Next Article in Journal
Finite-Key Analysis for Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete-Phase Randomization
Next Article in Special Issue
Molten Salt Corrosion Behavior of Dual-Phase High Entropy Alloy for Concentrating Solar Power Systems
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Temporal Network-Embedding Algorithm for Link Prediction in Dynamic Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Review of Novel High-Entropy Protective Materials: Wear, Irradiation, and Erosion Resistance Properties
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Entropy
Volume 25
Issue 2
10.3390/e25020256
entropy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microstructure, Phase Evolution, and Chemical Behavior of CrCuFeNiTiAlx High Entropy Alloys Processed by Mechanical Alloying

by
Anay del Ángel-González
1,
Greysi D. Tapía-Higuera
1,
Ibeth Rivera-Ortiz
1,
José A. Castillo-Robles
1,
José A. Rodríguez-García
1,
Carlos A. Calles-Arriaga
1,
José G. Miranda-Hernández
2 and
Enrique Rocha-Rangel
1,*
1
Departamento de Investigación y Posgrado, Universidad Politécnica de Victoria, Ciudad Victoria 87138, Mexico
2
Centro Universitario UAEM Valle de México, Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo de Materiales Industriales, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Atizapán de Zaragoza 54500, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2023, 25(2), 256; https://doi.org/10.3390/e25020256
Submission received: 2 January 2023 / Revised: 16 January 2023 / Accepted: 23 January 2023 / Published: 31 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in High-Entropy Alloys)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
High entropy alloys (HEAs) of the type CrCuFeNiTi-Alx were processed through mechanical alloying. The aluminum concentration was varied in the alloy, to determine its effect on the HEAs’ microstructure, phase formation, and chemical behavior. X-ray diffraction studies performed on the pressureless sintered samples revealed the presence of structures composed of face centered cubic (FCC) and body centered cubic (BCC) solid-solution phases. Since the valences of the elements that form the alloy are different, a nearly stoichiometric compound was obtained, increasing the final entropy of the alloy. The aluminum was partly responsible for this situation, which also favored transforming part of the FCC phase into BCC phase on the sintered bodies. X-ray diffraction also indicated the formation of different compounds with the alloy’s metals. Bulk samples exhibited microstructures with different phases. The presence of these phases and the results of the chemical analyses revealed the formation of alloying elements that, in turn, formed a solid solution and, consequently, had a high entropy. From the corrosion tests, it could be concluded that the samples with a lower aluminum content were the most resistant to corrosion.

1. Introduction

Metals and their alloys have been part of the solution to the significant challenges faced by humanity since ancient times. These materials generally seek a combination of properties by adding small quantities of one or more metallic element to the main metal. A breakthrough came in 2004 when studies were published on the production of high entropy alloys (HEAs), which represent a new family of metallic materials, opening a new field of study within alloys. High entropy alloys (HEAs) were first described in 2004 [1,2,3] as compounds with at least five metallic elements present in equimolar amounts in the alloy. Despite a large number of alloying elements, HEAs can exhibit simple solid solution phases, such as face centered cubic (FCC); body centered cubic (BCC); and sometimes, depending on the alloying elements, hexagonal phases [4,5,6]. These alloys exhibit a high chemical and thermal stability, which is attributed to the high entropy of mixing associated with a disordered solution of various elements, which is presumed to dominate the enthalpy of phase formation [7,8,9].
High entropy alloys arise from the need to develop new materials for structural applications, where an exceptional mechanical response with properties such as increased strength, good ductility, excellent fracture toughness, good creep, wear resistance, and thermochemical stability are required [10,11]. To date, the most studied system is the one reported in the literature as Cantor alloy, which is composed of CoCrFeMnNi [2]. Recently, the addition of different elements to optimize the microstructure and properties of this system has received attention [12,13,14]. However, the reinforcement mechanisms remain to be clarified [15,16]. A primary characteristic of these studies is that, in many cases, the alloys were manufactured through electric arc furnace melting and casting processes, which leads to the segregation of some elements, such as Cu and Co. HEAs powders can be prepared by mechanical alloying (MA), and then powders can subsequently be sintered to form bulk HEAs, to eliminate casting defects and improve the microstructure. In addition, mechanical alloying also decreases the tendency toward order and leads to an extended solid solubility. Furthermore, the MA route has also been established to facilitate the formation of nanocrystalline HEAs [17]. In this way, metals are processed by mechanical alloying different systems based on CoCrFeMnNi alloy, and other elements such as Al, Mo, Ti, and Zn have been added, seeking to improve the properties of the resultant alloys and trying to explain the mechanism of reinforcement, through observations of the microstructure and measurements of different properties [11,18].
With the development of Ni-based superalloys a few decades ago, a solution to the requirement for structural metals capable of resisting corrosive environments at elevated temperatures was found. Hence, many of the applications of superalloys have been oriented toward the construction of turbines and engine parts. Gas turbines are used to power aircraft, trains, ships, electric generators, and other power generation equipment. Since the working pressures and temperatures must be very high to obtain the best turbine efficiency, materials with a high chemical, thermal, and mechanical stability are needed, to allow them to work under these extreme conditions. Due to their good stability and mechanical properties, high entropy alloys have been proposed for application in the construction of those turbine components that are most exposed to the action of the gases being burned in the turbine. In our group, we have studied the synthesis and mechanical properties of CrCuFeNiTiAlx (where x = 0, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5 mol %) alloy [19]. In this system, Cr promotes FCC structures, while Cu, Ni, and Ti promote the formation of BCC structures; Ni can help to form both g and g’ phases in superalloys [20,21,22], whereas the mixture of Cr, Ni, and Ti gives corrosion resistance to the alloy [20,21]. Moreover, the addition of Al favors the formation of intermetallic compounds with Fe, Ni, and Ti and also helps to improve corrosion resistance, resulting in lighter alloys [22]. Therefore, the objective of this work was the production through mechanical alloying of various HEAs of the CrCuFeNiTi system, doped with Alx (x = 0, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5% mol), seeking to determine the effect of aluminum on the microstructure, phase evolution, and chemical behavior of the resulting alloy.

2. Materials and Methods

Elemental powders of Al, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni, and Ti (SkySpring Nanomaterials, Inc., Houston, TX, USA 99.95%, −325 mesh) were mechanically processed with a planetary mill (Retch, PM100, Duesseldorf, Germany), using ZrO2 (Tosoh, Grove City, OH, USA) balls of (3 mm in diameter) as the grinding medium and a ball to powder ratio of 12:1 (in weight). Milling was conducted at 300 rpm for 360 min, and 3 mL of isopropyl alcohol was used to control the powder particles’ size distribution and segregation during the ball milling action. The studied system was CrCuFeNiTiAlx, where x = 0, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5 mol %; the rest of the metals were added in equimolar fractions. Samples were labeled as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 for aluminum contents of x = 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0 mol %, respectively. With the help of a uniaxial press (Montequipo, LAB-30-T, México City, Mexico), the resulting powder from the grinding stage was formed into cylindrical samples of 1.0 by 0.4 cm in diameter and thickness, respectively, using 300 MPa. The pressureless formed samples were sintered in an electrical furnace (Thermo Scientific Thermolyne FB1315M, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) at 1300 °C for 2 h in an inert atmosphere. Before characterization of the sintered samples, they were ground with SiC sandpaper and then polished using alumina and diamond suspensions. The crystalline phases of the sintered alloys were determined using X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) with Cu-Kα monochromatic radiation (k = 1.5406 Å) using a step of 0.017 °C and 100 s, performed on X’Pert PRO PANalytical and interpreted with the X’Pert Highscore Plus PANalytical software, using patterns from the ICDD PDF2 database [23]. Next, the obtained microstructure was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and an energy dispersion spectrometer detector (EDS) on a Hitachi SU3500 microscope. The mechanical properties evaluated were as follows: The ultrasonic method determined Young’s modulus, following ASTM standards [24], using Grindosonic A-360 Japanese manufacturing equipment. Microhardness was evaluated in agreement with the ASTM E384–16 standard [25]. In this case, twelve measurements were performed and each of the indentations was made at a spacing distance of at least 5 times the size of each print; the used load was 9.8N for 15 s, and these measurements were performed with a microhardness tester (Wilson Instruments Model S400, USA). The compressive strength was evaluated with a Universal Material Tester WP 300 Gunt. Measurements were taken for 42 days for each of the alloys, which were immersed in a 3% NaCl solution, to simulate an aggressive marine environment, using an Ag/AgCl reference electrode and a Steren multimeter (MUL-005), in order to obtain the corrosion potentials. Linear polarization resistance measurements were performed using a three-electrode array, an Ag/AgCl electrode as a reference, the study sample, and a graphite rod as a counter electrode. Linear polarization resistance was measured according to ASTM G59-97 [26], with operating parameters of ± 15 mV with respect to the corrosion potential (Ecorr), at a sweep rate of 10 mV/min over 42 days.

3. Results

3.1. Phase Analysis

The XRD diffractograms presented in Figure 1 indicate that the samples contained very similar phases related to their metallic compounds, intermetallics, and traces of iron and copper oxides. The diffraction patterns showed that solid solutions with a combination of FCC and BCC crystal structures were formed. These crystal structures correspond to those of the alloying metals. However, various compounds formed by the alloying elements were also detected, as depicted in Table 1. The formation of these compounds was due to the type of crystal structure of the interacting element influencing the alloying mechanism, so elements of the same crystal structure were readily dissolved from each other, as was previously documented [27,28]. Previous studies revealed that the alloying order is associated with the melting point of the elements, i.e., the lower the melting point, the easier it is to be alloyed; this is one of the explanations for why aluminum forms several intermetallic compounds [10]. As can be seen in Table 1, Fe, Cr, and Cu oxides were generated during processing. The formation of these oxides is not necessarily negative. Several studies established that configurational disorder can be compositionally engineered into mixed oxides by populating a single sublattice with many distinct cations. The formulations promote novel and entropy-stabilized forms of crystalline matter, where metal cations are incorporated in new ways [29,30]. Finally, Figure 1 shows two small peaks at 40.3 and 56.2 at 2 θ angles, corresponding to a hexagonal close packed (HCP) structure. The presence of this phase was due to the addition of Ti, with Ti being the metal with the highest melting point, only below Cr. However, it is also the metal with the largest atomic radius with an HCP crystalline structure. Both conditions of Ti hindered its solubility in the alloy, hence the two peaks with the HCP phase that appear in the spectra.

3.2. Lattice Constant

The lattice constants of the synthesized alloys were calculated using Bragg’s law equation through the interplanar distance (dhkl), using the peaks at 2θ = 43.2 and 43.8 °C that correspond to the (111) and (110) planes for the FCC and BCC structures, respectively. Knowing the value of dhkl and using Equation (1) that relates the interplanar distance to the lattice parameter in cubic systems, the latter was determined, and the results are plotted in Figure 2 as a function of the aluminum content in the alloy. In this figure, as the aluminum proportion increases, a considerable increment in the lattice constants of both structures (FCC and BCC) is observed. However, the increment of the lattice constant was more significant for aluminum contents between 0.5 and 2.5% mol in the alloy; for aluminum contents of 5% mol, the increment in lattice constant continued; however, this increment was small. These increases in the lattice constant were associated with the transformation of the FCC crystal structure, first into a mixture of FCC and BCC structures for aluminum contents between 0.5 and 2.5% mol, and then into a dominant BCC structure at a higher aluminum concentration. This phase transformation can be explained as follows: due to its low melting point, aluminum is the first element to be dissolved, diminishing the amount of FCC phase as the aluminum content increases in the alloys. The next metal to dissolve is Cu, which has a smaller atomic radius, further reducing the amount of FCC. Finally, since Cr and Ni are solubilized into the Fe crystalline lattice, there appears to be a greater amount of BCC phase. The latter can be demonstrated by observing the compounds formed and presented in Table 1.
a = dhkl(√h2 + √k2 + √l2)

3.3. Structural Transformation from FCC to FCC + BCC and BCC

As previously discussed, aluminum plays an essential role in the random formation of a solid solution composed of several metals and presenting a mixture of FCC and BCC structure. For the CrCuFeNiTi system studied here, this random solid solution distribution is schematically drawn in Figure 3a, where the Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni, and Ti cations occupy a face-centered cubic (FCC) atomic lattice structure. Since the valence of the cations that form the alloy were different, a nearly stoichiometric compound was obtained, thus increasing the entropy of the alloy. This phase transformation can be explained as follows: due to its low melting point, aluminum is the first element to be dissolved, diminishing the amount of FCC phase as the aluminum content was increased in the alloys. The next metal to dissolve was Cu, which has a smaller atomic radius, further reducing the amount of the FCC. Finally, since Cr and Ni were solubilized into the Fe crystalline lattice, there appears to be a greater amount of BCC phase.

3.4. Microstructure and Chemical Analysis

The microstructure of the various prepared CrCuFeNiTiAlx alloys was characterized by SEM, as shown in Figure 4. In this figure, the microstructures with different phases can be observed and distinguished by their different shades, indicating a variation in the chemical composition of these phases (different phases are labeled in microstructures). Element distribution mapping was performed to corroborate the alloy’s composition. The result of this mapping analysis is shown to the right side of each alloy in Figure 4. The obtained spectrum, which presents the components of the alloy, and a chart with the chemical analysis results, indicate that the resulting chemical composition was close to the hypothesized composition. The presence of these phases in the microstructure and the results of the chemical analyses suggest the formation of alloys between the used elements that, in turn, form a solid solution and, consequently, have a high entropy.
The microstructures in Figure 4 are generally composed of irregular grains of different sizes and morphologies. Bulk samples exhibited particles with multimodal grain sizes, ranging from 0.5 to 50 microns. In the microstructure, larger grains with different contrast (brighter) and characteristics are observed. These bright grains observed at different aluminum concentrations are associated with the presence of the different metallic compounds formed during the processing of the alloys, as was detected by XRD. The greater the amount of Al in the HEAs, the less porosity was observed, i.e., a higher bulk density was achieved. Good densification of the alloys, together with the diversity of phases observed in the microstructure and the fine grain size present, made it possible to obtain alloys with favorable mechanical characteristics.

3.5. EDS Mappings

Through observations and analysis with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), mapping was performed of each sample to verify the spatial distribution of the alloy components. Figure 5 shows a typical mapping of those performed on the different alloys. The elemental mapping indicated that the samples with sintered CrCuFeNiTiAlx alloys possessed a multi-phase microstructure, as can be seen in the figure by means of the labels placed on the different phases of the microstructure. In the mapping, spatial regions with a good distribution of alloying elements indicated the formation of the high entropy alloys sought here. From these results, it can be inferred that the microstructure of this alloy was composed of a high Cu, Fe, and Ni solid solution (light region); a dark region composed of Ti and Cr; and dispersed chromium and copper oxide phases.

3.6. Mechanical Properties

The studied HEAs’ crystalline lattice comprises six metallic elements, each of a different chemical valence and atomic radii. Electrochemical bonding between dissimilar atoms with chemical affinity and atomic size differences undoubtedly leads to lattice distortion [31,32]. The stored strain energy related to the lattice distortion increases the overall free energy of the HEA lattice, thus influencing the physical–chemical properties of the resulting HEAs. In these alloys, Al is present; this is a soft metal with a low melting point, whose addition to HEA alloys leads to their hardening, while diminishing the alloys’ stiffness. Table 2 shows how the microhardness of the sintered CuCrFeNiTiAlx alloys increased, whereas the elastic modulus decreased as a function of the Al content. Evidently, the alloy was hardened significantly by the addition of Al. This result was partly due to the formation of a hard BCC phase and intermetallic compounds of Al with Fe, Ni, and Ti [33]. The results of compressive strength measurements of the manufactured alloys are presented in Table 2. From this table, it can be seen that the sample with 1% Al had the highest compressive strength value. However, the compressive strength decreased considerably for higher aluminum contents (2.5 and 5%), whereas for low values of aluminum (0 or 0.5%), the compressive strength presented acceptable values. These increases in compressive strength may have been due to the nanosized powders obtained from the milling stage (mechanical alloying). According to the Hall–Petch equation, there is an inversely proportional relationship between a material’s strength and grain size, where the reduction in grain size leads to an increase in material strength [30]. On the other hand, Figure 2 shows a transformation of the FCC crystal structure for 0% Al contents to a FCC + BCC mixture for contents of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5% Al and to BCC for 5% Al contents. At 0.5% Al, the first crystal structure transformation began, obtaining a FCC + BCC mixture, while at 2.5%, this transformation was completed and basically becomes BCC. According to the principal structural factor, a structure with a more slippery system leads to lower lattice friction during dislocation motion and increases the samples’ elasticity [34]. The FCC structure has 48 slip systems, against the BCC structure with 12 slip systems [35]. In this study, the composite contained two FCC phase residues and a single BCC phase. The FCC phases became dominant and hence increased the compression strength and the work hardening effect, and caused the decrease in the stiffness of the alloy observed in Table 2. From all this, it can be said that, because aluminum melts at low temperatures, it generates solution mechanisms, thus greatly contributing to the hardening and reinforcement of the alloy. In conclusion, by increasing the Al concentration, HEA undergoes a microstructural transformation, from a single FCC phase to a coexisting phase mixture of FCC and BCC phases, as well as the precipitation of some intermetallic compounds.

3.7. Chemical Behavior

The variation of corrosion potential over time for working specimens containing the CuCrFeNiAlx alloy (x = 0, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 2.5, 5 mol %) in a 3% NaCl solution can be seen in Figure 6. It is observed that negative corrosion potentials with a 90% probability of corrosion, as per ASTM C876-15 [36], applied to samples 3, 4, and 5, since they are located in the zone with a high probability of corrosion after being submerged for 42 days in 3% NaCl solution. Comparing working samples 1 and 2, we observed that they were initially located in the zone with a 10% probability of corrosion. However, sample 2, 14 days after being submerged in the solution, showed a drop in potential due to the breakage of the passive layer formed by the corrosion products, which placed it in the 50% corrosion probability zone. Sample 1, with a high percentage of copper and titanium and without aluminum, had a lower corrosion rate, which placed it as the specimen with the highest corrosion resistance.
The linear polarization resistance as a function of time for the different alloys under study in 3% NaCl solution is shown in Figure 7. It can be observed in the graph that samples 3, 4, and 5 showed little resistance, with values between 1 × 104 and 1 × 106 ohms•m2, in comparison to samples 1 and 2, which showed a greater resistance to the solution, with ascending values between 1 × 106 and 1 × 107 ohms•m2, and obtaining a better performance. This behavior is in agreement with the results of the corrosion potential measurements. Therefore, it can be concluded that the samples with a lower aluminum content were the most resistant to corrosion.

4. Conclusions

Through the proposed methodology, involving high-energy mechanical milling combined with sintering without the application of pressure, it was possible to manufacture high entropy alloys of the CuCrFeNiTiAlx system. Here, the effect of Al on the microstructure, phase evolution, and chemical behavior of the resulting alloys was studied. The following are the main conclusions reached in this study:
The powder metallurgy process was proven as an effective experimental route to retain the characteristic microstructure of high entropy alloys. Since milling induces a finer particle size and high lattice distortion, both conditions facilitate metal bonding in the solid state. Furthermore, sintering promotes metal diffusion and, consequently, their solubility and sample densification.
Based on the XRD studies, as the Al concentration increases, high entropy alloys undergo a microstructural transformation, from a single FCC phase to a mixture of coexisting phases made of FCC and BCC phases, as well as the precipitation of different compounds such as FeNi, Al3Ni, CrNiFe, TiAl, and Ti3Al.
The HEA alloy that achieved the highest hardness had the highest Al content. These alloys were hardened significantly with the addition of Al, due to the formation of the BCC phase, the strong atomic bonding between Al and other elements, the larger atomic radius of Al, and the fact that aluminum forms intermetallic compounds, particularly with Ni and Ti.
Samples with a lower aluminum content were the most resistant to corrosion.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.R.-R., J.A.C.-R. and J.G.M.-H.; methodology, A.d.Á.-G., G.D.T.-H. and I.R.-O.; validation, A.d.Á.-G., G.D.T.-H. and I.R.-O.; formal analysis, E.R.-R., J.A.R.-G. and CACA; investigation, A.d.Á.-G., G.D.T.-H. and I.R.-O.; resources, J.A.C.-R., J.A.R.-G. and J.G.M.-H.; data curation, A.d.Á.-G., G.D.T.-H., I.R.-O. and J.A.R.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, E.R.-R. and J.A.C.-R.; writing—review and editing, C.A.C.-A.; visualization, E.R.-R., J.A.C.-R. and J.G.M.-H.; supervision, E.R.-R.; project administration, E.R.-R.; funding acquisition, E.R.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by COTACyT under Grant 2021-01-01.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

In this study new data were not created.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yeh, J.W.; Chen, S.K.; Lin, S.J.; Gan, J.; Chin, T.-S.; Shun, T.-T.; Tsau, C.-H.; Chang, S.-Y. Nanostructured high-entropy alloys with multiple principal elements: Novel alloy design concepts and outcomes. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2004, 6, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cantor, B.; Chang, I.T.H.; Knight, P.; Vincent, A.J.B. Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 375, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huang, P.K.; Yeh, J.W.; Shun, T.T.; Chen, S.K. Multi-principal-element alloys with improved oxidation and wear resistance for thermal spray coating. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2004, 6, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Miracle, D.B.; Senkov, O.N. A critical review of high entropy alloys and related concepts. Acta Mater. 2017, 122, 448–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Manzonia, A.M.; Glatzelb, U. New multiphase compositionally complex alloys driven by the high entropy alloy approach. Mater. Charact. 2019, 147, 512–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. MacDonald, B.E.; Fu, Z.; Zheng, B.; Fu, Z.; Zheng, B.; Chen, W.; Lin, Y.; Chen, F.; Zhang, L.; Ivanisenko, J.; et al. Recent progress in high entropy alloy research. JOM 2017, 69, 2024–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mao, H.H.; Chen, H.L.; Chen, Q. TCHEA1: A thermodynamic database not limited for “high entropy” alloys. J. Phase Equilibria Diffus. 2017, 38, 353–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Otto, F.; Yang, Y.; Bei, H.; George, E.P. Relative effects of enthalpy and entropy on the phase stability of equiatomic high-entropy alloys. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 2628–2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Poletti, M.G.; Battezzati, L. Electronic and thermodynamic criteria for the occurrence of high-entropy alloys in metallics systems. Acta Mater. 2014, 75, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, Y.L.; Hu, Y.H.; Hsieh, C.A. Competition between elements during mechanical alloying in an octonary multi-principal-element alloy system. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 481, 768–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sriharitha, R.; Murty, B.S.; Kottada, R.S. Phase formation in mechanically alloyed AlxCoCrCuFeNi (x=0.45, 1, 2.5, 5 mol) high entropy alloys. Intermetallics 2013, 32, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Joseph, J.; Haghdadi, N.; Annasamy, M.; Kada, S.; Hodgson, P.; Barnett, M.; Fabijanic, D. On the enhanced wear resistance of CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloy at intermediate temperature. Scr. Mater. 2020, 186, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Liao, W.-B.; Chen, H.; Brechtl, J.; Song, W.; Yin, W.; He, Z.; Liaw, P.; Zhang, Y. A low-density high-entropy dual-phase alloy with hierarchical structure and exceptional specific yield strength. Sci. China Mater. 2022, 66, 780–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, C.; Zhang, H.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wei, R.; Wang, T.; Zhang, T.; Li, F. A novel ultrafine-grained high entropy alloy with excellent combination of mechanical and soft magnetic properties. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2020, 502, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Z.; Raabe, D. Strong and ductile non-equiatomic high-entropy alloys: Design, processing, microstructure, and mechanical properties. JOM 2017, 69, 2099–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Schuh, B.; Mendez-Martin, F.; Völker, B. Mechanical properties, microstructure and thermal stability of a nanocrystalline CoCrFeMnNi high-entropy alloy after severe plastic deformation. Acta Mater. 2015, 96, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Fan, Y.H.; Zhang, Y.P.; Guan, H.G.; Suo, H.M.; He, L. AlNiCrFexMo0.2CoCu high entropy alloys prepared by powder metallurgy. Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 2013, 42, 1127–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marych, M.V.; Bagliuk, G.A.; Mamonova, A.A.; Gripachevskii, A.N. The influence of production conditions on the structure, phase composition, and properties of the high-entropy Ti-Cr-Fe-Ni-Cu alloy. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 2019, 57, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ruiz-Jasso, G.E.; la Torre, S.D.-d.; Escalona-González, R.; Méndez-García, J.C.; Robles, J.A.C.; Refugio-García, E.; Rangel, E.R. Synthesis of CuCrFeNiTiAlx High Entropy Alloys by Means of Mechanical Alloying and Spark Plasma Sintering. Can. Metall. Q. 2021, 60, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Manzoni, A.M.; Singh, S.; Daoud, H.M.; Popp, R.; Völkl, R.; Glatzel, U.; Wanderka, N. On the path to optimizing the Al-Co-Cr-Cu-Fe-Ni-Ti high entropy alloy family for high temperature applications. Entropy 2016, 18, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Manzoni, A.; Singh, S.; Daoud, H.; Popp, R.; Völkl, R.; Glatzel, U.; Wanderka, N. On the Optimization of the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al-Co-Cr-Cu-Fe-Ni-Ti -Based High Entropy Alloys. Jordan J. Phys. 2015, 8, 177. [Google Scholar]
  22. Xiao, D.; Zhou, P.; Wu, W.; Diao, H.; Gao, M.; Song, M.; Liaw, P. Microstructure, mechanical and corrosion behaviors of AlCoCuFeNi-(Cr,Ti) high entropy alloys. Mater. Des. 2017, 116, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Available online: https://www.icdd.com/pdf-2/ (accessed on 10 January 2023).
  24. Wolfenden, A.; Harmouche, M.R.; Blessing, G.V.; Chen, Y.T.; Dayal, P.T.V.; Kinra, V.K.; Lemmens, J.W.; Phillips, R.R.; Smith, J.S.; Mahrnoodi, P.; et al. Dynamic Young’s Modulus Measurements in Metallic Materials: Results of an Interlaboratory Testing Program. J. Test. Eval. 1989, 17, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. ASTM E384–16; Standard Test Method for Microindentation Hardness of Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016.
  26. ASTM G59-97; Standard Test Method for Conducting Potentiodynamic Polarization Resistance Measurements. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014.
  27. Zhou, Y.J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.L.; Chen, G.L. Solid solution alloys of AlCoCrFeNiTix with excellent room-temperature mechanical properties. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 181904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shackelford, J.F.; Han, Y.-H.; Kim, S.; Kwon, S.-H. CRC Materials Science and Engineering Handbook, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lei, Z.; Liu, X.; Wu, Y.; Wang, H.; Jiang, S.; Wang, S.; Hui, X.; Wu, Y.; Gault, B.; Kontis, P.; et al. Enhanced strength and ductility in a high-entropy alloy via ordered oxygen complexes. Nature 2018, 563, 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rost, C.M.; Sachet, E.; Borman, T.; Moballegh, A.; Dickey, E.C.; Hou, D.; Jones, J.L.; Curtarolo, S.; Maria, J.P. Entropy-stabilized oxides. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8485–8490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Bracq, G.; Laurent-Brocq, M.; Perrière, L.; Pirès, R.; Joubert, J.M.; Guillot, I. The fcc solid solution stability in the Co-Cr-Fe-Mn-Ni multi-component system. Acta Mater. 2017, 128, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Baglyuk, G.A.; Marich, M.V.; Mamonova, A.A.; Gripachevskii, A.N. Features of structurization during sintering of compacts from a multicomponent Ti-Cr-Fe-Ni-Cu Charge. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 2016, 54, 543–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Abu-Odeh, A.; Galvan, E.; Kirk, T.; Mao, H.; Chen, Q.; Mason, P.; Malak, R.; Arróyave, R. Efficient exploration of the high entropy alloy composition-phase space. Acta Mater. 2018, 152, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dieter, G.E.; Bacon, D.J. Mechanical Metallurgy; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1986; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  35. Askeland, D.R.; Fulay, P.P.; Wright, W.J. The Science and Engineering of Materials, 7th ed.; Cengage Learning: Stamford, CT, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  36. ASTM C876-15; Standard Test Method for Half-Cell Potentials of Uncoated Reinforcing Steel in Concrete. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2008.
Entropy 25 00256 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns of sintered high entropy CrCuFeNiTiAlx alloys with different Al contents. It is observed that Al-intermetallic and other compounds are formed with Al addition.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of sintered high entropy CrCuFeNiTiAlx alloys with different Al contents. It is observed that Al-intermetallic and other compounds are formed with Al addition.
Entropy 25 00256 g001
Entropy 25 00256 g002 550
Figure 2. FCC and BCC lattices constants of CrCuFeNiTiAlx alloy, as a function of Al addition.
Figure 2. FCC and BCC lattices constants of CrCuFeNiTiAlx alloy, as a function of Al addition.
Entropy 25 00256 g002
Entropy 25 00256 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Schematic representation of the randomly distributed solid solution structure typical of HEAs made out of Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni, Ti, and Al, which is organized on a distorted FCC crystal structure. (b) and (c) transformation of FCC to BCC.
Figure 3. (a) Schematic representation of the randomly distributed solid solution structure typical of HEAs made out of Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni, Ti, and Al, which is organized on a distorted FCC crystal structure. (b) and (c) transformation of FCC to BCC.
Entropy 25 00256 g003
Entropy 25 00256 g004 550
Figure 4. Microstructure and chemical analysis of CrCuFeNiTiAlx alloys.
Figure 4. Microstructure and chemical analysis of CrCuFeNiTiAlx alloys.
Entropy 25 00256 g004
Entropy 25 00256 g005 550
Figure 5. Mappings performed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy of each sample, to verify the spatial distribution of the alloy components.
Figure 5. Mappings performed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy of each sample, to verify the spatial distribution of the alloy components.
Entropy 25 00256 g005
Entropy 25 00256 g006 550
Figure 6. Time-dependent corrosion potential variation of different alloys in 3% NaCl solution.
Figure 6. Time-dependent corrosion potential variation of different alloys in 3% NaCl solution.
Entropy 25 00256 g006
Entropy 25 00256 g007 550
Figure 7. Variation of linear polarization resistance as a function of time for different alloys in 3% NaCl solution.
Figure 7. Variation of linear polarization resistance as a function of time for different alloys in 3% NaCl solution.
Entropy 25 00256 g007
Table
Table 1. Phases in the diffraction patterns of Figure 1. Sample 4 presented the highest amount of oxidized phases.
Table 1. Phases in the diffraction patterns of Figure 1. Sample 4 presented the highest amount of oxidized phases.
PhaseChemical FormulaSample
12345
Iron NickelFe0.64Ni0.36xxxx
Iron NickelFeNixxx x
AwaruiteFeNi x
Chromium Iron NickelCrNiFexxx x
Aluminum NickelAlNi3 x
Copper NickelCu3.8Nixx
Udimet 500Ni3AlTixxxxx
Copper OxideCu2Oxxxxx
Hematite, synFe2O3xxx
Chromium oxideCr2O3 x
Copper Iron
Titanium Oxide		Cu1.2Ti0.2Fe1.6O4 x
Copper Iron
Titanium		Cu1.2Ti0.2Fe1.6 x
Table
Table 2. Mechanical properties of CuCrFeNiTiAlx alloys.
Table 2. Mechanical properties of CuCrFeNiTiAlx alloys.
SampleHardness
(HV)		Elastic Modulus
(GPa)		Compressive Strength
(KN/mm2)
1427167 +/− 102211
2467161 +/− 91777
3480153 +/− 92393
4540142 +/− 101973
5555137 +/− 91043
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

del Ángel-González, A.; Tapía-Higuera, G.D.; Rivera-Ortiz, I.; Castillo-Robles, J.A.; Rodríguez-García, J.A.; Calles-Arriaga, C.A.; Miranda-Hernández, J.G.; Rocha-Rangel, E. Microstructure, Phase Evolution, and Chemical Behavior of CrCuFeNiTiAlx High Entropy Alloys Processed by Mechanical Alloying. Entropy 2023, 25, 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25020256

AMA Style

del Ángel-González A, Tapía-Higuera GD, Rivera-Ortiz I, Castillo-Robles JA, Rodríguez-García JA, Calles-Arriaga CA, Miranda-Hernández JG, Rocha-Rangel E. Microstructure, Phase Evolution, and Chemical Behavior of CrCuFeNiTiAlx High Entropy Alloys Processed by Mechanical Alloying. Entropy. 2023; 25(2):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25020256

Chicago/Turabian Style

del Ángel-González, Anay, Greysi D. Tapía-Higuera, Ibeth Rivera-Ortiz, José A. Castillo-Robles, José A. Rodríguez-García, Carlos A. Calles-Arriaga, José G. Miranda-Hernández, and Enrique Rocha-Rangel. 2023. "Microstructure, Phase Evolution, and Chemical Behavior of CrCuFeNiTiAlx High Entropy Alloys Processed by Mechanical Alloying" Entropy 25, no. 2: 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25020256

APA Style

del Ángel-González, A., Tapía-Higuera, G. D., Rivera-Ortiz, I., Castillo-Robles, J. A., Rodríguez-García, J. A., Calles-Arriaga, C. A., Miranda-Hernández, J. G., & Rocha-Rangel, E. (2023). Microstructure, Phase Evolution, and Chemical Behavior of CrCuFeNiTiAlx High Entropy Alloys Processed by Mechanical Alloying. Entropy, 25(2), 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25020256

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop