Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = vascular access site complication (VASC)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
9 pages, 589 KB  
Article
Midterm Outcome of Balloon-Expandable Covered Stenting of Femoral Access Site Complications
by András Szentiványi, Sarolta Borzsák, András Süvegh, Ákos Bérczi, Tamás Szűcsborús, Zoltán Ruzsa, Géza Fontos, Csaba Imre Szalay, Roland Papp, Levente Molnár and Csaba Csobay-Novák
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(21), 6550; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216550 - 31 Oct 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1535
Abstract
Background: Vascular access site complications (VASCs) after endovascular interventions requiring a large-bore access are frequent and known to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although balloon-expandable covered stents (BECSs) are increasingly used in such indications, their performance in this rather hostile [...] Read more.
Background: Vascular access site complications (VASCs) after endovascular interventions requiring a large-bore access are frequent and known to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although balloon-expandable covered stents (BECSs) are increasingly used in such indications, their performance in this rather hostile territory is currently unknown. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BECSs in common femoral artery (CFA) VASCs management. Methods: This is a national multicenter retrospective study of all patients who underwent BECS implantation of the CFA due to a VASCs after an endovascular procedure between January 2020 and May 2023 in major tertiary referral centers in Hungary. Operative data were collected and follow-up ultrasound examinations were performed. Our study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05220540) and followed the STROBE guidelines. Results: Of the 23 patients enrolled (13 females, mean age: 74.2 ± 8.6), technical success was achieved in 21 (91.3%) cases, with one perioperative death. After an average follow-up of 18.0 ± 11.4 months, another nine (39.1%) deaths occurred, and one was VASCs-associated. BECS occlusion was detected in one (4.3%) patient, being the only reintervention (4.3%) where revascularization was also achieved. Conclusions: Although BECS implantation for CFA VASCs is feasible with a relatively high technical success rate, the mortality rate is non-negligible. Until adequately evaluated, BECS implantation in such indications is to be used with caution, ideally only within the framework of a trial. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 949 KB  
Article
A Multicenter Retrospective Study Evaluating Distal Radial Access vs. Conventional Transradial or Transvenous Access for Endovascular Treatment of Malfunctioning Dialysis Fistulas
by Roberto Minici, Massimo Venturini, Giuseppe Guzzardi, Federico Fontana, Andrea Coppola, Filippo Piacentino, Marco Spinetta, Davide Costa, Maria Chiara Brunese, Pasquale Guerriero, Biagio Apollonio, MGJR Research Team, Nicola De Rosi, Raffaele Serra and Domenico Laganà
Life 2024, 14(11), 1382; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14111382 - 28 Oct 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2208
Abstract
Background: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of distal transradial access (dRA) for the endovascular management of malfunctioning dialysis fistulas. This study also compares dRA with conventional access techniques, such as proximal radial and transvenous access, focusing on technical [...] Read more.
Background: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of distal transradial access (dRA) for the endovascular management of malfunctioning dialysis fistulas. This study also compares dRA with conventional access techniques, such as proximal radial and transvenous access, focusing on technical success, clinical outcomes, and vascular access site complications (VASCs). Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted across four hospitals, including 292 patients treated between January 2019 and June 2024. Of these, 57 patients underwent dRA, and 235 received proximal radial or transvenous access. Key outcomes included technical success (successful completion of the procedure), clinical success (restoration of functional dialysis access), and complication rates. Data were collected on procedure times and complication profiles. Results: Technical success was achieved in 96.5% of patients undergoing dRA, compared to 98.3% in those receiving conventional access (p = 0.388). Clinical success was similar between groups (96.5% vs. 97%, p = 0.835). The overall complication rate was 10.5% for dRA and 8.5% for conventional access (p = 0.632). Cannulation time was longer for dRA (109.1 vs. 91.9 s, p < 0.001), but total procedure duration was comparable between the groups. No major complications were observed in either cohort, and improved post-procedure access flow rates were recorded in all patients. Conclusions: Distal transradial access is a feasible and effective approach for the endovascular management of malfunctioning dialysis fistulas, with outcomes comparable to conventional access techniques. It provides a safe alternative, particularly for patients with complex fistulas, while maintaining a low complication profile. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Ischemia and Heart Failure—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 672 KB  
Article
Efficacy and Safety of Axiostat® Hemostatic Dressing in Aiding Manual Compression Closure of the Femoral Arterial Access Site in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatments: A Preliminary Clinical Experience in Two Centers
by Roberto Minici, Raffaele Serra, Claudio Maglia, Giuseppe Guzzardi, Marco Spinetta, Federico Fontana, Massimo Venturini and Domenico Laganà
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(5), 812; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050812 - 11 May 2023
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4643
Abstract
Background: Hemostasis of the femoral arterial access site by manual compression or a vascular closure device is critical to the safe completion of any endovascular procedure. Previous investigations evaluated the hemostatic efficacy at the radial access site of some chitosan-based hemostatic pads. This [...] Read more.
Background: Hemostasis of the femoral arterial access site by manual compression or a vascular closure device is critical to the safe completion of any endovascular procedure. Previous investigations evaluated the hemostatic efficacy at the radial access site of some chitosan-based hemostatic pads. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of a new chitosan-based hemostatic dressing, namely Axiostat®, in aiding manual compression closure of the femoral arterial access site in patients undergoing endovascular treatments. Furthermore, the outcomes were compared with evidence on manual compression alone and vascular closure devices. Methods: This investigation is a two-center retrospective analysis of 120 consecutive patients who had undergone, from July 2022 to February 2023, manual compression closure of the femoral arterial access site aided by the Axiostat® hemostatic dressing. Endovascular procedures performed with introducer sheaths ranging from 4 Fr to 8 Fr were evaluated. Results: Primary technical success was achieved in 110 (91.7%) patients, with adequate hemostasis obtained in all cases of prolonged manual compression requirements. The mean time-to-hemostasis and time-to-ambulation were 8.9 (±3.9) and 462 (±199) minutes, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 113 (94.2%) patients, with bleeding-related complications noted in 7 (5.8%) patients. Conclusions: Manual compression aided by the Axiostat® hemostatic dressing is effective and safe in achieving hemostasis of the femoral arterial access site in patients undergoing endovascular treatment with a 4–8 Fr introducer sheath. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vascular Repair and Remodeling in Health and Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop