Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = premium IOLs

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
8 pages, 449 KiB  
Article
Feasibility and Postoperative Outcome After Duet Procedure for Reversible Multifocality in Eyes with Co-Pathologies
by Barbara S. Brunner, Martin Dirisamer, Nikolaus Luft, Stefan Kassumeh and Siegfried G. Priglinger
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5583; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155583 - 7 Aug 2025
Viewed by 388
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the simultaneous implantation of a monofocal capsular bag-fixated and a trifocal supplementary sulcus-fixated intraocular lens (duet procedure) in eyes with co-existing pathologies undergoing cataract or refractive lens surgery. Methods: In total, 80 eyes [...] Read more.
Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the simultaneous implantation of a monofocal capsular bag-fixated and a trifocal supplementary sulcus-fixated intraocular lens (duet procedure) in eyes with co-existing pathologies undergoing cataract or refractive lens surgery. Methods: In total, 80 eyes of 40 consecutive patients, who underwent refractive lens exchange or cataract surgery and received the duet procedure due to minor co-pathologies, were included in this retrospective case series. Preoperative assessment comprised slit-lamp biomicroscopy, optical biometry, posterior-segment optical coherence tomography, corneal endothelial specular microscopy, corneal tomography, manifest refraction and distance and near visual acuity testing. Three months postoperatively, uncorrected distance (UDVA) and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) were recorded. Results: The preoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) was −0.31 ± 4.29 diopters (D), with a mean refractive astigmatism of −0.80 ± 0.60 D. At three months postoperatively, monocular UDVA and binocular UNVA significantly improved from 0.52 ± 0.42 logMAR and 0.32 ± 0.27 logMAR to 0.05 ± 0.09 logMAR and −0.03 ± 0.10 logMAR, respectively (both p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Reversible multifocality provided by the duet procedure appears to be a feasible option in eyes with mild co-existing pathologies, as it yields satisfactory visual and refractive outcomes with high safety. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 4132 KiB  
Article
Analysis of the Effect of Pupil Size and Corneal Aberration on the Optical Performance of Premium Intraocular Lenses
by Juan J. Miret, Vicente J. Camps, Celia García, Maria T. Caballero, Antonio Sempere-Molina and Juan M. Gonzalez-Leal
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5336; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155336 - 29 Jul 2025
Viewed by 366
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To assess the optical performance of two refractive premium IOLs across pupil sizes and values of corneal spherical aberration (SA). Methods: Two refractive IOLs were evaluated in this study: Tecnis Eyhance and Mini Well. The surface profiles were obtained to [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To assess the optical performance of two refractive premium IOLs across pupil sizes and values of corneal spherical aberration (SA). Methods: Two refractive IOLs were evaluated in this study: Tecnis Eyhance and Mini Well. The surface profiles were obtained to calculate the through-object MTF (TO MTF) curves and simulate optotype images. Entrance pupil sizes ranging from 2 to 5.5 and three corneal models were analyzed in the simulation: an average population aberrated cornea, an aberration-free cornea and a post-Lasik myopic cornea. Results: For Model 1 and pupil sizes between 3.0 and 3.5 mm, Mini Well provided acceptable visual quality from far to near distances, whereas Eyhance struggled to maintain visual quality at distances closer than intermediate. For patients with lower-than-normal corneal SA (i.e., more prolate corneas, such as post-hyperopic LASIK) both IOLs exhibited a hyperopic shift in far focus. Conversely, for patients with higher-than-normal corneal SA (i.e., more oblate corneas, such as post-myopic LASIK), the shift occurred in the myopic direction. Despite the implementation of an optimized IOL power to circumvent any shift, the TO MTF nevertheless reflected the interaction between corneal and IOL SA. Furthermore, the Mini Well demonstrated increased tolerance to less negative SA values, while Eyhance exhibited behavior consistent with a monofocal lens for more positive SA values. Conclusions: Surgeons should consider each patient’s corneal asphericity and typical pupil diameter when selecting and calculating the power of the premium IOLs studied, particularly in patients with a history of refractive surgery. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 832 KiB  
Article
Unhappy 20/20: A New Challenge for Cataract Surgery
by Chiara De Gregorio, Sebastiano Nunziata, Sara Spelta, Paolo Lauretti, Vincenzo Barone, Pier Luigi Surico, Tommaso Mori, Marco Coassin and Antonio Di Zazzo
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1408; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051408 - 20 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1032
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Cataract surgery has evolved into a refractive procedure aimed at optimizing both vision quality and quantity. Modern patients, particularly “baby boomers”, expect superior outcomes, increasing demand for premium intraocular lenses (IOLs). However, ocular surface dysfunction (OSD), especially dry eye disease (DED), compromises [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Cataract surgery has evolved into a refractive procedure aimed at optimizing both vision quality and quantity. Modern patients, particularly “baby boomers”, expect superior outcomes, increasing demand for premium intraocular lenses (IOLs). However, ocular surface dysfunction (OSD), especially dry eye disease (DED), compromises postoperative satisfaction, with up to 35% of patients dissatisfied despite achieving 20/20 visual acuity. This study aimed to characterize postsurgical ocular surface system failure (OSSF) and explore strategies to improve perioperative management. Methods: An open observational study was conducted at the Ophthalmology Complex Operative Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy, enrolling 20 patients with stage N2–3 and C1–2 lens opacities. Patients with diabetes, prior surgeries, or ocular inflammatory diseases were excluded. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included OSDI, SANDE scores, Schirmer test, TBUT, and fluorescein staining. Follow-ups occurred at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Statistical analysis used two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Results: Despite achieving a BCVA of 20/20, 44% of patients reported OSSF symptoms. Postoperative evaluations revealed significant worsening in OSDI and SANDE scores (p < 0.001), Schirmer test (preoperative mean 19.92 ± 10.06; p < 0.001), and TBUT (preoperative mean 5.88 ± 2.64 s; p < 0.001). Meibomian gland dysfunction and conjunctival hyperemia also worsened. Conclusions: Postsurgical OSSF results from neurogenic inflammation, tear film instability, and meibomian gland dysfunction, exacerbated by surgical trauma. Preoperative and postoperative management, including artificial tears, lid hygiene, and preservative-free regimens, are essential to improve outcomes and patient satisfaction. Comprehensive strategies can mitigate symptoms and enhance the benefits of cataract surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1104 KiB  
Article
Refractive Outcomes After Cataract Surgery—The Impact of Preoperative Visual Acuity, the Intraocular Lens Model, and the Surgeon’s Experience: An Empirical Analysis of Hungarian and Kosovan Patients
by Flaka Shoshi, Fitore Shoshi, Agim Xhafa and Zoltán Zsolt Nagy
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(23), 7013; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237013 - 21 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1928
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation comprise a standard procedure for cataract treatment. However, minimal refractive error remains a determinant of postoperative results. Our study aimed to evaluate the refractive outcomes and the impact of the surgeon’s experience and the IOL model [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation comprise a standard procedure for cataract treatment. However, minimal refractive error remains a determinant of postoperative results. Our study aimed to evaluate the refractive outcomes and the impact of the surgeon’s experience and the IOL model on Kosovan and Hungarian patients after cataract surgery. Methods: This study included the preoperative and postoperative data of 1417 patients scheduled to undergo cataract surgery with IOL implantation at two centers: the Ophthalmology Department of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary, and the Ophthalmology Department of the University Clinical Center of Kosovo, Prishtina, Kosovo. STATA and SPSS were used for statistical analysis. Results: The data of 1001 Hungarian and 416 Kosovan patients were included in this study. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in the 1-month postoperative best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) (p = 0.001); in the Hungarian patients, the 1-month BCDVA was 85.2%, while in the Kosovan patients, it was 49.6%. Of the 14 different IOLs implanted in the Hungarian patients, the AcrySof IQ toric SN6AT, FineVision HP (POD F GF), and 677MTY IOLs resulted in a statistically significant positive impact on the 1-month postoperative visual acuity (p < 0.05). The AcrySof SA60AT and Akreos ADAPT AO, implanted in the Kosovan patients, had a statistically significant positive impact on the 1-month postoperative visual acuity (p < 0.05). More extensive surgeon experience had a statistically significant positive impact on postoperative outcomes (p < 0.00). Conclusions: Multifocal and toric IOLs showed superiority in terms of postoperative outcomes in our study; therefore, we conclude that greater surgeon experience, the availability of premium IOLs, and appropriate IOL selection have a considerable impact on refractive outcomes after cataract surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Public Health and Healthcare in the Context of Big Data)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1913 KiB  
Article
Optical Bench Evaluation of a Novel, Hydrophobic, Acrylic, One-Piece, Polyfocal Intraocular Lens with a “Zig-Zag” L-Loop Haptic Design
by Andreas F. Borkenstein, Eva-Maria Borkenstein, Pooria Omidi and Achim Langenbucher
Vision 2024, 8(4), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision8040066 - 14 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1322
Abstract
Purpose: The number of presbyopia-correcting (premium) intraocular lenses (IOLs) is growing steadily as the desire for spectacle independence after cataract surgery increases. The aim of this laboratory study was to evaluate a newly launched hydrophobic, acrylic, polyfocal, refractive intraocular lens with a new [...] Read more.
Purpose: The number of presbyopia-correcting (premium) intraocular lenses (IOLs) is growing steadily as the desire for spectacle independence after cataract surgery increases. The aim of this laboratory study was to evaluate a newly launched hydrophobic, acrylic, polyfocal, refractive intraocular lens with a new optical design and geometry. This polyfocal IOL has three different zones (within the optic) with radially asymmetric design. Methods: We performed optical bench tests to calculate the optical characteristics of the sample. The optical performance and quality of IOLs based on ISO 11979-2 and 11979-9 requirements were analyzed with the NIMO TR0815 (Lambda-X). In addition, optical quality metrics were evaluated with the IOLA MFD device (Rotlex). Sphere, Add, modulation transfer function (MTF), the energy distribution between the modes and the MTF along the whole range from far to near were analyzed. Results: The power histogram showed that the tested IOL has the characteristics of a polyfocal IOL with a wide range of optical power between 20.5 and 24.5 diopters. Two distinct peaks were observed, indicating bifocal functionality. In the radial and axial power surface map, all three zones, stated by the company, could be detected. Larger apertures lead to a significant increase in MTF at the far peak, indicating better visual acuity for distant objects under low-light conditions. It was observed that in small aperture sizes, intermediate vision seems to be dominant. The energy distribution remained almost constant with increasing aperture size. Conclusions: This laboratory study was able to confirm the properties of the polyfocal lens stated by the company. Three optical zones could be identified. However, further optical bench tests should be performed to evaluate the new lens under tilted and decentered conditions. Clinical studies have to confirm that the presbyopia-correcting, polyfocal lens can achieve good clinical results with high patient satisfaction without disturbing side effects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 732 KiB  
Systematic Review
Premium Intraocular Lenses in Glaucoma—A Systematic Review
by Ashley Shuen Ying Hong, Bryan Chin Hou Ang, Emily Dorairaj and Syril Dorairaj
Bioengineering 2023, 10(9), 993; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10090993 - 22 Aug 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3506
Abstract
The incidence of both cataract and glaucoma is increasing globally. With increasing patient expectation and improved technology, premium intraocular lenses (IOLs), including presbyopia-correcting and toric IOLs, are being increasingly implanted today. However, concerns remain regarding the use of premium IOLs, particularly presbyopia-correcting IOLs, [...] Read more.
The incidence of both cataract and glaucoma is increasing globally. With increasing patient expectation and improved technology, premium intraocular lenses (IOLs), including presbyopia-correcting and toric IOLs, are being increasingly implanted today. However, concerns remain regarding the use of premium IOLs, particularly presbyopia-correcting IOLs, in eyes with glaucoma. This systematic review evaluates the use of premium IOLs in glaucoma. A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE database was performed from inception until 1 June 2023. Initial search yielded 1404 records, of which 12 were included in the final review of post-operative outcomes. Studies demonstrated high spectacle independence for distance and good patient satisfaction in glaucomatous eyes, with positive outcomes also in post-operative visual acuity, residual astigmatism, and contrast sensitivity. Considerations in patient selection include anatomical and functional factors, such as the type and severity of glaucomatous visual field defects, glaucoma subtype, presence of ocular surface disease, ocular changes after glaucoma surgery, and the reliability of disease monitoring, all of which may be affected by, or influence, the outcomes of premium IOL implantation in glaucoma patients. Regular reviews on this topic are needed in order to keep up with the rapid advancements in IOL technology and glaucoma surgical treatments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Meeting Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Glaucoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1600 KiB  
Article
In Vitro Chromatic Performance of Three Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses with Different Optical Designs
by Diego Montagud-Martínez, Vicente Ferrando, Anabel Martínez-Espert, Salvador Garcia-Delpech, Juan A. Monsoriu and Walter D. Furlan
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(5), 1212; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051212 - 24 Feb 2022
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2847
Abstract
Most of the new premium models of intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction use diffractive optics in their optical design. The presence of multiple foci and the difference of the diffractive efficiency for different wavelengths have a great impact in the lens optical performance. [...] Read more.
Most of the new premium models of intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction use diffractive optics in their optical design. The presence of multiple foci and the difference of the diffractive efficiency for different wavelengths have a great impact in the lens optical performance. In this context, there is a limited information available for clinicians to understand the optical principles that differentiate each design and their potential influence on clinical outcomes. Optical bench studies with polychromatic light are necessary to solve this limitation. In this work, a custom made optical bench was employed to assess with polychromatic light the through the focus optical quality of three different IOL designs: trifocal, EDOF effect; and enhanced monofocal. By using different and complimentary approaches: images of the USAF test, axial PSFs and TF-MTFs, each design revealed its intrinsic features, which were not previously reported for these IOLs models in a comparative way. It was found that the chromatic aberration plays a very important role in the performance of each IOL. Our results could help clinicians to understand the optical principle of each lens and also provide useful information for choosing the lens that best suits the needs of the individual patient. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hot Topics in PRESBYOPIA 2021)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

7 pages, 495 KiB  
Article
Retinal Optical Quality of Multifocal Refractive and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
by Francesco D’Oria, Ali Nowrouzi, Jorge L. Alio del Barrio, Francesco Versaci and Jorge L. Alio
Photonics 2021, 8(12), 559; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8120559 - 8 Dec 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3135
Abstract
(1) Background: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical optical image quality following implantation with different premium IOLs by the analysis of the point spread function (PSF) Strehl ratio using a Pyramidal WaveFront-based sensor (PWS) aberrometer at two different pupil sizes. [...] Read more.
(1) Background: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical optical image quality following implantation with different premium IOLs by the analysis of the point spread function (PSF) Strehl ratio using a Pyramidal WaveFront-based sensor (PWS) aberrometer at two different pupil sizes. (2) Methods: This study included 96 eyes of 70 patients implanted with: (1) 19 AcrySof SA60AT (control group); (2) 24 LENTIS Mplus LS-313 MF30; (3) 33 LENTIS Mplus LS-313 MF15; and (4) 20 Precizon Presbyopic. Main outcome measures were PSF Strehl ratio, PSF Strehl ratio excluding second-order aberrations (PSFw2), total root-mean-square (RMS), and low- and high-order aberrations’ RMS measured by PWS aberrometer. Results: SA60AT had the highest significant PSFw2 Strehl ratio at both 3- and 4-mm pupil size (0.41 ± 0.11 and 0.28 ± 0.07) followed by LENTIS Mplus 15 (group C, 0.35 ± 0.1 and 0.21 ± 0.06) and a near tie between LENTIS MPLUS 30 (group B, 0.27 ± 0.08 and 0.18 ± 0.06) and Precizon Presbyopic (group D, 0.27 ± 0.07 and 0.17 ± 0.04). MPlus MF15 was found to be significantly better than MPlus MF30 at both 3.00 mm (p < 0.0001) and 4.00 mm (p = 0.002). (4) Conclusions: The PSFw2 represents a new tool to objectively evaluate the far distance retinal image quality of multifocal IOLs, and the far distance clinical image quality parameters measured by PWS aberrometer differed significantly according to the technology of the implanted lens. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Visual Optics and Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop