Stochastic Entropy Solutions for Stochastic Scalar Balance Laws

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an interesting contribution with new and correct results.

Correct the style.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer:

Thank you very much for your affirmation. On the basis of your comments, we read the full text carefully again and made some adjustments for the style. Firstly, we use 'Corollary 2', 'Corollary 3' and 'Corollary 4' instead of 'Proposition 1', 'Proposition 2' and 'Proposition 3' on pages 6-7, respectively. Secondly, the formulations are renumbered consecutively (from (1) to (86)). Thirdly, after 'Authors' contributions', we add a new part 'Acknowledgments' on page 27.

Moreover, we use a professional English editing service to check the English editing for the previous manuscript, and correct many mistakes in the revised version, and all changes has been highlighted.

We hope this version is suitable for "Entropy". If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely Yours,

Rongrong Tian

Reviewer 2 Report

The proposed model and the mathematics used in the article seem correct and of interest to the readers.

I recommend a revision focusing on adding comments on the novelty and some key points of contribution of the article. 

Some other related recommended applications could also be added as well as a section with conclusions.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer:

We are sorry for the unclear statement of the novelty and some key points of contribution of the article in the previous manuscript. Thank you for your comments. In the revised version, we add a new section '6. Conclusions' to state the novelty and the key point of the contribution of the present article. Moreover, we use a professional English editing service to check the English editing for the previous manuscript, and correct many mistakes in the revised version, and all changes has been highlighted.

We hope this version is suitable for "Entropy". If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely Yours,

Rongrong Tian

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have revised their article properly, and I recommend it for publication