Next Article in Journal
The Possible Coupling of LNG Regasification Process with the TSA Method of Oxygen Separation from Atmospheric Air
Next Article in Special Issue
A Theoretical Perspective of the Photochemical Potential in the Spectral Performance of Photovoltaic Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Maximum Entropy Approach to Reliability of Multi-Component Systems with Non-Repairable or Repairable Components
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anisotropic Diffusion in Driven Convection Arrays
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sustainable Performance Evaluation: Evidence from Listed Chinese Mining Corporations

College of Economics and Management, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2021, 23(3), 349; https://doi.org/10.3390/e23030349
Submission received: 19 February 2021 / Revised: 12 March 2021 / Accepted: 12 March 2021 / Published: 15 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Entropy-based Methods in In and Out of Equilibrium Systems)

Abstract

Rapid industrial development has caused a series of environmental problems, which is not conducive to sustainable development of society as a whole. It is necessary to build a sustainable development evaluation system. Most of the existing literature has evaluated corporate sustainable performance from the economy, environment and society on the basis of triple bottom lines. Considering the research gap and the practice need, an evaluation system is established from four dimensions, referred to as economy, society, environment and responsibility management, and 29 indicators are designed to measure these four dimensions. Twenty seven listed Chinese mining corporations are selected as research samples, and the entropy-weight-based Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is applied to calculate indicators’ weights. Results show that the four dimensions of sustainable performance weights from high to low are society, environment, economy, and management process.
Keywords: social performance; environmental performance; economic performance; responsibility management; entropy-weight-based TOPSIS method social performance; environmental performance; economic performance; responsibility management; entropy-weight-based TOPSIS method

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, Y.; Men, J.; Li, M.; Li, X. Sustainable Performance Evaluation: Evidence from Listed Chinese Mining Corporations. Entropy 2021, 23, 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23030349

AMA Style

Ma Y, Men J, Li M, Li X. Sustainable Performance Evaluation: Evidence from Listed Chinese Mining Corporations. Entropy. 2021; 23(3):349. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23030349

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Yuan, Jingzhi Men, Mingyu Li, and Xiaoyan Li. 2021. "Sustainable Performance Evaluation: Evidence from Listed Chinese Mining Corporations" Entropy 23, no. 3: 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23030349

APA Style

Ma, Y., Men, J., Li, M., & Li, X. (2021). Sustainable Performance Evaluation: Evidence from Listed Chinese Mining Corporations. Entropy, 23(3), 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23030349

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop