Search Results (4)

In previous studies, a new methodology was developed to determine the free dispersive and polar energies, the surface energies, and Lewis acid–base parameters of a polystyrene–divinylbenzene (S-DVB) copolymer modified by melamine, 5-Hydroxy-6-methyluracil, and 5-fluouracil. In this paper, we were interested in the determination of the work of the adhesion of solvents on the modified copolymer as a function of temperature and for the different modifiers with the help of inverse gas chromatography at infinite dilution. The variations in the London dispersive and polar surface properties of copolymers against the temperature led to the determination of the different acid–base components of their surface energies. Using Fowkes’s equation, van Oss’s relation, and Owens’s concept, we obtained the variations in the dispersive and polar works of the adhesion of the different solid surfaces, and the corresponding forces of interaction between the organic solvents and the modified copolymer. It was shown that the work of adhesion is a function of two thermodynamic variables: the temperature and the modifier percentage. Full article

The most popular contact angle (CA)-based approaches for determination of solid surface free energy (SFE) are considered: (i) single liquid methods, mainly of Neumann and Chibowski, (ii) the multiple liquids approach of Owens–Wendt–Rabel–Kaelble (OWRK), and (iii) van Oss-Chaudhury–Good (vOCG) acid–base model. Evaluations based on Neumann and Chibowski models agree between each other. Under the assumption of equilibrium “wet wetting” (i.e., presence of saturated precursor film ahead of the drop), the model of Chibowski transforms in Lipatov’s interfacial equilibrium rule, i.e., the Antonow rule derived for the ternary point solid–liquid–gas. Very good agreement is observed between single and multiple liquids models where OWRK/vOCG values can be viewed as a mean of the individual SFE adopted by the solid with each of the wetting probes. Both approaches (single and multiple liquids) can be used in conjunction to evaluate SFE dispersion and polar components and to elucidate hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity. The implementation of apparently fully non-polar liquids (diiodomethane, bromonaphthalene) in OWRK and vOCG is practically and theoretically suspect. CA-based estimates represent apparent SFE determined by the interactions of both the solid surface and the probing liquid, which are very useful to elucidate the energy, chemistry and dynamics of the solid surface. Full article

The key goal of this study was to characterize surface properties of chosen dental materials on the base on the contact angle measurements and surface free energy calculations. Tested materials were incubated in the simulated oral environment and drinks to estimate an influence of conditions similar to those in the oral cavity on wetting and energetic state of the surface. Types of materials were as follows: denture acrylic resins, composite and PET-G dental retainer to compare basic materials used in a prosthetics, restorative dentistry and orthodontics. The sessile drop method was used to measure the contact angle with the use of several liquids. Values of the surface free energies were estimated based on the Owens–Wendt, van Oss–Chaudhury–Good and Zisman’s methods. The research showed that surface wetting depends on the material composition and storage conditions. The most significance changes of CA were observed for acrylic resins (84.7° ± 3.8° to 65.5° ± 3.5°) and composites (58.8° ± 4.1° to 49.1° ± 5.7°) stored in orange juice, and for retainers (81.9° ± 1.8° to 99.6° ± 4.5°) incubated in the saline solution. An analysis of the critical surface energy showed that acrylic materials are in the zone of good adhesion (values above 40 mJ/m²), while BIS-GMA composites are in the zone of poor adhesion (values below 30 mJ/m²). Study of the surface energy of different dental materials may contribute to the development of the thermodynamic model of bacterial adhesion, based on the surface free energies, and accelerate the investigation of biomaterial interaction in the biological environment. Full article

Poly(hydroxyurethane)s (PHU) are alternatives for conventional polyurethanes due to the use of bis-cyclic dicarbonates and diamines instead of harmful and toxic isocyanates. However, the surface properties of poly(hydroxyurethane)s are not well known. In this work, we focus on the analysis of the surface properties of poly(hydroxyurethane) coatings. Poly(hydroxyurethane)s were obtained by a catalyst-free method from commercially available carbonated diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (Epidian 6 epoxy resins) and various diamines: ethylenediamine, trimethylenediamine, putrescine, hexamethylenediamine, 2,2,4(2,4,4)-trimethyl-1,6-hexanediamine, m-xylylenediamine, 1,8-diamino-3,6-dioxaoctane, 4,7,10-trioxa-1,13-tridecanediamine, and isophorone diamine, using a non-isocyanate route. The structures of the obtained polymers were confirmed by FT-IR, ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analyses were performed. The rheological characteristic of the obtained polymers is presented. The static contact angles of water, diidomethane, and formamide, deposited on PHU coatings, were measured. From the measured contact angles, the surface free energy was calculated using two different approaches: Owens–Wendt and van Oss–Chaudhury–Good. Moreover, the wetting envelopes of PHU coatings were plotted, which enables the prediction of the wetting effect of various solvents. The results show that in the investigated coatings, a mainly dispersive interaction occurs. Full article