Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (38)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = pulmonary metastasectomy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 385 KiB  
Review
Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Colorectal Cancer: Evidence and Outcomes—A Narrative Review
by Athanasios Papatriantafyllou, Konstantinos Grapatsas, Francesk Mulita, Nikolaos G. Baikoussis, Elias Liolis, Levan Tchabashvili, Konstantinos Tasios, Spyros Papadoulas, Manfred Dahm and Vasileios Leivaditis
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4172; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124172 - 12 Jun 2025
Viewed by 731
Abstract
Pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer represents a key component in modern oncological surgery, balancing precision resection with systemic disease management. Despite ongoing debate initiated by randomized trials, the surgical removal of lung metastases continues to offer significant survival benefits in well-selected patients. This [...] Read more.
Pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer represents a key component in modern oncological surgery, balancing precision resection with systemic disease management. Despite ongoing debate initiated by randomized trials, the surgical removal of lung metastases continues to offer significant survival benefits in well-selected patients. This review synthesizes the evolving landscape of pulmonary metastasectomy, integrating classical prognostic indicators, such as the disease-free interval (DFI) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, with emerging molecular insights including KRAS and BRAF mutations. The relationship between surgical radicality, systemic therapies, and personalized genetic profiling is redefining patient selection and optimizing outcomes. By dissecting recent evidence and ongoing controversies, we clarify the complex decision-making required to navigate this complex clinical terrain. Ultimately, the synergy of multidisciplinary care and precision surgery holds the promise of durable disease control and extended survival in colorectal cancer patients with lung metastases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Trends in Visceral and Gastrointestinal Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 234 KiB  
Perspective
From Awake to Minimalist Spontaneous Ventilation Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: An Ongoing Journey
by Eugenio Pompeo
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(7), 2475; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072475 - 4 Apr 2025
Viewed by 650
Abstract
Spontaneous ventilation lung surgery (SVLS) without intubation is aimed at avoiding adverse effects of mechanical ventilation lung surgery (MVLS) entailing one-lung mechanical ventilation through a double-lumen tracheal tube. This innovative strategy has evolved following the publication of a small randomized study of thoracoscopic [...] Read more.
Spontaneous ventilation lung surgery (SVLS) without intubation is aimed at avoiding adverse effects of mechanical ventilation lung surgery (MVLS) entailing one-lung mechanical ventilation through a double-lumen tracheal tube. This innovative strategy has evolved following the publication of a small randomized study of thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection carried out under spontaneous ventilation without tracheal intubation in fully awake patients. It now entails target-controlled sedation, the use of a laryngeal mask, and thoracic analgesia by intercostal or paravertebral blocks and has shown promise both in unicenter and multicenter studies, resulting in optimal feasibility and safety and highly satisfactory results, particularly in patients undergoing lung cancer resection and metastasectomy, lung biopsy for undetermined interstitial lung disease, lung volume reduction surgery for end-stage emphysema, and bullectomy for primary and secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. However, concerns and unresolved issues still exist regarding the advantages and disadvantages of SVLS as well as the identification of optimal indications. This perspective is aimed at providing a critical overview of the current knowledge about SVLS with emphasis on recent data comparing the results with those of MVLS published in the last 10 years. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thoracic Surgery: Current Practice and Future Directions)
11 pages, 1012 KiB  
Article
Low Rates of Intrapulmonary Local Recurrence After Laser Metastasectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study of Colorectal Cancer Metastases
by Ahmad Shalabi, Sundus F. Shalabi, Thomas Graeter, Stefan Welter, Ahmed Ehab and Jonas Kuon
Cancers 2025, 17(4), 683; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17040683 - 18 Feb 2025
Viewed by 611
Abstract
Objective: Colorectal pulmonary metastasis is the most common resected metastatic disease of the lung. Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for colorectal oligometastases is a well-established intervention with curative intent. Local recurrence at the resection site in the lung is a problem, with an impact on [...] Read more.
Objective: Colorectal pulmonary metastasis is the most common resected metastatic disease of the lung. Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for colorectal oligometastases is a well-established intervention with curative intent. Local recurrence at the resection site in the lung is a problem, with an impact on survival. The use of a 1320 nm neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser causes the vaporization and coagulation at the resection line and thereby increases safety margins around the nodule. We aimed to evaluate the local recurrence rate after laser-assisted pulmonary metastasectomy (LPM) for colorectal metastases. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 49 patients treated with laser-assisted pulmonary metastasectomy for 139 metastatic nodules from colorectal cancer from 2010 to 2018. All nodules were resected using Nd:YAG 1320 nm laser, aiming for a safety margin of five mm. The minimum follow-up time after PM was 24 months. Results: Local intrapulmonary recurrence developed at 7 of the 139 (5.0%) resection sites in 5 of the 49 patients (10.2%). Microscopically incomplete resection was a significant risk factor for recurrence (p = 0.023). Larger nodule size (>12 mm) negatively impacted local recurrence (p = 0.024). Nodules larger or equal to 12 mm in size also lowered the patients’ probability of survival by 67.29% (HR: 0.3271, 95% CI: 0.1265–0.846, p = 0.018). Conclusions: The rate of local recurrence at the resection site after LPM for colorectal metastases is low. Complete resection is a positive predictor of survival without local recurrence. Microscopic complete resection with the addition of vaporization and coagulation at the resection margin seems to be sufficient to prevent local recurrence. However, larger nodules may require larger safety margins. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surgery in Metastatic Cancer (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1218 KiB  
Article
The Role of Metastasectomies and Immunotherapy in the Management of Melanoma Lung Metastases: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database
by Panagiotis Tasoudis, Vasiliki Manaki, Shannon Parness, Audrey L. Khoury, Chris B. Agala, Benjamin E. Haithcock, Gita N. Mody and Jason M. Long
Cancers 2025, 17(2), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17020206 - 10 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1159
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with metastatic melanoma to the lung typically have poor outcomes. Although a pulmonary metastasectomy for selected patients has been shown to improve survival, the role of surgical resection following the introduction of immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma is unknown. The objective of [...] Read more.
Introduction: Patients with metastatic melanoma to the lung typically have poor outcomes. Although a pulmonary metastasectomy for selected patients has been shown to improve survival, the role of surgical resection following the introduction of immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine predictors of survival for patients with melanoma metastatic to the lung in the era of immunotherapy. Methods: In this retrospective study, data from the National Cancer Database were abstracted for patients with melanoma lung metastases. The overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard analysis, adjusting for previously described risk factors for mortality. Patients with concomitant metastases to organs other than the lung were excluded from the study. Results: A total of 625 patients with lung metastases at the time of a skin melanoma diagnosis were identified. A total of 280 patients underwent a pulmonary metastasectomy, 267 received immunotherapy, and 78 were treated with both a metastasectomy and immunotherapy. During a median follow-up time of 34.6 months [IQR: 14.2, 75.9], a metastasectomy was found to offer significantly improved survival compared to immunotherapy alone. No difference was noted between a metastasectomy and a combination of a metastasectomy and immunotherapy in the adjusted Cox proportional hazard model. Conclusions: When statistical models were adjusted for risk factors, a metastasectomy maintained a significant survival advantage compared to immunotherapy. The addition of immunotherapy to the treatment of patients treated with a pulmonary metastasectomy did not improve survival. Our findings support the role of surgery for patients with pulmonary metastatic melanoma. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Contemporary Surgical Management of Melanoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

3 pages, 178 KiB  
Reply
Reply to Treasure et al. Comment on “Ambrogi et al. Lung Metastasectomy: Where Do We Stand? Results from an Italian Multicentric Prospective Database. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3106”
by Marcello Carlo Ambrogi, Vittorio Aprile, Stefano Sanna, Sergio Nicola Forti Parri, Giovanna Rizzardi, Olivia Fanucchi, Leonardo Valentini, Alberto Italiani, Riccardo Morganti, Carlotta Francesca Cartia, James M. Hughes, Marco Lucchi and Andrea Droghetti
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(23), 7183; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237183 - 27 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 554
Abstract
We would like to express our sincere gratitude for the thoughtful reflections on our recent study regarding pulmonary metastasectomy, and we greatly appreciate the constructive dialog that our work has sparked [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
14 pages, 16334 KiB  
Case Report
Bladder Adenocarcinoma in a Constellation of Multiple Site Malignancies: An Unusual Case and Systematic Review
by Daniel Porav-Hodade, Raul Gherasim, Andrada Loghin, Bianca Lazar, Ovidiu Simion Cotoi, Mihail-Alexandru Badea, Mártha Orsolya Katalin Ilona, Ciprian Todea-Moga, Mihai Dorin Vartolomei, Georgescu Rares, Nicolae Crisan and Ovidiu Bogdan Feciche
Diagnostics 2024, 14(22), 2510; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14222510 - 9 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1689
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Multiple primary malignant tumors represent a small percentage of the total number of oncological cases and can involve either metachronous or synchronous development and represent challenges in diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning. Our purpose is to present a rare case [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Multiple primary malignant tumors represent a small percentage of the total number of oncological cases and can involve either metachronous or synchronous development and represent challenges in diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning. Our purpose is to present a rare case of bladder adenocarcinoma in a female patient with multiple primary malignant tumors and to provide systematic review of the available literature. Materials and Methods: A 67-year-old female patient was admitted with altered general condition and anuria. The past medical history of the patient included malignant melanoma (2014), cervical cancer (2017), colon cancer (2021), obstructive anuria (2023), and liver metastasectomy (2023). Transurethral resection of bladder tumor was performed for bladder tumors. Results: Contrast CT highlighted multiple pulmonary metastases, a poly nodular liver conglomerate, retroperitoneal lymph node, II/III grade left ureterohydronephrosis, and no digestive tract tumor masses. The pathological result of the bladder resection showed an infiltrative adenocarcinoma. Conclusions: The difference between primary bladder adenocarcinoma tumor and metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma is the key for the future therapeutic strategy. Identification and assessment of risk factors such as viral infection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, smoking, and genetics are pivotal in understanding and managing multiple primary malignant tumors. Personalized prevention strategies and screening programs may facilitate the early detection of these tumors, whether synchronous or metachronous. The use of multicancer early detection (MCED) blood tests for early diagnosis appears promising. However, additional research is needed to standardize these techniques for cancer detection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Urologic Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2546 KiB  
Article
Survival after Lung Metastasectomy from Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Database Study
by Yoshikane Yamauchi, Masaaki Sato, Takekazu Iwata, Makoto Endo, Norihiko Ikeda, Hiroshi Hashimoto, Tai Hato, Hidemi Suzuki, Haruhisa Matsuguma, Yasushi Shintani, Haruhiko Kondo, Takahiko Oyama, Yoko Azuma, Tomohiko Iida, Noriaki Sakakura, Mingyon Mun, Keisuke Asakura, Takashi Ohtsuka, Hirofumi Uehara and Yukinori Sakao
Cancers 2024, 16(19), 3333; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16193333 - 29 Sep 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1448
Abstract
Background/objectives: The efficacy of lung metastasectomy in patients with urothelial carcinoma remains inconclusive, as there is only limited evidence from small studies. In this study, we aimed to assess the prognostic outcomes of excising pulmonary metastases from urothelial carcinoma. Methods: In this study, [...] Read more.
Background/objectives: The efficacy of lung metastasectomy in patients with urothelial carcinoma remains inconclusive, as there is only limited evidence from small studies. In this study, we aimed to assess the prognostic outcomes of excising pulmonary metastases from urothelial carcinoma. Methods: In this study, we utilized data from the Metastatic Lung Tumor Study Group of Japan database, a multi-institutional prospective database of pulmonary metastasectomies. We examined the data of patients who had undergone pulmonary metastasectomy for urothelial carcinoma between 1985 and 2021. Exclusion criteria included insufficient clinical information and follow-up of <3 months. Results: The study cohort comprised 100 patients (63 bladder cancer, 37 renal pelvic and ureteral cancer), with a median follow-up of 34 months. There were 70 male and 30 female patients of average age 66.5 ± 10.4 years at lung metastasectomy. The median interval from treatment of the primary lesion to metastasectomy was 19 months and the maximum tumor diameter was 21 ± 15 mm. Three- and five-year overall survival rates were 69% and 59%, respectively. Three- and five-year disease-free survival rates were 56% and 46%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified larger tumor diameter (hazard ratio: 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.21–2.17) and distant metastases at the time of treatment of the primary cancer (hazard ratio: 4.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.54–11.6) as significant adverse prognostic factors for overall survival. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest published case series of pulmonary resection for metastatic urothelial carcinoma, providing benchmark data for the assessment of long-term outcomes of this rare entity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 568 KiB  
Systematic Review
Uniportal Laser-Assisted Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy (U-LA-VATS) for Lung Metastasectomy: Technical Description, Peri-Operative Results and Pertinent Literature Review
by Carolina Sassorossi, Marco Chiappetta, Dania Nachira, Annalisa Campanella, Gloria Santoro, Giuseppe Calabrese, Chiara Scognamiglio, Antonio Giulio Napolitano, Alessia Senatore, Leonardo Petracca Ciavarella, Maria Letizia Vita, Stefano Margaritora and Filippo Lococo
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(18), 5346; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185346 - 10 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1363
Abstract
Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is a well-established treatment that is able to contribute to the cure of oligometastatic cancer. Surgery should adopt the most lung-sparing approach possible to preserve pulmonary function (and, consequently, the quality of life) and to spare the lung for potential [...] Read more.
Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is a well-established treatment that is able to contribute to the cure of oligometastatic cancer. Surgery should adopt the most lung-sparing approach possible to preserve pulmonary function (and, consequently, the quality of life) and to spare the lung for potential additional lung resections. In this framework, laser technology has been introduced in recent decades, but only few experiences combining laser technology with VATS approaches have been reported till now. The main focus of this manuscript is to report our institutional experience in performing lung-sparing laser-assisted PM by uniportal VATS (uniportal laser-assisted VATS: U-LA-VATS). The surgical technique and peri-operative results from our series of patients were herein presented and compared with the pertinent literature. Methods: Between March 2021 and November 2023, among 98 patients who underwent PM, a total of 24 patients (18 men (75%); 6 women (25%); mean age 61.4 years; age range 13–83 years) were treated with laser-assisted PM at our institution. Patients who underwent anatomical resection were excluded for the purpose of the analysis. The U-LA-VATS procedure adopted a modified laser-assisted lung resection technique for performing PM via VATS. Dedicated instruments are used, characterized by a long shape and a curved shape, with distal and proximal articulations. A surgical laser system (Thulium + Diodo OUTPUT 30–10 W, Quanta System S.p.a., Solbiate Olona, Italy) was used, and a 550-μm sterile optical fibre conducted through a specific thoracoscopic handpiece was introduced in the lowest part of the incision. Peri-operative results were analysed in all cohort and compared according to the surgical technique. Moreover, these results were compared with those reported in the literature. Comprehensive research of the literature was conducted on PubMed from 2000 to 2024. A review was performed and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Results: In 12 cases (50%), thulium laser-assisted resection was performed using uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), and in the other cases (12, 50%), a (mini)thoracotomy access was adopted. In the thoracotomy group, the mean duration of surgery was 95 ± 57.7 min; meanwhile, it was 73.5 ± 35.5 in the uniportal VATS group. At the univariate analysis, this difference resulted to be statistically significant (p value 0.025). We did not observe intra-operative complications or remarkable malfunction of the laser system. We also did not report major complications after surgery; also the air-leak rate was 8.3% and 0% after thoracotomic and VATS procedures, respectively. Surgical margins were free from disease in all cases. Major and minor post-op complication rates were similar in both groups. The mean hospitalization after surgery was 2.9 ± 0.3 days for the uniportal VATS group and 3.7 ± 0.9 days for the thoracotomy group, this difference being statistically significant at the univariate analysis (p value = 0.015). Conclusions: U-LA-VATS is a safe and effective procedure, able to combine a parenchymal sparing exeresis with a mini-invasive approach. This procedure is associated with a shorter hospital stay compared with PM performed by a thoracotomic approach. Compared with the selected works for the review, our series is the only one describing the use of laser resection combined with a uniportal VATS approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Future Opportunities in Thoracic Surgery: The Cutting Edge)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1184 KiB  
Article
Outcome and Survival Analysis of Multicenter Lung Metastasectomy for Primary Liver Tumor with Pulmonary Metastasis
by Yu-Cheng Chang, Xu-Heng Chiang, Yu-Ting Tseng, Shuenn-Wen Kuo, Pei-Ming Huang, Mong-Wei Lin, Hsao-Hsun Hsu and Jin-Shing Chen
Cancers 2024, 16(17), 3007; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16173007 - 29 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1295
Abstract
Oligopulmonary metastases from primary liver tumors are typically treated surgically. We evaluated the clinical outcomes after lung metastasectomy in patients with pulmonary metastases from primary liver tumors. We retrospectively enrolled 147 consecutive patients with lung metastases from liver cancer who had undergone pulmonary [...] Read more.
Oligopulmonary metastases from primary liver tumors are typically treated surgically. We evaluated the clinical outcomes after lung metastasectomy in patients with pulmonary metastases from primary liver tumors. We retrospectively enrolled 147 consecutive patients with lung metastases from liver cancer who had undergone pulmonary metastasectomies at three medical centers between February 2007 and December 2020. All patients were pathologically confirmed to have lung metastases from liver cancer. Among the 147 patients, 110, 17, and 20 initially underwent surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation, and transcatheter arterial embolization, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) in the study cohort was 22%. Univariate analysis revealed four factors associated with better OS: surgical resection as the initial primary liver tumor treatment (p = 0.004), a disease-free interval exceeding 12 months after the initial liver surgery (p = 0.036), a lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-Na score (≤20) for liver cirrhosis (p = 0.044), and the absence of local liver tumor recurrence at the time of pulmonary metastasectomy (p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that surgical resection as the initial primary liver tumor treatment and lower MELD-Na scores significantly correlated with better OS. Our findings can assist thoracic surgeons in selecting suitable patients for surgery and predicting surgical outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue “Cancer Metastasis” in 2023–2024)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1592 KiB  
Article
Prognostic Factors of Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Oligometastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Spread to the Lungs
by Bohyun Kim, Mi Hyoung Moon and Seok Whan Moon
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4241; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144241 - 20 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1137
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Pulmonary metastasis is the most prevalent type of extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) metastasis. International guidelines recommend systemic treatment for patients with HCC having pulmonary metastases. However, the role of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) remains relatively unexplored. Therefore, we assessed the survival outcomes [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Pulmonary metastasis is the most prevalent type of extrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) metastasis. International guidelines recommend systemic treatment for patients with HCC having pulmonary metastases. However, the role of pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) remains relatively unexplored. Therefore, we assessed the survival outcomes and the factors influencing them in patients who underwent PM for metastatic HCC. Methods: Clinical data were collected from patients with HCC who underwent PM for metastasis at a single tertiary center between January 2004 and December 2022. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with survival outcomes. Results: Overall, 63 patients underwent PM with a median follow-up time of 84.0 months. The cumulative survival rates after the initial PM at 1, 2, and 5 years were 79.1%, 63.9%, and 35.6%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, early intrathoracic recurrence <6 months, number and size of metastases, resection margin status, and PM bilaterality were significantly associated with overall survival. A larger size of the primary HCC, increased number of repeated PM, and frequent lobectomy were more common in patients with early (<6 months) recurrence after PM than in those without early recurrence. Conclusions: PM in patients with metastatic HCC may provide acceptable survival outcomes for those with smaller, unilateral lung metastases that can be resected with generous surgical margins. However, early recurrence with reduced overall survival is likely in patients with a larger-size initial HCC after prior PM and lobectomy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 584 KiB  
Commentary
The Case for Pulmonary Metastasectomy—Clinical Practice Narrative Review and Commentary
by Paolo Scanagatta, Gianluca Ancona, Sara Cagnetti, Casimiro Eugenio Giorgetta, Francesco Inzirillo, Eugenio Ravalli, Martina Maiolani and Giuseppe Naldi
Life 2024, 14(6), 702; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14060702 - 29 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1333
Abstract
Pulmonary metastasectomy has become a well-established procedure for patients with certain types of solid tumors. Patients are usually scheduled for staged lung metastasectomy in case of primary tumor control, the absence of distant non-lung metastases, and when complete resection is achievable. Nodules are [...] Read more.
Pulmonary metastasectomy has become a well-established procedure for patients with certain types of solid tumors. Patients are usually scheduled for staged lung metastasectomy in case of primary tumor control, the absence of distant non-lung metastases, and when complete resection is achievable. Nodules are removed with precision resection in order to ensure radical resection with minimal margins; this technique permits good oncological results, preserving the surrounding pulmonary parenchyma and causing minimal distortion compared to staplers. When possible, anatomical resections should be avoided since they are not justified by real oncological advantages and, in the majority of cases, sacrifice too much healthy tissue, possibly leading to inoperability in the case of metachronous relapses. Thus, preserving the maximum amount of pulmonary parenchyma is crucial because repeated metastasectomies are possible and frequent, with no theoretical limits to the number of reinterventions. In our multidisciplinary board team, we support the role of pulmonary metastasectomy as a useful curative therapy, with acceptable morbidity and mortality, with indications to be discussed case-by-case. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Modern Thoracic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 899 KiB  
Article
Lung Metastasectomy: Where Do We Stand? Results from an Italian Multicentric Prospective Database
by Marcello Carlo Ambrogi, Vittorio Aprile, Stefano Sanna, Sergio Nicola Forti Parri, Giovanna Rizzardi, Olivia Fanucchi, Leonardo Valentini, Alberto Italiani, Riccardo Morganti, Carlotta Francesca Cartia, James M. Hughes, Marco Lucchi and Andrea Droghetti
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3106; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113106 - 25 May 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1449
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The surgical resection of pulmonary metastases is considered a therapeutic option in selected cases. In light of this, we present the results from a national multicenter prospective registry of lung metastasectomy. Methods: This retrospective analysis involves data collected prospectively and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The surgical resection of pulmonary metastases is considered a therapeutic option in selected cases. In light of this, we present the results from a national multicenter prospective registry of lung metastasectomy. Methods: This retrospective analysis involves data collected prospectively and consecutively in a national multicentric Italian database, including patients who underwent lung metastasectomy. The primary endpoints were the analysis of morbidity and overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints focusing on the analysis of potential risk factors affecting both morbidity and OS. Results: A total 470 lung procedures were performed (4 pneumonectomies, 46 lobectomies/bilobectomies, 13 segmentectomies and 407 wedge resections) on 461 patients (258 men and 203 women, mean age of 63.1 years). The majority of patients had metastases from colorectal cancer (45.8%). In most cases (63.6%), patients had only one lung metastasis. A minimally invasive approach was chosen in 143 cases (30.4%). The mean operative time was 118 min, with no reported deaths. Morbidity most frequently consisted of prolonged air leaking and bleeding, but no re-intervention was required. Statistical analysis revealed that morbidity was significantly affected by operative time and pulmonary comorbidities, while OS was significantly affected by disease-free interval (DFI) > 24 months (p = 0.005), epithelial histology (p = 0.001) and colorectal histology (p = 0.004) during univariate analysis. No significant correlation was found between OS and age, gender, surgical approach, surgical extent, surgical device, the number of resected metastases, lesion diameter, the site of lesions and nodal involvement. Multivariate analysis of OS confirmed that only epithelial histology and DFI were risk-factors, with p-values of 0.041 and 0.031, respectively. Conclusions: Lung metastasectomy appears to be a safe procedure, with acceptable morbidity, even with a minimally invasive approach. However, it remains a local treatment of a systemic disease. Therefore, careful attention should be paid to selecting patients who could truly benefit from surgical intervention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1237 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Follow-Up after Laser-Assisted Pulmonary Metastasectomy Shows Complete Lung Function Recovery
by Daniel Baum, Axel Rolle, Dirk Koschel, Lysann Rostock, Rahel Decker, Monika Sombati, Florian Öhme and Till Plönes
Cancers 2024, 16(9), 1762; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16091762 - 1 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1813
Abstract
Preserving maximum lung function is a fundamental goal of parenchymal-sparing pulmonary laser surgery. Long-term studies for follow-up of lung function after pulmonary laser metastasectomy are lacking. However, a sufficient postoperative lung function is essential for quality of life and reduces potential postoperative complications. [...] Read more.
Preserving maximum lung function is a fundamental goal of parenchymal-sparing pulmonary laser surgery. Long-term studies for follow-up of lung function after pulmonary laser metastasectomy are lacking. However, a sufficient postoperative lung function is essential for quality of life and reduces potential postoperative complications. In this study, we investigate the extent of loss in lung function following pulmonary laser resection after three, six, and twelve months. We conducted a retrospective analysis using a prospective database of 4595 patients, focusing on 126 patients who underwent unilateral pulmonary laser resection for lung metastases from 1996 to 2022 using a 1318 nm Nd:YAG laser or a high-power pure diode laser. Results show that from these patients, a median of three pulmonary nodules were removed, with 75% presenting central lung lesions and 25% peripheral lesions. The median preoperative FEV1 was 98% of the predicted value, decreasing to 71% postoperatively but improving to 90% after three months, 93% after six months, and 96% after twelve months. Statistical analysis using the Friedman test indicated no significant difference in FEV1 between preoperative levels and those at six and twelve months post-surgery. The findings confirm that pulmonary laser surgery effectively preserves lung function over time, with patients generally regaining their preoperative lung function within a year, regardless of the metastases’ location. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 761 KiB  
Review
Colorectal Cancer Pulmonary Metastasectomy: When, Why and How
by Francesco Petrella, Federica Danuzzo, Maria Chiara Sibilia, Sara Vaquer, Raffaella Longarini, Alessandro Guidi, Federico Raveglia, Lidia Libretti, Emanuele Pirondini, Andrea Cara, Enrico Mario Cassina, Antonio Tuoro and Diego Cortinovis
Cancers 2024, 16(7), 1408; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16071408 - 3 Apr 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3706
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third-most-diagnosed cancer in males and in females, representing 8% of estimated new cases, and the third cause of cancer-related death in both sexes, accounting for 9% of cancer deaths in men and 8% in women. About 20% of patients [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer is the third-most-diagnosed cancer in males and in females, representing 8% of estimated new cases, and the third cause of cancer-related death in both sexes, accounting for 9% of cancer deaths in men and 8% in women. About 20% of patients diagnosed with CRC present metastatic disease. Although lung metachronous or synchronous metastatic spread without other involved sites has been reported in only a small proportion of patients, considering that this tumor is frequently diagnosed, the clinical approach to CRC pulmonary metastases represents a major issue for thoracic surgeons and CRC oncologists. Among patients diagnosed with pulmonary metastases from CRC, about 9–12% are eligible for local treatments with radical intent, including surgical resection, SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy) and ablation therapy. Due to the lack of randomized controlled trials among different local strategies, there is no definitive evidence about the optimal approach, although surgical resection is considered the most effective therapeutic option in this clinical scenario. Oncological achievement of primary radical resection, the biology of primary tumor and metastatic sites, disease free interval and or progression free survival are independent prognostic factors which make it possible to define a cohort of patients which might significantly benefit from pulmonary metastasectomy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3631 KiB  
Article
Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Adrenocortical Carcinoma—Not If, but When
by Shamus R. Carr, Frank Villa Hernandez, Diana Grace Varghese, Hyoyoung Choo-Wosoba, Seth M. Steinberg, Martha E. Teke, Jaydira Del Rivero, David S. Schrump and Chuong D. Hoang
Cancers 2024, 16(4), 702; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040702 - 7 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1937
Abstract
Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) commonly metastasizes to the lungs, and pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is utilized due to limited systemic options. Methods: All ACC patients with initially only lung metastases (LM) from a single institution constituted this observational case series. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional [...] Read more.
Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) commonly metastasizes to the lungs, and pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is utilized due to limited systemic options. Methods: All ACC patients with initially only lung metastases (LM) from a single institution constituted this observational case series. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses evaluated the association with potential prognostic factors and outcomes. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of the PM or, in those patients who did not undergo surgery, from the development of LM. Results: A total of 75 ACC patients over a 45-year period met the criteria; 52 underwent PM, and 23 did not. The patients undergoing PM had a median OS of 3.1 years (95% CI: 2.4, 4.7 years) with the 5- and 10-year OS being 35.5% and 32.8%, respectively. The total resected LM did not impact the OS nor the DFS. The patients who developed LM after 11 months from the initial ACC resection had an improved OS (4.2 years; 95% CI: 3.2, NR; p = 0.0096) compared to those developing metastases earlier (2.4 years; 95% CI: 1.6, 2.8). Patients who underwent PM within 11 months of adrenalectomy demonstrated a reduced OS (2.2 years; 95% CI: 1.0, 2.7) compared to those after 11 months (3.6 years, 95% CI: 2.6, NR; p = 0.0045). PM may provide benefit to those patients with LM at presentation (HR: 0.5; p = 0.2827), with the time to first PM as a time-varying covariate. Conclusions: PM appears to have a role in ACC patients. The number of nodules should not be an exclusion factor. Patients developing LM within a year of primary tumor resection may benefit from waiting before further surgeries, which may provide additional insight into who may benefit from PM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Lung Cancer Surgical Treatment and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop