Next Article in Journal
Statistical Characteristics of Stationary Flow of Substance in a Network Channel Containing Arbitrary Number of Arms
Next Article in Special Issue
Polygenic Adaptation in a Population of Finite Size
Previous Article in Journal
Re-Thinking the World with Neutral Monism:Removing the Boundaries Between Mind, Matter, and Spacetime

Modules or Mean-Fields?

Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (UCL), London WC1N 3AR, UK
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2020, 22(5), 552;
Received: 1 April 2020 / Revised: 3 May 2020 / Accepted: 12 May 2020 / Published: 14 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Statistical Physics of Living Systems)
The segregation of neural processing into distinct streams has been interpreted by some as evidence in favour of a modular view of brain function. This implies a set of specialised ‘modules’, each of which performs a specific kind of computation in isolation of other brain systems, before sharing the result of this operation with other modules. In light of a modern understanding of stochastic non-equilibrium systems, like the brain, a simpler and more parsimonious explanation presents itself. Formulating the evolution of a non-equilibrium steady state system in terms of its density dynamics reveals that such systems appear on average to perform a gradient ascent on their steady state density. If this steady state implies a sufficiently sparse conditional independency structure, this endorses a mean-field dynamical formulation. This decomposes the density over all states in a system into the product of marginal probabilities for those states. This factorisation lends the system a modular appearance, in the sense that we can interpret the dynamics of each factor independently. However, the argument here is that it is factorisation, as opposed to modularisation, that gives rise to the functional anatomy of the brain or, indeed, any sentient system. In the following, we briefly overview mean-field theory and its applications to stochastic dynamical systems. We then unpack the consequences of this factorisation through simple numerical simulations and highlight the implications for neuronal message passing and the computational architecture of sentience. View Full-Text
Keywords: stochastic dynamics; modularity; density dynamics; message passing; Bayesian mechanics stochastic dynamics; modularity; density dynamics; message passing; Bayesian mechanics
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Parr, T.; Sajid, N.; Friston, K.J. Modules or Mean-Fields? Entropy 2020, 22, 552.

AMA Style

Parr T, Sajid N, Friston KJ. Modules or Mean-Fields? Entropy. 2020; 22(5):552.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parr, Thomas; Sajid, Noor; Friston, Karl J. 2020. "Modules or Mean-Fields?" Entropy 22, no. 5: 552.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop