Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant Property of Coffee Components: Assessment of Methods that Define Mechanisms of Action
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis, Anticancer and Antibacterial Activity of Salinomycin N-Benzyl Amides
Previous Article in Journal
Spectral and Kinetic Properties of Radicals Derived from Oxidation of Quinoxalin-2-One and Its Methyl Derivative
Previous Article in Special Issue
Essential Oil of Eucalyptus Gunnii Hook. As a Novel Source of Antioxidant, Antimutagenic and Antibacterial Agents
Article Menu

Export Article

Molecules 2014, 19(11), 19172-19179; doi:10.3390/molecules191119172

Article
Anti-Cholinesterase Activity of Lycopodium Alkaloids from Vietnamese Huperzia squarrosa (Forst.) Trevis
1
Research Center of Ginseng and Medicinal Materials, 41 Dinh Tien Hoang, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City 700-00, Vietnam
2
Faculty of Chemistry, University of Science, Vietnam National University-HoChiMinh City, 227 Nguyen Van Cu, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City 227-01, Vietnam
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; Tel./Fax: +84-8-3827-4377 (T.C.L).
Received: 6 October 2014; in revised form: 14 November 2014 / Accepted: 17 November 2014 / Published: 19 November 2014

Abstract

:
A series of Lycopodium alkaloids, namely lycosquarosine A (1), acetylaposerratinine (2), huperzine A (3), huperzine B (4), 8α-hydrophlemariurine B (5), and huperzinine (6), has been isolated from Vietnamese Huperzia squarrosa. Among them, lycosquarosine A (1) is the new metabolite of the natural source. Lycosquarosine A completely inhibited AChE activity in a dose dependent manner with an IC50 value of 54.3 μg/mL, while acetylaposerratinine (2) showed stronger inhibitory activity than 1 with an IC50 value of 15.2 µg/mL. This result indicates that these alkaloids may be a potent source of AChE inhibitors.
Keywords:
Huperzia squarrosa; Lycopodiaceae; lycosquarosine A; acetylcholinesterase; Lycopodium alkaloids

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease and the most frequent and predominant cause of dementia among the elderly, provoking progressive cognitive decline, psychobehavioral disturbances, memory loss, presence of senile plaques, neurofibrillary tangles and a decrease in cholinergic transmission [1,2]. Neuropathological evidence has demonstrated that cholinergic functions decline in the basal forebrain and cortex in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type [3]. Accordingly, the enhancement of cholinergic neurotransmission has been considered as one potential therapeutic approach against AD. Although the pathogenesis of AD is complicated and involves numerous pathways, two major hypotheses are currently under consideration regarding the molecular mechanism: the cholinergic hypothesis and the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Thus, the focus herein is upon selective cholinesterase (ChE) inhibitors in order to alleviate cholinergic deficits and improve neurotransmission. Pursuant to this, both could be established as viable therapeutic targets for AD [3,4,5]. One treatment strategy to enhance the cholinergic function is the use of acetylcholinesterase (AChE, EC 3.1.1.7) inhibitors to increase the amount of acetylcholine, which is present in the synapses between cholinergic neurons [6]. AChE inhibitors such as donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine, which are the most extensively studied AChE inhibitors, have been shown to significantly improve cognitive function in AD [7,8].
Club moss (Lycopodiaceae) species are well-known to be a rich source of Lycopodium alkaloids possessing a complex heterocyclic ring system and wide ranging biological properties that have attracted great interest from biogenetic, synthetic, and biological perspectives [9,10,11]. Huperzine A, a famous C16N2-type alkaloid isolated from the Chinese folk medicinal herb Huperzia serrata, has been shown to be a highly potent, specific, and reversible inhibitor of AChE [10,12]. Until now, more than 300 Lycopodium alkaloids were reported [9,10,11]. Most of the Lycopodium alkaloids possessing AChE inhibitory activity such as huperzine A, huperzine B, and N-methylhuperzine B belong to the lycodine class [12,13]. In our continuing efforts to search for structurally interesting and bioactive Lycopodium alkaloids, especially in Lycopodium spp. from Vietnam, a new C16N1-type alkaloid, lycosquarosine A was isolated together with five known Lycopodium alkaloids from the club moss Huperzia squarrosa (Forst.) Trevis. Previously, Lycopodium squarrosum (H. squarrosa) originally from Thailand, was phytochemically investigated and several fawcettimine related alkaloids were described [14]. In this paper, we describe the isolation and structure elucidation of lycosquarosine A (1) and the other Lycopodium alkaloids 26 as well as their anti-cholinesterase activity.

2. Result and Discussion

The MeOH extract of the club moss H. squarrosa was partitioned into n-hexane-, EtOAc-, and n-BuOH-soluble fractions and a H2O layer. Chromatographic purification of the EtOAc-soluble fraction led to the isolation of six compounds 16 (Figure 1).
Lycosquarosine A (1) was obtained as a colourless amorphous solid and its molecular formula was deduced from HR-EI-MS analysis to be C18H25NO4. IR absorptions indicated the presence of a carboxylate functionality (1582 cm−1). Its 13C-NMR and DEPT spectra displayed signals for one methyl at δC 22.9 (C-16), two N-bearing methylenes at δC 50.6 (C-1 and C-9, two peak in overlap), six high-field methylenes at δC 18.4 (C-2), 22.1 (C-3), 37.4 (C-6), 25.1 (C-10), 30.3 (C-11) and 32.7 (C-14), one oxygenated methine at δC 79.6 (C-8), two methines at δC 45.0 (C-7) and 29.6 (C-15), together with four sp2 quaternary carbons at δC 205.7 (C-5), 173.1 (C-13), 169.8 (C-12) and 142.7 (C-4), indicating a phlegmariurine B-type related framework [15]. In addition, the carbon signals of one carbonyl δC169.7 (C-17) and one methyl carbon at δC 20.9 (C-18) were ascribed to an acetoxyl group. The 1H-NMR spectrum of 1 displayed signals for a tertiary methyl of the acetoxyl group at δH 2.19 (3H, s, H-18), a secondary methyl at δH 1.08 (3H, d, J = 6.3 Hz, H-16), and one oxymethine proton at δH 5.06 (1H, brd, J = 5.0 Hz, H-8) (Table 1). By comparison with literature 1H- and 13C-NMR data [15,16], 1 could be assigned a phlegmariurine B carbon skeleton with a rearranged five member ring of a >C12=C4-C5(C=O)-C6-C7 type (Figure 1). The complete NMR assignments and connectivity of 1 were further determined by analysis of the COSY, HMQC and HMBC spectroscopic data. 1H–1H COSY and HSQC analyses indicated the presence of three carbon chains between H-1/H-2/H-3 (a), H-6/H-7/H-8/H-15/H-14 (b), and H-9/H-10/H-11 (c) shown by the bold lines in Figure 2. The long-range 1H–13C coupling (HMBC) observed between oxygenated methine H-8 and carbonyl carbon at δC 169.7 (C-17) confirmed the position of the acetoxyl group to be at C-8 (Figure 2 and Supplementary data). The ROESY correlation between H-16 and H-7 indicated that 1 had an α-oriented methyl group at C-15, which was similar to phlegmariurine type of Lycopodium alkaloids [15]. Furthermore, the β-orientation of the acetoxyl function located at C-8 was deduced from the ROESY experiment, showing ROE correlations between Hα-7/H-16 and H-8. Thus, compound 1 was proved to be an 8β-acetoxyl derivative of phlegmariurine B, and was named lycosquarosine A
Figure 1. Chemical structures of isolated compounds 16.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of isolated compounds 16.
Molecules 19 19172 g001
Table 1. 1H- (500 MHz) and 13C- (125 MHz) NMR data of lycosquarosine A (1).
Table 1. 1H- (500 MHz) and 13C- (125 MHz) NMR data of lycosquarosine A (1).
Position1 a
δH ( J in Hz) bδC
14.06 (1H, dd, 13.6, 3.6), 2.90 (1H, dt, 13.6, 3.0)50.6
22.39 (1H, m), 1.41 (1H, m)18.4
32.53 (1H, m), 2.46 (1H, m)22.1
4 142.7
5 205.7
62.55 (1H, m), 2.03 (1H, brd, 19.0)37.4
73.04 (1H, m)45.0
85.06 (brd, 5.0)79.6
93.96 (1H, td, 15.0, 3.0), 3.23 (1H, brd, 15.0)50.6
102.78 (1H, m), 1.93 (1H, m)25.1
112.98 (1H, m), 2.78 (1H, m)30.3
12 169.8
13 173.1
141.59 (1H, d, 15.5), 3.06 (1H, dd, 8.5, 15.5)32.7
152.56 (1H, m)29.6
161.08 (3H, d, 6.3)22.9
17 169.7
182.19 (3H, s)20.9
a Measured in mixture of MeOD and CDCl3; b Chemical shift may be overlapped signals which were confirmed by DEPT-135, HMQC, and HMBC experiments.
Figure 2. Selected 2D NMR correlations of 1.
Figure 2. Selected 2D NMR correlations of 1.
Molecules 19 19172 g002
