Search Results (81)

Odontogenic abscesses are a frequent and challenging clinical issue in pet rabbits, often requiring a comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic approach. This review collates current evidence on the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of rabbit odontogenic abscesses, with a focus on imaging advances, microbial diversity, and local antimicrobial therapies. Predisposing factors include congenital conformation, inappropriate diet (insufficient abrasiveness, calcium or Vit D deficiencies, etc.), trauma, and neoplasia. Imaging techniques such as CT and cone-beam CT (CBCT) enable early detection and surgical planning, while traditional radiography remains useful in general practice. Treatment includes systemic antibiotics, surgical curettage, and the use of localized delivery systems such as antibiotic-impregnated polymethyl methacrylate (AIPMMA) beads. Adjunctive therapies like Manuka honey are also discussed. Two original heatmaps summarize bacterial prevalence and antimicrobial resistance from six peer-reviewed studies. These visualizations highlight the polymicrobial nature of these infections and the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains. Preventive strategies focus on optimal diet, regular dental checks, and owner education. The review also identifies key gaps in the literature, including the underreporting of anaerobes and lack of standardized treatment protocols. This article aims to support veterinary professionals in delivering evidence-based, individualized care to improve outcomes in rabbits with odontogenic abscesses. Full article

Objective: This review aimed to examine and highlight the treatment protocols and optimal duration of antibiotic regimens used in managing maxillofacial space infections of odontogenic origin, along with the associated clinical outcomes. Materials and methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024621000). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies from January 2003 to October 2024 using relevant MeSH terms. Studies were selected based on PEO criteria, focusing on the antibiotic treatment protocols and duration for odontogenic maxillofacial space infections, with inclusion of original human research and exclusion of non-relevant or unclear studies. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments using the Cochrane RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools, resolving disagreements through discussion. Results: After data extraction, 277 papers were initially identified. Following the removal of duplicates, 141 articles were screened, of which 64 were selected for full-text assessment and 55 were excluded with justification. Ultimately, nine studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. These included two prospective double-blinded randomized clinical trials (RCTs), two prospective RCTs, four retrospective studies, and one prospective study, all involving patients with dentoalveolar orofacial infections. Risk of bias (RoB) assessment using RoB 2 indicated that two RCTs had a high risk of bias, one had a low risk, and one raised some concerns. ROBINS-I assessment showed moderate risk of bias in three studies, while two were not evaluated. Conclusion: This review concludes that prompt incision and drainage combined with a short-course antibiotic regimen of two to five days is generally effective for managing odontogenic maxillofacial space infections, though further high-quality randomized trials are needed to standardize treatment protocols. Full article

Background and objectives: ABs are widely used in dental practice in the treatment of odontogenic infections and as systemic prophylaxis in high-risk patients. However, AB overuse contributes to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which is a major global concern. This study examined dental AB prescribing trends in Germany in 2024, focusing on the share of overall AB prescriptions, patient demographics, and commonly used agents. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study used data from the IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription Database (LRx), covering approximately 80% of prescriptions reimbursed by statutory health insurance funds in Germany. Patients with at least one AB prescription (ATC code: J01) issued by a dentist in 2024 were analyzed. Descriptive statistics covered age, sex, and prescribed substances. Results: In 2024, German dentists prescribed ABs to 2,325,500 patients, accounting for 13.9% of all patients in the database who received AB prescriptions. Dentists were the second-largest group of AB prescribers, surpassed only by general physicians. Amoxicillin (54.2%) was most frequently prescribed, followed by amoxicillin with clavulanic acid (24.5%) and clindamycin (21.0%). Dental patients receiving AB prescriptions were older (mean age: 49.8 years) than the general antibiotic patient population (44.7 years). Interestingly, dental AB prescriptions increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, in contrast to the sharp overall decline in AB prescriptions. Between 2015 and 2019, the proportion of dental antibiotic prescriptions showed a moderate upward tendency, followed by a marked increase during the COVID-19 pandemic and a subsequent decline. In contrast, the number of patients receiving antibiotic prescriptions from other medical disciplines decreased over the same period. One particularly notable finding was the extended use of clindamycin, a reserve AB with known side effects and resistance risks, in dentistry. Conclusions: Dentists are responsible for a significant share of AB prescriptions in Germany. The rise in dental AB prescriptions, particularly the frequent prescription of clindamycin, underscores the need for interventions such as updated clinical guidelines and awareness campaigns concerning AB-related risks and their mitigation directed at dentists. These could focus on microbial culture and sensitivity testing and patient adherence education and control for targeted AB interventions. Emphasizing preventive and alternative anti-infective treatment strategies in dentistry may also help to contain AMR. Full article

Periodontal abscesses are a frequent health problem found in pet rabbits that could lead to severe complications, including life-threatening ones. Trueperella pyogenes is an opportunistic pathogen isolated from pyogenic infections in different animal species, mostly from farm animals such as ruminants and pigs. This study presents the first case of isolation and molecular characterization of T. pyogenes from a periodontal abscess in a pet rabbit. A narrative review concerning the bacteriological aetiology of odontogenic abscesses in rabbits is also presented. The identification of T. pyogenes isolate was obtained based on the phenotypic properties and confirmed by molecular biology methods, i.e., the 16S rRNA gene sequencing and the presence of species-specific pyolysin gene. Furthermore, the pathogenic potential of the isolate was confirmed by the detection of six out of eight studied virulence genes. This report, along with the literature data, confirms that T. pyogenes may be one of the etiological agents of periodontal abscesses in rabbits. However, inadequate laboratory techniques may result in an underestimation of the occurrence of this bacterial species in rabbits. This study showed the need for standardization of the laboratory methods used for extended microbial culture for the clinical samples obtained from periodontal abscesses in rabbits. These procedures should also include the isolation of fastidious pathogens like T. pyogenes. Full article

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are saprophytes of both soil and water that may cause infection with a high risk of dissemination, mainly in immunocompromised patients. Most NTM infections occur in the lungs, while uncommon localizations are the skin, soft tissues, musculoskeletal apparatus, and lymphatic system. The possible relationship between NTM infections and dental procedures is still unclear. The authors reported a rare manifestation of NTM infection occurring in a 6-year-old girl who developed sub-mandibular swelling related to a necrotic tooth, thus mimicking an abscess of odontogenic origin. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the sub-mandibular swelling and the following microbiologic investigation showed infection sustained by the Mycobacterium fortuitum complex. After the medical and surgical treatment, the patient completely recovered after 8 months. A review of the relevant literature was carried out to deepen the clinical and microbiological aspects of such a rare occurrence. Full article

Background/Objectives: Treating odontogenic infections of the head, neck, and oral cavity requires surgical and pharmacotherapeutic interventions of single and multi-space infections. Prevotella species can become virulent during post-extraction wound healing at an extraction site, under conditions of excessive plaque, nearby gingivitis, or periodontitis, and in immunocompromised patients. The aims of this narrative review are to describe the pathogenesis of Prevotella species, particularly those resistant to surgery and empiric antibiotic therapy, and to emphasize the need for the identification of specific antibiotic-resistant Prevotella species. Methods: Three clinical cases from the lead author’s private practice were described, in which Prevotella species were significant opportunistic pathogens in odontogenic infections. The PubMed database was searched for “Prevotella and Odontogenic Infection and (or Amoxicillin or Clindamycin or Metronidazole or Flagyl^®)” from 1996 to 2024. Thirty additional references were used to develop the section on Prevotella pathogenesis. Results: Metronidazole administration was deemed necessary in the cases described here. This intervention mitigated or resolved these odontogenic infections that were refractory to conservative surgical therapy that included source control. Prevotella buccae was found to be prevalent in odontogenic infections and pericoronitis, and to be resistant to commonly used antibiotics. Prevotella species were highly susceptible to Metronidazole (Flagyl^®). The antibiotic was effective in mitigating the disease when basic principles of the treatment of odontogenic infections were employed. Conclusions: The clinical cases and the review of the literature indicate that Metronidazole is strongly indicated for the treatment of odontogenic opportunistic infections with Prevotella species. Full article

Background/Objectives: Descending necrotising mediastinitis (DNM) is a severe, life-threatening infection that originates from the oropharyngeal or odontogenic regions and spreads to the mediastinum. It poses significant challenges due to its rapid progression and high morbidity. Methods: This monocentric, retrospective study analysed the records of 22 patients treated for DNM between 2008 and 2022. Diagnosis relied on characteristic clinical, radiological, and intraoperative findings linking oropharyngeal or cervical infections to mediastinitis. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was used in all cases for diagnosis. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, surgical interventions, time from diagnosis to surgery, re-operations, and complications. Microbiological analyses targeted aerobic and anaerobic pathogens. Results: The study included 22 patients (mean age 60 ± 9 years, 59% male) with DNM. The primary sources of infection were oropharyngeal (77%) and odontogenic (23%). Hypertension (86%), diabetes (68%), and cardiac arrhythmias (59%) were common comorbidities. Thoracotomy with mediastinal drainage and debridement was performed in 95% of patients, while 45% underwent cervicotomy and 82% required tracheostomy. The median intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays were 21 and 30 days, respectively. Delayed surgery (>24 h) significantly prolonged hospital stays (median: 62 vs. 28 days, p = 0.05). Re-operations were required in 82% of patients, with longer ICU stays observed in this group (median: 25 vs. 7 days, p = 0.003). Sepsis occurred in 55% and was associated with a higher tracheostomy rate (100% vs. 60%, p = 0.029). The mortality rate was 9%. Conclusions: Early recognition and prompt aggressive surgical intervention are paramount in managing DNM to mitigate complications and improve survival. Full article

Background and Objectives: Odontogenic infections (OIs) can lead to severe complications if not promptly diagnosed and treated. The Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (dNLR); Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS); and Predisposition, Infection, Response, and Organ Dysfunction (PIRO) scores are clinical tools used to predict the severity and outcomes in various infections. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of these scores in predicting the severity of OIs in adult patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 120 patients hospitalized for OIs, divided into two groups based on infection severity, using the Symptom Severity (SS) scale. The qSOFA, dNLR, MEWS, and PIRO scores were calculated upon admission. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of these scores for severe OIs. Results: Patients with severe OIs (Group B) had significantly higher qSOFA, dNLR, MEWS, and PIRO scores compared to those with lower severity (Group A). The median qSOFA score was 2.00 in Group B versus 0.85 in Group A. No significant difference was observed between young patients and adults in terms of severity. ROC curve analysis showed that the PIRO score had the highest predictive value for severe OI (AUC = 0.912), followed by MEWS (AUC = 0.878), qSOFA (AUC = 0.845), and dNLR (AUC = 0.812). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that the PIRO score was an independent predictor of severe OI (OR = 8.45, 95% CI: 4.12–12.78). Conclusions: The qSOFA, dNLR, MEWS, and PIRO scores are valuable tools for predicting the severity of OIs. Among them, the PIRO score demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy and may be incorporated into clinical practice for early identification of high-risk patients. Full article

Deep neck infection is a pathology at the border of two specialties, otorhinolaryngology and maxillofacial surgery, and represents a medico-surgical emergency. In terms of its evolution, it can extend to the level of the thorax and result in mediastinitis, with difficult evolution and poor prognosis. The aims of this scoping review are to present the etiology, bacteriology, clinical manifestations, and diagnostics, as well as treatment, in light of the research published in the last 5 years on deep neck infection associated with descending necrotizing mediastinitis. The most common primary sources of deep neck infection are odontogenic and tonsillar. The other sources that are involved in deep neck infection are salivary glands, foreign bodies, malignancies, and iatrogenic causes after endoscopic maneuvers. The bacteriologic aspect is polymorphic, including both aerobic and anaerobic species. Complications that may appear include jugular vein thrombosis, airway obstruction, acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Timely diagnosis is important for ensuring the positive evolution of a deep neck infection. A CT scan is important for characterizing the nature of a deep neck lesion and identifying the spaces involved, and this method represents the gold standard for diagnosis of these lesions. Following the establishment of a definitive diagnosis, antibiotic therapy is initiated empirically, and is modified according to bacteriological exam results. The administration of antibiotics is an essential part of the treatment strategy for patients with a deep neck infection. Based on CT results, different surgical methods are applied under general anesthesia. The surgical strategy involves opening and draining the cervical spaces and debriding the necrotic tissue. In the cases of odontogenic causes, drainage and extraction of the infected teeth are performed. It is especially important to follow up on the dynamic progression of the patient. In the management of a deep neck infection associated with descending necrotizing mediastinitis, a multidisciplinary team is necessary. Full article

Odontogenic sinusitis is a maxillary sinus infection arising from dental pathology, primarily involving posterior maxillary teeth due to their anatomical proximity to the sinus floor. Endodontic infections are a significant etiological factor, yet the condition is frequently underdiagnosed due to its overlapping presentation with sinonasal sinusitis. The present cases illustrate the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of maxillary sinusitis of endodontic origin through endodontic interventions. Two patients with histories of recurrent maxillary sinusitis underwent dental evaluations after conventional medical therapies failed. Cone-beam computed tomography confirmed the dental etiology in all cases, identifying inadequately treated second mesiobuccal (MB2) canals or significant periapical pathology. Endodontic retreatments were employed to address the underlying dental causes, followed by resolution of sinus symptoms within days. Follow-up imaging demonstrated ongoing bone healing and resolution of sinus involvement. These cases underscore the importance of addressing the dental etiology in maxillary sinusitis of endodontic origin to achieve complete symptom resolution and minimize recurrence. Cone-beam computed tomography proved instrumental in diagnosing and planning treatment, enabling precise management of periapical and sinus conditions. The cases highlight the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach, involving dental and medical professionals, to optimize outcomes. Full article

Background and Objectives: Odontogenic infections (OIs) can progress rapidly and may lead to severe systemic complications, especially in patients with underlying conditions like diabetes mellitus (DM). This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of inflammatory scores—quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), Systemic Immune–Inflammation Index (SII), derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (dNLR), and Odontogenic Infection Severity Score (OISS)—in assessing the severity of OIs in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients. Materials and Methods: A case–control study was conducted on 123 patients diagnosed with OIs. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with diabetes (n = 42) and patients who were non-diabetic (n = 81). Inflammatory scores were calculated at admission and correlated with clinical outcomes. Statistical analyses included t-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariate logistic regression. Results: The patients with diabetes exhibited significantly higher OISS scores (mean 6.5 ± 2.8) compared to the patients who were non-diabetic (mean 4.8 ± 2.1, p < 0.001). The inflammatory markers qSOFA, SII, and dNLR were significantly elevated in the diabetic group (all p < 0.01). The SII demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for severe OIs in patients with diabetes, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80–0.95). Diabetes mellitus was an independent predictor of severe OIs (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.5–6.8, p = 0.003). Conclusions: Inflammatory scores, particularly SII, are effective in predicting the severity of odontogenic infections in patients with diabetes. Incorporating these scores into clinical practice may enhance the early identification of high-risk patients and improve management strategies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Inexperienced dentists and dental students are especially prone to misdiagnosis, and this represents a huge problem regarding antimicrobial stewardship. We aimed to develop a mobile app for rational antibiotic prescribing in dentistry based on local–systemic symptoms and patient factors, rather than solely on diagnosis, to tackle misdiagnosis. Methods: The study involved 64 participants, 50 of which were third-year dental students attending a pharmacology course focusing on antimicrobials, comprising lectures and practical sessions without (noAPP group, n = 22) or with (APP group n = 28) the assistance of a mobile application. The other 14 participants were practicing dentists who decided to register and use the application. All registered users of the application were asked to take a feedback survey, while learning outcomes were evaluated via a pharmacology quiz. Results: A decision tree was used for application development. In total, 76 impressions were collected on the application. The majority of the impressions were related to odontogenic–endodontic infections. Multiple linear regression analysis did not reveal differences in survey responses between practicing dentists and undergraduate students in the feedback survey responses. There was a significant difference in the mean pharmacology test scores between the noAPP and APP groups (5.50 ± 1.80 vs. 7.21 ± 1.03, p = 0.0001). Conclusions: The dentalantibiotic.com application was developed to support rational antibiotic prescribing, in view of tackling misdiagnosis, among inexperienced dentists, as well as to assist in undergraduates’ pharmacology learning, and the current study shows its large impact as an educational tool. The majority of participants considered it easy to use, efficient in facilitating the right antibiotic choice, and useful for everyday decision-making. Full article

Background and Objectives: Odontogenic infections (OIs) can lead to severe complications, especially in elderly patients due to age-related physiological changes and comorbidities. This study aims to evaluate the predictive accuracy of inflammatory scores—APACHE II, CURB-65, SOFA, and NEWS2—in determining the severity of odontogenic infections among elderly patients (>70 years) compared to younger patients (<70 years). Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients diagnosed with an OI at the Maxillofacial Surgery Department between January 2018 and January 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: elderly patients (>70 years, n = 49) and younger patients (<70 years, n = 64). The Symptom Severity score (SS) of odontogenic infections was calculated for all patients. Inflammatory scores—APACHE II, CURB-65, SOFA, and NEWS2—were assessed at admission and correlated with infection severity. Additional subgroup analyses were performed based on comorbidities and infection sites. Results: Elderly patients exhibited significantly higher SS scores (mean 12.47 ± 2.93) compared to younger patients (mean 7.82 ± 2.17, p < 0.001). APACHE II, CURB-65, SOFA and NEWS2 scores were significantly elevated in the elderly group (all p < 0.001). The SOFA score demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for severe OIs in elderly patients, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82–0.95). Subgroup analyses revealed that comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease significantly influenced infection severity (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Inflammatory scores, particularly SOFA, are effective in predicting the severity of odontogenic infections in elderly patients. The integration of these scores into clinical practice may enhance early identification of high-risk patients and improve management strategies. Full article

Orbital cellulitis and severe preseptal cellulitis are critical periocular infections with potential vision- and life-threatening implications. The COVID-19 pandemic is hypothesized to have had an influence on their presentation and pathogenesis; however, the real impact remains unclear. In this retrospective multicenter cohort study from January 2017 to December 2022, we analyzed 1285 cases with preseptal or orbital cellulitis in pre-pandemic (2017–2019) and pandemic (2020–2022) cohorts. A notable decrease in hospitalized cases during the pandemic period was observed (97 patients in the pre-pandemic group vs. 54 in the pandemic group, p = 0.004), particularly among individuals aged 30–39 (p = 0.028). Sinusitis remained the leading cause, but odontogenic cases increased (p = 0.025). In addition, microbial diversity decreased during the pandemic, with the effective number of species decreasing from 17.07 to 8.87, accompanied by a rise in antibiotic resistance, notably against erythromycin, oxacillin, penicillin, and metronidazole. While visual outcomes appeared worse in the pandemic group, statistical significance was not reached. These findings suggest that the characteristics, etiology, microbial profiles, resistance patterns, and visual outcomes of orbital and preseptal cellulitis have undergone alterations post-COVID-19 pandemic. Vigilance in clinical management and public health measures is crucial, with further research needed to optimize treatment strategies. Full article

Background and Objectives: The inappropriate use of antibiotics can lead to antimicrobial resistance. Overprescribing in dental practice has been reported. This study aimed to describe patterns of antibiotic prescription for treating and preventing odontogenic infections based on reports from Lithuanian dentists. Materials and Methods: Questionnaires were sent to all 4751 Lithuanian dentists registered in the database of the Lithuanian Dental Chamber who had consented to participate in surveys. The questionnaire addressed antibiotic prescription preferences for the treatment and prevention of various dental pathologies. The statistical analysis included chi-square tests and a factor analysis to evaluate prescription frequences in different clinical scenarios considering the respondents’ specialty and age. Results: Of 647 responses, 497 were from general dentists, 35 from oral surgeons, 40 from endodontists, 20 from periodontists, and 35 from prosthodontists. Respondents were grouped by age: A (≤35 years, n = 207), B (36–50 years, n = 224), and C (≥51 years, n = 209). Amoxicillin was the first-choice antibiotic for 81.1% of respondents (group A more frequently than other groups, p = 0.001). A 7-day treatment duration was preferred by 60.8%, while 33.6% chose 5 days. For patients allergic to β-lactam antibiotics, 63% preferred clindamycin. Over 90% cited acute apical abscess with systematic involvement as an indication for antibiotic prescription. A factor analysis of 18 clinical scenarios revealed prescription differences among dental specialists, oral surgeons, and periodontists prescribing antibiotics more frequently than general dentists and endodontists. For prophylaxis, 87.5% recommended antibiotics for patients at risk of infectious endocarditis after a cardiologist’s consultation (group C less frequently than other groups, p = 0.021). Conclusions: Lithuanian dentists generally prefer narrow-spectrum antibiotics for the treatment of odontogenic infections. There are notable differences in prescription patterns among dental specialists, with younger dentists showing a trend towards more rational antibiotic use. Full article