You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Review
  • Open Access

10 May 2021

SGLT2 Inhibitors, What the Emergency Physician Needs to Know: A Narrative Review

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Service of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Department, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
2
Emergency Department, Saint-Joseph Hospital, 75014 Paris, France
3
Service of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
4
Emergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
This article belongs to the Section Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and ertugliflozin belong to a class of antidiabetic treatments referred to as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2 inhibitors, or SGLT2is). SGLT2is are currently indicated in North America and in Europe in type 2 diabetes mellitus, especially in patients with cardiovascular (CV) disease, high CV risk, heart failure, or renal disease. In Europe, dapagliflozin is also approved as an adjunct to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. New data provide evidence for benefits in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and chronic kidney disease, including in patients without diabetes. The use of SGLT2is is expected to increase, suggesting that a growing number of patients will present to the emergency departments with these drugs. Most common adverse events are easily treatable, including mild genitourinary infections and conditions related to volume depletion. However, attention must be paid to some potentially serious adverse events, such as hypoglycemia (when combined with insulin or insulin secretagogues), lower limb ischemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis. We provide an up-to-date practical guide highlighting important elements on the adverse effects of SGLT2is and their handling in some frequently encountered clinical situations such as acute heart failure and decompensated diabetes.

1. Introduction

Sodium glucose-cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are a class of oral antihyperglycemic agents that block glucose and sodium reabsorption in the proximal tubule of the kidney, causing glucosuria and osmotic diuresis. They improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and provide cardiovascular (CV) and renal benefits independently of diabetes status [1,2,3].
Canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and ertugliflozin are indicated as first- or second-line treatments in T2DM individuals with CV disease, high CV risk, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) both in Europe and North America, provided that in some European countries, their use may be prohibited if kidney clearance is below 45 mL/min [4,5]. Dapagliflozin is also indicated in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) independently of diabetes status and, in Europe, as an adjunct to insulin in T1DM [6,7]. Despite an overall favorable safety profile, a few side effects of these medications are important to be aware of, especially in the emergency setting, such as conditions related to volume depletion (hypotension, acute kidney injury), genitourinary infections, and euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (eDKA) [8]. As SGLT2is will be administered in a substantial number of patients in the coming years, emergency physicians should be aware of the action of these drugs and their side effects. In this review, we present practical considerations and recommendations for emergency department (ED) physicians, focusing on side effects and the management of SGLT2is in particular clinical situations.

3. Use of SGLT2is in Particular Clinical Situations

In general, it is advised to discontinue SGLT2is in patients undergoing urgent surgery or hospitalized with any acute serious medical condition (e.g., infections, stroke, acute kidney or liver dysfunction) because of the risk of eDKA. In case of scheduled surgery, the FDA recommends discontinuing SGLT2is 72 h prior to intervention (96 h for ertugliflozin) [34].
However, in certain acute clinical situations, discontinuing the SGLT2i may be debatable. In the following section, we discuss the management of patients taking SGLT2is at baseline, presenting to the ED in four different clinical situations.

3.1. Acute Heart Failure

It is estimated that more than 26 million people suffer from heart failure worldwide, with up to 77% presenting at least once to the ED with decompensated acute heart failure (AHF) [35]. As such, the ED serves as the portal of entry for the majority of AHF admissions, and managing SGLT2is in patients presenting with AHF is already and will become an increasingly frequent challenge in the coming years. The role and use of SGLT2is in AHF has not yet been investigated in large-scale trials. However, in a randomized pilot study comparing empagliflozin against placebo in 80 patients with AHF (with and without T2DM), Damman et al. showed that empagliflozin was associated with a greater urinary output and a reduction in a combined outcome of worsening HF, death, and/or rehospitalization for AHF at 60 days [36]. In a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, SGLT2is are considered as third-line diuretic treatment with added loop diuretics, after thiazides or acetazolamide/amiloride, based on their natriuretic and osmotic diuretic effect [37]. In view of these data, in an AHF patient with a SGLT2i at baseline, it seems reasonable to continue the treatment provided the patient does not have any sign of hemodynamic instability and does not present contraindications or side effects as described above (e.g., eDKA, AKI, hypotension). In patients with “wet” (congestive) AHF, temporarily increasing the dose of the SGLT2i (if possible) may be an option if additional diuretic effect is necessary after the initiation of standard diuretic therapy. In patients with “dry” AHF, keeping the same dose of SGLT2i is an option.

3.2. Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Response

Literature regarding the management of SGLT2is in the setting of patients presenting with atrial fibrillation (AF) with rapid ventricular response is very scarce. However, in authors’ opinion, the decision to discontinue or not the SGLT2i primarily depends on the hemodynamic tolerance of the AF and the volume status. In patients with hemodynamic instability (symptomatic hypotension, cardiogenic shock) and in those presenting with hypovolemia based on clinical and biological evaluation, it seems reasonable to withhold the SGLT2i in addition to general AF management (initiation of rhythm or rate control, fluid resuscitation, and initiation of anticoagulation, if needed).

3.3. Acute Diabetes Decompensation

Acute diabetes decompensation is another commonly encountered condition in the ED and includes hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS), eDKA, and marked hyperglycemia without hyperosmolar or ketosis conditions. Although historically considered as two distinct clinical entities, HHS and eDKA share the same basic pathophysiologic mechanisms: Significant insulin deficiency and increased concentration of counterregulatory hormones such as glucagon, catecholamines, cortisol, and growth hormone. Furthermore, similar to patients with eDKA, those with HHS frequently may present with signs of dehydration, dry mucous membranes and poor skin turgor, or hypotension [38]. Although no clear recommendation regarding HHS and the use of SGLT2is exists, in patients with a SGLT2i at baseline presenting to the ED with HHS, it seems reasonable to initiate standard HHS treatment: fluid resuscitation, insulin infusion, careful electrolyte and glycemia monitoring, and treatment of the underlying cause.

3.4. Gout Attack

SGLT2is have been shown to consistently reduce uric acid concentrations via increased urinary uric acid excretion by approximately 35 45 μmol/L to 45 μmol/L (0.60–0.75 mg/dL). The lowering of uric acid by SGLT2is may partly explain the beneficial CV and renal effects associated with this class of treatments [8]. When compared with traditional hypouricemic treatments (xanthine oxidase inhibitors), their mode of action is different and potentially complementary [39]. Whether SGLT2is may be useful in the management of hyperuricemia is still unknown, but it seems reasonable, in patients with a SGLT2i at baseline and presenting with a gout attack, to continue the SGLT2i, providing they do not have any condition which might put them at risk of developing eDKA (AKI, significant inflammatory syndrome…).
Table 3 summarizes the management of SGLT2is associated with the four precited clinical situations.
Table 3. Proposed management of patients taking SGLT2is at baseline in the case of acute heart failure, atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, acute diabetes decompensation, and gout attack.

3.5. Pregnancy

No well-controlled studies of SGLT2is have been performed in the context of pregnancy. According to animal studies, these drugs may affect renal development. Therefore, SGLT2is should be used in pregnant women only if the benefits justify the risk to the fetus [40].

4. Conclusions

SGLT2is are antidiabetic drugs for which indications are currently rapidly expanding, as new data show beneficial effects not only in patients with T2DM, but also in those with HFrEF and CKD, regardless of the diabetes status. Overall, they are well-tolerated treatments, with mild genital mycotic infections and volume depletion being the most common adverse events. However, as the number of patients taking SGLT2is increases, emergency physicians may be faced with rarer adverse events, some of which, if left unrecognized, could be life-threatening. The risk of adverse events may be reduced by careful patient information and education about self-monitoring. Although it is advised to discontinue SGLT2is in patients undergoing urgent surgery or hospitalized with any acute serious medical condition, in certain acute clinical situations, such as acute heart failure, this may be debatable, as SGLT2 inhibition may actually yield beneficial effects.

Author Contributions

H.L. (Henri Lu), H.L. (Hortense Lu). and R.H. were responsible for the article concept. H.L. (Henri Lu) and H.L. (Hortense Lu) drafted the first version of the article. All authors were responsible for content analysis, assisted in drafting the article, and made critical revisions for important intellectual content. R.H. takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This article received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

H.L. (Henri Lu), H.L. (Hortense Lu), C.K., P.-N.C., M.M., J.M., O.M. and R.H. do not have any conflict of interest in relation with this article. A.W. reports consulting honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca and Janssen. A.Z. reports consulting honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca and Mundipharma. A.Z. also participated in clinical trials for Boehringer Ingelheim. P.M. has participated to meetings organized by Boehringer Ingelheim, whose honoraria have been entirely paid to a private research foundation of the Cardiology Service of the University Hospitals of Geneva (GeCor foundation). The funders had no role in the writing or in the decision to publish the manuscript.

References

  1. McMurray, J.J.V.; Solomon, S.D.; Inzucchi, S.E.; Køber, L.; Kosiborod, M.N.; Martinez, F.A.; Ponikowski, P.; Sabatine, M.S.; Anand, I.S.; Bělohlávek, J.; et al. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 1995–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Packer, M.; Anker, S.D.; Butler, J.; Filippatos, G.; Pocock, S.J.; Carson, P.; Januzzi, J.; Verma, S.; Tsuitsui, H.; Brueckmann, M.; et al. Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1413–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Heerspink, H.J.L.; Stefánsson, B.V.; Correa-Rotter, R.; Chertow, G.M.; Greene, T.; Hou, F.-F.; Mann, J.F.E.; McMurray, J.J.V.; Lindberg, M.; Rossing, P.; et al. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1436–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cosentino, F.; Grant, P.J.; Aboyans, V.; Bailey, C.J.; Ceriello, A.; Delgado, V.; Federici, M.; Filippatos, G.; Grobbee, D.E.; Hansen, T.B.; et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 255–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. American Diabetes Association. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020, 43 (Suppl. 1), S98–S110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Approves New Treatment for a Type of Heart Failure. 2020. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-new-treatment-type-heart-failure (accessed on 13 December 2020).
  7. European Medicines Agency. Forxiga is indicated in adults for the treatment of symptomatic chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. 2020. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/forxiga-epar-product-information_en.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2020).
  8. Lu, H.; Meyer, P.; Hullin, R. Use of SGLT2 inhibtors in cardiovascular diseases: Why, when and how? A narrative literature review. Swiss. Med. Wkly. 2020, 150, w20341. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Guidelines for Preparing Core Clinical-Safety Information on Drugs: Report of CIOMS Working Groups III and V; Including New Proposals for Investigator’s Brochures; CIOMS: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001; Volume 98. [Google Scholar]
  10. McGill, J.B.; Subramanian, S. Safety of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors. Am. J. Med. 2019, 132, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, D.; Wang, T.; Shen, S.; Fang, Z.; Dong, Y.; Tang, H. Urinary tract and genital infections in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2017, 19, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sarafidis, P.A.; Ortiz, A. The risk for urinary tract infections with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: No longer a cause of concern? Clin. Kidney J. 2020, 13, 24–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Donnan, J.R.; Grandy, C.A.; Chibrikov, E.; Marra, C.A.; Aubrey-Bassler, K.; Johnston, K.; Swab, M.; Hache, J.; Curnew, D.; Nguyen, H.; et al. Comparative safety of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e022577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dave, C.V.; Schneeweiss, S.; Kim, D.; Fralick, M.; Tong, A.; Patorno, E. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for Severe Urinary Tract Infections: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Ann. Intern. Med. 2019, 171, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Das, S.R.; Everett, B.M.; Birtcher, K.K.; Brown, J.M.; Cefalu, W.T.; Januzzi, J.L.; Kalyani, R.R.; Kosiborod, M.; Magwire, M.L.; Morris, P.B.; et al. 2018 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Novel Therapies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 72, 3200–3223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vardeny, O.; Vaduganathan, M. Practical Guide to Prescribing Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors for Cardiologists. JACC Heart Fail 2019, 7, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA Strengthens Kidney Warnings for Diabetes Medicines Canagliflozin (Invokana, Invokamet) and Dapagliflozin (Farxiga, Xigduo XR). 2016. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm505860.htm (accessed on 2 March 2020).
  18. Neuen, B.L.; Young, T.; Heerspink, H.J.L.; Neal, B.; Perkovic, V.; Billot, L.; Mahaffey, K.W.; Charytan, D.M.; Wheeler, D.C.; Arnott, C.; et al. SGLT2 inhibitors for the prevention of kidney failure in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019, 7, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Handelsman, Y.; Henry, R.R.; Bloomgarden, Z.T.; Dagogo-Jack, S.; DeFronzo, R.A.; Einhorn, D.; Ferrannini, E.; Fonseca, V.A.; Garber, A.J.; Grunberger, G.; et al. American association of clinical endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology position statement on the association of SGLT-2 inhibitors and diabetic ketoacidosis. Endocr. Pract. 2016, 22, 753–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Goldenberg, R.M.; Berard, L.D.; Cheng, A.Y.Y.; Gilbert, J.D.; Verma, S.; Woo, V.C.; Yale, J.-F. SGLT2 Inhibitor–associated Diabetic Ketoacidosis: Clinical Review and Recommendations for Prevention and Diagnosis. Clin. Ther. 2016, 38, 2654–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Neal, B.; Perkovic, V.; Mahaffey, K.W.; de Zeeuw, D.; Fulcher, G.; Erondu, N.; Shaw, W.; Law, G.; Desai, M.; Matthews, D.R.; et al. Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 644–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wiviott, S.D.; Raz, I.; Bonaca, M.P.; Mosenzon, O.; Kato, E.T.; Cahn, A.; Silverman, M.G.; Zelniker, T.A.; Kuder, J.F.; Murphy, S.A.; et al. Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zinman, B.; Wanner, C.; Lachin, J.M.; Fitchett, D.; Bluhmki, E.; Hantel, S.; Mattheus, M.; Devins, T.; Johansen, O.E.; Woerle, H.J.; et al. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 2117–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fralick, M.; Schneeweiss, S.; Patorno, E. Risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis after Initiation of an SGLT2 Inhibitor. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 2300–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Blau, J.E.; Tella, S.H.; Taylor, S.I.; Rother, K.I. Ketoacidosis associated with SGLT2 inhibitor treatment: Analysis of FAERS data. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2017, 33, e2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dizon, S.; Keely, E.J.; Malcolm, J.; Arnaout, A. Insights into the recognition and management of SGLT2-inhibitor-associated ketoacidosis: It’s not just euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis. Can. J. Diabetes 2017, 41, 499–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lalau, J.D.; Kajbaf, F.; Protti, A.; Christensen, M.M.; De Broe, M.E.; Wiernsperger, N. Metformin-lactic acidosis (MALA): Moving towards a new paradigm. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2017, 19, 1502–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Brown, F.; McColl, T. Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis Secondary to Dapagliflozin Use: A Case Report. J. Emerg. Med. 2018, 54, 109–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Voelzke, B.B.; Hagedorn, J.C. Presentation and diagnosis of Fournier gangrene. Urology 2018, 114, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bersoff-Matcha, S.J.; Chamberlain, C.; Cao, C.; Kortepeter, C.; Chong, W.H. Fournier Gangrene Associated With Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors: A Review of Spontaneous Postmarketing Cases. Ann. Intern. Med. 2019, 170, 764–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Opingari, E.; Partridge, A.C.R.; Verma, S.; Bajaj, H.S. SGLT2 inhibitors: Practical considerations and recommendations for cardiologists. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2018, 33, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wu, J.H.; Foote, C.; Blomster, J.; Toyama, T.; Perkovic, V.; Sundström, J.; Neal, B. Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiovascular events, death and major safety outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016, 4, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guo, M.; Ding, J.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, T.; Liu, C.; Huang, W.; Long, Y.; Gao, C.; Xu, Y. SGLT2 inhibitors and risk of stroke in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2018, 20, 1977–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Revises Labels of SGLT2 Inhibitors for Diabetes to Include Warnings about Too Much Acid in the Blood and Serious Urinary Tract Infections. 2020. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-revises-labels-sglt2-inhibitors-diabetes-include-warnings-about-too-much-acid-blood-and-serious (accessed on 3 March 2021).
  35. Adams, K.F., Jr.; Fonarow, G.C.; Emerman, C.L.; LeJemtel, T.H.; Costanzo, M.R.; Abraham, W.T.; Berkowitz, R.L.; Galvao, M.; Horton, D.P.; for the ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee and Investigators. Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: Rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). Am. Heart J. 2005, 149, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Damman, K.; Beusekamp, J.C.; Boorsma, E.M.; Swart, H.P.; Smilde, T.D.J.; Elvan, A.; van Eck, J.W.M.; Heerspink, H.J.L.; Voors, A.A. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre pilot study on the effects of empagliflozin on clinical outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (EMPA-RESPONSE-AHF). Eur. J. Heart Fail 2020, 22, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Mullens, W.; Damman, K.; Harjola, V.-P.; Mebazaa, A.; Brunner-La Rocca, H.-P.; Martens, P.; Testani, J.M.; Tang, W.H.W.; Orso, F.; Rossignol, P.; et al. The use of diuretics in heart failure with congestion—A position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur. J. Heart Fail 2019, 19, 137–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Umpierrez, G.E.; Murphy, M.B.; Kitabchi, A.E. Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Syndrome. Diabetes Spectr. 2002, 15, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bailey, C.J. Uric acid and the cardio-renal effects of SGLT2 inhibitors. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2019, 21, 1291–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mosley, H.F., II; Smith, L.; Everton, E.; Fellner, C. Sodium-Glucose linked Transporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors in the Management of Type-2 Diabetes: A drug Class Overview. Pharm. Ther. 2015, 40, 451–462. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.