Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = proboscis behavioral reflex

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 904 KB  
Article
A Compound Fungicide Impairs Cognitive Performance in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera)
by Xufeng Zhang, Qian Cao, Qihang Sun, Yuting Tian, Yinyin Du and Yuan Guo
Insects 2026, 17(1), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17010051 - 30 Dec 2025
Viewed by 418
Abstract
Fungicides play a critical role in crop protection, yet their potential threats to pollinator remain a concern. This study investigated the sublethal effects of a commercial fungicide, Chunmanchun® (a suspension-emulsion of 7% propiconazole and 28% carbendazim), on cognitive functions of the honey [...] Read more.
Fungicides play a critical role in crop protection, yet their potential threats to pollinator remain a concern. This study investigated the sublethal effects of a commercial fungicide, Chunmanchun® (a suspension-emulsion of 7% propiconazole and 28% carbendazim), on cognitive functions of the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Using the proboscis extension reflex (PER) assay, we evaluated sucrose sensitivity and olfactory learning and memory in workers exposed to the recommended field concentration (PC), along with sublethal (LD10) and semi-lethal (LD50) concentrations. Fungicide exposure significantly reduced sucrose sensitivity across all concentrations tested (0.1%, 1%, and 3%), with the strongest reductions occurring at the LD10 and LD50 levels. While olfactory associative learning was not significantly impaired, memory retention was adversely affected. Bees in the LD50 group showed significantly reduced PER rates at both1 h and 6 h post-training, and LD10 and LD50 groups exhibited significant memory deficits by 1 h and 6 h relative to the control. These results demonstrate that Chunmanchun® impairs both sucrose responsiveness and olfactory memory in honey bees, which may impair foraging efficiency and ultimately affect colony performance. This study highlights a potential ecological risk posed by this fungicide to pollinators in agricultural environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biology and Conservation of Honey Bees)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1275 KB  
Article
The Effects of Silver and Potassium Iodide on Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Learning
by Riley J. Wincheski, Trey Mathews, Harrington Wells, Robert J. Sheaff, Lily A. Anderson, James W. Grice and Charles I. Abramson
Insects 2025, 16(11), 1157; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16111157 - 12 Nov 2025
Viewed by 837
Abstract
Silver iodide (AgI) and potassium iodide (KI), which are used in cloud seeding, were administered to bees in a variety of pretreatments (low or high dosing) and analyzed through a series of experiments to determine the effect on bees’ ability to learn. Cloud [...] Read more.
Silver iodide (AgI) and potassium iodide (KI), which are used in cloud seeding, were administered to bees in a variety of pretreatments (low or high dosing) and analyzed through a series of experiments to determine the effect on bees’ ability to learn. Cloud seeding is the process of dispersing chemicals into an already-formed cloud to attract water molecules that fall to Earth as rain or snow. These chemicals then enter the ecosystem through water and soil. Honey bees were used because they represent a robust and ecologically appropriate model organism to study the behavioral impacts of cloud seeding. The first experiment utilized a shuttle box to test whether honey bees could avoid shock in a punishment experiment. Results revealed that the majority of the pretreatments did inhibit bees’ ability to learn to avoid shock. Experiment 2 consists of two proboscis extension reflex experiments (PER) where bees are trained to associate an odor with a sucrose feeding. Using the PER paradigm, we investigated simple conditioning and odor discrimination. Results revealed that in both the simple conditioning and discrimination experiments, learning was inhibited by the pretreatment of chemicals regardless of dosing amount. The final experiment explored reward discrimination in a free-flying flower patch paradigm. Results revealed that learning ability was not affected; however, return times were greatly impacted. Overall, results showed that AgI and KI throughout each experiment (i.e., shuttle box, PER, and free-flying discrimination) had some degree of negative effect on honey bee behavior. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Social Insects and Apiculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 9547 KB  
Article
Proboscis Extension Response of Three Apis mellifera Subspecies toward Water and Sugars in Subtropical Ecosystem
by Abdulaziz S. Alqarni, Hussain Ali, Javaid Iqbal and Hael S. A. Raweh
Stresses 2023, 3(1), 182-197; https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses3010014 - 12 Jan 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2942
Abstract
The proboscis extension response (PER) assay revealed the responsiveness of three subspecies of the honeybee Apis mellifera [A. m. jemenitica (AMJ), A. m. carnica (AMC), and A. m. ligustica (AML)] to water and different concentrations (0.00001, [...] Read more.
The proboscis extension response (PER) assay revealed the responsiveness of three subspecies of the honeybee Apis mellifera [A. m. jemenitica (AMJ), A. m. carnica (AMC), and A. m. ligustica (AML)] to water and different concentrations (0.00001, 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 M) of three sugars (fructose, glucose, and sucrose) during the summer and fall seasons. The tested bee subspecies showed significantly different PERs to sugar types across the seasons. The water responsiveness of AMJ, a native bee subspecies, was significantly lower than that of AMC and AML, which showed an equally higher water response in both seasons. During the summer season, AMJ and AMC were equally responsive to each sugar type at all tested concentrations. AML was relatively less responsive to glucose at 0.001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 M than to fructose and sucrose during the summer season. During the fall season, AMJ was equally responsive to glucose and sucrose at all tested concentrations but showed a significantly different response between fructose and sucrose at 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 M concentrations. The PER of AMJ to fructose was lower than that of glucose and sucrose. AMC was equally responsive to all tested sugars at all concentrations, and AML showed a differential response between glucose and sucrose at different concentrations during the fall season. The inter-specific species comparisons revealed that all tested subspecies were equally responsive to fructose at all tested concentrations, and AMJ was more responsive to glucose and sucrose than AMC and AML during both seasons. AMC and AML showed no differences in PER to glucose and sucrose in either season. The AMJ, AMC, and AML nectar and pollen foragers showed no significant differences in PER to glucose and sucrose. The AMC nectar foragers were highly responsive to sucrose than pollen foragers at higher sucrose concentrations (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 M). The AML (nectar forager vs. pollen forgers) showed identical PER to sucrose and glucose but a higher response of nectar foragers to high glucose concentrations (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 M) than pollen foragers. For water responsiveness, AMJ nectar and pollen foragers showed similar PER to water, whereas AMC and AML pollen foragers were significantly more responsive to water than nectar foragers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Animal and Human Stresses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 2128 KB  
Communication
Low-Level Fluvalinate Treatment in the Larval Stage Induces Impaired Olfactory Associative Behavior of Honey Bee Workers in the Field
by Chong-Yu Ko, Yu-Shin Nai, Wei Lo, Chun-Ting Chen and Yue-Wen Chen
Insects 2022, 13(3), 273; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13030273 - 10 Mar 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4723
Abstract
Fluvalinate is a widely used insecticide for varroa mite control in apiculture. While most beekeepers have ignored the effects of low levels of fluvalinate on bees, this study aims to demonstrate its effects at very low concentrations. We first used fluvalinate doses ranging [...] Read more.
Fluvalinate is a widely used insecticide for varroa mite control in apiculture. While most beekeepers have ignored the effects of low levels of fluvalinate on bees, this study aims to demonstrate its effects at very low concentrations. We first used fluvalinate doses ranging from 0.4 to 400 ng/larva to monitor the capping, pupation, and emergence rates of larval bees. Second, we used the honey bees’ proboscis extension reflex reaction to test the learning ability of adult bees that were exposed to fluvalinate doses from 0.004 to 4 ng/larva in the larval stage. The brood-capped rate of larvae decreased dramatically when the dose was increased to 40 ng/larva. Although no significant effect was observed on brood-capping, pupation, and eclosion rates with a dose of 4 ng/larva, we found that the olfactory associative behavior of adult bees was impaired when they were treated with sublethal doses from 0.004 to 4 ng/larva in the larval stage. These findings suggest that a sublethal dose of fluvalinate given to larvae affects the subsequent associative ability of adult honey bee workers. Thus, a very low dose may affect the survival conditions of the entire colony. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Advanced in Honey Bee and Apitherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 703 KB  
Article
Effect of Immune Inducers on Nosema ceranae Multiplication and Their Impact on Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Survivorship and Behaviors
by Pegah Valizadeh, Ernesto Guzman-Novoa and Paul H. Goodwin
Insects 2020, 11(9), 572; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11090572 - 26 Aug 2020
Cited by 35 | Viewed by 5434
Abstract
Nosema disease is a major disease of honey bees caused by two species of microsporidia, Nosema apis and N. ceranae. Current control involves using antibiotics, which is undesirable because of possible antibiotic resistance and contamination. In this study, flagellin, zymosan, chitosan, and [...] Read more.
Nosema disease is a major disease of honey bees caused by two species of microsporidia, Nosema apis and N. ceranae. Current control involves using antibiotics, which is undesirable because of possible antibiotic resistance and contamination. In this study, flagellin, zymosan, chitosan, and peptidoglycan were investigated as alternatives for controlling N. ceranae infections and for their effect on bee survivorship and behaviors. Chitosan and peptidoglycan significantly reduced the infection, and significantly increased survivorship of infected bees, with chitosan being more effective. However, neither compound altered the bees’ hygienic behavior, which was also not affected by the infection. Chitosan significantly increased pollen foraging and both compounds significantly increased non-pollen foraging compared to healthy and infected bees. Memory retention, evaluated with the proboscis extension reflex assay, was temporarily impaired by chitosan but was not affected by peptidoglycan, nor was it affected by N. ceranae infection compared to the non-infected bees. This study indicates that chitosan and peptidoglycan provide benefits by partially reducing N. ceranae spore numbers while increasing survivorship compared to N. ceranae infected bees. Also, chitosan and peptidoglycan improved aspects of foraging behavior even more than in healthy bees, showing that they may act as stimulators of important honey bee behaviors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop