Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = radiation-associated dysphagia

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 482 KiB  
Case Report
The Potential Role of Bio Extra Virgin Olive Oil (BEVOO) in Recovery from HPV 16-Induced Tonsil Cancer: An Exploratory Case Study
by Ivan Uher, Eva Bergendyová, Janka Poráčová and Jarmila Bernasovská
Healthcare 2025, 13(8), 944; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13080944 - 19 Apr 2025
Viewed by 588
Abstract
The human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV 16) is a high-risk human papillomavirus strain commonly associated with oropharyngeal cancers, including lymph node involvement. The treatment for HPV 16-related tonsil cancer, commonly involving surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, presents significant challenges. Complications such as oral mucositis, [...] Read more.
The human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV 16) is a high-risk human papillomavirus strain commonly associated with oropharyngeal cancers, including lymph node involvement. The treatment for HPV 16-related tonsil cancer, commonly involving surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, presents significant challenges. Complications such as oral mucositis, xerostomia, dysphagia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, impaired gustatory function, and significant weight loss frequently arise, leading to reduced nutritional intake, impaired healing, and recovery progression. These challenges underscore the need for supportive interventions to enhance rehabilitation and the post-recovery period, improve treatment tolerance, and maintain quality of life. Objective: This single-subject study examines a 67-year-old male patient diagnosed with a T1N3b (small primary tumor with advanced lump node involvement) associated with HPV 16 positivity, indicating a virus-associated oncogenesis. Methods: The patient underwent radiation therapy and chemotherapy, leading to treatment-associated side effects. After having dietary drinks for daily nourishment, the patient routinely incorporated oral bio extra virgin olive oil (BEVOO) to cope with indicated challenges. Results: Body composition and metabolic parameters showed treatment-induced declines, followed by substantial but not complete recovery during follow-up examination. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores reflected gradual improvements in dysphagia, xerostomia, mucositis, and subtle but ongoing enhancement of the dysgeusia, gustatory perception, and oral palatability. The BEVOO supplementation and mindfulness were associated with positive recovery trends. Additional variables could have impacted the outcomes, preceding and throughout treatment, including the patient’s cognitive and somatic health, environmental conditions, dietary habits, individual attitudes toward recovery, physical activity, and patient way of life. Conclusions: These results emphasize the need for additional research employing a comprehensive, multi-factorial framework that accounts for the complex interplay of physiological, psycho-social, and environmental contributors. More extensive, more diverse studies are essential to confirm these observations and substantiate the role of BEVOO as a supportive intervention in cancer recovery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1082 KiB  
Article
Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in Head and Neck Cancer Patients with Late Radiation-Associated Dysphagia: Swallowing Safety, Efficacy, and Dysphagia Phenotype
by Marco Gitto, Francesco Mozzanica, Vincenzo Porpiglia, Luca Morelli, Aurora Ninfa, Alessandro Selvagio, Sara Rocca, Nicole Pizzorni and Antonio Schindler
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(4), 233; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040233 - 16 Apr 2025
Viewed by 841
Abstract
Late radiation-associated dysphagia (late-RAD) remains a challenge in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivorship, despite advancements in treatment methods. Although Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) stands as the preferred diagnostic approach for oropharyngeal dysphagia assessment in the HNC population, current studies lack [...] Read more.
Late radiation-associated dysphagia (late-RAD) remains a challenge in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivorship, despite advancements in treatment methods. Although Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) stands as the preferred diagnostic approach for oropharyngeal dysphagia assessment in the HNC population, current studies lack a FEES-derived swallowing parameter characterization and phenotypic classification within this specific cohort. This study sought to employ FEES-based assessment to characterize swallowing safety and efficacy profiles, identify distinct phenotypes in HNC patients suffering from late-RAD, and examine potential correlations between safety and efficacy parameters. A retrospective analysis included twenty-four post-radiotherapy HNC patients evaluated using standardized FEES protocols across three bolus consistencies (liquid, semisolid, and solid). Swallowing safety was quantified using the Penetration–Aspiration Scale (PAS), while efficacy was measured via the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS). Additionally, six distinct dysphagia phenotypes were characterized within the cohort. Propulsion deficit was the predominant phenotype (92%), followed by delayed pharyngeal phase (37.5%) and protective deficit (25%), with 46% of patients exhibiting multiple phenotypes. Unsafe swallowing occurred most frequently with liquid consistency (62.5%), while residue was most prevalent with semisolid (82.6% valleculae, 52.2% pyriform sinuses) and solid consistencies (92.3% valleculae, 53.8% pyriform sinuses). Significant correlations were found between penetration–aspiration and pharyngeal residue scores across consistencies (p < 0.05). FEES examination revealed distinct phenotypes in late radiation-associated dysphagia, with a predominance of propulsion deficit and significant interdependence between safety and efficacy parameters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Head and Neck Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 4161 KiB  
Case Report
Head and Neck Low Grade Chondrosarcoma—A Rare Entity
by Camil Ciprian Mireștean, Cristiana Eugenia Simionescu, Roxana Irina Iancu, Mihai Cosmin Stan, Dragoș Petru Teodor Iancu and Florinel Bădulescu
Diagnostics 2023, 13(19), 3026; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13193026 - 22 Sep 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2095
Abstract
Chondrosarcoma represents approximately 0.1% of all neoplasms of the head and neck and is considered a rare disease with a relatively good prognosis. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate is estimated at 70–80%, being considered a disease with a low growth rate. Approximately [...] Read more.
Chondrosarcoma represents approximately 0.1% of all neoplasms of the head and neck and is considered a rare disease with a relatively good prognosis. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate is estimated at 70–80%, being considered a disease with a low growth rate. Approximately 13% of all cases of chondrosarcoma are located in the region of the head and neck. We present the case of a 30-year-old patient without a medical history who reported dysphagia, swallowing difficulty, neck mass sensation and dysphonia that started insidiously after an upper respiratory tract infection. Subsequently, the patient was diagnosed with a low-grade glosso-epiglottic region chondrosarcoma and was multimodally treated with surgery followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The radiation treatment was delivered with a Rokus M40 former Soviet Union cobalt machine without any image guidance capabilities. The inability to obtain resection margin information justified an aggressive adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The early loss from the oncological record without recurrence of the disease could be associated in this case with the consequence of a major complication, of which we could assume an aspiration pneumonia secondary to a dysphagia associated with an aggressive multidisciplinary treatment. Large tumor size and positive resection margins (R1 resection) are risk factors that support an intensive adjuvant approach in order to reduce the risk of recurrence, but the low grade of tumor associated with a lower risk of recurrence as well as the adverse events (AE) of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy justify a more reserved therapeutic approach. Taking into account the longer life expectancy of these patients, it is recommended to use a more conformal irradiation technique in order to reduce doses to radiosensitive structures as well as to omit elective neck irradiation, taking into account the lower risk of lymph node involvement. The lack of guidelines, which include very rare tumors including low grade chondrosarcoma of the head and neck, makes a unified approach difficult, but the data presented in case reports could contribute to choosing the regimen that offers the best therapeutic ratio. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Diagnosis and Oncological Treatments in Romania)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 257 KiB  
Review
Endoscopic Stenting for Malignant Dysphagia in Patients with Esophageal Cancer
by Ryu Ishihara
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(7), 5984-5994; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30070447 - 21 Jun 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4147
Abstract
Malignant dysphagia is a common problem in patients with esophageal cancer. Endoscopic stenting can resolve dysphagia caused by malignant stricture; however, controversy exists regarding the use of esophageal stenting for the treatment of malignant stricture, including whether stenting or radiotherapy is superior, whether [...] Read more.
Malignant dysphagia is a common problem in patients with esophageal cancer. Endoscopic stenting can resolve dysphagia caused by malignant stricture; however, controversy exists regarding the use of esophageal stenting for the treatment of malignant stricture, including whether stenting or radiotherapy is superior, whether stenting before or after radiotherapy is safe, whether stenting before or after chemotherapy is safe, and whether low-radial-force stents are safer than conventional stents. Among treatment options for malignant dysphagia, stenting may have some disadvantages in terms of pain relief and the risk of adverse events compared with radiotherapy and in terms of survival compared with gastrostomy. Additionally, the risk of stent-related adverse events is significantly associated with prior radiotherapy. The risk of perforation is especially high when a radiation dose of >40 Gy is delivered to the esophagus after stenting, whereas perforation is not associated with prior chemotherapy or additional chemotherapy after stenting. Nevertheless, stenting remains an important palliative option, especially for patients with a short life expectancy and a strong desire for oral intake, because stenting can facilitate a more rapid improvement in dysphagia than radiotherapy or gastrostomy. The application of a low-radial-force stent should be considered to reduce the risk of adverse events, especially in patients with prior radiotherapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastrointestinal Oncology)
11 pages, 276 KiB  
Article
Investigating Predictive Factors of Dysphagia and Treatment Prolongation in Patients with Oral Cavity or Oropharyngeal Cancer Receiving Radiation Therapy Concurrently with Chemotherapy
by Petros Alexidis, Pavlos Kolias, Vaia Mentesidou, Maria Topalidou, Efstathios Kamperis, Vasileios Giannouzakos, Konstantinos Efthymiadis, Petros Bangeas and Eleni Timotheadou
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(5), 5168-5178; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30050391 - 19 May 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3321
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) treatment for head and neck cancer has been associated with dysphagia manifestation leading to worse outcomes and decrease in life quality. In this study, we investigated factors leading to dysphagia and treatment prolongation in patients with primaries arising from oral [...] Read more.
Radiation therapy (RT) treatment for head and neck cancer has been associated with dysphagia manifestation leading to worse outcomes and decrease in life quality. In this study, we investigated factors leading to dysphagia and treatment prolongation in patients with primaries arising from oral cavity or oropharynx that were submitted to radiation therapy concurrently with chemotherapy. The records of patients with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer that received RT treatment to the primary and bilateral neck lymph nodes concurrently with chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the potential correlation between explanatory variables and the primary (dysphagia ≥ 2) and secondary (prolongation of total treatment duration ≥ 7 days) outcomes of interest. The Toxicity Criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) were used to evaluate dysphagia. A total of 160 patients were included in the study. Age mean was 63.31 (SD = 8.24). Dysphagia grade ≥ 2 was observed in 76 (47.5%) patients, while 32 (20%) experienced treatment prolongation ≥ 7 days. The logistic regression analysis showed that the volume in the primary site of disease that received dose ≥ 60 Gy (≥118.75 cc, p < 0.001, (OR = 8.43, 95% CI [3.51–20.26]) and mean dose to the pharyngeal constrictor muscles > 40.6 Gy (p < 0.001, OR = 11.58, 95% CI [4.84–27.71]) were significantly associated with dysphagia grade ≥ 2. Treatment prolongation ≥ 7 days was predicted by higher age (p = 0.007, OR = 1.079, 95% CI [1.021–1.140]) and development of grade ≥ 2 dysphagia (p = 0.005, OR = 4.02, 95% CI [1.53–10.53]). In patients with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer that receive bilateral neck irradiation concurrently with chemotherapy, constrictors mean dose and the volume in the primary site receiving ≥ 60 Gy should be kept below 40.6 Gy and 118.75 cc, respectively, whenever possible. Elderly patients or those that are considered at high risk for dysphagia manifestation are more likely to experience treatment prolongation ≥ 7 days and they should be closely monitored during treatment course for nutritional support and pain management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Head and Neck Oncology)
17 pages, 346 KiB  
Review
Molecular and Neural Mechanism of Dysphagia Due to Cancer
by Ikuko Okuni, Yuta Otsubo and Satoru Ebihara
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(13), 7033; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22137033 - 29 Jun 2021
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4891
Abstract
Cancer is one of the most common causes of death worldwide. Along with the advances in diagnostic technology achieved through industry–academia partnerships, the survival rate of cancer patients has improved dramatically through treatments that include surgery, radiation therapy, and pharmacotherapy. This has increased [...] Read more.
Cancer is one of the most common causes of death worldwide. Along with the advances in diagnostic technology achieved through industry–academia partnerships, the survival rate of cancer patients has improved dramatically through treatments that include surgery, radiation therapy, and pharmacotherapy. This has increased the population of cancer “survivors” and made cancer survivorship an important part of life for patients. The senses of taste and smell during swallowing and cachexia play important roles in dysphagia associated with nutritional disorders in cancer patients. Cancerous lesions in the brain can cause dysphagia. Taste and smell disorders that contribute to swallowing can worsen or develop because of pharmacotherapy or radiation therapy; metabolic or central nervous system damage due to cachexia, sarcopenia, or inflammation can also cause dysphagia. As the causes of eating disorders in cancer patients are complex and involve multiple factors, cancer patients require a multifaceted and long-term approach by the medical care team. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Neural Mechanisms of Swallowing)
20 pages, 2594 KiB  
Article
Monitoring DNA Damage and Repair in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Lung Cancer Radiotherapy Patients
by Pavel N. Lobachevsky, Nicholas W. Bucknell, Joel Mason, Diane Russo, Xiaoyu Yin, Lisa Selbie, David L. Ball, Tomas Kron, Michael Hofman, Shankar Siva and Olga A. Martin
Cancers 2020, 12(9), 2517; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12092517 - 4 Sep 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4096
Abstract
Thoracic radiotherapy (RT) is required for the curative management of inoperable lung cancer, however, treatment delivery is limited by normal tissue toxicity. Prior studies suggest that using radiation-induced DNA damage response (DDR) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) has potential to predict RT-associated [...] Read more.
Thoracic radiotherapy (RT) is required for the curative management of inoperable lung cancer, however, treatment delivery is limited by normal tissue toxicity. Prior studies suggest that using radiation-induced DNA damage response (DDR) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) has potential to predict RT-associated toxicities. We collected PBMC from 38 patients enrolled on a prospective clinical trial who received definitive fractionated RT for non-small cell lung cancer. DDR was measured by automated counting of nuclear γ-H2AX foci in immunofluorescence images. Analysis of samples collected before, during and after RT demonstrated the induction of DNA damage in PBMC collected shortly after RT commenced, however, this damage repaired later. Radiation dose to the tumour and lung contributed to the in vivo induction of γ-H2AX foci. Aliquots of PBMC collected before treatment were also irradiated ex vivo, and γ-H2AX kinetics were analyzed. A trend for increasing of fraction of irreparable DNA damage in patients with higher toxicity grades was revealed. Slow DNA repair in three patients was associated with a combined dysphagia/cough toxicity and was confirmed by elevated in vivo RT-generated irreparable DNA damage. These results warrant inclusion of an assessment of DDR in PBMC in a panel of predictive biomarkers that would identify patients at a higher risk of toxicity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop