Search Results (3)

Water and fertilizer are crucial in rice growth, with irrigation and fertilizer management exhibiting synergies. In a two-year field study conducted in Yiyang City, Hunan Province, we examined the impact of three irrigation strategies—wet-shallow irrigation (W1), flooding irrigation (W2), and the “thin, shallow, wet, dry irrigation” method (W3)—in combination with distinct fertilizer treatments (labeled F1, F2, F3, and F4, with nitrogen application rates of 0, 180, 225, and 270 kg ha⁻¹, respectively) on rice yield generation and water–fertilizer utilization patterns. The study employed Hybrid Rice Xin Xiang Liang you 1751 (XXLY1751) and Yue Liang you Mei Xiang Xin Zhan (YLYMXXZ) as representative rice cultivars. Key findings from the research include water, fertilizer, variety, and year treatments, which all significantly influenced the yield components of rice. Compared to W2, W1 in 2022 reduced the amount of irrigation water by 35.2%, resulting in a 42.0~42.8% increase in irrigation water productivity and a 25.7~25.9% increase in total water productivity. In 2023, similar improvements were seen. Specifically, compared with other treatments, the W1F3 treatment increased nitrogen uptake and harvest index by 1.4–7.7% and 5.9–7.7%, respectively. Phosphorus and potassium uptake also improved. The W1 treatment enhanced the uptake, accumulation, and translocation of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium nutrients throughout the rice growth cycle, increasing nutrient levels in the grains. When paired with the F3 fertilization approach, W1 treatment boosted yields and improved nutrient use efficiency. Consequently, combining W1 and F3 treatment emerged as this study’s optimal water–fertilizer management approach. By harnessing the combined effects of water and fertilizer management, we can ensure efficient resource utilization and maximize the productive potential of rice. Full article

For agricultural production, improving the rice harvest index (HI) through agricultural management practices is a major means to enhance water and N utilization efficiency and yield. Both irrigation regimes and nitrogen (N) rates are important aspects of agricultural management practices. However, it is unclear how the rice HI is affected by water and N. This study aimed to clarify the mechanism underlying the response of the rice HI to water and N, and to explore the most suitable water-saving and N reduction management practices to ensure yield. A two-year (2021~2022) field experiment was conducted on Mollisols in Northeast China. In this experiment, nine treatments were performed, involving three irrigation regimes (flooded irrigation, controlled irrigation, and “thin-shallow-wet-dry” irrigation) and three N rates (110, 99, and 88 kg/ha). The rice agronomic traits and transfer of photoassimilates under different water and N management practices were observed and studied; rice HI, WUE, and the NUE of rice was calculated and analyzed. The highest HI was achieved under controlled irrigation with a 99 kg/ha N rate, at values of 0.622 and 0.621 in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Controlled irrigation (CI) with an appropriate reduction in the N rate increased the proportion of productive tillers, the transfer rate of dry matter and non-structural carbohydrates (NSCs), the sugar–spikelet ratio, the grain–leaf ratio, and the leaf area index (LAI) during the heading–flowering stage. A subsequent analysis indicated that the main reason for the increase in the HI was the increase in the sugar–spikelet ratio during the heading–flowering stage. A high HI increased the rice yield by increasing the thousand-grain weight. The present study suggested that water-saving irrigation regimes and appropriate N reduction not only led to water and fertilizer resource savings but also improved agronomic characteristics during rice growth and enhanced transport capacity. Thus, these practices improved the rice HI and have enormous potential for increasing yield. Therefore, regulating the rice HI through water and N management methods should be considered an important strategy for improving rice yield. Full article

The research on the effect of water-saving irrigation technology on the loss of nutrients and chemical substances in farmland has become a hot issue in the field of agricultural water and soil. Based on comparative experiments and combined with the isotope N¹⁵ tracer technique, the mechanism of nitrogen migration and transformation and the trend of fertilizer nitrogen use under different irrigation modes were studied. The results showed that water-saving irrigation modes (thin and wet irrigation W1 and intermittent irrigation W2) could reduce the NO₃⁻-N leaching loss by reducing the water leakage amount and the NO₃⁻-N concentration, and effectively inhibit the leaching loss of fertilizer nitrogen. Compared with conventional irrigation (W0), the leaching loss amount of fertilizer nitrogen in W1 and W2 decreased by 62% and 64%, respectively. Under the same amount of fertilizer, water-saving irrigation mode can significantly reduce the total amount of ammonia (NH₃) volatilization and the proportion of NH₃ volatilization of fertilizer nitrogen in total NH₃ volatilization, and significantly increase the nitrogen uptake of rice plants. Meanwhile, water-saving irrigation mode can increase the total nitrogen content of paddy soil by 14.0% but reduce the residual rate of fertilizer nitrogen in soil by 14.6%. Moreover, crop nitrogen uptake can be significantly increased under water-saving irrigation. Compared with W0, the nitrogen fertilizer use rate of W1 and W2 increased by 5.0% and 9.7%, respectively. The research results can provide an important basis for controlling agricultural non-point source pollution, curbing the decline of soil fertility and deterioration of soil quality in paddy fields. Full article