Next Article in Journal
Purification and Characterization of Antioxidant Peptides of Pseudosciaena crocea Protein Hydrolysates
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Weak Base Addition to Hole-Collecting Buffer Layers in Polymer:Fullerene Solar Cells
Previous Article in Journal
A New Determination Method of the Solubility Parameter of Polymer Based on AIE
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of a Polymercaptan Material on the Electro-Optical Properties of Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystal Films

1
Department of Materials Physics and Chemistry, School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
3
Key Laboratory of Polymer Chemistry and Physics of Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
4
Department of Applied Statistics and Science, Xijing University, Xi’an 710123, Shaanxi Province, China
5
Department of Applied Mechanics, School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
6
College of Medical Laboratory, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, Liaoning Province, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2017, 22(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22010043
Submission received: 1 December 2016 / Revised: 21 December 2016 / Accepted: 27 December 2016 / Published: 30 December 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Organic Nanophotonics)

Abstract

:
Polymer-dispersed liquid crystal (PDLC) films were prepared by the ultraviolet-light-induced polymerization of photopolymerizable monomers in nematic liquid crystal/chiral dopant/thiol-acrylate reaction monomer composites. The effects of the chiral dopant and crosslinking agents on the electro-optical properties of the PDLC films were systematically investigate. While added the chiral dopant S811 into the PDLC films, the initial off-state transmittance of the films was decreased. It was found that the weight ratio among acrylate monomers, thiol monomer PETMP and the polymercaptan Capcure 3-800 showed great influence on the properties of the fabricated PDLC films because of the existence of competition between thiol-acrylate reaction and acrylate monomer polymerization reaction. While adding polymercaptans curing agent Capcure 3-800 with appropriate concentration into the PDLC system, lower driven voltage and higher contrast ratio were achieved. This made the polymer network and electro-optical properties of the PDLC films easily tunable by the introduction of the thiol monomers.

1. Introduction

Polymer-dispersed liquid crystal (PDLC) films that consist of micrometer-sized liquid crystal droplets dispersed in a polymer matrix are a kind of composite material [1,2,3]. PDLC films show transparent and light scattering states in the electric field-on and field-off states, respectively. In the electric field-off state, the refractive-index mismatch between the polymer matrix and the LC material gives rise to the light scattering of incident light. In the electric field-on state, the films become transparent because of the parallel alignment of the LC directors with the applied electric field if the refractive indices match between the LC droplets and polymer matrix [4]. The switching properties of the LC molecules within the domains depend on some variables, such as the size and shape of the domains, the molecular interactions between the LC material and the polymer matrix [5,6]. Unlike conventional liquid crystal (LC) displays, PDLC films are flexible, easy preparation, and there is no requirement for polarisers, alignment layers and precise control of the spacer between two substrates [7,8,9]. Recently, much attention has been devoted to PDLC systems due to their potential applications in electro-optical technology, such as switchable windows, flexible large-area displays, and other devices [10,11,12,13,14].
PDLCs can be fabricated by different methods, such as polymerization-induced phase separation (PIPS), thermally induced phase separation (TIPS), solvent-induced phase separation (SIPS) and microencapsulation process (MP) [15,16,17]. PIPS has been considered the most popular way, as it is quite convenient and allows for a high degree of control over the final properties of the PDLC films [18]. The matrixes in the PIPS can be cured from photo-initiated polymerization and thermally initiated polymerization monomers. The cure of the former can be finished in a few minutes at room temperature, whereas that of the latter is usually done for few hours at a higher temperature. In this situation, the PDLC films of which the matrixes made from photo-curable monomers have being attracted much attention.
To date, many researchers have focused on free radical systems based on (meth)acrylate monomers by the UV-initiated polymerization method [19], such as introducing fluorinated acrylates into PDLCs could reduce LC anchoring energy and subsequently lower switching voltage [20]. Until recently, Many research groups have studied allyl ether thiol-ene systems or vinyl ether thiol-ene systems for the polymer matrix to fabricate PDLC films [21,22], but there are no reports on acrylate monomer-thiol systems. Compared with the free radical systems based primarily on acrylates, the thiol-ene system has significant advantages: reduced oxygen polymerization, less light initiator dosage, excellent thermal insulation, high refractive index, inertness to oxidation and water resistance [23,24,25,26,27,28].
In this study, PDLC films were prepared by the ultraviolet-light-induced polymerization of photopolymerizable monomers in nematic liquid crystal/chiral dopant/thiol monomer composites. The effect of the chiral dopant and feed ratio of the thiol crosslinking agents on the electro-optical properties of the PDLC films was systematically investigate. It is important to mention that there were competition between acrylate monomer polymerization reaction and thiol-acrylate reaction due to the polymerization mechanism of thiol monomer. By optimizing the composition of samples, PDLC films with relative low driving voltage were achieved.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Morphology of the Polymer Network in the PDLC Films

Polymer-dispersed liquid crystal (PDLC) films were obtained by the PIPS process. The chemical structures and some physical properties of the materials are shown in Figure 1. In this study, the weight ratio between the acrylate monomer (TMHA) and diacrylate crosslinker monomer (BDDA) were fixed, but the concentration of chiral dopant S811 and feed ratio of the thiol crosslinking agents was changed (as shown in Table 1).
Figure 2 shows the polymer networks of samples A1A5 with different amounts of S811. For samples A1A5, it can be clearly seen that the LC domain size decreased with increasing the chiral dopant S811 content. It is well known the droplet size is controlled by the relative content of the photopolymerizable monomers and LC, the rate of polymerization, and some physical parameters such as the viscosity, rate of diffusion, and solubility of the LC in the polymer [29]. For a definite system, the relative content between photopolymerizable monomers and LC compound was fixed, but the concentration of chiral dopant was increased from sample A1 to A5. From sample A1 to sample A5, the content of S811 was 0, 1.0 wt %, 3.0 wt %, 5.0 wt %, 7.0 wt %, respectively. While increasing the S811 content caused the pitch to reduce, so the anchoring force from the polymer network on liquid crystals increases, and this resulted in the decreased LC droplet size.
Figure 3 shows the polymer networks of samples B1B7. It can be seen that the mesh size (the LC droplets size) of the polymer network initially shows a slight decrease as the ratio of Capcure 3-800 increased from 0 wt % to 3.0 wt %, followed by a obviously increasing tendency as the concentration of Capcure 3-800 increased from 5.0 wt % to 9.0 wt %, and finally the LC droplets size showed a slight decreasing trend. This phenomenon may be due to the polymerization mechanism of thiol monomer. During the free radical polymerization process, the thiol radical does not polymerize with other thiol monomers. When the initiating thiol radicals are formed, the only means for the radicals to propagate is through addition to monomers with carbon-carbon double bonds [21,22]. In this study, we used the thiol monomer Capcure 3-800 and acrylate monomers. There was thus a competition between the thiol-acrylate and acrylate monomer polymerization reactions. The latter include homopolymerization and copolymerization reactions. In this situation, the crosslinking density increased and the LC domain sizes decreased with added Capcure 3-800 content into PDLC films. Then, due to the competition between different monomers, the crosslinking density changed dramatically. When the content of Capcure 3-800 was increased, accompanying with the decreased concentration of acrylate monomers, the carbon-carbon double bond was not sufficient enough for polymerization, so the LC droplet size increased with the increasing ratio of Capcure 3-800. The results indicate that the concentration of the polymercaptans curing agent showed a great influence on the mesh size of the polymer network.
Figure 4 shows the SEM photos of the morphologies of the PDLC films with different ratios of Capcure 3-800/PETMP. In the group C samples, acrylate monomers contained monofunctional acrylate monomer (TMHA) and bifunctional acrylate crosslinking monomer (BDDA). The weight ratio between TMHA and BDDA were fixed, and the relative weight ratio of thiol monomers Capcure 3-800 and pentaerythritol tetra (3-mercaptopropionate) (PETMP) were changed. From sample C1 to sample C6, the LC domain size obviously decreases as the relative weight ratio of Capcure 3-800 increased from 0 wt % to 10.0 wt %. This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that the crosslinking density of PETMP is lower than that of Capcure 3-800, so the LC domain size would decrease as the Capcure 3-800 content increased. It is also shown that the polymer network of the PDLC film was significantly influenced by the relative ratios of the crosslinking agents.

2.2. Electro-Optical Properties of PDLC Films

Electro-optical properties are very important in the evaluation of PDLC films. As mentioned above, the content of thiol monomer and chiral dopant played important roles in the fabrication of the polymer network. Figure 5 show the transmittance-applied voltage curves of samples in groups A, B and C. With the applied voltage increased, the transmittance of the samples encompasses the initial off-state transmittance (To) and the saturation transmittance (Ts). As shown in Figure 5a,b, the sample B6 which prepared with 9.0 wt % of Capcure 3-800 and 3.0 wt % S811 presented better properties than the others, the electro-optical properties is also significantly influenced by the ratio of Capcure 3-800/PETMP in Figure 5c.
The driving voltage, which includes the threshold voltage (Vth) and the saturation voltage (Vsat). is the major performance parameter of the PDLC films. The threshold voltage is defined as the electric field required for the transmittance to reach 10% of Ts, while Vsat is the transmittance required to reach 90% of Ts. Generally, the threshold voltage Vth is a linear function of the reciprocal of the size of the droplets R according to:
V t h = d R [ k ( ω 2 1 ) ε o × Δ ε ] 1 2
The equation holds for droplets with tangential alignment of the director, where d, R, k, ω, εo and Δε represent film thickness, domain radius, the effective elastic constant, aspect ratio, vacuum permittivity and dielectric anisotropy of the LC, respectively [30,31]. Vth is inversely proportional to the LC domain size. The Vth and Vsat values of the samples are summarized in Figure 6a where with the increase of contents of S811, Vth gradually increased from 2.7 V to 58.1 V, and Vsat increased from 13.4 V to 58.6 V. This was in good agreement with the morphologies of the PDLC films shown in Figure 2. Driving voltage is inversely proportional to the radius of LC droplets. Smaller LC droplet size leads to higher Vth and Vsat. For a definite system, the helical pitch (P) is defined as:
P = 1 ( H T P ) x
where (HTP) is the helical twisting power of the chiral dopant, x is the chiral dopant concentration. Increasing chiral dopant S811 content caused the helical pitch to decrease, so the twist elastic energy in the free energy of bipolar droplets was increased, and it needed a larger electric field to reorient the droplets, therefore, Vth and Vsat of the PDLC films increased with the increasing content of S811.
Figure 6b shows threshold voltage (Vth) and saturation voltage (Vsat) of samples B1B7. With increasing the Capcure 3-800 content, Vsat of samples B1B6 decreased dramatically from 87.8 V to 47.6 V and Vth decreased from 29.2 V to 22.2 V. The Vth and Vsat of sample B7 are higher than that of sample B6 resulting from the decreasing size of the LC droplets in sample B7. This was in good agreement with the morphologies of the PDLC films in Figure 3. From Figure 3 it can be seen that with increasing the thiol monomer content, the mesh sizes presented a trend of initially increasing and decreasing in sequence, and finally they had a slight decreasing trend. Therefore, the size and shape of the LC droplets synergistically affect the electro-optical performance of the film.
Figure 6c shows threshold voltage (Vth) and saturation voltage (Vsat) of samples C1C6, where it can be see that the driving voltage of the PDLC were strongly influenced by the relative weight ratio of crosslinking agents. With increasing concentration of Capcure 3-800, the Vth and the Vsat gradually increased from 12.4 V to 22.7 V and from 35.1 V to 64.8 V, respectively. This was in good agreement with the morphologies of the corresponding PDLC films (see Figure 4). Vth and Vsat of the PDLC films increased with the decreasing LC domain size.
The contrast ratio (CR) is an important measure of the electro-optical performance in a PDLC system. The contrast ratio (CR) is commonly known as the switching contrast ratio. It characterizes the difference between the transparent state and the opaque state, which is defined as:
C R = T s / T o
Figure 7 shows the contrast ratio of all samples. From Figure 7a, it can be seen that as the content of S811 increased, the CR increased because the off-state transmittance (To) of the samples A1A5 decreased (Figure 5). Sample A1 without S811 had the highest off-state transmittance (To) value, but the low CR limits its practical application. Compared with the A1, the samples A2A5 of PDLC films have low To (Figure 5a). With the increase of the S811 content, the off-state transmittance (To) of the samples A2A5 decreased dramatically from 10.8% to 0.8%, while the saturation transmittance (Ts) initially remained the same, followed by a slight decrease. The results show that the samples which were prepared with a content of chiral dopant S811 of no more than 3.0 wt % had a slightly lower contrast ratio, but an appropriate polymer network leading to a high on-state transmittance and low threshold voltage (Vth), which are of great importance to the performance of the films. Hence, the optimum electro-optical properties of the PDLC films were obtained when the content of the chiral dopant was 3.0 wt %.
Figure 7b shows the CR of samples B1B7. It is well-known that off-state transmittance (To) of PDLC films depends greatly on LC domain size, with a not appropriate LC domain size results in insufficient scattering centers. As shown in Figure 7b, sample B3 with 3.0 wt % Capcure 3-800 had the highest CR value due to the strong light scattering from uniform droplets. However, the low saturation transmittance limits its practical application. As shown in Figure 5b with increasing Capcure 3-800 content, the off-state transmittance (To) decreased initially from samples B1 to B3, and then increased from samples B4 to B7, while the saturation transmittance (Ts) of the samples increased gradually from 51.2% to 82.7% (B1B3), then gradually increased from about 63.7% to 80.5% (B4B6), finally followed by a slight decrease in sample B7. Compared to other samples, sample B6 with 9.0 wt % Capcure 3-800 had a slightly lower contrast ratio, but it had appropriate polymer network leading to a higher on-state transmittance and lower threshold voltage (Vth), which are of great importance to the performance of the films. From Figure 7c, it can be seen that as the relative weight ratio of Capcure 3-800 increases, the CR of the samples C1C6 increased from 13.1 to 74.4. The sample C6 with 9.0 wt % Capcure 3-800 had the highest CR value due to the strong light scattering from unifrom and smaller LC droplets (as shown in Figure 4). The results show that the properties of PDLC films based on thiol/acrylate system could be optimized by tuning the concentration of the chiral dopant and thiol monomers.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

The nematic liquid crystal used in this study was SLC-1717 (Shijiazhuang Chengzhi Yonghua Display Material Co., Ltd. Shijiazhuang, China). The acrylate monomers is a mixture of 3,5,5-trimethelhexyl acrylate (TMHA, Sigma-Aldrich, 98%, Shanghai, China) and 1,4-butanedioldiacrylate (BDDA, Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., 98%, Tokyo, Japan). The chiral dopant was S811 (Merck Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The pentaerythritol tetra-(3-mercaptopropionate) (PETMP, J&K Scientific Ltd., 95%, Beijing China) and polymercaptan curing agent (Capcure 3-800, Shenzhen Jiadida Chemical Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) were used as the co-polymerized monomers. The photoinitiator was Irgacure 651 (Ciba Geigy, Jingjiang Hongtai Chem. Co., Ltd., Jingjiang, China). The chemical structures and some physical properties of the materials are shown in Figure 1.

3.2. Sample Preparation

PDLC films were obtained by the PIPS process. At first, ultraviolet-curable monomer/crosslinking agent/chiral dopant/liquid crystal (LC) composite was prepared. Then, the composite was sandwiched between two pieces of indium tin oxide (ITO), conductive plastic films. The distance between the slides was controlled by a polyethylene terephtalate spacer of 20.0 ± 1.0 μm thickness. After the composite was irradiated by UV light (365 nm 35 W Hg lamp, PS135, UV Flood, Stockholm, Sweden) for 5 min at 25 °C, the UV intensity at the cell surface was about 13.5 mW/cm2 at 365.0 nm, a polymer network (polymer matrix) was formed in the composite from the crosslinking between the molecules of the photopolymerizable monomers. Thus, PDLC films were prepared. The compositions of the samples are listed in Table 1.

3.3. Morphological Analysis

The morphology of the samples was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The films were first separated and dipped into hexane for 9 days at room temperature to extract the LC molecules, followed by drying for 10 h under vacuum. After the samples were sputtered with gold, the microstructure of the polymer network was observed under SEM.

3.4. Electro-Optical Measurements

The electro-optical property was measured using the LC device parameters tester (LCT-5016C, Changchun Liancheng Instrument Co., Ltd., Changchun, China). A halogen laser beam (λ = 560 nm) was used as the incident light source. The transmittance of the PDLC films was recorded by a photodiode. The response of the photodiode was monitored by a digital storage oscilloscope. An electric field square wave (100 Hz) was applied, and the distance between the PDLC film and photodiode was 300 mm. The collection angle of the transmitted intensity was about ±1° so that the forward scattering was mainly detected. The transmittance of air was normalized as 100%.

4. Conclusions

In summary, PDLC films based on thiol/acrylate monomers were prepared and characterized. The effects of the chiral dopant and crosslinking agents on the electro-optical properties of the PDLC films have been studied. The morphology of the PDLC films was strongly influenced by the chiral dopant S811 and polymercaptan curing agent Capcure 3-800. It was found that by adding appropriate concentrations of thiol monomer and chiral dopant into the PDLC system, lower driven voltages and higher contrast ratios were achieved. Compared with the PDLC films, S811 dopant resulted in a decrease in the off-state transmittance and an increase in light scattering. Due to the existence of competition between the thiol-acrylate and acrylate monomer polymerization reactions, the weight ratio among acrylate monomers, thiol monomer PETMP and the polymercaptan Capcure 3-800 showed great influence on the properties of the as-fabricated PDLC films. The results show that it is possible to tune the LC domain size and optimize the electro-optical properties of PDLC films by adjusting the chiral dopant and the weight ratio of thiol/acrylate.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant No. 51272026, Grant No. 51372029, Grant No. 51573003, Grant No. 51402006).

Author Contributions

Yujian Sun, Cuihong Zhang, Le Zhou and Hua Fang conceived and designed the experiments; Jianhua Huang, Haipeng Ma, Yi Zhang and Jie Yang performed the experiments; Lan-Ying Zhang, Ping Song and Yanzi Gao analyzed the data; Jiumei Xiao, Fasheng Li and Kexuan Li contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Yujian Sun and Cuihong Zhang wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cheng, Z.; Wang, T.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, H.F. NIR-VIS-UV light-responsive actuator films of polymer-dispersed liquid crystal/graphene oxide nanocomposites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 27494–27501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yu, L.; Cheng, Z.; Dong, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, H.F. Photomechanical response of polymer-dispersed liquid crystals/graphene oxide nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 8501–8506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Doane, J.W.; Golemme, A.; West, J.L.; Whitehead, J.B., Jr.; Wu, B.G. Polymer dispersed liquid crystals for display application. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1988, 165, 511–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Malik, P.; Raina, K.K. Droplet orientation and optical properties of polymer dispersed liquid crystal composite films. Opt. Mater. 2004, 27, 613–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kovalchuk, A.V.; Kurik, M.V.; Lavrentovich, O.D.; Sergan, V.V. Structural transformations in nematic drops located in an external electric-field. Sov. Phys. JETP 1988, 67, 1065–1073. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kovalchuk, A.V.; Lavrentovich, O.D.; Sergan, V.V. Kenetic of electrooptical effects in drops of nematic with different structure. Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett. 1989, 15, 529–533. [Google Scholar]
  7. Doane, J.W.; Vaz, N.A.; Wu, B.G.; Žumer, S. Field controlled light scattering from nematic microdroplets. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1986, 48, 269–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Higgins, D.A.; Hall, J.E.; Xie, A. Optical microscopy studies of dynamics within individual polymer-dispersed liquid crystal droplets. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lovinger, A.J.; Amundson, K.R.; Davis, D.D. Morphological investigation of UV-curable polymer-dispersed liquid-crystal (PDLC) materials. Chem. Mater. 1994, 6, 1726–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jain, S.C.; Thakur, R.S. Thermo-electro-optic switch based on polymer dispersed liquid crystal composite. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1992, 61, 1641–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Drzaic, P.S. Polymer dispersed nematic liquid crystal for large area displays and light valves. J. Appl. Phys. 1986, 60, 2142–2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Sun, Y.; Yang, H.; Yu, H.F. Erasable thin-film optical diode based on a photoresponsive liquid crystal polymer. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 3854–3860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kurihara, S.; Masumoto, K.; Nonaka, T. Optical shutter driven photochemically from anisotropic polymer network containing liquid crystalline and azobenzene molecules. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 73, 160–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, L.; He, W.; Xiao, X.; Wang, M.; Wang, M.; Yang, P.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, H.; Yu, H.F.; Lu, Y. Low voltage and hysteresis-free blue phase liquid crystal dispersed by ferroelectric nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 19629–19633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, S.H.; Heo, C.P.; Park, K.S.; Kim, B.K. Effect of prepolymer structure on the electro-optic performance of polymer dispersed liquid crystals. Polym. Int. 1998, 46, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, W.; Cao, H.; Kashima, M.; Liu, F.; Cheng, Z.; Yang, Z.; Zhu, S.; Yang, H. Control of the microstructure of polymer network and effects of the microstructures on light scattering properties of UV-cured polymer-dispersed liquid crystal films. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 46, 2090–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tao, H.J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.L.; Gao, J. Phase separation and polymer crystallization in a poly (4-methyl-1-pentene)-dioctylsebacate-dimethylphthalate system via thermally induced phase separation. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2007, 45, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, J.H.; Wu, F.T. Synthesis of photoisomeric azobenzene monomers and model compound effect on electric-optical properties in PDLC films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 97, 721–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, F.; Cao, H.; Mao, Q.; Song, P.; Yang, H. Effects of monomer structure on the morphology of polymer networks and the electro-optical properties of polymer-dispersed liquid crystal films. Liq. Cryst. 2012, 39, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schulte, M.D.; Clarson, S.J.; Natarajan, L.V.; Tomlin, D.W.; Bunning, T.J. The effect of fluorine-substituted acrylate monomers on the electro-optical and morphological properties of polymer dispersed liquid crystals. Liq. Cryst. 2000, 27, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Senyurt, A.F.; Warren, G.; Whitehead, J.B., Jr.; Hoyle, C.E. Matrix physical structure effect on the electro-optic characteristics of thiol-ene based H-PDLC films. Polymer 2006, 47, 2741–2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. White, T.J.; Natarajan, L.V.; Tondiglia, V.P.; Bunning, T.J.; Guymon, C.A. Polymerization kinetics and monomer functionality effects in thiol-ene polymer dispersed liquid crystals. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 1112–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hoyle, C.E.; Lee, T.Y.; Roper, T. Thiol–enes: chemistry of the past with promise for the future. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2004, 42, 5301–5338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Morgan, C.R.; Magnotta, F.; Ketley, A.D. Thlol/ene photocurable polymers. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 1977, 15, 627–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cramer, N.B.; Scott, J.P.; Bowman, C.N. Photopolymerizations of thiol-ene polymers without photoinitiators. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 5361–5365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Szczepanski, C.R.; Pfeifer, C.S.; Stansbury, J.W. A new approach to network heterogeneity: polymerization induced phase separation in photo-initiated, free-radical methacrylic systems. Polymer 2012, 53, 4694–4701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kade, M.J.; Burke, D.J.; Hawker, C.J. The power of thiol-ene chemistry. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2010, 48, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Northrop, B.H.; Coffey, R.N. Thiol−ene click chemistry: computational and kinetic analysis of the influence of alkene functionality. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13804–13817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mucha, M. Polymer as an important component of blends and composites with liquid crystals. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2003, 28, 837–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jain, S.C.; Rout, D.K. Electro-optic response of polymer dispersed liquid crystal films. J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 70, 6988–6992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wu, B.G.; Erdmann, J.H.; Doane, J.W. Response times and voltages for PDLC light shutters. Liq. Cryst. 1989, 5, 1453–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the PDLC films are available from the authors.
Figure 1. The chemical structures of the materials used. 1 is the monomer, 2 is the cholesteric LC, 3 is the photo-initiator.
Figure 1. The chemical structures of the materials used. 1 is the monomer, 2 is the cholesteric LC, 3 is the photo-initiator.
Molecules 22 00043 g001
Figure 2. SEM micrographs of the polymer networks of the samples A1A5.
Figure 2. SEM micrographs of the polymer networks of the samples A1A5.
Molecules 22 00043 g002
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of the polymer networks of the samples B1B7.
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of the polymer networks of the samples B1B7.
Molecules 22 00043 g003
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of the polymer networks of the samples C1C6.
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of the polymer networks of the samples C1C6.
Molecules 22 00043 g004
Figure 5. (a) The transmittance-applied voltage curves of group A; (b) the transmittance-applied voltage curves of group B; (c) the transmittance-applied voltage curves of group C.
Figure 5. (a) The transmittance-applied voltage curves of group A; (b) the transmittance-applied voltage curves of group B; (c) the transmittance-applied voltage curves of group C.
Molecules 22 00043 g005
Figure 6. (a) Threshold voltage (Vth) and saturation voltage (Vsat) of samples A1A5; (b) threshold voltage (Vth) and saturation voltage (Vsat) of samples B1B7; (c) threshold voltage (Vth) and saturation voltage (Vsat) of samples C1C6.
Figure 6. (a) Threshold voltage (Vth) and saturation voltage (Vsat) of samples A1A5; (b) threshold voltage (Vth) and saturation voltage (Vsat) of samples B1B7; (c) threshold voltage (Vth) and saturation voltage (Vsat) of samples C1C6.
Molecules 22 00043 g006
Figure 7. (a) The contrast ratio (CR) of samples A1A5; (b) the contrast ratio (CR) of samples B1B7; (c) the contrast ratio (CR) of samples C1C6.
Figure 7. (a) The contrast ratio (CR) of samples A1A5; (b) the contrast ratio (CR) of samples B1B7; (c) the contrast ratio (CR) of samples C1C6.
Molecules 22 00043 g007
Table 1. The compositions of samples.
Table 1. The compositions of samples.
SampleMonomers (20.0 wt %)LC (80.0 wt %)
Composition of Monomers
Group ATMHA + BDDAa/Capcure 3-800SLC1717/S811
A111.0/9.080.0/-
A211.0/9.079.0/1.0
A311.0/9.077.0/3.0
A411.0/9.075.0/5.0
A511.0/9.073.0/7.0
Group BTMHA + BDDA a/Capcure 3-800SLC1717/S811
B120.0/-77.0/3.0
B219.0/1.077.0/3.0
B317.0/3.077.0/3.0
B415.0/5.077.0/3.0
B513.0/7.077.0/3.0
B611.0/9.077.0/3.0
B79.0/11.077.0/3.0
Group CTMHA + BDDA aCapcure 3-800/PETMPSLC1717/S811
C110.0-/10.077.0/3.0
C210.02.0/8.077.0/3.0
C310.04.0/6.077.0/3.0
C410.06.0/4.077.0/3.0
C510.08.0/2.077.0/3.0
C610.010.0/-77.0/3.0
a monomer mixture (TMHA + BDDA): TMHA/BDDA = 4/1 (by wt %).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, L.; Fang, H.; Huang, J.; Ma, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhang, L.-Y.; Song, P.; et al. Effect of a Polymercaptan Material on the Electro-Optical Properties of Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystal Films. Molecules 2017, 22, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22010043

AMA Style

Sun Y, Zhang C, Zhou L, Fang H, Huang J, Ma H, Zhang Y, Yang J, Zhang L-Y, Song P, et al. Effect of a Polymercaptan Material on the Electro-Optical Properties of Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystal Films. Molecules. 2017; 22(1):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22010043

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Yujian, Cuihong Zhang, Le Zhou, Hua Fang, Jianhua Huang, Haipeng Ma, Yi Zhang, Jie Yang, Lan-Ying Zhang, Ping Song, and et al. 2017. "Effect of a Polymercaptan Material on the Electro-Optical Properties of Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystal Films" Molecules 22, no. 1: 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22010043

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop