Next Article in Journal
Servitization and Sustainable Value Creation Strategy for China’s Manufacturing Industry: A Multiple Case Study in the Belt and Road Initiative
Next Article in Special Issue
Increased Carbon Dioxide by Occupants Promotes Growth of Leafy Vegetables Grown in Indoor Cultivation System
Previous Article in Journal
A Deep Learning Method for Monitoring Vehicle Energy Consumption with GPS Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimizing Temperature and Photoperiod in a Home Cultivation System to Program Normal, Delayed, and Hastened Growth and Development Modes for Leafy Oak-Leaf and Romaine Lettuces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Overview of Multiple Applications of Basil Species and Cultivars and the Effects of Production Environmental Parameters on Yields and Secondary Metabolites in Hydroponic Systems

1
Department of Technical and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 1165 København, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(20), 11332; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011332
Submission received: 17 July 2021 / Revised: 29 September 2021 / Accepted: 11 October 2021 / Published: 14 October 2021

Abstract

:
Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.), including other species and cultivars, is an excellent source of nutritional compounds, the accumulation of which can be stimulated by exogenous factors (environmental and nutritional conditions). Although best practices are relatively established for mature basil plants, microgreens production requires further research to optimize quality and quantity. The study objectives are (i) to provide an overview of the many uses of basil, (ii) collate and present common hydroponic systems available in the market, (iii) review effects of key production environment parameters on basil yields in hydroponic systems, and (iv) summarize the effects of the growth environments on yield quantity and quality of basil microgreens. The paper analyzes in detail key production parameters of basil microgreens in hydroponic systems, such as temperature, humidity, pH, electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen, carbon dioxide, nutrient solutions, and the influence of light (quantity, quality, and photoperiods). The collated literature review has shown that basil, grown hydroponically, can tolerate high variations of environmental parameters: pH 5.1–8.5, temperature 15–24 °C, relative humidity 60–70%, electrical conductivity up to 1.2 mS cm−1, depending on the developmental stage, dissolved oxygen at 4 mg L−1 (optimally 6.5 mg L−1), and light intensity between 200 and 400 μmol m−2 s−1. The study has synthesized an overview of different production parameters to provide guidance on the optimization of environmental conditions to ensure the quantity and quality production of basil microgreens. Improving the quality of basil microgreens can ideally spur continued gastronomic interest in microgreens in general, which will encourage more entrepreneurs to grow basil and other microgreens. Hence, the study findings are a great resource to learn about the effects of different environments on basil microgreen production. This information can inform research for successful production of different species and cultivars of basil microgreens, and establishing testing protocols to improve the quantity and quality of the harvest.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

By 2050 it is estimated that the human population of the Earth will be approximately 10 billion people [1]. Meeting the caloric and nutritional needs of this growing population is a large challenge for humanity. The growing population based on urban agglomeration, in combination with limited natural resources and global warming, increases the severity of this challenge by posing a threat to food safety globally [2]. Conventional agriculture is ill-suited to meet this challenge, as it has negative impacts on the environment, inefficient use of a large quantity of water, high concentrations of nutrients and pesticides in water runoff, high greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and increases soil degradation and erosion. Therefore, in order to improve input use efficiencies and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, hydroponic production systems can represent an alternative to the conventional methods of food production [1]. This literature review focused on the hydroponic production of microgreens with a growing period of 7–21 days that uses substrates of organic or inorganic origin (textile, coconut coir, perlite, etc.) instead of soil substrate. This is of contemporary value, as hydroponic standards for mature plants are relatively well established, while for microgreens, optimal conditions for quality and quantity production are still in development. In general, hydroponics production systems can reduce or avoid the use of insecticides, herbicides, or pesticides, which leads to a reduction in GHGs, while water can be reused, with a reduction in water consumption by up to 90% [3] compared to soil-based production in open fields. Furthermore, hydroponic systems have the advantage of controlling environmental parameters to obtain higher yields and uniform outputs while also improving resource use efficiency [4,5,6].
Microgreens, of which basil is one of the most popularly cultivated choices, are mainly produced hydroponically or semi-hydroponically with very short growing cycles (usually 10–20 days after germination) and are considered the functional food of the 21st century [7]. This is because they are young plants consumed at a seedling stage with a high nutrient density, have a short production cycle, and need little space to grow. Microgreens are seedlings of vegetables and herbs consumed with tender cotyledons, and the first pairs of leaves are more or less developed. At harvest, plant height varies from 2.5 to 8 cm depending on the species [8]. Microgreens are functional crops rich in valuable nutritional elements that are beneficial for human health when used as food supplements. Apart from the larger concentration of nutrients per gram in microgreens compared to mature plants, the taste and aroma are much more intense than mature plants, which makes them ideal for gastronomic purposes. Microgreens are also an alternative to sprouts (germinated seeds) due to their higher content of vitamins, carotenoids, and phenols, as well as their reduced content of nitrates [9]. This is in part due to the controlled environment, which can optimize beneficial compound production.
Hydroponically cultivated microgreens are of increasing importance because of their high nutraceutical properties, but data regarding yield, quality, and nutritional quantity, and factors that influence these properties are limited and still in their early stages [10]. Furthermore, operational practices, including nutrient solution compositions, mineral requirements, and light regimes, have not been standardized yet. Therefore, potential low yields are usually indicated as a limiting factor for microgreen production [11,12,13]. Furthermore, no standard guidelines for quality exist [14], although there are consumer standards such as color and taste that are threshold values of quality and consumer acceptance. However, research is being increasingly focused in this area to determine the protocols necessary to maximize the value of microgreen production. This literature review is focused on these recent papers, as they pertain to basil species or cultivars, with the purpose of collating important syntheses of novel research to harmonize the many disparate sources of information.
Hydroponic production of microgreens offers the potential to produce fresh crops with a short production cycle that have a high concentration of nutrients, vitamins, and beneficial secondary metabolites [15]. Hydroponics practices are increasingly popular due to the perceptions concerning conventional agriculture’s impact on the food supply and human health [16]. However, there are a number of challenges faced by the microgreens producers, hindering the development of this sector. Firstly, there are a number of hydroponics systems available in the market, and it can be difficult for a producer to decide on a particular hydroponic system. Secondly, production parameters viz. light intensity, light quality (spectrum combinations) and photoperiod, pH, electrical conductivity, air, and water temperature, nutrient solution, CO2 content, and air circulation have huge effects on the crop yield in terms of quantity and quality, and best practices for a particular production objective (quality and quantity) do not exist. Thirdly, there is wide species-specific and cultivar-specific variation in crop yields and nutritional contents under similar production environments for microgreens. Hence, this study provides insights into these key challenges in hydroponic production, with a focus on basil species and cultivars, by synthesizing a variety of sources of relevant information. The information presented here contributes to a more nuanced comprehension of the challenges of basil microgreen production in a controlled hydroponic system, which leads to the further development of research and industry to fine-tune optimal production of high-quality, nutrient-dense basil microgreens. Therefore, the study objectives were to:
  • Provide an overview of the multiple uses of basil;
  • Collate and present common hydroponic systems available in the market;
  • Review effects of key production environmental parameters on basil yields in quantity and quality in hydroponic systems;
  • Summarize the effects of the growth environments on basil microgreen yield quantity and quality.

2. Materials and Methods

This literature review is a systematic organization of the information on the multiple applications of basil and the contemporary research trends on environmental parameters necessary for their successful growth and quality production. This was done to present a synthesis of key information on the quality and quantity production of microgreens. The literature review was conducted between December 2020 and August 2021, using the databases: Web of Sciences, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. This was done to synthesize data from a diversity of experiments on the successful production of hydroponic basil microgreens by collating the literature on environmental parameterization and production processes. The review of the literature and data collection used a number of keywords relevant for the production of basil microgreens in hydroponic systems, such as: temperature, humidity, pH, electrical conductivity, oxygen dissolved in water, carbon dioxide, nutrient solutions, and the influence of light (quantity, quality, and photoperiods). The data collected were structured to provide a more nuanced comprehension of the challenges of basil microgreen production in controlled hydroponic systems, which can help further the research and development needs on basil production, as well as elaborate on adequate cultivation protocols for controlled environment parameterization.

3. Results

3.1. Multiple Applications of Basil

Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.), Labiatae Fam., including other cultivars and species, has many uses such as seasoning, medicine, ornamental, and industrial applications such as cosmetic production (Table 1). For instance, basil is used both in traditional and scientific medicine due to the presence of health-promoting compounds and essential oils. For instance, basil essential oils have an important role in reducing inflammation, muscle spasms, have antibacterial and antifungal activity, and have a beneficial influence on the respiratory and digestive system [1,15]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has estimated that medicines based on plants, especially extracts of plants, are used by almost 80% of the world population for their first course of treatment [17]. In this regard, Basil is often used in traditional medicine, especially against intestinal worms, flu, or kidney disease, for the carminative effect (that relieves abdominal pain and promotes the evacuation of intestinal gas), and even for the treatment of insect or snake bites [18].
In general, the aboveground plant parts of basil are used to extract the volatile oil and compounds. Studies show that the aboveground plant parts of the basil (Basilici herba) contain around 0.04–0.7% (Aetheroleum basilici) [34], 0.2–0.5% [39], or 0.2–1% volatile oils [40]. The volatile oil content of basil plants can vary between 0.2% and 1%, reaching up to 1.7% based on the origin of the biological material and the phenological stage of plants [41]. According to the composition of its volatile oil, basil can be grouped into four chemotypes [15]: (1) rich in methyl-chavicol, (2) rich in linalool, (3) rich in methyl-eugenol, and (4) rich in methyl-cinnamate [42]. In accordance with the geographical origin of the types of basil, there exists a European chemotype with linalool (35–50%) and estragole (15–25%) as main compounds; a reunion chemotype, with 80% estragole in its volatile oil; a tropical chemotype (cinnamon basil) with a high percentage of methyl-cinnamate; and a eugenol chemotype rich in eugenol [43]. Furthermore, Milică et al. [33] list the following active substances in basil: volatile oil (containing estragole, linalool, ocimene, cineole, camphor, and eugenol as main compounds), flavonoids (apigenin), glycosides (esculin, esculetin), saponins, triterpene saponosides, tannins, phenolic acids (cafeic, ferulic, cinamic, ursolic), vitamins and mineral salts [44]. Kutta [41] lists 140 compounds identified in the volatile oil of basil, of which over 30 are monoterpene, almost 30 are sesquiterpene, with 20 derivates of carboxylic acids, 11 aliphatic aldehydes, 6 aliphatic alcohols, and over 20 aromatic compounds.
Flavonoids and other phenolic compounds are secondary metabolites of plants, and they are known to have beneficial effects on the human body. Currently, more than 8000 phenolic compounds have been identified [45]. Their antioxidant, anticancer, antimicrobial, cardioprotective, and anti-inflammatory effects have been demonstrated in previous research [45]. Phenolics have an antioxidant effect that is more effective even than that of certain vitamins [46]. Different studies have concluded that basil contains significant amounts of phenolic substances with antioxidant effects, for example, chicoric acid [47], rosmarinic acid, and cafeic acid [48]. Their quantity varies according to the basil cultivars, with values between 3.47 and 17.58 mg g−1 dry matter expressed in gallic acid equivalents [49]. It has also been demonstrated that there is even a diurnal variation of secondary metabolites accumulated in the plant [50]. The harvesting time during the day can therefore be quite important in order to obtain the desired secondary metabolites. Besides the above-mentioned aspects, basil also contains carotene, vitamin A, B6, and C, calcium, potassium, phosphorus, magnesium, and iron [51,52]. All of these nutrient incidences add to basil’s potential uses and value and necessitate the effective parameterization of the basil microgreen production environment via hydroponic systems to optimize their beneficial compound content. Furthermore, most of the above-mentioned studies used mature basil as their study units; therefore, the concentrations of these valuable compounds and their production during the microgreens phenological stages is an important avenue of future research. Previous research has already shown that microgreens have higher concentrations of nutrients; it is, therefore, likely that it also produces many other valuable secondary metabolites at a high concentration as well, thereby adding to basil’s value [9].
Besides its uses in medicine, cultivating basil can be done for seasoning or food application purposes. For instance, the aerial parts of the plant have been used for the seasoning of different sauces, foods, pasta, sausage, and pickles. Basil can also be used in the food industry, where it can be added as a preservative and antioxidant to different food products [36]. This is because the Herba variety (Herba Basilici), which contains volatile oil in the range of 0.5–1.5% and is rich in estragole (up to 80%) and in linalool [53], has antimicrobial and antifungal properties. For example, basil essential oil has been used to prepare a new type of packing system to extend the shelf life of food: microcapsules and packing systems that inhibit the bacterial activity and increase the pH of packed food [37].
Beyond medicine and gastronomic purposes, basil extracts can also be used to prepare liqueur [15]. Basil is also cultivated for use in the cosmetic industry to prepare different products such as perfumes, soaps, shampoos, and toothpaste, to name a few [33]. Tacchini et al. [38] also demonstrated the importance of using basil essential oil (EO) in cosmetic formulations and food supplements as antioxidant agents.

3.2. Overview of Hydroponics Systems for Basil Microgreen Production

Hydroponics, or “soilless” plant cultivation, involves growing plants in a nutrient solution consisting of water and nutrients or using an inert and porous substrate (mineral wool, clay, perlite, vermiculite, etc.) that helps retain the nutrient solution and facilitate oxygenation of the roots for plant growth. The common hydroponic systems currently available in the market are provided in Table 2.

3.3. Production Environment in Hydroponics Systems

In a hydroponic system, basil successfully tolerates some variation of environmental parameters. The main environmental conditions that influence the development of microgreens in the hydroponic system are: light (photoperiodicity, light intensity, color spectrum), pH, electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen, air and water temperature, CO2 concentration, and relative humidity. Table 3 provides a synthesis of production environment factors, based on the literature analyzed, for the achievement of successful growth and development of basil microgreens. Following the analysis of the reviewed literature, we have synthesized the following average values for basil’s range of tolerance: pH in a range of 5.1–8.5, temperature 15–24 °C, relative humidity 60–70%, electrical conductivity 1.2 mS cm−1, dissolved oxygen minimum 4 mg L−1, and light intensity around 300 μmol m−2 s−1. The following sections go into further detail on the different environmental parameters to offer a higher resolution analysis of basil production parameters.

3.3.1. Germination

For the initial step of successful germination, basil seeds need temperatures in ranges of 20 °C [54], 23 °C [55], 25 °C [56], or even up to 34.5 °C [57]. In the germination process, seeds follow three distinct phases: water soaking, reinitiating metabolic activities from the seed, appearance of radicle, and subsequent elongation. Factors that influence germination have an important role in all these three phases, and their influence upon each activity helps to determine the germination process. For example, the spectrum of red light favors growth in general, while blue light inhibits growth, but blue light is also a promoter for the germination process [58]. Seed germination is influenced by several other factors as well, such as the water regime, temperature of the media sublayer, light, and hormone balance [59]. For instance, the dipping of seeds into water has shown positive effects on germination [60]. Applying salicylic acid has also been shown to increase the germination capacity of basil seeds under conditions of high salinity [61]. The treatment of seeds with gibberellic, indoleacetic, indolebutyric acid, α-naphthyl-acetic acid in concentrations of 50, 100, and 150 mg L−1 before germination (25 °C) has also been shown to stimulate germination capacity, with the best results in the case of the gibberellic acid in a concentration of 100 mg L−1 [62]. As seen in Table 4, the time from the start of germination to the appearance of the first radicles varied according to the temperature and the treatment the seeds had undergone [15]. In general, Table 4 demonstrates that the time needed for the appearance of the first radicles decreased inversely with the rise in temperature. Table 4 also shows that the treatment of seeds with gibberellic acid before germination resulted in a reduction in time before radicles appeared in the case of all basil types tested.

3.3.2. Light: Light Intensity, Color Spectrum, Photoperiodism, Position

There are a few main methods to meet the light requirements of microgreens: the first is to use natural light, although this limits the degree of control, the time of year they can be grown, and the photoperiod; the second is to use artificial light systems such as high-pressure sodium (HPS), fluorescent, or light-emitting diodes (LED), to name a few. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages. However, because of their many advantages, LED artificial lighting systems have recorded the highest growth in the microgreens market segment; this is due to the long lifetime of bulbs (50,000 h) and that they have a power consumption up to 50% less than fluorescent lamps and up to 80% lower than the incandescent ones while achieving comparable, and even in some cases superior, outputs [1]. However, their initial upfront cost can be prohibitive for consumer use. Another advantage of LEDs is the low amount of heat produced from the lights, which avoids burning the young seedlings and allows variable light distance setups. HPS lights are more common for mature vegetative use, given their high heat load and spectra; they are also more expensive over time given their high electricity cost. Fluorescent lights are cheap, but they lack spectral outputs and intensity. Furthermore, disposing of them can be toxic and costly, given their material composition.
Microgreens are, in general, very sensitive to light, and the most important aspects that influence them are:
  • Light intensity, which is a quantitative measure that refers to the number of photons that reach the leaf level during a unit of time (μmol m−2 s−1). This is the most important parameter for the photosynthetic process. Upon the placement of lamps, one should consider their type and the fact that light intensity is reduced by the square of distance [63]. Different types of lamps also produce variable amounts of heat, which necessitates a certain distance from the young vulnerable microgreens;
  • Spectral distribution of light is the wavelength of light that the plants are exposed to. For photosynthesis, plants respond best to red and blue light spectra (300–450 nm for blue, 620–750 for red). However, new research is pinpointing that photomorphogenesis occurs when plants, including microgreens, are exposed to wavelengths outside the traditional range: for instance, it has been shown that plants respond to UV light, in the range of 260–400, and to far-red light, from 750 to 780; this photomorphogenesis results in higher accumulations of specific phytochemicals and nutrients that improve the flavor and health benefits of microgreens [64,65,66,67,68];
  • Photoperiodism, which refers to the lighting duration, has the most relevance for inciting phenological stages, such as blooming. According to the crop species, the generative phase can be controlled by manipulating photoperiodism [69]. It is, therefore, appropriate to have a long photoperiod for increased photosynthesis as well as ensuring the microgreens do not become cued to a more autumnal day length.
All three light aspects are involved with the production and accumulation of active substances in the basil plant (Table 5). Recent studies on systems of artificial lighting have shown that even the quality of light and light spectrum can influence plants significantly. For instance, the spectrum of blue color (including UV A and B ranges) can stimulate the production of secondary metabolites, while red spectra (including far-red) influences plant growth and the accumulation of saccharides (starch and sugars) [65,66,67,68]. In this vein, Ying et al. [69] suggest that the combination of 15% blue and 85% red LED light can potentially replace cool white fluorescent light as the sole light source for indoor production of microgreens. Furthermore, the use of white light has been shown to result in a short hypocotyl, while red light made stems elongate, and blue light helped with the accumulation of biomass [1]. Samuoliene et al. [70] evaluated the impact of additional red LED lighting, in the short run, on the production of antioxidants in microgreens. At the pre-harvest stage of 3 days, HPS lamps were supplemented by 638 nm LEDs, whereas reference plants continued under lighting conditions identical to those of the growth stage. Photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) generated by lighting was 170 μmol m−2 s−1, and net PPFD generated by lighting in combination with HPS lamps was 300 μmol m−2 s−1 (16-h; 19–22/15–18 °C). Under these conditions (mild photooxidative stress), for basil microgreens, the concentration of phenols grew by 30.7%, the antioxidant compounds increased by 18.3%, the total anthocyanin wasn’t influenced, and the content of ascorbic acid decreased 53.9%. Another study showed that HPS lighting recorded a significantly lower quantity of oxygen in the nutritional solution compared to LED lighting [1]. These studies all demonstrate the tradeoffs associated with different types, qualities, and quantities of light when producing microgreens.
Furthermore, the use of different qualities and quantities of light can also be used to augment other plant production processes. For instance, there are several studies that demonstrated the influence of light on the germination process. It has been shown that light intensity has no influence on the germination of seeds [71], but what does influence germination is the light wavelength [72,73]. This sensitivity to light separates seeds into three categories: seeds that need light in order to germinate, seeds that need darkness in order to germinate, and seeds that are neutral to light [74]. Reaction to light has also been analyzed at a genetic level in order to observe what genes activate in the presence of light and what biochemical processes are at the basis of synchronizing with the best season in which the plant must be active [75]. For instance, there are a series of photoreceptors that determine how plants react to light: phytochromes that regulate seed germination, coordinate the development of hypocotyl and roots, and cryptochromes that inhibit stem elongation, control the initiation of blooming according to photoperiodism, regulate circadian rhythm, phototropism, and stomatal conductance [76]. As plants absorb blue and red light and reflect green light, current technology allows us to use a specific artificial lighting system with targeted wavelength spectra that are beneficial for plant photosynthesis while reducing power consumption. These LEDs can be manipulated so as to apply the recipe of light adequate for the specific crop species.

3.3.3. Air and Water Temperature

Besides the major factors discussed above, there are other environmental factors that have more subtle effects on basil microgreen production that should be considered as well. For instance, the temperature of the nutritional solution is generally a few degrees lower than that of the environment, which influences the content of oxygen in the water, which is essential for root and plant physiological functioning and health [81]. For basil, the nutritional solution must be maintained at a low temperature (under 20 °C) in order to maintain the quantity of oxygen dissolved in water under optimal parameters (6.5 mg L−1) [1]. There are several factors that affect solution temperature. For instance, the water that is returned via recirculating hydroponic systems is usually warmer than the water that is freshly introduced into the system, which creates a challenge for ensuring the best dose of oxygen dissolved in water, according to Waller and Yitayew [82]. The temperature of the nutritional solution must therefore be controlled and corrected while also considering the demands of each crop. This is because the temperature of the solution also influences the assimilation of nutritional elements; for instance, at low temperatures, the assimilation of nitrogen drops (the accumulation of phosphorus and potassium is less affected). Furthermore, artificial light has an indirect effect on the oxygen dissolved in water through the heat emanated by the different lamps that in turn influence the temperature of the nutritional solution in the water. In a hydroponic system, the oxygen dissolved in water is in the optimal range when the temperature of the solution is between 15 and 27 °C [1].
In general, it is also important to consider these optimal thermal ranges for air temperature as well as water, as it impacts other physiological processes; for instance, when the temperature exceeds 30 °C, basil can suffer from thermal stress. This is important to incorporate into production designs, as temperature influences stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, and the growth and development of plants [83]. Furthermore, certain bioactive substances become more concentrated during temperature ranges that are not in the best parameters for cultivating, while others drop under the same conditions. In the opposite direction, thermal stress with temperatures under the normal range (18 °C) can determine a slowdown or even the stagnation of growth, in the case of certain thermophilic plants. In general, basil prefers temperatures between 18 and 27 °C, with a lack of growth and subsequent radicle emergence response in cooler conditions. Basil does not tolerate cool weather during its vegetative growth stage, as the plant development slows down, and it can be damaged at temperatures between 0 and 1 °C [34,39]. These thermal ranges and outcomes can be harnessed to achieve desirable microgreen production during different phenological stages while also maximizing their desirable outputs.

3.3.4. Relative Humidity

Controlling the relative humidity (RH) is important for ensuring optimal functioning of the plant by helping to ensure a correct nutrition uptake and profile, reducing drought stress through excessive transpiration, and controlling pathogenic microorganism activity. Atmospheric humidity is directly related to air temperature, which depends, among other things, on air composition. For instance, at 5 °C, saturated air contains 6.8 g m−3 water that reaches 17.4 g m−3 at 20 °C. In the case of a sudden drop in temperature, air sheds water, and condensation appears, i.e., gas liquefaction with water droplet formation. In general, the ideal value of RH for temperate plants is 50–60%, and for tropical plants, it is 70–90%. For basil, the ideal RH is approximately 60–70% at a constant temperature of 22 °C [1]. Moving beyond this RH range can lead to microbial spoilage of the plants, with a very likely incidence of mold or other pathogens. There are a few key factors that can augment or diminish RH in hydroponic systems; for instance, the type of water delivery system, such as aeroponics, which can acutely increase RH. Another example is via temperature changes from the type of lighting system used, such as HPS lights, which will increase the temperature and therefore lower RH. Proper ventilation can also greatly influence the RH and likelihood of pathogenicity by correcting the amount of humidity in the air. Simple fans in this regard can effectively distribute air and wick moisture directly off the microgreen leaves. Another example of exogenous factors that can influence RH is CO2 concentration, which can augment temperature and lead to the accumulation of humidity and thereby increase the humidity in a room. This is important to consider for systems that have added CO2 to improve plant photosynthetic capacity.

3.3.5. Dissolved Oxygen

Dissolved oxygen in water is an important parameter for the optimal functioning of the nutritional solution in hydroponic systems. It influences the respiration of the radicular system and its capacity to extract micro- and macro-elements [84]. Moreover, a reduction in the quantity of oxygen from the water can lead to a reduced conductivity of the leaf’s stomata [85], which can impact photosynthesis, thus affecting the growth and development of the plant species [86]. Low levels of oxygen in the water can also be detrimental to root growth and incite the colonization of anaerobic microbes. Although oxygen can be enriched by applying peroxide, this can chemically alter the nutritional solution as a consequence. Furthermore, this parameter has some dynamics that are hard to anticipate, as it is influenced by several biotic and abiotic factors [87]. However, it has been noted in the literature that the concentration of oxygen dissolved in water of over 6 mg O2 L−1min−1 prevents the development of diseases in the nutritional solution [88]. Furthermore, oxygen dissolved in water has a deterministic effect on the growth and development of plants, but also in the accumulation of bioactive substances; for basil, it is recommended to be 6.5 mg L−1 [1]. Therefore, controlling the oxygen levels is essential for successfully achieving desired microgreen production outputs without having to undertake remedial solutions for disease burdens or setbacks due to low growth trajectories.

3.3.6. The Nutrient Solution

In hydroponic systems, the nutrient solution must be carefully monitored by checking certain essential parameters such as pH, electrical conductivity, specific nutrient quantities, dissolved oxygen, and temperature, as well as qualitative factors such as algae presence or other microorganism activity. In addition to other parameters, the nutrient solution has a very important role in ensuring successful seed germination [89]. Beyond this, the nutritional solution has an important role in the growth and development of plants, but if done incorrectly, can also lead to chemical stress, which can be diagnosed in a variety of ways [90]. One example of this chemical stress is when nitrogen, in excess, slows down water absorption and causes dysfunctional growth and photosynthesis. This can be identified via the observation of yellowed leaves, for instance.
In the case of hydroponic systems, one must take into consideration the ratio of macro- and microelements from the nutritional solution. An adequate nutrient solution used in hydroponics must contain nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, sulfur, iron, manganese, copper, zinc, molybdenum, boron, and chlorine. These have a direct effect on the primary and secondary metabolism of the plant, which influences the health and downstream quality of products. Gaseous elements, such as oxygen and carbon dioxide, also significantly influence the secondary metabolism of plants. Oxygen and carbon dioxide have an essential role in photosynthesis and transpiration, which influences the accumulation of active substances in plants.
The nutrient solution is the ideal environment to facilitate more effective standardization of food quality and helps assure the safety of the food product that is eventually offered to the consumer [9]. The adequate biofortification of plants with appropriate nutrition can help ensure both health and quality, as well as buffering against decay and microbial spoilage. For example, among the various biofortification techniques, selenium application in the nutrient solution of hydroponic systems has been shown to be effective. This is important because selenium is considered essential for human nutrition as it is involved in the metabolic pathway of selenoproteins and relevant biological functions [9]. By using the technique of liquid absorption, selenium presence in the environment is minimized, and selenium assimilation is maximized by the absence of soil interactions; moreover, the constant root exposure to the nutrient solution affords the application of reduced selenium rates for adequate uptake compared to plants in soil systems. Calcium chloride biofortification has also shown promising results on increasing microgreen nutrient and phytochemical presence, which increases their value for human consumption [13].

3.3.7. pH

In general, basil prefers a pH between 6 and 7. However, the optimal ranges of pH for the production of basil are different compared to conventional systems that are planted in the soil. For hydroponic systems, the pH must be between 5.5 and 7, in which case the radicular system has macro and microelements available in the nutritional solution, which are necessary for plant development. The pH and electrical conductivity are parameters that can be corrected by the nutritional solution [91], as well as through the addition of buffer solutions that can augment or diminish pH. These are widely available and simple to use, ensuring that this parameter is both relatively easy to measure with affordable instruments and also easily corrected via solution buffering.

3.3.8. Electrical Conductivity (EC)

The optimal electrical conductivity range for a nutrient solution depends on the species cultivated and on the developmental stage of the plants. Seedlings must initially be fertilized with a solution with an electrical conductivity of 1.2 mS as a maximum, with its concentration growing progressively with the development of plants. Electrical conductivity has no influence on the pathogens that can develop in the solution, although optimal nutritional fortification is important for plant immune functioning, and chemical corrections can be made to control pests. For example, the use of potassium silicate can control pathogens such as Fusarium spp. [92]. Therefore, controlling electrical conductivity is essential for ensuring an adequate supply of molecular building blocks for growth, and thereby buffering the plant against pests and completing the desired microgreen production in a timely manner.
Table 6 describes nine different examples from the literature on the impact of different treatments of the pH, EC, substrate, and nutrient solution on downstream outcomes of basil microgreen production.

4. Conclusions

The literature review undertaken here has demonstrated that the production of basil microgreens using hydroponic systems must be organized with care for controlling the many environmental and production parameters to achieve desired outputs that are of adequate quality. This is in comparison to more conventional production methods using soil, considering all the controllable factors in hydroponic systems that have been shown to influence the accumulation of bioactive substances, the harvest timeframe, and the quality of the finished product. Furthermore, the lack of a soil’s microbiome in hydroponic systems is also important to consider, as unsuccessful parameterization leaves the plants vulnerable to harmful spoilage by microorganisms. However, the high degree of environmental control necessary for optimal growth can also be beneficial to hydroponic systems, as the sophisticated organization can lead to the elaboration of certain protocols to influence factors that can positively influence plants in order to obtain a crop as uniform as possible throughout the year, with higher concentrations of active substances and nutrients valuable for human health. This is why it is necessary to standardize certain cultivation protocols to ensure their quality; this is also why future research will benefit from syntheses of a wide variety of data on the value and production trends of hydroponically grown basil microgreens. For instance, there is a wide variation of environmental impact factors and their relationship to downstream basil outputs, which means that there is no single prescription that will guarantee perfect results. Despite this, the literature review undertaken here has demonstrated that there are optimal ranges within which one can begin the task of designing effective prescriptions for successful microgreen production.
This paper has shown that the nutritional solution, temperature, and light regime have the most important role in seed germination and development while also summarizing the recent research on the many promising research trends in refining microgreen production to achieve optimal outputs along its phenological stages. The nutritional solution, air, and water temperature, light regime, pH, electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen, CO2 concentration, and relative humidity are all important factors that influence secondary metabolism from an incipient phase, which in the final stages increases both the perceived and actual value of the plants by contributing to human health and nutritional fortification. This literature review has shown that microgreen producers must integrate specific systematic hydroponic strategies to obtain high-quality microgreens and high quantity and quality bioactive substances while also avoiding the potential for spoilage and low-quality production when moving too far beyond the noted parameter ranges summarized here. Many authors in the literature review have noted that best practices have not been developed; this literature review has therefore gathered critical information regarding hydroponically grown basil microgreen production that can be used by researchers and producers to improve the chances of a successful production of yields and valuable secondary metabolites.

Author Contributions

T.R.: conceptualization; writing—original draft preparation; supervision; project administration; funding acquisition. R.J.C.: conceptualization; writing—review and editing; P.I.M.: writing—review and editing; resources; data curation. M.A.M.: investigation; data curation. B.B.G.: conceptualization; review and editing; supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was jointly supported by (i) grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CCCDI-UEFISCDI, project number COFUND-ICT-AGRI-FOOD-GOHYDRO-2, within PNCDI III in Romania and by (ii) Green Development and Demonstration Program, under The Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries of Denmark within the framework of GOHYDRO project (journal number: 34009-20-1815). GOhydro is part of the ERA-NET Cofund ICT-AGRI-FOOD with funding provided by national sources, Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding, and co-funding by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, grant agreement number 862665.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article. Any quoted data can be checked in their respective published reference listed below.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Giurgiu, G.M. Research on Hydroponic Cultivation of Some Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Species and the Influence of the Technology on the Bioactive Substance. Ph.D. Thesis, USAMV Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. De Vries, G. Feeding the world in the 21st century. Trends Plant. Sci. 2000, 5, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khazaie, H.R.; Nadjafi, F.; Bannayan, M. Effect of irrigation frequency and planting density on herbage biomass and oil production of thyme (Thymus vulgaris) and hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis). Ind. Crop. Prod. 2008, 27, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, F.; Tang, Y.N.; Shen, M.Y. Coordination control of greenhouse environ-mental factors. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 2011, 8, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ncube, B.; Finnie, J.F.; Van Staden, J. Quality from the field: The impact of environmental factors as quality determinants in medicinal plants. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2012, 82, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Tawaha, A.A.; Karaki, G.A.; Adnan, M. Antioxidant activity, total phenols and variation of chemical composition from essential oil in sage (Salvia officinalis L.) grown under protected soilless condition and open field conditions. Adv. Environ. Biol. 2013, 7, 894–901. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee, J.S.; Pill, W.G.; Cobb, B.B.; Olszewski, M. Seed treatments to advance greenhouse establishment of beet and chard microgreens. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2004, 79, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xiao, Z.; Lester, G.E.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Q. Assessment of vitamin and carotenoid concentrations of emerging food products: Edible microgreens. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 7644–7651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pannico, A.; El-Nakhel, C.; Graziani, G.; Kyriacou, M.C.; Giordano, M.; Soteriou, G.A.; Zarrelli, A.; Ritieni, A.; De Pascale, S.; Rouphael, Y. Selenium biofortification impacts the nutritive value, polyphenolic content, and bioactive constitution of variable microgreens genotypes. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Bulgari, R.; Baldi, A.; Ferrante, A.; Lenzi, A. Yield and quality of basil, Swiss chard, and rocket microgreens grown in a hydroponic system, New Zealand. J. Crop. Hortic. Sci. 2017, 45, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Murphy, C.J.; Llort, K.F.; Pill, W.G. Factors affecting the growth of microgreen table beet. Int. J. Veg. Sci. 2010, 16, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kou, L.P.; Yang, T.B.; Luo, Y.G.; Liu, X.J.; Huang, L.H.; Codling, E. Pre-harvest calcium application increases biomass and delays senescence of broccoli microgreens. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 87, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, J.; Kou, L.; Geng, P.; Huang, H.; Yang, T.; Luo, Y.; Chen, P. Metabolomic assessment reveals an elevated level of glucosinolate content in CaCl2 treated broccoli microgreens. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 1863–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Murphy, C.J.; Pill, W.G. Cultural practices to speed the growth of microgreen arugula (roquette; Eruca vesicaria subsp. sativa). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Biró-Janka, B. Studies Regarding the Biology and Cultivation Technology of Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) in the Eastern Part of the Transylvanian Plain. Ph.D. Thesis, USAMV Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. Al Murad, M.; Razi, K.; Jeong, B.R.; Samy, P.M.A.; Muneer, S. Light emitting diodes (LEDs) as agricultural lighting: Impact and its potential on improving physiology, flowering, and secondary metabolites of crops. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. El-Tantawy, W.H.; Temraz, A. Natural products for controlling hyperlipidemia: Review. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 125, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Khan, I.A.; Abourashed, E.A. Leung’s Encyclopedia of Common Natural Ingredients: Used in Food, Drugs, and Cosmetics, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 74–75. [Google Scholar]
  19. Grayer, R.J.; Kite, G.C.; Goldstone, F.J.; Bryan, S.E.; Paton, A.; Putievsky, E. Infraspecific taxonomy and essential oil chemotypes in sweet basil, Ocimum basilicum. Phytochemistry 1996, 43, 1033–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Carović-Stanko, K.; Orlić, S.; Politeo, O.; Strikić, F.; Kolak, I.; Milos, M.; Satovic, Z. Composition and antibacterial activities of essential oils of seven Ocimum taxa. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Taie, H.A.A.; Abd-El, Z.; Salama, R.; Radwan, S. Potenial activity of basyl plants as a source of antioxidants and anticancer agents as affected by organic and bio-organic fertilization. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2010, 38, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Oxenham, S.K.; Svoboda, K.P.; Walters, D.R. Antifungal activity of the essential oil of basil (Ocimum basilicum). J. Phytopathol. 2005, 153, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, S.J.; Umano, K.; Shibamoto, T.; Lee, K.G. Identification of volatile components in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) and thyme leaves (Thymus vulgaris L.) and their antioxidant properties. Food Chem. 2005, 91, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Politeo, O.; Jukic, M.; Milos, M. Chemical composition and antioxidant capacity of free volatile aglycones from basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) compared with its essential oil. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Erler, F.; Ulug, I.; Yalcinkaya, B. Repellent activity of five essential oils against culex pipiens. Fitoterapia 2006, 77, 491–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chiriac, I.P.; Ulea, E. Study Regarding effectiveness of some plant extracts and different pesticides against an Erwinia amylovora (Burrill.) Winslow et al. strain isolated from quince. Cercet. Agron. Mold. 2012, 45, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gonceariuc, M. Plante Medicinale și Aromatice Cultivate, 1st ed.; Academia de Științe a Moldovei: Chișinău, Moldova, 2008; pp. 18–25. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang, J.W.; Li, S.K.; Wu, W.J. The main chemical composition and in vitro antifungal activity of the essential oils of Ocimum basilicum Linn. var. Pilosum (Willd.) Benth. Molecules 2009, 14, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Chang, C.L.; Cho, I.K.; Li, Q.X. Insecticidal activity of basil oil, trans-anethole, estragole, and linalool to adult fruit flies Ceratitis capitata, Bactrocera dorsalis, and Bactrocera cucurbitae. J. Econ. Entomol. 2009, 102, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ciocan, V. Plante Etnobotanice din România: Între Adevăr şi Pericol; Editura Ceres: Bucureşti, Romania, 2011; pp. 129–134. [Google Scholar]
  31. Oshaghi, E.; Tavilani, H.; Khodadadi, I.; Goodarzi, M. Dill tablet: A potential anti-oxidant and anti-diabetic medicine. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2015, 5, 720–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zahra, A.A.; Al Fadhil, A.O. Antibacterial activity of Ocimum basilicum (Rehan) leaf extract against bacterial pathogens in Sudan. Am. J. Res. Commun. 2015, 3, 94–99. [Google Scholar]
  33. Milică, C.I.; Roman, C.N.; Troia, D. Flora Medicinală a României; Editura Doxologia: Iaşi, Romania, 2012; p. 57. [Google Scholar]
  34. Muntean, L.S.; Tămaş, M.; Muntean, S. Tratat de Plante Medicinale Cultivate şi Spontane, 2nd ed.; Edit. Risoprint: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2016; pp. 485–495. [Google Scholar]
  35. Araújo, S.V.; Sousa, J.P.D.; Pessôa, H.D.L.F.; Freitas, A.F.R.D.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; Alves, L.B.N.; Lima, E.O. Ocimum basilicum: Antibacterial activity and association study with antibiotics against bacteria of clinical importance. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 863–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Takwa, S.; Caleja, C.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Soković, M.; Achour, L.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Arbutus unedo L. and Ocimum basilicum L. as sources of natural preservatives for food industry: A case study using loaf bread. LWT 2018, 88, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Amor, G.; Sabbah, M.; Caputo, L.; Idbella, M.; De Feo, V.; Porta, R.; Fechtali, T.; Mauriello, G. Basil essential oil: Composition, antimicrobial properties, and microencapsulation to produce active chitosan films for food packaging. Foods 2021, 10, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tacchini, M.; Guevara, M.P.E.; Grandini, A.; Maresca, I.; Radice, M.; Angiolella, L.; Guerrini, A. Ocimum campechianum Mill. from Amazonian Ecuador: Chemical composition and biological activities of extracts and their main constituents (eugenol and rosmarinic acid). Molecules 2021, 26, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bernáth, J.; Székely, J. Gyógy—És Aromanövények; Editura Mezőgazda: Budapesta, Hungary, 2006; pp. 367–370. [Google Scholar]
  40. Purkayastha, J.; Nath, S.C. Composition of the camphor-rich essential oil of Ocimum basilicum L. native to Northeast India. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2006, 18, 332–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kutta, G. A Lamiaceae Családra Jellemző Illó És Nem Illó Terpén, Illetve Fenolos Komponensek Kivonása Szuperkritikus Fluid Extrakcióval; Universitatea Corvinus din Budapesta: Budapesta, Hungary, 2010; pp. 17–19. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lawrence, B.M. A further examination of the variation of Ocimum basilicum L. Dev. Food Sci. 1988, 18, 161–170. [Google Scholar]
  43. Koutsos, T.V.; Chatzopoulou, P.S.; Katsiotis, S.T. Effects of individual selection on agronomical and morphological traits and essential oil of a “Greek Basil” population. Euphytica 2009, 170, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sestili, P.; Ismail, T.; Calcabrini, C.; Guescini, M.; Catanzaro, E.; Turrini, E.; Layla, A.; Akhtar, S.; Fimognari, C. The potential effects of Ocimum basilicum on health: A review of pharmacological and toxicological studies. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2018, 14, 679–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tungmunnithum, D.; Thongboonyou, A.; Pholboon, A.; Yangsabai, A. Flavonoids and other phenolic compounds from medicinal plants for pharmaceutical and medical aspects: An overview. Medicines 2018, 5, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kumar, N.; Goel, N. Phenolic acids: Natural versatile molecules with promising therapeutic applications. Biotechnol. Rep. 2019, 24, e00370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lee, J.; Scagel, C.F. Chicoric acid found in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) Leaves. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Surveswaran, S.; Cai, Y.; Corke, H.; Sun, M. Systematic evaluation of natural phenolic antioxidants from 133 indian medicinal plants. Food Chem. 2007, 102, 938–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kwee, E.M.; Niemeyer, E.D. Variations in phenolic composition and antioxidant properties among 15 basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) cultivars. Food Chem. 2011, 128, 1044–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Asghari, G.; Gholamali, H.; Mahmoudi, Z.; Asghari, M. Diurnal variation of essential oil components of Pycnocycla spinosa Decne. ex Boiss. Junidishapur J. Nat. Pharm. Maceutical Prod. 2014, 9, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Dzida, K. Nutrients contents in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) Herb depending on calcium carbonate dose and cultivar. Acta scientiarum Polonorum. Hortorum Cultus 2010, 9, 143–151. [Google Scholar]
  52. Snežana, F. Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) a source of valuable phytonutrients. Int. J. Clin. Nutr. Diet. 2017, 3, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Bîlteanu, G. Fitotehnie, 2nd ed.; Editura Ceres: București, Romania, 2001; p. 544. [Google Scholar]
  54. Fallahi, H.R.; Mohammadi, M.; Aghhavani-Shajari, M.; Ranjbar, F. Determination of germination cardinal temperatures in two basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) cultivars using non-linear regression models. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2015, 2, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nadjafi, E.; Tabrizi, L.; Shabahang, J.; Mahdavi-Damghani, A.M. Cardinal germination temperatures of some medicinal plant species. Seed Technol. 2009, 31, 156–163. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kumar, B. Prediction of germination potential in seeds of Indian basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J. Crop. Improv. 2012, 26, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhou, D.; Jacob, B.; Ponder, M.A.; Welbaum, G.E. Germination response of six sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum) cultivars to temperature. Seed Technol. J. 2016, 37, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  58. Lariguet, P.; Ranocha, P.; De Meyer, M.; Barbier, O.; Penel, C.; Dunand, C. Identification of a hydrogen peroxide signaling pathway in the control of light-dependent germination in Arabidopsis. Planta 2013, 238, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rakshit, A.; Singh, H.B. Advances in Seed Priming; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 147–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Noorhosseini, S.A.; Jokar, N.K.; Damalas, C.A. Improving seed germination and early growth of garden cress (Lepidium sativum) and basil (Ocimum basilicum) with hydro-priming. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 37, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Delavari, P.; Baghizadeh, A.; Enteshari, S.; Kalantari, K.; Yazdanpanah, A.; Mousavi, E.A. The effects of salicylic acid on some of biochemical and morphological characteristic of Ocimum basilicucm under salinity stress. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2010, 4, 4832–4845. [Google Scholar]
  62. Elhindi, K.M.; Dewir, Y.H.; Asrar, A.W.; Abdel-Salam, E.; Sharaf El-Din, A.; Ali, M. Improvement of seed germination in three medicinal plant species by plant growth regulators. HortScience 2016, 51, 887–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Rusu, T. Agrotehnica, 1st ed.; Editura Risoprint: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2005; p. 68. [Google Scholar]
  64. Sabzalian, M.R.; Heydarizadeh, P.; Zahedi, M.; Boroomand, A.; Agharockh, M.; Sahba, M.R.; Schoefs, B. High performance of vegetables, flowers, and medicinal plants in a red-blue LED incubator for indoor plant production. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2014, 34, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Kopsell, D.A.; Morrow, R.C.; Sams, C.R. Blue wavelengths from LED lighting increase nutritionally important metabolites in specialty crops. HortScience 2015, 50, 1285–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Ouzounis, T.; Heuvelink, E.; Ji, Y.; Schouten, H.J.; Visser, R.G.F.; Marcelis, L.F.M. Blue and red LED lighting effects on plant biomass, stomatal conductance, and metabolite content in nine tomato genotypes. Acta Hortic. 2016, 1134, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lobiuc, A.; Vasilache, V.; Oroian, M.; Stoleru, T.; Burducea, M.; Pintilie, O.; Zamfirache, M.M. Blue and red LED illumination improves growth and bioactive compounds contents in acyanic and cyanic Ocimum basilicum L. microgreens. Molecules 2017, 22, 2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Ying, Q.L.; Kong, Y.; Zheng, Y.B. Growth and appearance quality of four microgreen species under light-emitting diode lights with different spectral combinations. Hortscience 2020, 55, 1399–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Singh, D.; Basu, C.; Meinhardt-Wollweber, M.; Roth, B. LEDs for energy efficient greenhouse lighting. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 49, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Samuolienė, G.; Brazaitytė, A.; Sirtautas, R.; Sakalauskienė, S.; Jankauskiene, J.; Duchovskis, P.; Novickovas, A. The impact of supplementary short-term red LED lighting on the antioxidant properties of microgreens. Acta Hortic. 2012, 956, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Leroy, C.; Petitclerc, F.; Orivel, J.; Corbara, B.; Carrias, J.F.; Dejean, A.; Céréghino, R. The influence of light, substrate and seed origin on the germination and establishment of ant-garden bromeliad. Plant Biol. 2017, 19, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Jacobsen, J.V.; Barrero, J.M.; Hughes, T.; Julkowska, M.; Taylor, J.M.; Xu, Q.; Gubler, F. Roles for blue light, jasmonate and nitric oxide in the regulation of dormancy and germination in wheat grain (Triticum aestivum L.). Planta 2013, 238, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, Y.; Folta, K.M. Contributions of green light to the plant growth and development. Am. J. Bot. 2013, 100, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Flores, A.M.; Schutte, B.J.; Shukla, M.K.; Picchioni, G.A.; Ulery, A.L. Time-integrated measurements of seeds germination for salt tolerant plant species. Seed Sci. Technol. 2015, 43, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Footitt, S.; Huang, Z.; Clay, H.A.; Mead, A.; Finch-Savage, W.E. Temperature, light and nitrate sensing coordinate Arabidopsis seed dormancy cycling, resulting in winter and summer annual phenotypes. Plant. J. 2013, 74, 1003–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Renade, S.S.; Gil, M.R.G. Application of monochromatic blue light during germination and hypocotyl development improves outplanted Scot spine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees performance. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 361, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rahman, M.M.; Vasiliev, M.; Alameh, K. LED illumination spectrum manipulation for increasing the yield of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Plants 2021, 10, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Samuolienė, G.; Brazaitytė, A.; Viršilė, A.; Jankauskienė, J.; Sakalauskienė, S.; Duchovskis, P. Red light-dose or wavelength-dependent photoresponse of antioxidants in herb microgreens. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Brazaitytë, A.; Virsilë, A.; Samuolienë, G.; Jankauskienë, J.; Sakalauskienë, S.; Sirtautas, R.; Novièkovas, A.; Dabašinskas, L.; Vaštakaitë, V.; Miliauskienë, J.; et al. Light quality: Growth and nutritional value of microgreens under indoor and greenhouse conditions. Acta Hortic. 2016, 1134, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Vaštakaitė, V.; Viršilė, A.; Brazaitytė, A.; Samuolienė, G.; Jankauskienė, J.; Sirtautas, R.; Duchovskis, P. The effect of UV-a supplemental lighting on antioxidant properties of Ocimum basilicum L. microgreens in greenhouse. In Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific Conference Rural Development, Lithuania, 19–20 November 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Sakamoto, M.; Uenishi, M.; Miyamoto, K.; Suzuki, T. Effect of root-zone temperature of the growth and fruit quality of hydroponically grown strawberry plants. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 8, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Waller, P.; Yitayew, M. Hydroponic irrigation systems. Environ. Sci. 2016, 369–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Bita, C.E.; Gerats, T. Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: Scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Front. Plant. Sci. 2013, 4, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Chun, C.; Takakura, T. Rate of root respiration of lettuce under various dissolved oxygen concentrations in hydroponics. Environ. Control. Biol. 1993, 32, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cornejo, H.A.C.; Rodriguez, L.M.; Vergara, A.G.; Bucio, J.L. Trichoderma modulates stomatal aperture and leaf transpiration through an abscisic acid-dependent mechanism in arabidopsis. J. Plant. Growth Regul. 2015, 34, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Roosta, H.R.; Bagheri, M.H.; Hamidpour, M.; Roozban, M.R. Interactive effects of nitrogen form and oxygen concentration on growth and nutritional status of eggplant in hydroponics. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2016, 18, 731–739. [Google Scholar]
  87. Sakamoto, M.; Suzuki, T. Elevated root-zone temperature modulates growth and quality of hydroponically grown carrots. Agric. Sci. 2015, 6, 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Msayleb, N. Soil Ozonation as a Sustainable Alternative to Methyl Bromide Fumigation and Synthetic Pesticides. Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Oliveira, L.L.; Macedo, A.F. The effect of light quality, temperature and substrate on seed germination and epicotyl development of Carapa guianensis, a multi-use neotropical tree. J. Med. Plants Res. 2015, 9, 582–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Baenas, N.; Garcia-Viguera, C.; Moreno, D.A. Elicitation: A tool for enriching the bioactive composition of foods. Molecules 2014, 19, 13541–13563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Wang, L.C.; Xue, X.Z.; Li, Y.K.; Li, F.; Zhang, F.; Guo, W.Z. Effect of pH upper control limit on nutrient solution component and water spinach growth under hydroponics. Adv. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 9, 717–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chitarra, W.; Pugliese, M.; Gilardi, G.; Gullino, M.L.; Garibaldi, A. Effect of silicates and electrical conductivity on Fusarium wilt of hydroponically grown lettuce. Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2013, 78, 555–557. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Bulgari, R.; Negri, M.; Santoro, P.; Ferrante, A. Quality evaluation of indoor-grown microgreens cultivated on three different substrates. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Manawasinghe, N.K.G.K.R.; Weerasekara, S.H.; Karunaratne, C.S.L.M.; Weerakkody, W.A.P.; Kulapala, B. Influence of substrate and supplementary LED lighting on vertical farming of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) and pak choi (Brassica rapa var. chinensis). Asian J. Agric. Hortic. Res. 2021, 7, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Puccinelli, M.; Malorgio, F.; Rosellini, I.; Pezzarossa, B. Production of selenium-biofortified microgreens from selenium-enriched seeds of basil. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 5601–5605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Scagel, F.C.; Lee, J.; Mitchell, J.N. Salinity from NaCl changes the nutrient and polyphenolic composition of basil leaves. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 127, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Saha, S.; Monroe, A.; Day, M.R. Growth, yield, plant quality and nutrition of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) under soilless agricultural systems. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2016, 61, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Walters, K.J.; Currey, C.J. Hydroponic greenhouse basil production: Comparing systems and cultivars. HortTechnology 2015, 25, 645–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Kiferle, C.; Maggini, R.; Pardossi, A. Influence of nitrogen nutrition on growth and accumulation of rosmarinic acid in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) grown in hydroponic culture. Aust. J. Crop. Sci. 2013, 7, 321–327. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Multiple uses of basil products.
Table 1. Multiple uses of basil products.
No.ReferencesUse and Advantages of Basil
1[19,20,21]Used in traditional medicinal tea for the treatment of bronchial asthma, pertussis, etc., and
pharmaceutical products are used for the treatment of inflammation of the airways, as a tonic
of the nervous system, or as an antispasmodic remedy
2[22]Substances extracted have a fungicidal effect, and grain plants treated with it remained
healthy
3[23,24]Has antibacterial, antioxidant, and antitumor effects
4[25,26]Volatile oil can also be used as a repellent against Culex pipiens, a mosquito that spreads
diseases such as meningitis, or against fire blight (Erwinia amylovora)
5[27]Fresh juice can be used in otitis (inflammation or infection of the ear)
6[28]Volatile oil has been shown to prevent the development of Fulvia fulva, Glomerella
cingulata, Alternaria alternate, and Fusarium solani var. coeruleum phytopathogens in lab
conditions
7[29]Volatile oil and extracted estragole, linalool, methyl-eugenol, and trans-anethole compounds
have shown insecticidal effects on Ceratitis capitata, Bactrocera dorsalis, and Bactrocera
cucurbitae fruit flies
8[18]Often been used in traditional medicine, especially against intestinal worms, flu, or kidney
disease, for the carminative effect (that relieves abdominal pain and promotes the evacuation
of intestinal gas) and even for the treatment of insect or snake bites
9[30]Has shown positive impacts on diseases such as: depression, neurosis, dysfunctions of the
sweat, adrenal, mammary, and sexual glands, diseases of the respiratory system (asthma,
bronchitis, cold and flu, allergy), nausea, liver and gallbladder disease, kidney disease,
rheumatisme, parasitic disease, insect bites and different types of skin cancer
10[31]Has been widely cultivated globally and used to reduce the serum lipid content
11[32]Extraction of ethyl alcohol has shown an antibacterial effect in the case of Escherichia coli,
Pseudomonas auruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus,
and Enterococcus faecalis pathogens, in certain concentrations equaling the effectiveness of
synthetic antibacterial substances
12[33,34]Known to have stimulant-digestive, bactericidal, antifungal, spasmolytic, carminative,
galactogoge, expectorant, antipyretic, febrifuge, diuretic, sedative, and anti-inflammatory
properties. Cultivated for use in the perfume industry to prepare different cosmetic products
such as perfumes, soaps, shampoos, and toothpaste, for example
13[1]Volatile oils (methylchavicol, linalool) reduced the development of the Botrytis fabae
phytopathogen in grain (Vicia faba) in vitro conditions
14[35]Volatile oils have proven effective against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa pathogens, acting even synergistically with certain antibacterial substances
15[36]Can be used in the food industry as a preservative and antioxidant for different food
products
16[17]The World Health Organization (WHO) has estimated that medicines based on plants,
especially extracts of plants, are used by almost 80% of the world population for their first
treatment
17[15]Can be used for the treatment of a wide range of diseases and ailments: diarrhea, dysentery,
nausea, vomiting, gastric ulcer, biliary colics, bloating, flatulence, aerophagia, fermentation
colitis, abdominal cramps, anorexia, migraines, neuroses, depression, insomnia, headaches,
gonorrhea, acne, thrush, stomatitis, etc.
18[37]Essential oils have been used in a new type of packing system to extend the validity period of
food: microcapsules and packing systems that inhibit the bacterial activity and increase the
pH of packed food
19[38]Essential oils have shown effectiveness when used in cosmetic formulations and food
supplements as antioxidant agents
Table 2. Overview of hydroponic systems available on the market.
Table 2. Overview of hydroponic systems available on the market.
No.SystemsCharacteristicsWebsite
1Wick SystemThe plants are placed in a container on an absorbent growth
medium, and the connection to the tank with nutrient
solution is made with absorbant wicks, through which the
nutrient solution diffuses to the level of the plant roots.
www.hydroponics.eu
(accessed on 1 July 2021)
2Drip SystemThe plants are installed in a medium, and the nutrient
solution is transported from the solution tank through drip
tubes; the excess solution reaches the tank again and
recirculates through the system.
www.trees.com
(accessed on 1 July 2021)
3Ebb and Flow
System
It works by flooding and then draining the growing
environment in which the roots of plants with nutrient
solution are located. A pump pushes the nutrient solution
out of the tank, and then the excess drains back slowly,
allowing the plants to receive nutrients regularly.
www.nosoilsolutions.com
(accessed on 1 July 2021)
4Deep Water
Culture (DWC)
System
The plants have their roots immersed directly in the nutrient
solution and float above it. As support, one can use
expanded polystyrene plates with perforations in which the
plants are inserted. Oxygenation of the solution is necessary.
www.epicgardening.com
(accessed on 1 July 2021)
5Nutrient Film
Technology
(NFT)
This system ensures a constant flow of nutrient solution
directly to the plant roots. The plants are grown in
perforated polyethylene tubes and PVC pipes.
www.thespruce.com
(accessed on 1 July 2021)
6Aeroponic
System
This system suspends the plants on top of a water pump that
directly sprays the roots with nutrient solution every few
minutes. The advantages of this system are the use of a much
smaller amount of water, the roots receive oxygen in large
quantities, and the plants grow faster. However, the roots of
the plants being suspended in the air are more prone to
drying faster than in any other hydroponic system.
https://aeroponicsdiy.com
(accessed on 1 July 2021)
7Aquaponic
Systems
Aquaponics integrates aquaculture and hydroponics into a
single culture system. The water used in these crops
normally comes from the fish farming system. The fish
secrete nitrogen compounds that are captured and used by
plants in their growth, prolonging water use and reducing
the adjustment of the nutrient solution for plants.
www.futurefarming.group
(accessed on 1 July 2021)
Table 3. Environmental needs of basil microgreens grown in a hydroponic system synthesized from the literature review.
Table 3. Environmental needs of basil microgreens grown in a hydroponic system synthesized from the literature review.
No.ParameterUnit of MeasurementAverage Value of Parameters
(Parameter Variation)
1LightW400
1.1Photoperiodicityh06:30–21:30 (15 h) (10–20 h)
1.2Light intensityμmol m−2 s−1300 (200–400)
1.3Color spectrumnm440–460 (260–780)
1.4Positioncm150—Lamps HPS (high-pressure sodium)
40—Lamps LED
2Ambient temperature°C21 ± 2 day; 17 night
3Humidity%65 ± 5 (50–60)
4NutrientN-P-K: 3-2-3 (%)Changed every 10 days
5pHpH units6.8 ± 0.4
6Electrical conductivitymS1.2 ± 0.2
7Dissolved oxygenmg L−16.5
8Solution temperature°C20 ± 2
Table 4. Days elapsed until the emergence of the first radicles under different temperature and growth hormone treatment [15].
Table 4. Days elapsed until the emergence of the first radicles under different temperature and growth hormone treatment [15].
Basil CultivarGerminated Seeds at Different Temperatures (%)
10 °C15 °C20 °C
ControlGibberellic AcidAscorbic AcidControlGibberellic AcidAscorbic AcidControlGibberellic AcidAscorbic Acid
Aromat de Buzău---867.75333.5
Serafim-14-4.53.7552.7522
Busuioc Dulce---5.535.25322
Italiano Classico---4.535321.75
Dark Opal-11-4.53.542.7521.5
Genovese-14-3.2535222
Grand Verte-13-3.53.254322
Table 5. Studies on light spectrum, intensity, and photoperiod combinations on basil growth and yields.
Table 5. Studies on light spectrum, intensity, and photoperiod combinations on basil growth and yields.
No.CropTreatmentsEffectsReference
1Basil,
Ocimum
basilicum L.,
sweet basil
Three treatments: only white
LED (W); combination of blue
and red LED (BR) (84% R, 16%
B); combination of red (R), blue
(B) and far-red (F) LED (BRF)
(79% R, 11% B, and 10% F);
PPFD was set at 155 µmol m−2
s−1; photoperiod: 20 h
Combination of blue (B), red (R), and far-red (F) LED
illumination led to a one-fold increase in the yield in
comparison with only white LED illumination (W);
on the other hand, the use of blue (B) and red (R)
LED illumination resulted in a half-fold increase in
plant yield; the results of this study demonstrated the
commercial viability of both BRF-, and BR-
illuminated grow tents compared to the commonly
used W-illuminated counterparts
[77]
2Basil,
Ocimum
basilicum L.,
Sweet
Genovese,
and Red
Rubin
Different ratios of LED blue
and red illumination; 4 light
treatments were 100% white
(White) and various red (R) to
blue (B) ratios, as follows:
2R:1B, 1R:1B, and 1R:2B,
intensities
Growth was enhanced with predominantly blue
illumination, leading to larger cotyledon area and
higher fresh mass. The same treatment elevated
chlorophyll a and anthocyanin pigments contents.
Stimulation of phenolic synthesis and free radical
scavenging activity was improved by predominantly
red light in the green cultivar and by predominantly
blue light in the red cultivar
[68]
3Basil,
Ocimum
basilicum L.,
Sweet
Genovese
LED’s blue 447 nm, red 638–
665 nm, and far-red 731 nm
from increased or
supplemental red light. PPFD
was set to 231 during growth, up to
300 μmol m−2 s−1 during
3-day treatment changing R638
or R665 PPFD level; 16 h
photoperiod
The treatments significantly increased contents of
phenolics, beta-tocopherol, ascorbic acid, and DPPH
(1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) center dot, an
indicator of antioxidant capacity, but suppressed
accumulation of lutein and beta-carotene; under
supplemental or increased red 638 nm light, amounts
of tested antioxidants were greater
[78]
4Basil,
Ocimum
basilicum L.,
Sweet
Genovese
Supplemental 520 and 622 nm
lighting; supplemental 366-
and 390 nm UV-A radiation;
lighting with high PPFD level
of red (638 nm) LEDs; 16 h
photoperiod
Supplemental 520 and 622 nm lighting was more
efficient for nitrate reduction, while the antioxidative
system indices were enhanced by 595 nm diodes;
supplemental 366 and 390 nm UV-A radiation were
more favorable for antioxidant accumulation; short-
term (3-days before harvesting) lighting with high
PPFD level of red (638 nm) LEDs increased the
amounts of the secondary metabolites of microgreens
[79]
5Purple-leaf,
Dark opal,
and green-
leaf Sweet
Genovese
forms of
Ocimum
basilicum L.
The main lighting system (HPS
lamps and natural daylight)
was supplemented with ~13.0
μmol m−2 s−1 flux of UV-A 390
nm blue light, and total PPFD
was ~125 μmol m−2 s−1 (16 h
photoperiod) for 1 or 7 days
before harvest, or entire
growth period, 14 days
UV-A enhanced antioxidant properties in green-leaf.
Generally, UV-A irradiation for 7 days significantly
inhibited growth and hypocotyl elongation of green-
leaf, and for 14 days of both varieties. The total
phenols and anthocyanin contents significantly
decreased after 1 day UV-A irradiation in purple-leaf
basils, with continuous decrease following UV-A
irradiation for 7 or 14 days being shown. No
significant differences in leaf chlorophyll index were
determined
[80]
Table 6. Studies on effects of nutrient solution, pH, EC, and substrate on basil growth and production.
Table 6. Studies on effects of nutrient solution, pH, EC, and substrate on basil growth and production.
No.ReferenceInvestigation ContextTreatmentResults (Yield, Quality, and Quantity, Chlorophyll, etc.)
1[93]Influence of three growing
media (vermiculite, coconut
fiber, and jute fabric) on yield
and quality parameters of two
varieties (green and red)
Microgreens were grown
in a floating micro
experimental growing
system equipped with
LED lamps, with
modulation of both
quantity and spectra of
the light
Results showed high yield, comprised
from 2 to 3 kg m−2, and nutritional quality
varied among species, and higher
antioxidant compounds were found in red
basil on vermiculite and jute; coconut fiber
allowed the differentiation of crop
performance in terms of sucrose and
above all nitrate; the choice of the
substrate significantly affected the yield,
the dry matter percentage, and the nitrate
concentration
2[94]Influence of substrate: nutrient
film technique (NFT) culture
compared with conventional
soil culture and compost mixed
coco-peat substrate
The treatments were: top
soil (control; T1) as
compost and coir dust
mixture at the rate of 1:1
(T2) and NFT (T3); the
pH and EC of the supply
solution were 5.9 (at 27.9
°C) and 1.5 mS cm−1,
respectively
A significantly high vegetative growth and
total yield was found in the NFT; the
nitrate accumulation was well below the
maximum permissible limit (MPL), set
forth by the recommendations of the
European Health Commission
3[9]Identification and quantification
of polyphenols, major
carotenoids, and macro/micro-
minerals; twenty-seven phenolic
compounds were quantified, of
which the most abundant were:
cichoric acid and rosmarinic
acid
Sodium selenate
applications at three
concentrations (0, 8, and
16 μM Se) on green and
purple basil; Hoagland
nutrient solution was
used, and they used a
pH: 6 and EC: 0.35 dS
cm−1
In green and purple varieties, the 8 μM Se
application enhanced the lutein
concentration by 7% and 19%,
respectively; the same application rate also
increased the overall macroelement
content by 35% and total polyphenols
concentration by 32% but only in the
green; the latter had a tripled chicoric acid
content compared to the untreated control
4[95]Selenium biofortified
microgreens from selenium-
enriched seeds; substrate:
perlite and vermiculite with a
pH: 5.6 and EC: 2.04 dS m−1
Grown in a nutrient
solution containing 0
(control), 4 or 8 mg Se L−1
as sodium selenate
Seeds from plants treated with Se showed
a significantly higher germination index
than seeds from control plants, and the
microgreens retained the Se; the
antioxidant capacity of Se-fortified
microgreens was higher compared to the
control
5[96]Effect of salinity on biomass
yield; for every 10 mM increase
in NaCl, treatment solution EC
increased 1.1 dS m−1; pH: 5.1–
5.2; hydroponic solution pH
decreased slightly during the
experiment (7.5 to 6.8), but all
treatments had similar pH
Two cultivars were
grown hydroponically
for 71 d with four
different concentrations
of NaCl (no NaCl, low,
moderate, and high
(20 dS m−1))
In both cultivars, salinity increased leaf
concentrations of certain caffeic acid
derivatives, caftaric acid, cinnamyl malic
acid, and feruloyl tartaric acid and
decreased concentrations of chicoric acid;
salinity increased leaf concentrations of
the two of the major polyphenolics,
quercetin-rutinoside, and rosmarinic acid;
salinity decreased concentrations of
rosmarinic acid in leaves
6[10]Yield, mineral uptake, and
quality were measured, among
other outputs
Hoagland’s nutrient
solution; pH: 5.56; EC:
1.12 dS cm−1; minimum
and maximum
temperatures: 9.7–43.1
°C; microgreens were
harvested at the first true
leaf stage, with green
and swollen cotyledons
Results showed high concentrations of
some minerals, but their nutrient uptake
was limited due to low yield; nitrates
content was lower if compared with that
usually measured in baby leaf or adult
vegetables of the same species, as well as
the concentration of chlorophylls,
carotenoids, phenols, and sugars
7[97]Nutritional dynamicsCompared between
aquaponic and
hydroponic systems
using crayfish
(Procambarus spp.) as
the aquatic species
Aquaponic (AqB) showed 14%, 56%, and
65% more height, fresh weight, and dry
weight, respectively, compared to
hydroponic (HyB)
8[98]Quantify productivity and
characterize growth of 35
cultivars grown in two
hydroponic production systems
In this study, two
hydroponic systems
were compared: nutrient
film technique (NFT)
and deep flow technique
(DFT) systems, grown
for 3 weeks
Fresh weight of plants grown in DFT
systems was 2.6 g greater compared with
plants grown in NFT systems. Cultivars
differed greatly in fresh weight; however,
the yield seems to be affected more by
cultivar selection than hydroponic
production system
9[99]The nutrient solutions
contained different NO3
concentrations (0.5, 5.0 and 10.0
mol m−3) or NO3/NH4+ molar
ratios (1:0, 1:1 and 0:1; total N
concentration was 10.0 mol m−3);
concentration of other nutrients
were as follows: 1.0 mol m−3 P-
H2PO4, 10.0 mol m−3 K+; 3.0 mol
m−3 Ca2+; 1.5 mol m−3 Mg2+ plus
trace elements
Influence of nitrogen
nutrition on growth and
accumulation of
rosmarinic acid
The use of a total NO3 concentration of 5
mol m−3 resulted in optimal plant growth
and rosmarinic acid production; this
suggests that the standard N concentration
used in hydroponic culture (10 mol m−3 or
higher) could be reduced considerably,
with important implications from the
environmental point of view; in contrast,
the addition of NH4+ to the nutrient
solution was detrimental to both growth
and rosmarinic acid production
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rusu, T.; Cowden, R.J.; Moraru, P.I.; Maxim, M.A.; Ghaley, B.B. Overview of Multiple Applications of Basil Species and Cultivars and the Effects of Production Environmental Parameters on Yields and Secondary Metabolites in Hydroponic Systems. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011332

AMA Style

Rusu T, Cowden RJ, Moraru PI, Maxim MA, Ghaley BB. Overview of Multiple Applications of Basil Species and Cultivars and the Effects of Production Environmental Parameters on Yields and Secondary Metabolites in Hydroponic Systems. Sustainability. 2021; 13(20):11332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011332

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rusu, Teodor, Reed John Cowden, Paula Ioana Moraru, Mihai Avram Maxim, and Bhim Bahadur Ghaley. 2021. "Overview of Multiple Applications of Basil Species and Cultivars and the Effects of Production Environmental Parameters on Yields and Secondary Metabolites in Hydroponic Systems" Sustainability 13, no. 20: 11332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011332

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop