Next Article in Journal
Visual Secure Image Encryption Scheme Based on Compressed Sensing and Regional Energy
Previous Article in Journal
An Entropy-Based Approach to Measurement of Stock Market Depth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Time-Limited Codewords over Band-Limited Channels: Data Rates and the Dimension of the W-T Space
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Multi-Class Cost-Constrained Random Coding for Correlated Sources over the Multiple-Access Channel

Entropy 2021, 23(5), 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/e23050569
by Arezou Rezazadeh 1,*,†, Josep Font-Segura 2, Alfonso Martinez 2 and Albert Guillén i Fàbregas 2,3,4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Entropy 2021, 23(5), 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/e23050569
Submission received: 12 April 2021 / Revised: 30 April 2021 / Accepted: 1 May 2021 / Published: 3 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Finite-Length Information Theory)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The complex theoretical approach is well described and novel.

However:

(1) the need for the study is not strongly underlined in the introduction, nor the novelty

(2) beyond the authors papers, the references are at least 3 years old; 

(3) a conclusion section underlining the main achievements, limitations and future work is missing. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. I suggest the title of Figure 1 should be shortened. Reference should be made to Figure 1 in the text of the paper, and then it should be described what it shows, rather than doing so in the title of the figure.
  2. The title of Chapter 4 should be changed in accordance with the description of that part of the paper in the introduction.
  3. In “Table 2: Independent-sources md-iid optimal thresholds γ ? N and exponents E iN τ (γ ? N ) in (73) for assignments Ωj (66)–(69)”, on p. 17, the following should be corrected: “Table 2: Independent-sources md-iid optimal thresholds γ ? N and exponents E iN τ (γ ? N ) in (73) for assignments Ωj in (66)–(69)”.
  4. I believe that the paper lacks an exact conclusion and recommendations for further research.

    The paper deals with an interesting issue. It is well written and organized. The results are presented in a very systematic way.

    The paper can be published after entering the proposed corrections.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop