Next Article in Journal
Optimal Design of ORC Systems with a Low-Temperature Heat Source
Next Article in Special Issue
Bumps on the Road to Here (from Eternity)
Previous Article in Journal
Filter-Type Variable Selection Based on Information Measures for Regression Tasks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Classical and Quantum Models in Non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics: Moment Methods and Long-Time Approximations
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Entropy 2012, 14(2), 344-369;

Interventionism in Statistical Mechanics

Department of Philosophy, University of Wisconsin, Curtin Hall, 3243 N. Downer Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA
Received: 13 January 2012 / Revised: 9 February 2012 / Accepted: 9 February 2012 / Published: 17 February 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Arrow of Time)
Full-Text   |   PDF [135 KB, uploaded 24 February 2015]


I defend the idea that the fact that no system is entirely isolated (“Interventionism”) can be used to explain the successful use of the microcanonical distribution in statistical mechanics. The argument turns on claims about what is needed for an adequate explanation of this fact: I argue in particular that various competing explanations do not meet reasonable conditions of adequacy, and that the most striking lacuna in Interventionism—its failure to explain the “arrow of time”—is no real defect. View Full-Text
Keywords: interventionism; Albert; arrow of time interventionism; Albert; arrow of time
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Leeds, S. Interventionism in Statistical Mechanics. Entropy 2012, 14, 344-369.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Entropy EISSN 1099-4300 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top