Search Results (8)

Background: The incidence of cancer in older patients is high, reaching 2.3 million world-wide in 2018 for patients aged over 80. Because the characteristics of this population make therapeutic choices difficult, co-management between geriatricians and other cancer specialists has gradually become essential. Methods: This narrative review aims to synthesize current data on the contribution of geriatric assessment in the management of elderly patients with non-colorectal digestive cancers. Oncogeriatric assessment is multi-domain, including the evaluation of co-morbidities, autonomy, nutrition, cognition, mood, and functional assessment. Results: Oncogeriatric parameters are predictive of mortality and adverse events. In the peri-operative phase of non-colorectal digestive cancer surgical management, geriatric management can assist in the decision-making process, identify frailties, and arrange a specific and personalized trimodal preoperative rehabilitation program, including nutritional management, adapted physical activity, and psychological care. Its aim is to limit the risks of confusion and of decompensation of comorbidities, mainly cardio-respiratory, which is associated with the highest morbidity in biliary-pancreatic surgery for older adults, facilitate recovery of previous autonomy when possible, and shorten hospital stay. For metastatic cancers, or during multimodal management, such as peri-operative chemotherapy for localized gastric cancers or pre-operative radio-chemotherapy for oesophageal or rectal cancers, specific assessment of the tolerance of chemotherapy is necessary. Neuropathic toxicity and chemobrain have a greater impact on elderly patients, with an increased loss of autonomy. Joint geriatric management can reduce the rate of grade 3–5 adverse effects of chemotherapy in particular and improve quality of life. Conclusions: Co-management between geriatricians and other specialties should be encouraged wherever possible. Full article

Background: Breast cancer in women aged 80 years and older accounts for about 12% of cases, but its management is challenging due to the population’s heterogeneity and the lack of relevant evidence-based guidelines. Treatment decisions must consider biological age, comorbidities, life expectancy, therapy-related toxicities, and tumor biology. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of elderly breast cancer patients treated with a multidisciplinary approach, including oncologists, surgeons, and geriatric specialists. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients aged ≥80 years treated at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS in Rome, Italy, from January 2016 to December 2020 was conducted. The study reviewed clinicopathological data, surgery, adjuvant therapies, and clinical outcomes. Treatment decisions were guided by multidisciplinary evaluations, including onco-geriatric assessments (GA) and guided treatment decisions. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Surgical and treatment-related complications were also documented. Results: A total of 238 patients aged ≥80 years were included in the study. Of these, 203 (85.3%) underwent breast-conserving surgery, while 35 (14.7%) underwent mastectomy. Axillary surgery was performed in 129 (54%) cases. Regarding adjuvant treatments, 93 (39.1%) patients received radiotherapy, and 101 (42.4%) received endocrine therapy alone. Chemotherapy was administered to six high-risk patients following GA, with no reported toxicities. Over a median follow-up of 42.3 months, the study reported one local recurrence (0.5%), one regional node recurrence (0.5%), and 19 cases of distant metastases (9%). A total of 19 patients (9%) died due to breast cancer. The overall complication rate was low, with 10% experiencing wound dehiscence, hematoma, lymphedema, or similar issues. Five-year survival outcomes were OS 73.3%, DFS 66.6%, and CSS 88.5%. Conclusions: This study highlights that a multidisciplinary approach to breast cancer management in patients aged ≥80 years yields favorable clinical outcomes with low recurrence, metastasis, and complication rates. The personalized treatment strategies, guided by onco-geriatric assessments, balance survival benefits with quality of life while minimizing risks of overtreatment or undertreatment. These findings emphasize the importance of individualized care in this complex patient population and offer valuable insights for optimizing management strategies as the elderly demographic continues to grow. Full article

An oncogeriatric interdisciplinary activity exists only in a minority of high-income countries, and it is almost absent in those with lower incomes. Considering topics, sessions, and tracks in the main meetings and conferences of the major Oncological Societies in Europe and worldwide, the USA excluded, little attention has thus far been paid to the problem of cancer in the elderly. Again, with the exception of the USA, the major cooperative groups, for example, the EORTC in Europe, have only dedicated marginal attention to the research of cancer in the elderly. Despite major shortcomings, professionals interested in geriatric oncology have taken a number of important initiatives to highlight the benefits of this particular activity, including the organization of an international society (Société Internationale de Oncogeriatrie, or SIOG). In spite of these efforts, the authors believe that the management of cancer in the older population is still encountering several important and generalized pitfalls. The main obstacle is the grossly inadequate number of geriatricians and clinical oncologists necessary to an integrated care of the ever-expanding aging population, but other hurdles have been reported. Additionally, the prejudice of ageism can lead to missing potential resources for the development of a generalized oncogeriatric approach. Full article

Aim: Few published studies comprehensively describe the characteristics of patients with pancreatic cancer and their treatment in clinical practice. This study aimed to describe the current clinical practice for treating pancreatic cancer in Catalonia, along with the associated survival and treatment costs. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study in patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer from 2014 to 2018, using data from the healthcare records of the Public Health System of Catalonia, was conducted. Treatment patterns and costs were described by age groups from 2014 to 2018, with survival reported until December 2021. Results: The proportion of patients receiving surgery with curative intent was low, especially in older patients (23% of patients <60 years and 9% of patients ≥80 years). The percentage of patients treated with drugs for unresectable disease also decreased with age (45% of patients <60 years and 8% of patients ≥80 years). Although age was associated with significant differences in survival after curative surgery, no differences attributable to age were observed in patients who received pharmacological treatment for unresectable disease. In patients under 60 years of age, the mean cost of the first year of treatment was EUR 17,730 (standard deviation [SD] 5754) in those receiving surgery and EUR 5398 (SD 9581) in those on pharmacological treatment for unresectable disease. In patients over 80, the mean costs were EUR 15,339 (SD 2634) and EUR 1845 (SD 3413), respectively. Conclusions: Half of the patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer did not receive specific treatment. Surgery with curative intent was associated with longer survival, but only 18% of (mostly younger) patients received this treatment. Chemotherapy was also used less frequently in patients of advanced age, though survival in treated patients was comparable across all age groups, so careful oncogeriatric assessment is advisable to ensure the most appropriate indication for eligibility in older patients. In general, earlier diagnosis and more effective pharmacological treatments are necessary to treat frail patients with high comorbidity, a common profile in older patients. Full article

Therapeutic challenges regarding the population of elderly cancer patients and their heterogeneity lead to the need to implement person-centered approaches in order to optimize care strategies and adapt oncology treatments to each pattern of aging. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology recommends a multidisciplinary evaluation of these patients and the use of screening tools prior to the initiation of treatments. However, previous research shows a poor implementation of these recommendations in geriatric oncology. Although some studies have identified how different perceptions of geriatric oncology might hinder routine teamwork, little is known about the impact of other factors on promoting the collaboration between the two specialties. This mixed-method exploratory study used an online questionnaire to assess the perception of a group of 22 geriatricians and oncology physicians on different determinants of oncology care and teamwork. In this sample, older oncology patients benefited from geriatric care. However, there was a variability regarding age criteria and a limited use of screening tools. The multidimensional framework for interprofessional teamwork by Reeves has been used to analyze some of the determinants of the collaboration between oncology physicians and geriatricians. This study has identified systematic issues to consider when promoting communication and common values between the two disciplines, including available resources in terms of shared time, space and routine actions. Full article

In this position paper the Société Francophone d’OncoGériatrie (SOFOG; French-speaking oncogeriatric society), the Société Française de Pharmacie Oncologique (SFPO, French society for oncology pharmacy), the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Étude des Cancers de l’Ovaire et du sein (GINECO, National Investigators’ Group for Studies in Ovarian and Breast Cancer) and the Groupe Français de chirurgie Oncologique et Gynécologique (FRANCOGYN) propose a multi-disciplinary care planning of ovarian cancer in older patients. The treatment pathway is based on four successive decisional nodes (diagnosis, resectability assessment, operability assessment, adjuvant, and maintenance treatment decision) implying multidisciplinarity and adaptation of the treatment plan according to the patient’s geriatric covariates and her motivation towards treatment. Specific attention must be paid to geriatric intervention, supportive care and pharmaceutical conciliation. Studies are needed to prospectively evaluate the impact of geriatric vulnerability parameters at each step of the treatment agenda and the impact of geriatric interventions on patient outcomes. Full article

Background: Care overburden makes it difficult to perform comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) in oncology settings. We analyzed if screening tools modified radiotherapy in oncogeriatric patients. Methods: Patients ≥ 65 years, irradiated between December 2020 and March 2021 at the Hospital Provincial de Castellón, completed the frailty G8 and estimated survival Charlson questionnaires. The cohort was stratified between G8 score ≤ 14 (fragile) or >14 (robust); the cutoff point for the Charlson index was established at five. Results: Of 161 patients; 69.4% were male, the median age was 75 years (range 65–91), and the prevailing performance status (PS) was 0–1 (83.1%). Overall, 28.7% of the cohort were frail based on G8 scores, while the estimated survival at 10 years was 2.25% based on the Charlson test. The treatment administered changed up to 21% after frailty analysis. The therapies prescribed were 5.8 times more likely to be modified in frail patients based on the G8 test. In addition, patients ≥ 85 years (p = 0.01), a PS ≥ 2 (p = 0.008), and limited mobility (p = 0.024) were also associated with a potential change. Conclusions: CGAs remain the optimal assessment tool in oncogeriatry. However, we found that the G8 fragility screening test, which is easier to integrate into patient consultations, is a reliable and efficient aid to rapid decision making. Full article

Clinical intervention studies support the efficacy and safety of exercise programs as a treatment modality for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during adjuvant/palliative treatment, but the effectiveness of real-world oncogeriatric services is yet to be established. We aimed to examine the effects of a 10-week structured and individualized multicomponent exercise program on physical/cognitive functioning and mental wellness in elderly patients with NSCLC under adjuvant therapy or palliative treatment. A non-randomized, opportunistic control, longitudinal-design trial was conducted on 26 patients with NSCLC stage I–IV. Of 34 eligible participants, 21 were allocated into two groups: (i) control group (n = 7) received usual medical care; and (ii) intervention group (n =19) received multicomponent program sessions, including endurance, strength, balance, coordination and stretching exercises. Tests included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), 5-m habitual Gait Velocity Test (GVT), Timed Up & Go Test (TUG), 6-Min Walk Test (6MWT), independence of activities in daily living (IADL), muscular performance, cognitive function, and quality of life, which were measured at baseline and after 10 weeks of the program. Results revealed a significant group×time interaction for SPPB (p = 0.004), 5-m GVT (p = 0.036), TUG (p = 0.007), and muscular performance (chest and leg power; p < 0.001). Similarly, significant changes were observed between groups for cognitive functioning (p = 0.021) and quality of life for EUROQoL 5D (p = 0.006). Our findings confirm that a multicomponent exercise program improves measures of physical/cognitive functioning and quality of life in the elderly with NSCLC under adjuvant therapy or palliative treatment. This is an interesting and important study that adds to our current body of knowledge on the safety of exercise interventions, especially in the elderly with solid tumors. Full article