Topic Editors

Department of Education, Languages, Intercultural Studies, Literatures and Psychology (FORLILPSI), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Instituto Internacional de Estudios del Caribe, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, Cartagena, Colombia
Arts in Territorial Development and Public Management, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, Cartagena, Colombia

Socio-Ecological Systems, Environmental Awareness, and Sustainable Environmental Education

Abstract submission deadline
31 October 2026
Manuscript submission deadline
31 December 2026
Viewed by
4959

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Sustainability has become ubiquitous, yet its operational meaning remains elusive. The classic maxim—meeting present needs without compromising those of future generations in harmony with nature—offers a guiding horizon but insufficient traction within socio-economic systems shaped since modernity and the industrial revolution. The environmental, social, and economic pillars are entangled with enduring asymmetries of power, commodification of nature, and growth imperatives that generate contradictions on the ground.

Conceptual clarity improves when sustainability is examined through the lens of extractivism. Along a continuum from subsistence practices oriented to community reproduction among traditional peoples to colonial and capitalist extractivism organized around exploitation and perpetual accumulation, we observe markedly different socio-ecological outcomes. In Latin America, this debate intersects with a distinctive cultural dimension, namely Buen Vivir (“Living Well”), rooted in Indigenous worldviews that foreground reciprocity, solidarity, dignity, and the recognition of nature as a living subject rather than a mere resource. Although policy experiments inspired by Buen Vivir have faced political–economic headwinds, the paradigm endures as an ethical–political horizon for reimagining development, forest governance, and climate action, where Indigenous peoples often act as forest guardians against overexploitation and commodification.

This Special Issue invites the submission of contributions that integrate socio-ecological systems (SESs), environmental awareness, and sustainability education, closing persistent gaps between strands of scholarship that have often proceeded in parallel. We welcome theoretical syntheses, methodological advances, and empirical studies that illuminate how educational processes shape awareness, how awareness supports equitable SES management, and how cultural frames—from Indigenous and local ecological knowledge to urban commons—mediate these dynamics across scales.

We particularly encourage work that proposes conceptual frameworks linking SESs, awareness, and education; evaluates education programs and their effects on pro-environmental behavior; analyzes SES degradation and differentiated impacts on urban, rural, and ethnic communities; examines adaptive governance and co-management arrangements; mobilizes innovative methods such as citizen science, experiential learning, and digital pedagogies; identifies psychological, social, and structural barriers to awareness; integrates education for sustainable development in formal and non-formal contexts; and connects socio-ecological resilience, social capital, and community education. Policy analyses, case studies, mixed-methods designs, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses are welcome to be submitted.

By foregrounding culture, education, and governance alongside biophysical constraints, this Special Issue aims to showcase evidence and frameworks that inform both scholarly debate and practical action, advancing just and context-sensitive sustainability transitions in a world of many worlds.

Prof. Dr. Giovanna Campani
Dr. Davide Riccardi
Prof. Dr. Francisco Javier Maza-Avila
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • sustainability
  • socio-ecological systems (SESs)
  • environmental awareness
  • sustainability education
  • extractivism
  • buen vivir (living well)
  • indigenous and local knowledge
  • resilience
  • sustainability transitions
  • sustainable development
  • local and traditional knowledge

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Social Sciences
socsci
2.0 3.5 2012 30.3 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Societies
societies
2.2 3.8 2011 29.7 Days CHF 1600 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
38 pages, 7005 KB  
Article
Emergent Cooperation in Socio-Ecological Systems Under Resource Scarcity: An Agent-Based Analysis of Sustainability
by Angela Isabel Giraldo-Suárez, Yenith Cristina Ortiz-González and José Ignacio García-Valdecasas
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(8), 554; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15080554 - 17 Aug 2026
Viewed by 335
Abstract
A growing demand for resources that exceeds the capacity of the biophysical system to regenerate puts environmental resources under stress, and society faces uncertainties about their scarcity and climate change. In this context, understanding how interactions among environmental, social, and economic systems shape [...] Read more.
A growing demand for resources that exceeds the capacity of the biophysical system to regenerate puts environmental resources under stress, and society faces uncertainties about their scarcity and climate change. In this context, understanding how interactions among environmental, social, and economic systems shape behavioural responses becomes essential for explaining the emergence of sustainable socio-ecological dynamics. Therefore, this research explores how interactions among environmental, social, and economic systems influence sustainability outcomes, where emergent behaviours, including cooperation, reveal the interaction mechanisms connecting environmental, social and economic subsystems. A simulation model is built using the agent-based model method for this goal. The simulations suggest that scarcity may reinforce non-cooperative behaviours and generate lock-in dynamics that hinder transitions toward more sustainable system states. Additionally, cooperative behaviours emerge from the interactions among heterogeneous agents embedded within environmental, social, and economic subsystems, highlighting cooperation as a key mechanism connecting these subsystems and supporting more sustainable socio-ecological dynamics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 508 KB  
Article
Determinants of Youth Green Consumption in Rural South Africa: Moral Identity, Environmental Responsibility, and Locus of Control
by Ncumisa Makabeni and Herring Shava
Societies 2026, 16(3), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16030089 - 12 Mar 2026
Viewed by 1038
Abstract
This study examines whether moral identity, perceived environmental responsibility, and locus of control predict green consumption behaviour among young consumers. Adopting a quantitative approach, the study follows an explanatory research design grounded in the positivist paradigm. Primary data were collected through a self-administered [...] Read more.
This study examines whether moral identity, perceived environmental responsibility, and locus of control predict green consumption behaviour among young consumers. Adopting a quantitative approach, the study follows an explanatory research design grounded in the positivist paradigm. Primary data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire delivered to respondents aged 18–35 years. Descriptive statistics were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 30, while inferential analysis was conducted using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) via SmartPLS 4. The findings suggest that moral identity and perceived responsibility for environmental damage are significant predictors of green consumption among youth. In contrast, locus of control shows a weak, statistically insignificant association with green consumption behaviour. After controlling for demographic variables, including gender, age, race, education, occupation, and income, the results indicate that only education level and race make significant contributions to the model. Notably, the effect of moral identity becomes insignificant once demographic factors are considered, while locus of control remains insignificant. However, perceived environmental responsibility not only retains its significance but also demonstrates a strengthened effect on green consumption behaviour. These findings highlight the persistence of the attitude–behaviour gap in sustainable consumption among young consumers, particularly in rural contexts. The study contributes to the literature by extending the Theory of Planned Behaviour through the incorporation of moral and psychological constructs within a rural African setting. Practically, the study offers insights for policymakers, educators, and marketers, emphasising the importance of environmental education, moral reinforcement, and targeted behavioural interventions to enhance youth participation in sustainable consumption practices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1435 KB  
Article
Beyond Awareness and Enforcement: Governance and Infrastructure Constraints Shaping Illegal Dumping in Ngwelezana Township, South Africa
by Llewellyn Leonard and Nkosingiphile Khuluse
Soc. Sci. 2026, 15(3), 179; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15030179 - 11 Mar 2026
Viewed by 947
Abstract
Illegal dumping is a significant environmental and public health challenge in South African townships. This study investigates the drivers of illegal dumping in Ngwelezana Township, KwaZulu-Natal, using a qualitative case study approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with municipal officials, waste workers, [...] Read more.
Illegal dumping is a significant environmental and public health challenge in South African townships. This study investigates the drivers of illegal dumping in Ngwelezana Township, KwaZulu-Natal, using a qualitative case study approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with municipal officials, waste workers, and community stakeholders, supplemented by field observations and document analysis. Qualitative content analysis identified that dumping is driven by a misalignment between waste generation and service provision, characterized by ‘institutional incoherence’ and ‘constrained compliance.’ Specific drivers include weak enforcement capacity, inadequate municipal resources, high disposal and transport costs, and the availability of unmanaged open spaces. The findings suggest that current reactive clean-up approaches are insufficient to address the systemic nature of the problem. This study proposes a transition toward preventative, community-centred waste governance that prioritizes strategic resource allocation, infrastructure accessibility, and integrated spatial planning. By analyzing the intersection of governance, cost, and infrastructure, this research provides a framework for addressing waste mismanagement in comparable Global South contexts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 475 KB  
Article
Governing Market Risk in Organic Agriculture: Institutional Resilience and Collective Action in Rural Indonesia
by Putri Kartika, Rahmadanih, Imam Mujahidin Fahmid and Didi Rukmana
Societies 2026, 16(2), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16020075 - 22 Feb 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1501
Abstract
Why do some organic farming systems persist while others collapse despite similar histories of collective action, policy support, and social legitimacy? This study examines how institutional design shapes the resilience of organic rice systems under conditions of market volatility and buyer power. Drawing [...] Read more.
Why do some organic farming systems persist while others collapse despite similar histories of collective action, policy support, and social legitimacy? This study examines how institutional design shapes the resilience of organic rice systems under conditions of market volatility and buyer power. Drawing on a qualitative comparative analysis of two subnational cases in rural Indonesia—Magelang and Tasikmalaya—Magelang experienced only 6–8% reversion to conventional rice (≈4.2 ha lost), while Tasikmalaya saw 32–38% reversion (≈13–17 ha). The study applies and extends the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework to foreground market risk governance as a central explanatory variable. The findings show that sustainability depends less on collective organisation than on whether producer institutions function as risk-bearing actors. In Magelang, a farmer cooperative governed market relations through internal monopsony and buyer diversification, shifting market risk from individual households to the organisational level. In Tasikmalaya, reliance on an external monopsony concentrated risk outside producer control; when buyer demand weakened, risk was rapidly transferred to farmers, triggering institutional fragmentation and exit from organic production. By distinguishing internal from external monopsony, the study advances an institutional explanation of resilience in market-mediated sustainability transitions and suggests that policies should prioritise institutional capacity for market risk governance over certification or production technologies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop