When AI Meets Livestreaming: Exploring the Impact of Virtual Anchor on Tourist Travel Intention
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Travel Livestreaming (TLS) and AI-Based Anchors
2.2. Perceived Anthropomorphism
2.3. Perceived Playfulness
2.4. Telepresence
2.5. Inspiration
2.6. Hypotheses Development
3. Research Method
3.1. Questionnaire Design
3.2. Data Collection
4. Findings
4.1. Sample Background
4.2. Reliability and Validity of the Model
4.3. Hypothesis Testing
4.4. Mediating Role Testing
5. Discussion and Conclusions
5.1. Discussion
5.2. Theoretical Contributions
5.3. Practical Contributions
5.4. Limitations and Future Studies
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, J. Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in destination advertising: The impact of video-based destination anthropomorphism on destination image. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2025, 35, 100966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrasco-García, P.-M.; Frías-Jamilena, D.M.; Polo-Peña, A.I. Virtual tours: The effect of artificial intelligence and intelligent virtual environments on behavioral intention toward the tour and the tourist destination. Curr. Issues Tour. 2025, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, S.; Wu, M.; Liao, J. The impact of destination live streaming on viewers’ travel intention. Curr. Issues Tour. 2023, 26, 184–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Shi, D.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, B. How celebrity endorsement affects travel intention: Evidence from tourism live streaming. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2024, 48, 1493–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, X. Supervising or assisting? The influence of virtual anchor driven by AI-human collaboration on customer engagement in live streaming e-commerce. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 25, 3047–3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Chung, W. Digital emotional bonds: How virtual anchor characteristics drive user purchase intention in livestreaming e-commerce. SAGE Open 2025, 15, 21582440251342981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, D.; Wu, F.; Huang, Z.; Chen, Y. Navigating the human-digital nexus: Understanding consumer intentions with AI anchors in live commerce. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2025, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.-P.; Xin, L.; Wang, H.; Park, H.-W. Effects of AI virtual anchors on brand image and loyalty: Insights from perceived value theory and SEM-ANN analysis. Systems 2025, 13, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, S.; Cao, L.; Zhou, J. Is the anthropomorphic virtual anchor its optimal form? An exploration of the impact of virtual anchors’ appearance on consumers’ emotions and purchase intention. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 20, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, S.; Gu, X.; Xu, N.; Zheng, J.; Wu, W.; Jiang, M.; Xue, N. Live streaming mode selection strategy under the sackground of virtual anchor supplementation. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0321557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Shao, B.; Yang, X.; Kang, W.; Fan, W. Avatars in live streaming commerce: The influence of anthropomorphism on consumers’ willingness to accept virtual live streamers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2024, 156, 108216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Kim, M.; Lee, S.-M. Unlocking trust dynamics: An exploration of playfulness, expertise, and consumer behavior in virtual influencer marketing. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2025, 41, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Baek, T.H. Expertise and playfulness of social media influencers. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 2025, 46, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.; Surachartkumtonkun, J.; Shao, W. Playful TikTok videos: Investigating the role of mental imagery in customers’ social media sharing and destination attitude. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, C.; Hall, C.M.; Fong, L.H.N.; Liu, C.Y.N.; Koupaei, S.N. Vividness, narrative transportation, and sense of presence in destination marketing: Empirical evidence from augmented reality tourism. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2024, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thrash, T.M.; Elliot, A.J. Inspiration as a psychological construct. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 84, 871–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, M.; Liu, B.; Li, Y. Tourist inspiration: How the wellness tourism experience inspires tourist engagement. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2023, 47, 1115–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, P.M.B.; Pham, X.L.; Truong, G.N.T. The influence of source credibility and inspiration on tourists’ travel planning through travel vlogs. J. Travel Res. 2025, 64, 222–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, C.; Io, M.-U.; Hall, C.M.; Ngan, H.F.B.; Peralta, R.L. Exploring the influence of augmented reality on tourist word-of-mouth through the lens of museum tourism. J. Herit. Tour. 2025, 20, 78–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Zeng, Y.; Li, Z.; Huang, D. Understanding consumers’ motivations to view travel live streaming: Scale development and validation. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2022, 44, 101027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Huang, N.; He, Y.; Liu, D.; Guo, X.; Sun, Y.; Chen, G. Artificial intelligence (AI) assistant in online shopping: A randomized field experiment on a livestream selling platform. Inf. Syst. Res. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, W.; Jiang, N.; Guo, Q. How do virtual streamers affect purchase intention in the live streaming context? A presence perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 73, 103356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinoi, N.; Shankar, A.; Abdullah Alzeiby, E.; Gupta, P.; Agarwal, V. Unveiling customer intentions: Exploring factors driving engagement with hospitality virtual influencers. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2025, 34, 325–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, A.; Lee, R.H.; Legendre, T.S.; Madera, J. Anthropomorphism in hospitality and tourism: A systematic review and agenda for future research. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2022, 52, 404–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aggarwal, P.; McGill, A.L. Is that car smiling at me? Schema congruity as a basis for evaluating anthropomorphized products. J. Consum. Res. 2007, 34, 468–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, C.-L.; Chang, K.-C.; Chen, M.-C. The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intention: Perceived playfulness and perceived flow as mediators. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manag. 2012, 10, 549–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, T.; Ryu, S.; Han, I. The impact of Web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing. Inf. Manag. 2007, 44, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çelik, H. Influence of social norms, perceived playfulness and online shopping anxiety on customers’ adoption of online retail shopping. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2011, 39, 390–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barta, S.; Gurrea, R.; Flavián, C. Telepresence in live-stream shopping: An experimental study comparing Instagram and the metaverse. Electron. Mark. 2023, 33, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ongsakul, V.; Ali, F.; Wu, C.; Duan, Y.; Cobanoglu, C.; Ryu, K. Hotel website quality, performance, telepresence and behavioral intentions. Tour. Rev. 2020, 76, 681–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, C.; Fong, L.H.N.; Li, X.; Buhalis, D.; Chen, H. Short video marketing in tourism: Telepresence, celebrity attachment, and travel intention. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2024, 26, e2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, H.; Kang, J. How does the metaverse travel experience influence virtual and actual travel behaviors? Focusing on the role of telepresence and avatar identification. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2024, 58, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Junior Ladeira, W.; de Oliveira Santini, F.; Rasul, T.; Hasan Jafar, S.; Carlos De Oliveira Rosa, J.; Frantz, B.; Zandonai Pontin, P.; Antonio Lampert Dornelles, L. Telepresence in tourism and hospitality: A meta-analytic review of virtual environment. Curr. Issues Tour. 2025, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.; Wei, W.; Zhang, L. Seeing destinations through vlogs: Implications for leveraging customer engagement behavior to increase travel intention. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 32, 3227–3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Xu, L.; Feng, W.; Zhou, J.; Li, Y. Is tourism live streaming a double-edged sword? The paradoxical impact of online flow experience on travel intentions. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2023, 40, 744–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, F.; Zhang, Y.; Lai, Y.; Lin, Y.; Zhou, G. The influence mechanism of travel livestreaming’s (TLS) characteristics on users’ tourism well-being. Curr. Issues Tour. 2025, 28, 153–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.-H.; Kim, M.; Park, M.; Yoo, J. How interactivity and vividness influence consumer virtual reality shopping experience: The mediating role of telepresence. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2021, 15, 502–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; Gu, G. How travel live streaming affects viewers’ travel intentions: The mediating role of sense of presence and perceived usefulness. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2025, 27, 70054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Zhou, W.; Chen, Y. Factors influencing users’ watching intention in virtual streaming: The perspective of flow experience. Kybernetes 2024, 53, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Csikszentmihalyi, M.; Csikzentmihaly, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience; Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Faiola, A.; Smyslova, O. Flow experience in Second Life: The impact of telepresence on human-computer interaction. In Online Communities and Social Computing; Ozok, A.A., Zaphiris, P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2009; pp. 574–583. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, B.; Dastane, O.; Aw, E.C.-X.; Jha, S. The future of live-streaming commerce: Understanding the role of AI-powered virtual streamers. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2024, 37, 1175–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, N.; Khynevych, R.; Hao, Y.; Wang, Y. Effect of anthropomorphism and perceived intelligence in chatbot avatars of visual design on user experience: Accounting for perceived empathy and trust. Front. Comput. Sci. 2025, 7, 1531976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, P.; Aw, E.C.-X.; Tan, G.W.-H. Empowerment to commitment: How live-streaming atmosphere and relational bonds drive impulse consumption? J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2024, 19, 549–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ying, T.; Tang, J.; Ye, S.; Tan, X.; Wei, W. Virtual reality in destination marketing: Telepresence, social presence, and tourists’ visit intentions. J. Travel Res. 2022, 61, 1738–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, S.; Choi, Y.; Lee, C.-K. Virtual travel experience and destination marketing: Effects of sense and information quality on flow and visit intention. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2021, 19, 100492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Böttger, T.; Rudolph, T.; Evanschitzky, H.; Pfrang, T. Customer inspiration: Conceptualization, scale development, and validation. J. Mark. 2017, 81, 116–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, G.I.; Wong, I.A.; Zhang, C.J.; Liang, Q. Generative AI inspiration and hotel recommendation acceptance: Does anxiety over lack of transparency matter? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2025, 126, 104112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moon, J.-W.; Kim, Y.-G. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Inf. Manag. 2001, 38, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, F.; Wang, D.; Kirillova, K. Travel inspiration in tourist decision making. Tour. Manag. 2022, 90, 104484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assiouras, I.; Giannopoulos, A.; Mavragani, E.; Buhalis, D. Virtual reality and mental imagery towards travel inspiration and visit intention. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2024, 26, 2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M. Parasocial interactions in digital tourism: Attributes of live streamers and viewer engagement dynamics in South Korea. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Wang, X. The effect of virtual anchor appearance on purchase intention: A perceived warmth and competence perspective. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2024, 34, 84–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, C.; Wu, D.C.W.; Hall, C.M.; Fong, L.H.N.; Koupaei, S.N.; Lin, F. Exploring non-immersive virtual reality experiences in tourism: Empirical evidence from a world heritage site. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2023, 25, 372–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, S.-C.; Tseng, H.-T.; Shirazi, F.; Hajli, N.; Tsai, P.-T. Exploring factors influencing impulse buying in live streaming shopping: A stimulus-organism-response (SOR) perspective. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2023, 35, 1383–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fakharyan, M.; Jalilvand, M.R.; Elyasi, M.; Mohammadi, M. The influence of online word of mouth communications on tourists’ attitudes toward Islamic destinations and travel intention: Evidence from Iran. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2012, 6, 10381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Y.; Huang, S. Live streaming in hospitality and tourism: A hybrid systematic review and way forward. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2025, 37, 1924–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, X.; Qu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Hu, J. How the destination short video affects the customers’ attitude: The role of narrative transportation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 62, 102672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, X.; Huo, Y.; Luo, P. What drives impulsive travel intention in tourism live streaming? A chain mediation model based on SOR framework. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2024, 41, 169–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, X.; Fu, S. Tourism live streaming: Uncovering the effects of responsiveness and knowledge spillover on travelling intentions. Tour. Rev. 2024, 79, 1126–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, E.; Rahman, S.M.; Wilden, R.; Lin, N.; Harrison, N. Leveraging Customer Knowledge Obtained Through Social Media: The Roles of R&D Intensity and Absorptive Capacity. J. Bus. Res. 2024, 182, 114811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klein, L.R. Creating virtual product experiences: The role of telepresence. J. Interact. Mark. 2003, 17, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liapis, A.; Guckelsberger, C.; Zhu, J.; Harteveld, C.; Kriglstein, S.; Denisova, A.; Gow, J.; Preuss, M. Designing for playfulness in human-AI authoring tools. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG ‘23), Lisbon, Portugal, 12–14 April 2023; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
Gender | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Male | 110 | 37.8% |
Female | 181 | 62.2% |
Salary monthly | ||
CNY 4000 or CNY 4000 below | 41 | 14.1% |
CNY 4001–6000 | 90 | 30.9% |
CNY 6001–8000 | 61 | 21.0% |
CNY 8001–10,000 | 55 | 18.9% |
CNY 10,001–15,000 | 27 | 9.3% |
Over CNY 15,000 | 17 | 5.8% |
Education | ||
Primary school | 1 | 0.3% |
Middle school | 15 | 5.2% |
Junior college | 61 | 21.0% |
Undergraduate | 184 | 63.2% |
Graduate | 30 | 10.3% |
Age | ||
18–25 | 71 | 24.4% |
26–30 | 92 | 31.6% |
31–35 | 62 | 21.3% |
36–40 | 36 | 12.4% |
41–45 | 9 | 3.1% |
46–50 | 8 | 2.7% |
Over 50 | 13 | 4.5% |
Perceived Anthropomorphism (PA) | Factor Loading |
---|---|
PA-1: Tourism livestreaming virtual anchors appear to possess their own intelligence. | 0.841 |
PA-2: The tourism livestreaming virtual anchor can evoke emotional responses. | 0.845 |
PA-3: I perceive the tourism livestreaming virtual anchor as being a living entity. | 0.783 |
PA-4: The tourism livestreaming virtual anchor appears to be real, almost lifelike. | 0.831 |
Perceived Playfulness (PP) | |
PP-1 I share with my friends interesting content about the virtual anchor in tourism livestreaming. | 0.827 |
PP-2 I observe that the virtual anchor in tourism livestreaming is interesting. | 0.893 |
PP-3 Watching the virtual anchor in tourism livestreaming makes me happy. | 0.881 |
PP-4 To participate in the virtual anchor’s tourism livestreaming is an interesting activity for me. | 0.881 |
Telepresence (TE) | |
TP-1: I forgot about my immediate surroundings when I watched the virtual anchor’s tourism livestreaming. | 0.924 |
TP-2: Watching the virtual anchor’s tourism livestreaming made me forget where I was. | 0.911 |
TP-3: After watching the virtual anchor’s tourism livestreaming, I felt like I came back to the “real world” after a journey. | 0.905 |
Inspiration (INS) | |
INS1: The virtual anchor’s tourism livestreaming represented the destination in an appealing way. | 0.882 |
INS2: The virtual anchor’s tourism livestreaming helped me to be imaginative about the destination. | 0.898 |
INS3: The virtual anchor’s tourism livestreaming inspired me to visit the destination. | 0.913 |
Travel Intention (TI) | |
TI-1: I predict that I will visit the destination introduced by the AI-based virtual anchor in the travel livestreaming in the future. | 0.893 |
TI-2: I would visit a destination introduced by the AI-based virtual anchor in the travel livestreaming rather than other tourism destinations. | 0.896 |
TI-3: If everything goes as I think, I will plan to visit the destination introduced by the AI-based virtual anchor in the travel livestreaming in the future. | 0.904 |
Cronbach’s Alpha | CR | AVE | INS | PA | PP | TE | TI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INS | 0.879 | 0.926 | 0.806 | 0.898 | ||||
PA | 0.844 | 0.895 | 0.681 | 0.677 | 0.825 | |||
PP | 0.894 | 0.926 | 0.758 | 0.841 | 0.758 | 0.871 | ||
TE | 0.900 | 0.938 | 0.834 | 0.686 | 0.713 | 0.744 | 0.913 | |
TI | 0.880 | 0.926 | 0.806 | 0.828 | 0.671 | 0.787 | 0.725 | 0.898 |
Path Coefficient | T Statistics | p Values | Results | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PA -> INS | 0.093 ns | 1.618 | 0.106 | Rejected |
PA -> TE | 0.350 *** | 5.546 | 0.000 | Accepted |
PA -> TI | 0.048 ns | 0.89 | 0.373 | Rejected |
PP -> INS | 0.771 *** | 15.28 | 0.000 | Accepted |
PP -> TE | 0.479 *** | 7.029 | 0.000 | Accepted |
PP -> TI | 0.147 ns | 1.545 | 0.123 | Rejected |
TE -> TI | 0.229 ** | 2.84 | 0.005 | Accepted |
INS -> TI | 0.515 *** | 6.965 | 0.000 | Accepted |
Indirect Effect | T Statistics | p Values | |
---|---|---|---|
PA -> INS -> TI | 0.048 ns | 1.604 | 0.109 |
PP -> INS -> TI | 0.397 *** | 6.198 | 0.000 |
PA -> TE -> TI | 0.080 * | 2.341 | 0.019 |
PP -> TE -> TI | 0.110 ** | 2.844 | 0.004 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhu, Z.; Hall, C.M.; Tao, L.; Qin, Z.; Li, Y. When AI Meets Livestreaming: Exploring the Impact of Virtual Anchor on Tourist Travel Intention. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 20, 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20030239
Zhu Z, Hall CM, Tao L, Qin Z, Li Y. When AI Meets Livestreaming: Exploring the Impact of Virtual Anchor on Tourist Travel Intention. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2025; 20(3):239. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20030239
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhu, Zhengan, Colin M. Hall, Li Tao, Zichan Qin, and Yue Li. 2025. "When AI Meets Livestreaming: Exploring the Impact of Virtual Anchor on Tourist Travel Intention" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 20, no. 3: 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20030239
APA StyleZhu, Z., Hall, C. M., Tao, L., Qin, Z., & Li, Y. (2025). When AI Meets Livestreaming: Exploring the Impact of Virtual Anchor on Tourist Travel Intention. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(3), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20030239