Search Results (4)

Background: The advent of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) had an essential role in the expansion of newborn screening (NBS) for different inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs). Nowadays, almost 50 IEMs are screened in Italy. The use of second-tier tests (2-TTs) in NBS minimizes the false positive rate; nevertheless, the metabolic profile is influenced not only by the genome but also by environmental factors and clinical variables. We reviewed the MS/MS NBS data from over 37,000 newborns (of which 8% required 2-TTs) screened in the Italian Abruzzo region to evaluate the impact of neonatal and maternal variables on propionate-related primary biomarker levels. Methods: Expanded NBS and 2-TT analyses were performed using MS/MS and liquid chromatography–MS/MS methods. We set up layered cut-offs dividing all 37,000 newborns into categories. Statistical analysis was used to create alarm thresholds for NBS-positive samples. Statistically significant differences were found in both neonatal and maternal conditions based on the 2-TTs carried out. According to the stratified cut-offs, only 1.47% of the newborns would have required a 2-TT while still retaining the ability to recognize the true-positive case of methylmalonic acidemia with homocystinuria, which has been identified by NBS. To further support the clinical applicability, we performed an external evaluation considering nine positive cases from an extra-regional neonatal population, confirming the potential of our model. Interestingly, the setting of alarm thresholds and their application would allow for establishing the degree of priority/urgency for 2-TTs. Conclusions: Tailoring NBS by customized cut-offs may enhance the application of precision medicine, focusing on true-positive cases and also reducing analysis costs and times. Full article

In The Netherlands, newborn screening (NBS) for tyrosinemia type 1 (TT1) uses dried blood spot (DBS) succinylacetone (SUAC) as a biomarker. However, high false-positive (FP) rates and a false-negative (FN) case show that the Dutch TT1 NBS protocol is suboptimal. In search of optimization options, we evaluated the protocols used by other NBS programs and their performance. We distributed an online survey to NBS program representatives worldwide (N = 41). Questions focused on the organization and performance of the programs and on changes since implementation. Thirty-three representatives completed the survey. TT1 incidence ranged from 1/13,636 to 1/750,000. Most NBS samples are taken between 36 and 72 h after birth. Most used biomarkers were DBS SUAC (78.9%), DBS Tyrosine (Tyr; 5.3%), or DBS Tyr with second tier SUAC (15.8%). The pooled median cut-off for SUAC was 1.50 µmol/L (range 0.3–7.0 µmol/L). The median cut-off from programs using laboratory-developed tests was significantly higher (2.63 µmol/L) than the medians from programs using commercial kits (range 1.0–1.7 µmol/L). The pooled median cut-off for Tyr was 216 µmol/L (range 120–600 µmol/L). Overall positive predictive values were 25.9% for SUAC, 1.2% for Tyr solely, and 90.1% for Tyr + SUAC. One FN result was reported for TT1 NBS using SUAC, while three FN results were reported for TT1 NBS using Tyr. The NBS programs for TT1 vary worldwide in terms of analytical methods, biochemical markers, and cut-off values. There is room for improvement through method standardization, cut-off adaptation, and integration of new biomarkers. Further enhancement is likely to be achieved by the application of post-analytical tools. Full article

The Portuguese Neonatal Screening Program (PNSP) conducts nationwide screening for rare diseases, covering nearly 100% of neonates and screening for 28 disorders, including 24 inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs). The study’s purpose is to assess the epidemiology of the screened metabolic diseases and to evaluate the impact of second-tier testing (2TT) within the PNSP. From 2004 to 2022, 1,764,830 neonates underwent screening using tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) to analyze amino acids and acylcarnitines in dried blood spot samples. 2TT was applied when necessary. Neonates with profiles indicating an IEM were reported to a reference treatment center, and subsequent biochemical and molecular studies were conducted for diagnostic confirmation. Among the screened neonates, 677 patients of IEM were identified, yielding an estimated birth prevalence of 1:2607 neonates. The introduction of 2TT significantly reduced false positives for various disorders, and 59 maternal cases were also detected. This study underscores the transformative role of MS/MS in neonatal screening, emphasizing the positive impact of 2TT in enhancing sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. Our data highlight the efficiency and robustness of neonatal screening for IEM in Portugal, contributing to early and life-changing diagnoses. Full article

The expansion of the recommend uniform screening panel to include more than 50 primary and secondary target conditions has resulted in a substantial increase of false positive results. As an alternative to subjective manipulation of cutoff values and overutilization of molecular testing, here we describe the performance outcome of an algorithm for disorders of methionine, cobalamin, and propionate metabolism that includes: (1) first tier screening inclusive of the broadest available spectrum of markers measured by tandem mass spectrometry; (2) integration of all results into a score of likelihood of disease for each target condition calculated by post-analytical interpretive tools created byCollaborative Laboratory Integrated Reports (CLIR), a multivariate pattern recognition software; and (3) further evaluation of abnormal scores by a second tier test measuring homocysteine, methylmalonic acid, and methylcitric acid. This approach can consistently reduce false positive rates to a <0.01% level, which is the threshold of precision newborn screening. We postulate that broader adoption of this algorithm could lead to substantial savings in health care expenditures. More importantly, it could prevent the stress and anxiety experienced by many families when faced with an abnormal newborn screening result that is later resolved as a false positive outcome. Full article