Search Results (10)

Introduction: Arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) has evolved over the last 5 years, with many trajectory strategies emerging. Innovation has outpaced data generation on the safety and efficacy of novel SIJ arthrodesis techniques. This retrospective review of the use of a SiLO TFX SIJ fusion system provides 12-month post-implant outcome data that can be compared with other techniques from published literature. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients that underwent the SiLO TFX sacroiliac joint fusion procedure at eight sites with data on pain reduction and functional improvement from baseline, as measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), along with some safety and device integrity assessments recorded at 12 months post-implant. Safety was assessed by identifying key serious adverse events (bleeding, infection, nerve injury), and device integrity was assessed by evaluating misplaced or malfunctioned devices. ODI and NRS outcomes were compared with published rates from the literature. Results: Between 16 March 2023 and 20 February 2024, 42 subjects with 12-month ODI data available were enrolled. The subjects had a mean age of 60 ± 11 years, and 71% were female. The mean ODI score of 33 ± 15 at baseline improved to 17 ± 11 at 12 months, with a statistically significant improvement from baseline of 16 ± 15 (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, 52% of subjects had a 15-point absolute ODI improvement. Mean NRS of 7.1 ± 2.8 at baseline improved to 2.9 ± 2.2 at 12 months with a statistically significant reduction in pain of 4.2 ± 3.4 (p < 0.0001). No key serious adverse events or device integrity complications were noted. Subgroup analyses for a cohort of subjects with baseline ODI ≥ 30 and VAS pain ≥ 50 demonstrated that performance was similar to that in previously published literature with a mean improvement in ODI of 23.3 ± 12.7 (p < 0.0001) with 78% of subjects achieving a 15-point improvement at 12 months, and mean NRS improving by 4.7 ± 3.0 (p < 0.0001) with 88.9% achieving an improvement of 2 points. Conclusions: This data supports the safety and efficacy of SiLO TFX for SIJ fusion. The retrospective outcomes are comparable to those published for lateral-approach SIJ fusion. As follow up is limited to 12 months in this retrospective dataset; long-term fusion and cost-effectiveness remain to be addressed. Prospective, randomized controlled trials with a larger cohort are needed further to compare SiLO TFX to other available SIJ fusion techniques. Full article

Background: Chronic lumbopelvic pain is often linked to sacroiliac joint dysfunction, where the joint’s complex structure and biomechanics complicate diagnosis and treatment. Variability in load distribution and ligament stabilization within the pelvic ring further contributes to challenges in managing this condition. This study aims to develop a finite element model of the “lumbar spine–sacrum–pelvis” system to analyze the effects of lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, and asymmetrical articular gaps on stress and strain in the sacroiliac joint. Methods: A three-dimensional model was constructed using CT and MRI data, including key stabilizing ligaments. Sacral slope angles of 30°, 60°, and 85° were used to simulate varying lordosis, while pelvic tilt was introduced through a 6° lateral rotation. Results: The analysis revealed that sacral slope, ligament integrity, and joint symmetry significantly influence stress distribution. Hyperlordosis led to critical stress levels in interosseous and iliolumbar ligaments, exceeding failure thresholds. Asymmetrical gaps and pelvic tilt further altered the sacral rotation axis, increasing stress on sacroiliac joint ligaments. Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of maintaining sacroiliac joint symmetry and lumbar–pelvic alignment to minimize stress on stabilizing ligaments, suggesting that treatment should focus on restoring alignment and joint symmetry. Full article

Background: Pain in the sacroiliac joint is the most prevalent and often overlooked. The sacroiliac joints are thought to be sources of pain in roughly 10% to 25% of patients with chronic lower back pain. Due to the biomechanical nature of the joint, muscle imbalance is the most important cause of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. The hamstring and gluteus medius are the primary muscles involved in postural dysfunction-related muscle imbalance; however, the quadratus lumborum’s role in the compensatory mechanism is becoming more apparent, and its potential for treatment in conjunction with gluteus medius strengthening has not yet been investigated. Gluteus medius exercises, along with conventional treatment, are routinely given to patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction; however, the aim of this study is to explore the additional effects of the muscle energy technique (MET) on the quadratus lumborum along with strengthening of the gluteus medius on pain, disability and quality of life of patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Methods: Using a computer-generated random number table, seventy patients with unilateral sacroiliac joint pain were divided equally and randomly into two groups. Prior to initiating treatment, baseline measurements were taken using a hand-held dynamometer, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI-U) and short form 36-item survey (SF-36v2) to assess strength, pain, functional disability and quality of life, respectively. Over the course of four weeks, all patients received twelve sessions, and both the pre- and post-intervention outcome measures were documented. Results: After 4 weeks of treatment, both groups showed statistically significant (p < 0.005) mean improvements in muscle strength, pain, disability and quality of life before and after intervention. However, the mean improvements in post-intervention on a dynamometer, VAS, ODI and SF-36 were better in the MET with exercise group (METGME) as compared to the conventional group with exercise (CTGME), with a larger effect size. Conclusions: The muscle energy technique, applied to the quadratus lumborum in combination with gluteus medius strengthening, is more effective clinically and significantly in improving pain, disability and quality of life in comparison to conventional treatment of sacroiliac joints with gluteus medius exercises. Full article

Background and Objectives: Chronic low back pain, frequently attributed to Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction (SIJD), remains a prevalent concern in orthopedic and physiotherapy arenas. Despite the recognition of motor control exercises (MCEs) and balance training (BT) as potential rehabilitative measures, studies elucidating their combined efficiency for SIJD are scarce. This research study aimed to ascertain the combined and individual efficacies of MCE and BT in alleviating SIJD symptoms. Methods: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling 120 SIJD-diagnosed patients aged 30–60 years. Participants were randomly allocated into four groups: MCEs alone, BT alone, combined MCEs and BT, and a control group receiving usual care. Interventions spanned 12 weeks, with evaluations at the start and end and a 24-week follow-up. Primary outcomes encompass pain intensity (assessed via Visual Analog Scale), functional disability (utilizing the Oswestry Disability Index), and life quality (using the Short Form-36). Results: Post a 12-week intervention, participants receiving combined MCE and BT demonstrated substantial improvements in VAS (Median: 3.5, IQR: 2–5; p = 0.0035), ODI (Median: 15%, IQR: 10–20%; p = 0.0035), and SF-36 scores (Median: 70, IQR: 65–75; p = 0.0035) compared to baseline. In contrast, standalone MCE or BT and control groups exhibited lesser efficacy. By the 24-week follow-up, the combined group maintained their gains, outperforming the other groups. The research tools employed showed high reliability with Cronbach’s alpha >0.85. Conclusions: Our findings underscore the superior efficacy of integrating motor control exercises (MCEs) and balance training (BT) for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction (SIJD)-related chronic low back pain. This combined approach promises enhanced patient outcomes, highlighting its potential as a primary strategy in SIJD management. Future studies should further explore its long-term benefits and integration with other therapeutic modalities. Full article

Sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction can lead to debilitating pain but can be treated with minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF). This treatment is commonly performed using 2D fluoroscopic guidance. This makes placing the implants without damaging surrounding neural structures challenging. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) using simulated fluoroscopic images may improve intraoperative guidance. This article describes a workflow with VSP in SIJF using simulated fluoroscopic images and evaluates achieved implant placement accuracy. Ten interventions were performed on 10 patients by the same surgeon, resulting in a total of 30 implants; the median age was 39 years, and all patients were female. The overall mean implant placement accuracy was 4.9 ± 1.26 mm and 4.0 ± 1.44°. There were no malpositioning complications. VSP helped the surgeon understand the anatomy and determine the optimal position and length of the implants. The planned positions of the implants could be reproduced in surgery with what appears to be a clinically acceptable level of accuracy. Full article

(1) Background: Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion is the preferred surgical intervention to treat chronically severe pain associated with SIJ degeneration and dysfunction. (2) Methods: This paper details the ten-step surgical procedure associated with the postero-inferior approach using the PsiF™ DNA Sacroiliac Joint Fusion System. (3) Results: The posterior surgical approach with an inferior operative trajectory (postero-inferior) utilizes easily identifiable landmarks to provide the safest, most direct access to the articular joint space for transfixing device placement. Implanting the device through the subchondral bone provides maximum fixation and stabilization of the joint by utilizing an optimal amount of cortical bone–implant interface. Approaching the joint from the inferior trajectory also places the implant perpendicular to the S1 endplate at a “pivot point” near the sacral axis of rotation, which addresses the most significant motion of the joint. (4) Conclusions: Further observational data from real-world clinical use are encouraged to further validate this procedure as the surgical preference for minimally invasive SIJ fusion. Full article

This Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved retrospective observational protocol aims to report the safety and efficacy of birth tissue allografts applied in 38 patients with treatment-resistant sacroiliac (SI) joint pain. The research methodology consisted of an observational recording of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), which measure pain, stiffness, and physical function. No adverse events or adverse reactions were observed in the 38 patients. Statistically significant improvements in NPRS and WOMAC scores of the affected SI joint were reported after 90 days. The observational data suggests that Wharton’s jelly allograft applications are safe, minimally invasive, and efficacious. They may present an alternative to surgery for patients who fail conservative and procedural management of pain originating from chondral cartilage degeneration of the SI joint. Full article

Neck and back pain is increasingly prevalent, and has increased exponentially in recent years. As more resources are dedicated to the diagnosis of pain conditions, it is increasingly important that the diagnostic techniques used are as precise and accurate as possible. Traditional diagnostic methods rely heavily upon patient history and physical examination to determine the most appropriate treatments and/or imaging studies. Though traditional means of diagnosis remain a necessity, in many cases, correlation with positive or negative responses to injections may further enhance diagnostic specificity, and improve outcomes by preventing unnecessary treatments or surgeries. This narrative review aims to present the most recent literature describing the diagnostic validity of precision injections, as well as their impact on surgical planning and outcomes. Diagnostic injections are discussed in terms of facet arthropathy, lumbar radiculopathy, discogenic pain and discography, and sacroiliac joint dysfunction. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the use of diagnostic local anesthetic injections or nerve blocks to aid in diagnosis. Spinal injections add valuable objective information that can potentially improve diagnostic precision, guide treatment strategies, and aid in patient selection for invasive surgical interventions. Full article

Background and Objectives: Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) generally refers to pain in the lower back due to abnormal sacroiliac joint movement, either from hypomobility or hypermobility. It is considered to be the principal cause in up to 40% of low back pain cases. In literature, it emerges that the “fascia”, by its anatomical continuity, if altered or densified in different regions of the body with respect to the sacroiliac joint and its surroundings, may have a fundamental role in the genesis of SIJD and low back pain. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of incorporating a single session of Fascial Manipulation^®-Stecco method^®, treating the muscular fasciae at distance from the painful region. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with acute and chronic sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) were recruited (16 males and 4 females, mean age of 46.6 ± 12.98 years). Patients underwent a predefined assessment protocol, followed by an evaluation of myofascial pain and subsequent manipulation of the fascia at points at least 20 cm away from the posterior inferior iliac spines (PIIS). Each patient underwent three pain evaluations: pre-treatment (t0), post-treatment (t1), and at a 1-month follow-up (t2). For the evaluation in t0, t1 the numerical rating scale (NRS) for the intensity of pain and the algometer for the pain threshold at the PIIS were used; in t2 only the NRS scale. Results: The results obtained by comparing the algometer measurements with the NRS values between t0 and t1 were in both cases statistically significant (p < 0.0001), whereas the comparison between the NRS values at t1 and at t2 was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: A single Fascial Manipulation treatment, even when applied at least 20 cm from the PIIS, can potentially decrease pain around the SIJ. The inclusion of this type of approach in SIJD can allow for improved patient management, better tolerance for other treatments and a more rapid application of pain-free exercise programs. Full article

Background: The study of injuries stemming from sacroiliac dysfunction in athletes has been discussed in many papers. However, the treatment of this issue through thrust and muscle-energy techniques has hardly been researched. The objective of our research is to compare the effectiveness of thrust technique to that of energy muscle techniques in the resolution of sacroiliac joint blockage or dysfunction in middle-distance running athletes. Methods: A quasi-experimental design with three measures in time (pre-intervention, intervention 1, final intervention after one month from the first intervention) was made. The sample consisted of 60 adult athletes from an Athletic club, who were dealing with sacroiliac joint dysfunction. The sample was randomly divided into three groups of 20 participants (43 men and 17 women). One intervention group was treated with the thrust technique, another intervention group was treated with the muscle–energy technique, and the control group received treatment by means of a simulated technique. A prior assessment of the range of motion was performed by means of a seated forward flexion test, a standing forward flexion test, and the Gillet test. After observing the dysfunction, the corresponding technique was performed on each intervention group. The control group underwent a simulated technique. A second intervention took place a month later, in order to ascertain possible increased effectiveness. Results: Statistically significant differences were found between the muscle energy technique (MET) and muscle energy groups compared with the placebo group in both interventions (p = 0.000), with a significant reduction in positive dysfunction (initially 20 in all groups, eight in MET group, and two in thrust group in the final intervention). Comparing the changes in time, only the thrust group obtained statistically significant differences (p = 0.000, with a reduction of positive dysfunction, starting at 20 positives, five positive in the initial intervention and two positive in the final intervention) and when comparing both techniques, it was observed that between the first intervention and the final intervention, the thrust technique was significantly higher than the MET technique (p = 0.032). Conclusions: The thrust manipulation technique is more effective in the treatment of sacroiliac dysfunction than the energy muscle technique, in both cases obtaining satisfactory results with far middle-distance running athletes. Finally, the thrust technique showed positive results in the first intervention and also in the long term, in contrast to the MET technique that only obtained changes after the first intervention. Full article