How Does Short Video Advertisement Congruence Drive Sales? The Underlying Mechanism of Sociability
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Short Video Advertisements (SVAs)
2.2. Congruence
2.3. Signaling Theory
3. Hypotheses Development
3.1. Video-Video (V-V) Title Congruence and Sociability
3.2. Video-Product (V-P) Title Congruence and Sociability
3.3. Sociability and Sale Performance
3.4. Moderation Effect of Creation Frequency
3.5. Moderation Effect of Product Brand
4. Research Methodology
4.1. Data Source
4.2. Variable Measurements
5. Model Specific and Research Results
5.1. Empirical Results
5.1.1. Main Result
5.1.2. Moderation Effect
5.2. Robust Tests
5.2.1. Heckman Two-Stage Test
5.2.2. Alternative Measurement of V-V Title Congruence
5.2.3. Alternative Measurement of Sociability
5.3. Additional Analysis
6. Discussion
6.1. Key Findings
6.2. Theoretical Contribution
6.3. Practical Implications
6.4. Limitations and Future Work
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Robustness Results for Heckman Two-Stage Test
| Variables | Selection Model |
|---|---|
| Propensity to Post Short Video Advertise | |
| Creator fans | −0.729 *** |
| Creator expertise | 0.258 *** |
| Video viewership | −0.194 *** |
| Video likes | −0.175 *** |
| Video comments | −0.200 *** |
| Video shares | 0.157 *** |
| Video length | 0.125 *** |
| Video age | 0.068 *** |
| Video day of week | −0.015 |
| Video time of day | 0.001 |
| Video title length | 0.097 *** |
| Video tag number | 0.414 *** |
| Month fixed effect | Yes |
| Creator fixed effect | Yes |
| Sector fixed effect | Yes |
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 | Model 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sale | Sociability | Sale | Sale | Sale | Sociability | Sale | Sale | |
| V-V title congruence | 0.325 *** | 0.245 *** | 0.234 *** | −0.091 | ||||
| (0.056) | (0.014) | (0.056) | (0.071) | |||||
| V-P title congruence | −0.166 ** | −0.059 *** | −0.144 ** | −0.835 *** | ||||
| (0.069) | (0.016) | (0.069) | (0.093) | |||||
| Sociability | 0.372 *** | 0.377 *** | ||||||
| (0.018) | (0.018) | |||||||
| Creation frequency | −0.306 *** | 0.265 *** | ||||||
| (0.058) | (0.068) | |||||||
| Creation frequency × V-V title congruence | 0.252 *** | |||||||
| (0.076) | ||||||||
| Creation frequency × V-P title congruence | −0.624 *** | |||||||
| (0.090) | ||||||||
| Product brand | 1.327 *** | 1.018 *** | ||||||
| (0.055) | (0.083) | |||||||
| Product brand × V-V title congruence | 0.707 *** | |||||||
| (0.083) | ||||||||
| Product brand × V-P title congruence | 1.039 *** | |||||||
| (0.115) | ||||||||
| Video day of week | 0.037 * | −0.014 ** | 0.042 * | 0.031 | 0.037 * | −0.013** | 0.042 * | 0.035 |
| (0.023) | (0.005) | (0.022) | (0.022) | (0.023) | (0.005) | (0.022) | (0.022) | |
| Video time of day | −0.018 | 0.079 *** | −0.047 ** | −0.024 | −0.020 | 0.078 *** | −0.049 ** | −0.034 |
| (0.024) | (0.006) | (0.024) | (0.023) | (0.024) | (0.006) | (0.024) | (0.023) | |
| Video length | 0.659 *** | 0.614 *** | 0.431 *** | 0.483 *** | 0.662 *** | 0.618 *** | 0.428 *** | 0.492 *** |
| (0.064) | (0.017) | (0.065) | (0.061) | (0.064) | (0.017) | (0.065) | (0.061) | |
| Video age | 0.239 *** | 0.135 *** | 0.189 *** | 0.245 *** | 0.240 *** | 0.136 *** | 0.189 *** | 0.246 *** |
| (0.017) | (0.004) | (0.017) | (0.016) | (0.017) | (0.004) | (0.017) | (0.016) | |
| Video title length | 0.130 *** | 0.205 *** | 0.054 ** | 0.124 *** | 0.160 *** | 0.224 *** | 0.075 *** | 0.171 *** |
| (0.027) | (0.008) | (0.027) | (0.027) | (0.027) | (0.008) | (0.027) | (0.026) | |
| Video tag number | 0.237 *** | 0.837 *** | −0.074 * | 0.224 *** | 0.248 *** | 0.844 *** | −0.070 * | 0.236 *** |
| (0.038) | (0.010) | (0.040) | (0.036) | (0.038) | (0.011) | (0.040) | (0.036) | |
| Product price | −0.979 *** | −0.025 *** | −0.970 *** | −0.993 *** | −0.980 *** | −0.025 *** | −0.971 *** | −0.990 *** |
| (0.020) | (0.004) | (0.020) | (0.019) | (0.020) | (0.004) | (0.020) | (0.019) | |
| Creator fans | −0.039 | −1.464 *** | 0.506 *** | −0.535 *** | −0.026 | −1.474 *** | 0.530 *** | −0.390 ** |
| (0.195) | (0.050) | (0.196) | (0.190) | (0.196) | (0.051) | (0.196) | (0.190) | |
| Creator expertise | 0.001 | 0.528 *** | −0.195 *** | 0.030 | −0.008 | 0.522 *** | −0.205 *** | 0.025 |
| (0.027) | (0.008) | (0.028) | (0.027) | (0.027) | (0.008) | (0.028) | (0.027) | |
| Creator sex | 2.901 *** | 9.008 *** | −0.449 | 4.966 *** | 2.657 *** | 8.858 *** | −0.684 | 4.619 *** |
| (0.444) | (0.106) | (0.467) | (0.448) | (0.445) | (0.106) | (0.466) | (0.443) | |
| IMR | 0.977 *** | 4.303 *** | −0.623 *** | 0.951 *** | 0.985 *** | 4.310 *** | −0.641 *** | 0.971 *** |
| (0.059) | (0.023) | (0.094) | (0.057) | (0.059) | (0.023) | (0.093) | (0.057) | |
| Month fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Creator fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sector fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | 8.635 *** | 12.267 *** | 4.073 | 12.609 *** | 8.685 *** | 12.508 *** | 3.967 | 10.946 *** |
| (2.515) | (0.638) | (2.507) | (2.458) | (2.522) | (0.641) | (2.515) | (2.457) | |
| N | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 |
| R2 | 0.551 | 0.905 | 0.555 | 0.581 | 0.551 | 0.905 | 0.555 | 0.581 |
| adj. R2 | 0.549 | 0.905 | 0.552 | 0.578 | 0.549 | 0.904 | 0.552 | 0.579 |
Appendix B. Robustness Results for Alternative Measurement of V-V Title Congruence
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 | Model 8 | Model 9 | Model 10 | Model 11 | Model 12 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sale | Sociability | Sale | Sale | Sale | Sociability | Sale | Sale | Sale | Sociability | Sale | Sale | |
| V-V title congruence (7) | 0.208 *** | 0.329 *** | 0.115 ** | −0.155 ** | ||||||||
| (0.049) | (0.020) | (0.049) | (0.063) | |||||||||
| V-V title congruence (21) | 0.449 *** | 0.432 *** | 0.329 *** | −0.075 | ||||||||
| (0.061) | (0.024) | (0.061) | (0.075) | |||||||||
| V-V title congruence (28) | 0.536 *** | 0.490 *** | 0.399 *** | 0.006 | ||||||||
| (0.065) | (0.026) | (0.065) | (0.079) | |||||||||
| Sociability | 0.283 *** | 0.280 *** | 0.279 *** | |||||||||
| (0.011) | (0.011) | (0.011) | ||||||||||
| Creation frequency | −0.277 *** | −0.318 *** | −0.390 *** | |||||||||
| (0.044) | (0.046) | (0.046) | ||||||||||
| Creation frequency × V-V title congruence (7) | 0.160 *** | |||||||||||
| (0.054) | ||||||||||||
| Creation frequency × V-V title congruence (21) | 0.238 *** | |||||||||||
