Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = thermal acoustic particle velocity sensor

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 16660 KiB  
Article
Quantitative Analysis Method and Correction Algorithm Based on Directivity Beam Pattern for Mismatches between Sensitive Units of Acoustic Dyadic Sensors
by Lingmeng Yang, Zhezheng Zhu, Wangnan Chen, Chengchen Gao, Yilong Hao and Zhenchuan Yang
Sensors 2023, 23(12), 5709; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23125709 - 19 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1431
Abstract
Acoustic dyadic sensors (ADSs) are a new type of acoustic sensor with higher directivity than microphones and acoustic vector sensors, which has great application potential in the fields of sound source localization and noise cancellation. However, the high directivity of an ADS is [...] Read more.
Acoustic dyadic sensors (ADSs) are a new type of acoustic sensor with higher directivity than microphones and acoustic vector sensors, which has great application potential in the fields of sound source localization and noise cancellation. However, the high directivity of an ADS is seriously affected by the mismatches between its sensitive units. In this article, (1) a theoretical model of mixed mismatches was established based on the finite-difference approximation model of uniaxial acoustic particle velocity gradient and its ability to reflect the actual mismatches was proven by the comparison of theoretical and experimental directivity beam patterns of an actual ADS based on MEMS thermal particle velocity sensors. (2) Additionally, a quantitative analysis method based on directivity beam pattern was proposed to easily estimate the specific magnitude of the mismatches, which was proven to be useful for the design of ADSs to estimate the magnitudes of different mismatches of an actual ADS. (3) Moreover, a correction algorithm based on the theoretical model of mixed mismatches and quantitative analysis method was successfully demonstrated to correct several groups of simulated and measured beam patterns with mixed mismatches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 5935 KiB  
Article
Design and Optimization of Sensitivity Enhancement Package for MEMS-Based Thermal Acoustic Particle Velocity Sensor
by Wenhan Chang, Lingmeng Yang, Zhezheng Zhu, Zhenchuan Yang, Yilong Hao and Chengchen Gao
Sensors 2021, 21(13), 4337; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21134337 - 24 Jun 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3578
Abstract
In this paper, small-sized acoustic horns, the sensitivity enhancement package for the MEMS-based thermal acoustic particle velocity sensor, have been designed and optimized. Four kinds of acoustic horns, including tube horn, double cone horn, double paradox horn, and exponential horn, were analyzed through [...] Read more.
In this paper, small-sized acoustic horns, the sensitivity enhancement package for the MEMS-based thermal acoustic particle velocity sensor, have been designed and optimized. Four kinds of acoustic horns, including tube horn, double cone horn, double paradox horn, and exponential horn, were analyzed through numerical calculation. Considering both the amplification factor and effective length of amplification zone, a small-sized double cone horn with middle tube is designed and further optimized. A three-wire thermal acoustic particle velocity sensor was fabricated and packaged in the 3D printed double cone tube (DCT) horn. Experiment results show that an amplification factor of 6.63 at 600 Hz and 6.93 at 1 kHz was achieved. A good 8-shape directivity pattern was also obtained for the optimized DCT horn with the lateral inhibition ratio of 50.3 dB. No additional noise was introduced, demonstrating the DCT horn’s potential in improving the sensitivity of acoustic particle velocity sensors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MEMS and Ultra-Sensitive Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 854 KiB  
Article
sUAS-Based Remote Sensing of River Discharge Using Thermal Particle Image Velocimetry and Bathymetric Lidar
by Paul J. Kinzel and Carl J. Legleiter
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(19), 2317; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11192317 - 5 Oct 2019
Cited by 49 | Viewed by 7897
Abstract
This paper describes a non-contact methodology for computing river discharge based on data collected from small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS). The approach is complete in that both surface velocity and channel geometry are measured directly under field conditions. The technique does not require [...] Read more.
This paper describes a non-contact methodology for computing river discharge based on data collected from small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS). The approach is complete in that both surface velocity and channel geometry are measured directly under field conditions. The technique does not require introducing artificial tracer particles for computing surface velocity, nor does it rely upon the presence of naturally occurring floating material. Moreover, no prior knowledge of river bathymetry is necessary. Due to the weight of the sensors and limited payload capacities of the commercially available sUAS used in the study, two sUAS were required. The first sUAS included mid-wave thermal infrared and visible cameras. For the field evaluation described herein, a thermal image time series was acquired and a particle image velocimetry (PIV) algorithm used to track the motion of structures expressed at the water surface as small differences in temperature. The ability to detect these thermal features was significant because the water surface lacked floating material (e.g., foam, debris) that could have been detected with a visible camera and used to perform conventional Large-Scale Particle Image Velocimetry (LSPIV). The second sUAS was devoted to measuring bathymetry with a novel scanning polarizing lidar. We collected field measurements along two channel transects to assess the accuracy of the remotely sensed velocities, depths, and discharges. Thermal PIV provided velocities that agreed closely ( R 2 = 0.82 and 0.64) with in situ velocity measurements from an acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP). Depths inferred from the lidar closely matched those surveyed by wading in the shallower of the two cross sections ( R 2 = 0.95), but the agreement was not as strong for the transect with greater depths ( R 2 = 0.61). Incremental discharges computed with the remotely sensed velocities and depths were greater than corresponding ADCP measurements by 22% at the first cross section and <1% at the second. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop