Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (10)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = patient-self inflicted lung injury

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 1001 KiB  
Review
Old and New Definitions of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): An Overview of Practical Considerations and Clinical Implications
by Cesare Biuzzi, Elena Modica, Noemi De Filippis, Daria Pizzirani, Benedetta Galgani, Agnese Di Chiaro, Daniele Marianello, Federico Franchi, Fabio Silvio Taccone and Sabino Scolletta
Diagnostics 2025, 15(15), 1930; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15151930 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 324
Abstract
Lower respiratory tract infections remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among Intensive Care Unit patients, with severe cases often progressing to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This life-threatening syndrome results from alveolar–capillary membrane injury, causing refractory hypoxemia and respiratory failure. Early [...] Read more.
Lower respiratory tract infections remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among Intensive Care Unit patients, with severe cases often progressing to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This life-threatening syndrome results from alveolar–capillary membrane injury, causing refractory hypoxemia and respiratory failure. Early detection and management are critical to treat the underlying cause, provide protective lung ventilation, and, eventually, improve patient outcomes. The 2012 Berlin definition standardized ARDS diagnosis but excluded patients on non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) modalities, which are increasingly used, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. By excluding these patients, diagnostic delays can occur, risking the progression of lung injury despite ongoing support. Indeed, sustained, vigorous respiratory efforts under non-invasive modalities carry significant potential for patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI), underscoring the need to broaden diagnostic criteria to encompass these increasingly common therapies. Recent proposals expand ARDS criteria to include NIV and HFNCs, lung ultrasound, and the SpO2/FiO2 ratio adaptations designed to improve diagnosis in resource-limited settings lacking arterial blood gases or advanced imaging. However, broader criteria risk overdiagnosis and create challenges in distinguishing ARDS from other causes of acute hypoxemic failure. Furthermore, inter-observer variability in imaging interpretation and inconsistencies in oxygenation assessment, particularly when relying on non-invasive measurements, may compromise diagnostic reliability. To overcome these limitations, a more nuanced diagnostic framework is needed—one that incorporates individualized therapeutic strategies, emphasizes lung-protective ventilation, and integrates advanced physiological or biomarker-based indicators like IL-6, IL-8, and IFN-γ, which are associated with worse outcomes. Such an approach has the potential to improve patient stratification, enable more targeted interventions, and ultimately support the design and conduct of more effective interventional studies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1868 KiB  
Review
Patient-Self Inflicted Lung Injury (P-SILI): An Insight into the Pathophysiology of Lung Injury and Management
by Himanshu Deshwal, Ahmed Elkhapery, Rudra Ramanathan, Deepak Nair, Isha Singh, Ankur Sinha, Rishik Vashisht and Vikramjit Mukherjee
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1632; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051632 - 27 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 5159
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a heterogeneous group of disease entities that are associated with acute hypoxic respiratory failure and significant morbidity and mortality. With a better understanding and phenotyping of lung injury, novel pathophysiologic mechanisms demonstrate the impact of a patient’s [...] Read more.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a heterogeneous group of disease entities that are associated with acute hypoxic respiratory failure and significant morbidity and mortality. With a better understanding and phenotyping of lung injury, novel pathophysiologic mechanisms demonstrate the impact of a patient’s excessive spontaneous breathing effort on perpetuating lung injury. Patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) is a recently identified phenomenon that delves into the impact of spontaneous breathing on respiratory mechanics in patients with lung injury. While the studies are hypothesis-generating and have been demonstrated in animal and human studies, further clinical trials are needed to identify its impact on ARDS management. The purpose of this review article is to highlight the physiologic mechanisms of P-SILI, novel tools and methods to detect P-SILI, and to review the current literature on non-invasive and invasive respiratory management in patients with ARDS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Acute Respiratory Failure: Innovations and Clinical Insights)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1506 KiB  
Perspective
Challenges in Transitioning from Controlled to Assisted Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Management
by Denise Battaglini and Patricia R. M. Rocco
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(23), 7333; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237333 - 2 Dec 2024
Viewed by 2062
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) presents significant challenges in critical care, primarily due to its inflammatory nature, which leads to impaired gas exchange and respiratory mechanics. While mechanical ventilation (MV) is essential for patient support, the transition from controlled to assisted ventilation is [...] Read more.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) presents significant challenges in critical care, primarily due to its inflammatory nature, which leads to impaired gas exchange and respiratory mechanics. While mechanical ventilation (MV) is essential for patient support, the transition from controlled to assisted ventilation is complex and may be associated with intensive care unit-acquired weakness, ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction and patient self-inflicted lung injury. This paper explores the multifaceted challenges encountered during this transition, with a focus on respiratory effort, sedation management, and monitoring techniques, and investigates innovative approaches to enhance patient outcomes. The key strategies include optimizing sedation protocols, employing advanced monitoring methods like esophageal pressure measurements, and implementing partial neuromuscular blockade to prevent excessive respiratory effort. We also emphasize the importance of personalized treatment plans and the integration of artificial intelligence to facilitate timely transitions. By highlighting early rehabilitation techniques, continuously assessing the respiratory drive, and fostering collaboration among multidisciplinary teams, clinicians can improve the transition from controlled to assisted MV, ultimately enhancing recovery and long-term respiratory health in patients with ARDS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Respiratory Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 938 KiB  
Review
Clinical and Experimental Evidence for Patient Self-Inflicted Lung Injury (P-SILI) and Bedside Monitoring
by Ines Marongiu, Douglas Slobod, Marco Leali, Elena Spinelli and Tommaso Mauri
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4018; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144018 - 10 Jul 2024
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5288
Abstract
Patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) is a major challenge for the ICU physician: although spontaneous breathing is associated with physiological benefits, in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the risk of uncontrolled inspiratory effort leading to additional injury needs to be assessed [...] Read more.
Patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) is a major challenge for the ICU physician: although spontaneous breathing is associated with physiological benefits, in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the risk of uncontrolled inspiratory effort leading to additional injury needs to be assessed to avoid delayed intubation and increased mortality. In the present review, we analyze the available clinical and experimental evidence supporting the existence of lung injury caused by uncontrolled high inspiratory effort, we discuss the pathophysiological mechanisms by which increased effort causes P-SILI, and, finally, we consider the measurements and interpretation of bedside physiological measures of increased drive that should alert the clinician. The data presented in this review could help to recognize injurious respiratory patterns that may trigger P-SILI and to prevent it. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Intensive Care)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2207 KiB  
Review
Personalized Respiratory Support in ARDS: A Physiology-to-Bedside Review
by Salvatore Lucio Cutuli, Domenico Luca Grieco, Teresa Michi, Melania Cesarano, Tommaso Rosà, Gabriele Pintaudi, Luca Salvatore Menga, Ersilia Ruggiero, Valentina Giammatteo, Giuseppe Bello, Gennaro De Pascale and Massimo Antonelli
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(13), 4176; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134176 - 21 Jun 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 5901
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide, and while no specific etiologic interventions have been shown to improve outcomes, noninvasive and invasive respiratory support strategies are life-saving interventions that allow time for lung recovery. However, the [...] Read more.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide, and while no specific etiologic interventions have been shown to improve outcomes, noninvasive and invasive respiratory support strategies are life-saving interventions that allow time for lung recovery. However, the inappropriate management of these strategies, which neglects the unique features of respiratory, lung, and chest wall mechanics may result in disease progression, such as patient self-inflicted lung injury during spontaneous breathing or by ventilator-induced lung injury during invasive mechanical ventilation. ARDS characteristics are highly heterogeneous; therefore, a physiology-based approach is strongly advocated to titrate the delivery and management of respiratory support strategies to match patient characteristics and needs to limit ARDS progression. Several tools have been implemented in clinical practice to aid the clinician in identifying the ARDS sub-phenotypes based on physiological peculiarities (inspiratory effort, respiratory mechanics, and recruitability), thus allowing for the appropriate application of personalized supportive care. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of noninvasive and invasive respiratory support strategies, as well as discuss how identifying ARDS sub-phenotypes in daily practice can help clinicians to deliver personalized respiratory support and potentially improve patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

14 pages, 1495 KiB  
Review
Patient Self-Inflicted Lung Injury—A Narrative Review of Pathophysiology, Early Recognition, and Management Options
by Peter Sklienka, Michal Frelich and Filip Burša
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(4), 593; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040593 - 28 Mar 2023
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 10401
Abstract
Patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) is a life-threatening condition arising from excessive respiratory effort and work of breathing in patients with lung injury. The pathophysiology of P-SILI involves factors related to the underlying lung pathology and vigorous respiratory effort. P-SILI might develop both [...] Read more.
Patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) is a life-threatening condition arising from excessive respiratory effort and work of breathing in patients with lung injury. The pathophysiology of P-SILI involves factors related to the underlying lung pathology and vigorous respiratory effort. P-SILI might develop both during spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilation with preserved spontaneous respiratory activity. In spontaneously breathing patients, clinical signs of increased work of breathing and scales developed for early detection of potentially harmful effort might help clinicians prevent unnecessary intubation, while, on the contrary, identifying patients who would benefit from early intubation. In mechanically ventilated patients, several simple non-invasive methods for assessing the inspiratory effort exerted by the respiratory muscles were correlated with respiratory muscle pressure. In patients with signs of injurious respiratory effort, therapy aimed to minimize this problem has been demonstrated to prevent aggravation of lung injury and, therefore, improve the outcome of such patients. In this narrative review, we accumulated the current information on pathophysiology and early detection of vigorous respiratory effort. In addition, we proposed a simple algorithm for prevention and treatment of P-SILI that is easily applicable in clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Medicine for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS))
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 2092 KiB  
Review
Spontaneous Breathing and Pendelluft in Patients with Acute Lung Injury: A Narrative Review
by Po-Lan Su, Zhanqi Zhao, Yen-Fen Ko, Chang-Wen Chen and Kuo-Sheng Cheng
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(24), 7449; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247449 - 15 Dec 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5344
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by acute-onset rapid-deteriorating inflammatory lung injury. Although the preservation of spontaneous breathing may have physiological benefits in oxygenation, increasing evidence shows that vigorous spontaneous breathing may aggravate lung injury (i.e., patient self-inflicted lung injury). Increased lung [...] Read more.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by acute-onset rapid-deteriorating inflammatory lung injury. Although the preservation of spontaneous breathing may have physiological benefits in oxygenation, increasing evidence shows that vigorous spontaneous breathing may aggravate lung injury (i.e., patient self-inflicted lung injury). Increased lung stress and pendelluft, which is defined as intrapulmonary gas redistribution without a significant change in tidal volume, are important mechanisms of patient self-inflicted lung injury. The presence of pendelluft may be considered a surrogate marker of vigorous inspiratory effort, which can cause the dependent lung to overstretch. In this review, we summarized three major methods for electrical impedance tomography–based pendelluft monitoring. Future studies are warranted to compare and validate the different methods of pendelluft estimation in patients with ARDS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Respiratory Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 320 KiB  
Review
Neuromuscular Blockade in the Pre- and COVID-19 ARDS Patients
by Vasiliki Tsolaki, George E. Zakynthinos, Maria-Eirini Papadonta, Fotini Bardaka, George Fotakopoulos, Ioannis Pantazopoulos, Demosthenes Makris and Epaminondas Zakynthinos
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(9), 1538; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091538 - 19 Sep 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3390
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) accounts for a quarter of mechanically ventilated patients, while during the pandemic, it overwhelmed the capacity of intensive care units (ICUs). Lung protective ventilation (low tidal volume, positive-end expiratory pressure titrated to lung mechanics and oxygenation, permissive hypercapnia) [...] Read more.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) accounts for a quarter of mechanically ventilated patients, while during the pandemic, it overwhelmed the capacity of intensive care units (ICUs). Lung protective ventilation (low tidal volume, positive-end expiratory pressure titrated to lung mechanics and oxygenation, permissive hypercapnia) is a non-pharmacological approach that is the gold standard of management. Among the pharmacological treatments, the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), although extensively studied, has not yet been well clarified. The rationale is to minimize the risk for lung damage progression, in the already-injured pulmonary parenchyma. By abolishing rigorous spontaneous efforts, NMBAs may decrease the generation of high transpulmonary pressures that could aggravate patients’ self-inflicted lung injury. Moreover, NMBAs can harmonize the patient–ventilator interaction. Recent randomized controlled trials reported contradictory results and changed the clinical practice in a bidirectional way. NMBAs have not been documented to improve long-term survival; thus, the current guidance suggests their use only in patients in whom a lung protective ventilation protocol cannot be applied, due to asynchrony or increased respiratory efforts. In the present review, we discuss the published data and additionally the clinical practice in the “war” conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic, concerning NMBA use in the management of patients with ARDS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Medicine in the ICU)
7 pages, 866 KiB  
Review
Respiratory Monitoring at Bedside in COVID-19 Patients
by Davide Giustivi, Francesco Bottazzini and Mirko Belliato
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(21), 4943; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10214943 - 26 Oct 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3898
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced some reflections to be had surrounding the ventilatory support to be applied to certain types of patients. The model of two phenotypes, set out by Professor Gattinoni and colleagues, suggests that adequate monitoring of respiratory effort may [...] Read more.
The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced some reflections to be had surrounding the ventilatory support to be applied to certain types of patients. The model of two phenotypes, set out by Professor Gattinoni and colleagues, suggests that adequate monitoring of respiratory effort may play a key role in the treatment of respiratory failure due to COVID-19. An insufficient control of the patient’s respiratory efforts could lead to an aggravation of lung damage, mainly due to the possibility of generating Patient Self-Inflicted Lung Injury (PSILI) with a consequent aggravation of the pathological picture. Nevertheless, effectively monitoring the patient’s respiratory work, especially in nonintensive settings, is not easy. This article briefly describes some methods that allow the assessment of respiratory effort, such as the use of ultrasound and respiratory tests, which can be performed in nonintensive settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Updates in the Management of Pneumonia and COVID-19)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1606 KiB  
Review
Patient-Self Inflicted Lung Injury: A Practical Review
by Guillaume Carteaux, Mélodie Parfait, Margot Combet, Anne-Fleur Haudebourg, Samuel Tuffet and Armand Mekontso Dessap
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(12), 2738; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10122738 - 21 Jun 2021
Cited by 90 | Viewed by 10697
Abstract
Patients with severe lung injury usually have a high respiratory drive, resulting in intense inspiratory effort that may even worsen lung damage by several mechanisms gathered under the name “patient-self inflicted lung injury” (P-SILI). Even though no clinical study has yet demonstrated that [...] Read more.
Patients with severe lung injury usually have a high respiratory drive, resulting in intense inspiratory effort that may even worsen lung damage by several mechanisms gathered under the name “patient-self inflicted lung injury” (P-SILI). Even though no clinical study has yet demonstrated that a ventilatory strategy to limit the risk of P-SILI can improve the outcome, the concept of P-SILI relies on sound physiological reasoning, an accumulation of clinical observations and some consistent experimental data. In this review, we detail the main pathophysiological mechanisms by which the patient’s respiratory effort could become deleterious: excessive transpulmonary pressure resulting in over-distension; inhomogeneous distribution of transpulmonary pressure variations across the lung leading to cyclic opening/closing of nondependent regions and pendelluft phenomenon; increase in the transvascular pressure favoring the aggravation of pulmonary edema. We also describe potentially harmful patient-ventilator interactions. Finally, we discuss in a practical way how to detect in the clinical setting situations at risk for P-SILI and to what extent this recognition can help personalize the treatment strategy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Acute Respiratory Failure)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop