Search Results (3)

The canopy chlorophyll content (CCC) and leaf area index (LAI) are both essential indicators for crop growth monitoring and yield estimation. The PROSAIL model, which couples the properties optique spectrales des feuilles (PROSPECT) and scattering by arbitrarily inclined leaves (SAIL) radiative transfer models, is commonly used for the quantitative retrieval of crop parameters; however, its homogeneous canopy assumption limits its accuracy, especially in the case of multiple crop categories. The adjusted average leaf angle (ALA_adj), which can be parameterized for a specific crop type, increases the applicability of the PROSAIL model for specific crop types with a non-uniform canopy and has the potential to enhance the performance of PROSAIL-coupled hybrid methods. In this study, the PROSAIL-D model was used to generate the ALA_adj values of wheat, soybean, and maize crops based on ground-measured spectra, the LAI, and the leaf chlorophyll content (LCC). The results revealed ALA_adj values of 62 degrees for wheat, 45 degrees for soybean, and 60 degrees for maize. Support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), extremely randomized trees regression (ETR), the gradient boosting regression tree (GBRT), and stacking learning (STL) were applied to simulated data of the ALA_adj in 50-band data to retrieve the CCC and LAI of the crops. The results demonstrated that the estimation accuracy of singular crop parameters, particularly the crop LAI, was greatly enhanced by the five machine learning methods on the basis of data simulated with the ALA_adj. Regarding the estimation results of mixed crops, the machine learning algorithms using ALA_adj datasets resulted in estimations of CCC (RMSE: RFR = 51.1 μg cm⁻², ETR = 54.7 μg cm⁻², GBRT = 54.9 μg cm⁻², STL = 48.3 μg cm⁻²) and LAI (RMSE: SVR = 0.91, RFR = 1.03, ETR = 1.05, GBRT = 1.05, STL = 0.97), that outperformed the estimations without using the ALA_adj (namely CCC RMSE: RFR = 93.0 μg cm⁻², ETR = 60.1 μg cm⁻², GBRT = 60.0 μg cm⁻², STL = 68.5 μg cm⁻² and LAI RMSE: SVR = 2.10, RFR = 2.28, ETR = 1.67, GBRT = 1.66, STL = 1.51). Similar findings were obtained using the suggested method in conjunction with 19-band data, demonstrating the promising potential of this method to estimate the CCC and LAI of crops at the satellite scale. Full article

The leaf area index (LAI) is an essential indicator used in crop growth monitoring. In the study, a hybrid inversion method, which combined a physical model with a statistical method, was proposed to estimate the crop LAI. The simulated compact high-resolution imaging spectrometer (CHRIS) canopy spectral crop reflectance datasets were generated using the PROSAIL model (the coupling of PROSPECT leaf optical properties model and Scattering by Arbitrarily Inclined Leaves model) and the CHRIS band response function. Partial least squares (PLS) was then used to reduce the dimension of the simulated spectral data. Using the principal components (PCs) of PLS as the model inputs, the hybrid inversion models were built using various modeling algorithms, including the backpropagation artificial neural network (BP-ANN), least squares support vector regression (LS-SVR), and random forest regression (RFR). Finally, remote sensing mapping of the CHRIS data was achieved with the hybrid model to test the inversion accuracy of LAI estimates. The validation result yielded an accuracy of R² = 0.939 and normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) = 6.474% for the PLS_RFR model, which indicated that the crops LAI could be estimated accurately by using spectral feature extraction and a hybrid inversion strategy. The results showed that the model based on principal components extracted by PLS had a good estimation accuracy and noise immunity and was the preferred method for LAI estimation. Furthermore, the comparative analysis results of various datasets showed that prior knowledge could improve the precision of the retrieved LAI, and using this information to constrain parameters (e.g., chlorophyll content or LAI), which make important contributions to the spectra, is the key to this improvement. In addition, among the PLS, BP-ANN, LS-SVR, and RFR methods, RFR was the optimal modeling algorithm in the paper, as indicated by the high R² and low NRMSE in various datasets. Full article

Leaf area index (LAI) is an essential vegetation parameter that represents the light energy utilization and vegetation canopy structure. As the only in-operation hyperspectral satellite launched by China, GF-5 is potentially useful for accurate LAI estimation. However, there is no research focus on evaluating GF-5 data for LAI estimation. Hyperspectral remote sensing data contains abundant information about the reflective characteristics of vegetation canopies, but these abound data also easily result in a dimensionality curse. Therefore, feature selection (FS) is necessary to reduce data redundancy to achieve more reliable estimations. Currently, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been widely used for FS. Moreover, the same ML algorithm is usually conducted for both FS and regression in LAI estimation. However, no evidence suggests that this is the optimal solution. Therefore, this study focuses on evaluating the capacity of GF-5 spectral reflectance for estimating LAI and the performances of different combination of FS and ML algorithms. Firstly, the PROSAIL model, which coupled leaf optical properties model PROSPECT and the scattering by arbitrarily inclined leaves (SAIL) model, was used to generate simulated GF-5 reflectance data under different vegetation and soil conditions, and then three FS methods, including random forest (RF), K-means clustering (K-means) and mean impact value (MIV), and three ML algorithms, including random forest regression (RFR), back propagation neural network (BPNN) and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) were used to develop nine LAI estimation models. The FS process was conducted twice using different strategies: Firstly, three FS methods were conducted to search the lowest dimension number, which maintained the estimation accuracy of all bands. Then, the sequential backward selection (SBS) method was used to eliminate the bands having minimal impact on LAI estimation accuracy. Finally, three best estimation models were selected and evaluated using reference LAI. The results showed that although the RF_RFR model (RF used for feature selection and RFR used for regression) achieved reliable LAI estimates (coefficient of determination (R²) = 0.828, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.839), the poor performance (R² = 0.763, RMSE = 0.987) of the MIV_BPNN model (MIV used for feature selection and BPNN used for regression) suggested using feature selection and regression conducted by the same ML algorithm could not always ensure an optimal estimation. Moreover, RF selection preserved the most informative bands for LAI estimation so that each ML regression method could achieve satisfactory estimation results. Finally, the results indicated that the RF_KNN model (RF used as feature selection and KNN used for regression) with seven GF-5 spectral band reflectance achieved the better estimation results than others when validated by simulated data (R² = 0.834, RMSE = 0.824) and actual reference LAI (R² = 0.659, RMSE = 0.697). Full article