Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (48)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = symptom palliation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 914 KiB  
Review
Advances in Surgical Management of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
by Sang-Ho Jeong, Miyeong Park, Kyung Won Seo and Jae-Seok Min
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2567; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152567 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 27
Abstract
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) is a serious complication arising from advanced gastric or pancreatic head cancer, significantly impairing patients’ quality of life by disrupting oral intake and inducing severe gastrointestinal symptoms. With benign causes such as peptic ulcer disease on the decline, [...] Read more.
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) is a serious complication arising from advanced gastric or pancreatic head cancer, significantly impairing patients’ quality of life by disrupting oral intake and inducing severe gastrointestinal symptoms. With benign causes such as peptic ulcer disease on the decline, malignancies now account for 50–80% of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) cases globally. This review outlines the pathophysiology, evolving epidemiology, and treatment modalities for MGOO. Therapeutic approaches include conservative management, endoscopic stenting, surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ), stomach partitioning gastrojejunostomy (SPGJ), and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE). While endoscopic stenting offers rapid symptom relief with minimal invasiveness, it has higher rates of re-obstruction. Surgical options like GJ and SPGJ provide more durable palliation, especially for patients with longer expected survival. SPGJ, a modified surgical technique, demonstrates reduced incidence of delayed gastric emptying and may improve postoperative oral intake and survival compared to conventional GJ. EUS-GE represents a promising, minimally invasive alternative that combines surgical durability with endoscopic efficiency, although long-term data remain limited. Treatment selection should consider patient performance status, tumor characteristics, prognosis, and institutional resources. This comprehensive review underscores the need for individualized, multidisciplinary decision-making to optimize symptom relief, nutritional status, and overall outcomes in patients with MGOO. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

62 pages, 4641 KiB  
Review
Pharmacist-Driven Chondroprotection in Osteoarthritis: A Multifaceted Approach Using Patient Education, Information Visualization, and Lifestyle Integration
by Eloy del Río
Pharmacy 2025, 13(4), 106; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13040106 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 151
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) remains a major contributor to pain and disability; however, the current management is largely reactive, focusing on symptoms rather than preventing irreversible cartilage loss. This review first examines the mechanistic foundations for pharmacological chondroprotection—illustrating how conventional agents, such as glucosamine sulfate [...] Read more.
Osteoarthritis (OA) remains a major contributor to pain and disability; however, the current management is largely reactive, focusing on symptoms rather than preventing irreversible cartilage loss. This review first examines the mechanistic foundations for pharmacological chondroprotection—illustrating how conventional agents, such as glucosamine sulfate and chondroitin sulfate, can potentially restore extracellular matrix (ECM) components, may attenuate catabolic enzyme activity, and might enhance joint lubrication—and explores the delivery challenges posed by avascular cartilage and synovial diffusion barriers. Subsequently, a practical “What–How–When” framework is introduced to guide community pharmacists in risk screening, DMOAD selection, chronotherapeutic dosing, safety monitoring, and lifestyle integration, as exemplified by the CHONDROMOVING infographic brochure designed for diverse health literacy levels. Building on these strategies, the P4–4P Chondroprotection Framework is proposed, integrating predictive risk profiling (physicians), preventive pharmacokinetic and chronotherapy optimization (pharmacists), personalized biomechanical interventions (physiotherapists), and participatory self-management (patients) into a unified, feedback-driven OA care model. To translate this framework into routine practice, I recommend the development of DMOAD-specific clinical guidelines, incorporation of chondroprotective chronotherapy and interprofessional collaboration into health-professional curricula, and establishment of multidisciplinary OA management pathways—supported by appropriate reimbursement structures, to support preventive, team-based management, and prioritization of large-scale randomized trials and real-world evidence studies to validate the long-term structural, functional, and quality of life benefits of synchronized DMOAD and exercise-timed interventions. This comprehensive, precision-driven paradigm aims to shift OA care from reactive palliation to true disease modification, preserving cartilage integrity and improving the quality of life for millions worldwide. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 629 KiB  
Article
Palliative Luminal Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Using Endoscopic Calcium-Electroporation: First Case Series from United Kingdom
by Ademola Adeyeye, Olaolu Olabintan, Homira Ayubi, Hao Gao, Aman Saini, Andrew Emmanuel, Bu’Hussain Hayee and Amyn Haji
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4138; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124138 - 11 Jun 2025
Viewed by 809
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy, the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and the third most prevalent tumor. Around 20% of cases are metastatic or inoperable at diagnosis, often requiring palliative treatment, which may not be feasible [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy, the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and the third most prevalent tumor. Around 20% of cases are metastatic or inoperable at diagnosis, often requiring palliative treatment, which may not be feasible in frail patients. Calcium-electroporation, a less invasive alternative, induces cell death via apoptosis, necrosis, and pyroptosis. This study is the first in the United Kingdom to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic calcium-electroporation in palliating distal CRC. Methods: Frail patients with inoperable left-sided CRC were included. The diagnosis and staging followed standard guidelines, while frailty was assessed using the performance status (PFS), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Calcium electroporation was performed via a flexible endoscopy usually under sedation, with symptom relief, quality of life (QoL), survival, and adverse events (AE) monitored. Results: Sixteen patients (median age 84.5) underwent 36 treatments with electroporation over 28 months (November 2022 to March 2025). The incidence of common symptoms was rectal bleeding (75%), constipation (25%), and pain (75%). Nine patients had metastases and three had failed conventional treatments. Symptomatic relief and an improved QoL occurred in 86.7%, with transfusion/iron infusion needs reduced by 91.7%. The median cancer-specific survival was 10 months, with a 94% survival rate. No device-related AE was recorded. One patient died after 11 months due to disease progression while two patients passed away from other medical conditions. Conclusions: Endoscopic calcium electroporation is a safe, palliative option effective for tumor reduction and symptomatic relief in frail CRC patients unfit for conventional therapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Gastrointestinal Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 464 KiB  
Article
Clinical Characteristics and Management of Patients Admitted to the Supportive Care Clinic and Predisposing Factors of Unplanned Hospital Readmission: Single-Center Experience
by Onur Baş, Mert Tokatlı, Naciye Güdük, Dilara Erdoğan, Nur Evşan Boyraz, Çağla Çengelci, Deniz Can Guven, Ömer Dizdar, Fatma Alev Türker and Sercan Aksoy
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(8), 2679; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082679 - 14 Apr 2025
Viewed by 563
Abstract
Background: It is well known that supportive care clinics are vital in medical oncology practice. This study aims to present a portrait of the supportive care clinic of a tertiary cancer center in a low-middle-income country. Methods: This study included patients admitted to [...] Read more.
Background: It is well known that supportive care clinics are vital in medical oncology practice. This study aims to present a portrait of the supportive care clinic of a tertiary cancer center in a low-middle-income country. Methods: This study included patients admitted to our supportive care clinic between January 2019 and December 2023. This study included patients who attended the supportive care clinic. For patients who were readmitted more than once throughout the study period, only the first readmission was included in the analysis. The primary outcome of this study was a better understanding of the risk factors associated with hospital readmissions in cancer patients, which could lead to improved patient outcomes. In addition, the secondary objective was to identify the characteristics of patients and clinical decisions regarding follow-ups as inpatients or outpatients referred to the supportive care clinic. Results: This study included 477 patients; 300 (62.9%) were directed to oncology inpatient care, while 177 (37.1%) were treated as outpatients. The most common diagnoses were lung cancer (20.5%), colorectal cancer (13.6%), and breast cancer (8.4%). Most patients (71.5%) were evaluated for symptom palliation. In multivariate analysis, metastatic disease (OR: 2.52 95% CI 1.48–4.29 p = 0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (OR: 1.58 95% CI 1.04–2.42 p = 0.034), and a decrease in albumin levels (OR: 0.42 95% CI 0.29–0.61 < 0.001) were significantly related to hospitalization. In univariate analyses, albumin level (p < 0.001), disease stage (p = 0.007), and ECOG performance status (p = 0.025) were statistically associated with unplanned hospital readmission. Among these factors, a decrease in albumin levels was significantly associated with the outcome, with an odds ratio of 0.54 (95% CI 0.39–0.75, p < 0.001), indicating a protective effect of higher albumin levels. In univariate analyses, sex (p = 0.016), cancer treatment type (p = 0.010), albumin level (p < 0.001), disease stage (p < 0.001), unplanned hospital readmission (p < 0.001), ECOG performance status (p < 0.001), and hemoglobin (p = 0.008) were statistically related to overall survival. Among these factors, sex (HR: 1.28 95% CI 1.03–1.59 p = 0.025), a decrease in albumin levels (HR: 0.67 95% CI 0.56–0.82 p < 0.001), disease stage (HR: 1.52 95% CI 1.11–2.09 p = 0.008), unplanned hospital readmission (HR: 1.30 95% CI 1.03–1.63 p = 0.027), and ECOG performance status (HR: 3.45 95% CI 2.68–4.45 p < 0.001) remained significant in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: This study shows that supportive care clinics are a key element of patient care. Early evaluation of patients in supportive care clinics may aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients who may require closer follow-up or inpatient care. Several factors were identified as predisposing to hospitalization, unplanned hospital readmission, and overall survival. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the risk factors associated with hospitalization, readmission, and overall survival. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 714 KiB  
Systematic Review
A Systematic Review of Indications and Clinical Outcomes of Electrochemotherapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
by Gianluca Rompianesi, Giuseppe Loiaco, Luigi Rescigno, Gianluca Benassai, Mariano Cesare Giglio, Silvia Campanile, Marcello Caggiano, Roberto Montalti and Roberto Ivan Troisi
Cancers 2025, 17(3), 408; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17030408 - 26 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1332
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most difficult cancers to treat, with a dismal 5-year survival rate of only 8–10%. This challenging prognosis highlights the urgent need for innovative therapeutic approaches to improve outcomes for patients with PDAC. Electrochemotherapy (ECT), [...] Read more.
Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most difficult cancers to treat, with a dismal 5-year survival rate of only 8–10%. This challenging prognosis highlights the urgent need for innovative therapeutic approaches to improve outcomes for patients with PDAC. Electrochemotherapy (ECT), which enhances intracellular chemotherapeutic uptake via electric pulses, has been explored for resectable, borderline resectable (BR), locally advanced (LA), recurrent, and metastatic PDAC, either as a complement to conventional treatments or as an alternative when these are not feasible or effective, offering possible benefits in symptomatic palliation and local tumor control. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for studies assessing the efficacy of ECT in PDAC. After searching Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science, five studies with a combined total of 43 patients in various disease stages were identified. Results: ECT showed promise in improving tumor control, alleviating cancer-related pain, and improving quality of life. One study noted a trend towards tumor size reduction of 8.3% at one-month and 16.1% at six-months follow-up (p = 0.211 and p = 0.315), although these findings were derived from studies conducted without specific comparative control groups. Severity of complication was mainly mild (Clavien–Dindo I-II), while severe complications occurred in only 2.3% of patients. Median overall survival was reported in two studies as 8 months (range 2–19) and 11.5 months (range 1–74). ECT showed efficacy for symptom management, with 60% of patients reporting reduced pain/discomfort and 40% showing enhanced quality of life in one study, while another reported pain scores as decreasing from 6 to 3 at one month and to 2 at six months. Conclusions: ECT appears to be a new promising and safe adjunct treatment modality in PDAC management across different disease stages, with potential benefits in tumor control, cancer-related pain reduction, and quality of life. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and identify patients who could benefit most. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 977 KiB  
Review
Advances in Therapy for Urothelial and Non-Urothelial Subtype Histologies of Advanced Bladder Cancer: From Etiology to Current Development
by Whi-An Kwon, Ho Kyung Seo, Geehyun Song, Min-Kyung Lee and Weon Seo Park
Biomedicines 2025, 13(1), 86; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13010086 - 1 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2239
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common histological subtype of bladder tumors; however, bladder cancer represents a heterogeneous group of diseases with at least 40 distinct histological subtypes. Among these, the 2022 World Health Organization classification of urinary tract tumors identifies a range [...] Read more.
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common histological subtype of bladder tumors; however, bladder cancer represents a heterogeneous group of diseases with at least 40 distinct histological subtypes. Among these, the 2022 World Health Organization classification of urinary tract tumors identifies a range of less common subtypes of invasive UC, formerly known as variants, which are considered high-grade tumors, including squamous cell, small-cell, sarcomatoid urothelial, micropapillary, plasmacytoid, and urachal carcinomas, and adenocarcinoma. Their accurate histological diagnosis is critical for risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making, as most subtype histologies are associated with poorer outcomes than conventional UC. Despite the importance of a precise diagnosis, high-quality evidence on optimal treatments for subtype histologies remains limited owing to their rarity. In particular, neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy have not been well characterized, and prospective data are scarce. For advanced-stage diseases, clinical trial participation is strongly recommended to address the lack of robust evidence. Advances in molecular pathology and the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapies have reshaped our understanding and classification of bladder cancer subtypes, spurring efforts to identify predictive biomarkers to guide personalized treatment strategies. Nevertheless, the management of rare bladder cancer subgroups remains challenging because they are frequently excluded from clinical trials. For localized disease, curative options such as surgical resection or radiotherapy are available; however, treatment options become more limited in recurrence or metastasis, where systemic therapy is primarily used to control disease progression and palliate symptoms. Herein, we present recent advances in the management of urothelial and non-urothelial bladder cancer subtypes and also explore the current evidence guiding their treatment and emphasize the challenges and perspectives of future therapeutic strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Biology and Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 583 KiB  
Review
Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Obstructing Colon Cancer and Extracolonic Cancer: A Review of Latest Evidence
by Pedro Marílio Cardoso and Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto
Cancers 2025, 17(1), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17010087 - 30 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1945
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality, with many patients presenting with malignant colorectal obstruction (MCO). Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) have emerged as a minimally invasive key intervention, both as a bridge to surgery (BTS) in curative setting sand for [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality, with many patients presenting with malignant colorectal obstruction (MCO). Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) have emerged as a minimally invasive key intervention, both as a bridge to surgery (BTS) in curative setting sand for palliation in advanced disease. This review aims to provide an evidence-based analysis of SEMS indications, contraindications, and efficacy across curative and palliative contexts, with focus on long-term outcomes. Based on data from recent trials and guidelines, we examine SEMS placement outcomes, focusing on specific scenarios, including BTS for left-sided MCO, chemotherapy (with angiogenic agents) safety during stent therapy, the optimal timing between SEMS placement and surgery, and oncological outcomes. We also discuss the use of SEMSs in challenging contexts such as proximal colon obstruction and extracolonic obstruction, and the relevant technical considerations. Findings indicate that using a SEMS in the BTS setting reduces emergency surgery needs, minimizes complications, and decreases stoma formation. Long-term oncologic outcomes, particularly recurrence, are still debated, but recent evidence shows that SEMS placement is safe, without worsening long term outcomes. Palliative SEMS placement shows high efficacy in symptom relief with manageable adverse events. Success depends on patient selection and technical expertise, with multidisciplinary approaches essential for optimal outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endoscopic Advances in Gastrointestinal Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 994 KiB  
Article
Palliation of Gastric Outlet Obstruction in Case of Biliary Obstruction—A Retrospective, Multicenter Study: The B-GOOD Study
by Alessandro Fugazza, Marta Andreozzi, Cecilia Binda, Andrea Lisotti, Ilaria Tarantino, Juan J. Vila, Carlos Robles Medranda, Arnaldo Amato, Alberto Larghi, Enrique Perez Cuadrado Robles, Giovanni Aragona, Francesco Di Matteo, Roberta Badas, Cesare Hassan, Carmelo Barbera, Benedetto Mangiavillano, Stefano Crinò, Matteo Colombo, Carlo Fabbri, Pietro Fusaroli, Antonio Facciorusso, Andrea Anderloni, Marco Spadaccini and Alessandro Repiciadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2024, 16(19), 3375; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16193375 - 2 Oct 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1184
Abstract
Background: EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel and effective procedure for the management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) with more durable results when compared to enteral stenting (ES). However, data comparing EUS-GE to ES in patients already treated with EUS-guided choledocoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) [...] Read more.
Background: EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel and effective procedure for the management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) with more durable results when compared to enteral stenting (ES). However, data comparing EUS-GE to ES in patients already treated with EUS-guided choledocoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) for distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO) are lacking. We aimed to compare outcomes of EUS-GE and ES for the palliation of GOO in this specific population of patients. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with DMBO treated by EUS-CDS and subsequent GOO treated by EUS-GE or ES from 2016 to 2021 was conducted. Primary outcomes were overall AEs rate and dysfunction of the EUS-CDS after GOO treatment. Secondary outcomes included clinical success, technical success, procedure duration, length of hospital stay and relapse of GOO symptoms. Results: A total of 77 consecutive patients were included in the study: 25 patients underwent EUS-GE and 52 underwent ES. AEs rate and patency outcomes of the EUS-CDS after GOO treatment were comparable between the two groups (12.5% vs. 17.3%; p = 0.74). No recurrence of GOO symptoms was registered in the EUS-GE group while 11.5% of ES patients had symptoms recurrence, even if not statistically significant (p = 0.16), after a mean follow-up period of 63.5 days. Conclusion: EUS-GE and ES are both effective and safe for the palliation of GOO in patients already treated by EUS-CDS for DMBO with no difference in the biliary stent dysfunction rate and overall AEs. EUS-GE is associated with less recurrence of GOO symptoms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Methods and Technologies Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 282 KiB  
Review
Palliative Thoracic Radiotherapy in the Era of Modern Cancer Care for NSCLC
by Lucyna Kępka
Cancers 2024, 16(17), 3018; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16173018 - 29 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1526
Abstract
Palliative thoracic radiotherapy provides rapid and effective symptom relief in approximately two-thirds of NSCLC patients treated. In patients with poor performance status, the degree of palliation appears unrelated to the radiation dose or fractionation schedule. Conversely, in patients with good performance status, higher [...] Read more.
Palliative thoracic radiotherapy provides rapid and effective symptom relief in approximately two-thirds of NSCLC patients treated. In patients with poor performance status, the degree of palliation appears unrelated to the radiation dose or fractionation schedule. Conversely, in patients with good performance status, higher radiation doses administered over longer periods have shown modest survival benefits. These findings stem from studies conducted before the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in clinical practice. Currently, there are no large prospective studies specifically dedicated to palliative radiotherapy conducted in this new treatment era. Modern radiotherapy technologies are now widely available and are increasingly used for palliative purposes in selected patients, reflecting the expanded array of therapeutic options for disseminated NSCLC and improved prognosis. Some traditional tenets of palliative thoracic radiotherapy, such as the improvement of overall survival with a protracted radiation schedule and the use of simple, cost-effective radiation techniques for palliative purposes, may no longer hold true for patients receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. The application of IMRT or SBRT in the context of palliative radiotherapy for NSCLC is not yet sufficiently explored, and this is addressed in this review. Moreover, new risks associated with combining palliative radiotherapy with these systemic treatments are being explored and are discussed within the context of palliative care. The optimal timing, doses, fractionation schedules, and treatment volumes for radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy or targeted therapy are currently subjects of investigation. In emergencies, radiotherapy should be used as a life-saving measure without delay. However, for other indications of palliative thoracic radiotherapy, decisions regarding doses, timing relative to systemic treatments, and treatment volumes should be made in a multidisciplinary context, considering the patient’s prognosis, anticipated outcomes, and access to potentially effective treatments. We still lack robust data from prospective studies on this matter. This review examines and discusses available evidence on the use of palliative thoracic radiotherapy within the framework of modern treatment strategies for NSCLC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Review for Cancer Therapy)
9 pages, 9713 KiB  
Case Report
Giant Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma—A Renal Hazard
by Raymond A. Dieter, George B. Kuzycz and Blake J. Carlino
Uro 2024, 4(3), 115-123; https://doi.org/10.3390/uro4030009 - 1 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1532
Abstract
Retroperitoneal tumors are uncommon and may reach a large size prior to causing symptoms or being noticed by the patient or physician. A middle-aged female consulted us for care during her “terminal” illness. She had already undergone four previous retroperitoneal resection surgical procedures. [...] Read more.
Retroperitoneal tumors are uncommon and may reach a large size prior to causing symptoms or being noticed by the patient or physician. A middle-aged female consulted us for care during her “terminal” illness. She had already undergone four previous retroperitoneal resection surgical procedures. She presented with a large recurrent protruding mass from the right side of the abdomen and related a history of a previous cholecystectomy, right nephrectomy, right colectomy, and repeated resection of a recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma. She thus came to us for consultation and terminal care in order to be away from her friends during treatment for this terminal condition. After our consultation, she elected to have repeated surgical excisions of the tumor. The surgical excisions yielded a giant recurrent tumor mass, which overflowed and covered all margins of the 21-inch-wide surgical scrub basin. Over the next eleven years, she had multiple surgical resection procedures involving both the right and left retroperitoneum (a splenectomy, a left colectomy, and a colostomy). Recovery from each of these resection procedures (the final combined resection weight was 120 pounds) was without complications. However, the tumor finally encased the pancreas and the left kidney. If the tumor encasement were to be palliated and resected, she would require hemodialysis. At this time, the patient elected to have no further resection surgeries, no dialysis, nor any palliative chemoradiation treatment. Over a period of sixteen years from her first resection and twelve years from our first resection, the patient had continued to work at her medical administrative and leadership position and led a functional life after our consultation, except for her surgical period. The patient was not cured but benefited from repeated palliative surgeries, prolonging her life and improving her job performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lower Urinary Tract Research: Rationale, Feasibility, and Design)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 254 KiB  
Review
Gastro-Intestinal Symptoms in Palliative Care Patients
by Golda Elisa Tradounsky
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(4), 2341-2352; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31040174 - 21 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3527
Abstract
This review of the palliation of various gastro-intestinal (GI) symptoms encountered in cancer patients is by no means exhaustive. Frequent symptoms such as constipation, nausea and vomiting, bowel obstructions, ascites and bleeds will be discussed, focusing on their assessment and most importantly, how [...] Read more.
This review of the palliation of various gastro-intestinal (GI) symptoms encountered in cancer patients is by no means exhaustive. Frequent symptoms such as constipation, nausea and vomiting, bowel obstructions, ascites and bleeds will be discussed, focusing on their assessment and most importantly, how to control the associated symptoms. All of these symptoms and GI complications can significantly impact patients’ quality of life (QOL) and should be treated as quickly and aggressively as possible. Full article
13 pages, 2062 KiB  
Review
Management of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Comprehensive Review on the Old, the Classic and the Innovative Approaches
by Alessandro Fugazza, Marta Andreozzi, Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei, Agustin Insausti, Marco Spadaccini, Matteo Colombo, Silvia Carrara, Maria Terrin, Alessandro De Marco, Gianluca Franchellucci, Kareem Khalaf, Pardis Ketabi Moghadam, Chiara Ferrari, Andrea Anderloni, Giovanni Capretti, Gennaro Nappo, Alessandro Zerbi and Alessandro Repici
Medicina 2024, 60(4), 638; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60040638 - 16 Apr 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3900
Abstract
Gastrojejunostomy is the principal method of palliation for unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstructions (GOO). Gastrojejunostomy was traditionally performed as a surgical procedure with an open approach butrecently, notable progress in the development of minimally invasive procedures such as laparoscopic gastrojejunostomies have emerged. Additionally, [...] Read more.
Gastrojejunostomy is the principal method of palliation for unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstructions (GOO). Gastrojejunostomy was traditionally performed as a surgical procedure with an open approach butrecently, notable progress in the development of minimally invasive procedures such as laparoscopic gastrojejunostomies have emerged. Additionally, advancements in endoscopic techniques, including endoscopic stenting (ES) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE), are becoming more prominent. ES involves the placement of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) to restore luminal patency. ES is commonly the first choice for patients deemed unfit for surgery or at high surgical risk. However, although ES leads to rapid improvement of symptoms, it carries limitations like higher stent dysfunction rates and the need for frequent re-interventions. Recently, EUS-GE has emerged as a potential alternative, combining the minimally invasive nature of the endoscopic approach with the long-lasting effects of a gastrojejunostomy. Having reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of these different techniques, this article aims to provide a comprehensive review regarding the management of unresectable malignant GOO. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Advances in Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 463 KiB  
Systematic Review
Optimizing Palliative Pelvic Radiotherapy in Gynecological Cancers: A Systematic Review and Analysis
by Beatrice Anghel, Mihai-Teodor Georgescu, Crenguta Sorina Serboiu, Andreea Nicoleta Marinescu, Cătălin Aliuș, Dragoș-Eugen Georgescu, Bogdan Mocanu, Sabina Sucuri and Anca Daniela Stanescu
Diagnostics 2024, 14(5), 547; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14050547 - 5 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2854
Abstract
Background: Palliative radiotherapy plays a crucial role in managing symptomatic gynecological cancers (GCs). This article aims to systematically review literature studies on palliative pelvic radiotherapy in cervical, endometrial, ovarian, vaginal, and vulvar cancers. The primary focus is centered around evaluating symptom relief, quality [...] Read more.
Background: Palliative radiotherapy plays a crucial role in managing symptomatic gynecological cancers (GCs). This article aims to systematically review literature studies on palliative pelvic radiotherapy in cervical, endometrial, ovarian, vaginal, and vulvar cancers. The primary focus is centered around evaluating symptom relief, quality of life (QOL), and toxicity in order to ascertain optimal radiotherapy regimens. Methodology: For this thorough review, we mainly relied on Medline to gather papers published until November 2023. Selected studies specifically detailed symptomatology and QOL responses in palliative pelvic radiotherapy used for GCs. Results: Thirty-one studies, mostly retrospective studies and those lacking standardized outcome measures, showed varied responses. Encouraging outcomes were noted in managing hemorrhage (55%) and pain control (70%). However, comprehensively assessing overall symptom response rates and toxicity remained challenging. Investigations into 10 Gy fractionation revealed benefits in addressing tumor-related bleeding and pain in female genital tract cancers. Conclusions: Palliative pelvic radiotherapy effectively manages symptomatic GCs. Nonetheless, unresolved dosing and fractionation considerations warrant further investigation. Embracing modern therapies alongside radiotherapy offers improved symptom control, emphasizing the importance of selecting suitable patients for successful GC palliation interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Radiotherapy in Oncology: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2057 KiB  
Article
Immunotherapy-Related Oral Adverse Effects: Immediate Sequelae, Chronicity and Secondary Cancer
by Sharon Elad, Noam Yarom and Yehuda Zadik
Cancers 2023, 15(19), 4781; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15194781 - 28 Sep 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3799
Abstract
(1) Background: Immunotherapy-related adverse effects (irAEs) have been reported to manifest in oral tissues, mainly as lichenoid and non-lichenoid lesions and salivary gland dysfunction; however, the characterization of oral irAEs and their clinical impact is limited. (2) Methods: This is a retrospective clinical [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Immunotherapy-related adverse effects (irAEs) have been reported to manifest in oral tissues, mainly as lichenoid and non-lichenoid lesions and salivary gland dysfunction; however, the characterization of oral irAEs and their clinical impact is limited. (2) Methods: This is a retrospective clinical chart review of 14 patients with oral irAEs, describing the impact of the oral irAEs in terms of the immediate effect, treatment, chronicity of the irAEs and the development of oral cancer. (3) Results: Common symptoms were pain and dry mouth, causing no-to-severe pain and/or dry mouth sensation. The immediate sequala ranged from sensitivity to certain foods up to elimination of oral intake. Treatment included conventional palliation techniques with or without systemic steroids. Discontinuation of the immunotherapy agents was required in 6 patients. Innovative treatment modalities included photobiomodulation for oral mucosal pain relief, and salivary gland intraductal irrigations for relief of salivary gland hypofunction. Late sequala included the development of proliferative leukoplakia and oral cancer. (4) Conclusions: Patients treated with immunotherapy may develop debilitating oral irAEs. They should be followed for oral involvement so treatment may be initiated when the symptoms are mild to avoid discontinuation of the immunotherapy. Patients that develop oral lichenoid lesions should receive long-term follow-up, as they may have higher risk for oral cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Supportive Care for Patients with Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 767 KiB  
Systematic Review
Effect of Conservative Rehabilitation Interventions on Health-Related Quality of Life in Women with Upper Limb Lymphedema Secondary to Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
by María Nieves Muñoz-Alcaraz, Antonio José Jiménez-Vílchez, Luis Ángel Pérula-de Torres, Jesús Serrano-Merino, Álvaro García-Bustillo, Rocío Pardo-Hernández, Jerónimo Javier González-Bernal and Josefa González-Santos
Healthcare 2023, 11(18), 2568; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182568 - 17 Sep 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3205
Abstract
Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) of the upper limb is a very common condition in women undergoing breast cancer treatment; it can cause considerable alterations in the daily life of patients and a decrease in their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Currently, there are [...] Read more.
Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) of the upper limb is a very common condition in women undergoing breast cancer treatment; it can cause considerable alterations in the daily life of patients and a decrease in their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Currently, there are many conservative therapies that try to palliate the symptoms, but the results are still controversial and there are still no globally accepted treatments. The purpose of this article is to determine the effect, according to the current available evidence, on HRQoL of different conservative interventions in the rehabilitation of BCRL in the upper limb in women. Eighteen articles that compared the effects of standard treatments, such as manual lymphatic drainage-based decongestive therapy or compression measures, and other newer treatments, including new technologies and other types of treatment programs, were reviewed. According to the results of this review, the most recommended modality for the improvement of HRQoL would be a complex decongestive technique without manual lymphatic drainage. Although there are clinical trials that have demonstrated the effectiveness of various treatments, the results of the positive effects on HRQoL remain highly controversial. There is a need to continue to develop studies to help guide therapeutic decisions that can promote HRQoL in women affected by upper limb BCRL. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop