Psychological Traits and Intention to Use E-Commerce among Rural Micro-Entrepreneurs in Malaysia
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. The Context of the Study
2.2. Need of Achievement
2.3. Risk-Taking Propensity
2.4. Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
4.1. Characteristics of Demographics
4.2. Results of Measurement Model
4.2.1. Loading and Cross-Loading
4.2.2. Convergent Validity
4.2.3. Discriminant Validity
4.3. Structural Model Result
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Motta, V. Lack of access to external finance and SME labor productivity: Does project quality matter? Small Bus. Econ. 2020, 54, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Park, S.; Lee, I.H.; Kim, J.E. Government support and small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME) performance: The moderating effects of diagnostic and support services. Asian Bus. Manag. 2020, 19, 213–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Statistics, D.O. Economic Census 2011 Profile of Small Medium Enterprise; Department of Statistics: Purtajaya, Malaysia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
 - Bin Yusoff, M. (Ed.) The Utilisation of the Government Business Support Services: The Senior Adviser Perspectives; Universiti Malaysia Kelantan: Kelantan, Malaysia, 2010; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
 - Yusoff, M.N.H.B.; Zainol, F.A.; Ismail, M.; Redzuan, R.H.; Abdul Rahim Merican, R.M.; Razik, M.A.; Afthanorhan, A. The Role of Government Financial Support Programmes, Risk-Taking Propensity, and Self-Confidence on Propensity in Business Ventures. Sustainability 2021, 13, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Dvouletý, O. Can policy makers count with positive impact of entrepreneurship on economic development of the Czech regions? J. Entrep. Emerg. Econ. 2017, 9, 286–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - David, F.; Enrique, G.; Julia, L.; Julian, P.; Alvin, S.; Jamie, W.; Tim, W. Business Development and the Growth of Rural SMEs; OECD: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
 - Rural Development Policy. 2019. Available online: https://www.pmo.gov (accessed on 1 July 2019).
 - Price, L.; Shutt, J.; Sellick, J. Supporting rural Small and Medium-sized Enterprises to take up broadband-enabled technology: What works? Local Econ. 2018, 33, 515–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Bin Yusoff, M.N.H.; Al Mamun, A.; Ibrahim, M.D.; Hassan, H. Measuring and Comparing Functional Business Skills and Knowledge among Asnaf Community in Malaysia. Econ. Sociol. 2018, 11, 229–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Bartosik-Purgat, M. Digital Marketing Communication from the Perspective of Individual Consumers: A Cross-Country Comparison. Entrep. Bus. Econ. Rev. 2019, 7, 205–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Shah, A.U.M.; Safri, S.N.A.; Thevadas, R.; Noordin, N.K.; Rahman, A.A.; Sekawi, Z.; Ideris, A.; Sultan, M.T.H. COVID-19 outbreak in Malaysia: Actions taken by the Malaysian government. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 97, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Thuy Dam Luong, H.; Huy Khanh, N.; Nguyen, H.T. Towards an economic recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical study on electronic commerce adoption of small and medium enterprises in Vietnam. Manag. Mark. 2021, 16, 47–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Irhas, E.M.; Dyah, S.; Yuni, I. Social Media Adoption in SMEs Impacted by COVID-19: The TOE Model. J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus. 2020, 7, 915–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Saffu, K.; Walker, J.H.; Mazurek, M. Perceived Strategic Value and e-Commerce Adoption among SMEs in Slovakia. J. Internet Commer. 2012, 11, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Wei-Loon, K.; Nurul Afiqah, S. The Motivation to Adopt E-commerce Among Malaysian Entrepreneurs. Organ. Mark. Emerg. Econ. 2020, 11, 189–202. [Google Scholar]
 - Majid, N.A.; Zainol, F.A.; Wan Daud, W.N.; Afthanorhan, A. Cooperative entrepreneurship in malaysian secondary schools: A review of current practices. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2019, 5, 812–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
 - Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M. Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behaviour. MIS Q. 2000, 24, 115–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Gefen, D.; Straub, D. The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2000, 1, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Kim, S.Y.; Lim, Y.J. Consumers’ Perceived Importance of and Satisfaction with Internet Shopping. Electron. Mark. 2001, 11, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Koufaris, M. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 2002, 13, 205–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Asmy, M.; Hassanudin, M.; Anwar, A. Modeling crowdfunders’ behavioral intention to adopt the crowdfunding-waqf model (CWM) in Malaysia: The theory of the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Islamic Middle East. Financ. Manag. 2018, 11, 231–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Do, B.; Dadvari, A.; Moslehpour, M. Exploring the mediation effect of social media acceptance on the relationship between entrepreneurial personality and entrepreneurial intention. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2020, 10, 3801–3810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Rahman, S.A.; Taghizadeh, S.K.; Ramayah, T.; Alam, M.M.D. Technology acceptance among micro-entrepreneurs in marginalized social strata: The case of social innovation in Bangladesh. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2017, 118, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Fayad, R.; Paper, D. The Technology Acceptance Model E-Commerce Extension: A Conceptual Framework. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2015, 26, 1000–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Turner, M.; Kitchenham, B.; Brereton, P.; Charters, S.; Budgen, D. Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2010, 52, 463–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Raza, S.A.; Amna, U.; Nida, S. New determinants of ease of use and perceived usefulness for mobile banking adoption. Int. J. Electron. Cust. Relatsh. Manag. 2017, 11, 44–65. [Google Scholar]
 - Hanafizadeh, P.; Behboudi, M.; Abedini, K.; Marziyeh, J. Mobile-banking adoption by Iranian bank clients. Telemat. Inform. 2014, 31, 62–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Yi-Hsuan, L.; Yi-Chuan, H.; Hsu, C.-N. Adding Innovation Diffusion Theory to the Technology Acceptance Model: Supporting Employees’ Intentions to use E-Learning Systems. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2011, 14, 124–137. [Google Scholar]
 - Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Davis, D.F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of informaton technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Kessler, A.; Korunka, C.; Frank, H.; Lueger, M. Predicting founding success and new venture survival: A longitudinal nascent entrepreneurship approach. J. Enterprising Cult. 2012, 20, 25–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Collins, C.J.; Hanges, P.J.; Locke, E.A. The Relationship of Achievement Motivation to Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Hum. Perform. 2004, 17, 95–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Antoncic, B.; Bratkovic Kregar, T.; Singh, G.; DeNoble, A.F. The Big Five Personality–Entrepreneurship Relationship: Evidence from Slovenia. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2015, 53, 819–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Astebro, T.; Herz, H.; Nanda, R.; Weber, R.A. Seeking the Roots of Entrepreneurship: Insights from Behavioral Economics. J. Econ. Perspect. 2014, 28, 49–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Mirjana, P.B.; Ana, A.; Marjana, M.-S. Examining determinants of entrepreneurial intentions in Slovenia: Applying the theory of planned behaviour and an innovative cognitive style. Econ. Res. Ekon. Istraživanja 2018, 31, 1453–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Pihie, Z.A.L.; Bagheri, A. Self-Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Intention: The Mediation Effect of Self-Regulation. Vocat. Learn. 2013, 6, 385–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Brammer, S.; Hoejmose, S.; Marchant, K. Environmental Management in SMEs in the UK: Practices, Pressures and Perceived Benefits. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2012, 21, 423–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Debrulle, J.; Maes, J.; Gardiner, E. How Entrepreneurs Think: Financial Decisions for the Long or Short Term. J. Bus. Strategy. [CrossRef]
 - Al Mamun, A.; Ekpe, I. Entrepreneurial traits and micro-enterprise performance: A study among women micro-entrepreneurs in Malaysia. Dev. Pract. 2016, 26, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Thapa, A. Determinants of microenterprise performance in Nepal. Small Bus. Econ. 2015, 45, 581–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - McClelland, D.C. N achievement and entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1965, 1, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Karaman, M.A.; Watson, J.C. Examining associations among achievement motivation, locus of control, academic stress, and life satisfaction: A comparison of U.S. and international undergraduate students. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2017, 111, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Singh, A.P.; Shrivastava, S. Effect of Need for Achievement on the Job Performance-Job Satisfaction Relationship. Indian J. Ind. Relat. 1983, 18, 437–442. [Google Scholar]
 - Handrito Radityo, P.; Slabbinck, H.; Vanderstraeten, J. Enjoying or refraining from risk? The impact of implicit need for achievement and risk perception on SME internationalization. Cross Cult. Strateg. Manag. 2020, 27, 317–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Isaga, N. The relationship of personality to cognitive characteristics and SME performance in Tanzania. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2018, 25, 667–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Jeffcoate, J.; Chappell, C.; Feindt, S. Best practice in SME adoption of e-commerce. Benchmarking: Int. J. 2002, 9, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Poon, S.; Swatman Paula, M.C. Small business use of the Internet: Findings from Australian case studies. Int. Mark. Rev. 1997, 14, 385–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Karabulut, A.T. Personality Traits on Entrepreneurial Intention. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 229, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Gürol, Y.; Atsan, N. Entrepreneurial characteristics amongst university students. Educ. Train. 2006, 48, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - van der Zwan, P.; Thurik, R.; Verheul, I.; Hessels, J. Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. Eurasian Bus. Rev. 2016, 6, 273–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Salleh, F.; Ibrahim, M.D. Demographic characteristics differences of risk taking propensity among micro and small business owners in Malaysia. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2011, 2, 149–153. [Google Scholar]
 - Pratono, A.H. Does firm performance increase with risk-taking behavior under information technological turbulence? Empirical evidence from Indonesian SMEs. J. Risk Financ. 2018, 19, 362–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Angela, R.; Irina, B.; Cristina, C. What drives the creation of new businesses? A Panel-Data analysis for EU Countries. Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade 2018, 54, 508–536. [Google Scholar]
 - Zhaoyang, G.; Wei, J. Risk-taking for entrepreneurial new entry: Risk-taking dimensions and contingencies. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2019, 16, 739–781. [Google Scholar]
 - Zahra, S.A. Entrepreneurial Risk Taking in Family Firms: The Wellspring of the Regenerative Capability. Fam. Bus. Rev. 2018, 31, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Che Mat, Z.; Bin Yusoff, M.N.H.; Zainol, F.A.; Afthanorhan, A. Risk-taking propensity personality of women entrepreneurs in Malaysia. J. Crit. Rev. 2020, 6, 1214–1221. [Google Scholar]
 - McCarthy, D.J.; Puffer, S.M.; Lamin, A. Entrepreneurial orientation in a hostile and turbulent environment: Risk and innovativeness among successful Russian entrepreneurs. Eur. J. Int. Manag. 2018, 12, 191–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Antoncic, B. Risk taking in intrapreneurship: Translating the individual level risk aversion into the organizational risk taking. J. Enterprising Cult. 2003, 11, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Stewart Jr, W.H.; Roth, P.L. Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta-analytic review. J. Appl. Psychol. 2001, 86, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
 - Stevenson, H.; Gumpert, D. The heart of entrepreneurship. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1985, 63, 85–94. [Google Scholar]
 - Weng, F.; Yang, R.-J.; Ho, H.-J.; Su, H.-M. A TAM-Based Study of the Attitude towards Use Intention of Multimedia among School Teachers. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2018, 1, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Hashim Kamarul, F.; Tan Felix, B. Examining the determinant factors of perceived online community usefulness using the expectancy value model. J. Syst. Inf. Technol. 2018, 20, 152–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Heckert, T.M.; Cuneio, G.; Hannah, A.P.; Adams, P.J.; Droste, H.E.; Mueller, M.A.; Wallis, H.A.; Griffin, C.M.; Robert, L.L. Creation of a New Needs Assessment Questionnaire. J. Soc. Behav. Personal. 2000, 15, 121. [Google Scholar]
 - Langkamp Bolton, D.; Lane, M.D. Individual entrepreneurial orientation: Development of a measurement instrument. Educ. Train. 2012, 54, 219–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Pikkarainen, T.; Pikkarainen, K.; Karjaluoto, H.; Pahnila, S. Consumer acceptance of online banking: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Res. 2004, 14, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Pavlou, P.A. Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2003, 7, 101–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Krejcie, V.R.; Morgan, W.D. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1970, 30, 607–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Henseler, J.; Christian, R.M.; Sinkovics, R.R. The use of partial least squares path modelling in international marketing. New Chall. Int. Mark. Adv. Int. Mark. 2009, 20, 277–319. [Google Scholar]
 - Hair, F.J.; Ringle, M.C.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Hair, F.J.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective; Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc.: New Jersey, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
 - Chin, W.W. (Ed.) How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses; Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
 - Sebora, T.C.; Lee, S.M.; Sukasame, N. Critical success factors for e-commerce entrepreneurship: An empirical study of Thailand. Small Bus. Econ. 2009, 32, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Forlani, D.; Mullins, J.W. Perceived risks and choices in entrepreneurs’ new venture decisions. J. Bus. Ventur. 2000, 15, 305–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Li, Y.; Ahlstrom, D. Risk-taking in entrepreneurial decision-making: A dynamic model of venture decision. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 2020, 37, 899–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Hsu, C.-W.; Yeh, C.-C. Understanding the critical factors for successful M-commerce adoption. Int. J. Mob. Commun. 2017, 16, 50–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 - Lestari, D. Measuring e-commerce adoption behaviour among gen-Z in Jakarta, Indonesia. Econ. Anal. Policy 2019, 64, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
 



| Particular | N | % | 
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Man | 134 | 44.4 | 
| Women | 168 | 55.6 | 
| Marital Status | ||
| Single | 33 | 10.9 | 
| Married | 265 | 87.7 | 
| Widowed | 4 | 1.3 | 
| Age | ||
| <20 years old | 57 | 18.9 | 
| 21 to 31 years old | 12 | 4.0 | 
| 32 to 41 years old | 101 | 33.4 | 
| 42 to 51 years old | 76 | 25.2 | 
| 52 to 61 years old | 43 | 14.2 | 
| Over 61 years old | 12 | 4.0 | 
| Education Level | ||
| Never attended school | 5 | 1.7 | 
| Primary School | 11 | 3.6 | 
| Secondary School | 172 | 57.0 | 
| Diploma | 90 | 29.8 | 
| Undergraduate Degree | 18 | 6.0 | 
| Master’s Degree | 4 | 1.3 | 
| Type of Business | ||
| Manufacturing | 21 | 7.0 | 
| Services | 281 | 93.0 | 
| Form of Business | ||
| Sole Proprietorship | 262 | 86.8 | 
| Partnership | 6 | 2.0 | 
| Private Limited | 34 | 11.3 | 
| Tenure | ||
| Less than 1 year | 2 | 0.7 | 
| 1–6 years | 86 | 28.5 | 
| 7–11 years | 98 | 32.5 | 
| 12–16 years | 66 | 21.9 | 
| 17–21 years | 28 | 9.3 | 
| More than 21 years | 22 | 7.3 | 
| Number of Employees | ||
| 0–5 persons | 280 | 92.7 | 
| 6–20 persons | 22 | 7.3 | 
| INT | N of Ach | PercEU | PUF | RTP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTN1 | 0.943 | 0.637 | 0.744 | 0.689 | 0.609 | 
| INTN2 | 0.949 | 0.614 | 0.737 | 0.652 | 0.564 | 
| INTN3 | 0.959 | 0.657 | 0.803 | 0.708 | 0.594 | 
| INTN4 | 0.950 | 0.640 | 0.756 | 0.685 | 0.569 | 
| N of Ach1 | 0.533 | 0.812 | 0.476 | 0.703 | 0.568 | 
| N of Ach2 | 0.596 | 0.833 | 0.558 | 0.713 | 0.623 | 
| N of Ach3 | 0.536 | 0.822 | 0.530 | 0.682 | 0.603 | 
| N of Ach4 | 0.548 | 0.824 | 0.530 | 0.722 | 0.665 | 
| N of Ach5 | 0.579 | 0.875 | 0.586 | 0.751 | 0.717 | 
| PercEU1 | 0.700 | 0.531 | 0.881 | 0.571 | 0.528 | 
| PercEU2 | 0.671 | 0.509 | 0.862 | 0.587 | 0.518 | 
| PercEU3 | 0.727 | 0.598 | 0.890 | 0.645 | 0.555 | 
| PercEU4 | 0.696 | 0.607 | 0.861 | 0.647 | 0.585 | 
| PUF1 | 0.577 | 0.716 | 0.547 | 0.789 | 0.620 | 
| PUF2 | 0.618 | 0.745 | 0.602 | 0.868 | 0.727 | 
| PUF3 | 0.585 | 0.664 | 0.561 | 0.796 | 0.677 | 
| PUF4 | 0.628 | 0.746 | 0.630 | 0.871 | 0.709 | 
| PUF5 | 0.602 | 0.713 | 0.595 | 0.856 | 0.686 | 
| RTP1 | 0.482 | 0.620 | 0.466 | 0.625 | 0.776 | 
| RTP2 | 0.509 | 0.607 | 0.543 | 0.636 | 0.806 | 
| RTP3 | 0.511 | 0.659 | 0.524 | 0.737 | 0.856 | 
| RTP4 | 0.509 | 0.620 | 0.519 | 0.680 | 0.845 | 
| RTP5 | 0.516 | 0.638 | 0.524 | 0.683 | 0.830 | 
| Construct | Label | Std Loading | CR | AVE | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intention | Int1 | 0.943 | 0.974 | 0.903 | 
| Int2 | 0.949 | |||
| Int3 | 0.959 | |||
| Int4 | 0.950 | |||
| Need of Achievement | Na1 | 0.812 | 0.919 | 0.695 | 
| Na2 | 0.833 | |||
| Na3 | 0.822 | |||
| Na4 | 0.824 | |||
| Na5 | 0.875 | |||
| Perceived Ease of Use | PercEU1 | 0.881 | 0.928 | 0.763 | 
| PercEU2 | 0.862 | |||
| PercEU3 | 0.890 | |||
| PercEU4 | 0.861 | |||
| Perceived Usefulness | PUF1 | 0.789 | 0.921 | 0.700 | 
| PUF2 | 0.868 | |||
| PUF3 | 0.796 | |||
| PUF4 | 0.871 | |||
| PUF5 | 0.856 | |||
| Risk Taking | RTP1 | 0.776 | 0.913 | 0.677 | 
| RTP2 | 0.806 | |||
| RTP3 | 0.856 | |||
| RTP4 | 0.845 | |||
| RTP5 | 0.830 | 
| INT | N of Ach | PercEU | PUF | RTP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INT | 0.950 | ||||
| N of Ach | 0.670 | 0.834 | |||
| PercEU | 0.800 | 0.644 | 0.874 | ||
| PUF | 0.720 | 0.857 | 0.702 | 0.837 | |
| RTP | 0.614 | 0.764 | 0.626 | 0.818 | 0.823 | 
| Hypothesis | Regression Path | Standardized Estimates | t-Value | p-Value | Hypotheses Supported | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | N of Ach_ -> PUF | 0.486 | 10.024 | 0.000 | Yes | 
| H2 | N of Ach_ -> PercEU | 0.398 | 6.234 | 0.000 | Yes | 
| H3 | RTP -> PUF | 0.334 | 6.959 | 0.000 | Yes | 
| H4 | RTP -> PercEU | 0.322 | 5.513 | 0.000 | Yes | 
| H5 | PUF -> INT | 0.311 | 4.941 | 0.000 | Yes | 
| H6 | PercEU -> PUF | 0.180 | 4.694 | 0.000 | Yes | 
| H7 | PercEU -> INT | 0.582 | 9.758 | 0.000 | Yes | 
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.  | 
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yusoff, M.N.H.B.; Zainol, F.A.; Hafifi Ridzuan, R.; Ismail, M.; Afthanorhan, A. Psychological Traits and Intention to Use E-Commerce among Rural Micro-Entrepreneurs in Malaysia. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 1827-1843. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050102
Yusoff MNHB, Zainol FA, Hafifi Ridzuan R, Ismail M, Afthanorhan A. Psychological Traits and Intention to Use E-Commerce among Rural Micro-Entrepreneurs in Malaysia. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2021; 16(5):1827-1843. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050102
Chicago/Turabian StyleYusoff, Mohd Nor Hakimin Bin, Fakhrul Anwar Zainol, Razman Hafifi Ridzuan, Mohammad Ismail, and Asyraf Afthanorhan. 2021. "Psychological Traits and Intention to Use E-Commerce among Rural Micro-Entrepreneurs in Malaysia" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 16, no. 5: 1827-1843. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050102
APA StyleYusoff, M. N. H. B., Zainol, F. A., Hafifi Ridzuan, R., Ismail, M., & Afthanorhan, A. (2021). Psychological Traits and Intention to Use E-Commerce among Rural Micro-Entrepreneurs in Malaysia. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(5), 1827-1843. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050102
        
