Search Results (4)

Background/Objectives: This review examines the role of pharmacogenomics in individual responses to the pharmacotherapy of various drugs of abuse, including alcohol, cocaine, and opioids, to identify genetic variants that contribute to variability in substance use disorder treatment outcomes. In addition, it explores the pharmacomicrobiomic aspects of substance use, highlighting the impact of the gut microbiome on bioavailability, drug metabolism, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics. Results: Research on pharmacogenetics has identified several promising genetic variants that may contribute to the individual variability in responses to existing pharmacotherapies for substance addiction. However, the interpretation of these findings remains limited. It is estimated that genetic factors may account for 20–95% of the variability in individual drug responses. Therefore, genetic factors alone cannot fully explain the differences in drug responses, and factors such as gut microbiome diversity may also play a significant role. Drug microbial biotransformation is produced by microbial exoenzymes that convert low molecular weight organic compounds into analogous compounds by oxidation, reduction, hydrolysis, condensation, isomerization, unsaturation, or by the introduction of heteroatoms. Despite significant advances in pharmacomicrobiomics, challenges persist including the lack of standardized methodologies, inter-individual variability, limited understanding of drug biotransformation mechanisms, and the need for large-scale validation studies to develop microbiota-based biomarkers for clinical use. Conclusions: Progress in the pharmacogenomics of substance use disorders has provided biological insights into the pharmacological needs associated with common genetic variants in drug-metabolizing enzymes. The gut microbiome and its metabolites play a pivotal role in various stages of drug addiction including seeking, reward, and biotransformation. Therefore, integrating pharmacogenomics with pharmacomicrobiomics will form a crucial foundation for significant advances in precision and personalized medicine. Full article

Synthetic cannabinoids are a rapidly evolving, diverse class of new psychoactive substances. Synthetic cannabinoid use results in a higher likelihood of adverse events and hospitalization when compared to cannabis use. The mechanisms behind synthetic cannabinoid toxicity remain elusive. Furthermore, poly-substance use may be a significant contributing factor in many cases. This scoping review aimed to identify the key characteristics of synthetic cannabinoid co-exposure cases and discuss the potential implications of poly-substance use in humans. There were 278 human cases involving 64 different synthetic cannabinoids extracted from the databases. Cases involved a total of 840 individual co-exposures, with an average of four substances involved in each case. The most common co-exposures were alcohol (11.4%), opioids (11.2%), and cannabis (11.1%). When analyzed by case outcome, co-exposure to either antipsychotics/antidepressants, alcohol, or tobacco were significantly associated with mortality as an outcome (p < 0.05). Drug-use history (63.4%), mental illness (23.7%), and hypertensive and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (20.1%) were prevalent patient histories in the case cohort. There are several potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between co-exposure drugs and synthetic cannabinoids that could worsen clinical presentation and toxicity in synthetic cannabinoid users. Individuals with substance-use disorders or psychiatric illness would be especially vulnerable to these multi-drug interactions. Further research into these complex exposures is needed for the successful prevention and treatment of synthetic cannabinoid-related harms. Full article

In this nonsystematic review and opinion, including articles primarily selected from PubMed, we examine the pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) in order to craft a reasonable opinion to help forge a paradigm shift in the treatment and prevention of primarily opioid-induced NAS. Newborns of individuals who use illicit and licit substances during pregnancy are at risk for withdrawal, also known as NAS. In the US, the reported prevalence of NAS has increased from 4.0 per 1000 hospital births in 2010 to 7.3 per 1000 hospital births in 2017, which is an 82% increase. The management of NAS is varied and involves a combination of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapy. The preferred first-line pharmacological treatment for NAS is opioid therapy, specifically morphine, and the goal is the short-term improvement in NAS symptomatology. Nonpharmacological therapies are individualized and typically focus on general care measures, the newborn–parent/caregiver relationship, the environment, and feeding. When used appropriately, nonpharmacologic therapies can help newborns with NAS avoid or reduce the amount of pharmacologic therapy required and the length of hospitalization. In addition, genetic polymorphisms of the catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) and mu-opioid receptor (OPRM1) genes appear to affect the length of stay and the need for pharmacotherapy in newborns with prenatal opioid exposure. Therefore, based on this extensive literature and additional research, this team of coauthors suggests that, in the future, in addition to the current nonpharmacological therapies, patients with opioid-induced NAS should undergo genetic assessment (i.e., the genetic addiction risk severity (GARS) test), which can subsequently be used to guide DNA-directed precision amino-acid enkephalinase inhibition (KB220) therapy as a frontline modality instead of potent opioids. Full article

Several psychoactive drugs can evoke substance use disorders (SUD) in humans and animals, and these include psychostimulants, opioids, cannabinoids (CB), nicotine, and alcohol. The etiology, mechanistic processes, and the therapeutic options to deal with SUD are not well understood. The common feature of all abused drugs is that they increase dopamine (DA) neurotransmission within the mesocorticolimbic circuitry of the brain followed by the activation of DA receptors. D₂ receptors were proposed as important molecular targets for SUD. The findings showed that D₂ receptors formed heteromeric complexes with other GPCRs, which forced the addiction research area in new directions. In this review, we updated the view on the brain D₂ receptor complexes with adenosine (A)2A receptors (A_2AR) and discussed the role of A_2AR in different aspects of addiction phenotypes in laboratory animal procedures that permit the highly complex syndrome of human drug addiction. We presented the current knowledge on the neurochemical in vivo and ex vivo mechanisms related to cocaine use disorder (CUD) and discussed future research directions for A_2AR heteromeric complexes in SUD. Full article