Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = pryout failure

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 4593 KB  
Article
Finite Element and Parametric Study on the Shear Capacity of FRP and Stainless-Steel Bolted Connectors in GFRP–Concrete Composite Beams
by Abdalla Zidan, Hesham Fawzy Shaaban and Ayman El-Zohairy
J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9(11), 622; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9110622 - 10 Nov 2025
Viewed by 1177
Abstract
Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites, particularly glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP), are increasingly utilized in civil engineering due to their high strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and environmental sustainability compared to steel. Shear connectors in FRP–concrete hybrid beams are critical for effective load transfer, yet their [...] Read more.
Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites, particularly glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP), are increasingly utilized in civil engineering due to their high strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and environmental sustainability compared to steel. Shear connectors in FRP–concrete hybrid beams are critical for effective load transfer, yet their behavior under static loads remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate the shear strength, stiffness, and failure modes of GFRP, CFRP, AFRP, and stainless-steel shear connectors in FRP–concrete hybrid beams through a comprehensive parametric analysis, addressing gaps in material optimization, bolt configuration, and design guidelines. A validated finite element model in Abaqus was employed to simulate push-out tests based on experimental data. The parameters analyzed included shear connector material (GFRP, CFRP, AFRP, and stainless steel), bolt diameter (16–30 mm), number of bolts (1–6), longitudinal spacing (60–120 mm), embedment length (40–70 mm), and concrete compressive strength (30–70 MPa). Shear load–slip (P-S) curves, ultimate shear load (P), secant stiffness (K1), and failure modes were evaluated. CFRP bolts exhibited the highest shear capacity, 26.50% greater than stainless steel, with failure dominated by flange bearing, like AFRP and stainless steel, while GFRP bolts failed by shear failure of bolt shanks. Shear capacity increased by 90.60%, with bolt diameter from 16 mm to 30 mm, shifting failure from bolt shank to concrete splitting. Multi-bolt configurations reduced per-bolt shear capacity by up to 15.00% due to uneven load distribution. Larger bolt spacing improved per-bolt shear capacity by 9.48% from 60 mm (3d) to 120 mm (6d). However, in beams, larger spacing reduced the total number of bolts, decreasing overall shear resistance and the degree of shear connection. Higher embedment lengths (he/d ≥ 3.0) mitigated pry-out failure, with shear capacity increasing by 33.59% from 40 mm to 70 mm embedment. Increasing concrete strength from 30 MPa to 70 MPa enhanced shear capacity by 22.07%, shifting the failure mode from concrete splitting to bolt shank shear. The study highlights the critical influence of bolt material, diameter, number, spacing, embedment length, and concrete strength on shear behavior. These findings support the development of FRP-specific design models, enhancing the reliability and sustainability of FRP–concrete hybrid systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer Composites and Fibers, 3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 9139 KB  
Article
Experimental and Numerical Simulation Study on the Mechanical Properties of Integrated Sleeve Mortise and Tenon Steel–Wood Composite Joints
by Zhanguang Wang, Weihan Yang, Zhenyu Gao, Jianhua Shao and Dongmei Li
Buildings 2025, 15(1), 137; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15010137 - 4 Jan 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1821
Abstract
In view of the application status and technical challenges of steel–wood composite joints in architecture, this paper proposes an innovative connection technology to solve issues such as susceptibility to pry-out at beam–column joints and low load-bearing capacity and to provide various reinforcement methods [...] Read more.
In view of the application status and technical challenges of steel–wood composite joints in architecture, this paper proposes an innovative connection technology to solve issues such as susceptibility to pry-out at beam–column joints and low load-bearing capacity and to provide various reinforcement methods in order to meet the different structural requirements and economic benefits. By designing and manufacturing four groups of beam–column joint specimens with different reinforcement methods, including no reinforcement, structural adhesive and angle steel reinforcement, 4 mm thick steel sleeve reinforcement, and 6 mm thick steel sleeve reinforcement, monotonic loading tests and finite element simulations were carried out, respectively. This research found that unreinforced specimens and structural adhesive angle steel-reinforced joints exhibited obvious mortise and tenon compression deformation and, moreover, tenon pulling phenomena at load values of approximately 2 kN and 2.6 kN, respectively. However, the joint reinforced by a steel sleeve showed a significant improvement in the tenon pulling phenomenon and demonstrated excellent initial stiffness characteristics. The failure mode of the steel sleeve-reinforced joints is primarily characterized by the propagation of cracks at the edges of the steel plate and the tearing of the wood, but the overall structure remains intact. The initial rotational stiffness of the joints reinforced with angle steel and self-tapping screws, the joints reinforced with 4 mm thick steel sleeves, and the joints reinforced with 6 mm thick steel sleeves are 3.96, 6.99, and 13.62 times that of the pure wooden joints, while the ultimate bending moments are 1.97, 7.11, and 7.39 times, respectively. Using finite element software to simulate four groups of joints to observe their stress changes, the areas with high stress in the joints without sleeve reinforcement are mainly located at the upper and lower ends of the tenon, where the compressive stress at the upper edge of the tenon and the tensile stress at the lower flange are both distributed along the grain direction of the beam. The stress on the column sleeve of the joints reinforced with steel sleeves and bolts is relatively low, while the areas with high strain in the beam sleeve are mainly concentrated on the side with the welded stiffeners and its surroundings; the strain around the bolt holes is also quite noticeable. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Building Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 8809 KB  
Article
Seismic Performance of Drop-In Anchors in Concrete under Shear and Tension
by Khaled Sennah, Hossein Azimi, Mizan Ahmed and Ahmed Hamoda
Buildings 2024, 14(7), 2021; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072021 - 2 Jul 2024
Viewed by 2925
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental study conducted on the behavior of drop-in anchors in uncracked concrete slabs. Both seismic (cyclic) load tests and static load tests to collapse are performed on drop-in anchors subjected to tension or shear forces. Three different anchor sizes [...] Read more.
This paper presents an experimental study conducted on the behavior of drop-in anchors in uncracked concrete slabs. Both seismic (cyclic) load tests and static load tests to collapse are performed on drop-in anchors subjected to tension or shear forces. Three different anchor sizes are subjected to seismic qualification testing, followed by a static load test to collapse. The test results confirm the capability of the tested anchors to sustain simulated pulsating seismic tension and shear loading with frequency ranges between 0.1 and 2.0 Hz. It was observed that no tension failure occurred at the end of the cyclic load tests for all the tested anchors, and their residual inelastic maximum displacement at the end of the cyclic tension test was relatively small. Moreover, the experimental results show that the anchors’ ultimate capacities are higher than those specified by the anchor manufacturer. Finally, the anchors’ experimental pullout shear capacities are compared with the failure prediction equations in the literature and design codes. It is found that the theoretical models provide a conservative prediction of the concrete breakout of anchors in tension compared to the experimental ultimate loads. The coefficient for pry-out strength (kcp) equal to 2 or slightly smaller than 2 is likely to predict a better pry-out capacity with the experimental results compared to the application of the high conservative value of kcp equal to 1, as given in the code. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development of Concrete and Composite Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 3742 KB  
Article
Design Recommendations for Concrete Pryout Capacity of Headed Steel Studs and Post-Installed Anchors
by Khalil Jebara, Akanshu Sharma and Joško Ožbolt
CivilEng 2023, 4(3), 782-807; https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng4030044 - 10 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 5643
Abstract
Current formulas to assess the shear capacity of headed steel stud anchors and post-installed (PI) anchors in case of pryout failure (sometimes known as pull-rear failure) have been derived either based on the indirect-tension resistance model or are fully empirical based on push-out [...] Read more.
Current formulas to assess the shear capacity of headed steel stud anchors and post-installed (PI) anchors in case of pryout failure (sometimes known as pull-rear failure) have been derived either based on the indirect-tension resistance model or are fully empirical based on push-out test results. In both cases, the predicted pryout capacity is clearly conservative and underestimates the true pryout capacity of anchorages, especially for stiff anchors with low embedment-to-diameter ratios (hef/d < 4.5). This paper proposes an empirical and a semi-empirical formula to predict the concrete pryout capacity of headed steel studs and PI anchors. They were derived based on an improved indirect-tension model which accounts for the stud diameter and the stud spacing in a group of anchors. Furthermore, a database of 214 monotonic shear tests from the literature, including own tests (push-off and horizontally shear tests), is reevaluated and compared to the provisions of EN1992-4. The scope of this assessment proposal includes single and group of headed steel studs and PI anchors attached to a stiff steel plate as well as shear connectors in composite structures without metal deck embedded in normal-weight concrete. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Connections in Concrete Volume 2)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop