Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = spiral screw pile

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 8785 KB  
Article
A Comparative Study on the End-Bearing Capacity of Toe-Wing & Spiral Screw Piles in Cohesionless Soil
by Ahmad Waheed Sahil, Taro Uchimura, Adnan Anwar Malik and Md Raihanul Kabir
Buildings 2025, 15(4), 525; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15040525 - 8 Feb 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2490
Abstract
The use of screw piles has grown rapidly, yet their varied configurations and behavior in different soils remain key research areas. This study examines the performance of Toe-wing (Tsubasa) and Spiral screw piles with similar tip areas under similar ground conditions, focusing on [...] Read more.
The use of screw piles has grown rapidly, yet their varied configurations and behavior in different soils remain key research areas. This study examines the performance of Toe-wing (Tsubasa) and Spiral screw piles with similar tip areas under similar ground conditions, focusing on how the helix position (Wp) and tip embedment depth (Ed) affect the ultimate pile capacity. In the case of a fixed helix/toe-wing position with increasing pile tip depth, Spiral screw piles exhibited higher load-carrying resistance than toe-wing piles at relative densities of 55%, 80%, and 90% fine sand. Moreover, load-carrying resistance increased as the position of the helix/toe-wing increased (Wp > 0). For a fixed pile tip depth (Ed) and varying helix/toe-wing positions, spiral screw piles showed higher resistance than toe-wing piles when Wp < 90 mm. Moreover, the resistance decreased as the helix moved away (Wp/Dh > 0), and the pile tip acted independently when Wp/Dh > 1.38. Whereas, for toe-wing piles, ultimate pile capacity increased as the toe-wing moved away from the tip up to Wp/Dh = 2.15, then decreased to reflect the independent behavior of the toe-wing and pile tip. Empirical equations are presented to convert installation effort and ultimate capacity from one type to another. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 10935 KB  
Article
Numerical Analysis of the Installation Process of Screw Piles Based on the FEM-SPH Coupling Method
by Qingxu Zhao, Yuxing Wang, Yanqin Tang, Guofeng Ren, Zhiguo Qiu, Wenhui Luo and Zilong Ye
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(17), 8508; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178508 - 25 Aug 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3366
Abstract
The installation of screw piles can cause damage to the soil, which is a dynamic and large deformation problem. In this paper, a FEM-SPH numerical model for the analysis of this large deformation problem was developed in LS-DYNA to simulate the installation process [...] Read more.
The installation of screw piles can cause damage to the soil, which is a dynamic and large deformation problem. In this paper, a FEM-SPH numerical model for the analysis of this large deformation problem was developed in LS-DYNA to simulate the installation process of screw piles. In addition, field installation tests of screw piles were carried out. By comparing the FEM-SPH simulation results with the experimental results and traditional FEM simulation results, it was found that the FEM-SPH coupling method has higher efficiency and accuracy in dealing with the large deformation problems caused by the installation of screw piles. Then, numerical simulations of screw piles with various parameters were conducted to analyze the differences in the installation process. The results show that the spiral pitch and pile diameter have a significant effect on the installation torque, soil stress and soil pressure during the installation process. During the installation process, the interaction between the screw pile and the soil is transferable. The installation of the screw pile will lead to the movement of soil particles in the radial and axial directions, resulting in heave damage to the shallow soil and cylindrical shear damage to the middle and deep soil. The influence range on the soil by the heave failure mechanism (HFM) and the cylindrical shear failure mechanism (CSFM) caused by the installation of screw piles is affected by pile parameters. The change in pile diameter will act on both HFM and CSFM, whereas the variation in spiral pitch will only have an influence on CSFM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop