Biological Activities of Aziridine Derivatives of Urea and Thiourea

Abstract

In the present paper, we report the synthesis and evaluation of in vitro antimicrobial activities of aziridine-thiourea derivatives. A series of aziridines in reaction with isocyanates and isothiocyanates to obtain urea and thiourea derivatives were used. The structures of all new products were confirmed based on spectroscopic data (¹H-NMR, ¹³C-NMR, HR-MS). These compounds were screened for their in vitro antimicrobial activity against a panel of Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains of bacteria. Six of the tested compounds appeared to be promising agents against reference strains of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Subsequently, compounds exhibiting promising antibacterial activity were tested against twelve clinical isolates of S. aureus from three different sources of infection. The most bactericidal compounds (MIC = 16–32 µg/mL) showed better antibacterial activity against MRSA than ampicillin and streptomycin. The in vitro cytotoxicity analysis on L929 murine fibroblast and HeLa human tumor cell line using the MTT assay allowed us to select the least toxic compounds for future investigation.

1. Introduction

Aziridines are nitrogen-containing, three-membered ring heterocycles, which are widely known as useful reactive intermediates in the synthesis of amino acid derivatives, azomethine ylides or chiral amino alcohols [1,2,3]. In addition, they are used as chiral auxiliaries and chiral ligands in asymmetric synthesis [4,5,6,7,8] or in fused heterocycles [9]. Besides their importance as reactive intermediates, aziridine-containing compounds possess many biological activities especially antitumor and antibacterial ones, due to the presence of the aziridine ring [10]. Aziridines are powerful alkylating agents and their in vivo potency is based primarily on toxicity rather than specific activity. The toxicity of aziridine derivatives depends on their structure, and several important natural products, such as mitomycin C [11], porfiromycin [12], and carzinophilin A [13] are well known in the literature as biologically active agents. Physiological effect of mitomycin C relies on aziridine ring opening and interaction with guanine nucleobase of DNA in the alkylation reaction. This leads to covalent interstrand DNA–DNA crosslink formation, inhibition of replication and finally to cell death. Aziridines with the amide function are currently of special interest with Imexon as the well-known representative. Imexon is an anticancer agent active especially against human myeloma cells where it binds to cellular thiols, reduces the amount of glutathione and cysteine in target cells which leads to elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). As a result, mitochondria swell, cytochrome c is released, caspase 3 and 9 are activated and the cells enter an apoptotic pathway [14,15]. Imexon is also known to disrupt the redox balance of the endoplasmic reticulum which inhibits protein translation and arrests cell growth [16]. In combination with docetaxel it has been successfully applied in the trial treatment of different cancers [17]. Other work related its activity to suppression of B-lymphocyte activation which suggested Imexon to be useful in the treatment of B-cell or plasma cell lymphomas or neoplasias, certain autoimmune disorders and infection with Rauscher leukemia virus [18,19]. Natural aziridine alkaloids, as well as their lipophilic semi-synthetic, and synthetic analogs, in addition to antitumor activity, have also a strong antibacterial activity [20]. Well known mitomycin A, C and mitosane compounds show antimicrobial activity primarily against Gram-positive bacteria and Klebsiella pneumoniae [10,20]. Azirinomycin (3-methyl-2H-azirine-2-carboxylic acid) is most active against Staphylococcus aureus followed by Streptococcus faecalis, Proteus vulgaris and Bacillus subtilis. The methyl ester of azirinomycin exhibited broad spectrum antibiotic activity in vitro against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [21,22]. The alkaloidal antibiotic ficellomycin produced by Streptomyces ficellus inhibited growth of Gram-positive bacteria in vitro and in vivo during treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus infections in mice [23]. Some naturally occurring peptides containing an aziridine ring, for example madurastatin A1 and B1, consisting of Ser and salicylic acid moieties exhibit antibacterial activity against Micrococcus luteus [24]. Anticancer drugs, azinomycin A and B are active against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Two other aziridine derivatives, azicemicin A and B demonstrate strong antibacterial activity mainly against Mycobacterium smegmatis, Escherichia coli NIHJ, Corynebacterium bovis and Micrococcus luteus [25]. A chromoprotein antitumor drug maduropeptin exhibits inhibitory activity against Gram-positive bacteria [26]. There are also known some aziridine, 2-aminoethylaziridine and azirine complexes of copper(II) and palladium(II) with potent antimicrobial properties against Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus, S. epidermidis, E. faecalis) [27]. Moreover, one derivative of diaziridinyl quinone isoxazole hybrid showed good antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities with very low MIC values against S. aureus and B. subtilis and it also exhibited antifungal activity against Candida albicans [28].

Many other natural or synthesized compounds with different structures like lipids, steroids, amino acids and peptides containing the aziridine moiety have also shown biological activity and are promising candidates for the development of new drugs against several diseases [10,27,29,30].

In the present paper, we focused on the design and synthesis of structurally novel urea and thiourea aziridine derivatives and evaluation of their biological activity based on the fact that many aziridine ring containing compounds have demonstrated antibacterial and cytotoxic activities.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

In continuation of the studies on the synthesis and application of chiral aziridines [1,8,10,29,31,32,33], we used chiral aminoalcohols 1 to convert them into NH aziridines 2 via a modified Wenker synthesis [34]. Aminoalcohols 1a–b in the presence of chlorosulfonic acid form sulfonic esters under mild conditions in quantitative yields. These esters under strong basic conditions were converted into the corresponding aziridines 2a–c at elevated temperature (Figure 1).

Non-protected aziridines are stable compounds under basic conditions and they can easily react with diverse electrophiles. In our case, we used a series of aziridines 2 in reactions with isothiocyanates to obtain urea and thiourea derivatives. This methodology was previously used in 1987 to obtain mitomycin C derivatives [35], but none of the presented compounds exhibited significant activity against leukemia cells.

In the course of our studies, three aziridines 2a–c bearing different substituents ((S)-2-methyl, (S)-2-isopropyl, 2,2-dimethyl), were reacted with a series of isothiocyanates yielding expected products in high yields after 16 h (Figure 2,

Table 1. Yields of the new urea and thiourea derivatives 3a–3h.

Compound	R1	R2	R3	Yield (%)
3a	Bu	iPr	H	92
3b	Me	iPr	H	90
3c	cHex	iPr	H	89
3d	Me	Me	H	89
3e	Me	Me	Me	94
3f	cHex	Me	H	97
3g	cHex	Me	Me	96
3h	Allyl	iPr	H	76

) [30].

Structures of all new products were confirmed based on spectroscopic data (¹H-NMR, ¹³C-NMR, HR-MS). For example, the ¹H-NMR spectrum of thiourea 3a revealed the presence of two characteristic doublets at 2.17 and 2.51 ppm attributed to CH₂ group of aziridine ring and broad signal at 6.61 ppm attributed to NH group. In the ¹³C-NMR spectra absorbance of a C=S group was found at 197.9 ppm. Due to the fact that many aziridine alkaloids exhibit good antimicrobial activity against selected phatogens [10], we decided to test preliminary the antibacterial and cytotoxic activity of our aziridine derivatives. Based on the results obtained from biological analysis of 3a–3h compounds, we decided to confirm our preliminary conclusions regarding the biological role of some atoms and conformations in analyzed aziridine-containing agents by designing and synthesizing the next set of compounds.

In pursuit of the second goal, we synthesized aziridine-thiourea derivatives containing sterically crowded substituents, like benzyl (3i, 3j) and benzhydryl (3k, 3l). We also decided to include additional amine function in the aliphatic chain (compounds 3m–3p) as a modification of compound 3a. We also replaced sulfur atom in compounds 3a and 3c to check the influence of the oxygen atom in the new urea derivatives, and we also synthesized an analog of compound 3o with (R)-isopropylaziridine (

Table 2. Yields of the urea and thiourea derivatives 3i–3s.

Compound	R1	R2	X	Yield (%)
3i	CH2Ph	iPr	S	90
3j	CH2Ph	Me	S	89
3k	CHPh2	iPr	S	88
3l	CHPh2	Me	S	85
3m	2-(4-morpholino)ethyl	iPr	S	92
3n	2-(4-morpholino)ethyl	Me	S	93
3o	2-piperidinoethyl	iPr	S	95
(R)-3o	2-piperidinoethyl	iPr	S	90
3p	2-piperidinoethyl	Me	S	91
3r	Bu	iPr	O	96
3s	cHex	iPr	O	98

) to test if the configuration of the aziridine subunit had any significance to the biological activity. All new compounds were obtained according to a previously described procedure, only the reaction of (S)-2-isopropylaziridine 2b butylisocyanate and cyclohexylisocyanate gave the corresponding urea derivatives 3r, 3s in excellent yields after 30 min.

2.2. Biology

All compounds were tested for their antimicrobial activity against a representative panel of bacteria i.e., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Proteus vulgaris and Proteus mirabilis using nitrofurantoin, ampicillin and streptomycin as reference drugs. The in vitro antimicrobial activities of the compounds 3a–3h at concentrations ranging from 1 to 512 μg/mL were screened using the microdilution method. The results showed that two compounds 3g, 3h were inactive against all tested bacteria in analyzed concentrations. Six compounds, 3a–3f, showed antibacterial activity against Gram-positive strains (MIC value ranging from 16 to 512 μg/mL), however, lower than the reference drugs, and were inactive against P. aeruginosa and Proteus strains. The in vitro results of antibacterial activity of these compounds are presented in

Table 3. In vitro antibacterial activity of 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3f expressed as a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (µg/mL) and a minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) (µg/mL). AMP: ampicillin, NTF: nitrofurantoin, STR: streptomycin.

Tested Strain	E. coli NCTC 8196 NCTC 8196		S. aureus ATCC 6538 ATCC 6538		S. aureus ATCC 29213 ATCC 29213		S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 ATCC 12228
Compound	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC
3a	>512	nd	32	128	32	128	32	64
3b	32	32	32	64	32	64	16	16
3c	>512	nd	32	64	32	64	32	64
3d	128	128	256	512	256	512	256	512
3e	>512	nd	128	128	128	128	128	128
3f	256	512	16	128	16	128	16	16
NTF	8	8	16	32	16	32	8	8
AMP	4	4	1	1	2	4	1	1
STR	1	2	1	1	1	2	>512	>512

Note: nd—not determined.

as a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and a minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC).

Among Gram-positive species, the most sensitive to all of the active compounds were two strains of S. aureus and S. epidermidis. The most effective against these strains were compounds 3a, 3b, 3c, 3f (MIC = 16–32 µg/mL) although their activities were lower than those exhibited by ampicillin and streptomycin which are the antibiotics commonly used in the therapy of staphylococcal infections. Among six tested compounds, 3b was the only effective agent against E. coli reference strain (MIC = 32 µg/mL). 3f was the most active compound especially against Gram-positive strains with activity similar to nitrofurantoin (MIC = 16 µg/mL), however, in case of S. aureus strains, its activity was more bacteriostatic than bactericidal with high MBC value (MBC = 128 µg/mL) while other agents showed bactericidal activity (MBC/MIC = 2 or 3, respectively). Compounds 3d and 3e showed lower antibacterial activity than other compounds with MIC= 128–256 µg/mL. Our observations suggest that 2,2-dimethyl substituent at R² position of aziridine significantly reduces antibacterial activity (Table 3, see data 3e vs. 3b and 3g vs. 3c). The most potent derivatives were aziridines with (S)-2-methyl or (S)-2-isopropyl moiety at R² however their activity also depended on the type of substituent at R¹ position. For R¹-methyl derivatives the replacement of (S)-2-methyl with (S)-2-isopropyl group highly increased antibacterial activity (4–8 fold) (Table 2, see data 3d vs. 3b). On the other hand, for R¹-cyclohexyl derivatives the replacement of (S)-2-methyl with (S)-2-isopropyl did not have such significant consequences, however, compound 3f with (S)-2-methyl group showed two-fold stronger antimicrobial activity than 3c.

Considering good activity of the tested compounds, especially 3a, 3b, 3c, 3f, against Staphylococcus spp., a set of 12 S. aureus clinical strains including the ones isolated from two typical sources such as naso-pharynx (carrier state) and ulcers/furuncles (skin and soft tissue infections), but also those from infected bones (invasive infections) were tested against these agents. S. aureus D15 and D17 strains were characterized as MRSA due to their resistance to high concentrations of oxacillin. Similarly to the reference Staphylococcus spp. Strains, clinical isolates displayed high level of susceptibility to the analyzed compounds (MIC ranging from 16 to 64 µg/mL,

Table 4. In vitro activity of 3a, 3b, 3c, 3f against clinical isolates of S. aureus expressed as the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (µg/mL) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) (µg/mL). OX: oxacillin, AMP: ampicillin, NTF: nitrofurantoin, STR: streptomycin.

Compound	3a		3b		3c		3f		OX		AMP		NTF		STR
Tested Strain	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC
	naso-pharynx isolates
S. aureus
C4	32	64	32	64	32	64	16	16	0.25	0.25	512	512	16	16	8	8
C7	32	64	32	32	32	64	16	16	0.25	0.25	64	128	16	16	8	16
C8	32	64	32	32	32	64	16	16	0.25	0.25	512	>512	16	16	8	16
C19	32	64	32	32	32	64	16	16	0.5	0.5	64	128	32	32	8	8
	ulcers/furuncles isolates
D12	32	64	16	32	32	128	8	16	0.5	0.5	256	256	32	32	8	16
F1	32	64	32	128	64	128	16	64	0.25	0.25	128	128	32	32	8	8
F7	32	64	32	128	32	64	16	64	0.25	0.25	4	4	16	16	8	16
F12	32	64	16	32	32	64	8	16	0.25	0.25	64	128	16	32	8	32
	bone isolates
D14	32	64	32	32	32	64	16	16	0.5	0.5	256	512	32	32	8	16
D15 (MRSA)	32	64	32	32	32	64	16	16	>512	>512	>512	>512	32	32	256	>512
D17 (MRSA)	32	64	16	16	32	64	8	32	>512	>512	>512	>512	32	32	256	>512
D20	32	64	32	32	64	128	16	64	0.5	0.5	128	256	16	32	8	8

).

Again, compound 3f showed the strongest activity, with MIC being equal to 8–16 µg/mL for all of the tested clinical isolates, which for most of the strains was a better result than in case of ampicillin and nitrofurantoin (used as positive control drugs). On the other hand, the other common antibiotics oxacillin and streptomycin were the most active in almost all cases, except for the two MRSA strains isolated from bones (S. aureus D15, and D17, which were 16–32 times more sensitive to 3f compound and 8–16 times to 3a, 3b, 3c compounds. For all four tested compounds, the MBC values were in a similar range, suggesting their bactericidal activity (MBC/MIC = 2).

Many aziridine-containing compounds are known to demonstrate strong anticancer activity. The cytotoxic activities of 3a–3f were assessed using L929 murine cell line (recommended by the International Standard ISO 10993:2009 for evaluation of cytotoxic activities) as well as HeLa human tumor cell line. The percentage of viability inhibition compared to the negative control in which cells were grown in the absence of tested compounds was estimated for concentrations ranging from 2 to 256 µg/mL of the compound. A common antitumor drug, cisplatin, was used as a positive control. Compounds 3d and 3e showed weak cytotoxic effect on both tested cell lines and their activity was ~30-fold lower than for cisplatin (

Table 5. Cytotoxic activity data.

Compound	IC30 (µg/mL)/(µM) L929 Cells	HeLa Cells
3a	68/340	83/388
3b	27/171	28/177
3c	34/147	69/304
3d	>250/>1922	>250/1922
3e	214/1485	250/1735
3f	20/102	22/111
Cisplatin	7.24/24	6.53/22

, Figure 3 and Figure 4). The most toxic were compounds which were the most bactericidal as well (3b, 3f) with IC₃₀ = 20–28 µg/mL which is only nearly three-fold lower activity than in case of cisplatin however, they showed no selectivity against tumor cells.

Eleven new compounds, 3i–3s, were tested for their antimicrobial activity against the same reference panel of bacteria and again using nitrofurantoin, ampicillin and streptomycin as reference drugs. The in vitro antimicrobial activities of the compounds 3i–3s at concentrations ranging from 1 to 512 μg/mL were screened using the microdilution method. The results showed that five compounds 3i, 3n, 3r, 3s and (R)-3o were completely inactive against all tested bacteria in analyzed concentrations. Interestingly, both urea derivatives had no biological activity compared to their thiourea analogs (Table 2 and

Table 6. In vitro antibacterial activity of 3j, 3k, 3l, 3m, 3o, 3p expressed as a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (µg/mL). AMP: ampicillin, NTF: nitrofurantoin, STR: streptomycin.

Tested Strain	E. coli NCTC 8196 NCTC 8196	S. aureus ATCC 6538 ATCC 6538	S. aureus ATCC 29213 ATCC 29213	S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 ATCC 12228
Compound	MIC (µg/mL)
3j	256	128	128	128
3k	256	na*	Na	256
3l	256	256	256	256
3m	na	128	256	128
3o	64	8	8	4
3p	256	64	64	64
NTF	8	16	16	8
AMP	4	1	2	1
STR	1	1	1	>512

na*—no activity.

, see data 3r vs. 3a and 3s vs. 3c) which suggests that the sulphur atom is a principal factor for antibacterial properties. Moreover, an analog of compound 3o with (R)-isopropylaziridine also had no significant biological activity which confirmed that configuration of the aziridine plays an important role for evolving antimicrobial profiles. Six compounds 3j–3o and 3p showed antibacterial activity mainly against Gram-positive strains (MIC value ranging from 4 to 256 μg/mL) and were inactive against P. aeruginosa and Proteus strains. The in vitro results of antibacterial activity of these compounds are presented in Table 6 as a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). For the two most active compounds 3o and 3p minimal bactericidal concentration was also determined (

Table 7. In vitro antibacterial activity of 3o and 3p expressed as a minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) (µg/mL).

Tested Strain	E. coli NCTC 8196 NCTC 8196	S. aureus ATCC 6538 ATCC 6538	S. aureus ATCC 29213 ATCC 29213	S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 ATCC 12228
Compound	MBC (µg/mL)
3o	128	16	16	8
3p	256	128	128	128

). For both compounds, the MBC values were in the similar range as MIC, suggesting their bactericidal activity (MBC/MIC = 2 or 3).

Considering good activity of these two compounds against S. aureus reference strains, we used a set of 12 S. aureus clinical strains to test antibacterial activity of 3o and 3p. Our results revealed satisfactory activity only in case of compound 3o with MIC being equal to 32 µg/mL for all of the tested clinical isolates, which, for most of the strains, was a better result than in case of ampicillin. Moreover, two MRSA strains isolated from bones (S. aureus D15, and D17 were 8–16 times more sensitive to 3o compound. For both tested compounds, the MBC values were in the similar range, suggesting their bactericidal activity (MBC/MIC = 2,

Table 8. In vitro activity of 3o and 3p against clinical isolates of S. aureus expressed as a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (µg/mL) and a minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) (µg/mL). OX: oxacillin, AMP: ampicillin, NTF: nitrofurantoin, STR: streptomycin.

Compound	3o		3p		OX		AMP		NTF		STR
Tested Strain	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC	MIC	MBC
naso-pharynx isolates
S. aureus
C4	32	64	256	256	0.25	0.25	512	512	16	16	8	8
C7	32	64	256	256	0.25	0.25	64	128	16	16	8	16
C8	32	64	256	256	0.25	0.25	512	>512	16	16	8	16
C19	32	64	256	256	0.5	0.25	64	128	32	32	8	8
ulcers/furuncles isolates
D12	32	64	256	256	0.5	0.5	256	256	32	32	8	16
F1	32	64	256	256	0.25	0.25	128	128	32	32	8	8
F7	32	64	256	256	0.25	0.25	4	4	16	16	8	16
F12	32	64	256	256	0.25	0.25	64	128	16	32	8	32
bone isolates
D14	32	64	256	256	0.5	0.5	256	512	32	32	8	16
D15 (MRSA)	32	64	256	512	>512	>512	>512	>512	32	32	256	>512
D17 (MRSA)	32	64	256	512	>512	>512	>512	>512	32	32	256	>512
D20	32	64	256	512	0.5	0.5	128	256	16	32	8	8

).

As in the case of previous compounds, the cytotoxic activities of 3o–3p were assessed using L929 murine cell line as well as HeLa human tumor cell line. The percentage of viability inhibition compared to the negative control in which cells were grown in the absence of tested compounds was estimated for concentrations ranging from 2 to 128 µg/mL of the compound. Compound 3o was more toxic (IC₃₀ = 42–45 µg/mL), with cytotoxicity about two-fold higher than 3p (

Table 9. Cytotoxic activity data.

Compound	IC30 (µg/mL)/(µM) L929 Cells	HeLa Cells
3o	45/187	42/174
3p	103/483	71/333
Cisplatin	7.24/24	6.53/22

, Figure 5 and Figure 6). However, 3o seemed to be harmless for cells in a concentration corresponding to its antibacterial activity. Both compounds showed no selectivity against tumor cells.

To date, many anticancer agents have been found to show antimicrobial activity against several bacterial pathogens. Among them, mitomycin C as well as other aziridine derivatives have been tested. It is believed that, like in case of their anticancer activity, these compounds act mainly as alkylating agents also in bacterial cells. For example, mitomycin C which was found to be passively transported into the cells, may be used not only for killing metabolically active bacteria but also act against dormant presister cells, leading to formation of DNA crosslinks [36]. However, despite this typical crosslinking activity of aziridine derivatives, other possible modes of antibacterial action cannot be excluded. For example, naturally occurring aziridine derivative (2S,3S)-aziridine-2,3-dicarboxylic acid was found to inhibit the activity of E. coli aspartase [37]. We presume that the mechanism of action of the aziridine derivatives described in this paper may be typical as for the other members of this group of compounds, however, on the basis of this study, it is too early to predict it.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Chemistry

General: Melting points were determined in a capillary using a STUART SMP30 and were uncorrected. The ¹H- (600 MHz), ¹³C{1H}- (150 MHz) spectra were measured on a Bruker Avance III instrument (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) using solvent signals as reference. Chemical shifts (δ) are given in ppm and coupling constants J in Hz. Assignments of signals in¹³C-NMR spectra were made on the basis of HMQC experiments. HR-MS: Bruker Esquire LC spectrometers (Bruker Daltonics). All solvents are commercially available reagents and were used as received. Aziridines 2a–c were obtained according to a published procedure [34].

3.2. General Procedure for Synthesis of Urea and Thiourea Derivatives 3

To a stirred solution of an aziridine 2 (1 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) at 20 °C, an equimolar quantity of the isocyanate or isothiocyanate was slowly added. The mixture was stirred for 16 h at room temperature (3a–p), or 30 min (3r, 3s), the solution was concentrated and the resulting mixture was purified by flash chromatography (SiO₂/CH₂Cl₂).

(2S)-N-Butyl-2-isopropyl-aziridine-1-carbothioamide (3a): colorless crystals; yield: 92%; m.p. 71–72 °C (MeOH). ¹H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 6.61 (1H, br. s, NH); 3.61–3.57 (2H, m, N-CH₂); 2.51 (1H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, CH₂); 2.31–2.28 (1H, m, aziridine CH); 2.17 (1H, d, J = 4.2 Hz, CH₂); 1.63–1.35 (5H, m); 1.07 (3H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, CH₃); 0.98 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, CH₃); 0.95 (3H, t, J = 1.8 Hz, butyl CH₃). ¹³C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 197.9 (C=S); 48.9 (aziridine CH); 45.8 (N-CH₂); 34.8 (aziridine CH₂); 30.8 (CH); 30.6, 20.1 (2 CH₂); 20.0, 19.3 (2 CH₃); 13.7 (butyl CH₃). HR-EI-MS: 200.1350 (M⁺, C₁₀H₂₀N₂S⁺; calcd. 200.1347).

(2S)-2-Isopropyl-N-methyl-aziridine-1-carbothioamide (3b): colorless crystals; yield: 90%; m.p. 65–66 °C (MeOH). ¹H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 6.67 (1H, br. s, NH); 3.16 (3H, d, J = 5.4 Hz, N-CH₃); 2.55 (1H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, CH₂); 2.37–2.33 (1H, m, aziridine CH); 2.21 (1H, d, J = 4.2 Hz, CH₂); 1.62–1.55 (1H, m, isopropyl CH); 1.10 (3H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, CH₃); 1.01 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, CH₃). ¹³C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 198.2 (C=S); 48.9 (aziridine CH); 34.9 (aziridine CH₂); 33.2 (N-CH₃); 30.8 (CH); 20.0, 19.4 (2 CH₃). HR-EI-MS: 158.0879 (M⁺, C₇H₁₄N₂S⁺; calcd. 158.0878).

(2S)-N-Cyclohexyl-2-isopropyl-aziridine-1-carbothioamide (3c): colorless crystals; yield: 89%; m.p. 75–76 °C (MeOH). ¹H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 6.60 (1H, br. s, NH); 4.18–4.16 (1H, m, N-CH); 2.49 (1H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, aziridine CH₂); 2.29–2.26 (1H, m, aziridine CH); 2.07 (1H, d, J = 4.2 Hz, aziridine CH₂); 2.06–2.04 (2H, m, cyclohexyl CH₂); 1.72–1.37 (6H, m); 1.24–1.17 (3H, m); 1.07 (3H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, CH₃); 0.98 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, CH₃). ¹³C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 197.7 (C=S); 54.1 (cyclohexyl CH); 48.9 (aziridine CH); 34.9 (aziridine CH₂); 33.6, 33.4, 25.6, 25.5, 24.7 (5 CH₂); 30.9 (CH); 20.0, 19.3 (2 CH₃). HR-EI-MS: 226.1500 (M⁺, C₁₂H₂₂N₂S⁺; calcd. 226.1504).

(2S)-N-Methyl-2-methyl-aziridine-1-carbothioamide (3d): colorless crystals; yield: 89%; m.p. 70–71 °C (MeOH). ¹H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 6.81 (1H, br. s, NH); 3.07 (3H, s, N-CH₃); 2.54–2.52 (1H, m, CH); 2.46 (1H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, CH₂); 2.07 (1H, d, J = 4.2 Hz, CH₂); 1.25 (3H, d, J = 5.4 Hz, aziridine CH₃). ¹³C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 198.5 (C=S); 38.2 (aziridine CH); 37.0 (aziridine CH₂); 33.2 (N-CH₃); 17.6 (aziridine CH₃). HR-EI-MS: 130.0569 (M⁺, C₅H₁₀N₂S⁺; calcd. 130.0565).

(2S)-N-Methyl-2,2-dimethyl-aziridine-1-carbothioamide (3e): colorless crystals; yield: 94%; m.p. 77–78 °C (MeOH). ¹H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 6.39 (1H, br. s, NH); 3.10 (3H, d, J = 5.4 Hz, N-CH₃); 2.40 (2H, s, CH₂); 1.23 (6H, s, 2 aziridine CH₃). ¹³C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 195.8 (C=S); 42.5 (aziridine CH₂); 33.2 (N-CH₃); 22.4 (aziridine CH₃). HR-EI-MS: 144.0722 (M⁺, C₆H₁₂N₂S⁺; calcd. 144.0721).

(2S)-N-Cyclohexyl-2-methyl-aziridine-1-carbothioamide (3f): colorless crystals; yield: 97%; m.p. 68–67 °C (MeOH). ¹H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 6.52 (1H, br. s, NH); 4.12–4.08 (1H, m, N-CH); 2.54–2.51 (1H, m, aziridine CH); 2.42 (1H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, aziridine CH₂); 2.07 (1H, d, J = 4.2 Hz, aziridine CH₂); 2.06–1.20 (10H, m); 1.25 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH₃). ¹³C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 198.7 (C=S); 54.2 (cyclohexyl CH); 38.0 (aziridine CH); 36.9 (aziridine CH₂); 33.6, 33.4, 25.6, 25.5, 24.7 (5 CH₂); 17.5 (aziridine CH₃). HR-EI-MS: 198.1198 (M⁺, C₁₀H₁₈N₂S⁺; calcd. 198.1191).

(2S)-N-Cyclohexyl-2,2-dimethyl-aziridine-1-carbothioamide (3g): colorless crystals; yield: 96%; m.p. 76–77 °C (MeOH). ¹H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 6.24 (1H, br. s, NH); 4.19–4.13 (1H, m, N-CH); 2.38 (2H, s, aziridine CH₂); 2.03–1.23 (10H, m); 1.15 (6H, s, 2 CH₃). ¹³C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 192.8 (C=S); 54.5 (cyclohexyl CH); 42.1 (aziridine CH₂); 33.3, 32.5, 25.5, 25.2, 24.8 (5 CH₂); 22.0 (aziridine CH₃). HR-EI-MS: 212.1351 (M⁺, C₁₁H₂₀N₂S⁺; calcd. 212.1347).

(2S)-N-Allyl-2-isopropyl-aziridine-1-carbothioamide (3h): colorless crystals; yield: 76%; m.p. 65–66 °C (MeOH). ¹H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 6.56 (1H, br. s, NH); 5.86–5.80 (2H, m, CH₂=); 5.20–5.16 (1H, m, CH=); 4.19–4.17 (allyl CH₂); 2.46 (1H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, CH₂); 2.28–2.25 (1H, m, CH); 2.14 (1H, d, J = 4.2 Hz, CH₂); 1.53–1.47 (1H, m); 1.01 (3H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, CH₃); 0.92 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, CH₃). ¹³C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 198.1 (C=S); 132.7 (CH₂=); 117.6 (CH=); 48.9 (aziridine CH); 48.3 (CH₂); 34.9 (aziridine CH₂); 30.8 (isopropyl CH); 20.0, 19.0 (2 aziridine CH₃). HR-EI-MS: 184.1039 (M⁺, C₉H₁₆N₂S⁺; calcd. 184.1034).

(2S)-N-Cyclohexyl-2-isopropyl-aziridine-1-carboxamide (3s): colorless crystals; yield: 96%; m.p. 74–75 °C (MeOH). ¹H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 5.16 (1H, br. s, NH); 3.57–3.55 (1H, m, N-CH); 2.30 (1H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, aziridine CH₂); 2.10–2.07 (1H, m, aziridine CH); 1.92–1.85 (2H, m, cyclohexyl CH₂); 1.82 (1H, d, J = 4.2 Hz, aziridine CH₂); 1.70–1.67, 1.61–1.57 (4H, 2 m, 2 cyclohexyl CH₂); 1.42–1.31 (3H, m, isopropyl CH, cyclohexyl CH₂); 1.18–1.12 (2H, m, cyclohexyl CH₂);1.04 (3H, d, J = 6.6 Hz, CH₃); 0.96 (3H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, CH₃). ¹³C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl₃, δ, ppm): 163.1 (C=O); 54.5 (cyclohexyl CH); 45.9 (aziridine CH); 33.6, 33.4, 25.6, 25.5, 24.7 (5 CH₂); 31.8 (aziridine CH₂); 30.8 (CH); 20.0, 19.3 (2 CH₃). HR-EI-MS: 210.1734 (M⁺, C₁₂H₂₂N₂O⁺; calcd. 210.1732).

3.3. Biology

3.3.1. Antibacterial Assay

The in vitro antimicrobial activity of newly synthesized compounds was evaluated against the reference strains of Gram-negative (Escherichia coli NCTC 8196, Proteus vulgaris ATCC 49990, Proteus mirabilis ATCC 29906, Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCTC 6249), and Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228) bacterial species. Moreover, the most active (against the reference strains) compounds were examined against a set of twelve clinical isolates of S. aureus received from the collection of the Chair of Immunology and Infectious Biology, University of Łódź. These strains were isolated from the following three sources: naso-pharynx of young patients hospitalized at Children’s Hospital in Łódź (n = 4), ulcers and furuncles from adult patients of Dermatological Clinic in Łódź (n = 4), and from infected bones of patients hospitalized at Oncological Hospital in Łódź (n = 4). All strains were kept frozen at −80 °C on Tryptic Soy Broth with 15% of glycerol until testing. Before using, S. aureus strains were subcultured on blood agar and identified by routine methods (catalase, coagulase and clumping factor). Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined as the lowest concentration of the compound preventing growth of the tested microorganism using microdilution method according to EUCAST guidelines. The inoculum density was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard. All of the tested compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Concentration of the agents evaluated in Mueller-Hinton broth ranged from 1 to 512 µg/mL. DMSO at the final concentration in the medium had no influence on growth of the tested microorganisms. The incubation was carried out at 37 °C for 18 h and optical density (OD₆₀₀) measurements were determined for bacterial cultures in the presence and absence of the tested compounds. Ampicillin, nitrofurantoin, and streptomycin widely used in the treatment of infectious diseases were used as positive control antimicrobial agents. Minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC), defined as the lowest concentration of a compound that resulted in >99.9% reduction in CFU of the initial inocula (2 × 10⁸ cfu) was assessed only for compounds 3c–3h and 3o, 3p. MBC was determined by a broth microdilution technique followed by plating out the contents of the wells that showed no visible growth of bacteria onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates and incubating at 35 °C for 18 h. Both MIC and MBC evaluations were performed in triplicates and are given in µg/mL.

3.3.2. Cytotoxicity Assay

Cytotoxic effect of compounds 3c–3h and 3o, 3p on host cells was detected by determining cellular viability using MTT reduction assay. Murine fibroblasts L929 cells (ATTC^® catalog No. CCL-1, mouse fibroblasts) or human tumor HeLa cells (ATTC^® catalog No. CCL-2™, human epithelial cells) were plated in 96-well microplates at density of 1 × 10⁴ cells/mL (100 μL per well) and cultivated in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM), supplemented with 100.0 U/mL penicillin and streptomycin, 5 × 10⁻⁵ M 2-mercaptoethanol and enriched with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). After overnight incubation at 37 °C, the growth medium was removed and 100 μL of medium supplemented with different concentrations of synthetic compounds in the range of 1–300 µg/mL were added. Cells were further incubated for 24 h with tested agents. At the end of the incubation time, the medium was removed and MTT was added to each well at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL and plates were incubated for the next 2 h at 37 °C. Then, formazan crystals were solubilized in 150 μL DMSO. The optical density was measured at 550 nm. The results of experiments were shown as mean arithmetic values of eight repeats (two experiments) and the percentage of inhibition of viability compared to control wells was calculated for each concentration of the tested compounds and IC₃₀ value (which is considered to be save for tested cells) was determined in each case. The results of the experiments were shown as mean arithmetic values from 3 repeats in each of two independent experiments.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have reported the synthesis and preliminary evaluation of the biological activity of 19 novel urea and thiourea aziridine derivatives. While comparing the structure of tested compounds with the antibacterial and cytotoxic activity, we could already draw some substantial conclusions. The presence of sulphur atom is a principal factor for antibacterial properties of aziridine derivatives. The (S)-configuration of the aziridine plays an important role for conferring antimicrobial activity. All tested (S)-isopropylaziridine derivatives with 1-methyl (3b), 1-butyl (3a), 1-cyclohexyl (3c) and 1-(2-piperidinoethyl) (3o) substituents, showed similar satisfactory antibacterial results. The only exception was compound 3h with a 1-allyl moiety which can suggest that it decreases the antimicrobial activity. We have also observed that a 2,2-dimethyl moiety at C2 position of aziridine (3e, 3g) significantly reduces antibacterial activity. The most bactericidal aziridine derivatives of thiourea also showed the highest toxic activity against both cell lines with no selectivity for tumor cells. It can be explained by the alkylating activity of aziridine ring possessing agents and their in vivo potency based primarily on toxicity rather than specific activity. We selected five of the tested compounds 3a, 3b, 3c, 3f, 3o which showed the best activity against clinical S. aureus strains, and in two cases of invasive infections of MRSA, these agents exceeded the activity of commonly used antibiotics such as ampicillin, streptomycin and oxacillin by 16-fold. To conclude, all the collected data could provide valuable information for further modifications of these compounds in order to select those with stronger antibacterial activity which would be less harmful. Simultaneously, our attention will be also focused on the improvements leading to the increase of their selectivity against tumor cells, bearing in mind their potential usage in antitumor therapy.