Use of Mobile Grocery Shopping Application: Motivation and Decision-Making Process among South Korean Consumers
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. M-Commerce: Mobile Grocery Shopping
2.2. Motivational Use of Mobile Grocery Shopping
2.3. Decision-Making Process of Mobile Grocery Shopping
2.4. Hypotheses and Research Question
3. Method
3.1. Data Collection
3.2. Measurement
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Sample Characteristics
4.2. Measurement Model
4.3. Hypothesis Tests
4.4. Comparison between Users and Non-Users
5. Discussion
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Construct | Indicator | Items |
---|---|---|
Utilitarian Factor | Ut1 | I tend to use mobile grocery shopping app when buying groceries. |
Ut2 | I lie to use the mobile grocery app with no time wasted. | |
Ut3 | Mobile grocery app enables quick shopping. | |
Ut4 | Mobile grocery app enables easy shopping. | |
Hedonic Factor | He1 | I use mobile grocery app to spend an enjoyable and relaxing time. |
He2 | I use mobile grocery app for fun and pleasure. | |
He3 | When I use mobile grocery app, I find enjoyment. | |
He4 | Using mobile grocery app is truly a joy. | |
Experiential Factor | Ex1 | I enjoy using my skills and knowledge in mobile grocery app. |
Ex2 | I enjoy immersion in grocery shopping with mobile app. | |
Ex3 | I enjoy using mobile grocery app for its own sake. | |
Attitude | At1 | Using mobile grocery app is a good idea. |
At2 | Using mobile grocery app is a wise idea. | |
At3 | I like the idea of purchasing grocery by using mobile app. | |
At4 | Purchasing grocery by using mobile app would be pleasant. | |
At5 | Purchasing grocery by using mobile app is appealing | |
Subjective Norms | Su1 | Most people who are important to me would think that I could buy grocery by using mobile app. |
Su2 | Most people who I value could buy grocery by using mobile app. | |
Su3 | Most people who are important to me approve of my using mobile app for grocery shopping. | |
Behavioral Control | Bc1 | I find myself pressed for time, when I do my grocery shopping by using mobile app. |
Bc2 | I am in a hurry when I do my grocery shopping by using mobile app. | |
Bc3 | Finding a suitable delivery time for when I am home is difficult for me. | |
Bc4 | Finding the time to shop grocery by using mobile app in advance is difficult for me. | |
Behavioral Intention | Bi1 | I intend to use mobile grocery app when the service becomes widely available. |
Bi2 | Whenever possible, I intend to use mobile app to purchase groceries. | |
Bi3 | I intend to use mobile grocery app when there is free home delivery. | |
Bi4 | I intend to use mobile grocery app when the price is competitive. | |
Purchase Behavior | Pb1 | How many times do you use mobile grocery shopping app during a month? |
Pb2 | How many hours do you use mobile grocery shopping app every month? | |
Pb3 | How frequently do you use mobile grocery shopping app? |
References
- Brand, C.; Schwanen, T.; Anable, J. Online Omnivores’ or ‘Willing but struggling’? Identifying online grocery shopping behavior segments using attitude theory. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 57, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blitstein, J.L.; Lazar, D.; Gregory, K.; McLoughlin, C.; Rosul, L.; Rains, C.; Hellman, T.; Leruth, C.; Mejia, J. Foods for health: An integrated social medical approach to food insecurity among patients with diabetes. Am. J. Health Promo. 2021, 35, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Driediger, F.; Bhatiasevi, V. Online grocery shopping in Thailand: Consumer acceptance and usage behavior. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 48, 224–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Online Grocery Sales to Reach $100 Billion in 2025; Amazon is Current and Future Leader. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/pamdanziger/2018/01/18/online-grocery-sales-to-reach-100-billion-in-2025-amazon-set-to-be-market-share-leader/?sh=7787af3e62f3 (accessed on 13 May 2019).
- Meena, S.; Swerdlow, F.; Kumar, S. The State of Global Online Grocery Retail; Forrester Research Inc.: Cambridge, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Global Online Grocery Market to Hit USD 1 Trillion by 2026: Global Market Insights, Inc. Available online: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2020/12/02/2138049/0/en/Global-Online-Grocery-Market-to-hit-USD-1-Trillion-by-2026-Global-Market-Insights-Inc.html (accessed on 2 December 2020).
- Etumnu, C.E.; Widmar, N.O. Grocery shopping in the digital era. Choices 2020, 35, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Hui, A.; Walker, G. Concepts and methodologies for a new relational geography of energy demand: Social practices, doing-places and settings. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2018, 36, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grewal, D.; Roggeveen, A.L.; Nordfält, J. The future of retailing. J. Retail. 2017, 93, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perez, S. Walmart Grocery App Sees Record Downloads Amid COVID-19, Surpasses Amazon by 20%. Tech Crunch. Available online: https://techcrunch.com/2020/04/09/walmart-grocery-app-sees-record-downloads-amid-covid-19-surpasses-amazon-by-20 (accessed on 9 April 2020).
- Statista. Number of Adult Grocery App Users in the United States from 2017 to 2022 (in Millions). Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1013928/number-of-grocery-app-users-us (accessed on 27 November 2020).
- Langford, R. Food and Grocery Delivery App Downloads ‘Grew 33% Globally During Pandemic.’ Netimperative. Digital Intelligence for Business. 2021. Available online: https://www.netimperative.com/2021/05/11/food-and-grocery-delivery-app-downloads-grew-33-globally-during-pandemic (accessed on 1 May 2021).
- Research and Markets. Global Online Grocery Shopping Industry Report 2020—The, U.S. Accounts for over 28.8% of the Global Market. 2021. Available online: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2020/09/07/2089547/0/en/Global-Online-Grocery-Shopping-Industry-Report-2020-The-U-S-Accounts-for-Over-28-8-of-the-Global-Market.html (accessed on 7 September 2020).
- Harris, B. South Koreans Buy the Most Groceries Online, by Far. World Economic Forum. 2017. Available online: https://medium.com/world-economic-forum/south-koreans-buy-the-most-groceries-online-by-far-be3388b041d2 (accessed on 7 December 2017).
- Yoon, H. The Traditional Market Goes Online. Chosun Daily. Available online: https://biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2020/09/23/2020092303177.html (accessed on 24 September 2020).
- Horning, M.L.; Porter, L.R.; Hassan, A.; Edson, E. Full-Service Twin Cities Mobile Market Impact: Qualitative Findings From Focus Groups With Customers. J. Acad. Nutri. Diet. 2020, 120, 1548–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saprikis, V.; Markos, A.; Zarmpou, T.; Vlachopoulou, M. Mobile shopping consumers’ behavior: An exploratory study and review. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2018, 13, 71–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yoon, K. A Wide Variety of Online Grocery Shopping. Joins. 2020. Available online: https://news.joins.com/article/23869929 (accessed on 11 September 2020).
- Van Droogenbroeck, E.; Van Hove, L. Adoption of online grocery shopping: Personal or household characteristics? J. Int. Commer. 2017, 16, 255–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prabowo, H.; Hindarwati, E.N. Online Grocery Shopping Adoption: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, Bandung, Indonesia, 13–14 August 2020; pp. 40–45. [Google Scholar]
- Handayani, P.W.; Nurahmawati, R.A.; Pinem, A.A.; Azzahro, F. Switching intention from traditional to online groceries using the moderating effect of gender in Indonesia. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2020, 26, 425–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katz, E.; Blumler, J.G.; Gurevitch, M. Uses and gratifications research. Publ. Opin. Quart. 1973, 37, 509–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. J. App. Soc. Psychol. 2002, 32, 665–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vibes 2016 Mobile Consumer Study. Available online: https://vibes-marketing.s3.amazonaws.com/Website/Reports_$folder$/2016-MobileConsumerReport.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2016).
- Voropanova, E. Conceptualizing smart shopping with a smartphone: Implications of the use of mobile devices for shopping productivity and value. Int. Rev. Retail. Distrib. Consum. Res. 2015, 25, 529–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frank, D.A.; Peschel, A.O. Sweetening the deal: The ingredients that drive consumer adoption of online grocery shopping. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2020, 26, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donegan, M. The m-commerce challenge. Telecommunications 2000, 34, 58. [Google Scholar]
- Liebmann, L. The bottom line-preparing for m-commerce. Commun. News 2000, 37, 132. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.J.; Yuan, Y.; Archer, N. Driving forces for m-commerce success. J. Internet Commer. 2002, 1, 81–104. [Google Scholar]
- What is the Difference between E-Commerce and Mobile Commerce? Forbes. Available online: http://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2018/05/25/what-is-the-difference-between-e-commerce-and-mobile-commerce/?sh=1941b2224c6d (accessed on 25 May 2018).
- Zheng, X.; Men, J.; Yang, F.; Gong, X. Understanding impulse buying in mobile commerce: An investigation into hedonic and utilitarian browsing. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 48, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McQuail, D. Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction; SAGE Publications: London, UK, 2010; pp. 420–430. [Google Scholar]
- Bailey, A.A.; Bonifield, C.M.; Elhai, J.D. Modelling consumer engagement on social networking sites: Roles of attitudinal and motivational factors. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 59, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, T.; Wang, W.Y.C.; Cao, L.; Wang, Y. The role of virtual try-on technology in online purchase decision from consumers’ aspect. Int. Res. 2019, 29, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, A.; Dhir, A.; Bala, P.K.; Kaur, P. Why do people use food delivery apps (FDA)? A uses and gratification theory perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 51, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asioli, D.; Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Caputo, V.; Vecchio, R.; Annunziata, A.; Næs, T.; Varela, P. Making sense of the “clean label” trends: A review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications. Food Res. Int. 2017, 99, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wagner, G.; Schramm-Klein, H.; Steinmann, S. Online retailing across e-channels and e-channel touchpoints: Empirical studies of consumer behavior in the multichannel e-commerce environment. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 107, 256–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.C.; Hsiao, K.L.; Li, W.C. Exploring the determinants of usage continuance willingness for location-based apps: A case study of bicycle-based exercise apps. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 55, 102097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korhan, O.; Ersoy, M. Usability and functionality factors of the social network site application users from the perspective of uses and gratification theory. Qual. Quant. 2016, 50, 1799–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, S.; Khalid, N.; Javed, H.M.U.; Islam, D.M. Consumer adoption of online food delivery ordering (OFDO) services in Pakistan: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic situation. J. Open Inno. Techno. Mark. Compl. 2021, 7, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- Busalim, A.H.; Ghabban, F. Customer engagement behavior on social commerce platforms: An empirical study. Techno. Soc. 2021, 64, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Islam, J.U.; Rahman, Z. The impact of online brand community characteristics on customer engagement: An application of Stimulus-Organism-Response paradigm. Telemat. Inform. 2017, 34, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verhagen, T.; Feldberg, F.; van den Hooff, B.; Meents, S.; Merikivi, J. Understanding users’ motivations to engage in virtual worlds: A multipurpose model and empirical testing. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012, 28, 484–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Lu, Y.; Gupta, S.; Zhao, L. What motivates customers to participate in social commerce? The impact of technological environments and virtual customer experiences. Inf. Manag. 2014, 51, 1017–1030. [Google Scholar]
- Venkatesh, V.; Brown, S.A. A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Q. 2001, 25, 71–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rese, A.; Ganster, L.; Baier, D. Chatbots in retailers’ customer communication: How to measure their acceptance? J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 56, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picot-Coupey, K.; Krey, N.; Huré, E.; Ackermann, C.L. Still work and/or fun? Corroboration of the hedonic and utilitarian shopping value scale. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 126, 578–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, H.; Peak, D.A.; Prybutok, V. A virtual market in your pocket: How does mobile augmented reality (MAR) influence consumer decision making? J. Retail. Consum. Ser. 2021, 58, 102337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rauschnabel, P.A.; Rossmann, A.; Tom Dieck, M.C. An adoption framework for mobile augmented reality games: The case of Pokémon Go. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 76, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dickinger, A.; Arami, M.; Meyer, D. The role of perceived enjoyment and social norm in the adoption of technology with network externalities. Eur. J. Inf. Sys. 2008, 17, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, E.J. Creating value for online shoppers: Implications for satisfaction and loyalty. Asia-Pacific Adv. Consum. Res. 2005, 6, 370. [Google Scholar]
- Chung, Y.S. Hedonic and utilitarian shopping values in airport shopping behavior. J. Air Trans. Manag. 2015, 49, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiore, A.M.; Kim, J.; Lee, H.H. Effect of image interactivity technology on consumer responses toward the online retailer. J. Interact. Mark. 2005, 19, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koufaris, M.; Kambil, A.; LaBarbera, P.A. Consumer behavior in web-based commerce: An empirical study. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2001, 6, 115–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, C.L.; Lin, J.C.C. Effect of perceived value and social influences on mobile app stickiness and in-app purchase intention. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2016, 108, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, C.L.; Yu, L.C.; Chao, H.Y. How Online Beauty Brand Community users’ Experience Contributes to their Experiential Value, Attitudes and Continuance Intention. Manag. Rev. 2019, 38, 77–88. [Google Scholar]
- Demangeot, C.; Broderick, A.J. Exploring the experiential intensity of online shopping environments. Qual. Mark. Res. Int. J. 2006, 9, 325–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agrawal, A.K.; Rahman, Z. CCV scale: Development and validation of customer co-created value scale in e-services. Curr. Psychol. 2019, 38, 720–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ur Rahman, S.; Khan, M.A.; Iqbal, N. Motivations and barriers to purchasing online: Understanding consumer responses. South Asian J. Bus. Stud. 2018, 7, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ko, H.C. Beyond browsing: Motivations for experiential browsing and goal-directed shopping intentions on social commerce websites. J. Internet Commer. 2020, 19, 212–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, C.; Kim, Y.G. Application of the stimuli-organism-response (SOR) framework to online shopping behavior. J. Internet Commer. 2014, 13, 159–176. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, H.J.; Lyu, J. Personal values as determinants of intentions to use self-service technology in retailing. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 60, 322–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 2, 314–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lien, C.H.; Cao, Y. Examining WeChat users’ motivations, trust, attitudes, and positive word-of-mouth: Evidence from China. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 41, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peña-García, N.; Gil-Saura, I.; Rodríguez-Orejuela, A.; Siqueira-Junior, J.R. Purchase intention and purchase behavior online: A cross-cultural approach. Heliyon 2020, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aiolfi, S.; Bellini, S. Using mobile applications: A model of technology adoption in the grocery setting. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2019, 14, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kokkonen, A.; Laukkanen, T. How mobile applications affect consumption in grocery stores. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu, HI, USA, 8–11 January 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, E.; Ham, S.; Yang, I.S.; Choi, J.G. The roles of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control in the formation of consumers’ behavioral intentions to read menu labels in the restaurant industry. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2013, 35, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoeksma, D.L.; Gerritzen, M.A.; Lokhorst, A.M.; Poortvliet, P.M. An extended theory of planned behavior to predict consumers’ willingness to buy mobile slaughter unit meat. Meat Sci. 2019, 128, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amaro, S.; Duarte, P. An integrative model of consumers’ intentions to purchase travel online. Tour. Manag. 2015, 46, 64–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dabholkar, P.A.; Sheng, X. The role of perceived control and gender in consumer reactions to download delays. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 62, 756–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casaló, L.V.; Flavián, C.; Guinalíu, M. Determinants of the intention to participate in firm-hosted online travel communities and effects on consumer behavioral intentions. Tour. Manag. 2010, 31, 898–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kashif, M.; Zarkada, A.; Ramayah, T. The impact of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control on managers’ intentions to behave ethically. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 2018, 29, 481–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Zhou, T.; Wang, B. Exploring Chinese users’ acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2009, 25, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yunus, N.S.N.M.; Ghani, N.M.A.; Rashid, W.E.W. The acceptance and the intention of online groceries shopping in Malaysia. J. Appl. Environ. Bio. Sci. 2016, 6, 29–34. [Google Scholar]
- Hansen, J.M.; Saridakis, G.; Benson, V. Risk, trust, and the interaction of perceived ease of use and behavioral control in predicting consumers’ use of social media for transactions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 80, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- La Barbera, F.; Ajzen, I. Control interactions in the theory of planned behavior: Rethinking the role of subjective norm. Eur. J. Psychol. 2020, 16, 401–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dean, M.; Raats, M.M.; Shepherd, R. Moral concerns and consumer choice of fresh and processed organic foods 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2008, 38, 2088–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pawlak, R.; Malinauskas, B.; Rivera, D. Predicting intentions to eat a healthful diet by college baseball players: Applying the theory of planned behavior. J. Nutri. Edu. Behav. 2009, 41, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tarkiainen, A.; Sundqvist, S. Subjective norms, attitudes and intentions of Finnish consumers in buying organic food. Br. Food J. 2005, 107, 808–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wong, C.L.; Mullan, B.A. Predicting breakfast consumption: An application of the theory of planned behavior and the investigation of past behavior and executive function. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2009, 14, 489–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett, T.; Feng, Y. Evaluation of food safety curriculum effectiveness: A longitudinal study of high-school-aged youths’ knowledge retention, risk-perception, and perceived behavioral control. Food Control. 2021, 121, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Francis, J.; Eccles, M.P.; Johnston, M.; Walker, A.E.; Grimshaw, J.M.; Foy, R.; Kaner, E.F.S.; Smith, L.; Bonetti, D. Constructing Questionnaires Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Manual for Health Services Researchers; University of London: London, UK, 2004; pp. 1–42. [Google Scholar]
- De Leeuw, A.; Valois, P.; Ajzen, I.; Schmidt, P. Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. J. Environ. Psychol. 2015, 42, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlou, P.A.; Fygenson, M. Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Q. 2006, 30, 115–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, E.; Park, M.C.; Lee, J. Determinants of the intention to use Buy-Online, Pickup In-Store (BOPS): The moderating effects of situational factors and product type. Telemat. Inform. 2017, 34, 1721–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Duan, W.; Zhou, W. The interplay between free sampling and word of mouth in the online software market. Deci. Sup. Sys. 2017, 95, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, D.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, D. Empirical study of consumers’ purchase intentions in C2C electronic commerce. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 2008, 13, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laohapensang, O. Factors influencing internet shopping behavior: A survey of consumers in Thailand. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 2009, 13, 501–513. [Google Scholar]
- Rehman, S.U.; Bhatti, A.; Mohamed, R.; Ayoup, H. The moderating role of trust and commitment between consumer purchase intention and online shopping behavior in the context of Pakistan. J. Glob. Entrep. Res. 2019, 9, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, T. Consumer values, the theory of planned behaviour and online grocery shopping. Int. J. Consum. St. 2008, 32, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shim, S.; Eastlick, M.A.; Lotz, S.L.; Warrington, P. An online pre-purchase intentions model: The role of intention to search. J. Retail. 2001, 77, 397–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossiter, J.R.; Percy, L. Advertising and Promotion Management; McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Kinnally, W.; Bolduc, H. Integrating the theory of planned behavior and uses and gratifications to understand music streaming intentions and behavior. Atl. J. Commun. 2020, 28, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Liang, C.; Cai, D. Understanding WeChat users’ behavior of sharing social crisis information. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2018, 34, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Sheng, D.; Gu, D.; Du, J.T.; Min, C. Understanding link sharing tools continuance behavior in social media. Online Inform. Rev. 2017, 41, 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Kuang, W. Exploring Influence Factors of WeChat Users’ Health Information Sharing Behavior: Based on an Integrated Model of TPB, UGT and SCT. Int. J. Hum. Comut. Interact. 2021, 37, 1243–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klepek, M.; Bauerová, R. Why do retail customers hesitate for shopping grocery online? Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2020, 26, 1444–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM); Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2021; pp. 1–384. [Google Scholar]
- Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.G.; Buchner, A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Method. 2007, 39, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dattalo, P. Determining Sample Size: Balancing Power, Precision, and Practicality; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 1–163. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, R. Why do online grocery shoppers switch or stay? An exploratory analysis of consumers’ response to online grocery shopping experience. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2019, 47, 1300–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, S.; Law, R.; Schuckert, M. Mediating effects of attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control for mobile payment-based hotel reservations. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 84, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statistics Korea. 2020. Available online: http://kostat.go.kr/portal/eng/index.action (accessed on 24 February 2021).
- Nunnally, J.C.; Bernstein, I.H. The theory of measurement error. Psychom. Theory 1994, 3, 209–247. [Google Scholar]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preacher, K.J.; Hayes, A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Method 2008, 40, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, S.A.; Qazi, W.; Shah, N.; Qureshi, M.A.; Qaiser, S.; Ali, R. Drivers of intensive Facebook usage among university students: An implications of U&G and TPB theories. Technol. Soc. 2020, 62, 101331. [Google Scholar]
- Valois, P.; Desharnais, R.; Godin, G.; Perron, J.; Lecomte, C. Psychometric properties of a perceived behavioral control multiplicative scale developed according to Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Psychol. Rep. 1993, 72 (Suppl. 3), 1079–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taherdoost, H. A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufac. 2018, 22, 960–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafiq Obeidat, M.; Young, W.D. An assessment of the recognition and use of online shopping by digital immigrants and natives in India and China. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2017, 29, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blake, B.F.; LaRosa, R.J.; Neuendorf, K.A.; Luming, Y.; Hudzinski, K.; Zhou, W. Reliance on E-Shopping Vehicles: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Cross-National Market Differences. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2018, 30, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drugău-Constantin, A. Is Consumer Cognition Reducible to Neurophysiological Functioning? Econ. Manag. Fin. Mark. 2019, 14, 9–14. [Google Scholar]
- Hollowell, J.C.; Rowland, Z.; Kliestik, T.; Kliestikova, J.; Dengov, V.V. Customer Loyalty in the Sharing Economy Platforms: How Digital Personal Reputation and Feedback Systems Facilitate Interaction and Trust between Strangers. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2019, 7, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
- Mircică, N. Restoring Public Trust in Digital Platform Operations: Machine Learning Algorithmic Structuring of Social Media Content. Rev. Contem. Phil. 2020, 19, 85–91. [Google Scholar]
- Popescu, G.H.; Ciurlău, F.C. Making Decisions in Collaborative Consumption: Digital Trust and Reputation Systems in the Sharing Economy. J. Self-Gov. Manag. Econ. 2019, 7, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
Characteristics | Categories | Frequency (#) | Percentage (%) | χ2 (p) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
User | Non User | Total | User | Non User | Total | |||
Gender | Male Female | 120 | 106 | 226 420 | 19.2 | 16.9 | 36.1 64.9 | 0.48 |
212 | 208 | 32.7 | 32.2 | |||||
Age | 20–29 30–39 40–49 50–59 | 99 | 85 | 184 212 167 83 | 15.3 | 12.2 | 28.5 32.8 25.8 12.9 | 56.88 * |
127 | 85 | 19.7 | 13.1 | |||||
77 | 90 | 11.9 | 13.9 | |||||
29 | 54 | 4.5 | 8.4 | |||||
Education | High school diploma College student Bachelor’s degree Postgraduate degree | 48 | 70 | 118 65 408 55 | 7.3 | 10.8 | 18.3 10.1 63.1 8.5 | 8.13 * |
36 | 29 | 5.6 | 4.5 | |||||
216 | 192 | 33.4 | 29.7 | |||||
32 | 23 | 4.9 | 3.6 | |||||
Occupation | Student Employee Self employed Unemployed Other | 37 | 27 | 64 | 5.7 | 4.2 | 9.9 50.3 9.3 24.2 6.3 | 13.44 |
173 | 152 | 325 | 26.8 | 23.5 | ||||
30 | 30 | 60 | 4.6 | 4.6 | ||||
70 | 86 | 156 | 10.9 | 13.3 | ||||
22 | 19 | 41 | 3.4 | 2.9 | ||||
Monthly Income | ₩300,000 or under | 30 | 57 | 87 | 4.6 | 8.7 | 13.5 | 14.77 * |
₩300,000–₩1,000,000 | 55 | 41 | 96 | 8.5 | 6.3 | 14.8 | ||
₩1,000,000–₩2,000,000 | 54 | 59 | 113 | 8.4 | 9.1 | 17.5 | ||
₩2,000,000–₩3,000,000 | 90 | 73 | 163 | 13.9 | 11.3 | 25.2 | ||
₩3,000,000–₩10,000,000 | 98 | 80 | 178 | 15.1 | 12.4 | 27.5 | ||
₩10,000,000 or above | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.4 | ||
Marital Status | Single Married | 158 | 161 | 319 327 | 24.5 | 24.9 | 49.4 50.6 | 0.06 |
174 | 153 | 26.9 | 23.7 | |||||
Grocery App User/Non-user | User Non-user | 332 314 | 51.4 49.6 | |||||
Construct | Indicator | Std. Estimate | Mean | Cronbach’s α | AVE | CR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Utilitarian motive | Ut1 | 0.790 | 3.599 | 0.871 | 0.583 | 0.847 |
Ut2 | 0.844 | |||||
Ut3 | 0.690 | |||||
Ut4 | 0.666 | |||||
Hedonic motive | He1 | 0.924 | 3.131 | 0.908 | 0.798 | 0.940 |
He2 | 0.818 | |||||
He3 | 0.912 | |||||
He4 | 0.918 | |||||
Experiential motive | Ex1 | 0.240 | 3.036 | 0.858 | 0.653 | 0.849 |
Ex2 | 0.419 | |||||
Ex3 | 0.409 | |||||
Attitudes | At1 | 0.816 | 3.445 | 0.918 | 0.683 | 0.915 |
At2 | 0.787 | |||||
At3 | 0.888 | |||||
At4 | 0.737 | |||||
At5 | 0.787 | |||||
Subject norm | Su1 | 0.374 | 3.228 | 0.814 | 0.583 | 0.807 |
Su2 | 0.455 | |||||
Su3 | 0.365 | |||||
Behavioral control | Bc1 | 0.855 | 2.582 | 0.861 | 0.589 | 0.846 |
Bc2 | 0.874 | |||||
Bc3 | 0.586 | |||||
Bc4 | 0.688 | |||||
Behavioral intention | Bi1 | 0.798 | 3.561 | 0.876 | 0.618 | 0.865 |
Bi2 | 0.870 | |||||
Bi3 | 0.756 | |||||
Bi4 | 0.642 | |||||
Purchase behavior | Pb1 | 0.843 | 2.647 | 0.758 | 0.528 | 0.762 |
Pb2 | 0.509 | |||||
Pb3 | 0.884 | |||||
KMO (Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin) | 0.955 | |||||
Bartlett’s test of sphericity | Chi-Square | 15,425.328 | ||||
df (p) | 435 (0.000) |
Ut | He | Ex | At | Su | Bc | Bi | Pb | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ut | 1 | |||||||
He | 0.802 | 1 | ||||||
Ex | 0.884 | 0.861 | 1 | |||||
At | 0.928 | 0.807 | 0.927 | 1 | ||||
Su | 0.771 | 0.7 | 0.809 | 0.869 | 1 | |||
Bc | 0.065 | 0.246 | 0.267 | 0.124 | 0.336 | 1 | ||
Bi | 0.811 | 0.655 | 0.771 | 0.862 | 0.803 | 0.126 | 1 | |
Pb | 0.668 | 0.497 | 0.613 | 0.636 | 0.599 | 0.094 | 0.618 | 1 |
Mean | 3.599 | 3.131 | 3.036 | 3.445 | 3.228 | 2.582 | 3.561 | 2.647 |
SD | 0.829 | 0.886 | 0.935 | 0.809 | 0.812 | 0.838 | 0.814 | 0.961 |
Variables | Collinearity Statistics | Collinearity Diagnostics | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tolerance | VIF | Eigenvalue | Condition Index | |
Utilitarian motive | 0.490 | 2.039 | 0.051 | 8.781 |
Hedonic motive | 0.289 | 3.462 | 0.018 | 12.902 |
Experiential motive | 0.315 | 3.172 | 0.014 | 14.655 |
Attitudes | 0.461 | 2.169 | 0.036 | 10.490 |
Subject norm | 0.317 | 3.159 | 0.032 | 11.148 |
Behavioral control | 0.580 | 1.724 | 0.037 | 8.940 |
Purchase intention | 0.913 | 1.095 | 0.023 | 11.374 |
Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | p-Value | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | Ut -> At | 0.511 | 0.184 | 3.004 | ** | Supported |
H2 | He -> At | −0.063 | 0.176 | −0.511 | 0.621 | Rejected |
H3 | Ex -> At | 0.302 | 0.178 | 2.413 | 0.391 | Rejected |
H4 | At -> Bi | 0.684 | 0.055 | 13.118 | *** | Supported |
H5 | Su -> Bi | 0.098 | 0.036 | 3.511 | *** | Supported |
H6 | Bc -> Bi | −0.008 | 0.033 | −0.229 | 0.606 | Rejected |
H7 | Bc -> Pb | 0.064 | 0.049 | 1.309 | 0.398 | Rejected |
H8 | Bi -> Pb | 0.475 | 0.104 | 6.621 | *** | Supported |
Groups | Mean | SD | F | p | R2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Utilitarian motive | Users | 3.6850 | 0.83180 | 7.189 ** | 0.008 | 0.011 |
Nonusers | 3.5110 | 0.81763 | ||||
Hedonic motive | Users | 3.2179 | 0.88297 | 6.469 * | 0.011 | 0.010 |
Nonusers | 3.0415 | 0.88045 | ||||
Experiential motive | Users | 3.1019 | 0.90545 | 3.343 | 0.068 | 0.005 |
Nonusers | 2.9676 | 0.90545 | ||||
Attitude | Users | 3.5523 | 0.78227 | 11.949 ** | 0.001 | 0.018 |
Nonusers | 3.3342 | 0.82145 | ||||
Subjective norms | Users | 3.2834 | 0.77311 | 3.142 | 0.077 | 0.005 |
Nonusers | 3.1703 | 0.84710 | ||||
Perceived behavioral control | Users | 2.8247 | 0.66373 | 0.001 | 0.981 | 0.000 |
Nonusers | 2.8234 | 0.69186 | ||||
Behavioral intention | Users | 3.6208 | 0.80328 | 3.569 | 0.059 | 0.006 |
Nonusers | 3.5000 | 0.82178 | ||||
Behavior | Users | 2.7032 | 0.99565 | 2.199 | 0.139 | 0.003 |
Nonusers | 2.5912 | 0.92331 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, H. Use of Mobile Grocery Shopping Application: Motivation and Decision-Making Process among South Korean Consumers. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 2672-2693. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16070147
Kim H. Use of Mobile Grocery Shopping Application: Motivation and Decision-Making Process among South Korean Consumers. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2021; 16(7):2672-2693. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16070147
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Hyungjoon. 2021. "Use of Mobile Grocery Shopping Application: Motivation and Decision-Making Process among South Korean Consumers" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 16, no. 7: 2672-2693. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16070147
APA StyleKim, H. (2021). Use of Mobile Grocery Shopping Application: Motivation and Decision-Making Process among South Korean Consumers. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(7), 2672-2693. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16070147