Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = ocelloids

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 19485 KB  
Review
Some Insights into the Inventiveness of Dinoflagellates: Coming Back to the Cell Biology of These Protists
by Marie-Odile Soyer-Gobillard
Microorganisms 2025, 13(5), 969; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13050969 - 24 Apr 2025
Viewed by 2242
Abstract
In this review dedicated to the great protistologist Edouard Chatton (1883–1947), I wanted to highlight the originality and remarkable diversity of some dinoflagellate protists through the lens of cell biology. Their fossilized traces date back to more than 538 million years (Phanerozoic eon). [...] Read more.
In this review dedicated to the great protistologist Edouard Chatton (1883–1947), I wanted to highlight the originality and remarkable diversity of some dinoflagellate protists through the lens of cell biology. Their fossilized traces date back to more than 538 million years (Phanerozoic eon). However, they may be much older because acritarchs from the (Meso) Proterozoic era (1500 million years ago) could be their most primitive ancestors. Here, I described several representative examples of the various lifestyles of free-living (the autotrophic thecate Prorocentrum micans Ehrenberg and the heterotrophic athecate Noctiluca scintillans McCartney and other “pseudo-noctilucidae”, as well as the thecate Crypthecodinium cohnii Biecheler) and of parasitic dinoflagellates (the mixotroph Syndinium Chatton). Then, I compared the different dinoflagellate mitotic systems and reported observations on the eyespot (ocelloid), an organelle that is present in the binucleated Glenodinium foliaceum Stein and in some Warnowiidae dinoflagellates and can be considered an evolutionary marker. The diversity and innovations observed in mitosis, meiosis, reproduction, sexuality, cell cycle, locomotion, and nutrition allow us to affirm that dinoflagellates are among the most innovative unicells in the Kingdom Protista. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Biology of Dinoflagellates)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1596 KB  
Perspective
Algal Ocelloids and Plant Ocelli
by Felipe Yamashita and František Baluška
Plants 2023, 12(1), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010061 - 22 Dec 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 8757
Abstract
Vision is essential for most organisms, and it is highly variable across kingdoms and domains of life. The most known and understood form is animal and human vision based on eyes. Besides the wide diversity of animal eyes, some animals such as cuttlefish [...] Read more.
Vision is essential for most organisms, and it is highly variable across kingdoms and domains of life. The most known and understood form is animal and human vision based on eyes. Besides the wide diversity of animal eyes, some animals such as cuttlefish and cephalopods enjoy so-called dermal or skin vision. The most simple and ancient organ of vision is the cell itself and this rudimentary vision evolved in cyanobacteria. More complex are so-called ocelloids of dinoflagellates which are composed of endocellular organelles, acting as lens- and cornea/retina-like components. Although plants have almost never been included into the recent discussions on organismal vision, their plant-specific ocelli had already been proposed by Gottlieb Haberlandt already in 1905. Here, we discuss plant ocelli and their roles in plant-specific vision, both in the shoots and roots of plants. In contrast to leaf epidermis ocelli, which are distributed throughout leaf surface, the root apex ocelli are located at the root apex transition zone and serve the light-guided root navigation. We propose that the plant ocelli evolved from the algal ocelloids, are part of complex plant sensory systems and guide cognition-based plant behavior. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Signaling, Behavior and Communication)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop