Search Results (2)

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the effects of bisphosphonates and denosumab on sarcopenia-related parameters, contributing to a better understanding of osteosarcopenia management. Methods: This cross-sectional, comparative study assessed physical performance, muscle strength, muscle mass, and sarcopenia category in postmenopausal women aged 65 to 80 years with osteoporosis who were receiving either bisphosphonates or denosumab. Additional groups consisted of untreated osteoporotic patients and controls without osteoporosis (n = 50 per group). Muscle mass was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis, and the classification of sarcopenia was assessed according to the EWGSOP2 criteria. Results: Among the osteoporotic groups, the 4 m walking speed, 5-chair stand test, and timed up-and-go performance did not differ significantly, although denosumab-treated patients had numerically shorter completion times. Nondominant handgrip strength was the only grip parameter showing a significant between-group difference (p = 0.026), mainly due to higher values in denosumab-treated patients than in untreated osteoporotic patients; dominant and maximum handgrip strength were comparable. Skeletal muscle mass was higher in the denosumab group than in both the bisphosphonate-treated and untreated osteoporosis groups (p = 0.045), whereas ALM, ASM, and the ASMI did not differ significantly. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in SARC-F scores or sarcopenia classifications. Controls had significantly higher odds of sarcopenia absence compared with untreated osteoporotic patients, and treatment duration was not correlated with sarcopenia-related parameters. Conclusions: These findings suggest a favorable but limited association between denosumab treatment and selected muscle-related parameters. Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether anti-osteoporotic therapies influence osteosarcopenia. Full article

Background: Denosumab, a receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL) inhibitor, demonstrates therapeutic effects beyond traditional osteoporosis management through the RANK/RANKL/osteoprotegerin pathway. Methods: This narrative review analyzed 37 studies (2018–2024) examining denosumab’s broader physiological effects and clinical applications. Results: Long-term safety data spanning 10 years showed sustained fracture prevention efficacy with a favorable benefit/risk profile. Compared to bisphosphonates, denosumab demonstrated superior outcomes in bone mineral density improvement and fracture risk reduction, particularly in elderly and frail populations. It enhanced muscular function by improving appendicular lean mass and grip strength while reducing fall risk. The drug showed potential cardiovascular benefits through its effects on cardiac and smooth muscle function. Notably, denosumab use was associated with reduced Type II diabetes mellitus risk through improved glucose metabolism. Additionally, it demonstrated promise in osteoarthritis treatment by suppressing osteoclast activity and chondrocyte apoptosis. While there are multisystem benefits, vigilance is required regarding adverse events, including hypocalcemia, infection risk, cutaneous reactions, and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Conclusions: Denosumab exhibits potential benefits in bone and systemic metabolism. Further research is needed to fully understand its therapeutic potential beyond osteoporosis and optimize clinical applications across different populations. Full article