Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = superomedial angle

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 7303 KB  
Article
MRI-Derived Scapular Superomedial Angle and Acromial Morphology: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Reliability and Morphometric Association Study
by Sami Kandefer, Volkan Gür, Mehmet Burak Gökgöz, Muhammet Ali Can, Metin Taş, Kemal Buğra Memiş, Mecit Kantarcı, Nizamettin Koçkara and Furkan Yapıcı
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(17), 6612; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15176612 - 27 Aug 2026
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived scapular superomedial angle (SMA) may serve as a continuous descriptor of scapular geometry. We evaluated whether SMA is associated with acromial morphology, examined SMA and subacromial space (SAS) across acromial categories, and quantified measurement reliability. Methods: In [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived scapular superomedial angle (SMA) may serve as a continuous descriptor of scapular geometry. We evaluated whether SMA is associated with acromial morphology, examined SMA and subacromial space (SAS) across acromial categories, and quantified measurement reliability. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, 306 shoulders from 279 patients (27 bilateral) were analyzed after screening 353 examinations. SMA and SAS were measured independently by two orthopedic observers, and acromial morphology was classified independently by two radiologists, all in blinded sessions. Reliability, group comparisons, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, and patient-level clustered generalized estimating equations were performed. Results: Interobserver reliability was excellent for SMA (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.960) and SAS (ICC, 0.926), and intraobserver reliability was excellent for SMA and good for SAS (ICC, 0.944 and 0.848); acromial classification agreement was almost perfect (linear-weighted kappa, 0.980). SMA increased stepwise across Type I to III acromia (128.7°, 133.9°, 137.2°; p < 0.001), whereas SAS decreased (7.5, 6.8, 6.3 mm; p < 0.001). Each 1° SMA increase was independently associated with Type III morphology (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; p < 0.001). SMA was not independently associated with rotator-cuff severity (p = 0.842). Because adjacent Type II–III differences approached the minimum detectable change, individual-level discrimination was limited. Conclusions: MRI-derived SMA is a reproducible descriptor associated with acromial morphology at the group level, but adjacent-category differences approached measurement error. SMA should not substitute for direct acromial classification, and external validation is required before clinical thresholds are considered. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 530 KB  
Article
Scapular Asymmetries and Dyskinesis in Young Elite Swimmers: Evaluating Static vs. Functional Shoulder Alterations
by Jacopo Preziosi Standoli and Tiziano Preziosi Standoli
Osteology 2025, 5(3), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology5030022 - 3 Jul 2025
Viewed by 3732
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Overhead athletes, including swimmers, are prone to shoulder adaptations and pathologies, such as scapular dyskinesis (SD) and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD). While SD has been extensively studied in various overhead sports, its prevalence and clinical implications in swimmers remain unclear. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Overhead athletes, including swimmers, are prone to shoulder adaptations and pathologies, such as scapular dyskinesis (SD) and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD). While SD has been extensively studied in various overhead sports, its prevalence and clinical implications in swimmers remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate static scapular asymmetries (SAs), defined as differences in the observed position of the scapulae at rest or in a fixed position, in young elite swimmers and compare these findings with functional scapular dyskinesis (SD) tests, which assess alterations in scapular motion patterns during arm movement. It also assesses potential relationships between SA and SD. Methods: A cohort of 661 young elite swimmers (344 males, 317 females) was assessed during the National Young Swimming Championships. Scapular asymmetries were measured in two positions: at rest and at 90° abduction with internal rotation. The measurements included the following: (1) dHeight: Difference in superomedial scapular angle height from the C7 spinal process; (2) dDistance: Difference in the distance of the superomedial scapular angle from the body midline; (3) dAngle: Angular deviation of the medial scapular border from the plumb line, assessed using a goniometer. The presence of scapular dyskinesis (SD) was determined using a functional test, and SA findings were compared with SD results. Statistical analyses included ANOVA and chi-square tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Scapular asymmetries were observed in 3.63% to 15.43% of swimmers, with no significant associations with age, gender, BMI, training years, or swimming characteristics (p > 0.05). A significant difference was observed between dominant limb and scapular height in abduction (p < 0.05). In position 1 (resting position), SA was significantly more prevalent in swimmers without SD (p < 0.001 for dHeight, p = 0.016 for dDistance). In position 2 (abduction), SA was significantly associated with SD-negative subjects in dAngle (p = 0.014) and dDistance (p = 0.02), while dHeight was not significant (p > 0.05). These findings suggest that static scapular asymmetries do not necessarily correlate with dynamic scapular dysfunction (SD), and, indeed, a negative correlation was observed where SA was significantly more prevalent in swimmers without SD in several measures (position 1, p < 0.001 for dHeight and p = 0.016 for dDistance; position 2, p = 0.014 for dAngle and p = 0.02 for dDistance). Conclusions: Young elite swimmers exhibit a relatively symmetrical scapular positioning, with scapular asymmetries potentially representing normal adaptations rather than pathological findings. The lack of positive correlation between SA and SD, and the higher prevalence of SA in SD-negative subjects, suggests the need for caution when interpreting static scapular assessments in swimmers as SA may reflect sport-specific adaptations rather than pathology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Sports Medicine Based on Orthopedics and Osteology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3305 KB  
Case Report
Superomedial Scapula Angle Osteochondroma with Winging in a Young Female Patient—Case Report and Literature Review
by Cosmin Faur, Ahmed Abu-Awwad, Jenel-Marian Patrascu, Simona-Alina Abu-Awwad and Cristina Tudoran
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(15), 5106; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155106 - 3 Aug 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3148
Abstract
(1) Background: Osteochondromas are the most common benign bone tumors, primarily found in long bones, while scapular osteochondromas are rare and account for less than 1% of all osteochondromas. (2) Methods: We present a case of a young female patient with a unique [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Osteochondromas are the most common benign bone tumors, primarily found in long bones, while scapular osteochondromas are rare and account for less than 1% of all osteochondromas. (2) Methods: We present a case of a young female patient with a unique presentation of scapular osteochondroma. The patient exhibited superomedial scapula angle osteochondroma with winging, a rare manifestation of scapular osteochondroma. The patient had a slow-growing mass on the left scapula for several years. Physical examination revealed a visible deformity with significant winging of the scapula. Imaging studies demonstrated a large osteochondroma arising from the superomedial angle of the left scapula, with a bony stalk. (3) Results: Surgical excision was performed, and histopathological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of osteochondroma. Following the surgery, the patient experienced a significant improvement in scapular winging. A comprehensive literature review revealed only a limited number of reported cases of scapular osteochondroma with winging, underscoring the significance of this case report as a valuable addition to the existing literature. The diagnosis of scapular osteochondroma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with a scapular mass, particularly when associated with winging. Surgical excision is the recommended treatment, and complete excision is crucial to prevent recurrence. (4) Conclusions: This case report highlights a rare presentation of scapular osteochondroma with winging and emphasizes the importance of considering this diagnosis in patients with scapular masses accompanied by winging. The successful surgical intervention in our case resulted in significant improvement. Clinicians should be aware of this entity and consider prompt surgical intervention for complete excision, ensuring optimal patient outcomes and preventing recurrence. Further research and additional case reports are necessary to enhance our understanding of scapular osteochondroma and its varied clinical presentations. Furthermore, comprehensive studies involving larger patient cohorts are necessary to explore the full spectrum of clinical presentations of scapular osteochondromas. By documenting and analyzing a wider range of cases, including variations in tumor location, size, and associated symptoms, researchers can identify patterns and establish more accurate diagnostic criteria. This will facilitate early detection and appropriate management of scapular osteochondromas, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine Research: In Health and Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop