Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = multi-edge-type LDPC codes

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 3084 KB  
Article
A Regional Message Scaling Min-Sum Decoding Algorithm for MET-LDPC Codes
by Ying You, Guodong Su and Weiwei Lin
Symmetry 2026, 18(3), 444; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18030444 - 4 Mar 2026
Viewed by 234
Abstract
To offer multi-edge type low-density parity-check (MET-LDPC) codes with better performance, this paper proposes a regional message scaling min-sum (RMS) decoding algorithm which improves the performance of the traditional min-sum (MS) decoding algorithm and its modified versions. The contributions of this study are [...] Read more.
To offer multi-edge type low-density parity-check (MET-LDPC) codes with better performance, this paper proposes a regional message scaling min-sum (RMS) decoding algorithm which improves the performance of the traditional min-sum (MS) decoding algorithm and its modified versions. The contributions of this study are as follows. First, based on the edge-type topology of MET-LDPC codes, we fully exploit their inherent structural information to develop a cross-region decoding architecture by dynamically partitioning the edges of the Tanner graph into three functional regions. Second, we introduce cross-region message scaling (CMS) factors to establish an asymmetric information flow control mechanism, which adaptively regulates the intensity of information exchange across regions. Third, by integrating the multi-edge structure, the cross-region decoding architecture, and the asymmetric information flow control mechanism into a unified framework, we propose the RMS decoding algorithm tailored for MET-LDPC codes. For various code lengths, simulation results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm achieves a significantly lower error floor compared to the traditional MS decoding algorithm and its modified versions over the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Computer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 349 KB  
Article
Coded Cooperation for Multiway Relaying in Wireless Sensor Networks
by Zhongwei Si, Junyang Ma and Ragnar Thobaben
Sensors 2015, 15(7), 15265-15284; https://doi.org/10.3390/s150715265 - 29 Jun 2015
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 5504
Abstract
Wireless sensor networks have been considered as an enabling technology for constructing smart cities. One important feature of wireless sensor networks is that the sensor nodes collaborate in some manner for communications. In this manuscript, we focus on the model of multiway relaying [...] Read more.
Wireless sensor networks have been considered as an enabling technology for constructing smart cities. One important feature of wireless sensor networks is that the sensor nodes collaborate in some manner for communications. In this manuscript, we focus on the model of multiway relaying with full data exchange where each user wants to transmit and receive data to and from all other users in the network. We derive the capacity region for this specific model and propose a coding strategy through coset encoding. To obtain good performance with practical codes, we choose spatially-coupled LDPC (SC-LDPC) codes for the coded cooperation. In particular, for the message broadcasting from the relay, we construct multi-edge-type (MET) SC-LDPC codes by repeatedly applying coset encoding. Due to the capacity-achieving property of the SC-LDPC codes, we prove that the capacity region can theoretically be achieved by the proposed MET SC-LDPC codes. Numerical results with finite node degrees are provided, which show that the achievable rates approach the boundary of the capacity region in both binary erasure channels and additive white Gaussian channels. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Show Figures

Back to TopTop