Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = sensor dazzle

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 4034 KiB  
Article
Fresnel Diffraction Model for Laser Dazzling Spots of Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor Cameras
by Xinyu Wang, Zhongjie Xu, Hairong Zhong, Xiang’ai Cheng, Zhongyang Xing and Jiangbin Zhang
Sensors 2024, 24(17), 5781; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175781 - 5 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1442
Abstract
Laser dazzling on complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) image sensors is an effective method in optoelectronic countermeasures. However, previous research mainly focused on the laser dazzling under far fields, with limited studies on situations that the far-field conditions were not satisfied. In this [...] Read more.
Laser dazzling on complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) image sensors is an effective method in optoelectronic countermeasures. However, previous research mainly focused on the laser dazzling under far fields, with limited studies on situations that the far-field conditions were not satisfied. In this paper, we established a Fresnel diffraction model of laser dazzling on a CMOS by combining experiments and simulations. We calculated that the laser power density and the area of saturated pixels on the detector exhibit a linear relationship with a slope of 0.64 in a log-log plot. In the experiment, we found that the back side illumination (BSI-CMOS) matched the simulations, with an error margin of 3%, while the front side illumination (FSI-CMOS) slightly mismatched the simulations, with an error margin of 14%. We also found that the full-screen saturation threshold for the BSI-CMOS was 25% higher than the FSI-CMOS. Our work demonstrates the applicability of the Fresnel diffraction model for BSI-CMOS, which provides a valuable reference for studying laser dazzling. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 7453 KiB  
Review
Recent Advances in mmWave-Radar-Based Sensing, Its Applications, and Machine Learning Techniques: A Review
by A. Soumya, C. Krishna Mohan and Linga Reddy Cenkeramaddi
Sensors 2023, 23(21), 8901; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218901 - 1 Nov 2023
Cited by 54 | Viewed by 20017
Abstract
Human gesture detection, obstacle detection, collision avoidance, parking aids, automotive driving, medical, meteorological, industrial, agriculture, defense, space, and other relevant fields have all benefited from recent advancements in mmWave radar sensor technology. A mmWave radar has several advantages that set it apart from [...] Read more.
Human gesture detection, obstacle detection, collision avoidance, parking aids, automotive driving, medical, meteorological, industrial, agriculture, defense, space, and other relevant fields have all benefited from recent advancements in mmWave radar sensor technology. A mmWave radar has several advantages that set it apart from other types of sensors. A mmWave radar can operate in bright, dazzling, or no-light conditions. A mmWave radar has better antenna miniaturization than other traditional radars, and it has better range resolution. However, as more data sets have been made available, there has been a significant increase in the potential for incorporating radar data into different machine learning methods for various applications. This review focuses on key performance metrics in mmWave-radar-based sensing, detailed applications, and machine learning techniques used with mmWave radar for a variety of tasks. This article starts out with a discussion of the various working bands of mmWave radars, then moves on to various types of mmWave radars and their key specifications, mmWave radar data interpretation, vast applications in various domains, and, in the end, a discussion of machine learning algorithms applied with radar data for various applications. Our review serves as a practical reference for beginners developing mmWave-radar-based applications by utilizing machine learning techniques. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 4783 KiB  
Article
Laser Safety—What Is the Laser Hazard Distance for an Electro-Optical Imaging System?
by Gunnar Ritt
Sensors 2023, 23(16), 7033; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23167033 - 8 Aug 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2413
Abstract
Laser safety is an important topic. Everybody working with lasers has to follow the long-established occupational safety rules to prevent people from eye damage by accidental irradiation. These rules comprise, for example, the calculation of the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE), as well as [...] Read more.
Laser safety is an important topic. Everybody working with lasers has to follow the long-established occupational safety rules to prevent people from eye damage by accidental irradiation. These rules comprise, for example, the calculation of the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE), as well as the corresponding laser hazard distance, the so-called Nominal Ocular Hazard Distance (NOHD). At exposure levels below the MPE, laser eye dazzling may occur and is described by a quite new concept, leading to definitions such as the Maximum Dazzle Exposure (MDE) and to its corresponding Nominal Ocular Dazzle Distance (NODD). In earlier work, we defined exposure limits for sensors corresponding to those for the human eye: The Maximum Permissible Exposure for a Sensor, MPES, and the Maximum Dazzle Exposure for a Sensor, MDES. In this publication, we report on our continuative work concerning the laser hazard distances arising from these exposure limits. In contrast to the human eye, unexpected results occur for electro-optical imaging systems: For laser irradiances exceeding the exposure limit, MPES, it can happen that the laser hazard zone does not extend directly from the laser source, but only from a specific distance to it. This means that some scenarios are possible where an electro-optical imaging sensor may be in danger of getting damaged within a certain distance to the laser source but is safe from damage when located close to the laser source. This is in contrast to laser eye safety, where it is assumed that the laser hazard zone always extends directly from the laser source. Furthermore, we provide closed-form equations in order to estimate laser hazard distances related to the damaging and dazzling of the electro-optical imaging systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Optical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 7430 KiB  
Article
Estimation of Lens Stray Light with Regard to the Incapacitation of Imaging Sensors—Part 2: Validation
by Bastian Schwarz, Gunnar Ritt and Bernd Eberle
Sensors 2022, 22(23), 9447; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239447 - 2 Dec 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1700
Abstract
Recently, we developed a simple theoretical model for the estimation of the irradiance distribution at the focal plane of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) camera lenses in case of laser illumination. The purpose of such a model is to predict the incapacitation of imaging sensors [...] Read more.
Recently, we developed a simple theoretical model for the estimation of the irradiance distribution at the focal plane of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) camera lenses in case of laser illumination. The purpose of such a model is to predict the incapacitation of imaging sensors when irradiated by laser light. The model is based on closed-form equations that comprise mainly standard parameters of the laser dazzle scenario and those of the main devices involved (laser source, camera lens and imaging sensor). However, the model also includes three non-standard parameters, which describe the scattering of light within the camera lens. In previous work, we have performed measurements to derive these typically unknown scatter parameters for a collection of camera lenses of the Double-Gauss type. In this publication, we compare calculations based on our theoretical model and the measured scatter parameters with the outcome of stray light simulations performed with the optical design software FRED in order to validate the reliability of our theoretical model and of the derived scatter parameters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Optical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 6077 KiB  
Article
Laser Safety Calculations for Imaging Sensors
by Gunnar Ritt
Sensors 2019, 19(17), 3765; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19173765 - 30 Aug 2019
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 7334 | Correction
Abstract
This publication presents an approach to adapt the well-known classical eye-related concept of laser safety calculations on camera sensors as general as possible. The difficulty in this approach is that sensors, in contrast to the human eye, consist of a variety of combinations [...] Read more.
This publication presents an approach to adapt the well-known classical eye-related concept of laser safety calculations on camera sensors as general as possible. The difficulty in this approach is that sensors, in contrast to the human eye, consist of a variety of combinations of optics and detectors. Laser safety calculations related to the human eye target terms like Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) and Nominal Ocular Hazard Distance (NOHD). The MPE describes the maximum allowed level of irradiation at the cornea of the eye to keep the eye safe from damage. The hazard distance corresponding to the MPE is called NOHD. Recently, a laser safety framework regarding the case of human eye dazzling was suggested. For laser eye dazzle, the quantities Maximum Dazzle Exposure (MDE) and the corresponding hazard distance Nominal Ocular Dazzle Distance (NODD) were introduced. Here, an approach is presented to extend laser safety calculations to camera sensors in an analogous way. The main objective thereby was to establish closed-form equations that are as simple as possible to allow also non-expert users to perform such calculations. This is the first time that such investigations have been carried out for this purpose. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Optical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1548 KiB  
Article
Automatic Laser Glare Suppression in Electro-Optical Sensors
by Gunnar Ritt and Bernd Eberle
Sensors 2015, 15(1), 792-802; https://doi.org/10.3390/s150100792 - 5 Jan 2015
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 7148
Abstract
Progress in laser technology has led to very compact but nevertheless powerful laser sources. In the visible and near infrared spectral region, lasers of any wavelength can be purchased. Continuous wave laser sources pose an especially serious threat to the human eye and [...] Read more.
Progress in laser technology has led to very compact but nevertheless powerful laser sources. In the visible and near infrared spectral region, lasers of any wavelength can be purchased. Continuous wave laser sources pose an especially serious threat to the human eye and electro-optical sensors due to their high proliferation and easy availability. The manifold of available wavelengths cannot be covered by conventional safety measures like absorption or interference filters. We present a protection concept for electro-optical sensors to suppress dazzling in the visible spectral region. The key element of the concept is the use of a digital micromirror device (DMD) in combination with wavelength multiplexing. This approach allows selective spectral filtering in defined regions of interest in the scene. The system offers the possibility of automatic attenuation of dazzling laser radiation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Show Figures

16 pages, 1141 KiB  
Article
Automatic Suppression of Intense Monochromatic Light in Electro-Optical Sensors
by Gunnar Ritt and Bernd Eberle
Sensors 2012, 12(10), 14113-14128; https://doi.org/10.3390/s121014113 - 19 Oct 2012
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 8458
Abstract
Electro-optical imaging sensors are widely distributed and used for many different tasks. Due to technical improvements, their pixel size has been steadily decreasing, resulting in a reduced saturation capacity. As a consequence, this progress makes them susceptible to intense point light sources. Developments [...] Read more.
Electro-optical imaging sensors are widely distributed and used for many different tasks. Due to technical improvements, their pixel size has been steadily decreasing, resulting in a reduced saturation capacity. As a consequence, this progress makes them susceptible to intense point light sources. Developments in laser technology have led to very compact and powerful laser sources of any wavelength in the visible and near infrared spectral region, offered as laser pointers. The manifold of wavelengths makes it difficult to encounter sensor saturation over the complete operating waveband by conventional measures like absorption or interference filters. We present a concept for electro-optical sensors to suppress overexposure in the visible spectral region. The key element of the concept is a spatial light modulator in combination with wavelength multiplexing. This approach allows spectral filtering within a localized area in the field of view of the sensor. The system offers the possibility of automatic reduction of overexposure by monochromatic laser radiation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Sensors Technology in Germany 2012)
Show Figures

Back to TopTop