Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (9)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = phytophthora root rot disease (PRR)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 6999 KiB  
Article
Integrated Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis Reveals Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Resistance to Phytophthora Root Rot
by Ruidong Sun, Anan Han, Haitang Wang, Congcong Wang, Yang Lu, Danqing Ni, Na Guo, Han Xing and Jinming Zhao
Plants 2024, 13(12), 1705; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13121705 - 19 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2126
Abstract
Soybean production is significantly impacted by Phytophthora root rot (PRR), which is caused by Phytophthora sojae. The nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) gene family plays a crucial role in plant disease resistance. However, current understanding of the function of soybean NLR genes in [...] Read more.
Soybean production is significantly impacted by Phytophthora root rot (PRR), which is caused by Phytophthora sojae. The nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) gene family plays a crucial role in plant disease resistance. However, current understanding of the function of soybean NLR genes in resistance to PRR is limited. To address this knowledge gap, transgenic soybean plants overexpressing the NLR gene (Glyma.18g283200) were generated to elucidate the molecular mechanism of resistance. Here, transcript changes and metabolic differences were investigated at three time points (12, 24, and 36 h) after P. sojae infection in hypocotyls of two soybean lines, Dongnong 50 (susceptible line, WT) and Glyma.18g283200 overexpression line (resistant line, OE). Based on the changes in differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in response to P. sojae infection in different lines and at different time points, it was speculated that HOPZ-ACTIVATED RESISTANCE 1 (ZAR1), valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation, and phytohormone signaling may be involved in the defense response of soybean to P. sojae at the transcriptome level by GO term and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. Differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs) analysis revealed that a total of 223 and 210 differential metabolites were identified in the positive ion (POS) and negative ion (NEG) modes, respectively. An integrated pathway-level analysis of transcriptomics (obtained by RNA-seq) and metabolomics data revealed that isoflavone biosynthesis was associated with disease resistance. This work provides valuable insights that can be used in breeding programs aiming to enhance soybean resistance against PRR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Physiology and Crop Production)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1342 KiB  
Article
Selection for Phytophthora Root Rot Resistance in Chickpea Crosses Affects Yield Potential of Chickpea × Cicer echinospermum Backcross Derivatives
by Sean L. Bithell, Muhammd A. Asif, David Backhouse, Andre Drenth, Steve Harden and Kristy Hobson
Plants 2024, 13(11), 1432; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13111432 - 22 May 2024
Viewed by 1207
Abstract
Phytophthora root rot (PRR) of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) caused by Phytophthora medicaginis is an important disease. Partial resistance to PRR is sourced from Cicer echinospermum. In this study, we evaluated if lines with low levels of PRR foliage symptoms in [...] Read more.
Phytophthora root rot (PRR) of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) caused by Phytophthora medicaginis is an important disease. Partial resistance to PRR is sourced from Cicer echinospermum. In this study, we evaluated if lines with low levels of PRR foliage symptoms in two contrasting recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations parented by chickpea cultivars (Yorker and Rupali) and 04067-81-2-1-1 (C. echinospermum, interspecific breeding line) had a significant drag on yield parameters. For the Yorker × 04067-81-2-1-1 population with the highest level of PRR resistance, in the absence of PRR, low foliage symptom RIL had significantly later flowering and podding, lower grain yields, and lighter seed and shorter plant phenotypes than high foliage symptom RIL. A quantitative trait locus analysis identified significant QTL for flowering, height, 100-seed weight, and yield, and there was a significantly higher frequency of alleles for the negative agronomic traits (i.e., drag) from the 04067-81-2-1-1 parent in low foliage symptom RIL than in high foliage symptom RIL. For the Rupali × 04067-81-2-1-1 population with lower levels of PRR resistance, in the absence of PRR, low foliage symptom RIL had significantly lighter seed and shorter plants than high foliage symptom RIL. Significant QTL were detected, the majority were for the timing of flowering and podding (n = 18), others were for plant height, yield, and 100-seed weight. For this second population, the frequency of alleles for the negative agronomic traits from the 04067-81-2-1-1 parent did not differ between low and high foliage symptom RIL. The 100 seed weight of RIL under moderate PRR disease pressure showed some promise as a yield component trait to identify phenotypes with both high levels of PRR resistance and grain yield potential for further seed number evaluations. We identified that large population sizes are required to enable selection among chickpea × C. echinospermum crosses for high levels of PRR resistance without a significant drag on yield. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Legume Crops Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1566 KiB  
Article
Rapid and High Throughput Hydroponics Phenotyping Method for Evaluating Chickpea Resistance to Phytophthora Root Rot
by Muhammad A. Asif, Sean L. Bithell, Ramethaa Pirathiban, Brian R. Cullis, David Glyn Dionaldo Hughes, Aidan McGarty, Nicole Dron and Kristy Hobson
Plants 2023, 12(23), 4069; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12234069 - 4 Dec 2023
Viewed by 2051
Abstract
Phytophthora root rot (PRR) is a major constraint to chickpea production in Australia. Management options for controlling the disease are limited to crop rotation and avoiding high risk paddocks for planting. Current Australian cultivars have partial PRR resistance, and new sources of resistance [...] Read more.
Phytophthora root rot (PRR) is a major constraint to chickpea production in Australia. Management options for controlling the disease are limited to crop rotation and avoiding high risk paddocks for planting. Current Australian cultivars have partial PRR resistance, and new sources of resistance are needed to breed cultivars with improved resistance. Field- and glasshouse-based PRR resistance phenotyping methods are labour intensive, time consuming, and provide seasonally variable results; hence, these methods limit breeding programs’ abilities to screen large numbers of genotypes. In this study, we developed a new space saving (400 plants/m2), rapid (<12 days), and simplified hydroponics-based PRR phenotyping method, which eliminated seedling transplant requirements following germination and preparation of zoospore inoculum. The method also provided post-phenotyping propagation all the way through to seed production for selected high-resistance lines. A test of 11 diverse chickpea genotypes provided both qualitative (PRR symptoms) and quantitative (amount of pathogen DNA in roots) results demonstrating that the method successfully differentiated between genotypes with differing PRR resistance. Furthermore, PRR resistance hydroponic assessment results for 180 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) were correlated strongly with the field-based phenotyping, indicating the field phenotype relevance of this method. Finally, post-phenotyping high-resistance genotypes were selected. These were successfully transplanted and propagated all the way through to seed production; this demonstrated the utility of the rapid hydroponics method (RHM) for selection of individuals from segregating populations. The RHM will facilitate the rapid identification and propagation of new PRR resistance sources, especially in large breeding populations at early evaluation stages. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Legume Crops Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 719 KiB  
Review
Phytophthora sansomeana, an Emerging Threat to Soybean Production
by Christopher Evan Detranaltes, Jianxin Ma and Guohong Cai
Agronomy 2022, 12(8), 1769; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081769 - 28 Jul 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2726
Abstract
In 1990, new Phytophthora strains, later recognized as a new species, Phytophthora sansomeana, were found to cause Phytophthora root rot (PRR) in soybean in addition to P. sojae. The emergence and spread of a second pathogen causing PRR poses a significant [...] Read more.
In 1990, new Phytophthora strains, later recognized as a new species, Phytophthora sansomeana, were found to cause Phytophthora root rot (PRR) in soybean in addition to P. sojae. The emergence and spread of a second pathogen causing PRR poses a significant threat to soybean production. While genetic resistance to P. sojae has been developed and widely deployed as a management tool, these varieties appear largely ineffective at controlling P. sansomeana, which has a broad host-range and can infect and survive on non-leguminous hosts including fir trees, Rosaceous fruit trees, maize, and several herbaceous weeds. This contributes potential for broad distributions worldwide across both agricultural and natural ecosystems. Despite having been studied since the 1980s under a variety of informal designations, little is known about the epidemiology, host-interactions, and management of this emergent pathogen. Due to the lack of management options, increased frequency of first reports in new geographic areas, and the overall limited body of knowledge surrounding this novel pathogen, P. sansomeana warrants more research attention from both biological and disease management perspectives. The aim of this review is to summarize the hosts, distribution, pathogenicity, and current management strategies of P. sansomeana and to provide a concise record of where it has been studied under other informal designations. Its role in PRR of soybean is emphasized due to the economic magnitude of PRR-associated losses and its well-documented aggressiveness as a soybean pathogen. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Soybean Phytophthora Diseases Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 5507 KiB  
Article
Genome-Wide Association Study of Partial Resistance to P. sojae in Wild Soybeans from Heilongjiang Province, China
by Wei Li, Miao Liu, Yong-Cai Lai, Jian-Xin Liu, Chao Fan, Guang Yang, Ling Wang, Wen-Wei Liang, Shu-Feng Di, De-Yue Yu and Ying-Dong Bi
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(7), 3194-3207; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44070221 - 17 Jul 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2872
Abstract
Phytophthora root rot (PRR) is a destructive disease of soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr) caused by Phytophthora sojae (P. sojae). The most effective way to prevent the disease is growing resistant or tolerant varieties. Partial resistance provides a more durable [...] Read more.
Phytophthora root rot (PRR) is a destructive disease of soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr) caused by Phytophthora sojae (P. sojae). The most effective way to prevent the disease is growing resistant or tolerant varieties. Partial resistance provides a more durable resistance against the pathogen compared to complete resistance. Wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. & Zucc.) seems to be an extraordinarily important gene pool for soybean improvement due to its high level of genetic variation. In this study, 242 wild soybean germplasms originating from different regions of Heilongjiang province were used to identify resistance genes to P. sojae race 1 using a genome-wide association study (GWAS). A total of nine significant SNPs were detected, repeatedly associated with P. sojae resistance and located on chromosomes 1, 10, 12, 15, 17, 19 and 20. Among them, seven favorable allelic variations associated with P. sojae resistance were evaluated by a t-test. Eight candidate genes were predicted to explore the mechanistic hypotheses of partial resistance, including Glysoja.19G051583, which encodes an LRR receptor-like serine/threonine protein kinase protein, Glysoja.19G051581, which encodes a receptor-like cytosolic serine/threonine protein kinase protein. These findings will provide additional insights into the genetic architecture of P. sojae resistance in a large sample of wild soybeans and P. sojae-resistant breeding through marker-assisted selection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Genomics and Comparative Genomics Analysis in Plants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 12932 KiB  
Review
Phytophthora Root Rot: Importance of the Disease, Current and Novel Methods of Control
by María L. Giachero, Stéphane Declerck and Nathalie Marquez
Agronomy 2022, 12(3), 610; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030610 - 28 Feb 2022
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 8519
Abstract
Phytophthora sojae is a pathogen of major agricultural importance, responsible for Phytophthora root rot (PRR) in soybean crops, which can cause significant yield losses each year. The severity of the disease depends on the soybean cultivar, its growth stage at the time of [...] Read more.
Phytophthora sojae is a pathogen of major agricultural importance, responsible for Phytophthora root rot (PRR) in soybean crops, which can cause significant yield losses each year. The severity of the disease depends on the soybean cultivar, its growth stage at the time of pathogen infection, and the environmental conditions. High soil moisture and temperature around 25–30 °C are favorable conditions for the development of the disease. Consequently, cultural practices are mainly limited to avoiding bad weather (high moisture) during the sowing or to promoting soil drainage. The use of chemical fungicides is restricted to seed treatments when there is a high risk of disease development. Currently the most economical option for controlling P. sojae is the use of host resistance. However, even if breeding is the main control strategy of PRR, the use of resistant cultivars leads to selection pressure on P. sojae populations, which can lead to high variability of the pathogen and therefore to its adaptation to overcome plant resistance. New strategies are therefore needed, including the use of biological control agents (BCAs). The use of BCAs (i.e., microorganisms or their metabolites) is a promising and sustainable alternative to PRR control that should be strengthened. Therefore, this review addresses the P. sojae–soybean interaction, mechanisms of pathogenicity and host resistance, as well as current and new management strategies with emphasis on the biological control of P. sojae and its associated mechanisms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Soybean Phytophthora Diseases Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3148 KiB  
Article
Cause of Death: Phytophthora or Flood? Effects of Waterlogging on Phytophthora medicaginis and Resistance of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)
by Nicole Dron, Steven Simpfendorfer, Tim Sutton, Georgina Pengilley and Kristy Hobson
Agronomy 2022, 12(1), 89; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010089 - 30 Dec 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3228
Abstract
Chickpea production in Australia is constrained by both waterlogging and the root disease Phytophthora root rot (PRR). Soil saturation is an important pre-condition for significant disease development for many soil-borne Phytophthora spp. In wet years, water can pool in low lying areas within [...] Read more.
Chickpea production in Australia is constrained by both waterlogging and the root disease Phytophthora root rot (PRR). Soil saturation is an important pre-condition for significant disease development for many soil-borne Phytophthora spp. In wet years, water can pool in low lying areas within a field, resulting in waterlogging, which, in the presence of PRR, can result in a significant yield loss for Australian chickpea varieties. In these circumstances, the specific cause of death is often difficult to discern, as the damage is rapid and the spread of PRR can be explosive in nature. The present study describes the impact of soil waterlogging on oxygen availability and the ability of P. medicaginis to infect chickpea plants. Late waterlogging in combination with PRR reduced the total plant biomass by an average of 94%; however, waterlogging alone accounted for 88% of this loss across three reference genotypes. Additional experiments found that under hypoxic conditions associated with waterlogging, P. medicaganis did not proliferate as determined by zoospore counts and DNA detection using qPCR. Consequently, minimizing waterlogging damage through breeding and agronomic practices should be a key priority for integrated disease management, as waterlogging alone results in plant stunting, yield loss and a reduced resistance to PRR. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3201 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Canopy Porosity in Avocado Trees as a Surrogate for Restricted Transpiration Emanating from Phytophthora Root Rot
by Arachchige Surantha Ashan Salgadoe, Andrew James Robson, David William Lamb and Elizabeth Kathryn Dann
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(24), 2972; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11242972 - 11 Dec 2019
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4629
Abstract
Phytophthora root rot (PRR) disease is a major threat in avocado orchards, causing extensive production loss and tree death if left unmanaged. Regular assessment of tree health is required to enable implementation of the best agronomic management practices. Visual canopy appraisal methods such [...] Read more.
Phytophthora root rot (PRR) disease is a major threat in avocado orchards, causing extensive production loss and tree death if left unmanaged. Regular assessment of tree health is required to enable implementation of the best agronomic management practices. Visual canopy appraisal methods such as the scoring of defoliation are subjective and subject to human error and inconsistency. Quantifying canopy porosity using red, green and blue (RGB) colour imagery offers an objective alternative. However, canopy defoliation, and porosity is considered a ‘lag indicator’ of PRR disease, which, through root damage, incurs water stress. Restricted transpiration is considered a ‘lead indicator’, and this study sought to compare measured canopy porosity with the restricted transpiration resulting from PRR disease, as indicated by canopy temperature. Canopy porosity was calculated from RGB imagery acquired by a smartphone and the restricted transpiration was estimated using thermal imagery acquired by a FLIR B250 hand-held thermal camera. A sample of 85 randomly selected trees were used to obtain RGB imagery from the shaded side of the canopy and thermal imagery from both shaded and sunlit segments of the canopy; the latter were used to derive the differential values of mean canopy temperature (Δ Tmean), crop water stress index (Δ CWSI), and stomatal conductance index (Δ Ig). Canopy porosity was observed to be exponentially, inversely correlated with Δ CWSI and Δ Ig (R2 > 90%). The nature of the relationship also points to the use of canopy porosity at early stages of canopy decline, where defoliation has only just commenced and detection is often beyond the capability of subjective human assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing in Agriculture and Vegetation)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 16137 KiB  
Article
Quantifying the Severity of Phytophthora Root Rot Disease in Avocado Trees Using Image Analysis
by Arachchige Surantha Ashan Salgadoe, Andrew James Robson, David William Lamb, Elizabeth Kathryn Dann and Christopher Searle
Remote Sens. 2018, 10(2), 226; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10020226 - 1 Feb 2018
Cited by 60 | Viewed by 11807
Abstract
Phytophthora root rot (PRR) infects the roots of avocado trees, resulting in reduced uptake of water and nutrients, canopy decline, defoliation, and, eventually, tree mortality. Typically, the severity of PRR disease (proportion of canopy decline) is assessed by visually comparing the canopy health [...] Read more.
Phytophthora root rot (PRR) infects the roots of avocado trees, resulting in reduced uptake of water and nutrients, canopy decline, defoliation, and, eventually, tree mortality. Typically, the severity of PRR disease (proportion of canopy decline) is assessed by visually comparing the canopy health of infected trees to a standardised set of photographs and a corresponding disease rating. Although this visual method provides some indication of the spatial variability of PRR disease across orchards, the accuracy and repeatability of the ranking is influenced by the experience of the assessor, the visibility of tree canopies, and the timing of the assessment. This study evaluates two image analysis methods that may serve as surrogates to the visual assessment of canopy decline in large avocado orchards. A smartphone camera was used to collect red, green, and blue (RGB) colour images of individual trees with varying degrees of canopy decline, with the digital photographs then analysed to derive a canopy porosity percentage using a combination of ‘Canny edge detection’ and ‘Otsu’s’ methods. Coinciding with the on-ground measure of canopy porosity, the canopy reflectance characteristics of the sampled trees measured by high resolution Worldview-3 (WV-3) satellite imagery was also correlated against the observed disease severity rankings. Canopy porosity values (ranging from 20–70%) derived from RGB images were found to be significantly different for most disease rankings (p < 0.05) and correlated well (R2 = 0.89) with the differentiation of three disease severity levels identified to be optimal. From the WV-3 imagery, a multivariate stepwise regression of 18 structural and pigment-based vegetation indices found the simplified ratio vegetation index (SRVI) to be strongly correlated (R2 = 0.96) with the disease rankings of PRR disease severity, with the differentiation of four levels of severity found to be optimal. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing in Agriculture and Vegetation)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop