Next Article in Journal
A Theoretical Comparative Study of Vapor-Compression Refrigeration Cycle using Al2O3 Nanoparticle with Low-GWP Refrigerants
Previous Article in Journal
Informational Entropy Threshold as a Physical Mechanism for Explaining Tree-like Decision Making in Humans
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Hybrid Quantum Image-Matching Algorithm

Entropy 2022, 24(12), 1816; https://doi.org/10.3390/e24121816
by Guoqiang Shu, Zheng Shan *, Shiqin Di, Xiaodong Ding and Congcong Feng
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Entropy 2022, 24(12), 1816; https://doi.org/10.3390/e24121816
Submission received: 20 October 2022 / Revised: 9 December 2022 / Accepted: 12 December 2022 / Published: 13 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Quantum Information)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper proposes a hybrid quantum image matching method. The only contribution is to introduce quantum to image matching. 

There are many serious problem:

1. The related work is almostly ignored. 

2. The abstract and introduction are required to be re-organized. That is, the motivation and contributions are not clear.

3. The experiment is also not convincing. The datasets are very small. There are not one competting methods! 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

as attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

 

The goal of this research is image matching. A classical and quantum hybrid algorithm is proposed, which is based on classical feature matching and quantum similarity measurement method. The algorithm shows quadratic acceleration ability and the effectiveness is verified in the experiment. Having said that, I still have some comments and suggestions.

Point 1: The manuscript proposes a hybrid quantum algorithm and points out in the abstract that the algorithm has lower complexity. But it does not mention how to reduce the complexity.

Point 2Figure 3 shows that the vector set is represented as a labeled superposition states. Whether the method is still feasible when the dimensions of vectors are different needs further analysis and discussions.

Point 3In the part of experimental results, the reasons for the differences of results under different methods should be analyzed in more detail.

Point 4: The number of keywords can be further increased to reflect the main methods and characteristics of the research.

Point 5: In the representation of the next line of Eq. 8, the superscript of I should include n.

Point 6: The case of some words should be consistent, for example: ‘Swap-test’.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I don't think the authors have carefully considered my comments. 

Firstly, the related work is also ignored. From the references, there is only one paper from 2021, and zero from 2022. Most of them are very old. Image matching is an important task for computer vision, and there are many good papers.

1. Feature Matching via Motion-Consistency Driven Probabilistic Graphical Model, International Journal of Computer Vision (IJCV), 2022, 130 (9), 2249-2264

2. Locality preserving matching. International Journal of Computer Vision, 127(5), 512–531

3. Image matching from handcrafted to deep features: A survey. International Journal of Computer Vision, 129(1), 23–79.

 4.Gms: Grid-based motion statistics for fast, ultra-robust feature, International Journal of Computer Vision 128 (2020) 1580–1593.

 5. Common visual pattern discovery via spatially coherent correspondences, in: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

6. Rejecting mismatches by correspondence function, International Journal of Computer Vision

7. MSA-Net: Establishing Reliable Correspondences by Multi-Scale Attention Network, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (TIP), 2022

All of them are opensource. They are only a part of the papers about image matching.

Secondly, the experiments are also not convinced. The competing methods are also been ignored. Some public datasets, such as, VGG, DAISY, Retina and EVD, are not been mentioned.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript is suitable for publication.

Author Response

Thank you for your sincere comments!

Round 3

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have considered most of my comments. Still, most of related work are based on deep learning. So, if the authors can add more other references, it will be better. Here, we provide some suggestions (it is not neccessary):

Robust Feature Matching for Remote Sensing Image Registration via Guided Hyperplane Fitting, Guobao Xiao, Huan Luo, Kun Zeng, Leyi Wei and Jiayi Ma, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60, 1-14

Segmentation by Continuous Latent Semantic Analysis for Multi-structure Model Fitting, Guobao Xiao, Hanzi Wang, Jiayi Ma and David Suter

International Journal of Computer Vision, 2021, 129, 2034-2056

Mining consistent correspondences using co-occurrence statistics,Guobao Xiao, Shiping Wang, Han Wang and Jiayi Ma,

Pattern Recognition, 2021, 119, 108062

Superpixel-guided two-view deterministic geometric model fitting, Guobao Xiao, Hanzi Wang, Yan Yan, David Suter

International Journal of Computer Vision, 2019, 127 (4), 323-339

Back to TopTop