Next Article in Journal
Exploring Neurofunctional Phase Transition Patterns in Autism Spectrum Disorder via Thermodynamics Parameters
Previous Article in Journal
Uncertainty-Aware Remaining Useful Life Prediction via Synergizing TCN–Transformer Networks and Fractional Brownian Motion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Support Size of ε-Capacity-Achieving Inputs for the Amplitude-Constrained AWGN Channel
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Multi-Stream Quickest Change Detection: Foundations and Recent Advances

Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2026, 28(5), 566; https://doi.org/10.3390/e28050566 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 17 April 2026 / Revised: 15 May 2026 / Accepted: 15 May 2026 / Published: 18 May 2026

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of recent developments in quickest change detection (QCD) for high-dimensional multi-sensor systems, with an emphasis on settings involving structural constraints and limited sensing resources. Classical QCD methodologies, while well understood in low-dimensional and fully observed regimes, face significant challenges when extended to modern applications characterized by large-scale data, constrained sampling or communication, and heterogeneous signal structures. We review key approaches for handling high dimensionality, including methods that exploit sparsity, and other forms of signal heterogeneity. Additionally, we discuss sampling constraints, where observations must be selected or acquired sequentially under resource limitations. Multi-stream applications can require making multiple detections, for example when detecting changes separately in different streams. The underlying assumptions on probability models, the types of changes taking place, commonly used decision-making criteria, performance indices, and error types are described. We also briefly discuss the application of machine learning in cases where the underlying probability models are not known, or there is a need to select which sensors should monitor the phenomena because of the large scale of the system.
Keywords: quickest change detection; false discovery rate; adaptive sensing; high-dimensional inference quickest change detection; false discovery rate; adaptive sensing; high-dimensional inference

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Halme, T.; Koivunen, V. Multi-Stream Quickest Change Detection: Foundations and Recent Advances. Entropy 2026, 28, 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28050566

AMA Style

Halme T, Koivunen V. Multi-Stream Quickest Change Detection: Foundations and Recent Advances. Entropy. 2026; 28(5):566. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28050566

Chicago/Turabian Style

Halme, Topi, and Visa Koivunen. 2026. "Multi-Stream Quickest Change Detection: Foundations and Recent Advances" Entropy 28, no. 5: 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28050566

APA Style

Halme, T., & Koivunen, V. (2026). Multi-Stream Quickest Change Detection: Foundations and Recent Advances. Entropy, 28(5), 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28050566

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop