Search Results (13)

Background: Caesarean section is considered one of the surgeries with the highest prevalence of postoperative pain, yet this is often underestimated and undertreated. This study was aimed at evaluating the prevalence and severity of postoperative pain, assessing which analgesic strategy is the most effective and identifying those risk factors associated with poorer analgesic results. Methods: A multi-centre observational study was conducted on 514 women undergoing elective caesarean section. The primary endpoints included postoperative pain severity at rest and with movement at 6 and 24 h. Results: The combination of intrathecal morphine and fentanyl with acetaminophen and Non Steroid Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) was associated with better pain control than any of the following treatments: intrathecal fentanyl with systemic acetaminophen and NSAIDs (2.49 ± 2.04 vs. 3.91 ± 2.75, ES = −0.610, p = 0.01), elastomeric pump at 6 h at rest (2.49 ± 2.04 vs. 4.10 ± 2.86, ES −0.733, p = 0.04) and with movement (4.44 ± 2.41 vs. 6.14 ± 3.08, ES −0.671, p = 0.01) or epidural analgesia (4.44 ± 2.41 vs. 5.65 ± 2.57, ES −0.496, p = 0.02). No risk factors predicting poorer postoperative analgesia were found. Conclusions: The prevalence of postoperative pain control after elective caesarean section is high. The best analgesic postoperative regimen includes intrathecal morphine together with fentanyl and systemic analgesics. No risk factors associated with poorer outcomes were found. Full article

Background: Effective labor analgesia is a cornerstone of obstetric care, influencing maternal satisfaction and birth outcomes. This systematic review evaluates both conventional and emerging analgesia techniques for natural vaginal delivery, emphasizing multimodal and patient-centered strategies. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from January 2018 to September 2024 using MeSH terms such as “labor anesthesia”, “natural delivery”, “multimodal analgesia”, and “non-pharmacological pain management”. Randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and cohort studies were included. Studies focusing exclusively on cesarean delivery or non-clinical interventions were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed qualitatively using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized trials and ROBINS-I for observational studies. However, no detailed study-by-study reporting was performed. Seventy studies met the inclusion criteria for full analysis. Results: Included studies were categorized into four themes: (1) neuraxial techniques (e.g., epidural, CSEA), (2) intrathecal and systemic opioids, (3) non-pharmacological approaches (e.g., TENS, hydrotherapy), and (4) technological innovations (e.g., programmed boluses, telemedicine). Neuraxial methods showed the highest analgesic efficacy and maternal satisfaction. Non-pharmacological interventions were associated with improved patient autonomy and minimal side effects. However, heterogeneity in study design and outcomes limited direct comparisons. Limitations: The evidence base exhibited variability in study quality, sample sizes, and reporting. The absence of standardized outcome measures, a lack of meta-analyses, and limited data on long-term outcomes limit the robustness and generalizability of the conclusions that can be drawn. Conclusions: This review supports a multimodal, individualized approach to labor analgesia. Future research should prioritize large, well-designed trials using standardized tools such as the VAS, PQoL, and EPDS to validate innovative techniques and ensure equitable maternal care. Full article

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to assess the impact of early epidural analgesia (EA) on the progression of labor and delivery outcomes among nulliparous women. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted utilizing data from the Birth Registry of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at LUHS. The dataset encompassed women who underwent childbirth between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021 and who received EA for labor pain management. A total of 89 women with low-risk deliveries and EA were included in the study. The cohort was divided into two groups: Group I—parturients who underwent early EA with cervical dilatation ≤3 cm—and Group II—parturients who underwent EA with cervical dilatation >3 cm but <7 cm. The results were processed using IBM SPSS. Results: Group I consisted of 25 (28.1%) women and Group II consisted of 64 (71.9%). The prevalence of obesity was higher in Group II (p = 0.021). Bishop score was statistically elevated in Group II (p = 0.018). Upon hospital admission, Group II exhibited greater cervical dilation (p = 0.001). The rate of cervical dilation was higher in Group II at 1.54 cm/h (p = 0.033). Episiotomy was more frequently performed in Group II (p = 0.014). The average durations of the first stage of labor (p = 0.045), the second stage of labor (p = 0.033), and the overall labor (p = 0.023) were prolonged in Group I. Conclusions: The cervical dilation up to 10 cm occurs at a swifter pace when EA is administered following cervical dilation exceeding 3 cm. Notable associations were observed between EA and the incidence of episiotomy as well as the duration of labor stages. Early EA exhibited no impact on neonatal outcomes. Full article

Background and Objectives: Remifentanil is a potent synthetic μ-opioid receptor agonist known for its rapid onset and ultrashort duration of action, making it a popular choice for intravenous labor analgesia. The analgesic effectiveness of remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (Remifentanil-PCA) may vary based on the stage of labor and parity, potentially influencing satisfaction with labor analgesia. This study aimed to evaluate the degree of pain reduction achieved with remifentanil-PCA, considering different cervical dilations in both nulliparous and multiparous women. Material and Methods: Women who were ≥37 weeks pregnant with singleton cephalic fetuses, either by spontaneous onset or induction of labor, were included in the study. Data were collected from the Labor Record form, which included demographic and obstetric information, as well as the onset of analgesia categorized by cervical dilation (1–3 cm, 4–6 cm, 7–9 cm, and full dilation). Additionally, data on analgesia onset and duration (the time interval between the start of analgesia and the delivery of the baby), initial numerical rating scale (NRS₀) for pain intensity, NRS after the first hour of analgesia (NRS₁), the lowest recorded NRS during labor (NRSmin), and pain reduction during the first hour of analgesia (NRS₀–VAS₁), satisfaction with labor analgesia (rated 0 for dissatisfied, 1 for moderately satisfied, 2 for very satisfied), and complication rates were obtained from the remifentanil-PCA form. Results: A total of 513 nulliparas and 523 multiparas who gave birth between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019 were reviewed. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding age, body mass index, labor induction rates, occipito-posterior positioning, blood loss > 500 mL, or neonatal outcomes. Nulliparas exhibited a higher gestational age (p = 0.021), longer labor duration (p < 0.001), and increased rates of cesarean sections (p < 0.001) and vacuum extractions (p = 0.002). Remifentanil-PCA consistently provided mild to moderate pain intensity reduction. No differences were found in VAS₀, VAS_1, or pain intensity reduction (VAS₀–VAS₁) regardless of the stage of labor or parity. Significant differences in VAS min were observed among nulliparas at different stages of labor (p < 0.026). However, a higher proportion of multiparas reported moderate (24.7% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001) and high satisfaction (90% vs. 75%, p < 0.001) with remifentanil-PCA compared to nulliparas. Importantly, no serious complications in mothers or neonates attributed to remifentanil-PCA were observed during the observational period. Conclusions: Remifentanil-PCA demonstrates consistent effectiveness regardless of the stage of labor or parity. This indicates that remifentanil-PCA can be administered at any point during labor. Coupled with its rapid availability and immediate analgesic effect, this feature enhances the flexibility of its use in clinical practice. Full article

Objective: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) has been administered in recent years to provide postoperative pain control in non-obstetric surgery; however, current research has limited consideration of the recommendations for regular, basic analgesia from clinical guidelines when exploring its efficacy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare ITM against alternative methods of analgesia in the presence of multimodal analgesia, for reducing pain scores within the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid consumption, incidence of opioid-related effects, and time to mobilisation. Methods: Database searches and screening identified 11 trials for inclusion in this review. Pain scores were compared by meta-analysis at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively at rest and on movement, with sub-analysis of systemic versus regional techniques. Results: The data found no significant difference between ITM and active comparators for reducing pain scores at rest or on movement at any of the time intervals explored. Sub-analysis demonstrated that regional techniques may provide superior analgesia at 24 h at rest (MD = −1.19; 95% CI [−1.73, −0.66], p < 0.001, I² = 0%) and on movement (MD = 1.27 [0.44, 2.10], p = 0.003, I² = 0%). Cumulative opioid consumption was reduced in ITM groups (MD = −11.61 [−18.73, −4.50], p = 0.001, I² = 95%), with significantly increased risk of pruritus (p < 0.001) but not nausea and vomiting (p = 0.93). There was no evidence of respiratory depression. Conclusions: This meta-analysis was unable to demonstrate any significant benefit to postoperative pain relief with the use of ITM but may suggest that it is as a viable option compared to other active modalities. However, this meta-analysis was limited by a low quantity and quality of data from which to draw conclusions and demonstrated high statistical fragility. We believe this highlights a significant gap in the current literature on ITM. Full article

Background and Aims: Efforts to humanize childbirth focus on promoting skin-to-skin contact, labor accompaniment, and breastfeeding. Despite these advancements, cesarean sections often lack a consideration of immediate mother–child contact, early breastfeeding initiation, and follow-up. This underscores the need for a ‘natural’ approach to cesarean sections, aiming to ‘humanize’ the procedure and emulate some aspects of vaginal birth. Materials and Methods: An observational longitudinal cohort study was conducted, involving pregnant women scheduled for a cesarean section. Two comparison groups were established: one undergoing conventional cesarean sections and the other receiving a humanization intervention. While in “conventional cesarean sections,” newborns are separated from mothers at birth, preventing actions such as early breastfeeding or skin-to-skin contact, and maternal companionship is lacking in the operating room, the intervention of cesarean section humanization was based on avoiding the separation of the mother and newborn, promoting skin-to-skin contact, early breastfeeding, and maternal accompaniment during surgery. Descriptive data on maternal and neonatal variables, including breastfeeding initiation, maintenance, and baby weight trends, were collected. Additionally, a validated survey assessed the pain, satisfaction, and anxiety among the 73 participating women. Results: Women undergoing natural cesarean sections reported higher satisfaction, lower anxiety, and reduced postoperative pain, requiring less analgesia. Although their exclusive breastfeeding rates at 10 days postpartum showed no significant difference, statistically significant differences favored natural cesarean sections at 3 months (67.5% vs. 25%) and 6 months (50% vs. 4.5%). Neonates in the natural cesarean group exhibited greater weight gain at 10 days postpartum compared to those delivered conventionally (+49.90 g vs. −39.52 g). No significant differences in blood counts were observed between the groups. Conclusions: This study underscores the manifold advantages offered by the natural cesarean procedure compared to the conventional cesarean approach. Notably, a NC demonstrates superior outcomes in terms of heightened maternal satisfaction with the obstetric process, the enhanced sustainability of exclusive breastfeeding, and augmented neonatal weight gain. Full article

There is a growing interest in wearable inertial sensors to monitor and analyze the movements of pregnant women. The noninvasive and discrete nature of these sensors, integrated into devices accumulating large datasets, offers a unique opportunity to study the dynamic changes in movement patterns during the rapid physical transformations induced by pregnancy. However, the final cut of the third trimester of pregnancy, particularly the first stage of labor up to delivery, remains underexplored. The growing popularity of “walking epidural”, a neuraxial analgesia method allowing motor function preservation, ambulation, and free movement throughout labor and during delivery, opens new opportunities to study the biomechanics of labor using inertial sensors. Critical research gaps exist in parturient fall prediction and detection during walking epidural and understanding pain dynamics during labor, particularly in the presence of pelvic girdle pain. The analysis of fetal descent, upright positions, and their relationship with dynamic pelvic movements facilitated by walking during labor is another area where inertial sensors can play an interesting role. Moreover, as contemporary obstetrics advocate for less restricted or non-restricted movements during labor, the role of inertial sensors in objectively measuring the quantity and quality of women’s movements becomes increasingly important. This includes studying the impact of epidural analgesia on maternal mobility, walking patterns, and associated obstetrical outcomes. In this paper, the potential use of wearable inertial sensors for gait analysis in the first stage of labor is discussed. Full article

Nowadays, obstetrical anesthesia-related mortality is a very rare complication in industrialized countries. The recommended choice of intrathecal opioid for spinal anesthesia in the context of a multimodal peripartum pain management concept is discussed in this narrative review. Nowadays, there is a consensus that a perioperative multimodal pain concept should be used for caesarean delivery. This pain concept should include neuraxial opioids for spinal anesthesia, acetaminophen, NSAIDs, intravenous dexamethasone, and postoperative local or regional anesthetic procedures. Long-acting lipophobic opioids (diamorphine and morphine) have a significant analgesic advantage over short-acting lipophilic opioids (sufentanil and fentanyl). The risk of clinically relevant respiratory depression after neuraxial long-acting opioids is nowadays considered negligible, even if the data situation is weak in this regard. The question remains as to whether a pain concept that is ideally adapted to a neuraxial short-acting opioid shows benefit to a pain concept that is optimally adapted to neuraxial morphine. If long-acting opioids are used, the timing of each additional component of the multimodal analgesia strategy could ideally be adjusted to this longer duration of action. Full article

This cross-sectional descriptive study aimed to analyze the relationship between maternal positions during the expulsion phase and perineal outcomes in 367 eutocic births attended by midwives or midwifery residents at a public hospital in northern Spain in 2018. A total of 94.3% of women opted for horizontal positions. Limited sacral retroversion was observed in 71.7%, potentially influencing perineal outcomes. A low incidence of tears indicated effective management during the expulsive phase, with an episiotomy rate of 15.3%, which was slightly above the 15% standard. Primiparity and maternal age were identified as risk factors associated with episiotomy. Additionally, sacral mobilization and vertical positions during delivery were significantly related to fewer perineal injuries, suggesting benefits for both mother and newborn. The correlation between maternal positions and the need for epidural analgesia highlighted the importance of considering these in pain management during childbirth. Despite limitations, the study provides valuable insight into obstetric practices and advocates for a woman-centered approach that respects autonomy during childbirth. Further research is needed to explore biomechanical parameters and enhance childbirth experiences. Full article

Background: Although there is scientific evidence regarding the use of water immersion during labor, this evidence is primarily focused on the first stage of labor. There is limited scientific evidence on water immersion during the second stage of labor. Objective: The objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and synthesis of contemporary evidence related to water birth, with a specific focus on the second stage of labor. Methods: A systematic review of the scientific literature published between January 2018 and October 2023 was carried out. A synthesis of the results was conducted following the Synthesis without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were utilized as information sources. The search strategy was designed using the keywords “immersion” and “parturition”, along with their relevant synonyms. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies employing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and quantitative and qualitative approaches focusing on pregnant women undergoing water immersion at any stage of the labor process. Results: Eleven articles were selected: two systematic reviews (one quantitative and one qualitative), five cohort studies, one case–control study, one cross-sectional observational study, and two qualitative studies. A thorough assessment of the methodology was performed using several specific tools: the Cochrane RoB 2 (Risk of Bias 2) tool for systematic reviews, JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research for qualitative studies, STROBE for observational descriptive studies, and CASPe for qualitative studies. The results provided fundamental insights that will contribute to conceptual standardization regarding the effects of water birth on maternal and fetal health. Additionally, a synthesis of the results was performed concerning types of delivery, analgesia use, pain perception, and maternal satisfaction with the water birth experience. Conclusions: In this study, we conclude that the results regarding delivery types, labor durations, and analgesia use found in the literature, along with statistically significant maternal/fetal effects, are crucial for making recommendations regarding the use of water during labor in any of its stages if the woman desires it safely. Full article

Background: The advantages of PCEA over CEA have been demonstrated in obstetric patients. Whether a similar benefit applies to surgical patients is unclear. Methods: Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched, enabling a systematic review of studies comparing PCEA and CEA in adult surgical patients (PROSPERO: CRD42018106644). The study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2). The primary outcome was pain scores on postoperative day one (POD1). Secondary outcomes were 24 or 48 h epidural or intravenous total analgesic dose, systemic analgesics, manual top-ups, side effects, and patient satisfaction. Results: Six randomized controlled trials with high heterogeneity of study characteristics were identified with a moderate risk of bias. Two studies showed significantly reduced resting pain scores on POD1 in PCEA compared with CEA patients (36–44%, p < 0.05). Four studies found comparable pain scores between these groups. PCEA use reduced epidural medication (28% to 40% reduction, p < 0.01) in four studies. One study found a 23% reduction (p < 0.001) of top-ups in PCEA; intravenous morphine use by PCEA patients was reduced (0.16 vs. 3.45 mg per patient, p < 0.05) in one study. PCEA patients were more satisfied with analgesia (p < 0.001) in two studies. Nausea and vomiting were reduced in PCEA (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Regarding the reduction in pain scores, the effects of PCEA were not significant or clinically not relevant. However, regarding the amount of epidural drug use, the amount of required rescue systemic analgesics, patient satisfaction, and the number of required top-ups, PCEA had advantages over CEA in surgical patients. Full article

The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to determine the analgesic effectiveness of peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), including each anatomical approach, with or without intrathecal morphine (ITMP) in cesarean delivery (CD). All relevant randomized controlled trials comparing the analgesic effectiveness of PNBs with or without ITMP after CD until July 2021. The two co-primary outcomes were designated as (1) pain at rest 6 h after surgery and (2) postoperative cumulative 24-h morphine equivalent consumption. Secondary outcomes were the time to first analgesic request, pain at rest 24 h, and dynamic pain 6 and 24 h after surgery. Seventy-six studies (6278 women) were analyzed. The combined ilioinguinal nerve and anterior transversus abdominis plane (II-aTAP) block in conjunction with ITMP had the highest SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) values for postoperative rest pain at 6 h (88.4%) and 24-h morphine consumption (99.4%). Additionally, ITMP, ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block in conjunction with ITMP, lateral TAP block, and wound infiltration (WI) or continuous infusion (WC) below the fascia also showed a significant reduction in two co-primary outcomes. Only the II-aTAP block had a statistically significant additional analgesic effect compared to ITMP alone on rest pain at 6 h after surgery (−7.60 (−12.49, −2.70)). In conclusion, combined II-aTAP block in conjunction with ITMP is the most effective post-cesarean analgesic strategy with lower rest pain at 6 h and cumulative 24-h morphine consumption. Using the six described analgesic strategies for postoperative pain management after CD is considered reasonable. Lateral TAP block, WI, and WC below the fascia may be useful alternatives in patients with a history of sensitivity or severe adverse effects to opioids or when the CD is conducted under general anesthesia. Full article