| (0.061) | ||||||||||||
| Creation frequency × V-V title congruence (28) | 0.361 *** | |||||||||||
| (0.063) | ||||||||||||
| Product brand | 1.362 *** | 1.269 *** | 1.266 *** | |||||||||
| (0.055) | (0.056) | (0.056) | ||||||||||
| Product brand × V-V title congruence (7) | 0.596 *** | |||||||||||
| (0.077) | ||||||||||||
| Product brand × V-V title congruence (21) | 0.835 *** | |||||||||||
| (0.087) | ||||||||||||
| Product brand × V-V title congruence (28) | 0.860 *** | |||||||||||
| (0.090) | ||||||||||||
| Video day of week | 0.035 | −0.022 ** | 0.042 * | 0.031 | 0.034 | −0.023 ** | 0.041 * | 0.031 | 0.036 | −0.022 ** | 0.042 * | 0.032 |
| (0.023) | (0.009) | (0.022) | (0.022) | (0.023) | (0.009) | (0.022) | (0.022) | (0.023) | (0.009) | (0.022) | (0.022) | |
| Video time of day | −0.030 | 0.028 *** | −0.038 | −0.034 | −0.029 | 0.028 *** | −0.037 | −0.034 | −0.030 | 0.027 *** | −0.038 | −0.034 |
| (0.024) | (0.010) | (0.024) | (0.023) | (0.024) | (0.010) | (0.024) | (0.023) | (0.024) | (0.010) | (0.024) | (0.023) | |
| Video length | 0.707 *** | 0.801 *** | 0.476 *** | 0.521 *** | 0.704 *** | 0.804 *** | 0.475 *** | 0.523 *** | 0.702 *** | 0.803 *** | 0.475 *** | 0.522 *** |
| (0.064) | (0.030) | (0.064) | (0.062) | (0.064) | (0.030) | (0.064) | (0.061) | (0.064) | (0.030) | (0.064) | (0.061) | |
| Video age | 0.227 *** | 0.084 *** | 0.203 *** | 0.232 *** | 0.230 *** | 0.088 *** | 0.205 *** | 0.235 *** | 0.228 *** | 0.086 *** | 0.204 *** | 0.234 *** |
| (0.017) | (0.006) | (0.017) | (0.016) | (0.017) | (0.006) | (0.017) | (0.016) | (0.017) | (0.006) | (0.017) | (0.016) | |
| Video title length | 0.100 *** | 0.031 *** | 0.091 *** | 0.095 *** | 0.084 *** | 0.023 ** | 0.077 *** | 0.084 *** | 0.077 *** | 0.017 | 0.071 *** | 0.074 *** |
| (0.027) | (0.012) | (0.027) | (0.026) | (0.027) | (0.012) | (0.027) | (0.027) | (0.027) | (0.012) | (0.027) | (0.027) | |
| Video tag number | 0.063 * | 0.065 *** | 0.045 | 0.056 | 0.060 * | 0.063 *** | 0.043 | 0.051 | 0.059 | 0.062 *** | 0.042 | 0.052 |
| (0.036) | (0.015) | (0.036) | (0.035) | (0.036) | (0.015) | (0.036) | (0.035) | (0.036) | (0.015) | (0.036) | (0.035) | |
| Product price | −0.986 *** | −0.970 *** | −0.999 *** | −0.985 *** | −0.970 *** | −1.000 *** | −0.986 *** | −0.971 *** | −1.000 *** | |||
| (0.020) | (0.020) | (0.019) | (0.020) | (0.020) | (0.019) | (0.020) | (0.020) | (0.019) | ||||
| Creator fans | 0.274 | −0.085 | 0.293 | −0.197 | 0.275 | −0.101 | 0.297 | −0.207 | 0.280 | −0.098 | 0.301 | −0.214 |
| (0.195) | (0.090) | (0.194) | (0.189) | (0.195) | (0.090) | (0.194) | (0.189) | (0.195) | (0.090) | (0.194) | (0.189) | |
| Creator expertise | −0.175 *** | −0.200 *** | −0.118 *** | −0.125 *** | −0.169 *** | −0.199 *** | −0.113 *** | −0.121 *** | −0.169 *** | −0.199 *** | −0.113 *** | −0.122 *** |
| (0.026) | (0.011) | (0.026) | (0.026) | (0.026) | (0.011) | (0.026) | (0.026) | (0.026) | (0.011) | (0.026) | (0.026) | |
| Creator sex | 1.909 *** | 5.168 *** | 0.485 | 3.996 *** | 2.050 *** | 5.241 *** | 0.620 | 4.138 *** | 2.070 *** | 5.249 *** | 0.644 | 4.091 *** |
| (0.442) | (0.171) | (0.443) | (0.444) | (0.442) | (0.171) | (0.444) | (0.446) | (0.443) | (0.171) | (0.444) | (0.445) | |
| Month fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Creator fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sector fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | 6.789 *** | 3.431 *** | 5.807 ** | 10.259 *** | 6.666 *** | 3.582 *** | 5.652 ** | 10.299 *** | 6.602 *** | 3.550 *** | 5.601 ** | 10.398 *** |
| (2.522) | (1.163) | (2.502) | (2.454) | (2.521) | (1.159) | (2.502) | (2.453) | (2.519) | (1.159) | (2.501) | (2.453) | |
| N | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 |
| R2 | 0.549 | 0.745 | 0.555 | 0.578 | 0.549 | 0.745 | 0.555 | 0.579 | 0.549 | 0.746 | 0.555 | 0.579 |
| adj. R2 | 0.546 | 0.743 | 0.552 | 0.576 | 0.547 | 0.744 | 0.552 | 0.576 | 0.547 | 0.744 | 0.552 | 0.576 |
Appendix C. Robustness Results for Alternative Measurement of Sociability
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sale | Sociability Ratio | Sale | Sale | Sociability Ratio | Sale | |
| V-V title congruence | 0.356 *** | 0.001 *** | 0.346 *** | |||
| (0.056) | (0.000) | (0.057) | ||||
| V-V title congruence | −0.201 *** | −0.000 *** | −0.199 *** | |||
| (0.069) | (0.000) | (0.069) | ||||
| Sociability ratio | 16.831 *** | 17.480 *** | ||||
| (4.520) | (4.637) | |||||
| Video day of week | 0.035 | −0.000 * | 0.036 | 0.035 | −0.000 | 0.037 |
| (0.023) | (0.000) | (0.023) | (0.023) | (0.000) | (0.023) | |
| Video time of day | −0.030 | −0.000 *** | −0.028 | −0.031 | −0.000 ** | −0.030 |
| (0.024) | (0.000) | (0.024) | (0.024) | (0.000) | (0.024) | |
| Video length | 0.706 *** | 0.001 *** | 0.682 *** | 0.709 *** | 0.003 *** | 0.683 *** |
| (0.064) | (0.000) | (0.064) | (0.064) | (0.000) | (0.064) | |
| Video age | 0.228 *** | 0.000 *** | 0.227 *** | 0.229 *** | 0.000 *** | 0.227 *** |
| (0.017) | (0.000) | (0.017) | (0.017) | (0.000) | (0.017) | |
| Video title length | 0.090 *** | 0.000 | 0.090 *** | 0.123 *** | 0.000 | 0.122 *** |
| (0.027) | (0.000) | (0.027) | (0.027) | (0.000) | (0.027) | |
| Video tag number | 0.061 * | −0.000 | 0.062 * | 0.073 ** | 0.000 | 0.073 ** |
| (0.036) | (0.000) | (0.036) | (0.036) | (0.000) | (0.036) | |
| Product price | −0.986 *** | −0.984 *** | −0.988 *** | −0.986 *** | ||
| (0.020) | (0.020) | (0.020) | (0.020) | |||
| Creator fans | 0.282 | −0.004 *** | 0.342 * | 0.304 | −0.000 *** | 0.367 * |
| (0.195) | (0.001) | (0.197) | (0.196) | (0.000) | (0.198) | |
| Creator expertise | −0.171 *** | −0.000 ** | −0.169 *** | −0.183 *** | −0.000 *** | −0.180 *** |
| (0.026) | (0.000) | (0.026) | (0.026) | (0.000) | (0.026) | |
| Creator sex | 1.995 *** | 0.006 *** | 1.893 *** | 1.710 *** | 0.000 | 1.610 *** |
| (0.442) | (0.001) | (0.443) | (0.442) | (0.000) | (0.444) | |
| Month fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Creator fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sector fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | 6.635 *** | 0.046 *** | 5.857 ** | 6.612 *** | 0.004 *** | 5.795 ** |
| (2.522) | (0.007) | (2.536) | (2.530) | (0.000) | (2.544) | |
| N | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 |
| R2 | 0.549 | 0.309 | 0.549 | 0.549 | 0.078 | 0.549 |
| adj. R2 | 0.546 | 0.305 | 0.547 | 0.546 | 0.077 | 0.546 |
Appendix D. Measurements of Sentiment, First-Person Pronoun, and Vividness
References
- Meng, L.; Kou, S.; Duan, S.; Bie, Y. The impact of content characteristics of short-form video ads on consumer purchase behavior: Evidence from TikTok. J. Bus. Res. 2024, 183, 114874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, C.; Ling, S.; Cho, D.; Kim, Y. How social presence influences engagement in short video-embedded advertisements: The serial mediation effect of flow experience and advertising avoidance. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2024, 19, 705–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, X.; Liu, H.; Xi, N.; Liao, J.; Yang, Z. Short video marketing: What, when and how short-branded videos facilitate consumer engagement. Internet Res. 2023, 34, 1104–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swani, K.; Milne, G.R.; Brown, B.P.; Assaf, A.G.; Donthu, N. What messages to post? Evaluating the popularity of social media communications in business versus consumer markets. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2017, 62, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Addo, P.C.; Fang, J.; Asare, A.O.; Kulbo, N.B. Customer engagement and purchase intention in live-streaming digital marketing platforms. Serv. Ind. J. 2021, 41, 767–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Addo, P.C.; Akpatsa, S.K.; Nukpe, P.; Ohemeng, A.A.; Kulbo, N.B. Digital analytics approach to understanding short video advertising in digital marketing. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2022, 30, 405–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, T.; Turban, E. Introduction to the special issue social commerce: A research framework for social commerce. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2011, 16, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, K.; Lu, J.; Guo, L.; Li, W. The dynamic effect of interactivity on customer engagement behavior through tie strength: Evidence from live streaming commerce platforms. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 56, 102251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z. Analysis on the “Douyin (TikTok) mania” phenomenon based on recommendation algorithms. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 235, 03029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Song, M.; Jiang, Y.; Li, Q. Sonic strategies: Unveiling the impact of sound features in short video ads on enterprise market entry performance. J. Bus. Bus. Mark. 2024, 32, 95–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, X.; Li, J.; Wang, Q. The dark side of recommendation algorithms in Chinese mass short video apps: Effect of perceived over-recommendation on users’ cognitive dissonance and discontinuance intention. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Int. 2024, 41, 6701–6715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y. Douyin platform’s short-video content homogenization: An analysis of innovation dilemmas based on coordination games. HBEM 2025, 60, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, J.; Sui, Y.; Zhou, X.; Li, G. Effect of short video ads on sales through social media: The role of advertisement content generators. Int. J. Advert. 2021, 40, 870–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, G.; Chung, Y.; Peng, L.; Wang, Q. Clicks for money: Predicting video views through a sentiment analysis of titles and thumbnails. J. Bus. Res. 2024, 183, 114849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, S.-H.; Kim, H.-W. What content and context factors lead to selection of a video clip? The heuristic route perspective. Electron. Commer. Res. 2019, 19, 603–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Y.; Rui, J.R.; Yu, N. How parasocial relationship and influencer-product congruence shape audience’s attitude towards product placement in online videos: The mediation role of reactance. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2023, 16, 1315–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, X.; Wang, J. How short video marketing influences purchase intention in social commerce: The role of users’ persona perception, shared values, and individual-level factors. Hum. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024, 11, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haq, M.D.U.; Chiu, C.-M. Boosting online user engagement with short video endorsement content on TikTok via the image transfer mechanism. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2024, 64, 101379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, K.; Nusair, K.; Junaid, M.; Aman, W. A two-actor model for understanding user engagement with content creators: Applying social capital theory. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2024, 156, 108237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, J.; Chen, J. The authenticity advantage: How influencer authenticity management strategies shape digital engagement with sponsored videos. J. Bus. Res. 2024, 185, 114937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Chen, W.; Ow, T.T. The effects of social media posts’ characteristics on customer engagement: Evidence from Wechat. Inf. Manag. 2023, 60, 103854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellis-Chadwick, F.; Chaffey, D. Digital Marketing: Strategy, Implementation and Practice; Pearson: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Kaye, D.B.V.; Chen, X.; Zeng, J. The co-evolution of two Chinese mobile short video apps: Parallel platformization of Douyin and TikTok. Mob. Media Commun. 2020, 9, 229–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, L.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. Exploring the factors influencing consumer engagement behavior regarding short-form video advertising: A big data perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 70, 103170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koh, B.; Cui, F. An exploration of the relation between the visual attributes of thumbnails and the view-through of videos: The case of branded video content. Decis. Support Syst. 2022, 160, 113820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H. Title Matters: Impacts of Titles on User Engagement in Short Video Platforms. Ph.D. Thesis, Singapore Management University, Singapore, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Hilvert-Bruce, Z.; Neill, J.; Sjöblom, M.; Hamari, J. Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on twitch. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 84, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olson, E.L.; Thjømøe, H.M. Explaining and articulating the fit construct in sponsorship. J. Advert. 2011, 40, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osgood, C.E.; Tannenbaum, P.H. The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychol. Rev. 1955, 62, 42–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.Y.; Kim, H.-Y. Influencer advertising on social media: The multiple inference model on influencer-product congruence and sponsorship disclosure. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 130, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eslami, S.P.; Ghasemaghaei, M. Effects of online review positiveness and review score inconsistency on sales: A comparison by product involvement. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 45, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rungruangjit, W. What drives Taobao live streaming commerce? The role of parasocial relationships, congruence and source credibility in Chinese consumers’ purchase intentions. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, H.; Lin, L. The effects of match-ups on the consumer attitudes toward internet celebrities and their live streaming contents in the context of product endorsement. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 52, 101934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maier, E. The negative effect of product image inconsistency on product overviews during the online product search. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2019, 23, 110–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belanche, D.; Casaló, L.V.; Flavián, M.; Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. Understanding influencer marketing: The role of congruence between influencers, products and consumers. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 132, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spence, M. Job market signaling. Q. J. Econ. 1973, 87, 355–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, H.S.; Ko, M.S.; Medlin, D.; Chen, C. The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic quality cues of digital video games on sales: An empirical investigation. Decis. Support Syst. 2018, 106, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Li, X. What drives online course sales? Signaling effects of user-generated information in the paid knowledge market. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 118, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, S.; Wu, Y.; Du, Q.; Li, C.; Fan, W. The secret of voice: How acoustic characteristics affect video creators’ performance on bilibili. Decis. Support Syst. 2024, 179, 114167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, M.; Gijsenberg, M.J. Consistency and commonality in advertising content: Helping or hurting? Int. J. Res. Mark. 2023, 40, 128–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, M.; Islam, T.; Rehman, S.U. What you see is what you get: Assessing in-game advertising effectiveness. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2022, 17, 527–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, S.; Kozinets, R.V.; Sherry, J.F. Teaching old brands new tricks: Retro branding and the revival of brand meaning. J. Mark. 2003, 67, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danaher, P.J.; Bonfrer, A.; Dhar, S. The effect of competitive advertising interference on sales for packaged goods. J. Mark. Res. 2008, 45, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Germelmann, C.C.; Herrmann, J.-L.; Kacha, M.; Darke, P.R. Congruence and incongruence in thematic advertisement–medium combinations: Role of awareness, fluency, and persuasion knowledge. J. Advert. 2020, 49, 141–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fransen, M.L.; Fennis, B.M.; Pruyn, A.T.H. Matching communication modalities: The effects of modality congruence and processing style on brand evaluation and brand choice. Commun. Res. 2010, 37, 576–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duke, D.; Fiacconi, C.M.; Kohler, S. Parallel effects of processing fluency and positive affect on familiarity-based recognition decisions for faces. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jacoby, L.L. Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 1983, 22, 485–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petty, R.E.; Cacioppo, J.T. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1986; Volume 19, pp. 123–205. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, A.Y.; Labroo, A.A. The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. J. Mark. Res. 2004, 41, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Ariffin, S.K. Keep scrolling: An investigation of short video users’ continuous watching behavior. Inf. Manag. 2024, 61, 104014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elpers, J.W.; Wedel, M.; Pieters, R. Why do consumers stop viewing television commercials? Two experiments on the influence of moment-to-moment entertainment and information value. J. Mark. Res. 2003, 40, 437–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, B.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, X.; Xue, T. Understanding the influence mechanism of advertising avoidance from an s-o-r perspective: An empirical study based on “Qiafan” videos of Bilibili. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2024, 64, 101377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simola, J.; Kuisma, J.; Kaakinen, J.K. Attention, memory and preference for direct and indirect print advertisements. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 111, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radach, R.; Lemmer, S.; Vorstius, C.; Heller, D.; Radach, K. Chapter 27-Eye movements in the processing of print advertisements. In The Mind’s Eye; Hyönä, J., Radach, R., Deubel, H., Eds.; North-Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 609–632. [Google Scholar]
- Fu, W.W.; Sim, C.C. Aggregate bandwagon effect on online videos’ viewership: Value uncertainty, popularity cues, and heuristics. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2011, 62, 2382–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leibenstein, H. Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand. Q. J. Econ. 1950, 64, 183–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Yan, Y.; Smith, A.N. What drives digital engagement with sponsored videos? An investigation of video influencers’ authenticity management strategies. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2022, 51, 198–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kronrod, A.; Huber, J. Ad wearout wearout: How time can reverse the negative effect of frequent advertising repetition on brand preference. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2019, 36, 306–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Küper, A.; Krämer, N.C. Influencing factors for building social capital on live streaming websites. Entertain. Comput. 2021, 39, 100444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zajonc, R.B. Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Curr. Dir. Psychol. 2016, 10, 224–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.; Lustria, M.L.; Burke, D.; Kwon, N. Predictors of cancer information overload: Findings from a national survey. Inf. Res. 2007, 12, 326. [Google Scholar]
- Swar, B.; Hameed, T.; Reychav, I. Information overload, psychological ill-being, and behavioral intention to continue online healthcare information search. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 70, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cambier, F.; Poncin, I. Inferring brand integrity from marketing communications: The effects of brand transparency signals in a consumer empowerment context. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 109, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Upadhyay, Y.; Tripathi, A. Brand wagon effect: How brand equity eclipses the effect of eWoM on purchase intentions–Mediating role of review helpfulness. J. Bus. Res. 2023, 168, 114239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho-Dac, N.N.; Carson, S.J.; Moore, W.L. The effects of positive and negative online customer reviews: Do brand strength and category maturity matter? J. Mark. 2013, 77, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozdemir, S.; Zhang, S.; Gupta, S.; Bebek, G. The effects of trust and peer influence on corporate brand—Consumer relationships and consumer loyalty. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 791–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akerlof, G.A. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. In Uncertainty in Economics; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1978; pp. 235–251. [Google Scholar]
- Douyin. Douyin Data Report of 2024. Available online: https://www.douyin.com/search/2024%E6%8A%96%E9%9F%B3%E6%9C%80%E6%96%B0%E6%9C%88%E6%B4%BB%E5%AE%98%E6%96%B9%E6%95%B0%E6%8D%AE?modal_id=7423270716881128767&type=general (accessed on 25 June 2025).
- Yuan, L.; Xia, H.; Ye, Q. The effect of advertising strategies on a short video platform: Evidence from TikTok. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 2022, 122, 1956–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bian, R.; Zhu, M. The relationship between ritual, personal involvement and travel intention: A study of check-in-travel on Douyin. Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manag. 2020, 10, 451–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, H.; Liu, L.; Liao, M.; Fang, J. A comprehensive overview of micro-influencer marketing: Decoding the current landscape, impacts, and trends. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowley, J.; Sbaffi, L. Academics’ attitudes towards peer review in scholarly journals and the effect of role and discipline. J. Inf. Sci. 2017, 44, 644–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chanmama. Douyin E-Commerce Annual Report on 2023. Available online: https://chanmama.com/school/reportDown/127.html (accessed on 22 April 2024).
- Zhou, M.; Huang, J.; Wu, K.; Huang, X.; Kong, N.; Campy, K.S. Characterizing Chinese consumers’ intention to use live e-commerce shopping. Technol. Soc. 2021, 67, 101767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, P.; Liu, Z.; Li, X.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, M.X. The influences of livestreaming on online purchase intention: Examining platform characteristics and consumer psychology. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 2023, 123, 862–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boom, C.D.; Canneyt, S.V.; Demeester, T.; Dhoedt, B. Representation learning for very short texts using weighted word embedding aggregation. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2016, 80, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhukova, A.; von Sperl, L.; Matt, C.E.; Gipp, B. Generative user-experience research for developing domain-specific natural language processing applications. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 2024, 66, 7859–7889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Yang, S.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yao, J.; Qazi, A. Does the review deserve more helpfulness when its title resembles the content? Locating helpful reviews by text mining. Inf. Process. Manag. 2020, 57, 102179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, C.; Yang, S.-U. Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relat. Rev. 2017, 43, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yeoh, W.; Qi, C.; Jiang, H. Exploring the interaction between streaming modes and product types in e-commerce sales. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 20, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baron, R.M.; Kenny, D.A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, W.; Chen, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhou, S.; Jiang, H.; Wei, J. Personalized managerial response and negative inconsistent review helpfulness: The mediating effect of perceived response helpfulness. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 74, 103398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, R.; Lu, Y.; Ma, J.; Wang, W. Examining gifting behavior on live streaming platforms: An identity-based motivation model. Inf. Manag. 2021, 58, 103406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Syrdal, H.A.; Myers, S.; Sen, S.; Woodroof, P.J.; McDowell, W.C. Influencer marketing and the growth of affiliates: The effects of language features on engagement behavior. J. Bus. Res. 2023, 163, 113875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unsloth, A.I.; Han, D.; Han, M. Unsloth. Github. 2025. Available online: http://github.com/unslothai/unsloth (accessed on 25 June 2025).
- Chang, S.-T.; Wu, J.-J. A content-based metric for social media influencer marketing. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2023, 124, 344–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chew, R.; Bollenbacher, J.; Wenger, M.; Speer, J.; Kim, A. LLM-assisted content analysis: Using large language models to support deductive coding. arXiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Kim, H.-j.; Do, B.; Choi, J. The effect of emotion in thumbnails and titles of video clips on pre-roll advertising effectiveness. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 151, 232–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Packard, G.; Moore, S.G.; McFerran, B. (I’m) happy to help (you): The impact of personal pronoun use in customer-firm interactions. J. Mark. Res. 2018, 55, 541–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Zhou, S.; Jin, W.; Chen, S. Investigating the determinants of medical crowdfunding performance: A signaling theory perspective. Internet Res. 2022, 33, 1134–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stern, B.B. Who talks advertising? Literary theory and narrative “point of view”. J. Advert. 1991, 20, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L. Most significant impact on consumer engagement: An analytical framework for the multimodal content of short video advertisements. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 20, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albert, N.; Ambroise, L.; Valette-Florence, P. Consumer, brand, celebrity: Which congruency produces effective celebrity endorsements? J. Bus. Res. 2017, 81, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, C.; Hasan, N.A.M.; Zamri Bin Ahmad, A.M.; Lei, G. Influence of short video content on consumers purchase intentions on social media platforms with trust as a mediator. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 16605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dang, A.; Saravade, S.; Spradlin, J.; Nworah, P.; Linstead, A.; Munger, R. Should brands utilize trending content elements for their short-form advertisements? Mark. Manag. J. 2025, 35, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Dongqi, S. How are brands associated by users in short videos-a study on the mechanism of user associations with brand placements in short videos based on signal theory. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0316905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, H.S.; Ayaburi, E.W. Effect of corporate reputation and coopetitive branding strategy on digital products sales: Evidence from digital video game industry. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2026, 86, 102975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Z.; Dong, Q. HowNet-a hybrid language and knowledge resource. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering, Beijing, China, 26–29 October 2003; pp. 820–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Research | Research Context | Theory | DV | IV | Moderator (mo) /Mediator (me) | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Addo, Akpatsa [6] | JD, Tmall and Taobao | Signaling theory | Product sale | Short video ads (binary variable) | Price (mo)/product quality signal and consumer satisfaction (me) | The use of short video advertisements will promote product sales; the positive relationship is mediated by product quality signal and consumer satisfaction. |
| Dong, Liu [3] | Weibo short video | - | Consumer social engagement behavior (likes, comment, and share). | Video content features (content matching, information relevance, storytelling and emotionality) | Video release time (mo) | Short video content features significantly affect consumer engagement, compared to videos released in the afternoon, videos released in the morning increase the positive effects of warmth, excitement, and joy on consumer engagement. |
| Xiao, Li [24] | TikTok | Uses and gratifications theory, signaling theory | Consumer engagement | Performance expectancy; entertainment; tie strength; sales approach | Product type (mo) | Four key features of short videos (performance expectancy, entertainment, tie strength, and sales approach) significantly affect consumer engagement behavior, and product type moderates these relationships. |
| Meng, Kou [1] | TikTok | Grounded theory | Consumer purchase behavior | Trustworthiness, expertise, attractiveness, authenticity, and brand heritage | - | Trustworthiness, expertise, and attractiveness of video content can promote consumer purchase behavior, while authenticity and brand heritage have a U-shape effect on consumer purchase. |
| Yang, Wang [10] | Douyin | Heuristic-systematic model theory | Enterprise performance | Voice feature; music feature | - | When short video advertisements have a faster speech rate, high voice quality, faster music tempo, lower pitch, and lower loudness, enterprises achieve a more positive performance in social e-commerce. |
| Research | Research Context | Theory | DV | IV | Moderator (mo) /Mediator (me) | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eslami and Ghasemaghaei [31] | Amazon.com | Heuristic-systematic model | Product sale | Online review positiveness, review score inconsistency | Review score, review sentiment and review title sentiment (mo) | For a high-involvement product, review score incongruence negatively influences its sales, review textual sentiment positively influences its sales, and review title sentiment and review score influence low-involvement product sales. |
| Maier [34] | Online retail website | - | Attitudes towards the product assortment | In congruence of image characteristics on product overview | Disfluency perception of the product assortment | Product image incongruence in product overview negatively affects the assortment evaluations and choice satisfaction of the product. |
| Park and Lin [33] | Taobao and Weibo | Match-up hypothesis | Purchase intention | Self-product fit, source-product fit, live content-product fit | Perceived trustworthiness (me), attractiveness (me), attitude toward content (me) | Source-product fit positively affects the source trustworthiness and attractiveness, live content-product fit positively affects attitude towards content, and source trustworthiness, hedonic attitude, and self-product fit enhance the purchase intention. |
| Rungruangjit [32] | Taobao | Source credibility, match-up hypothesis and parasocial relationship theory | Purchase intention | Celebrity-product congruence | Source credibility (me) and parasocial relationship (me) | A good match-up between celebrity and product can enhance perceived source credibility, and perceived expertise positively mediates the positive effect of celebrity-product congruence on purchase intention. |
| Variable | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 315,185.900 | 1,156,790 | 0 | 51,100,000 |
| V-V title congruence | 0.605 | 0.295 | −0.277 | 1 |
| V-P title congruence | 0.660 | 0.223 | −0.408 | 1 |
| Sociability | 695.997 | 7332.278 | 0 | 1,186,097 |
| Creation frequency | 6.136 | 4.278 | 1 | 50 |
| Brand | 0.568 | 0.495 | 0 | 1 |
| Video day of week | 0.728 | 0.445 | 0 | 1 |
| Video time of day | 0.292 | 0.455 | 0 | 1 |
| Video length | 0.559 | 0.588 | 0 | 14.280 |
| Video age | 46.983 | 27.163 | 0 | 97 |
| Video title length | 42.639 | 20.119 | 0 | 462 |
| Video tag number | 2.556 | 1.574 | 0 | 10 |
| Product price | 80.952 | 363.585 | 0.060 | 22,888 |
| Creator fans | 1,001,553 | 1,476,317 | 100,000 | 52,200,000 |
| Creator expertise | 112.941 | 85.377 | 2 | 316 |
| Creator sex | 0.597 | 0.490 | 0 | 1 |
| Variable | VIF | 1/VIF | Variable | VIF | 1/VIF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V-V title congruence | 1.230 | 0.810 | Video age | 1.010 | 0.994 |
| V-P title congruence | 1.440 | 0.693 | Video title length | 1.310 | 0.764 |
| Sociability | 1.860 | 0.537 | Video tag number | 1.360 | 0.737 |
| Creation frequency | 2.160 | 0.464 | Product price | 1.090 | 0.918 |
| Brand | 1.050 | 0.952 | Creator fans | 1.230 | 0.814 |
| Video day of week | 1.000 | 0.996 | Creator expertise | 2.020 | 0.494 |
| Video time of day | 1.010 | 0.987 | Creator sex | 1.170 | 0.855 |
| Video length | 1.330 | 0.752 | Mean VIF | 1.350 |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) | (12) | (13) | (14) | (15) | (16) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Sales | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| (2) V-V title congruence | 0.049 *** | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| (3) V-P title congruence | 0.076 *** | 0.113 *** | 1 | |||||||||||||
| (4) Sociability | 0.030 *** | −0.267 *** | −0.235 *** | 1 | ||||||||||||
| (5) Creation frequency | −0.062 *** | 0.049 *** | −0.041 *** | −0.417 *** | 1 | |||||||||||
| (6) Brand | 0.326 *** | 0.057 *** | 0.050 *** | 0.058 *** | −0.120 *** | 1 | ||||||||||
| (7) Video day of week | 0.010 ** | 0.012 *** | 0.004 | −0.014 *** | 0.028 *** | 0.004 | 1 | |||||||||
| (8) Video time of day | 0.057 *** | 0.016 *** | 0.005 | 0.024 *** | −0.030 *** | 0.038 *** | −0.001 | 1 | ||||||||
| (9) Video length | 0.006 | −0.282 *** | −0.080 *** | 0.427 *** | −0.198 *** | 0.023 *** | 0 | −0.050 *** | 1 | |||||||
| (10) Video age | 0.069 *** | −0.007 * | −0.021 *** | 0.029 *** | −0.008 ** | 0.008 ** | 0.043 *** | 0.001 | −0.016 *** | 1 | ||||||
| (11) Video title length | 0.092 *** | 0.316 *** | 0.118 *** | −0.005 | −0.074 *** | 0.061 *** | 0.004 | −0.032 *** | −0.018 *** | −0.020 *** | 1 | |||||
| (12) Video tag number | 0.031 *** | 0.358 *** | 0.131 *** | −0.077 *** | −0.032 *** | 0.069 *** | −0.001 | −0.003 | −0.050 *** | 0.011 *** | 0.428 *** | 1 | ||||
| (13) Product price | −0.417 *** | −0.147 *** | −0.116 *** | 0.102 *** | 0.093 *** | −0.146 *** | −0.005 | −0.032 *** | 0.129 *** | −0.024 *** | −0.064 *** | −0.075 *** | 1 | |||
| (14) Creator fans | −0.049 *** | 0.073 *** | 0.047 *** | 0.298 *** | −0.037 *** | 0.034 *** | 0.001 | 0.041 *** | 0.026 *** | −0.001 | −0.034 *** | −0.074 *** | 0.076 *** | 1 | ||
| (15) Creator expertise | 0.015 *** | 0.171 *** | 0.045 *** | −0.390 *** | 0.682 *** | −0.083 *** | 0.005 | −0.008 * | −0.251 *** | −0.003 | 0.035 *** | 0.075 *** | −0.001 | −0.071 *** | 1 | |
| (16) Creator sex | −0.101 *** | 0.139 *** | −0.246 *** | −0.007 | 0.014 *** | −0.073 *** | 0.002 | −0.043 *** | −0.134 *** | 0.001 | 0.033 *** | −0.079 *** | −0.029 *** | 0.110 *** | −0.039 *** | 1 |
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sale | Sociability | Sale | Sale | Sociability | Sale | |
| V-V congruence | 0.356 *** | 0.381 *** | 0.248 *** | |||
| (0.056) | (0.022) | (0.056) | ||||
| V-P congruence | −0.201 *** | −0.206 *** | −0.141 ** | |||
| (0.069) | (0.028) | (0.069) | ||||
| Sociability | 0.281 *** | 0.284 *** | ||||
| (0.011) | (0.011) | |||||
| Video day of week | 0.035 | −0.022 ** | 0.042 * | 0.035 | −0.022 ** | 0.042 * |
| (0.023) | (0.009) | (0.022) | (0.023) | (0.009) | (0.022) | |
| Video time of day | −0.030 | 0.028 *** | −0.038 | −0.031 | 0.026 *** | −0.039 |
| (0.024) | (0.010) | (0.024) | (0.024) | (0.010) | (0.024) | |
| Video length | 0.706 *** | 0.804 *** | 0.476 *** | 0.709 *** | 0.807 *** | 0.475 *** |
| (0.064) | (0.030) | (0.064) | (0.064) | (0.030) | (0.064) | |
| Video age | 0.228 *** | 0.086 *** | 0.204 *** | 0.229 *** | 0.087 *** | 0.204 *** |
| (0.017) | (0.006) | (0.017) | (0.017) | (0.006) | (0.017) | |
| Video title length | 0.090 *** | 0.026 ** | 0.082 *** | 0.123 *** | 0.061 *** | 0.105 *** |
| (0.027) | (0.012) | (0.027) | (0.027) | (0.012) | (0.027) | |
| Video tag number | 0.061 * | 0.064 *** | 0.044 | 0.073 ** | 0.076 *** | 0.052 |
| (0.036) | (0.015) | (0.036) | (0.036) | (0.015) | (0.036) | |
| Product price | −0.986 *** | −0.970 *** | −0.988 *** | −0.971 *** | ||
| (0.020) | (0.020) | (0.020) | (0.020) | |||
| Creator fans | 0.282 | −0.091 | 0.302 | 0.304 | −0.070 | 0.317 |
| (0.195) | (0.090) | (0.194) | (0.196) | (0.091) | (0.195) | |
| Creator expertise | −0.171 *** | −0.199 *** | −0.114 *** | −0.183 *** | −0.212 *** | −0.122 *** |
| (0.026) | (0.011) | (0.026) | (0.026) | (0.011) | (0.026) | |
| Creator sex | 1.995 *** | 5.211 *** | 0.569 | 1.710 *** | 4.913 *** | 0.355 |
| (0.442) | (0.171) | (0.443) | (0.442) | (0.169) | (0.443) | |
| Month fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Creator fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sector fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | 6.635 *** | 3.486 *** | 5.644 ** | 6.612 *** | 3.491 *** | 5.614 ** |
| (2.522) | (1.162) | (2.503) | (2.530) | (1.164) | (2.510) | |
| N | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 |
| R2 | 0.549 | 0.745 | 0.555 | 0.549 | 0.744 | 0.555 |
| adj. R2 | 0.546 | 0.744 | 0.552 | 0.546 | 0.742 | 0.552 |
| Sale | Model 7 | Model 8 | Model 9 | Model 10 | Model 11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V-V title congruence | 0.354 *** | −0.082 | −0.064 | ||
| (0.057) | (0.071) | (0.071) | |||
| V-P title congruence | −0.250 *** | −0.821 *** | −0.738 *** | ||
| (0.069) | (0.094) | (0.094) | |||
| Creation frequency | −0.281 *** | 0.139 *** | 0.035 | ||
| (0.046) | (0.054) | (0.065) | |||
| Creation frequency × V-V title congruence | 0.148 ** | 0.153 *** | |||
| (0.060) | (0.058) | ||||
| Creation frequency × V-P title congruence | −0.501 *** | −0.458 *** | |||
| (0.072) | (0.070) | ||||
| Product brand | 1.330 *** | 0.982 *** | 0.740 *** | ||
| (0.055) | (0.083) | (0.092) | |||
| Product brand × V-V title congruence | 0.702 *** | 0.653 *** | |||
| (0.082) | (0.083) | ||||
| Product brand × V-P title congruence | 1.092 *** | 0.908 *** | |||
| (0.115) | (0.115) | ||||
| Month fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Creator fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sector fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Controls | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | 5.139 ** | 3.503 | 11.536 *** | 11.365 *** | 8.848 *** |
| (2.540) | (2.556) | (2.443) | (2.440) | (2.455) | |
| N | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 |
| R2 | 0.550 | 0.550 | 0.578 | 0.578 | 0.580 |
| adj. R2 | 0.547 | 0.547 | 0.576 | 0.576 | 0.577 |
| Hypothesis | Result | |
|---|---|---|
| Hypothesis 1 | V-V title congruence has a positive effect on SVA sociability. | Supported |
| Hypothesis 2 | V-P title congruence has a negative effect on SVA sociability. | Supported |
| Hypothesis 3 | SVA sociability has a positive effect on sales performance. | Supported |
| Hypothesis 4 | SVA sociability mediates the effects of title congruence on sales performance. | Supported |
| Hypothesis 5 | Creation frequency positively moderates the positive effect of V-V title congruence on SVA sales performance. | Supported |
| Hypothesis 6 | Creation frequency negatively moderates the negative effect of V-P title congruence on SVA sales performance. | Supported |
| Hypothesis 7 | Product brand positively moderates the positive effect of V-V title congruence on SVA sales performance. | Supported |
| Hypothesis 8 | Product brand positively moderates the negative effect of V-P title congruence on SVA sales performance. | Supported |
| Short Video Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Type 1 product-independent | The days don’t panic; we grow old together. Feel free to come to Sister Zhong’s live streaming tonight for peanuts. |
| Type 2 product-related | 9.9 RMB to make a photo frame for yourself with just a cell phone photo ~ love it so much! The days are getting cooler, and wearing shoes is good for sweaty feet. Foot odors dare not take off shoes, must try this shoe and sock freshness spray. Spray it to freshen up all day long #shoe and sock deodorizing spray. |
| Variable | Type 1 (N = 4947) | Type 2 (N = 52,245) | Mean Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title sentiment | 0.029 | 0.022 | 0.007 *** |
| Title first-person | 0.007 | 0.003 | 0.003 *** |
| Title vividness | 0.522 | 0.847 | −0.326 *** |
| Sales | Model 12 | Model 13 | Model 14 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title sentiment | −1.067 *** | ||
| (0.328) | |||
| Type | −0.110 ** | −0.128 *** | −0.141 *** |
| (0.046) | (0.045) | (0.052) | |
| Type × Title sentiment | 0.678 * | ||
| (0.395) | |||
| Title first-person | −4.335 *** | ||
| (1.587) | |||
| Type × Title first-person | 8.515 *** | ||
| (1.931) | |||
| Title vividness | −0.034 | ||
| (0.046) | |||
| Type × Title vividness | 0.111 ** | ||
| (0.046) | |||
| Month fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Creator fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Sector fixed effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Controls | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Cons | 7.328 *** | 7.156 *** | 6.781 *** |
| (2.520) | (2.518) | (2.517) | |
| N | 57,192 | 57,192 | 57,192 |
| R2 | 0.549 | 0.549 | 0.549 |
| adj. R2 | 0.546 | 0.546 | 0.546 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Han, D.; Jin, W.; Wu, Z.; Ge, R. How Does Short Video Advertisement Congruence Drive Sales? The Underlying Mechanism of Sociability. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 20, 312. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20040312
Han D, Jin W, Wu Z, Ge R. How Does Short Video Advertisement Congruence Drive Sales? The Underlying Mechanism of Sociability. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2025; 20(4):312. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20040312
Chicago/Turabian StyleHan, Dongmei, Wangyan Jin, Zhengze Wu, and Ruyi Ge. 2025. "How Does Short Video Advertisement Congruence Drive Sales? The Underlying Mechanism of Sociability" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 20, no. 4: 312. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20040312
APA StyleHan, D., Jin, W., Wu, Z., & Ge, R. (2025). How Does Short Video Advertisement Congruence Drive Sales? The Underlying Mechanism of Sociability. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(4), 312. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20040312