Compound 2 showed a pseudo-molecular ion peak at m/z 322 [M+H]+ in the ESI-MS, and the molecular formula, C18H27NO4, was established by HR-ESI-MS m/z 322.2051, [M+H]+. IR absorptions (1585 cm−1) implied the presence of a carboxylate functionality. 1H-, 13C-NMR and DEPT data revealed eighteen carbon signals due to four sp2 quaternary carbons, four sp3 methines, eight sp3 methylenes, and two methyl groups. Among them, two methylenes [(δC 54.9, δH 3.90 and 2.99) and (δC 50.9, δH 3.58 and 3.27), belonging to C-1 and C-9, respectively] were ascribed to those bearing a nitrogen. The 1H-NMR spectrum of 2 displayed signals for a tertiary methyl of the acetoxyl group at δH 2.14 (3H, s, H-18), a secondary methyl at δH 1.02 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, H-16) which are similar with those of positions in 1. Since no IR bands and 13C-NMR signals indicated a double bond in comparison with 1, compound 2 must be pentacyclic, which suggested the possibility that a new ring was formed. Extensive NMR analyses spectra of 2 resembled those of 1 except for the presence of one carbinolamine moiety at δC 94.5 (C-13), a sp2 quaternary carbon at δC 47.5 (C-12) and a sp3 methine at C-4 position (δC 47.6, δH 2.40) instead of three quaternary carbons at the same positions in 1 (Table 1). Combination of HMQC and 1H–1H COSY also indicated the presence of three fragment carbon chains (a) –CH2CH2CH2CH–(C-1–C-4), (b) –CH2CHCHCHCH2– (C-6–C-8–C-15–C-14) and (c) –CH2CH2CH2–(C-9–C-11) (Figure 2). The long-range 1H-13C coupling (HMBC) observed between oxygenated methine H-8 and carbonyl carbon at δC 170.4 (C-17) confirmed the position of the acetoxyl group to be at C-8. The coupling pattern of the oxymethine resonance at δH 5.04 (1H, brs, H-8) and its oxygenated carbon at δC 72.3 (C-8) differed from that in 1 with δH 5.08 (1H, brd, J = 5.0 Hz) and δC 80.8, indicating for the α-orientation of the acetoxyl group which is in accordance with the orientation of phlegmariurine B [14]. Additionally, the relative stereochemistry of 2 was elucidated from NOESY correlations. From that, the α-orientation of the acetoxyl function was confirmed from the enhancement of the signals for H-6β methylene hydrogen and H-15 by H-8 irradiation. Other key NOESY correlations were observed between H-4 and H-7, and H3-16 indicating that they are on the same α-orientation. Thus, the relative stereochemistry of 2 was assigned. This compound named acetylaposerratinine [14].
The other compounds were identified as huperzine A (3), huperzine B (4) [12,13], 8α-hydrophlemariurine B (5) [15], and huperzinine (6) [13] by comparing their physiochemical and spectroscopic data with those reported in the corresponding literature.
AChE inhibitors increase the availability of acetylcholine in central cholinergic synapses and are currently the most promising available drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [17]. Cholinergic interneurons in the striatum are an even richer source of acetylcholinesterase and would also be affected strongly by such enzyme inhibitors [17,18]. The anti-cholinesterase activity of the isolated alkaloids was tested by the Ellman reaction [19]. Because the known compounds 36 were already reported to have cholineseterase inhibitory activity, in this experiment, we tested only compounds 1 and 2 for AChE and BuChE inhibition. The new compound, lycosquarosine A (1) showed potent AChE inhibitory activity with an IC50 value of 54.3 µg/mL. However, acetylaposerratinine (2) showed stronger inhibitory activity than 1, with an IC50 value of 15.2 µg/mL. Both of them exhibited weak inhibitory effects on BuChE, with IC50 values over 100 µg/mL. The results showed that lycosquarosine A (1) and acetylaposerratinine (2) exhibited selective inhibition for AChE compared with BuChE. Berberine, which was used as positive control [20], exhibited AChE and BuChE inhibitory activity with IC50 values of 0.09 and 8.01 µg/mL, respectively.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Procedures

Optical rotations were measured with a DIP 370 digital polarimeter (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). UV spectra were taken in MeOH using an EvolutionTM 300 Thermo Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The NMR spectra were obtained on a Unity Inova 500 MHz spectrometer (Varian, McKinley Scientific Inc., Sparta Township, NJ, USA). Silica gel (63–200 μm particle size, Merck, Seoul, Korea) and RP-18 (75 μm particle size, Merck) were used for column chromatography. TLC was carried out using Merck silica gel 60 F254 and RP-18 F254 plates. HPLC was carried out using a Waters (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) system (515 pump) equipped with a UV detector (486 Tunable Absorbance) and an YMC Pak ODS-A column (20 × 250 mm, 5 μm particle size, YMC Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) and HPLC solvents were purchased from SK Chemicals, Seoul, Korea.

3.2. Plant Material

The H. squarrosa club moss was collected in Lam Dong Province, in the central area of Viet Nam on May 2012, and identified by Professor Luan TC, Department of Oriental Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy. A voucher specimen (TCL 00116) was deposited at the Herbarium of the Research Center of Ginseng and Medicinal Materials, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

The dried sample (2.5 kg) was extracted with MeOH (5 L) by refluxing three times for. The combined extracts were concentrated under reduced pressure to give the crude extract (502 g), which was then suspended in 5% HCl and partitioned with CH2Cl2. The aqueous layer was alkalinized until pH~10 with aqueous ammonia, preparing for submitting to Diaion HP 20 macroporous resin column chromatography (750 × 1000 mm). The separation by resin-based column was executed as following: extract solution (pH 10) was loaded onto the column. After adsorption, the column was washed with deionised water to remove the polar impurities, and then eluted with 100% MeOH to obtain the crude alkaloid extracts. The combined extract was dried by rotator evaporation at 40 °C. This residue was further separated by silica gel column chromatography using a system of CH2Cl2/MeOH (100%→0%) gradient, 80% CH2Cl2/MeOH, saturated with ammonia, to give eight subfractions. After solvent removal sub-fraction 2 (242 mg) gave a single spot. The residue was a colourless amorphous solid (16.3 mg, compound 1). Sub-fraction 3 (870 mg), a single spot after removal of the solvent, was recovered from methanol-acetone to give 2 (26 mg). Sub-fraction 7 (218 mg) was chromatographed by MPLC on an ODS column using MeOH–H2O (5:1) with addition of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) to afford 3 (8.5 mg). From sub-fraction 4 (115 mg), compounds 4 (3.6 mg, tR = 18.6 min) and 5 (3.6 mg, tR = 21.1 min) were purified by semi-preparative HPLC (using a gradient solvent system of MeOH-0.1% TFA (25:75 → 85:15; flow rate 5 mL/min) over 90 min; UV detection at 210 nm; YMC Pak ODS-A column (20 × 250 mm, 5 μm particle size)]. Compound 6 (5.5 mg; tR = 28.6 min) was isolated from fraction 5 (212 mg) by semi-preparative HPLC (using a gradient solvent system of MeOH-0.1% TFA (20:80 → 80:20; flow rate 5 mL/min) over 90 min; UV detection at 210 nm; YMC Pak ODS-A column (20 × 250 mm, 5 μm particle size)].

3.4. Lycosquarosine A (1)

White amophous powder; [α]25 D = −6.54 (c 0.05, CHCl3); UV (CHCl3) λmax (log ε): 255 (3.50) nm; IR νmax (KBr): 3397, 1685, 1630, 1452, 865 cm−1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 320.1868 [M+H]+ (calcd for C18H25NO4, 320.1885); 1H- (CDCl3) and 13C-NMR (CDCl3) data are listed in Table 1.

3.5. In Vitro Cholinesterase Inhibitory Activity Assay

The AChE and BChE inhibitory activities were measured using the spectrophotometric method developed by Ellman et al. with a slight modification. ACh and BCh were used as the substrates to detect the inhibition of AChE and BChE, respectively. The reaction mixture contained sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0, 140 μL); tested sample solution (20 μL); and either AChE or BChE solution (20 μL), which were mixed and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. All tested samples and the positive control (berberine) were dissolved in 10% analytical grade dimethyl sulfoxide. The reactions were started with the addition of DTNB (10 μL) and either ACh or BCh (10 μL), respectively. The hydrolysis of ACh or BCh was monitored by following the formation of the yellow 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoate anion at 412 nm for 15 min, which resulted from the reaction of DTNB with thiocholine, released by the enzymatic hydrolysis of either ACh or BCh, respectively. All reactions were performed in triplicate and recorded in 96-well microplates, using a VERSA max instrument (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Percent inhibition was calculated from the expression (1 − S/E) × 100, where E and S were the respective enzyme activities without and with the tested sample, respectively. The ChE inhibitory activity of each sample was expressed in terms of the IC50 value (μM required to inhibit the hydrolysis of the substrate, ACh or BCh, by 50%), as calculated from the log-dose inhibition curve [19].

4. Conclusions

Six lycopodium alkaloids, including a new natural product, lycosquarosine A, were isolated from the club moss H. squarrosa. This is the first report on the alkaloid constituents of H. squarrosa from Vietnam and the potential cholinesterase inhibitory activity of these compounds might suggest new sources of anti-Alzheimer disease agents.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/19/11/19172/s1.

Supplementary Files

Supplementary File 1

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number 104.99-2011.19.

Author Contributions

N.N.C., T.M.H., T.C.L. carried out conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the manuscript and revising. N.N.T.H. carried out acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Scarpini, E.; Scheltens, P.; Feldman, H. Treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: Current status and new perspectives. Lancet Neurol. 2003, 2, 539–547. [Google Scholar]
  2. Parihar, M.S.; Hemnani, T. Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis and therapeutic interventions. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2004, 1, 456–467. [Google Scholar]
  3. Whitehouse, P.J.; Price, D.L.; Struble, G.R.; Clarke, A.W.; Coyle, J.T.; DeLong, M.R. Alzheimer’s disease and senile dementia: Loss of neurons in the basal forebrain. Science 1982, 15, 1237–1239. [Google Scholar]
  4. Vassar, R. β-secretase (BACE) as a drug target for Alzheimer’s disease. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2002, 54, 1589–1602. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yan, R.; Bienkowski, M.J.; Shuck, M.E.; Miao, H.; Tory, M.C.; Pauley, A.M. Membrane-floated aspartyl protease with Alzheimer’s disease β-secretase activity. Nature 1999, 402, 533–537. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cummings, J.L. Cholinesterase inhibitors: Expanding applications. Lancet 2000, 356, 2024–2025. [Google Scholar]
  7. Relman, A.S. Tacrine as a treatment for Alzheimer’s dementia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991, 324, 349–352. [Google Scholar]
  8. Camps, P.; El-Achab, R.; Morral, J.; Muñoz-Torrero, D.; Badia, A.; Baños, J.E. New tacrine-huperzine A hybrids (huprines): Highly potent tight-binding acetylcholinesterase inhibitors of interest for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4657–4666. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kobayashi, J.; Morita, H. The Alkaloids; Cordell, G.A., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005; Volume 61, pp. 1–57. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ma, X.; Gang, D.R. The Lycopodium alkaloids. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2004, 21, 752–772. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hirasawa, Y.; Kobayashi, J.; Morita, H. The Lycopodium alkaloids. Heterocycles 2009, 77, 679–729. [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu, J.S.; Yu, C.M.; Zhou, Y.Z.; Han, Y.Y.; Qi, B.R.; Zhu, Y.L. Study on the chemistry of huperzine A and B. Acta Chim. Sin. 1986, 44, 1035–1040. [Google Scholar]
  13. Shen, Y.C.; Chen, C.H. Alkaloids from Lycopodium casuarinoides. J. Nat. Prod. 1994, 57, 824–826. [Google Scholar]
  14. Katakawa, K.; Mito, H.; Kogure, N.; Kitajima, M.; Wongseripipatana, S.; Arisawa, M.; Takayama, H. Ten new fawcettimine-related alkaloids from three species of Lycopodium. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 6561–6567. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tan, C.H.; Chen, G.F.; Ma, X.Q.; Jiang, S.H.; Zhu, D.Y. Three new phlegmariurine B type lycopodium alkaloids from Huperzia serrata. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2002, 4, 227–231. [Google Scholar]
  16. Takayama, H.; Katakawa, K.; Kitajima, M.; Yamaguchi, K.; Aimi, N. Seven new Lycopodium alkaloids, lycoposerramines-C, -D, -E, -P, -Q, -S, and -U, from Lycopodium serratum Thunb. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8307–8311. [Google Scholar]
  17. Giacobini, E. The cholinergic system in Alzheimer disease. Prog. Brain Res. 1990, 84, 321–332. [Google Scholar]
  18. Houghton, P.J.; Ren, Y.; Howes, M.J. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from plants and fungi. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 181–199. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ellman, G.L.; Courtney, K.D.; Andres, V., Jr.; Featherstone, R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961, 7, 88–90. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hung, T.M.; Na, M.; Dat, N.T.; Ngoc, T.M.; Youn, U.; Kim, H.J.; Min, B.S.; Lee, J.; Bae, K. Cholinesterase inhibitory and anti-amnesic activity of alkaloids from Corydalis turtschaninovii. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 119, 74–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Molecules EISSN 1420-3049 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top