Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (1)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = vegetated spur dike

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 5247 KB  
Article
Numerical Investigation of Flow Around Partially and Fully Vegetated Submerged Spur Dike
by Sohail Iqbal, Rizwan Haider, Ghufran Ahmed Pasha, Lun Zhao, Fakhar Muhammad Abbas, Naveed Anjum, Nadir Murtaza and Zeshan Abbas
Water 2025, 17(3), 435; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17030435 - 4 Feb 2025
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 3073
Abstract
This study investigates the role of emerged vegetation in enhancing the performance of submerged spur dikes for better flow control and bank protection in river systems. The research utilizes a numerical model based on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), validated with experimental data. After [...] Read more.
This study investigates the role of emerged vegetation in enhancing the performance of submerged spur dikes for better flow control and bank protection in river systems. The research utilizes a numerical model based on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), validated with experimental data. After validation, the study explores various configurations of vegetated spur dike, adjusting the submergence heights of the impermeable spur dike to achieve porosity ranging from fully impermeable to highly porous. Porosity levels of 24%, 48%, and 72% were chosen based on the spur dike height and the effectiveness of staggered vegetation arrangements in maximizing drag and reducing velocity. This approach aims to determine their impact on flow structure, velocity, and turbulence characteristics. The results reveal that impermeable dikes create strong recirculation zones downstream, increasing the potential for bank erosion. Introducing vegetation on the dike, particularly at moderate porosities (24% and 48%), effectively disrupts this behavior by reducing downstream velocity and mitigating mass and momentum exchange concentration between the spur dike field and the mainstream. However, the highest porosity case (72%) offered reduced flow resistance, limiting its protective effectiveness. Analysis of velocity and stress distributions showed that vegetation porosity significantly impacts normal and shear stresses, influencing flow stability at critical points around the spur dike. The findings signify the potential of integrating vegetation into spur dike designs to achieve a balance between effective flow conveyance and erosion control even in the spur dike submergence condition. This approach can outperform conventional emerged impermeable spur dikes, as supported by previous studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of porous and vegetated structures in reducing flow resistance, minimizing stagnation zones, and improving sediment deposition compared to impermeable designs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop